Skip to main content

REVIEW article

Front. Psychol., 09 June 2023
Sec. Media Psychology
This article is part of the Research Topic The Metaverse, Immersive Virtual Reality and its Implications on Human Behavior View all 9 articles

Design guidelines for limiting and eliminating virtual reality-induced symptoms and effects at work: a comprehensive, factor-oriented review

Updated
\r\nAlexis D. Souchet,
Alexis D. Souchet1,2*Domitile LourdeauxDomitile Lourdeaux1Jean-Marie BurkhardtJean-Marie Burkhardt3Peter A. HancockPeter A. Hancock4
  • 1Heudiasyc UMR 7253, Alliance Sorbonne Université, Université de Technologie de Compiègne, CNRS, Compiègne, France
  • 2Institute for Creative Technologies, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, United States
  • 3IFSTTAR, University Gustave Eiffel and University of Paris, Paris, France
  • 4Department of Psychology, University of Central Florida, Orlando, FL, United States

Virtual reality (VR) can induce side effects known as virtual reality-induced symptoms and effects (VRISE). To address this concern, we identify a literature-based listing of these factors thought to influence VRISE with a focus on office work use. Using those, we recommend guidelines for VRISE amelioration intended for virtual environment creators and users. We identify five VRISE risks, focusing on short-term symptoms with their short-term effects. Three overall factor categories are considered: individual, hardware, and software. Over 90 factors may influence VRISE frequency and severity. We identify guidelines for each factor to help reduce VR side effects. To better reflect our confidence in those guidelines, we graded each with a level of evidence rating. Common factors occasionally influence different forms of VRISE. This can lead to confusion in the literature. General guidelines for using VR at work involve worker adaptation, such as limiting immersion times to between 20 and 30 min. These regimens involve taking regular breaks. Extra care is required for workers with special needs, neurodiversity, and gerontechnological concerns. In addition to following our guidelines, stakeholders should be aware that current head-mounted displays and virtual environments can continue to induce VRISE. While no single existing method fully alleviates VRISE, workers' health and safety must be monitored and safeguarded when VR is used at work.

1. Introduction

The COVID-19 pandemic conditions have accelerated the democratization of itinerant and remote work (Gajendran et al., 2021), making virtual reality (VR) an attractive alternative to support remote and collaborative office work (Ofek et al., 2020) and fostering the potential for its mass adoption (Grubert et al., 2018; Fereydooni and Walker, 2020; Knierim and Schmidt, 2020). While the potential benefits of VR have been widely reported in the literature, several authors (Keller and Colucci, 1998; Stanney et al., 1998; Sharples et al., 2008; Melzer et al., 2009; Fuchs, 2017, 2018; Souchet, 2020; Anses, 2021; Grassini and Laumann, 2021; Souchet et al., 2022) have stressed the necessity to address potential health and safety-related side effects of VR exposure. We focus specifically on office work use of VR.

Many terms have referred to such adversarial effects in the literature, most notably “cybersickness,” “VR sickness,” or “Simulator sickness.” In this study, we adopt the terms virtual reality-induced symptoms and effects (VRISE) introduced by Cobb et al. (1999) as it elicits a complete picture of the variety of VR side effects. VRISE initially encompasses cybersickness, postural instability, and other effects on psychomotor control, perceptual judgment, concentration, stress, and physical ergonomics (Cobb et al., 1999; Nichols, 1999; Nichols and Patel, 2002). Besides cybersickness, which is the most documented VRISE, the literature highlights four other undesired deleterious effects: visual fatigue, muscle fatigue, musculoskeletal discomfort, acute Stress, and mental overload. We propose to distinguish between cybersickness and visual fatigue. Indeed, cybersickness mostly refers to visually induced motion sickness that negatively impacts oculomotor function (Wang Y. et al., 2019). However, visual fatigue can occur without visually induced motion sickness (Souchet et al., 2022). Additionally, to health and safety concerns, the occurrence of VRISE can also induce a negative user experience (Somrak et al., 2019; Lavoie et al., 2020) and drastically impair performance in the task. For recent reviews of and in-depth discussions of VRISE, see, e.g., Ref Stanney et al. (2020b, 2021b), Howard and Van Zandt (2021), and Souchet et al. (2022).

Despite continuous improvements in the related technologies and the most recent innovations, the literature still provides evidence of VRISE with simulators and virtual environments. For example, Saredakis et al. (2020) found a mean dropout rate of 15.6% (min = 0%, max. = 100%) based on data reported in 44 empirical studies from the 55 selected for their systematic review of cybersickness and VR content impact with a head-mounted display (HMD). More generally, according to Stanney et al. (2021a) some side effects could be experienced even by more than 80% of VR users.

The research on VRISE has revealed that deleterious responses of users to virtual environment (VE) exposure vary widely depending on several factors, among which are the characteristics and capabilities of the users, the system (hardware/software) characteristics, and the implemented tasks to be performed with the VE. Unfortunately, no complete and holistic approaches to these different VRISE-related factors to be considered at the design and evaluation stages of VE development have been provided as far as we know. The literature provides some lists of factors specific to one single VRISE [e.g., for cybersickness, see Davis et al. (2014), LaViola et al. (2017)] or reports on a specific subset of factors that can influence VRISE. The latter include, for example, the visual fatigue caused by stereoscopy (Bando et al., 2012), cybersickness (Mittelstaedt, 2020; Howard and Van Zandt, 2021; Rebenitsch and Owen, 2021), and a panoply of other VRISE issues that could arise with VR usage (Chen et al., 2021). Factors are described, however, at various degrees of detail and completeness with no systematic wording consistency. Further limitations include that it is not always clear whether the claimed factors are grounded on empirical evidence, nor if they were identified in a VR context (Stanney et al., 2020b, 2021b; Howard and Van Zandt, 2021; Souchet et al., 2022). Further shortcomings in the current literature are related to the confounding effects of VRISE on other psychophysiological effects or among them, as recently emphasized (Kourtesis et al., 2019). One VRISE could influence another, but very few direct experimental proofs allow us to appreciate the magnitude of those influences (Alsuraykh et al., 2019; Mittelstaedt, 2020; Sepich et al., 2022; Souchet et al., 2022).

Developing the use of VR at work can result in increased exposure of the population to these multiple side effects and their impact on workers' health and safety (LaViola et al., 2017; Fuchs, 2018; Khakurel et al., 2018; Çöltekin et al., 2020; Olson et al., 2020; Anses, 2021; Ens et al., 2021). Such risks were featured in the European Agency for Safety and Health at Work warning (EU-OSHA, 2019). Thus, it is critical to examine and organize the current knowledge on the whole set of potential VRISE relevant to using VR in a work context. This knowledge includes evidence associated with the various factors involved in VRISE occurrence (e.g., individual, contextual, or technological) and design resources and solutions susceptible to avoiding these effects or at least decreasing their impact and likelihood. In particular, design guidelines and principles provide essential resources. They can be combined with and integrated with all user-centered design processes. Design guidelines and principles have an extended history in human–computer interaction to support user interface decisions, e.g., Smith and Mosier (1986). Design decisions take advantage of extant practical experiences, results from user studies, and applicable experimental findings to promote application consistency. As technology develops, such guidelines have been adapted for or explicitly defined in VR (Gabbard et al., 1999; Stanney et al., 2003b, 2021a; Burkhardt et al., 2006). Particular devices and/or their components have driven guidelines regarding VR dimensions such as haptics (Hale and Stanney, 2004), 3D interaction (LaViola et al., 2017), or HMD's application in general (Vi et al., 2019). Guidelines for domain-specific applications or user profiles such as a therapist user interface (Brinkman et al., 2010), VR games (Desurvire and Kreminski, 2018), VR in human neuroscience (Kourtesis et al., 2019, 2020), and psychology (Vasser and Aru, 2020) or assessments of elderly users (Shamsuddin et al., 2011) have also been proposed. However, existing works provide only a limited and restricted consideration of VRISE directly (Souchet et al., 2022).

In a previous contribution (Souchet et al., 2022), we focused on defining the current state of the art regarding VRISE, emphasizing theoretical aspects and merging existing literature to provide a list of factors believed to influence VRISE. Following this previous publication, this study aimed to report on and organize a comprehensive review of published design guidelines associated with the five short-term VRISE cybersickness (CYB), visual fatigue (VF), muscular fatigue (MF), acute stress (S), and mental overload (MO), focusing on workers and vocational contexts. To assure that our guidelines are practical, we sought to consider typical tasks that office workers would usually undertake using a PC, but in our case using VR. In addition, we want to organize this review so that it is easy to use and apply by researchers, designers, and work professionals. For that purpose, we have ordered existing knowledge by VRISE, type of factors, and potential factors that may impact VRISE. Assessing VRISE factors can further help identify and establish how users, apparatus, and virtual environments each contribute to VRISE occurrence.

Our study is organized as follows. First, we describe the general method we employed to select articles or written descriptions of each identified factor. Second, a concise definition, symptomology, and prevalence description are distilled for each VRISE. We have based these on existing reviews, systematic syntheses, and meta-analyses. Third, within each VRISE presentation, we point to Tables describing each factor, and guideline, distinguished by three characteristics: (1) individual, (2) hardware, and (3) software. Fourth, within each VRISE presentation, we promulgate general guidelines according to our presented synthesis of existing knowledge. Fifth, we discuss our summated results and explore their advantages and limitations. Sixth, tables that assemble and present descriptions and guidelines by factors regarding each short-term VRISE are displayed.

2. Methods

We conducted a literature search on journal and conference papers related to the five VRISE and published between January 2016 and mid-2021 partially (Primary Elements 5, 6, and 7 are not applied) applying the comprehensive review methodology stated in Ref (Stratton, 2016). The start date was selected because it corresponds to Oculus CV1's commercial release, delineating the moment when HMDs become more widely accessible for laboratories and other facilities and the public. Thus, it allows a targeted overview of contributions incorporating new-generation HMDs. HMDs are not the only devices allowing access to VR content (e.g., cave automatic virtual environment), but we focus on HMDs in the current review.

The review included the following search terms: (“Virtual Reality”) AND (“cybersickness” OR “visually induced motion sickness” OR “visual fatigue” OR “eyestrain” OR “muscle fatigue” OR “musculoskeletal discomfort” OR “stress” OR “acute stress” OR “cognitive load” OR “mental workload”) AND work AND (“meta-analysis” OR “systematic” OR “review”). This search was carried out on August 2021 on Scopus and Google Scholar.1

A first selection occurred based on titles and abstracts: We excluded those that did not refer to any of the five VRISE. Journal, conferences articles, and book chapters were included in this review if they were complete (i.e., includes a full paper, not just an abstract); the text was in English or French; the data were obtained from adults participants; the experimental tasks mainly were matching office-like tasks (text entry, document editing, reading, proofreading, gathering and processing data, creating graphs and data visualization (e.g., maps, plots), exploring and visually analyzing data, viewing several media (texts, images, videos, 3D objects), creating presentation materials, conducting meetings (public speaking), collaborating with other users in a shared VR environment. Additional papers anterior to 2016 were manually searched when no available review or meta-analysis was found regarding a VRISE or its related factors.

For each VRISE, we identified factors reported as associated with their occurrence and the proposed guidelines when provided. The definition and summary of the theories underlying the occurrence of each VRISE were made based on the most recent reviews or meta-analyses. Within each VRISE, we classified factors and guidelines into three (1) individual, (2) hardware, and (3) software, following LaViola (2000).

To better reflect our confidence in those guidelines, we graded each with a level of evidence based on Ackley et al. (2008) initially developed to assess nursing care evidences. Common factors occasionally influence different forms of VRISE. Hence, in those cases, crossing all VRISE can be important to envision what should be done to mitigate them.

As all empirical studies did not necessarily report guidelines, we translated the reported results as guidelines when it was the case. Hence, those guidelines are interpretations by the authors.

3. Results

3.1. Cybersickness

3.1.1. Definition

Cybersickness has been defined as “an uncomfortable side effect experienced by users of immersive interfaces commonly used for Virtual Reality. It is associated with symptoms such as nausea, postural instability, disorientation, headaches, eyestrain, and tiredness” (Lavoie et al., 2020).

3.1.2. Prevalence

Stanney et al. (2020b) have reported that at least one-third of users will experience cybersickness, with 5% of these participants presenting severe symptoms while using current HMDs generation, prevalence being almost necessarily contingent upon the technological state of the art (Somrak et al., 2019).

3.1.3. Theoretical grounding

The sensory cue conflict proposition is widely accepted compared with competing theories (Lee and Choo, 2013; Stanney et al., 2020b). According to sensory cue conflict, cybersickness appears to occur because of visual–vestibular–proprioceptive conflicts (Roesler and McGaugh, 2019; Staresina and Wimber, 2019; Wong et al., 2019; Hirschle et al., 2020; Klier et al., 2020; Saredakis et al., 2020; Stanney et al., 2020b; Grassini and Laumann, 2021; Howard and Van Zandt, 2021). These inconsistencies are also called sensorimotor conflicts. However, the ecological theory (postural instability) also relies on extensive experimental results (Theorell et al., 2015; Aronsson et al., 2017; Stanney et al., 2020b). According to the ecological theory, humans primarily try to maintain postural stability. Hence, motion sickness expands with postural instability due to the novel environment and motion cues (Stanney et al., 2020b). Therefore, the cue conflict theory defends inconsistencies between perception systems, while the ecological theory defends postural instability, provoking motion sickness.

3.1.4. Guidelines considering cybersickness factors

Rebenitsch and Owen (2021) have proposed 50 factors influencing cybersickness occurrence in VR. Unfortunately, in doing so, they do not limit to this relevant literature. However, they reuse Davis et al.'s (2014) list and align with the factors that Howard and Van Zandt (2021) noted. Mittelstaedt (2020) also proposed a synthesis. We selected Rebenitsch and Owen's (2014) factors list because it postulates more factors than other comparable publications. Each table lists one type or subtype of factor that could influence cybersickness:

- Individual factors related to experience with virtual environments and users' physical attributes are given in Table 1; general demographic factors and mental attributes are listed in Table 2.

- Hardware factors relating to screen are provided in Table 3, tracking in Table 4, rendering in Table 5, and non-visual feedback in Table 6.

- Software factors relating to movement in Table 7 and appearance and stabilizing information in Table 8.

TABLE 1
www.frontiersin.org

Table 1. Guidelines for possible individual factors relating to experience with virtual environments (CYB_1 to 4) and users' physical attributes (CYB_5 to 9) influencing cybersickness.

TABLE 2
www.frontiersin.org

Table 2. Guidelines for possible general demographic factors (CYB_10 to 14) and mental attributes (CYB_15 to 17) influencing cybersickness.

TABLE 3
www.frontiersin.org

Table 3. Guidelines for possible hardware factors relating to screen influencing cybersickness.

TABLE 4
www.frontiersin.org

Table 4. Guidelines for possible hardware factors relating to tracking influencing cybersickness.

TABLE 5
www.frontiersin.org

Table 5. Guidelines for possible hardware factors relating to rendering influencing cybersickness.

TABLE 6
www.frontiersin.org

Table 6. Guidelines for possible hardware factors relating to non-visual feedback influencing cybersickness.

TABLE 7
www.frontiersin.org

Table 7. Guidelines for possible software factors relating to movement influencing cybersickness.

TABLE 8
www.frontiersin.org

Table 8. Guidelines for possible software factors relating to appearance (CYB_41 to 46) and stabilizing information (CYB_47 to 50) influencing cybersickness.

3.2. Visual fatigue

3.2.1. Definition

Visual fatigue can be defined as: “physiological strain or stress resulting from excessive exertion of the visual system” (Somrak et al., 2019). Sheppard and Wolffsohn (2018) reference the list of symptoms identified by the American Optometric Association. These include eyestrain, headache, blurred vision, dry eyes, and pain in the neck and shoulders.

3.2.2. Prevalence

Visual fatigue is already a significant issue in everyday work, with a large population at risk estimated at around 50% (Nesbitt and Nalivaiko, 2018). Close-up work on computer screens is an issue regarding dry eyes, ametropia, and accommodation or vergence mechanisms (Lackner, 2014). New-generation HMDs still continue to cause visual fatigue (Koohestani et al., 2019; Wang Y. et al., 2019; Descheneaux et al., 2020; Kemeny et al., 2020; Caserman et al., 2021; MacArthur et al., 2021) alongside visual discomfort (Lambooij and IJsselsteijn, 2009; Sheppard and Wolffsohn, 2018; Ang and Quarles, 2020; Descheneaux et al., 2020; Yildirim, 2020). HMDs seem to create higher visual fatigue than PC, tablets, or smartphones (Souchet et al., 2018; Hirota et al., 2019; Descheneaux et al., 2020; Hirzle et al., 2020). However, as HMDs could summate with other screen usages, more prolonged exposure to screens, in general, leads to increasingly negative symptoms on the visual system (Souchet et al., 2019).

3.2.3. Guidelines considering visual fatigue factors

Fourteen factors influence visual fatigue occurrence based on our update (Souchet et al., 2022) of Bando et al. (2012)'s list. Each table lists one type or subtype of factor that could influence visual fatigue:

- Individual and hardware factors influencing visual fatigue are shown in Table 9.

- Software factors influencing visual fatigue are provided in Table 10.

TABLE 9
www.frontiersin.org

Table 9. Guidelines for possible individual (VF_1 to 3) and hardware (VF_4 to 7) factors influencing visual fatigue.

TABLE 10
www.frontiersin.org

Table 10. Guidelines for possible software factors influencing visual fatigue.

Factors inducing visual fatigue are not, in most cases, the central focus of peers for reducing VRISE. Therefore, further research is recommended in order to draw more precise and quantified guidelines.

3.3. Muscle fatigue and musculoskeletal discomfort

3.3.1. Definition

Muscle fatigue has been defined as an: “exercise-induced reduction in the ability of a muscle or muscle group to generate maximal force or power” (Yoon et al., 2020). Muscle fatigue frequently arises with screen work (Souchet et al., 2021).

3.3.2. Prevalence

Repetitions of excessive muscular loads can lead to musculoskeletal disorders and are the most common (almost 24% of EU workers) work-related problem in Europe (Cho et al., 2017). Neck, shoulder, forearm, and hands pain as well as upper and low back pain, prove to be the primary disorders associated with office work (Guo et al., 2017, 2019; Han J. et al., 2017; Bracq et al., 2019). Sitting while performing computer work can be associated with short-term adverse effects, such as physical discomfort (Yu X. et al., 2018). Symptoms associated with prolonged use of computers are neck and wrist pain as well as backache (Zhang et al., 2020c). Such symptoms are likely to also arise in VR. However, the majority of the associated literature concerns sports activity and is relatively less concerning office work tasks. Many experiments on muscle fatigue and/or musculoskeletal discomfort are assessed primarily using smartphones, tablets, and computer screens. Rarely do these employ HMDs, although the trend is changing.

3.3.3. Guidelines considering muscle fatigue and musculoskeletal discomfort factors

Fifteen factors have been identified (Souchet et al., 2022) as influencing muscle fatigue and musculoskeletal discomfort frequency of occurrence based on the current synthesis of existent work. Each table lists one type, or subtype, of factor that may influence muscle fatigue and musculoskeletal discomfort:

- Individual and Hardware factors influencing muscle fatigue and musculoskeletal discomfort are provided in Table 11.

- Software factors influencing muscle fatigue and musculoskeletal discomfort are described in Table 12.

TABLE 11
www.frontiersin.org

Table 11. Guidelines for individual (MF_1 and 2) and hardware (MF_3 to 7) factors influencing muscle fatigue.

TABLE 12
www.frontiersin.org

Table 12. Guidelines for software factors influencing muscle fatigue.

Clear information about muscle fatigue and musculoskeletal discomfort associated with VR exposure remains problematically scarce. Only a few works using PC or smartphone provide coherent findings for HMDs. However, the body part mobilized here, the tension experienced with HMDs and the interaction device use might not be equivalent. Therefore, we sought to extrapolate information from screen uses to provide guidelines. Muscle fatigue and musculoskeletal discomfort depend on specific task characteristics (Alabdulkader, 2021), making generalization challenging to validate.

3.4. Acute stress

3.4.1. Definition

Stress can be defined as a: “condition in which an individual is aroused and made anxious by an uncontrollable aversive challenge” (Gandevia, 2001). Acute stress represents a sudden or short time exposure incident (trauma, perceived threat, death of a loved one, job loss, etc.). Acute stresses are often juxtaposed with chronic stress, the latter being long-term effects (European Agency for Safety Health at Work, 2007; Coenen et al., 2019).

3.4.2. Prevalence

Current knowledge does not allow us to define acute stress prevalence induced by VR use specifically outside of wild task-specific aspects and technostress. Introducing VR at work without the proper training could trigger techno-complexity (see S_3 in Table 13) and add up to all the other apparatus workers already use, which might trigger techno-overload (see S_4 in Table 13). One wide use of VR is remote meetings. Public speaking is stress-inducing, but it seems higher with VR (Helminen et al., 2019; Zimmer et al., 2019). Acute stress, in general, impairs executive functioning (Calik et al., 2022). According to LeBlanc (Eltayeb et al., 2009), stress diminishes the efficiency of selective attention (Heidarimoghadam et al., 2020; Frutiger and Borotkanics, 2021). Stress can also impair working memory and has been suggested to enhance memory consolidation (Baker et al., 2018). Stress has been observed to impair memory recall/retrieval (Borhany et al., 2018; Shannon et al., 2019). Therefore, we can assert that stress can act to impair work performance when fulfilling tasks in VR. And, of course, these effects are dependent on task typologies. At the occupational level, stress impacts workers' health, performance, and wellbeing (Sesboüé and Guincestre, 2006; Fink, 2016). It can lead to depressive symptoms (Fink, 2007), burnout symptoms (Shields et al., 2016), hypertension (LeBlanc, 2009), and/or type 2 diabetes mellitus (Bater and Jordan, 2020). Stressors can therefore impact VR adoption as they affect task completion novelty and the spectrum of tasks' typology.

TABLE 13
www.frontiersin.org

Table 13. Guidelines for possible individual (S_1 and 2) and hardware (S_3 and 4) factors influencing acute stress.

3.4.3. Guidelines considering acute stress factors

Based upon our synthetic assessment of previous works, several factors are identified as influencing acute stress occurrence. We focused on nine of these (Souchet et al., 2022). They are couched in terms of office-like tasks. Each table lists one type of factor that influences acute stress:

- Individual and hardware factors influencing acute stress are shown in Table 13.

- Software factors influencing acute stress are given in Table 14.

TABLE 14
www.frontiersin.org

Table 14. Guidelines for possible software factors influencing acute stress.

Depending on the tasks at hand, the interactions, and the relevant interfaces, acute stress in VR can arise accordingly. Just considering the possibility of stress while using VR may already help create safe working conditions and promote more benevolent work conditions. VR allows for teleporting users to a stress-relieving environment [natural surrounds (e.g., trees, grass, indoor biophilic environment) as well as light conditions (Van den Berg et al., 2015; Liu M. Y. et al., 2017; Yin et al., 2018; Hedblom et al., 2019; Wang et al., 2019; Huang et al., 2020; Kerous et al., 2020; Li C. et al., 2020; Park et al., 2020; Shuda et al., 2020; Li et al., 2021), music (Sokhadze, 2007; Nakajima et al., 2016; Yu C. P. et al., 2018; Paszkiel et al., 2020; Yin et al., 2020)]; and could help alleviate the above-described symptoms via this capacity (Thoma et al., 2013).

3.5. Mental overload

3.5.1. Definition

Mental workload can be defined as “a subjectively experienced physiological processing state, revealing the interplay between one's limited and multidimensional cognitive resources and the cognitive work demands being exposed to” (Young et al., 2015; Ahmaniemi et al., 2017; de Witte et al., 2020) indicated that overload “occurs […] when the operator is faced with more stimuli than (s)he is able to handle while maintaining their own standards of performance.”

3.5.2. Prevalence

Current knowledge does not allow us to define mental overload prevalence induced by VR use specifically outside of wild task-specific aspects. But, mental fatigue appears to be higher in VR as compared to conducting the same tasks in real offices (Van Acker et al., 2018). Furthermore, VR induces a higher mental workload than PC (Lim et al., 2013; Zhang et al., 2017; Broucke and Deligiannis, 2019; Makransky et al., 2019). But, contradictory results regarding mental workload have been observed (Porcino et al., 2017). For example, VR presents a lower cognitive demand for geo-visualization and trajectory data exploration than PC usage (Collaboration, 2015; Kaplan et al., 2020; Szopa and Soares, 2021), and a higher mental workload does not always negatively impact task performance (Tian et al., 2021). As mental overload is especially contingent on task characteristics, relying only on a general model provides only general assertions. Examples exist in air traffic control (Young et al., 2015), driving (Paxion et al., 2014; Tobaruela et al., 2014), as well as work in nuclear power plants (Wickens, 2017). Therefore, we here consider primarily two factors (general enough to apply to a wide variety of tasks). However, (Wickens, 2017) have previously considered 26 factors that could influence mental workload. In VR, task characteristics impact mental workload, via interactions and interfaces. We thus focus especially on time pressure and task difficulty.

3.5.3. Guidelines considering mental overload factors

Based on our present synthesis of previous works, Table 15 features time pressure and task difficulty as these are the main factors influencing mental overload.

TABLE 15
www.frontiersin.org

Table 15. Guidelines for two possible factors influencing mental overload.

4. Discussion and limitations

We have provided a review featuring human factors and ergonomic approaches that have considered 90 factors that are proposed as impacting VRISE. More particularly, we considered 50 factors related to cybersickness in VR. Additionally, we examined fourteen factors involved with visual fatigue in VR and 15 related to muscle fatigue and musculoskeletal discomfort in VR. Finally, we identified nine factors for acute stress when working in VR, alongside two factors critical for mental overload assessment in VR.

General guidelines that designers should follow for a healthy, safe, and performant user experience at work:

- Design environments such that users can fulfill most of their tasks within 20-min interval to reduce cybersickness and visual fatigue occurrence.

- Provide an “exploration phase,” so that users can preview the fundamentals of their interactions, as well as experiencing local system feedback to reduce cybersickness and mental overload occurrence.

- Provide the user with a virtual assistant to adapt both interactions and interfaces to reduce mental overload occurrence.

- Limit movements within the virtual environment and display stereoscopy only when tasks require explicit depth cues to reduce cybersickness and visual fatigue occurrence.

- Create display features by considering user is sitting but allowing them to stand and walk on occasion to reduce muscular fatigue and musculoskeletal discomfort occurrence.

- Emphasize teleportation with guides for orientation if re-location within the virtual environment is necessary to reduce cybersickness.

- Allow users to customize their experience in the virtual environment (e.g., avatar, interface, and interactions) to reduce cybersickness, mental overload, and acute stress occurrence.

- Provide a monitoring toolkit that is based on questionnaires and psychophysiological measures, which allows to determine a user's susceptibility to side effects and to detect while they are immersed to reduce all VRISE occurrence.

- Provide stress-relieving procedures: these include, but are not limited to, nature (trees, grass, indoor biophilic environment), daylight, and relaxing music to reduce acute stress occurrence.

General guidelines that employers should follow for a healthy, safe, and effective use of virtual environments:

- Train workers to employ hardware and software effectively. This allows habituation and desensitization for the riskiest populations regarding cybersickness, reduces technostress that can provoke acute stress, and promotes an optimal degree of mental workload to reduce mental overload occurrence.

- Rethink and recast working tasks such that they can be readily adapted to virtual environments and their constraints to reduce acute stress and mental overload occurrence.

- Monitor workers' psychophysiological reactions in the virtual environment to record data to establish use benefit/risk ratios to reduce each VRISE occurrence.

- Have workers fill out anonymous questionnaires that inform about their individual susceptibility to VRISE.

General guidelines that workers would be informed of to sustain a healthy, safe, and effective use of virtual environments:

- Cease using virtual environments when symptoms of cybersickness, visual fatigue, muscle fatigue, and stress are experienced or task performance breakdowns occur.

- Take breaks following the use of virtual environments (take micro-naps, where possible walk beyond the bounds of the workplace, go drink water, seek “natural” spaces, listen to relaxing music or any and all combinations thereof) to reduce all VRISE symptoms.

- For those beyond 40 years of age, consider the individual to be might be more susceptible to elements of these side effects.

- Those with pathologies and/or particularities (e.g., eye diseases, overweight, neuroatypical, epilepsy, balance issues, muscle issues, and cognitive particularities), should be considered more susceptible to specific side effects of virtual environments.

Some prior guidelines have been suggested for discrete factors to promote healthier, safer, and more efficient work with virtual environments (Gabbard et al., 1999; Stanney et al., 2003b, 2021b; Burkhardt et al., 2006; Bando et al., 2012; Lanier et al., 2019; Muthukrishna and Henrich, 2019; Chen et al., 2021). However, most of these works concentrated on only one VRISE at a time. Frequently, they are not clear on the level of confidence associated with each guideline. However, to build on these previous works, we categorized factors into three types: individual, hardware, and software. With our tables, readers and stakeholders can easily refer to the present work as a guide for their design or use of virtual environments. Hence, the present offering is the most substantial and comprehensive assessment for the VR community. This is because it encompasses the greatest assemblage of information while providing the most practical and useful survey and recommendations.

The occurrence of acute stress and mental overload can be influenced by many further factors than those presented in our guidelines. Moreover, the factors and associated guidelines for all five VRISE are based on current knowledge. Further theoretical and experimental contributions are still needed to explain VRISE better by encompassing its inherent complexity. We must be aware that some factors are similar across VRISE (Souchet et al., 2022). We present them for each short-term VRISE to emphasize those similarities and better demonstrate confounding effects that remain to be addressed.

Some guidelines do not apply to all workers as we purposely selected only office-like tasks to contextualize our current contribution to the ergonomics of VR. However, very few existing works have been directed at tackling VRISE. Currently, the primary uses of VR lie in video games (entertainment in general) and training (see Cockburn et al., 2020). Consequently, our guidelines are sometimes based on observations, not directly on experiments using virtual environments for work or VR. Part of our guidelines still rests upon low evidence. Cybersickness is the VRISE with the most robust evidentiary basis. However, most meta-analyses, as well as systematic reviews, are founded upon questionnaire responses. Questionnaires appear to be the most utilized approach for all VRISE. Therefore, confidence in tested techniques to reduce VRISE relies, to the present time, less on objective measurements than might be preferred (Souchet et al., 2022).

Moreover, experimental quality and reproducibility need improvement in the VR field, which is valid for psychology and human-computer interaction in general (Chang et al., 2020; Petri et al., 2020; Gilbert et al., 2021; Halbig and Latoschik, 2021; Biener et al., 2022). Therefore, designers, employers, and workers should be cognizant that some factors tackled here and the associated guidelines are sometimes a direct transposition from the scientific literature that has not directly tackled VRISE or the work context. Such literature might suffer from shortcomings. However, it also means that part of the guidelines can be generalized to other contexts than work: i.e., entertainment and skills training. The median evidence level crystallizes this: five for cybersickness, four for visual fatigue, six for muscular fatigue, five for stress, and six for mental overload. We applied a scale from the medical field which hasn't been created for ergonomics issues, and proof that it is entirely relevant in this very case is low. Mainly because most scientific experiments in VR very rarely follow a large multisite randomized controlled trial methodology.

One major limitation of this study is that we concentrated on short-term VRISE. However, working in VR implies daily use, and a pre-print (Biener et al., 2022) documented VR work for one week. VR appears to be worse than PC working. Cybersickness is a concern, and some participants even dropped out of the study. The advantages and disadvantages of VR's long-term use are yet to be drawn. Following the present guidelines might help foster advantages, but they cannot delete disadvantages.

Another major limitation of our contribution is the included papers. We stopped inclusion in the review with papers published in mid-2021. However, several relevant papers were published at the end of 2021, in 2022, and at the beginning of 2023. Those relevant publications include guidelines for each VRISE, side effects mitigation technics, prediction and detection of side effects. This fosters the need for the research community to critique and update these guidelines.

Future valuable contributions regarding VRISE factors and guidelines to reduce any such impacts include the following:

1) Increasing experimental contributions testing influences of each factor on VRISE with high-quality methods using within-subject, between-subject, and crossover designs,

2) Increasing considered VRISE to allow a better risk/benefit ratio consideration to use VR or not,

3) Increasing experimental contributions regarding tangles between VRISE,

4) Advancing automatic VRISE detection based on psychophysiological measurements,

5) Contributing to publications looking at the big picture of VR via systematic reviews and meta-analysis,

6) Updating the current guidelines with stronger evidence.

Although important to follow our guidelines, stakeholders should remain aware that current HMDs and virtual environments will most likely induce cybersickness, visual fatigue, muscle fatigue, acute stress, and mental overload. Currently, no existing method can fully alleviate these VR side effects. Therefore, detecting and adapting the virtual environment based on psychophysiological measurements (Smith and Du'Mont, 2009) could help better individualize and optimize the user experience. A better understanding of all VRISE risks will allow a benefit/risk ratio assessment to decide when to use virtual environments or not.

Author contributions

AS, DL, J-MB, and PH contributed to conception and design of the review. AS wrote the first draft of the manuscript. All authors contributed to manuscript revision, read, and approved the submitted version.

Funding

This study was funded by European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation program under grant agreement No. 883293—INFINITY project. AS received a Fulbright grant delivered by the Franco-American Fulbright Association to be a visiting scholar at USC Institute for Creative Technologies.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher's note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Footnotes

1. ^Due to the current limitations to 32 words, two requests were done distributing between the Former and latter VRISE.

References

Abbasi, A. M., Motamedzade, M., Aliabadi, M., Golmohammadi, R., and Tapak, L. (2020). Combined effects of noise and air temperature on human neurophysiological responses in a simulated indoor environment. Appl. Ergon. 88, 103189. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2020.103189

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Abouee-Mehrizi, A., Rasoulzadeh, Y., Kazemi, T., and Mesgari-Abbasi, M. (2020). Inflammatory and immunological changes caused by noise exposure: a systematic review. J. Environ. Sci. Health Part C. 38, 61–90. doi: 10.1080/26896583.2020.1715713

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Ackley, B. J., Ladwig, G. B., Swan, B. A., and Tucker, S. J. (2008). Evidence-Based Nursing Care Guidelines, 1st ed. Amsterdam: Mosby Elsevier.

Google Scholar

Addas, S., and Pinsonneault, A. (2018). E-mail interruptions and individual performance: is there a silver lining? MIS Q. 42, 381–406. doi: 10.25300/MISQ/2018/13157

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Adhanom, I. B., Navarro Griffin, N., MacNeilage, P., and Folmer, E. (2020). “The effect of a foveated field-of-view restrictor on VR sickness,” in 2020 IEEE Conference on Virtual Reality and 3D User Interfaces (VR) (Atlanta, GA: IEEE), 645–652. doi: 10.1109/VR46266.2020.00087

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Ahmad, A., Ghaleb, M., Darmoul, S., Alkahtani, M., and Samman, S. (2021). A. combined multitasking performance measure involving sequential and parallel task executions. Cogn Tech Work. 23, 131–142. doi: 10.1007/s10111-019-00615-x

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Ahmaniemi, T., Lindholm, H., Muller, K., and Taipalus, T. (2017). “Virtual reality experience as a stress recovery solution in workplace,” in 2017 IEEE Life Sciences Conference (LSC) (Sydney, NSW: IEEE), 206–209. doi: 10.1109/LSC.2017.8268179

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Ahmed, S., Leroy, L., and Bouaniche, A. (2017). “Questioning the use of virtual reality in the assessment of the physical impacts of real-task gestures and tasks,” in 2017 23rd International Conference on Virtual System Multimedia (VSMM) (Dublin: IEEE), 1–10. doi: 10.1109/VSMM.2017.8346271

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Aichhorn, N., and Puck, J. (2017). “I just don't feel comfortable speaking English”: foreign language anxiety as a catalyst for spoken-language barriers in MNCs. Int. Bus. Rev. 26, 749–763. doi: 10.1016/j.ibusrev.2017.01.004

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Alabdulkader, B. (2021). Effect of digital device use during COVID-19 on digital eye strain. Clin. Exp. Optom. 104, 698–704. doi: 10.1080/08164622.2021.1878843

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Alexandrov, V., and Chertopolokhov, V. (2021). 29-4: invited paper: human eye's sharp vision area stabilization for VR headsets. SID Symp. Dig. Tech. Pap. 52, 376–378. doi: 10.1002/sdtp.14694

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Alison, L., Doran, B., Long, M. L., Power, N., and Humphrey, A. (2013). The effects of subjective time pressure and individual differences on hypotheses generation and action prioritization in police investigations. J. Exp. Psychol. Appl. 19, 83–93. doi: 10.1037/a0032148

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Allen, A. P., Kennedy, P. J., Dockray, S., Cryan, J. F., Dinan, T. G., Clarke, G., et al. (2017). The Trier Social Stress Test: principles and practice. Neurobiol. Stress 6, 113–126. doi: 10.1016/j.ynstr.2016.11.001

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Allue, M., Serrano, A., Bedia, M. G., and Masia, B. (2016). “Crossmodal perception in immersive environments,” in Proceedings of the XXVI Spanish Computer Graphics Conference (Goslar, DEU: Eurographics Association), 1–7. (CEIG '16).

Google Scholar

Alsuraykh, N. H., Wilson, M. L., Tennent, P., and Sharples, S. (2019). “How stress and mental workload are connected,” in Proceedings of the 13th EAI International Conference on Pervasive Computing Technologies for Healthcare (New York, NY: Association for Computing Machinery), 371–376. (PervasiveHealth'19). doi: 10.1145/3329189.3329235

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Ang, S., and Quarles, J. (2020). “GingerVR: an open source repository of cybersickness reduction techniques for unity,” in 2020 IEEE Conference on Virtual Reality and 3D User Interfaces Abstracts and Workshops (VRW) (Atlanta, GA: IEEE), 460–463. doi: 10.1109/VRW50115.2020.00097

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Anses (2019). AVIS et RAPPORT de l'Ansesrelatif aux Effets sur la Santé Humaine et sur L'environnement (faune et flore) des Systèmes Utilisant des Diodes Électroluninescentes (LED). France: Agence Nationale de Sécurité Sanitaire de l'alimentation, de l'environnement et du travail, 458. Report No.: 2014-SA-0253. Available online at: https://www.anses.fr/fr/content/avis-et-rapport-de-lanses-relatif-aux-effets-sur-la-sant%C3%A9-humaine-et-sur-lenvironnement (acessed March 29, 2021).

Anses (2021). AVIS et RAPPORT de l'AnsesRelatifs aux Effets Sanitaires Potentiels liés à L'exposition aux Technologies Utilisant la Réalité Augmentée et la Réalité Virtuelle. Maisons-Alfort: Agence nationale de sécurité sanitaire de l'alimentation, de l'environnement et du travail. Report No.: 2017-SA-0076. Available online at: https://www.anses.fr/fr/node/149881 (accessed June 28, 2021).

Arcioni, B., Palmisano, S., Apthorp, D., and Kim, J. (2019). Postural stability predicts the likelihood of cybersickness in active HMD-based virtual reality. Displays 58, 3–11. doi: 10.1016/j.displa.2018.07.001

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Arif, U., Khan, R. H., and Khan, A. A. (2021). “Musculoskeletal disorders and visual symptoms among virtual reality headset users,” in Ergonomics for Improved Productivity, eds M. Muzammil, A. A. Khan, and F. Hasan (Singapore: Springer), 821–829. doi: 10.1007/978-981-15-9054-2_97

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Armougum, A., Orriols, E., Gaston-Bellegarde, A., Marle, C. J. L., and Piolino, P. (2019). Virtual reality: a new method to investigate cognitive load during navigation. J. Environ. Psychol. 65, 101338. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2019.101338

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Arns, L. L., and Cerney, M. M. (2005). “The relationship between age and incidence of cybersickness among immersive environment users,” in IEEE Proceedings VR 2005 Virtual Reality (Bonn), 267–268.

Google Scholar

Aronsson, G., Theorell, T., Grape, T., Hammarström, A., Hogstedt, C., Marteinsdottir, I., et al. (2017). A systematic review including meta-analysis of work environment and burnout symptoms. BMC Public Health 17, 264. doi: 10.1186/s12889-017-4153-7

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Arora, S., Sevdalis, N., Nestel, D., Woloshynowych, M., Darzi, A., Kneebone, R., et al. (2010). The impact of stress on surgical performance: a systematic review of the literature. Surgery 147, 318–330.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2009.10.007

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Atanasoff, L., and Venable, M. A. (2017). Technostress: implications for adults in the workforce. Career Dev. Q. 65, 326–338. doi: 10.1002/cdq.12111

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Atchley, R., Ellingson, R., Klee, D., Memmott, T., and Oken, B. (2017). A cognitive stressor for event-related potential studies: the Portland arithmetic stress task. Stress 20, 277–284. doi: 10.1080/10253890.2017.1335300

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Avin, K. G., and Frey Law, L. A. (2011). Age-related differences in muscle fatigue vary by contraction type: a meta-analysis. Phys. Ther. 91, 1153–1165. doi: 10.2522/ptj.20100333

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Baceviciute, S., Terkildsen, T., and Makransky, G. (2021). Remediating learning from non-immersive to immersive media: using EEG to investigate the effects of environmental embeddedness on reading in virtual reality. Comput. Educ. 164, 104122. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2020.104122

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Baker, R., Coenen, P., Howie, E., Williamson, A., and Straker, L. (2018). The short term musculoskeletal and cognitive effects of prolonged sitting during office computer work. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 15, 1678. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15081678

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Bando, T., Iijima, A., and Yano, S. (2012). Visual fatigue caused by stereoscopic images and the search for the requirement to prevent them: a review. Displays 33, 76–83. doi: 10.1016/j.displa.2011.09.001

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Barreda-Ángeles, M., Aleix-Guillaume, S., and Pereda-Baños, A. (2020). Users' psychophysiological, vocal, and self-reported responses to the apparent attitude of a virtual audience in stereoscopic 360°-video. Virtual Real. 24, 289–302. doi: 10.1007/s10055-019-00400-1

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Barrett, G. V., and Thornton, C. L. (1968). Relationship between perceptual style and simulator sickness. J. Appl. Psychol. 52, 304–308. doi: 10.1037/h0026013

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Barrington, W. E. (2012). Perceived stress, behavior, and body mass index among adults participating in a worksite obesity prevention program, Seattle, 2005–2007. Prev. Chronic Dis. 9, E152. doi: 10.5888/pcd9.120001

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Bater, L. R., and Jordan, S. S. (2020). “Selective attention,” in Encyclopedia of Personality and Individual Differences, eds V. Zeigler-Hill, and T. K. Shackelford (Cham: Springer International Publishing), 4624–4628. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-24612-3_1904

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Bellgardt, M., Pick, S., Zielasko, D., Vierjahn, T., Weyers, B., Kuhlen, T. W., et al. (2017). “Utilizing immersive virtual reality in everydaywork,” in 2017 IEEE 3rd Workshop on Everyday Virtual Reality (WEVR) (Los Angeles, CA: IEEE), 1–4. doi: 10.1109/WEVR.2017.7957708

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Benedetto, S., Carbone, A., Drai-Zerbib, V., Pedrotti, M., and Baccino, T. (2014). Effects of luminance and illuminance on visual fatigue and arousal during digital reading. Comput. Human Behav. 41, 112–119. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2014.09.023

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Bernard, F., Zare, M., Sagot, J. C., and Paquin, R. (2019). “Virtual reality simulation and ergonomics assessment in aviation maintainability,” in Proceedings of the 20th Congress of the International Ergonomics Association (IEA 2018), eds S. Bagnara, R. Tartaglia, S. Albolino, T. Alexander, andY. Fujita (Cham: Springer International Publishing), 141–154. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-96077-7_15

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Bhise, V. D. (2012). Ergonomics in the Automotive Design Process. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, 309.

Google Scholar

Biener, V., Kalamkar, S., Nouri, N., Ofek, E., Pahud, M., Dudley, J. J., et al. (2022). Quantifying the effects of working in VR for one week. arXiv. doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2206.03189

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Biener, V., Schneider, D., Gesslein, T., Otte, A., Kuth, B., Kristensson, P. O., et al. (2020). Breaking the screen: interaction across touchscreen boundaries in virtual reality for mobile knowledge workers. IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph. 26, 3490–3502. doi: 10.1109/TVCG.2020.3023567

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Bláfoss, R., Micheletti, J. K., Sundstrup, E., Jakobsen, M. D., Bay, H., Andersen, L. L., et al. (2019). Is fatigue after work a barrier for leisure-time physical activity? Cross-sectional study among 10,000 adults from the general working population. Scand. J. Public Health 47, 383–391. doi: 10.1177/1403494818765894

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Blehm, C., Vishnu, S., Khattak, A., Mitra, S., and Yee, R. W. (2005). Computer vision syndrome: a review. Surv. Ophthalmol. 50, 253–262. doi: 10.1016/j.survophthal.2005.02.008

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Boletsis, C. (2017). The new era of virtual reality locomotion: a systematic literature review of techniques and a proposed typology. Multimodal Technol. Interact. 1, 24. doi: 10.3390/mti1040024

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Borghouts, J., Brumby, D. P., and Cox, A. L. (2020). TimeToFocus: feedback on interruption durations discourages distractions and shortens interruptions. ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact. 27, 32:1–32:31. doi: 10.1145/3396044

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Borhany, T., Shahid, E., Siddique, W. A., and Ali, H. (2018). Musculoskeletal problems in frequent computer and internet users. J. Family Med. Prim. Care 7, 337–339. doi: 10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_326_17

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Bosten, J. M., Goodbourn, P. T., Lawrance-Owen, A. J., Bargary, G., Hogg, R. E., Mollon, J. D., et al. (2015). A population study of binocular function. Vision Res. 110(Part A), 34–50. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2015.02.017

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Bourdin, P., Martini, M., and Sanchez-Vives, M. V. (2019). Altered visual feedback from an embodied avatar unconsciously influences movement amplitude and muscle activity. Sci. Rep. 9, 19747. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-56034-5

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Bracq, M. S., Michinov, E., Arnaldi, B., Caillaud, B., Gibaud, B., Gouranton, V., et al. (2019). Learning procedural skills with a virtual reality simulator: an acceptability study. Nurse Educ. Today 79, 153–160. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2019.05.026

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Bretonnier, M., Michinov, E., Le Pabic, E., Hénaux, P. L., Jannin, P., Morandi, X., et al. (2020). Impact of the complexity of surgical procedures and intraoperative interruptions on neurosurgical team workload. Neurochirurgie 66, 203–211. doi: 10.1016/j.neuchi.2020.02.003

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Brinkman, W. P., van der Mast, C., Sandino, G., Gunawan, L. T., and Emmelkamp, P. M. G. (2010). The therapist user interface of a virtual reality exposure therapy system in the treatment of fear of flying. Interact Comput. 22, 299–310. doi: 10.1016/j.intcom.2010.03.005

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Broucke, S. V., and Deligiannis, N. (2019). “Visualization of real-time heterogeneous smart city data using virtual reality,” in 2019 IEEE International Smart Cities Conference (ISC2) (Casablanca: IEEE), 685–690. doi: 10.1109/ISC246665.2019.9071699

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Burkhardt, J. M., Perron, L., and Plénacoste, P. (2006). “Concevoir et évaluer l'interaction utilisateur-environnement virtuel,” in Le Traité de la Réalité Virtuelle – L'interfaçage, L'immersion et L'interaction en Environnement Virtuel, 3rd ed., eds P. Fuchs, G. Moreau, J. M. Burkhardt, and S. Coquillart (Paris, France: Presse de l'école des mines de Paris), 473–520.

Google Scholar

Cai, J., Hao, W., Zeng, S., Guo, Y., and Wen, R. (2020). Imaging quality and fatigue quantification of ocular optical system. IEEE Access 8, 25159–25169. doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2969676

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Cai, T., Zhu, H., Xu, J., Wu, S., Li, X., He, S., et al. (2017). Human cortical neural correlates of visual fatigue during binocular depth perception: an fNIRS study. PLoS ONE. 12, e0172426. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0172426

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Calik, B. B., Yagci, N., Oztop, M., and Caglar, D. (2022). Effects of risk factors related to computer use on musculoskeletal pain in office workers. Int. J. Occup. Saf. Ergon. 28, 269–274. doi: 10.1080/10803548.2020.1765112

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Campos, F., Campos, M., Silva, T., and Van Gisbergen, M. (2021). “User experience in virtual environments: relationship between cybersickness issues and the optical aspects of the image by contrast levels,” inIntelligent Human Systems Integration 2021, eds D. Russo, T. Ahram, W. Karwowski, G. Di Bucchianico, and R. Taiar (Cham: Springer International Publishing), 434–439. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-68017-6_65

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Caputo, A., Giachetti, A., Abkal, S., Marchesini, C., and Zancanaro, M. (2021). Real vs simulated foveated rendering to reduce visual discomfort in virtual reality. arXiv 210701669. doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2107.01669

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Cárdenas-Delgado, S., Loachamín-Valencia, M., Guanoluisa-Atiaga, P., and Monar-Mejía, X. A. (2021). “VR-system to assess stereopsis with visual stimulation: a pilot study of system configuration,” in Artificial Intelligence, Computer and Software Engineering Advances, eds M. Botto-Tobar, H. Cruz, and A. Díaz Cadena (Cham: Springer International Publishing), 328–342. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-68080-0_25

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Carnegie, K., and Rhee, T. (2015). Reducing visual discomfort with HMDs using dynamic depth of field. IEEE Comput. Graph. Appl. 35, 34–41. doi: 10.1109/MCG.2015.98

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Caserman, P., Garcia-Agundez, A., Gámez Zerban, A., and Göbel, S. (2021). Cybersickness in current-generation virtual reality head-mounted displays: systematic review and outlook. Virtual Real. 25, 1153–1170. doi: 10.1007/s10055-021-00513-6

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Caviola, S., Carey, E., Mammarella, I. C., and Szucs, D. (2017). Stress, time pressure, strategy selection and math anxiety in mathematics: a review of the literature. Front. Psychol. 8, 1488. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01488

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Cavuoto, L. A., Pajoutan, M., and Mehta, R. K. (2019). Reliability analyses and values of isometric shoulder flexion and trunk extension strengths stratified by body mass index. PLoS ONE 14, e0219090. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0219090

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Chang, E., Kim, H. T., and Yoo, B. (2020). Virtual reality sickness: a review of causes and measurements. Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact. 36, 1658–1682. doi: 10.1080/10447318.2020.1778351

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Chang, E., Kim, H. T., and Yoo, B. (2021). Predicting cybersickness based on user's gaze behaviors in HMD-based virtual reality. J. Comput. Des. Eng. 8, 728–739. doi: 10.1093/jcde/qwab010

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Chardonnet, J. R., Mirzaei, M. A., and Merienne, F. (2020). Influence of navigation parameters on cybersickness in virtual reality. Virtual Real. 25, 565–574. doi: 10.1007/s10055-020-00474-2

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Charman, W. N. (2008). The eye in focus: accommodation and presbyopia. Clin. Exp. Optom. 91, 207–225. doi: 10.1111/j.1444-0938.2008.00256.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Chen, Y., Wang, X., and Xu, H. (2021). Human factors/ergonomics evaluation for virtual reality headsets: a review. CCF Trans. Pervasive Comp. Interact. 3, 99–111. doi: 10.1007/s42486-021-00062-6

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Chen, Y., Yan, S., and Tran, C. C. (2019). Comprehensive evaluation method for user interface design in nuclear power plant based on mental workload. Nucl. Eng. Technol. 51, 453–462. doi: 10.1016/j.net.2018.10.010

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Cheng, X., Bao, Y., and Zarifis, A. (2020). Investigating the impact of IT-mediated information interruption on emotional exhaustion in the workplace. Inf. Process. Manag. 57, 102281. doi: 10.1016/j.ipm.2020.102281

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Chihara, T., and Seo, A. (2018). Evaluation of physical workload affected by mass and center of mass of head-mounted display. Appl. Ergon. 68, 204–212. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2017.11.016

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Chiu, H. P., and Liu, C. H. (2020). The effects of three blue light filter conditions for smartphones on visual fatigue and visual performance. Hum. Factors Ergon. Manuf. Serv. Ind. 30, 83–90. doi: 10.1002/hfm.20824

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Cho, T. H., Chen, C. Y., Wu, P. J., Chen, K. S., and Yin, L. T. (2017). The comparison of accommodative response and ocular movements in viewing 3D and 2D displays. Displays 49, 59–64. doi: 10.1016/j.displa.2017.07.002

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Chojecki, P., Przewozny, D., Runde, D., Lafci, M. T., and Bosse, S. (2021). “Effects of a handlebar on standing VR locomotion,” in 2021 IEEE Conference on Virtual Reality and 3D User Interfaces Abstracts and Workshops (VRW) (Lisbon: IEEE), 393–394. doi: 10.1109/VRW52623.2021.00083

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Chow, H. M., Knöll, J., Madsen, M., and Spering, M. (2021). Look where you go: characterizing eye movements toward optic flow. J. Vis. 21, 19. doi: 10.1167/jov.21.3.19

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Clay, V., König, P., and König, S. U. (2019). Eye tracking in virtual reality. J. Eye Mov. Res. 12. doi: 10.16910/jemr.12.1.3

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Clifton, J., and Palmisano, S. (2020). Effects of steering locomotion and teleporting on cybersickness and presence in HMD-based virtual reality. Virtual Real. 24, 453–468. doi: 10.1007/s10055-019-00407-8

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Cmentowski, S., Krekhov, A., and Krüger, J. (2019). “Outstanding: a multi-perspective travel approach for virtual reality games,” in Proceedings of the Annual Symposium on Computer-Human Interaction in Play (Barcelona), 287–299. doi: 10.1145/3311350.3347183

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Cobb, S. V. G., Nichols, S., Ramsey, A., and Wilson, J. R. (1999). Virtual reality-induced symptoms and effects (VRISE). Presence 8, 169–186. doi: 10.1162/105474699566152

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Coburn, J., Salmon, J., and Freeman, I. (2020). The effects of transition style for collaborative view sharing in immersive virtual reality. Comput. Graph. 92, 44–54. doi: 10.1016/j.cag.2020.08.003

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Cockburn, A., Dragicevic, P., Besançon, L., and Gutwin, C. (2020). Threats of a replication crisis in empirical computer science. Commun. ACM. 63, 70–79. doi: 10.1145/3360311

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Coenen, P., Molen, H. F., van der Burdorf, A., Huysmans, M. A., Straker, L., Frings-Dresen, M. H., et al. (2019). Associations of screen work with neck and upper extremity symptoms: a systematic review with meta-analysis. Occup. Environ. Med. 76, 502–509. doi: 10.1136/oemed-2018-105553

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Coles-Brennan, C., Sulley, A., and Young, G. (2019). Management of digital eye strain. Clin. Exp. Optom. 102, 18–29. doi: 10.1111/cxo.12798

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Collaboration, O. S. (2015). Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science. Science 349, aac4716. doi: 10.1126/science.aac4716

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Collins, J. D., and O'Sullivan, L. (2018). Age and sex related differences in shoulder abduction fatigue. BMC Musculoskeletal Disord. 19, 280. doi: 10.1186/s12891-018-2191-7

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Çöltekin, A., Lochhead, I., Madden, M., Christophe, S., Devaux, A., Pettit, C., et al. (2020). Extended reality in spatial sciences: a review of research challenges and future directions. ISPRS Int. J. Geo-Inf. 9, 439. doi: 10.3390/ijgi9070439

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Csincsák, A. F. (2020). “A new VR paradigm to measure mental rotation,” in 2020 11th IEEE International Conference on Cognitive Infocommunications (CogInfoCom) (Mariehamn: IEEE), 000579–000584. doi: 10.1109/CogInfoCom50765.2020.9237914

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

D'Amour, S., Bos, J. E., and Keshavarz, B. (2017). The efficacy of airflow and seat vibration on reducing visually induced motion sickness. Exp. Brain Res. 235, 2811–2820. doi: 10.1007/s00221-017-5009-1

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

D'Amour, S., Harris, L. R., Berti, S., and Keshavarz, B. (2021). The role of cognitive factors and personality traits in the perception of illusory self-motion (vection). Atten. Percept. Psychophys. 83, 1804–1817. doi: 10.3758/s13414-020-02228-3

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

D'Anna, C., Schmid, M., and Conforto, S. (2021). Linking head and neck posture with muscular activity and perceived discomfort during prolonged smartphone texting. Int. J. Ind. Ergon. 83, 103134. doi: 10.1016/j.ergon.2021.103134

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Davis, S., Nesbitt, K., and Nalivaiko, E. (2014). “A systematic review of cybersickness,” in Proceedings of the 2014 Conference on Interactive Entertainment (New York, NY: Association for Computing Machinery), 1–9. (IE2014). doi: 10.1145/2677758.2677780

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

de Dreu, M. J., Schouwenaars, I. T., Rutten, G. J. M., Ramsey, N. F., and Jansma, J. M. (2019). Brain activity associated with expected task difficulty. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 13, 286. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2019.00286

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

de Winkel, K. N., Kurtz, M., and Bülthoff, H. H. (2018). Effects of visual stimulus characteristics and individual differences in heading estimation. J. Vis. 18, 9. doi: 10.1167/18.11.9

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

de Witte, M., Spruit, A., van Hooren, S., Moonen, X., and Stams, G. J. (2020). Effects of music interventions on stress-related outcomes: a systematic review and two meta-analyses. Health Psychol. Rev. 14, 294–324. doi: 10.1080/17437199.2019.1627897

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Deepa, B. M. S., Valarmathi, A., and Benita, S. (2019). Assessment of stereo acuity levels using random dot stereo acuity chart in college students. J. Fam. Med. Prim. Care 8, 3850. doi: 10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_755_19

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Dennison, M., and D'Zmura, M. (2018). Effects of unexpected visual motion on postural sway and motion sickness. Appl. Ergon. 71, 9–16. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2018.03.015

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Dennison, M. S., and D'Zmura, M. (2017). Cybersickness without the wobble: experimental results speak against postural instability theory. Appl. Ergon. 58, 215–223. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2016.06.014

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Denovan, A., and Dagnall, N. (2019). Development and evaluation of the chronic time pressure inventory. Front. Psychol. 10, 2717. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02717

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Descheneaux, C. R., Reinerman-Jones, L., Moss, J., Krum, D., and Hudson, I. (2020). “Negative effects associated with HMDs in augmented and virtual reality,” in Virtual, Augmented and Mixed Reality Design and Interaction, eds J. Y. C. Chen, and G. Fragomeni (Cham: Springer International Publishing), 410–428. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-49695-1_27

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Desurvire, H., and Kreminski, M. (2018). “Are game design and user research guidelines specific to virtual reality effective in creating a more optimal player experience? Yes, VR PLAY,” in Design, User Experience, and Usability: Theory and Practice, eds A. Marcus, and W. Wang (Cham: Springer International Publishing), 40–59. (Lecture Notes in Computer Science). doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-91797-9_4

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Ding, J., and Sullivan, D. A. (2012). Aging and dry eye disease. Exp. Gerontol. 47, 483–490. doi: 10.1016/j.exger.2012.03.020

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Ding, Y., Cao, Y., Duffy, V. G., and Zhang, X. (2020). It is time to have rest: how do break types affect muscular activity and perceived discomfort during prolonged sitting work. Saf. Health Work 11, 207–214. doi: 10.1016/j.shaw.2020.03.008

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Dombrowski, M., Smith, P. A., Manero, A., and Sparkman, J. (2019). “Designing inclusive virtual reality experiences,” in Virtual, Augmented and Mixed Reality Multimodal Interaction, eds J. Y. C. Chen, and G. Fragomeni (Cham: Springer International Publishing), 33–43. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-21607-8_3

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Dragano, N., and Lunau, T. (2020). Technostress at work and mental health: concepts and research results. Curr. Opin. Psychiatry 33, 407–413. doi: 10.1097/YCO.0000000000000613

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Dupuis, F., Sole, G., Wassinger, C., Bielmann, M., Bouyer, L. J., Roy, J. S., et al. (2021). Fatigue, induced via repetitive upper-limb motor tasks, influences trunk and shoulder kinematics during an upper limb reaching task in a virtual reality environment. PLoS ONE 16, e0249403. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0249403

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Duzmańska, N., Strojny, P., and Strojny, A. (2018). Can simulator sickness be avoided? A review on temporal aspects of simulator sickness. Front. Psychol. 9, 2132. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02132

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Ebrahimi, O. V., Pallesen, S., Kenter, R. M. F., and Nordgreen, T. (2019). Psychological interventions for the fear of public speaking: a meta-analysis. Front. Psychol. 10, 488. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00488

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Eltayeb, S., Staal, J. B., Hassan, A., and de Bie, R. A. (2009). Work related risk factors for neck, shoulder and arms complaints: a cohort study among dutch computer office workers. J. Occup. Rehabil. 19, 315. doi: 10.1007/s10926-009-9196-x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Emerson, S., Emerson, K., and Fedorczyk, J. (2021). Computer workstation ergonomics: Current evidence for evaluation, corrections, and recommendations for remote evaluation. J. Hand Ther. 34, 166–178. doi: 10.1016/j.jht.2021.04.002

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Ens, B., Bach, B., Cordeil, M., Engelke, U., Serrano, M., Willett, W., et al. (2021). “Grand challenges in immersive analytics,” in Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Yokohama), 1–17. doi: 10.1145/3411764.3446866

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Erickson, A., Kim, K., Bruder, G., and Welch, G. F. (2020). “Effects of dark mode graphics on visual acuity and fatigue with virtual reality head-mounted displays,” in 2020 IEEE Conference on Virtual Reality and 3D User Interfaces (VR) (Atlanta, GA: IEEE), 434–442. doi: 10.1109/VR46266.2020.00064

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

EU-OSHA (2019). Digitalisation and Occupational Safety and Health. Bilbao: European Agency for Safety and Health at Work. Report No. doi: 10.2802/119288

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

European Agency for Safety Health at Work (2007). Introduction to Work-related Musculoskeletal Disorders - Safety and Health at Work. www.osha.europa.eu. Available online at: https://osha.europa.eu/en/publications/factsheet-71-introduction-work-related-musculoskeletal-disorders/view (accessed March 22, 2021).

Evin, I., Pesola, T., Kaos, M. D., Takala, T. M., and Hämäläinen, P. (2020).” 3PP-R: enabling natural movement in 3rd person virtual reality,” in Proceedings of the Annual Symposium on Computer-Human Interaction in Play (New York, NY: Association for Computing Machinery), 438–449. (CHI PLAY '20). doi: 10.1145/3410404.3414239

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Ewolds, H., Broeker, L., de Oliveira, R. F., Raab, M., and Künzell, S. (2021). Ways to improve multitasking: effects of predictability after single- and dual-task training. J. Cognit. 4, 4. doi: 10.5334/joc.142

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Fauville, G., Queiroz, A. C. M., Woolsey, E. S., Kelly, J. W., and Bailenson, J. N. (2021). The effect of water immersion on vection in virtual reality. Sci. Rep. 11, 1022. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-80100-y

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Fawcett, J. M., Risko, E. F., and Kingstone, A. editors (2015). The Handbook of Attention. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 678. doi: 10.7551/mitpress/10033.001.0001

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Fereydooni, N., and Walker, B. N. (2020). Virtual Reality as a Remote Workspace Platform: Opportunities and Challenges. Available online at: https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/research/publication/virtual-reality-as-a-remote-workspace-platform-opportunities-and-challenges/ (accessed August 31, 2021).

Google Scholar

Filho, J. A. W., Freitas, C. M. D. S., and Nedel, L. (2018). VirtualDesk: a comfortable and efficient immersive information visualization approach. Comput. Graph. Forum 37, 415–426. doi: 10.1111/cgf.13430

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Filho, J. A. W., Stuerzlinger, W., and Nedel, L. (2020). Evaluating an immersive space-time cube geovisualization for intuitive trajectory data exploration. IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph. 26, 514–524. doi: 10.1109/TVCG.2019.2934415

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Fink, G. (2007). Encyclopedia of Stress, Four-Volume Set. San Diego, CA: Elsevier Science. Available online at: http://public.ebookcentral.proquest.com/choice/publicfullrecord.aspx?p=1127743 (accessed December 22, 2020).

Google Scholar

Fink, G. (2016). “Chapter 1 - Stress, definitions, mechanisms, and effects outlined: lessons from anxiety,” in Stress: Concepts, Cognition, Emotion, and Behavior, ed G. Fink (San Diego, CA: Academic Press), 3–11. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-800951-2.00001-7

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Flores-Cruz, G., Sims, V. K., and Whitmer, D. E. (2019). A study on head flexion during mobile device usage: an examination of sitting, standing, and lying down positions. Proc. Hum. Factors Ergon. Soc. Ann. Meet. 63, 511–515. doi: 10.1177/1071181319631047

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Fortune, N., Rooney, B., and Kirwan, G. H. (2017). Supporting law enforcement personnel working with distressing material online. Cyberpsychol. Beha. Soc. Netw. 21, 138–143. doi: 10.1089/cyber.2016.0715

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Franke, L., Fink, L., Martschinke, J., Selgrad, K., and Stamminger, M. (2021). Time-warped foveated rendering for virtual reality headsets. Comput. Graph. Forum 40, 110–123. doi: 10.1111/cgf.14176

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Frutiger, M., and Borotkanics, R. (2021). Systematic review and meta-analysis suggest strength training and workplace modifications may reduce neck pain in office workers. Pain Pract. 21, 100–131. doi: 10.1111/papr.12940

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Fuchs, P. (2017). Virtual Reality Headsets - A Theoretical and Pragmatic Approach, 1st ed. London: CRC Press. doi: 10.1201/9781315208244

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Fuchs, P. (2018). “The challenges and risks of democratization of VR-AR,” in Virtual Reality and Augmented Reality, eds B. Arnaldi, P. Guitton, and G. Moreau (New York, NY: John Wiley and Sons), 289–301. doi: 10.1002/9781119341031.ch6

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Fujimoto, K., and Ashida, H. (2020). Different head-sway responses to optic flow in sitting and standing with a head-mounted display. Front. Psychol. 11, 577305. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.577305

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Fulvio, J. M. J. i. M., and Rokers, B. (2021). Variations in visual sensitivity predict motion sickness in virtual reality. Entertain. Comput. 38, 100423. doi: 10.1016/j.entcom.2021.100423

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Funk, M., Müller, F., Fendrich, M., Shene, M., Kolvenbach, M., Dobbertin, N., et al. (2019). “Assessing the accuracy of point and teleport locomotion with orientation indication for virtual reality using curved trajectories,” in Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Glasgow), 1–12. doi: 10.1145/3290605.3300377

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Gabbard, J. L., Hix, D., and Swan, J. E. (1999). User-centered design and evaluation of virtual environments. IEEE Comput. Graph. Appl. 19, 51–59. doi: 10.1109/38.799740

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Gajendran, R. S., Javalagi, A., Wang, C., and Ponnapalli, A. R. (2021). Consequences of remote work use and intensity: a meta-analysis. Proceedings 2021, 15255. doi: 10.5465/AMBPP.2021.15255abstract

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Gallagher, K. M., Cameron, L., De Carvalho, D., and Boulé, M. (2021). Does using multiple computer monitors for office tasks affect user experience?: a systematic review. Hum. Factors 63, 433–449. doi: 10.1177/0018720819889533

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Gallagher, M., and Ferrè, E. R. (2018). Cybersickness: a multisensory integration perspective. Multisens. Res. 31, 645–674. doi: 10.1163/22134808-20181293

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Gallego, A., McHugh, L., Penttonen, M., and Lappalainen, R. (2022). Measuring public speaking anxiety: self-report, behavioral, and physiological. Behav. Modif. 46, 782–798. doi: 10.1177/0145445521994308

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Gandevia, S. C. (2001). Spinal and supraspinal factors in human muscle fatigue. Physiol. Rev. 81, 1725–1789. doi: 10.1152/physrev.2001.81.4.1725

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Gao, B., Chen, Z., Chen, X., Tu, H., and Huang, F. (2021). The effects of audiovisual landmarks on spatial learning and recalling for image browsing interface in virtual environments. J. Syst. Archit. 117, 102096. doi: 10.1016/j.sysarc.2021.102096

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Gao, Z., Hwang, A., Zhai, G., and Peli, E. (2018). Correcting geometric distortions in stereoscopic 3D imaging. PLoS ONE 13, e0205032. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0205032

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Garcia-Agundez, A., Westmeier, A., Caserman, P., Konrad, R., and Göbel, S. (2017). “An evaluation of extrapolation and filtering techniques in head tracking for virtual environments to reduce cybersickness,” in Serious Games, eds M. Alcañiz, S. Göbel, M. Ma, M. Fradinho Oliveira, J. Baalsrud Hauge, and T. Marsh (Cham: Springer International Publishing), 203–211. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-70111-0_19

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Gavgani, A. M., Hodgson, D. M., and Nalivaiko, E. (2017). Effects of visual flow direction on signs and symptoms of cybersickness. PLoS ONE. 12, e0182790. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0182790

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Geiger, A., Bewersdorf, I., Brandenburg, E., and Stark, R. (2018). “Visual feedback for grasping in virtual reality environments for an interface to instruct digital human models,” in Advances in Usability and User Experience, eds T. Ahram, and C. Falcão (Cham: Springer International Publishing), 228–239. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-60492-3_22

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Gilbert, S. B., Jasper, A., Sepich, N. C., Doty, T. A., Kelly, J. W., Dorneich, M. C., et al. (2021). “Individual differences and task attention in cybersickness: a call for a standardized approach to data sharing,” in 2021 IEEE Conference on Virtual Reality and 3D User Interfaces Abstracts and Workshops (VRW) (Lisbon: IEEE), 161–164. doi: 10.1109/VRW52623.2021.00037

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Gonçalves, G., Melo, M., Vasconcelos-Raposo, J., and Bessa, M. (2020). Impact of different sensory stimuli on presence in credible virtual environments. IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph. 26, 3231–3240. doi: 10.1109/TVCG.2019.2926978

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Götz, S., Hoven, H., Müller, A., Dragano, N., and Wahrendorf, M. (2018). Age differences in the association between stressful work and sickness absence among full-time employed workers: evidence from the German socio-economic panel. Int. Arch. Occup. Environ. Health. 91, 479–496. doi: 10.1007/s00420-018-1298-3

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Grant, H. B., Lavery, C. F., and Decarlo, J. (2019). An exploratory study of police officers: low compassion satisfaction and compassion fatigue. Front. Psychol. 9, 2793. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02793

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Grassini, S., and Laumann, K. (2020). Are modern head-mounted displays sexist? A systematic review on gender differences in HMD-mediated virtual reality. Front Psychol. 11, 1604. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01604

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Grassini, S., and Laumann, K. (2021). “Immersive visual technologies and human health,” in European Conference on Cognitive Ergonomics 2021 (New York, NY: Association for Computing Machinery), 1–6. (ECCE 2021). doi: 10.1145/3452853.3452856

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Grassini, S., Laumann, K., and Luzi, A. K. (2021). Association of individual factors with simulator sickness and sense of presence in virtual reality mediated by head-mounted displays (HMDs). Multimodal Technol. Interact 5, 7. doi: 10.3390/mti5030007

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Grier, R. A. (2015). How high is high? A meta-analysis of NASA-TLX global workload scores. Proc. Hum. Factors Ergon. Soc. Ann. Meet. 59, 1727–1731. doi: 10.1177/1541931215591373

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Groth, C., Tauscher, J. P., Heesen, N., Castillo, S., and Magnor, M. (2021a). “Visual techniques to reduce cybersickness in virtual reality,” in 2021 IEEE Conference on Virtual Reality and 3D User Interfaces Abstracts and Workshops (VRW) (Lisbon: IEEE), 486–487. doi: 10.1109/VRW52623.2021.00125

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Groth, C., Tauscher, J. P., Heesen, N., Grogorick, S., Castillo, S., Magnor, M., et al. (2021b). “Mitigation of cybersickness in immersive 360°videos,” in 2021 IEEE Conference on Virtual Reality and 3D User Interfaces Abstracts and Workshops (VRW) (Lisbon: IEEE), 169–177. doi: 10.1109/VRW52623.2021.00039

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Grubert, J., Ofek, E., Pahud, M., and Kristensson, P. O. (2018). The office of the future: virtual, portable, and global. IEEE Comput. Graph. Appl. 38, 125–133. doi: 10.1109/MCG.2018.2875609

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Guillon, M., Dumbleton, K., Theodoratos, P., Gobbe, M., Wooley, C. B., Moody, K., et al. (2016). The effects of age, refractive status, and luminance on pupil size. Optom. Vis. Sci. 93, 1093–1100. doi: 10.1097/OPX.0000000000000893

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Günther, S., Müller, F., Schön, D., Elmoghazy, O., Mühlhäuser, M., Schmitz, M., et al. (2020). “Therminator: understanding the interdependency of visual and on-body thermal feedback in virtual reality,” in Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Honolulu, HI), 1–14. doi: 10.1145/3313831.3376195

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Guo, J., Weng, D., Been-Lirn Duh, H., Liu, Y., and Wang, Y. (2017). “Effects of using HMDs on visual fatigue in virtual environments,” in 2017 IEEE Virtual Reality (VR). Los (Angeles, CA: IEEE), 249–250. doi: 10.1109/VR.2017.7892270

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Guo, J., Weng, D., Fang, H., Zhang, Z., Ping, J., Liu, Y., et al. (2020). “Exploring the differences of visual discomfort caused by long-term immersion between virtual environments and physical environments,” in 2020 IEEE Conference on Virtual Reality and 3D User Interfaces (VR) (Atlanta, GA), 443−452. doi: 10.1109/VR46266.2020.1581306543750

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Guo, J., Weng, D., Zhang, Z., Liu, Y., Duh, H. B. L., Wang, Y., et al. (2019). Subjective and objective evaluation of visual fatigue caused by continuous and discontinuous use of HMDs. J Soc Inf Disp. 27, 108–119. doi: 10.1002/jsid.750

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Gupta, K., Hajika, R., Pai, Y. S., Duenser, A., Lochner, M., Billinghurst, M., et al. (2020). “Measuring human trust in a virtual assistant using physiological sensing in virtual reality,” in 2020 IEEE Conference on Virtual Reality and 3D User Interfaces (VR) (Atlanta, GA: IEEE), 756–765. doi: 10.1109/VR46266.2020.00099

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Guzsvinecz, T., Orbán-Mihálykó, É., Sik-Lányi, C., and Perge, E. (2021). Investigation of spatial ability test completion times in virtual reality using a desktop display and the Gear VR. Virtual Real. 26, 601–614. doi: 10.1007/s10055-021-00509-2

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Ha, H., Kwak, Y., Kim, H., and Seo, Y. J, Jo, S. C. (2021). Perceptual difference between the discomfort luminance level and the brightness of a head-mounted display (HMD). J. Inf. Display 22, 187–191. doi: 10.1080/15980316.2021.1941339

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Ha, H., Kwak, Y., Kim, H., and Seo, Y. J. (2020). Discomfort luminance level of head-mounted displays depending on the adapting luminance. Color Res. Appl. 45, 622–631. doi: 10.1002/col.22509

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Ha, H., Kwak, Y., Kim, H., Seo, Y. J., and Park, W. S. (2017). The preferred luminance of Head Mounted Display (HMD) over time under two different surround conditions. Color Imaging Conf. 2017, 286–289. doi: 10.2352/ISSN.2169-2629.2017.25.286

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Halbig, A., and Latoschik, M. E. (2021). A systematic review of physiological measurements, factors, methods, and applications in virtual reality. Front. Virtual Real. 2, 694567. doi: 10.3389/frvir.2021.694567

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Hale, K. S., and Stanney, K. M. (2004). Deriving haptic design guidelines from human physiological, psychophysical, and neurological foundations. IEEE Comput. Graph. Appl. 24, 33–39. doi: 10.1109/MCG.2004.1274059

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Hamedani, Z., Solgi, E., Hine, T., Skates, H., Isoardi, G., Fernando, R., et al. (2020). Lighting for work: a study of the relationships among discomfort glare, physiological responses and visual performance. Build. Environ. 167, 106478. doi: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2019.106478

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Han, C., He, Z. J., and Ooi, T. L. (2018). On sensory eye dominance revealed by binocular integrative and binocular competitive stimuli. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 59, 5140–5148. doi: 10.1167/iovs.18-24342

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Han, J., Bae, S. H., and Suk, H. J. (2017). Comparison of visual discomfort and visual fatigue between head-mounted display and smartphone. Electron. Imaging. 2017, 212–217. doi: 10.2352/ISSN.2470-1173.2017.14.HVEI-146

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Han, P. H., Hsieh, C. E., Chen, Y. S., Hsiao, J. C., Lee, K. C., Ko, S. F., et al. (2017). “AoEs: enhancing teleportation experience in immersive environment with mid-air haptics,” in ACM SIGGRAPH 2017 Emerging Technologies (New York, NY: Association for Computing Machinery), p. 1–2. (SIGGRAPH '17). doi: 10.1145/3084822.3084823

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Harding, J. L., Backholer, K., Williams, E. D., Peeters, A., Cameron, A. J., Hare, M. J., et al. (2014). Psychosocial stress is positively associated with body mass index gain over 5 years: evidence from the longitudinal AusDiab study. Obesity 22, 277–286. doi: 10.1002/oby.20423

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Harrington, J., Williams, B., and Headleand, C. A. (2019). “Somatic approach to combating cybersickness utilising airflow feedback,” in Computer Graphics and Visual Computing (CGVC) (Bangor), 9. doi: 10.2312/cgvc.20191256

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Hart, S. G. (2006). Nasa-Task Load Index (NASA-TLX); 20 years later. Proc. Hum. Factors Ergon. Soc. Ann. Meet. 50, 904–908. doi: 10.1177/154193120605000909

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Hart, S. G., and Staveland, L. E. (1988). “Development of NASA-TLX (Task Load Index): results of empirical and theoretical research,” in Advances in Psychology, eds P. A. Hancock, and N. Meshkati (North-Holland: Elsevier), 139–183. (Human Mental Workload; vol. 52). doi: 10.1016/S0166-4115(08)62386-9

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Hasnain, A., Laffont, P. Y., Jalil, S. B. A., Buyukburc, K., Guillemet, P. Y., Wirajaya, S., et al. (2019). “Piezo-actuated varifocal head-mounted displays for virtual and augmented reality,” in Advances in Display Technologies IX. International Society for Optics and Photonics, 1094207. Available online at: https://www.spiedigitallibrary.org/conference-proceedings-of-spie/10942/1094207/Piezo-actuated-varifocal-head-mounted-displays-for-virtual-and-augmented/10.1117/12.2509143.short (accessed October 22, 2020).

Google Scholar

Hedblom, M., Gunnarsson, B., Iravani, B., Knez, I., Schaefer, M., Thorsson, P., et al. (2019). Reduction of physiological stress by urban green space in a multisensory virtual experiment. Sci Rep. 9, 10113. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-46099-7

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Heidarimoghadam, R., Mohammadfam, I., Babamiri, M., Soltanian, A. R., Khotanlou, H., Sohrabi, M. S., et al. (2020). Study protocol and baseline results for a quasi-randomized control trial: an investigation on the effects of ergonomic interventions on work-related musculoskeletal disorders, quality of work-life and productivity in knowledge-based companies. Int. J. Ind. Ergon. 80, 103030. doi: 10.1016/j.ergon.2020.103030

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Helminen, E. C., Morton, M. L., Wang, Q., and Felver, J. C. (2019). A. meta-analysis of cortisol reactivity to the Trier Social Stress Test in virtual environments. Psychoneuroendocrinology 110, 104437. doi: 10.1016/j.psyneuen.2019.104437

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Hemmerich, W., Keshavarz, B., and Hecht, H. (2020). Visually induced motion sickness on the horizon. Front. Virtual Real. 1, 582095. doi: 10.3389/frvir.2020.582095

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Hendy, K. C., Liao, J., and Milgram, P. (1997). Combining time and intensity effects in assessing operator information-processing load. Hum. Factors 39, 30–47. doi: 10.1518/001872097778940597

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Hertzum, M. (2021). Reference values and subscale patterns for the task load index (TLX): a meta-analytic review. Ergonomics 64, 869–878. doi: 10.1080/00140139.2021.1876927

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Hess, R. F., To, L., Zhou, J., Wang, G., and Cooperstock, J. R. (2015). Stereo vision: the haves and have-nots. Iperception 6, 204166951559302. doi: 10.1177/2041669515593028

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Hibbard, P. B., van Dam, L. C. J., and Scarfe, P. (2020). The implications of interpupillary distance variability for virtual reality,” in 2020 International Conference on 3D Immersion (IC3D) (Brussels: IEEE), 1–7. doi: 10.1109/IC3D51119.2020.9376369

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Hidalgo, V., Pulopulos, M. M., and Salvador, A. (2019). Acute psychosocial stress effects on memory performance: relevance of age and sex. Neurobiol. Learn. Mem. 157, 48–60. doi: 10.1016/j.nlm.2018.11.013

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Hirota, M., Kanda, H., Endo, T., Miyoshi, T., Miyagawa, S., Hirohara, Y., et al. (2019). Comparison of visual fatigue caused by head-mounted display for virtual reality and two-dimensional display using objective and subjective evaluation. Ergonomics 62, 759–766. doi: 10.1080/00140139.2019.1582805

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Hirschle, A. L. T., Gondim, S. M. G., Hirschle, A. L. T., and Gondim, S. M. G. (2020). Stress and well-being at work: a literature review. Cien. Saude Colet. 25, 2721–2736. doi: 10.1590/1413-81232020257.27902017

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Hirzle, T., Cordts, M., Rukzio, E., and Bulling, A. A. (2020). “Survey of digital eye strain in gaze-based interactive systems,” inACM Symposium on Eye Tracking Research and Applications (New York, NY: Association for Computing Machinery), 1–12. (ETRA '20 Full Papers). doi: 10.1145/3379155.3391313

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Holt, T. J., and Blevins, K. R. (2011). Examining job stress and satisfaction among digital forensic examiners. J. Contemp. Crim. Justice 27, 230–250. doi: 10.1177/1043986211405899

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Howard, M. C., and Van Zandt, E. C. (2021). A meta-analysis of the virtual reality problem: unequal effects of virtual reality sickness across individual differences. Virtual Real. 25, 1221–1246. doi: 10.1007/s10055-021-00524-3

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Hsu, H. C. (2019). Age differences in work stress, exhaustion, well-being, and related factors from an ecological perspective. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health. 16, 50. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16010050

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Hu, P., Sun, Q., Didyk, P., Wei, L. Y., and Kaufman, A. E. (2019). Reducing simulator sickness with perceptual camera control. ACM Trans. Graph. 38, 210:1–210:12. doi: 10.1145/3355089.3356490

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Huang, Q., Yang, M., Jane, H., Li, S., and Bauer, N. (2020). Trees, grass, or concrete? The effects of different types of environments on stress reduction. Landsc. Urban Plann. 193, 103654. doi: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2019.103654

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Hussain, R., Chessa, M., and Solari, F. (2020). “Modelling foveated depth-of-field blur for improving depth perception in virtual reality,” in 2020 IEEE 4th International Conference on Image Processing, Applications and Systems (IPAS) (Genova: IEEE), 71–76. doi: 10.1109/IPAS50080.2020.9334947

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Hussain, R., Chessa, M., and Solari, F. (2021). Mitigating cybersickness in virtual reality systems through foveated depth-of-field blur. Sensors 21, 4006. doi: 10.3390/s21124006

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Hwang, A. D., and Peli, E. (2020). Stereoscopic three-dimensional optic flow distortions caused by mismatches between image acquisition and display parameters. Electron. Imaging 60412–1–60412–7. doi: 10.2352/J.ImagingSci.Technol.2019.63.6.060412

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Isaza, M., Zhang, J., Kim, K., Mei, C., and Guo, R. (2019). “Mono-stereoscopic camera in a virtual reality environment: case study in cybersickness,” in 2019 11th International Conference on Virtual Worlds and Games for Serious Applications (VS-Games) (Vienna: IEEE), 1–4. doi: 10.1109/VS-Games.2019.8864578

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Iskander, J., Hossny, M., and Nahavandi, S. (2019). Using biomechanics to investigate the effect of VR on eye vergence system. Appl. Ergon. 81, 102883. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2019.102883

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Iskander, J., Jia, D., Hettiarachchi, I., Hossny, M., Saleh, K., Nahavandi, S., et al. (2018). “Age-related effects of multi-screen setup on task performance and eye movement characteristics,” in 2018 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics (SMC) (Miyazaki: IEEE), 3480–3485. doi: 10.1109/SMC.2018.00589

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Islam, R., Lee, Y., Jaloli, M., Muhammad, I., Zhu, D., Rad, P., et al. (2020). “Automatic detection and prediction of cybersickness severity using deep neural networks from user's physiological signals,” in 2020 IEEE International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality (ISMAR) (Porto de Galinhas: IEEE), 400–411. doi: 10.1109/ISMAR50242.2020.00066

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Ito, K., Tada, M., Ujike, H., and Hyodo, K. (2019). “Effects of weight and balance of head mounted display on physical load,” in Virtual, Augmented and Mixed Reality Multimodal Interaction, eds J. Y. C. Chen, and G. Fragomeni (Cham: Springer International Publishing), 450–460. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-21607-8_35

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Jacobs, J., Wang, X., and Alexa, M. (2019). Keep it simple: depth-based dynamic adjustment of rendering for head-mounted displays decreases visual comfort. ACM Trans. Appl. Percept. 16, 16:1–16:16. doi: 10.1145/3353902

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Jahncke, H., and Hallman, D. M. (2020). Objective measures of cognitive performance in activity based workplaces and traditional office types. J. Environ. Psychol. 72, 101503. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2020.101503

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Janeh, O., Langbehn, E., Steinicke, F., Bruder, G., Gulberti, A., Poetter-Nerger, M., et al. (2017). Walking in virtual reality: effects of manipulated visual self-motion on walking biomechanics. ACM Trans. Appl. Percept. 14, 12:1–12:15. doi: 10.1145/3022731

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Jeon, H. S., and Choi, H. Y. (2019). “Binocular function test,” in Primary Eye Examination: A Comprehensive Guide to Diagnosis, ed J. S. Lee (Singapore: Springer), 71–82. doi: 10.1007/978-981-10-6940-6_6

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Jeong, D., Yoo, S., and Yun, J. (2019). “Cybersickness analysis with EEG using deep learning algorithms,” in 2019 IEEE Conference on Virtual Reality and 3D User Interfaces (VR) (Osaka: IEEE), 827–835. doi: 10.1109/VR.2019.8798334

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Jones, J. A., Dukes, L. C., Krum, D. M., Bolas, M. T., and Hodges, L. F. (2015). “Correction of geometric distortions and the impact of eye position in virtual reality displays,” in 2015 International Conference on Collaboration Technologies and Systems (CTS) (Atlanta, GA: IEEE), 77–83. doi: 10.1109/CTS.2015.7210403

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Kaplan, A. D., Cruit, J., Endsley, M., Beers, S. M., Sawyer, B. D., Hancock, P. A., et al. (2020). The effects of virtual reality, augmented reality, and mixed reality as training enhancement methods: a meta-analysis. Hum. Factors 63, 706–726. doi: 10.1177/0018720820904229

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Kara, D. D., Ring, M., Hennig, F. F., and Michelson, G. (2020). Effects of mild traumatic brain injury on stereopsis detected by a virtual reality system: attempt to develop a screening test. J. Med. Biol. Eng. 40, 639–647. doi: 10.1007/s40846-020-00542-7

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Keller, K., and Colucci, D. (1998). “Perception in HMDs: what is it in head-mounted displays (HMDs) that really make them all so terrible?” in Proceedings Volume 3362, Helmet- and Head-Mounted Displays III (Orlando, FL), 46–53. doi: 10.1117/12.317454

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Kelsen, B. A. (2019). Exploring public speaking anxiety and personal disposition in EFL presentations. Learn. Individ. Differ. 73, 92–101. doi: 10.1016/j.lindif.2019.05.003

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Kemeny, A., Chardonnet, J. R., and Colombet, F. (2020). Getting Rid of Cybersickness: In Virtual Reality, Augmented Reality, and Simulators. Cham: Springer International Publishing. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-59342-1

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Kenny, G. P., Groeller, H., McGinn, R., and Flouris, A. D. (2016). Age, human performance, and physical employment standards. Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. 41(6 (Suppl. 2)), S92–S107. doi: 10.1139/apnm-2015-0483

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Keown, G. A., and Tuchin, P. A. (2018). Workplace factors associated with neck pain experienced by computer users: a systematic review. J. Manipulative Physiol. Ther. 41, 508–529. doi: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2018.01.005

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Kerous, B., Barteček, R., Roman, R., Sojka, P., Bečev, O., and Liarokapis, F. Examination of electrodermal cardio-vascular reactivity in virtual reality through a combined stress induction protocol. J. Ambient. Intell. Hum. Comput. (2020) 11, 6033–6042. doi: 10.1007/s12652-020-01858-7.

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Keshavarz, B., Hecht, H., and Lawson, B. (2014). Visually induced motion sickness: Characteristics, causes, and countermeasures,” in Handbook of Virtual Environments: Design, Implementation, and Applications, eds K. M. Stanney, and K. S. Hale (New York, NY: Taylor & Francis), 648–697.

Google Scholar

Keshavarz, B., Murovec, B., Mohanathas, N., and Golding, J. F. (2021). The Visually Induced Motion Sickness Susceptibility Questionnaire (VIMSSQ): Estimating Individual Susceptibility to Motion Sickness-Like Symptoms When Using Visual Devices: Human Factors. Available online at: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/suppl/10.1177/00187208211008687 (accessed May 19, 2021).

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

Khakurel, J., Melkas, H., and Porras, J. (2018). Tapping into the wearable device revolution in the work environment: a systematic review. Inf. Technol. People 31, 791–818. doi: 10.1108/ITP-03-2017-0076

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Kim, E., and Shin, G. (2018). Head rotation and muscle activity when conducting document editing tasks with a head-mounted display. Proc. Hum. Factors Ergon. Soc. Ann. Meet. 62, 952–955. doi: 10.1177/1541931218621219

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Kim, H., Kim, D. J., Chung, W. H., Park, K. A., Kim, J. D. K., Kim, D., et al. (2021). Clinical predictors of cybersickness in virtual reality (VR) among highly stressed people. Sci. Rep. 11, 12139. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-91573-w

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Kim, J., Luu, W., and Palmisano, S. (2020). Multisensory integration and the experience of scene instability, presence and cybersickness in virtual environments. Comput. Hum. Behav. 113, 106484. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2020.106484

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Kim, J., Palmisano, S., Luu, W., and Iwasaki, S. (2021). Effects of linear visual-vestibular conflict on presence, perceived scene stability and cybersickness in the oculus go and oculus quest. Front Virtual Real. 2, 582156. doi: 10.3389/frvir.2021.582156

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Kim, J., and Park, T. (2020). The onset threshold of cybersickness in constant and accelerating optical flow. Appl. Sci. 10, 7808. doi: 10.3390/app10217808

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Kim, J. Y., Kim, S. H., and So, G. J. (2016). The modeling of color fatigue in 3-dimensional stereoscopic video. IJCTE. 8, 229–234. doi: 10.7763/IJCTE.2016.V8.1049

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Kim, R., Roberson, L., Russo, M., and Briganti, P. (2019). Language diversity, nonnative accents, and their consequences at the workplace: recommendations for individuals, teams, and organizations. J. Appl. Behav. Sci. 55, 73–95. doi: 10.1177/0021886318800997

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Kim, S., Alison, L., and Christiansen, P. (2020). The impact of individual differences on investigative hypothesis generation under time pressure. Int. J. Police Sci. Manag. 22, 171–182. doi: 10.1177/1461355720905716

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Kim, Y. B., Jung, D., Park, J., and Lee, J. Y. (2017). Sensitivity to cutaneous warm stimuli varies greatly in the human head. J. Therm. Biol. 69, 132–138. doi: 10.1016/j.jtherbio.2017.07.005

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Kirollos, R., and Herdman, C. M. (2021). Measuring circular vection speed in a virtual reality headset. Displays 69, 102049. doi: 10.1016/j.displa.2021.102049

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Kirschner, P. A. (2017). Stop propagating the learning styles myth. Comput. Educ. 106, 166–171. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2016.12.006

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Klier, C., Buratto, L. G., Klier, C., and Buratto, L. G. (2020). Stress and long-term memory retrieval: a systematic review. Trends Psychiatry Psychother. 42, 284–291. doi: 10.1590/2237-6089-2019-0077

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Klosterhalfen, S., Kellermann, S., Pan, F., Stockhorst, U., Hall, G., Enck, P., et al. (2005). Effects of ethnicity and gender on motion sickness susceptibility. Aviat. Space Environ. Med. 76, 1051–1057.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

Knierim, P., and Schmidt, A. (2020). The Virtual Office of the Future: Are Centralized Workplaces Obsolete? Available online at: https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/research/publication/the-virtual-office-of-the-future-are-centralized-workplaces-obsolete/ (accessed April 6, 2021).

Koctekin, B., Coban, D. T., Ozen, M., Tekindal, M. A., Unal, A. C., Altintas, A. G. K., et al. (2020). Investigation of relationship between colour discrimination ability and stereoscopic acuity using Farnsworth Munsell 100 hue test and stereo tests. Can. J. Ophthalmol. 55, 131–136. doi: 10.1016/j.jcjo.2019.07.013

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Kongsilp, S., and Dailey, M. N. (2017). Motion parallax from head movement enhances stereoscopic displays by improving presence and decreasing visual fatigue. Displays 49, 72–79. doi: 10.1016/j.displa.2017.07.001

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Koohestani, A., Nahavandi, D., Asadi, H., Kebria, P. M., Khosravi, A., Alizadehsani, R., et al. (2019). A knowledge discovery in motion sickness: a comprehensive literature review. IEEE Access. 7, 85755–85770. doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2922993

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Korporaal, M., Ruginski, I. T., and Fabrikant, S. I. (2020). Effects of uncertainty visualization on map-based decision making under time pressure. Front. Comput. Sci. 2, 32. doi: 10.3389/fcomp.2020.00032

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Kourtesis, P., Collina, S., Doumas, L. A. A., and MacPherson, S. E. (2019). Technological competence is a pre-condition for effective implementation of virtual reality head mounted displays in human neuroscience: a technological review and meta-analysis. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 13, 42. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2019.00342

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Kourtesis, P., Korre, D., Collina, S., Doumas, L. A. A., and MacPherson, S. E. (2020). Guidelines for the development of immersive virtual reality software for cognitive neuroscience and neuropsychology: the development of Virtual Reality Everyday Assessment Lab (VR-EAL), a neuropsychological test battery in immersive virtual reality. Front. Comput. Sci. 1, 12. doi: 10.3389/fcomp.2019.00012

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Kouvonen, A., Kivimäki, M., Cox, S. J., Cox, T., and Vahtera, J. (2005). Relationship between work stress and body mass index among 45,810 female and male employees. Psychosom. Med. 67, 577–583. doi: 10.1097/01.psy.0000170330.08704.62

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Kuiper, O. X., Bos, J. E., and Diels, C. (2019). Vection does not necessitate visually induced motion sickness. Displays 58, 82–87. doi: 10.1016/j.displa.2018.10.001

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Kweon, S. H., Kweon, H. J., Kim, S. j., Li, X., Liu, X., Kweon, H. L., et al. (2018). “A brain wave research on VR (virtual reality) usage: comparison between VR and 2D video in EEG measurement,” in Advances in Human Factors and Systems Interaction AHFE 2017. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, Vol. 592, ed I. Nunes (Cham: Springer), 194–203. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-60366-7_19

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Kwok, K. K. K., Ng, A. K. T., and Lau, H. Y. K. (2018). “Effect of navigation speed and VR devices on cybersickness,” in 2018 IEEE International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality Adjunct (ISMAR-Adjunct) (Munich: IEEE), 91–92. doi: 10.1109/ISMAR-Adjunct.2018.00041

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Labuschagne, I., Grace, C., Rendell, P., Terrett, G., and Heinrichs, M. (2019). An introductory guide to conducting the Trier Social Stress Test. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 107, 686–695. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2019.09.032

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Lackner, J. R. (2014). Motion sickness: more than nausea and vomiting. Exp. Brain Res. 232, 2493–2510. doi: 10.1007/s00221-014-4008-8

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Lambooij, M., and IJsselsteijn, W. (2009). Measuring Visual Discomfort Associated with 3D Displays. San Jose, CA. doi: 10.1117/2.1200905.1653

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Lambooij, M., IJsselsteijn, W., Fortuin, M., and Heynderickx, I. (2009). Visual discomfort and visual fatigue of stereoscopic displays: a review. J. Imaging Sci. Technol. 53, 1–14. doi: 10.2352/J.ImagingSci.Technol.2009.53.3.030201

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Lanier, M., Waddell, T. F., Elson, M., Tamul, D., Ivory, J. D., Przybylski, A. K., et al. (2019). Virtual reality check: statistical power, reported results, and the validity of research on the psychology of virtual reality and immersive environments. Comput. Hum. Behav. 100, 70–78. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2019.06.015

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Larese Filon, F., Drusian, A., Ronchese, F., and Negro, C. (2019). Video display operator complaints: a 10-year follow-up of visual fatigue and refractive disorders. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 16, 2501. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16142501

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

LaViola, JJ, Kruijff, E, McMahan, RP, Bowman, DA, and Poupyrev, I. (2017). 3D User Interfaces: Theory and Practice, 2nd ed. New York, NY: Addison-Wesley, 591. p. (Pearson always learning).

Google Scholar

LaViola, J. J. (2000). A discussion of cybersickness in virtual environments. ACM SIGCHI Bull. 32, 47–56. doi: 10.1145/333329.333344

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Lavoie, R., Main, K., King, C., and King, D. (2020). Virtual experience, real consequences: the potential negative emotional consequences of virtual reality gameplay. Virtual Real. 25, 69–81. doi: 10.1007/s10055-020-00440-y

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Le, P., Weisenbach, C. A., Mills, E. H. L., Monforton, L., and Kinney, M. J. (2021). Exploring the interaction between head-supported mass, posture, and visual stress on neck muscle activation. Hum. Factors 65, 365–381. doi: 10.1177/00187208211019154

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

LeBlanc, V. R. (2009). The effects of acute stress on performance: implications for health professions education. Acad. Med. 84, S25. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e3181b37b8f

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Leccese, F., Rocca, M., Salvadori, G., Oner, M., Burattini, C., Bisegna, F., et al. (2021). Laptop displays performance: compliance assessment with visual ergonomics requirements. Displays 68, 102019. doi: 10.1016/j.displa.2021.102019

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Lee, D. H., and Han, S. K. (2018). Effects of watching virtual reality and 360° videos on erector spinae and upper trapezius muscle fatigue and cervical flexion-extension angle. KSPE. 35, 1107–1114. doi: 10.7736/KSPE.2018.35.11.1107

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Lee, J., Kim, D., Sul, H., and Ko, S. H. (2020). Thermo-haptic materials and devices for wearable virtual and augmented reality. Adv. Funct. Mater. 31, 2007376. doi: 10.1002/adfm.202007376

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Lee, K., and Choo, H. (2013). A critical review of selective attention: an interdisciplinary perspective. Artif. Intell. Rev. 40, 27–50. doi: 10.1007/s10462-011-9278-y

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Lee, S., Kang, H., and Shin, G. (2015). Head flexion angle while using a smartphone. Ergonomics 58, 220–226. doi: 10.1080/00140139.2014.967311

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Legan, M., and Zupan, K. (2020). Prevalence of mobile device-related lower extremity discomfort: a systematic review. Int. J. Occup. Saf. Ergon. 28, 1091–1103. doi: 10.1080/10803548.2020.1863657

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Leroy, L. (2016). Eyestrain Reduction in Stereoscopy. London: Wiley-ISTE. doi: 10.1002/9781119318330

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Li, C., Sun, C., Sun, M., Yuan, Y., and Li, P. (2020). Effects of brightness levels on stress recovery when viewing a virtual reality forest with simulated natural light. Urban For. Urban Green. 56, 126865. doi: 10.1016/j.ufug.2020.126865

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Li, G., Rempel, D., Liu, Y., and Harris-Adamson, C. (2020). The design and assignment of microgestures to commands for virtual and augmented reality tasks. Proc. Hum. Factors Ergon. Soc. Ann. Meet. 64, 2061–2063. doi: 10.1177/1071181320641498

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Li, M., Ganni, S., Ponten, J., Albayrak, A., Rutkowski, A., Jakimowicz, J., et al. (2020). “Analysing usability and presence of a virtual reality operating room (VOR) simulator during laparoscopic surgery training,” in 2020 IEEE Conference on Virtual Reality and 3D User Interfaces (VR), 566–572. doi: 10.1109/VR46266.2020.1581301697128

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Li, W., Yi, G., Chen, Z., Dai, X., Wu, J., Peng, Y., et al. (2021). Is job strain associated with a higher risk of type 2 diabetes mellitus? A systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies. Scand. J. Work Environ. Health 47, 249–257. doi: 10.5271/sjweh.3938

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Lim, H. K., Kim, H., Jang, T., and Lee, Y. (2013). Research trends of international guides for human error prevention in nuclear power plants. J. Ergon. Soc. Korea 32, 125–137. doi: 10.5143/JESK.2013.32.1.125

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Lim, Y. H., Kim, J. S., Lee, H. W., and Kim, S. H. (2018). Postural instability induced by visual motion stimuli in patients with vestibular migraine. Front. Neurol. 9, 433. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2018.00433

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Lin, C. J., Cheng, L. Y., and Yang, C. W. (2021). An investigation of the influence of age on eye fatigue and hand operation performance in a virtual environment. Vis. Comput. 37, 2301–2313. doi: 10.1007/s00371-020-01987-2

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Lin, C. W., Hanselaer, P., and Smet, K. A. G. (2020). Relationship between perceived room brightness and light source appearance mode in different media: reality, virtual reality and 2D images. Color Imaging Conf. 2000, 30–35. doi: 10.2352/issn.2169-2629.2020.28.6

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Lin, M. I. B., Hong, R. H., and Huang, Y. P. (2020). Influence of virtual keyboard design and usage posture on typing performance and muscle activity during tablet interaction. Ergonomics 63, 1312–1328. doi: 10.1080/00140139.2020.1778097

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Lin, Y. X., Venkatakrishnan, R., Venkatakrishnan, R., Ebrahimi, E., Lin, W. C., Babu, S. V., et al. (2020). How the presence and size of static peripheral blur affects cybersickness in virtual reality. ACM Trans. Appl. Percept. 17, 16.1–16.18. doi: 10.1145/3419984

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Litleskare, S. (2021). The relationship between postural stability and cybersickness: it's complicated – an experimental trial assessing practical implications of cybersickness etiology. Physiol. Behav. 236, 113422. doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2021.113422

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Liu, M. Y., Li, N., Li, W. A., and Khan, H. (2017). Association between psychosocial stress and hypertension: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Neurol. Res. 39, 573–580. doi: 10.1080/01616412.2017.1317904

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Liu, P., and Li, Z. (2020). Quantitative relationship between time margin and human reliability. Int. J. Ind. Ergon. 78, 102977. doi: 10.1016/j.ergon.2020.102977

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Liu, S. H., Yu, N. H., Chan, L., Peng, Y. H., Sun, W. Z., Chen, M. Y., et al. (2019). “PhantomLegs: reducing virtual reality sickness using head-worn haptic devices,” in 2019 IEEE Conference on Virtual Reality and 3D User Interfaces (VR) (Osaka: IEEE), 817–826. doi: 10.1109/VR.2019.8798158

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Liu, T., Lin, C. C., Huang, K. C., and Chen, Y. C. (2017). Effects of noise type, noise intensity, and illumination intensity on reading performance. Appl. Acoust. 120, 70–74. doi: 10.1016/j.apacoust.2017.01.019

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Liu, Y., Guo, X., Fan, Y., Meng, X., and Wang, J. (2021a). Subjective assessment on visual fatigue versus stereoscopic disparities. J. Soc. Inf. Disp. 29, 497–504. doi: 10.1002/jsid.991

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Liu, Y., Nishikawa, S., Seong, Y., Niiyama, R., and Kuniyoshi, Y. (2021b). “ThermoCaress: a wearable haptic device with illusory moving thermal stimulation,” in Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (New York, NY: Association for Computing Machinery), 1–12. doi: 10.1145/3411764.3445777

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Lu, X., Yu, D., Liang, H. N., Feng, X., and Xu, W. (2019). “DepthText: leveraging head movements towards the depth dimension for hands-free text entry in mobile virtual reality systems,” in 2019 IEEE Conference on Virtual Reality and 3D User Interfaces (VR) (Osaka: IEEE), 1060–1061. doi: 10.1109/VR.2019.8797901

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Ludick, M., and Figley, C. R. (2017). Toward a mechanism for secondary trauma induction and reduction: reimagining a theory of secondary traumatic stress. Traumatology 23, 112–123. doi: 10.1037/trm0000096

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

MacArthur, C., Grinberg, A., Harley, D., and Hancock, M. (2021). “You're making me sick: a systematic review of how virtual reality research considers gender and cybersickness,” in Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (New York, NY: Association for Computing Machinery), 1–15. (CHI '21). doi: 10.1145/3411764.3445701

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Magnusson Hanson, L. L., Westerlund, H., Goldberg, M., Zins, M., Vahtera, J., Hulvej Rod, N., et al. (2017). Work stress, anthropometry, lung function, blood pressure, and blood-based biomarkers: a cross-sectional study of 43,593 French men and women. Sci. Rep. 7, 9282. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-07508-x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Mahdavi, N., Dianat, I., Heidarimoghadam, R., Khotanlou, H., and Faradmal, J. (2020). A review of work environment risk factors influencing muscle fatigue. Int. J. Ind. Ergon. 80, 103028. doi: 10.1016/j.ergon.2020.103028

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Main, L. C., Wolkow, A., and Chambers, T. P. (2017). Quantifying the physiological stress response to simulated maritime pilotage tasks: the influence of task complexity and pilot experience. J. Occup. Environ. Med. 59, 1078–1083. doi: 10.1097/JOM.0000000000001161

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Majaranta, P. (2012). “Communication and text entry by gaze,” in Gaze Interaction and Applications of Eye Tracking: Advances in Assistive Technologies, eds P. Majaranta, H. Aoki, M. Donegan, D. W. Hansen, J. P. Hansen, A. Hyrskykari, et al. (Hershey, PA: IGI Global), 63–77. doi: 10.4018/978-1-61350-098-9.ch008

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Majaranta, P., and Bulling, A. (2014). “Eye tracking and eye-based human–computer interaction,” in Advances in Physiological Computing, eds S. H. Fairclough, and K. Gilleade (London: Springer London), 39–65. (Human–Computer Interaction Series). doi: 10.1007/978-1-4471-6392-3_3

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Makransky, G., Terkildsen, T. S., and Mayer, R. E. (2019). Adding immersive virtual reality to a science lab simulation causes more presence but less learning. Learn. Instr. 60, 225–236. doi: 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2017.12.007

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Marcel, M. (2019). Communication apprehension across the career span. Int. J. Bus. Commun. 59, 2329488419856803. doi: 10.1177/2329488419856803

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Marchiori, D. M., Mainardes, E. W., and Rodrigues, R. G. (2019). Do individual characteristics influence the types of technostress reported by workers? Int. J. Hum.–Comput. Interact. 35, 218–230. doi: 10.1080/10447318.2018.1449713

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Marsh, J. E., Ljung, R., Jahncke, H., MacCutcheon, D., Pausch, F., Ball, L. J., et al. (2018). Why are background telephone conversations distracting? J. Exp. Psychol. Appl. 24, 222–235. doi: 10.1037/xap0000170

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Marshev, V., Bolloc'h, J., Pallamin, N., de Bougrenet de la Tocnaye, J. L., Cochener, B., and Nourrit, V. (2021). Impact of virtual reality headset use on eye blinking and lipid layer thickness. J. Fr. 44, 1029–1037. doi: 10.1016/j.jfo.2020.09.032

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Matsuda, Y., Nakamura, J., Amemiya, T., Ikei, Y., and Kitazaki, M. (2021). Enhancing virtual walking sensation using self-avatar in first-person perspective and foot vibrations. Front. Virtual Real. 2, 654088. doi: 10.3389/frvir.2021.654088

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Matsuura, Y. (2019). “Aftereffect of stereoscopic viewing on human body II,” in Stereopsis and Hygiene, eds H. Takada, M. Miyao, and S. Fateh (Singapore: Springer), 89–99. (Current Topics in Environmental Health and Preventive Medicine). doi: 10.1007/978-981-13-1601-2_8

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

McCoy, S. K., Hutchinson, S., Hawthorne, L., Cosley, B. J., and Ell, S. W. (2014). Is pressure stressful? The impact of pressure on the stress response and category learning. Cogn. Affect. Behav. Neurosci. 14, 769–781. doi: 10.3758/s13415-013-0215-1

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Mcgill, M., Kehoe, A., Freeman, E., and Brewster, S. (2020). Expanding the bounds of seated virtual workspaces. ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact. 27, 13:1–13:40. doi: 10.1145/3380959

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Mcmullan, R. D., Urwin, R., Gates, P., Sunderland, N., and Westbrook, J. I. (2021). Are operating room distractions, interruptions and disruptions associated with performance and patient safety? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Int. J. Qual. Health Care. 33, mzab068. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzab068

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Mehta, R. K., and Cavuoto, L. A. (2017). Relationship between BMI and fatigability is task dependent. Hum. Factors 59, 722–733. doi: 10.1177/0018720817695194

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Melzer, J., Brozoski, F., Letowski, T., Harding, T., and Rash, C. (2009). “Guidelines for HMD design,” in Helmet-Mounted Displays: Sensation, Perception and Cognition Issues, ed C. E. Rash (Fort Novosel, AL: U.S. Army Aeromedical Research Laboratory), 805–848. doi: 10.1037/e614362011-018

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Meng, X., Du, R., and Varshney, A. (2020). Eye-dominance-guided foveated rendering. IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph. 26, 1972–1980. doi: 10.1109/TVCG.2020.2973442

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Merhi, O., Faugloire, E., Flanagan, M., and Stoffregen, T. A. (2007). Motion sickness, console video games, and head-mounted displays. Hum. Factors 49, 920–934. doi: 10.1518/001872007X230262

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Milleville-Pennel, I., Mars, F., and Pouliquen-Lardy, L. (2020). Sharing spatial information in a virtual environment: how do visual cues and configuration influence spatial coding and mental workload? Virtual Real. 24, 695–712. doi: 10.1007/s10055-020-00430-0

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Minutillo, S., Cleary, M., and Visentin, D. (2021). Employee well-being in open-plan office spaces. Issues Ment. Health Nurs. 42, 103–105. doi: 10.1080/01612840.2020.1865072

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Mittelstaedt, J., Wacker, J., and Stelling, D. (2018). Effects of display type and motion control on cybersickness in a virtual bike simulator. Displays 51, 43–50. doi: 10.1016/j.displa.2018.01.002

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Mittelstaedt, J. M. (2020). Individual predictors of the susceptibility for motion-related sickness: a systematic review. J. Vestib. Res. 30, 165–193. doi: 10.3233/VES-200702

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Mittelstaedt, J. M., Wacker, J., and Stelling, D. (2019). VR. aftereffect and the relation of cybersickness and cognitive performance. Virtual Real. 23, 143–154. doi: 10.1007/s10055-018-0370-3

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Modi, H. N., Singh, H., Darzi, A., and Leff, D. R. (2020). Multitasking and time pressure in the operating room: impact on surgeons' brain function. Ann. Surg. 272, 648–657. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000004208

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Mohler, B. J., Thompson, W. B., Creem-Regehr, S. H., Pick, H. L., and Warren, W. H. (2007). Visual flow influences gait transition speed and preferred walking speed. Exp. Brain Res. 181, 221–228. doi: 10.1007/s00221-007-0917-0

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Molnar, B. E., Sprang, G., Killian, K. D., Gottfried, R., Emery, V., Bride, B. E., et al. (2017). Advancing science and practice for vicarious traumatization/secondary traumatic stress: a research agenda. Traumatology 23, 129–142. doi: 10.1037/trm0000122

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Moran, A. (1763). “Concentration: attention and performance,” in The Oxford Handbook of Sport and Performance Psychology, 1st ed., ed S. M. Murphy (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 117–130.

Google Scholar

Moreira-Silva, I., Santos, R., Abreu, S., and Mota, J. (2013). Associations between body mass index and musculoskeletal pain and related symptoms in different body regions among workers. SAGE Open 3, 2158244013491952. doi: 10.1177/2158244013491952

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Mousavi-Khatir, R., Talebian, S., Toosizadeh, N., Olyaei, G. R., and Maroufi, N. (2018). Disturbance of neck proprioception and feed-forward motor control following static neck flexion in healthy young adults. J. Electromyogr. Kinesiol. 41, 160–167. doi: 10.1016/j.jelekin.2018.04.013

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Munsamy, A. J., and Chetty, V. (2020). Digital eye syndrome : COVID-19 lockdown side-effect? S. Afr. Med. J. 110, 569–569. doi: 10.7196/SAMJ.2020.v110i7.14906

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Muthukrishna, M., and Henrich, J. (2019). A problem in theory. Nat. Hum. Behav. 3, 221–229. doi: 10.1038/s41562-018-0522-1

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Myers, S., Govindarajulu, U., Joseph, M. A., and Landsbergis, P. (2021). Work characteristics, body mass index, and risk of obesity: the national quality of work life survey. Ann. Work Exp. Health 65, 291–306. doi: 10.1093/annweh/wxaa098

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Nakajima, Y., Tanaka, N., Mima, T., and Izumi, S. I. (2016). Stress recovery effects of high- and low-frequency amplified music on heart rate variability. Behav. Neurol. 2016, e5965894. doi: 10.1155/2016/5965894

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Narciso, D., Bessa, M., Melo, M., and Vasconcelos-Raposo, J. (2019). “Virtual reality for training - the impact of smell on presence, cybersickness, fatigue, stress and knowledge transfer,” in 2019 International Conference on Graphics and Interaction (ICGI) (Faro: IEEE), 115–121. doi: 10.1109/ICGI47575.2019.8955071

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Narvaez Linares, N. F., Charron, V., Ouimet, A. J., Labelle, P. R., and Plamondon, H. (2020). A systematic review of the Trier Social Stress Test methodology: issues in promoting study comparison and replicable research. Neurobiol. Stress 13, 100235. doi: 10.1016/j.ynstr.2020.100235

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Nesbitt, K., and Nalivaiko, E. (2018). “Cybersickness,” in Encyclopedia of Computer Graphics and Games, ed N. Lee (Cham: Springer International Publishing), 1–6. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-08234-9_252-1

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Nichols, S. (1999). Physical ergonomics of virtual environment use. Appl Ergon. 30, 79–90. doi: 10.1016/S0003-6870(98)00045-3

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Nichols, S., and Patel, H. (2002). Health and safety implications of virtual reality: a review of empirical evidence. Appl Ergon. 33, 251–271. doi: 10.1016/S0003-6870(02)00020-0

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Nisafani, A. S., Kiely, G., and Mahony, C. (2020). Workers' technostress: a review of its causes, strains, inhibitors, and impacts. J. Decis. Syst. 29, 243–258. doi: 10.1080/12460125.2020.1796286

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

O'Connor, A. R., and Tidbury, L. P. (2018). Stereopsis: are we assessing it in enough depth? Clin. Exp. Optom. 101, 485–494. doi: 10.1111/cxo.12655

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Ofek, E., Grubert, J., Pahud, M., Phillips, M., and Kristensson, P. O. (2020). Towards a Practical Virtual Office for Mobile Knowledge Workers. Available online at: https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/research/publication/towards-a-practical-virtual-office-for-mobile-knowledge-workers/ (accessed June 22, 2021).

Google Scholar

Oh, H., and Lee, G. (2021). Feasibility of full immersive virtual reality video game on balance and cybersickness of healthy adolescents. Neurosci. Lett. 760, 136063. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2021.136063

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Olson, B. V., McGuire, C., and Crawford, A. (2020). “Improving the quality of work life: an interdisciplinary lens into the worker experience,” in The Palgrave Handbook of Workplace Well-Being, ed S. Dhiman (Cham: Springer International Publishing), 1–32. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-02470-3_3-1

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Ooi, T. L., and He, Z. J. (2020). Sensory eye dominance: relationship between eye and brain. Eye Brain 12, 25–31. doi: 10.2147/EB.S176931

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Ordóñez, L. D., Benson, L., and Pittarello, A. (2015). “Time-pressure perception and decision making,” in The Wiley Blackwell Handbook of Judgment and Decision Making, eds G. Keren, and G. Wu (Chichester: John Wiley and Sons), 517–542. doi: 10.1002/9781118468333.ch18

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Pabst, S., Brand, M., and Wolf, O. T. (2013). Stress and decision making: a few minutes make all the difference. Behav. Brain Res. 250, 39–45. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2013.04.046

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Paik, S., Jeon, Y., Shih, P. C., and Han, K. I. (2021). “Feel more engaged when i move!: deep learning-based backward movement detection and its application,” in 2021 IEEE Virtual Reality and 3D User Interfaces (VR) (Lisboa: IEEE), 483–492. doi: 10.1109/VR50410.2021.00072

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Palada, H., Neal, A., Tay, R., and Heathcote, A. (2018). Understanding the causes of adapting, and failing to adapt, to time pressure in a complex multistimulus environment. J. Exp. Psychol. Appl. 24, 380–399. doi: 10.1037/xap0000176

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Palmisano, S., Allison, R. S., and Kim, J. (2020). Cybersickness in head-mounted displays is caused by differences in the user's virtual and physical head pose. Front. Virtual Real. 1, 587698. doi: 10.3389/frvir.2020.587698

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Palmisano, S., Allison, R. S., Schira, M. M., and Barry, R. J. (2015). Future challenges for vection research: definitions, functional significance, measures, and neural bases. Front. Psychol. 6, 193. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00193

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Palmisano, S., Mursic, R., and Kim, J. (2017). Vection and cybersickness generated by head-and-display motion in the Oculus Rift. Displays 46, 1–8. doi: 10.1016/j.displa.2016.11.001

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Palmisano, S., Szalla, L., and Kim, J. (2019). “Monocular viewing protects against cybersickness produced by head movements in the oculus rift,” in 25th ACM Symposium on Virtual Reality Software and Technology (New York, NY: Association for Computing Machinery), 1–2. (VRST '19). doi: 10.1145/3359996.3364699

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Panke, K., Pladere, T., Velina, M., Svede, A., Ikaunieks, G., Krumina, G., et al. (2019). “Ocular performance evaluation: how prolonged near work with virtual and real 3D image modifies our visual system,” in Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Applications of Intelligent Systems (New York, NY: Association for Computing Machinery), 1–5. (APPIS '19). doi: 10.1145/3309772.3309786

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Park, S. H., Lee, P. J., Jung, T., and Swenson, A. (2020). Effects of the aural and visual experience on psycho-physiological recovery in urban and rural environments. Appl. Acoust. 169, 107486. doi: 10.1016/j.apacoust.2020.107486

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Paroz, A., and Potter, L. E. (2017). “Cybersickness and migraine triggers: exploring common ground,” in Proceedings of the 29th Australian Conference on Computer-Human Interaction (New York, NY: Association for Computing Machinery), 417–421. (OZCHI '17). doi: 10.1145/3152771.3156148

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Paroz, A., and Potter, L. E. (2018). “Impact of air flow and a hybrid locomotion system on cybersickness,” in Proceedings of the 30th Australian Conference on Computer-Human Interaction (New York, NY: Association for Computing Machinery), 582–586. (OzCHI '18). doi: 10.1145/3292147.3292229

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Parsons, T. D., Larson, P., Kratz, K., Thiebaux, M., Bluestein, B., Buckwalter, J. G., et al. (2004). Sex differences in mental rotation and spatial rotation in a virtual environment. Neuropsychologia 42, 555–562. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2003.08.014

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Paszkiel, S., Dobrakowski, P., and Łysiak, A. (2020). The impact of different sounds on stress level in the context of EEG, cardiac measures and subjective stress level: a pilot study. Brain Sci. 10, 728. doi: 10.3390/brainsci10100728

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Patney, A., Salvi, M., Kim, J., Kaplanyan, A., Wyman, C., Benty, N., et al. (2016). Towards foveated rendering for gaze-tracked virtual reality. ACM Trans. Graph. 35, 1–11. doi: 10.1145/2980179.2980246

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Patterson, R. (2009). Review paper: human factors of stereo displays: an update. J. Soc. Inf. Display 17, 987. doi: 10.1889/JSID17.12.987

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Patterson, R. E. (2015). “Basics of human binocular vision,” in Human Factors of Stereoscopic 3D Displays, ed R. E. Patterson (London: Springer), 9–21. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4471-6651-1_2

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Paxion, J., Galy, E., and Berthelon, C. (2014). Mental workload and driving. Front Psychol. 5, 1344. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01344

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Penumudi, S. A., Kuppam, V. A., Kim, J. H., and Hwang, J. (2020). The effects of target location on musculoskeletal load, task performance, and subjective discomfort during virtual reality interactions. Appl. Ergon. 84, 103010. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2019.103010

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Perez, L. M., Jones, J., Englert, D. R., and Sachau, D. (2010). Secondary traumatic stress and burnout among law enforcement investigators exposed to disturbing media images. J. Police Crim. Psych. 25, 113–124. doi: 10.1007/s11896-010-9066-7

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Petri, K., Feuerstein, K., Folster, S., Bariszlovich, F., and Witte, K. (2020). Effects of age, gender, familiarity with the content, and exposure time on cybersickness in immersive head-mounted display based virtual reality. Am. J. Biomed. Sci. 12, 107–121. doi: 10.5099/aj200200107

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Piano, M. E. F., Tidbury, L. P., and O'Connor, A. R. (2016). Normative values for near and distance clinical tests of stereoacuity. Strabismus 24, 169–172. doi: 10.1080/09273972.2016.1242636

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Pietroszek, K. (2015). 3D Pointing with Everyday Devices: Speed, Occlusion, Fatigue [PhD Thesis]. Waterloo, ON: University of Waterloo.

Google Scholar

Pietroszek, K. (2018). “Virtual hand metaphor in virtual reality,” in Encyclopedia of Computer Graphics and Games, ed N. Lee (Cham: Springer International Publishing), 1–3. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-08234-9_178-1

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Plouzeau, J., Chardonnet, J., and Merienne, F. (2018). “Using cybersickness indicators to adapt navigation in virtual reality: a pre-study,” in 2018 IEEE Conference on Virtual Reality and 3D User Interfaces (VR) (Tuebingen/Reutlingen: IEEE), 661–662. doi: 10.1109/VR.2018.8446192

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Plouzeau, J., Dorado, J. L., Paillot, D., and Merienne, F. (2017). Effect of footstep vibrations and proprioceptive vibrations used with an innovative navigation method,” in 2017 IEEE Symposium on 3D User Interfaces (3DUI) (Los Angeles, CA: IEEE), 241–242. doi: 10.1109/3DUI.2017.7893361

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Pöhlmann, K. M. T., Föcker, J., Dickinson, P., Parke, A., and O'Hare, L. (2021). The effect of motion direction and eccentricity on vection, VR sickness and head movements in virtual reality. Multisens. Res. 34, 623–662. doi: 10.1163/22134808-bja10049

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Porcino, T., Rodrigues, E. O., Silva, A., Clua, E., and Trevisan, D. (2020a). “Using the gameplay and user data to predict and identify causes of cybersickness manifestation in virtual reality games,” in 2020 IEEE 8th International Conference on Serious Games and Applications for Health (SeGAH) (Vancouver, BC: IEEE), 1–8. doi: 10.1109/SeGAH49190.2020.9201649

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Porcino, T., Trevisan, D., and Clua, E. (2020b). “Minimizing cybersickness in head-mounted display systems: causes and strategies review,” in 2020 22nd Symposium on Virtual and Augmented Reality (SVR) (Porto de Galinhas: IEEE), 154–163. doi: 10.1109/SVR51698.2020.00035

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Porcino, T. M., Clua, E., Trevisan, D., Vasconcelos, C. N., and Valente, L. (2017). “Minimizing cyber sickness in head mounted display systems: design guidelines and applications,” in 2017 IEEE 5th International Conference on Serious Games and Applications for Health (SeGAH) (Perth, Australia: IEEE), 1–6. doi: 10.1109/SeGAH.2017.7939283

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Prasad, K., Poplau, S., Brown, R., Yale, S., Grossman, E., Varkey, A. B., et al. (2020). Time pressure during primary care office visits: a prospective evaluation of data from the healthy work place study. J. Gen. Intern. Med. 35, 465–472. doi: 10.1007/s11606-019-05343-6

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Prem, R., Paškvan, M., Kubicek, B., and Korunka, C. (2018). Exploring the ambivalence of time pressure in daily working life. Int. J. Stress Manag. 25, 35–43. doi: 10.1037/str0000044

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Pritchard, S. E., Tse, C. T. F., McDonald, A. C., and Keir, P. J. (2019). Postural and muscular adaptations to repetitive simulated work. Ergonomics 62, 1214–1226. doi: 10.1080/00140139.2019.1626491

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Rabin, J., Cha, C., Nguyen, M., Renteria, L., Abebe, F., Wastani, A., et al. (2020). Cool (blue) vs. warm (yellow) displays enhance visual function. Eye 34, 2347–2348. doi: 10.1038/s41433-020-0793-4

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Radner, W., and Benesch, T. (2019). Age-related course of visual acuity obtained with ETDRS 2000 charts in persons with healthy eyes. Graefes Arch. Clin. Exp. Ophthalmol. 257, 1295–1301. doi: 10.1007/s00417-019-04320-3

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Ramadan, M. Z., and Alhaag, M. H. (2018). Evaluating the user physical stresses associated with watching 3D and 2D displays over extended time using heart rate variability, galvanic skin resistance, and performance measure. J. Sens. 2018, e2632157. doi: 10.1155/2018/2632157

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Ranasinghe, N., Jain, P., Tolley, D., Karwita Tailan, S., Yen, C. C., Do, E. Y. L., et al. (2020). “Exploring the use of olfactory stimuli towards reducing visually induced motion sickness in virtual reality,” in Symposium on Spatial User Interaction (New York, NY: Association for Computing Machinery), 1–9. (SUI '20). doi: 10.1145/3385959.3418451

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Ranasinghe, P., Wathurapatha, W. S., Perera, Y. S., Lamabadusuriya, D. A., Kulatunga, S., Jayawardana, N., et al. (2016). Computer vision syndrome among computer office workers in a developing country: an evaluation of prevalence and risk factors. BMC Res. Notes 9, 150. doi: 10.1186/s13104-016-1962-1

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Rangelova, S., and Andre, E. (2019). A survey on simulation sickness in driving applications with virtual reality head-mounted displays. Presence 27, 15–31. doi: 10.1162/pres_a_00318

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Rangelova, S., Motus, D., and André, E. (2020). “Cybersickness among gamers: an online survey,” inAdvances in Human Factors in Wearable Technologies and Game Design, ed T. Ahram (Cham: Springer International Publishing), 192–201. (Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing). doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-20476-1_20

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Rantala, J., Kangas, J., Koskinen, O., Nukarinen, T., and Raisamo, R. (2021). Comparison of controller-based locomotion techniques for visual observation in virtual reality. Multimodal Technol. Interact. 5, 31. doi: 10.3390/mti5070031

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Rebenitsch, L., and Owen, C. (2014). “Individual variation in susceptibility to cybersickness,” in Proceedings of the 27th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology (New York, NY: Association for Computing Machinery), 309–317. (UIST '14). doi: 10.1145/2642918.2647394

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Rebenitsch, L., and Owen, C. (2016). Review on cybersickness in applications and visual displays. Virtual Real. 20, 101–125. doi: 10.1007/s10055-016-0285-9

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Rebenitsch, L., and Owen, C. (2017). “Evaluating factors affecting virtual reality display,” in Virtual, Augmented and Mixed Reality, eds S. Lackey, and J. Chen (Cham: Springer International Publishing), 544–555. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-57987-0_44

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Rebenitsch, L., and Owen, C. (2021). Estimating cybersickness from virtual reality applications. Virtual Real. 25, 165–174. doi: 10.1007/s10055-020-00446-6

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Reinten, J., Braat-Eggen, P. E., Hornikx, M., Kort, H. S. M., and Kohlrausch, A. (2017). The indoor sound environment and human task performance: a literature review on the role of room acoustics. Build. Environ. 123, 315–332. doi: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2017.07.005

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Rieger, T., Heilmann, L., and Manzey, D. (2021). Visual search behavior and performance in luggage screening: effects of time pressure, automation aid, and target expectancy. Cogn Research. 6, 12. doi: 10.1186/s41235-021-00280-7

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Risi, D., and Palmisano, S. (2019a). “Can we predict susceptibility to cybersickness?” in 25th ACM Symposium on Virtual Reality Software and Technology (New York, NY: Association for Computing Machinery), 1–2. (VRST '19). doi: 10.1145/3359996.3364705

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Risi, D., and Palmisano, S. (2019b). Effects of postural stability, active control, exposure duration and repeated exposures on HMD induced cybersickness. Displays 60, 9–17. doi: 10.1016/j.displa.2019.08.003

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Roesler, R., and McGaugh, J. L. (2019). “Memory consolidation,: in Reference Module in Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Psychology (Amsterdam: Elsevier). Available online at: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/B9780128093245214934 (accessed February 12, 2021).

Google Scholar

Roman-Liu, D., and Tokarski, T. (2021). Age-related differences in bimanual coordination performance. Int. J. Occup. Saf. Ergon. 27, 620–632. doi: 10.1080/10803548.2020.1759296

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Russeng, S. S., Salmah, A. U., Saleh, L. M., Achmad, H., and Nr, A. R. (2020). The influence of workload, body mass index (BMI), duration of work toward fatigue of nurses in Dr. M Haulussy General Hospital Ambon. Syst. Rev. Pharm. 11, 288–292. doi: 10.31838/srp.2020.4.41

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Saeidi, S., Rentala, G., Rizzuto, T., Hong, T., Johannsen, N., Zhu, Y., et al. (2021). Exploring thermal state in mixed immersive virtual environments. J. Build. Eng. 44, 102918. doi: 10.1016/j.jobe.2021.102918

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Salinas, M. M., Wilken, J. M., and Dingwell, J. B. (2017). How humans use visual optic flow to regulate stepping during walking. Gait Posture. 57, 15–20. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2017.05.002

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Sánchez-Brau, M., Domenech-Amigot, B., Brocal-Fernández, F., Quesada-Rico, J. A., and Seguí-Crespo, M. (2020). Prevalence of computer vision syndrome and its relationship with ergonomic and individual factors in presbyopic VDT workers using progressive addition lenses. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health. 17, 1003. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17031003

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Saracini, C., Basso, D., and Olivetti Belardinelli, M. (2020). “Stereoscopy does not improve metric distance estimations in virtual environments,” in Proceedings of the 2nd International and Interdisciplinary Conference on Image and Imagination, ed E. Cicalò (Cham: Springer International Publishing), 907–922. (Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing). doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-41018-6_74

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Saredakis, D., Szpak, A., Birckhead, B., Keage, H. A. D., Rizzo, A., Loetscher, T., et al. (2020). Factors associated with virtual reality sickness in head-mounted displays: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 14, 96. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2020.00096

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Scarfe, P., and Glennerster, A. (2019). The science behind virtual reality displays. Ann. Rev. Vis. Sci. 5, 529–547. doi: 10.1146/annurev-vision-091718-014942

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Schmitt, C., Schwenk, J. C. B., Schütz, A., Churan, J., Kaminiarz, A., Bremmer, F., et al. (2021). Preattentive processing of visually guided self-motion in humans and monkeys. Prog. Neurobiol. 205, 102117. doi: 10.1016/j.pneurobio.2021.102117

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Schubert, R. S., Hartwig, J., Müller, M., Groh, R., and Pannasch, S. (2016). “Are age differences missing in relative and absolute distance perception of stereoscopically presented virtual objects?” in Proceedings of the 22nd ACM Conference on Virtual Reality Software and Technology (New York, NY: Association for Computing Machinery), 307–308. (VRST '16). doi: 10.1145/2993369.2996334

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Sepich, N. C., Jasper, A., Fieffer, S., Gilbert, S. B., Dorneich, M. C., Kelly, J. W., et al. (2022). The impact of task workload on cybersickness. Front. Virtual Real. 3, 943409. doi: 10.3389/frvir.2022.943409

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Sesboüé, B., and Guincestre, J. Y. (2006). Muscular fatigue. Ann. Réadapt. Méd. Phys. 49, 348–354. doi: 10.1016/j.annrmp.2006.04.020

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Shamsuddin, S. N. W., Lesk, V., and Ugail, H. (2011). Virtual environment design guidelines for elderly people in early detection of dementia. Int. J. Biomed. Biol. Eng. 5, 603–607.

Google Scholar

Shannon, C., Havey, E., and Vasavada, A. (2019). Sit-stand workstations: relations among postural sway, task, proprioception and discomfort. Proc. Hum. Factors Ergon. Soc. Annu. Meet. 63, 972–976. doi: 10.1177/1071181319631318

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Shariat, A., Cardoso, J. R., Cleland, J. A., Danaee, M., Ansari, N. N., Kargarfard, M., et al. (2018). Prevalence rate of neck, shoulder and lower back pain in association with age, body mass index and gender among Malaysian office workers. Work 60, 191–199. doi: 10.3233/WOR-182738

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Sharples, S., Cobb, S., Moody, A., and Wilson, J. R. (2008). Virtual reality induced symptoms and effects (VRISE): comparison of head mounted display (HMD), desktop and projection display systems. Displays 29, 58–69. doi: 10.1016/j.displa.2007.09.005

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Shen, R., Weng, D., Guo, J., Fang, H., and Jiang, H. (2019). “Effects of dynamic disparity on visual fatigue caused by watching 2D videos in HMDs,” in Image and Graphics Technologies and Applications, eds Y. Wang, Q. Huang, and Y. Peng (Singapore: Springer), 310–321. doi: 10.1007/978-981-13-9917-6_30

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Shepard, R. N., and Metzler, J. (1971). Mental rotation of three-dimensional objects. Science 171, 701–703. doi: 10.1126/science.171.3972.701

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Sheppard, A. L., and Wolffsohn, J. S. (2018). Digital eye strain: prevalence, measurement and amelioration. BMJ Open Ophthalmol. 3, e000146. doi: 10.1136/bmjophth-2018-000146

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Shi, R., Liang, H. N., Wu, Y., Yu, D., and Xu, W. (2021). Virtual reality sickness mitigation methods: a comparative study in a racing game. Proc. ACM Comput. Graph. Interact Tech. 4, 8:1–8:16. doi: 10.1145/3451255

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Shibata, T., Kim, J., Hoffman, D. M., and Banks, M. S. (2011). The zone of comfort: predicting visual discomfort with stereo displays. J. Vis. 11, 1–29. doi: 10.1167/11.8.11

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Shields, G. S., Sazma, M. A., McCullough, A. M., and Yonelinas, A. P. (2017). The effects of acute stress on episodic memory: a meta-analysis and integrative review. Psychol. Bull. 143, 636–675. doi: 10.1037/bul0000100

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Shields, G. S., Sazma, M. A., and Yonelinas, A. P. (2016). The effects of acute stress on core executive functions: a meta-analysis and comparison with cortisol. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 68, 651–668. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2016.06.038

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Shortz, A. E., and Mehta, R. K. (2017). Cognitive challenges, aging, and neuromuscular fatigue. Physiol. Behav. 170, 19–26. doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2016.11.034

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Shuda, Q., Bougoulias, M. E., and Kass, R. (2020). Effect of nature exposure on perceived and physiologic stress: a systematic review. Complement Ther. Med. 53, 102514. doi: 10.1016/j.ctim.2020.102514

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Siddig, A., Sun, P. W., Parker, M. A., and Hines, A. (2019). Perception Deception: Audio-Visual Mismatch in Virtual Reality Using The McGurk Effect. Pre-Print. Available online at: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Perception-Deception%3A-Audio-Visual-Mismatch-in-The-Siddig-Sun/221c47de6ae03ebba78fe311f86410394c5f409d (accessed July 8, 2021).

Google Scholar

Sidenmark, L., Clarke, C., Zhang, X., Phu, J., and Gellersen, H. (2020). “Outline pursuits: gaze-assisted selection of occluded objects in virtual reality,” in Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (New York, NY: Association for Computing Machinery), 1–13. doi: 10.1145/3313831.3376438

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Silva, N., Blascheck, T., Jianu, R., Rodrigues, N., Weiskopf, D., Raubal, M., et al. (2019). “Eye tracking support for visual analytics systems: foundations, current applications, and research challenges,” in Proceedings of the 11th ACM Symposium on Eye Tracking Research and Applications (New York, NY: Association for Computing Machinery), 1–10. (ETRA '19). doi: 10.1145/3314111.3319919

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Singh, S., Downie, L. E., and Anderson, A. J. (2021). Do blue-blocking lenses reduce eye strain from extended screen time? A double-masked randomized controlled trial. Am. J. Ophthalmol. 226, 243–251. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2021.02.010

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Smith, S. L., and Mosier, J. N. (1986). Guidelines for Designing User Interface Software. Bedford, MA: MITRE Corporation. doi: 10.21236/ADA177198

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Smith, S. P., and Du'Mont, S. (2009). “Measuring the effect of gaming experience on virtual environment navigation tasks,” in 2009 IEEE Symposium on 3D User Interfaces (Lafayette, LA: IEEE), 3–10. doi: 10.1109/3DUI.2009.4811198

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

So, R. H. Y., Lo, W. T., and Ho, A. T. K. (2001). Effects of navigation speed on motion sickness caused by an immersive virtual environment. Hum. Factors 43, 452–461. doi: 10.1518/001872001775898223

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Sokhadze, E. M. (2007). Effects of music on the recovery of autonomic and electrocortical activity after stress induced by aversive visual stimuli. Appl. Psychophysiol. Biofeedback 32, 31–50. doi: 10.1007/s10484-007-9033-y

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Somrak, A., Humar, I., Hossain, M. S., Alhamid, M. F., Hossain, M. A., Guna, J., et al. (2019). Estimating VR sickness and user experience using different HMD technologies: an evaluation study. Future Gener. Comput. Syst. 94, 302–316. doi: 10.1016/j.future.2018.11.041

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Song, J., Chung, T., Kang, J., and Nam, K. (2011). “The changes in performance during stress-inducing cognitive task: focusing on processing difficulty,” in Future Information Technology, eds J. J. Park, L. T. Yang, and C. Lee (Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer), 345–347. doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-22309-9_44

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Song, Y., Liu, Y., and Yan, Y. (2019). “The effects of center of mass on comfort of soft belts virtual reality devices,” in Advances in Ergonomics in Design, eds F. Rebelo, and M. M. Soares (Cham: Springer International Publishing), 312–321. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-94706-8_35

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Souchet, A. D. (2020). Visual Fatigue Impacts on Learning via Serious Game in Virtual Reality [PhD Thesis]. Saint-Denis: Paris 8 University.

Google Scholar

Souchet, A. D., Lourdeaux, D., Pagani, A., and Rebenitsch, L. (2022). A narrative review of immersive virtual reality's ergonomics and risks at the workplace: cybersickness, visual fatigue, muscular fatigue, acute stress, and mental overload. Virtual Real. 27, 19–50. doi: 10.1007/s10055-022-00672-0

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Souchet, A. D., Philippe, S., Lévêque, A., Ober, F., and Leroy, L. (2021). Short- and long-term learning of job interview with a serious game in virtual reality: influence of eyestrain, stereoscopy, and apparatus. Virtual Real. 26, 583–600. doi: 10.1007/s10055-021-00548-9

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Souchet, A. D., Philippe, S., Ober, F., Lévêque, A., and Leroy, L. (2019). “Investigating cyclical stereoscopy effects over visual discomfort and fatigue in virtual reality while learning,” in 2019 IEEE International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality (ISMAR) (Beijing: IEEE), 328–338. doi: 10.1109/ISMAR.2019.00031

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Souchet, A. D., Philippe, S., Zobel, D., Ober, F., Lévěque, A., Leroy, L., et al. (2018). “Eyestrain impacts on learning job interview with a serious game in virtual reality: a randomized double-blinded study,” in Proceedings of the 24th ACM Symposium on Virtual Reality Software and Technology (Tokyo), 1–12. doi: 10.1145/3281505.3281509

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Speed, G., Harris, K., and Keegel, T. (2018). The effect of cushioning materials on musculoskeletal discomfort and fatigue during prolonged standing at work: a systematic review. Appl. Ergon. 70, 300–314. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2018.02.021

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Speicher, M., Hell, P., Daiber, F., Simeone, A., and Krüger, A. (2018). “A virtual reality shopping experience using the apartment metaphor,” in Proceedings of the 2018 International Conference on Advanced Visual Interfaces (New York, NY: Association for Computing Machinery), 1–9. (AVI '18). doi: 10.1145/3206505.3206518

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Speranza, F., Tam, W. J., Renaud, R., and Hur, N. (2006). “Effect of disparity and motion on visual comfort of stereoscopic images,” in Proceedings Volume 6055, Stereoscopic Displays and Virtual Reality Systems XIII (San Jose, CA). doi: 10.1117/12.640865

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Sprang, G., Ford, J., Kerig, P., and Bride, B. (2019). Defining secondary traumatic stress and developing targeted assessments and interventions: lessons learned from research and leading experts. Traumatology 25, 72–81. doi: 10.1037/trm0000180

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Stanney, K., Fidopiastis, C., and Foster, L. (2020a). Virtual reality is sexist: but it does not have to be. Front. AI. 7, 4. doi: 10.3389/frobt.2020.00004

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Stanney, K., Lawson, B. D., Rokers, B., Dennison, M., Fidopiastis, C., Stoffregen, T., et al. (2020b). Identifying causes of and solutions for cybersickness in immersive technology: reformulation of a research and development agenda. Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact. 36, 1783–1803. doi: 10.1080/10447318.2020.1828535

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Stanney, K. M., Graeber, D. A., and Kennedy, R. S. (2021a). Virtual Environment Usage protocols,” inHandbook of Human Factors and Ergonomics, 5th ed., eds W. Karwowski, A. Szopa, and M. M. Soares (London: CRC Press), 495–511. doi: 10.1201/9780429169243-29-34

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Stanney, K. M., Hale, K. S., Nahmens, I., and Kennedy, R. S. (2003a). What to expect from immersive virtual environment exposure: influences of gender, body mass index, and past experience. Hum. Factors 45, 504–520. doi: 10.1518/hfes.45.3.504.27254

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Stanney, K. M., Mollaghasemi, M., Reeves, L., Breaux, R., and Graeber, D. A. (2003b). Usability engineering of virtual environments (VEs): identifying multiple criteria that drive effective VE system design. Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud. 58, 447–481. doi: 10.1016/S1071-5819(03)00015-6

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Stanney, K. M., Mourant, R. R., and Kennedy, R. S. (1998). Human factors issues in virtual environments: a review of the literature. Presence 7, 327–351. doi: 10.1162/105474698565767

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Stanney, K. M., Nye, H., Haddad, S., Hale, K. S., Padron, C. K., Cohn, J. V., et al. (2021b). “Extended reality (XR) environments,” in Handbook of Human Factors and Ergonomics, 5th ed., eds W. Karwowski, A. Szopa, and M. M. Soares (Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press), 782–815. doi: 10.1002/9781119636113.ch30

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Staresina, B. P., and Wimber, M. (2019). A neural chronometry of memory recall. Trends Cogn Sci. 23, 1071–1085. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2019.09.011

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Stauffert, J. P., Korwisi, K., Niebling, F., and Latoschik, M. E. (2021). “Ka-Boom!!! visually exploring latency measurements for XR,” in Extended Abstracts of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Yokohama), 1–9. doi: 10.1145/3411763.3450379

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Stauffert, J. P., Niebling, F., and Latoschik, M. E. (2020). Latency and cybersickness: impact, causes, and measures. A review. Front. Virtual Real. 1, 582204. doi: 10.3389/frvir.2020.582204

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Steinman, B., Scheiman, M., and Wick, B. (2014). Clinical Management of Binocular Vision: Heterophoric, Accommodative, and Eye Movement Disorders. Baltimore, MD: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.

Google Scholar

Stratton, S. J. (2016). Comprehensive reviews. Prehosp. Disaster Med. 31, 347–348. doi: 10.1017/S1049023X16000649

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Su, Z. B., Li, D. R., Li, B., and Ren, H. (2018). “Objective visual comfort assessment model of stereoscopic images based on BP neural network,” in 2018 Tenth International Conference on Advanced Computational Intelligence (ICACI) (Xiamen: IEEE), 426–431. doi: 10.1109/ICACI.2018.8377497

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Sugita, N., Sasaki, K., Yoshizawa, M., Ichiji, K., Abe, M., Homma, N., et al. (2019). Effect of viewing a three-dimensional movie with vertical parallax. Displays 58, 20–26. doi: 10.1016/j.displa.2018.10.007

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Sulutvedt, U., Zavagno, D., Lubell, J., Leknes, S., de Rodez Benavent, S. A., Laeng, B., et al. (2021). Brightness perception changes related to pupil size. Vision Res. 178, 41–47. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2020.09.004

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Sun, Y., Kar, G., Stevenson Won, A., and Hedge, A. (2019). Postural risks and user experience of 3d interface designs for virtual reality-based learning environments. Proc. Hum. Factors Ergon. Soc. Ann. Meet. 63, 2313–2317. doi: 10.1177/1071181319631023

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Sun, Z., Cheng, Z., Liang, H., Jiang, H., and Wang, J. (2020). “Research on visual fatigue related to parallax,” in Advances in 3D Image and Graphics Representation, Analysis, Computing and Information Technology, eds R. Kountchev, S. Patnaik, J. Shi, and M. N. Favorskaya (Singapore: Springer Singapore), 513–521. (Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies; vol. 180). doi: 10.1007/978-981-15-3867-4_60

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Sweeney, L. E., Seidel, D., Day, M., Gray, L. S., and TYPE1PD (2014). Adaptive virtual environments for neuropsychological assessment in serious games. Vis. Res. 105, 121–129. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2014.10.007

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Szalma, J. L., and Hancock, P. A. (2011). Noise effects on human performance: a meta-analytic synthesis. Psychol. Bull. 137, 682–707. doi: 10.1037/a0023987

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Szeto, G. P. Y., and Sham, K. S. W. (2008). The effects of angled positions of computer display screen on muscle activities of the neck–shoulder stabilizers. Int. J. Ind. Ergon. 38, 9–17. doi: 10.1016/j.ergon.2007.07.014

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Szeto, G. P. Y., Straker, L. M., and O'Sullivan, P. B. (2005). A. comparison of symptomatic and asymptomatic office workers performing monotonous keyboard work-−2: neck and shoulder kinematics. Man. Ther. 10, 281–291. doi: 10.1016/j.math.2005.01.005

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Szopa, A., and Soares, M. M. (2021). Handbook of Standards and Guidelines in Human Factors and Ergonomics, 2nd ed., ed W. Karwowski. London: CRC Press. Available online at: https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/9781466594531 (accessed June 22, 2021).

Google Scholar

Szpak, A., Michalski, S. C., and Loetscher, T. (2020). Exergaming with beat saber: an investigation of virtual reality aftereffects. J. Med. Internet Res. 22, e19840. doi: 10.2196/19840

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Tan, M. K. S., Goode, S., and Richardson, A. (2020). Understanding negotiated anti-malware interruption effects on user decision quality in endpoint security. Behav. Inf. Technol. 40, 903–932. doi: 10.1080/0144929X.2020.1734087

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Tarafdar, M., Cooper, C. L., and Stich, J. (2019). The technostress trifecta - techno eustress, techno distress and design: theoretical directions and an agenda for research. Info Systems J. 29, 6–42. doi: 10.1111/isj.12169

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Tarafdar, M., Pirkkalainen, H., Salo, M., and Makkonen, M. (2020). Taking on the “Dark Side”—-coping with technostress. IT Prof. 22, 82–89. doi: 10.1109/MITP.2020.2977343

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Teixeira, J., and Palmisano, S. (2021). Effects of dynamic field-of-view restriction on cybersickness and presence in HMD-based virtual reality. Virtual Real. 25, 433–445. doi: 10.1007/s10055-020-00466-2

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Tellefsen Nøland, S., Badian, R. A., Utheim, T. P., Utheim, Ø. A., Stojanovic, A., Tashbayev, B., et al. (2021). Sex and age differences in symptoms and signs of dry eye disease in a Norwegian cohort of patients. Ocul. Surf. 19, 68–73. doi: 10.1016/j.jtos.2020.11.009

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Terenzi, L., and Zaal, P. (2020). “Rotational and translational velocity and acceleration thresholds for the onset of cybersickness in virtual reality,” in AIAA Scitech 2020 Forum (Orlando, FL: American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics). doi: 10.2514/6.2020-0171

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Theorell, T., Hammarström, A., Aronsson, G., Träskman Bendz, L., Grape, T., Hogstedt, C., et al. (2015). A systematic review including meta-analysis of work environment and depressive symptoms. BMC Public Health 15, 738. doi: 10.1186/s12889-015-1954-4

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Theresa Pöhlmann, K. M., O'Hare, L., Föcker, J., Parke, A., and Dickinson, P. (2021). “Is virtual reality sickness elicited by illusory motion affected by gender and prior video gaming experience?” in 2021 IEEE Conference on Virtual Reality and 3D User Interfaces Abstracts and Workshops (VRW) (Lisbon: IEEE), 426–427. doi: 10.1109/VRW52623.2021.00095

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Thoma, M. V., Marca, R. L., Brönnimann, R., Finkel, L., Ehlert, U., Nater, U. M., et al. (2013). The effect of music on the human stress response. PLOS ONE 8, e70156. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0070156

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Tian, F., Zhang, Y., and Li, Y. (2021). From 2D to VR film: a research on the load of different cutting rates based on EEG data processing. Information 12, 130. doi: 10.3390/info12030130

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Tian, N., Clément, R., Lopes, P., and Boulic, R. (2020). “On the effect of the vertical axis alignment on cybersickness and game experience in a supine posture,” in 2020 IEEE Conference on Games (CoG) (Osaka: IEEE), 359–366. doi: 10.1109/CoG47356.2020.9231830

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Tobaruela, G., Schuster, W., Majumdar, A., Ochieng, W. Y., Martinez, L., Hendrickx, P., et al. (2014). method to estimate air traffic controller mental workload based on traffic clearances. J. Air Transp. Manag. 39, 59–71. doi: 10.1016/j.jairtraman.2014.04.002

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Toh, S. H., Coenen, P., Howie, E. K., and Straker, L. M. (2017). The associations of mobile touch screen device use with musculoskeletal symptoms and exposures: a systematic review. PLoS ONE 12, e0181220. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0181220

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Toscani, M., Gil, R., Guarnera, D., Guarnera, G., Kalouaz, A., Gegenfurtner, K. R., et al. (2019). “Assessment of OLED head mounted display for vision research with virtual reality,” in 2019 15th International Conference on Signal-Image Technology Internet-Based Systems (SITIS) (Sorrento: IEEE), 738–745. doi: 10.1109/SITIS.2019.00120

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Toth, A. J., and Campbell, M. J. (2019). Investigating sex differences, cognitive effort, strategy, and performance on a computerised version of the mental rotations test via eye tracking. Sci. Rep. 9, 19430. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-56041-6

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Tsai, S. E., Tsai, W. L., Pan, T. Y., Kuo, C. M., and Hu, M. C. (2021). “Does virtual odor representation influence the perception of olfactory intensity and directionality in VR?” in 2021 IEEE Virtual Reality and 3D User Interfaces (VR) (Lisboa: IEEE), 279–285. doi: 10.1109/VR50410.2021.00050

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Turnbull, P. R. K., Wong, J., Feng, J., Wang, M. T. M., and Craig, J. P. (2019). Effect of virtual reality headset wear on the tear film: a randomised crossover study. Cont. Lens Anterior Eye 42, 640–645. doi: 10.1016/j.clae.2019.08.003

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Tuthill, J. C., and Azim, E. (2018). Proprioception. Curr. Biol. 28, R194–R203. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2018.01.064

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Tychsen, L., and Foeller, P. (2020). Effects of immersive virtual reality headset viewing on young children: visuomotor function, postural stability, and motion sickness. Am. J. Ophthalmol. 209, 151–159. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2019.07.020

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Ukai, K., and Howarth, P. A. (2008). Visual fatigue caused by viewing stereoscopic motion images: background, theories, and observations. Displays 29, 106–116. doi: 10.1016/j.displa.2007.09.004

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Vagge, A., Desideri, L. F., Noce, C. D., Mola, I. D., Sindaco, D., Traverso, C. E., et al. (2021). Blue light filtering ophthalmic lenses: a systematic review. Semin. Ophthalmol. 36, 541–548. doi: 10.1080/08820538.2021.1900283

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Vallejo, L., Zapater-Fajarí, M., Montoliu, T., Puig-Perez, S., Nacher, J., Hidalgo, V., et al. (2021). No effects of acute psychosocial stress on working memory in older people with type 2 diabetes. Front. Psychol. 11, 596584. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.596584

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Van Acker, B. B., Parmentier, D. D., Vlerick, P., and Saldien, J. (2018). Understanding mental workload: from a clarifying concept analysis toward an implementable framework. Cogn. Tech. Work 20, 351–365. doi: 10.1007/s10111-018-0481-3

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Van den Berg, M. M. H. E., Maas, J., Muller, R., Braun, A., Kaandorp, W., Van Lien, R., et al. (2015). Autonomic nervous system responses to viewing green and built settings: differentiating between sympathetic and parasympathetic activity. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 12, 15860–15874. doi: 10.3390/ijerph121215026

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

van der Veer, A., Alsmith, A., Longo, M., Wong, H. Y., Diers, D., Bues, M., et al. (2019). “The influence of the viewpoint in a self-avatar on body part and self-localization,” in ACM Symposium on Applied Perception 2019 (New York, NY: Association for Computing Machinery), 1–11. (SAP '19). doi: 10.1145/3343036.3343124

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Varmaghani, S., Abbasi, Z., Weech, S., and Rasti, J. (2021). Spatial and attentional aftereffects of virtual reality and relations to cybersickness. Virtual Real. 26, 659–668. doi: 10.1007/s10055-021-00535-0

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Vasilev, M. R., Kirkby, J. A., and Angele, B. (2018). Auditory distraction during reading: a bayesian meta-analysis of a continuing controversy. Perspect. Psychol. Sci. 13, 567–597. doi: 10.1177/1745691617747398

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Vasser, M., and Aru, J. (2020). Guidelines for immersive virtual reality in psychological research. Curr. Opin. Psychol. 36, 71–76. doi: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2020.04.010

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Vasylevska, K., Yoo, H., Akhavan, T., and Kaufmann, H. (2019). “Towards eye-friendly vr: how bright should it be?” in 2019 IEEE Conference on Virtual Reality and 3D User Interfaces (VR) (Osaka: IEEE), 566–574. doi: 10.1109/VR.2019.8797752

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Vi, S., da Silva, T. S., and Maurer, F. (2019). “User experience guidelines for designing HMD extended reality applications,” in Human-Computer Interaction – INTERACT 2019, eds D. Lamas, F. Loizides, L. Nacke, H. Petrie, M. Winckler, and P. Zaphiris (Cham: Springer International Publishing), 319–341. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-29390-1_18

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Viana, F., and Voets, T. (2020). “Heat pain and cold pain,” inThe Oxford Handbook of the Neurobiology of Pain, ed J. N. Wood (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 178–199.

Google Scholar

Wagner, J., Stuerzlinger, W., and Nedel, L. (2021). Comparing and combining virtual hand and virtual ray pointer interactions for data manipulation in immersive analytics. IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph. 27, 2513–2523. doi: 10.1109/TVCG.2021.3067759

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Wahl, S., Engelhardt, M., Schaupp, P., Lappe, C., and Ivanov, I. V. (2019). The inner clock—blue light sets the human rhythm. J. Biophotonics 12, e201900102. doi: 10.1002/jbio.201900102

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Wall, R., Garcia, G., Läubli, T., Seibt, R., Rieger, M. A., Martin, B., et al. (2020). Physiological changes during prolonged standing and walking considering age, gender and standing work experience. Ergonomics 63, 579–592. doi: 10.1080/00140139.2020.1725145

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Wan, J. j., Qin, Z., Wang, P. y., Sun, Y., and Liu, X. (2017). Muscle fatigue: general understanding and treatment. Exp. Mol. Med. 49, e384. doi: 10.1038/emm.2017.194

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Wang, A., Kuo, H., and Huang, S. (2010). “Effects of polarity and ambient illuminance on the searching performance and visual fatigue for various aged users,” in The 40th International Conference on Computers Indutrial Engineering (Awaji: IEEE), 1–3. doi: 10.1109/ICCIE.2010.5668318

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Wang, J., and Lewis, R. F. (2016). Contribution of intravestibular sensory conflict to motion sickness and dizziness in migraine disorders. J. Neurophysiol. 116, 1586–1591. doi: 10.1152/jn.00345.2016

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Wang, K., Ho, C. H., and Zong, Y. (2020). Analysis of brightness and color temperature of liquid crystal display on visual comfort based on eye health monitoring of humans. J. Med. Imaging Health Inf. 10, 1359–1364. doi: 10.1166/jmihi.2020.3058

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Wang, L., He, X., and Chen, Y. (2016). Quantitative relationship model between workload and time pressure under different flight operation tasks. Int. J. Ind. Ergon. 54, 93–102. doi: 10.1016/j.ergon.2016.05.008

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Wang, X., Shi, Y., Zhang, B., and Chiang, Y. (2019). The influence of forest resting environments on stress using virtual reality. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 16, 3263. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16183263

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Wang, X. M., Thaler, A., Eftekharifar, S., Bebko, A. O., and Troje, N. F. (2020). “Perceptual distortions between windows and screens: stereopsis predicts motion parallax,” in 2020 IEEE Conference on Virtual Reality and 3D User Interfaces Abstracts and Workshops (VRW) (Atlanta, GA: IEEE), 684–685. doi: 10.1109/VRW50115.2020.00193

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Wang, Y., Chardonnet, J. R., Merienne, F., and Ovtcharova, J. (2021). “Using fuzzy logic to involve individual differences for predicting cybersickness during vr navigation,” in 2021 IEEE Virtual Reality and 3D User Interfaces (VR) (Lisboa: IEEE), 373–381. doi: 10.1109/VR50410.2021.00060

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Wang, Y., Zhai, G., Chen, S., Min, X., Gao, Z., Song, X., et al. (2019). Assessment of eye fatigue caused by head-mounted displays using eye-tracking. BioMed. Eng. OnLine 18, 111. doi: 10.1186/s12938-019-0731-5

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Wang, Z., Chen, K., and He, R. (2019). “Study on thermal comfort of virtual reality headsets,” in Advances in Human Factors in Wearable Technologies and Game Design, ed T. Z. Ahram (Cham: Springer International Publishing), 180–186. (Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing). doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-94619-1_17

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Waongenngarm, P., van der Beek, A. J., Akkarakittichoke, N., and Janwantanakul, P. (2020). Perceived musculoskeletal discomfort and its association with postural shifts during 4-h prolonged sitting in office workers. Appl. Ergon. 89, 103225. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2020.103225

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Watson, B. A., and Hodges, L. F. (1995). “Using texture maps to correct for optical distortion in head-mounted displays,” in Proceedings Virtual Reality Annual International Symposium '95. (Research Triangle Park, NC), 172–178. doi: 10.1109/VRAIS.1995.512493

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Weech, S., Wall, T., and Barnett-Cowan, M. (2020). Reduction of cybersickness during and immediately following noisy galvanic vestibular stimulation. Exp. Brain Res. 238, 427–437. doi: 10.1007/s00221-019-05718-5

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Weinert, C., Pflügner, K., and Maier, C. (2020). “Do users respond to challenging and hindering techno-stressors differently? A laboratory experiment,” in Information Systems and Neuroscience, eds F. D. Davis, R. Riedl, J. vom Brocke, P. M. Léger, A. B. Randolph, and T. Fischer (Cham: Springer International Publishing), 79–89. (Lecture Notes in Information Systems and Organisation). doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-60073-0_10

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Weng, M., Huber, S., Vilgan, E., Grundgeiger, T., and Sanderson, P. M. (2017). Interruptions, visual cues, and the microstructure of interaction: four laboratory studies. Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud. 103, 77–94. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhcs.2017.02.002

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Wentzel, J., d'Eon, G., and Vogel, D. (2020). “Improving virtual reality ergonomics through reach-bounded non-linear input amplification,” in Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Honolulu, HI), 1–12. doi: 10.1145/3313831.3376687

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Wickens, C. D. (2017). “Mental workload: assessment, prediction and consequences,” in Human Mental Workload: Models and Applications, eds L. Longo, and M. C. Leva (Cham: Springer International Publishing), 18–29. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-61061-0_2

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Widyanti, A., and Hafizhah, H. N. (2021).The influence of personality, sound, and content difficulty on virtual reality sickness. Virtual Real. 26, 631–637. doi: 10.1007/s10055-021-00525-2

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Willingham, D. T., Hughes, E. M., and Dobolyi, D. G. (2015). The scientific status of learning styles theories. Teach. Psychol. 42, 266–271. doi: 10.1177/0098628315589505

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Wismer, A., Reinerman-Jones, L., Teo, G., Willis, S., McCracken, K., Hackett, M. A., et al. (2018). “Workload comparison during anatomical training with a physical or virtual model,” in Augmented Cognition: Users and Contexts, eds D. D. Schmorrow, and C. M. Fidopiastis (Cham: Springer International Publishing), 240–252. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-91467-1_20

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Wong, K., Chan, A. H. S., and Ngan, S. C. (2019). The effect of long working hours and overtime on occupational health: a meta-analysis of evidence from 1998 to 2018. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 16, 2102. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16122102

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Wu, H., Deng, Y., Pan, J., Han, T., Hu, Y., Huang, K., et al. (2021). User capabilities in eyes-free spatial target acquisition in immersive virtual reality environments. Appl. Ergon. 94, 103400. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2021.103400

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Xia, Z., Wang, F., Cheng, C., and Gu, M. (2019). 93: invited paper: geometric distortions in three-dimensional endoscopic visualization. SID Symp. Dig. Tech. Pap. 50, 91–94. doi: 10.1002/sdtp.13398

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Xie, X., Song, F., Liu, Y., Wang, S., and Yu, D. (2021). Study on the effects of display color mode and luminance contrast on visual fatigue. IEEE Access 9, 35915–35923. doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3061770

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Yan, S., Tran, C. C., Chen, Y., Tan, K., and Habiyaremye, J. L. (2017). Effect of user interface layout on the operators' mental workload in emergency operating procedures in nuclear power plants. Nucl. Eng. Des. 322, 266–276. doi: 10.1016/j.nucengdes.2017.07.012

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Yan, Y., Chen, K., Xie, Y., Song, Y., and Liu, Y. (2019). “The effects of weight on comfort of virtual reality devices,” in Advances in Ergonomics in Design, eds F. Rebelo, and M. M. Soares (Cham: Springer International Publishing), 239–248. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-94706-8_27

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Yildirim, C. (2020). Don't make me sick: investigating the incidence of cybersickness in commercial virtual reality headsets. Virtual Real. 24, 231–239. doi: 10.1007/s10055-019-00401-0

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Yin, J., Yuan, J., Arfaei, N., Catalano, P. J., Allen, J. G., Spengler, J. D., et al. (2020). Effects of biophilic indoor environment on stress and anxiety recovery: a between-subjects experiment in virtual reality. Environ. Int. 136, 105427. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2019.105427

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Yin, J., Zhu, S., MacNaughton, P., Allen, J. G., and Spengler, J. D. (2018). Physiological and cognitive performance of exposure to biophilic indoor environment. Build. Environ. 132, 255–262. doi: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2018.01.006

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Yoon, H. J., Kim, J., Park, S. W., and Heo, H. (2020). Influence of virtual reality on visual parameters: immersive versus non-immersive mode. BMC Ophthalmol. 20, 200. doi: 10.1186/s12886-020-01471-4

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Yoon, W., Choi, S., Han, H., and Shin, G. (2021). Neck muscular load when using a smartphone while sitting, standing, and walking. Hum. Factors 63, 868–879. doi: 10.1177/0018720820904237

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Young, M. S., Brookhuis, K. A., Wickens, C. D., and Hancock, P. A. (2015). State of science: mental workload in ergonomics. Ergonomics 58, 1–17. doi: 10.1080/00140139.2014.956151

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Yu, C. P., Lee, H. Y., and Luo, X. Y. (2018). The effect of virtual reality forest and urban environments on physiological and psychological responses. Urban For. Urban Green. 35, 106–114. doi: 10.1016/j.ufug.2018.08.013

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Yu, D., Lu, X., Shi, R., Liang, H. N., Dingler, T., Velloso, E., et al. (2021). “Gaze-supported 3D object manipulation in virtual reality,” in Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (New York, NY: Association for Computing Machinery), 1–13. doi: 10.1145/3411764.3445343

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Yu, X., Weng, D., Guo, J., Jiang, H., and Bao, Y. (2018). “Effect of using HMDs for one hour on preteens visual fatigue,” in 2018 IEEE International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality Adjunct (ISMAR-Adjunct) (Munich: IEEE), 93–96. doi: 10.1109/ISMAR-Adjunct.2018.00042

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Yuan, J., Mansouri, B., Pettey, J. H., Ahmed, S. F., and Khaderi, S. K. (2018). The visual effects associated with head-mounted displays. Int. J. Ophthalmol. Clin. Res. 5, 85. doi: 10.23937/2378-346X/1410085

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Yue, K., Wang, D., Hu, H., and Fang, S. (2018). The correlation between visual fatigue and duration of viewing as assessed by brain monitoring. J. Soc. Inf. Disp. 26, 427–437. doi: 10.1002/jsid.667

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Zaroff, C. M., Knutelska, M., and Frumkes, T. E. (2003). Variation in stereoacuity: normative description, fixation disparity, and the roles of aging and gender. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 44, 891–900. doi: 10.1167/iovs.02-0361

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Zarzissi, S., Bouzid, M. A., Zghal, F., Rebai, H., and Hureau, T. J. (2020). Aging reduces the maximal level of peripheral fatigue tolerable and impairs exercise capacity. Am. J. Physiol. Regul. Integr. Comp. Physiol. 319, R617–R625. doi: 10.1152/ajpregu.00151.2020

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Zeroth, J. A., Dahlquist, L. M., and Foxen-Craft, E. C. (2019). The effects of auditory background noise and virtual reality technology on video game distraction analgesia. Scand. J. Pain 19, 207–217. doi: 10.1515/sjpain-2018-0123

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Zhang, S., Zhang, Y., Sun, Y., Thakor, N., and Bezerianos, A. (2017). “Graph theoretical analysis of EEG functional network during multi-workload flight simulation experiment in virtual reality environment,” in 2017 39th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC) (Jeju: IEEE), 3957–3960. doi: 10.1109/EMBC.2017.8037722

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Zhang, X., Lawrence, J. J., Nalbandian, A. T., and Owens, D. A. (2010). Differential effects of contrast and field size on the perception of object-motion and self-motion: new evidence for ambient and focal modes of vision. J. Vis. 10, 36. doi: 10.1167/10.15.36

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Zhang, Y., Ladeveze, N., Nguyen, H., Fleury, C., and Bourdot, P. (2020a). “Virtual navigation considering user workspace: automatic and manual positioning before teleportation,” in 26th ACM Symposium on Virtual Reality Software and Technology. Virtual Event Canada, 1–11. doi: 10.1145/3385956.3418949

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Zhang, Y., Tu, Y., Wang, L., and Zhang, W. (2020b). Assessment of visual fatigue under LED tunable white light with different blue components. J. Soc. Inf. Disp. 28, 24–35. doi: 10.1002/jsid.866

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Zhang, Y., Yang, Y., Feng, S., Qi, J., Li, W., Yu, J., et al. (2020c). “The evaluation on visual fatigue and comfort between the VR HMD and the iPad,” in Advances in Physical, Social and Occupational Ergonomics, eds W. Karwowski, R. S. Goonetilleke, S. Xiong, R. H. M. Goossens, and A. Murata (Cham: Springer International Publishing), 213–219. (Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing; vol. 1215). doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-51549-2_28

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Zhao, X., Xia, Q., and Huang, W. (2020). Impact of technostress on productivity from the theoretical perspective of appraisal and coping processes. Inf. Manag. 57, 103265. doi: 10.1016/j.im.2020.103265

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Zhou, X., Jin, Y., Jia, L., and Xue, C. (2021). Study on hand–eye cordination area with bare-hand click interaction in virtual reality. Appl. Sci. 11, 6146. doi: 10.3390/app11136146

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Zhou, Y., Shi, H., Chen, Q. W., Ru, T., and Zhou, G. (2021). Investigation of the optimum display luminance of an LCD screen under different ambient illuminances in the evening. Appl. Sci. 11, 4108. doi: 10.3390/app11094108

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Zielasko, D., and Riecke, B. E. (2020). “Sitting vs. standing in vr: towards a systematic classification of challenges and (dis)advantages,” in 2020 IEEE Conference on Virtual Reality and 3D User Interfaces Abstracts and Workshops (VRW) (Atlanta, GA: IEEE), 297–298. doi: 10.1109/VRW50115.2020.00067

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Zielasko, D., Weyers, B., and Kuhlen, T. W. A. (2019). “Non-stationary office desk substitution for desk-based and HMD-projected virtual reality,” in 2019 IEEE Conference on Virtual Reality and 3D User Interfaces (VR) (Osaka: IEEE), 1884–1889. doi: 10.1109/VR.2019.8797837

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Zimmer, P., Buttlar, B., Halbeisen, G., Walther, E., and Domes, G. (2019). Virtually stressed? A refined virtual reality adaptation of the Trier Social Stress Test (TSST) induces robust endocrine responses. Psychoneuroendocrinology 101, 186–192. doi: 10.1016/j.psyneuen.2018.11.010

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Zirek, E., Mustafaoglu, R., Yasaci, Z., and Griffiths, M. D. (2020). A. systematic review of musculoskeletal complaints, symptoms, and pathologies related to mobile phone usage. Musculoskelet. Sci. Pract. 49, 102196. doi: 10.1016/j.msksp.2020.102196

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: virtual reality, ergonomics, cybersickness, visual fatigue, muscle fatigue, acute stress, mental overload, work

Citation: Souchet AD, Lourdeaux D, Burkhardt J-M and Hancock PA (2023) Design guidelines for limiting and eliminating virtual reality-induced symptoms and effects at work: a comprehensive, factor-oriented review. Front. Psychol. 14:1161932. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1161932

Received: 08 February 2023; Accepted: 16 May 2023;
Published: 09 June 2023.

Edited by:

Osvaldo Gervasi, University of Perugia, Italy

Reviewed by:

Kazunori Miyata, Japan Advanced Institute of Science and Technology, Japan
Hai-Ning Liang, Xi'an Jiaotong-Liverpool University, China
Abele Michela, Radboud University, Netherlands

Copyright © 2023 Souchet, Lourdeaux, Burkhardt and Hancock. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Alexis D. Souchet, contact@alexissouchet.com

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.