In the published article, there was an error in Table 4 as published. The incorrect version of Table 4 was published. The corrected Table 4 and its caption appear below.
Table 4
| Model | NNFI | AGFA | GFI | ECVI | CAIC | RMSEA | CFI | S-B χ2(df) | χ2/df | ΔS-B χ2(Δdf) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| M0 | 0.72 | 0.91 | 0.93 | 1.63 | 1,538.64 | 0.106 (0.10–0.11) | 0.78 | 1,148.81 (120) | 9.57 | |
| M1 | 0.79 | 0.93 | 0.94 | 1.42 | 1,293.36 | 0.092 (0.087–0.097) | 0.81 | 1,018.18 (135) | 7.54 | 130.63 (15)** |
| M2 | 0.80 | 0.93 | 0.94 | 1.35 | 1,249.72 | 0.090 (0.084–0.095) | 0.83 | 966.90 (134) | 7.21 | 181.91 (14)** |
| M3 | 0.39 | 0.82 | 0.86 | 3.98 | 3,256.63 | 0.16 (0.15–0.16) | 0.40 | 2,684.58 (135) | 19.88 | 1,535.77 (15)** |
| M4 | 0.85 | 0.95 | 0.96 | 1.00 | 1,056.59 | 0.077 (0.071–0.083) | 0.89 | 666.76 (120) | 5.55 | 482.05** |
| M5 | 0.52 | 0.83 | 0.87 | 0.87 | 879.86 | 0.067 (0.062–0.073) | 0.58 | 597.04 (129) | 4.62 | 551.77 (9)** |
| M6 | 0.23 | 0.76 | 0.81 | 1.24 | 1,150.13 | 0.085 (0.079–0.090) | 0.32 | 882.60 (136) | 6.48 | 266.21 (16)** |
| M7 | 0.90 | 0.97 | 0.98 | 0.559 | 654.51 | 0.066 (0.059–0.073) | 0.92 | 348.76 (80) | 4.35 | 800.05 (40)** |
Goodness-of-fit indices for confirmatory factor analysis of the 18-item Swedish version of Ryff's psychological wellbeing scales.
M0, model with random item-factor associations; M1, general one-factor for 18 items; M2, two-factor orthogonal model; M3, six-factor orthogonal model; M4, six-factor oblique model; M5, six-factor first-order and second order model; M6, a six-factor first-order model and four-factor second-order that loaded by a four-factor model based on the four most highly correlated dimensions: environmental mastery, personal growth, purpose in life and self-acceptance; M7, five-factor first-order oblique model after removing the purpose in life subscale. ** < 0.001.
The authors apologize for this error and state that this does not change the scientific conclusions of the article in any way. The original article has been updated.
Statements
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Summary
Keywords
classical test theory, item response theory, psychological wellbeing, psychometrics, wellbeing, health
Citation
Garcia D, Kazemitabar M and Habibi Asgarabad M (2023) Corrigendum: The 18-item Swedish version of Ryff's psychological wellbeing scale: psychometric properties based on classical test theory and item response theory. Front. Psychol. 14:1324006. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1324006
Received
20 October 2023
Accepted
24 October 2023
Published
03 November 2023
Volume
14 - 2023
Edited and reviewed by
Murat Yildirim, Aǧri İbrahim Çeçen University, Türkiye
Updates
Copyright
© 2023 Garcia, Kazemitabar and Habibi Asgarabad.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Danilo Garcia danilo.garcia@icloud.comMojtaba Habibi Asgarabad mojtaba.h.asgarabad@ntnu.no
†These authors have contributed equally to this work and share first authorship
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.