CORRECTION article

Front. Psychol., 08 August 2025

Sec. Personality and Social Psychology

Volume 16 - 2025 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1663653

Correction: Personality traits can predict which exercise intensities we enjoy most, and the magnitude of stress reduction experienced following a training program

  • 1. Institute of Sport, Exercise and Health, University College London, London, United Kingdom

  • 2. Institute of Cognitive Neuroscience, University College London, London, United Kingdom

Article metrics

View details

1

Citations

2,8k

Views

349

Downloads

In the published article, there was an error in the author list.

Author Benjamin Tari was erroneously assigned as corresponding author. The correct corresponding author is Flaminia Ronca.

There was a mistake in Tables 3, 4 as published. Both tables are missing the columns for estimates and confidence intervals. There was a mistake in the captions of Tables 3, 4 as published. A clarification has been added. The corrected Tables 3, 4, along with their updated captions appear below.

Table 3

Estimate95% CI [LL, UL]pdfFR2
DV: VO2peak
Extraversion1.15[0.36, 1.93]0.006
Sex (male)6.83[3.60, 10.10]< 0.001
Regression< 0.0012, 12013.380.150.13
DV: anaerobic threshold
Extraversion1.40[0.74, 2.05]< 0.001
Sex (male)4.57[1.84, 7.30]0.002
Regression< 0.0012, 12011.330.160.14
DV: peak power output
Extraversion8.06[3.01, 13.11]0.003
Age0.98[0.18, 1.78]0.018
Sex (male)99.56[79.70, 120.40]< 0.001
Regression< 0.0013, 11935.40.470.46
DV: heart rate recovery
Neuroticism−2.19[−3.58, −0.81]0.0031, 669.540.130.12
DV: press-ups
Conscientiousness2.17[0.91, 3.36]< 0.001
Age−0.29[−0.47, −0.11]0.001
Sex (male)23.32[18.74, 27.90]< 0.001
Regression< 0.0013, 11833.130.480.44
DV: plank time
Conscientiousness3.97[0.06, 7.89]0.0461, 1224.060.030.02
DV: PA weekly hours
Conscientiousness0.62[0.22, 1.22]0.002
Sex (male)2.15[0.64, 3.66]0.014
Regression0.0012, 1067.200.120.11
DV: body fat %
Conscientiousness−0.56[−1.10, −0.01]0.039
Age0.20[.12, 0.28]< 0.001
Sex (male)−7.76[−9.80, −5.62]< 0.001
Regression< 0.0013, 12423.430.360.35
DV: muscle mass
Age0.18[.09, 0.27]< 0.001
Sex (male)17.96[15.61, 20.30]< 0.001
Regression< 0.0012, 125128.80.670.67

Multiple linear regression output for each component of baseline physical fitness following backward elimination.

The full models included all Big Five personality traits, age and sex.

Full models included all Big Five personality traits + Sex + Age, predictors were removed via backward elimination until all variables were significant (p < 0.05).

Table 4

EstimateCI [LL, UL]pdfFR2
DV: enjoyed stretching
Neuroticism0.18[0.03, 0.33]0.0231, 325.580.150.12
DV: enjoyed strength session
Sex (male)0.10[−0.04, 0.24]0.181, 501.990.040.03
DV: enjoyed lab low intensity session
Neuroticism−0.25[−0.42, −0.08]0.0051, 438.740.170.15
DV: enjoyed easy long ride
Agreeableness0.24[0.01, 0.27]0.0491, 424.110.090.07
DV: enjoyed threshold ride
Neuroticism−0.19[−0.35, −0.03]0.02411.29
Openness−0.25[−0.40, −0.090.00515.13
Sex (male)−0.63[−1.21, −0.05]0.03114.73
Regression0.0153, 513.850.180.14
DV: enjoyed high intensity interval ride
Extraversion0.21[0.01, 0.43]0.03110.68
Openness−0.40[−0.65, −0.15]0.00419.10
Regression0.0121, 464.890.180.14
DV: enjoyed lab VO2peaktest
Extraversion0.13[0.02, 0.25]0.0391, 1174.320.040.03

Multiple linear regression outputs predicting enjoyment of each exercise session with personality traits following backward elimination.

The full models included all Big Five personality traits, age and sex.

There was an error in the Results section: Figure 4 was omitted. Figure 4 and its corresponding information are provided below.

Figure 4 should be cited in the following sentence, at the end of the Results section, under “Intervention Outcomes”.

Furthermore, participants who scored high on neuroticism reported a greater decrease in stress after the intervention, F(1, 49) = 9.94, p = 0.003, = 0.15 (Figure 4).

Figure 4 and its caption appear below.

Figure 4

Scatter plot showing the relationship between neuroticism and change in stress, with separate regression lines for control (blue) and intervention (red) groups. The intervention group shows a steeper negative correlation. Data points are dispersed with shaded confidence intervals around the lines.

Relationship between neuroticism scores and changes in stress after the 8-week period. The prediction was significant in the intervention group only (R2 = 0.17, p = 0.003).

The original version of this article has been updated.

Statements

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Summary

Keywords

Big Five, physical activity, neuroticism, exercise tailoring, fitness

Citation

Ronca F, Tari B, Xu C and Burgess PW (2025) Correction: Personality traits can predict which exercise intensities we enjoy most, and the magnitude of stress reduction experienced following a training program. Front. Psychol. 16:1663653. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1663653

Received

10 July 2025

Accepted

17 July 2025

Published

08 August 2025

Volume

16 - 2025

Edited and reviewed by

Aleksandra Maria Rogowska, University of Opole, Poland

Updates

Copyright

*Correspondence: Flaminia Ronca

Disclaimer

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Outline

Figures

Cite article

Copy to clipboard


Export citation file


Share article

Article metrics