Abstract
Introduction:
Eating disorders are complex disorders characterized by a persistent disturbance of eating that impairs health and psychosocial functioning, with accompanying long-lasting effects on the individual’s overall health and well-being. Presumed stereotypes may affect reporting and access to care, especially in the Caribbean, where ethnic groups are mostly non-White. This study reviewed the clinical presentation, management, and outcomes of eating disorders in adolescents and young adults in Kingston, Jamaica. It explored the factors that influence outcomes – hospital admission and recovery.
Methods:
This retrospective case review study included male and female adolescents and young adult participants (10–29 years old) being treated for an eating disorder in Kingston, Jamaica. Data were extracted from the medical records of patients meeting the inclusion criteria for the period January 2010 to December 2020. Sociodemographic data, medical and psychological symptoms and signs, management and outcomes were extracted. Descriptive analyses were performed - proportions and frequencies for categorical variables; means and medians for continuous variables. Inferential analyses including the independent student’s t-test and analysis of variance were used to compare means and the Pearson chi-squared test used to determine the association between categorical variables. Logistic regression analyses examined predictors of outcome. Analyses were performed using SPSS version 23. Statistical significance was determined at the 5% level.
Results:
The study included 68 participants with a female preponderance (n = 60, 88.2%). Other specified food and eating disorders (OSFED) (n = 27, 39.7%) was the most common subtype seen in the sample population, and included atypical anorexia nervosa (AAN) (n = 18, 26.5%). Eleven (16.2%) participants were admitted to the hospital, the majority diagnosed with OSFED (n = 6, 54.5%). The most common reason for admission was failure of outpatient management (n = 7, 63.6%) but also included admissions for active suicidal ideation (n = 1) and late presentation of significant severity (n = 2). Multidisciplinary management by an ED-trained physician, ED-psychologist, and dietician was utilized in most participants.
Discussion:
Eating disorders are an emerging health concern worldwide, as well as in Jamaica. OSFED with a preponderance of atypical anorexia nervosa is the most prevalent, with overall female preponderance. These findings necessitate the implementation of measures in Jamaica in the realms of identification, prevention, and treatment.
Introduction
Eating disorders (EDs) are complex biopsychosocial disorders characterized by a persistent disturbance of eating which impairs health and psychosocial functioning that usually have their onset during adolescence (Golden et al., 2015). Eating disorders may be considered psychiatric illnesses with potential for grave medical consequences with significant morbidity affecting multiple systems, and may even result in mortality. The prevalence of eating disorders - anorexia nervosa (AN), bulimia nervosa (BN), binge-eating disorder (BED), avoidant/restrictive food intake disorder (ARFID) and other specified feeding or eating disorder (OSFED), has increased over the decades globally (Galmiche et al., 2019; van Hoeken and Hoek, 2020). Despite this, EDs continue to be under-represented or misdiagnosed by professionals (van Hoeken and Hoek, 2020). A high index of suspicion is required, particularly among children and adolescents, where EDs may present differently (Campbell and Peebles, 2014). Eating disorders may present with a myriad of physical symptoms, ranging from vague abdominal symptoms such as constipation, a sense of bloating, to abdominal pain or vomiting; cardiovascular instability with near syncope or syncopal events, significant postural changes in pulse rate and or blood pressure, as well as arrythmias - sinus bradycardia being most common; headaches or difficulties concentrating.
Persons suffering from EDs may also have delayed presentation for treatment due to the persistent stigma regarding mental illness in general and by extension EDs, and even more so given the high prevalence of comorbid mental disorders, such as depression and anxiety with EDs (Rikani et al., 2013).
Inherent misunderstanding regarding the epidemiology of EDs may result in missed screening opportunities for disordered eating behaviors in certain sub-populations, such as people of color (Becker et al., 2003), and in countries where the resources to treat and where training are limited (Harrison et al., 2020). Sala and colleagues propose that American adolescents with eating disorders in the Black, Indigenous, People of Color (BIPOC) group may receive suboptimal care for varied reasons, inclusive of atypical presentations as well as a lower likelihood of screening for EDs by healthcare providers (HCPs). The latter may be due to the misconception of low prevalence among the BIPOC sub-population (Sala et al., 2013). Countries like Jamaica, with an ethnically diverse population and where the majority are of Afro-Caribbean descent, may have similar inherent misconceptions (Caribbean Community Secretariat, 2025).
There is a dearth of information in Jamaica related to the prevalence, incidence, and biopsychosocial effects of eating disorders in adolescence and beyond. A dated review of ED in Jamaica (1985–1998) concluded the prevalence of eating disorders was very low (White and Gardner, 2002). However, more recently, a rise in the prevalence of disordered eating behaviors and attitudes in Jamaican adolescents has been reported, with as many as 1 in 5 adolescents being considered ‘at-risk’ of developing an ED, comparable with some high-income countries (Harrison et al., 2020). More disconcerting are the limited local and regional healthcare providers specially trained in the management of EDs in adolescents, with no healthcare facilities designed specifically to treat these conditions and a paucity of local evidence-based guidance. This may leave patients and their families feeling unsupported (Johns et al., 2019) and practitioners ill-equipped at identifying and making the appropriate timely referrals.
This study sets out to achieve two major objectives: (1) to examine the clinical presentation, management, and outcomes of eating disorders among Jamaican adolescents and young adults (AYAs), 10–29 years old, and (2) to explore the factors that influence outcomes – hospital admission, and recovery.
This study sought to answer the following research questions:
What are the characteristics of the Jamaican patients who were diagnosed with an eating disorder?
What were the observed clinical features of the patients for each ED category?
What were the psychological symptoms that patients reported in addition to their ED?
What were the treatment outcomes of the ED patients seen?
Methods
Study design
A retrospective chart review study design was utilized to examine adolescent and young adult patients diagnosed with an eating disorder. Patients included in this chart review were those who were diagnosed with an eating disorder and received treatment at the University Hospital of the West Indies (UHWI) by the psychiatry and or adolescent medicine teams; as well as those patients seen privately by psychiatrists, adolescent medicine specialists, and psychologists, in the Kingston metropolitan region, Jamaica, from January 2010 to December 2020.
Participants and sample size
The medical records department performed an electronic search for all the patients attending UHWI (inpatients and outpatients) with a primary or secondary diagnosis of anorexia nervosa, bulimia nervosa, binge eating disorder, eating disorder, or disordered eating, to ensure retrieval of all possible patients with an ED, including those that may have been mislabeled when recorded in the medical records system. Relevant soft or hard copy files were then retrieved from the records department for review by the researchers. Potential participants in the private practice setting in Kingston were identified by inviting the healthcare providers through their professional organisations via the usual communication route of email, to identify patients they had managed during the study period. The relevant charts were then made available for review by the researchers with the approval of the specific health care provider in their offices. All patients meeting the inclusion (formally diagnosed with an eating disorder; age 10 – 29 years) and exclusion criteria (no formal diagnosis of ED or outside age range) (see Figure 1).
Figure 1
Measures
Data was extracted on questions such as lifetime diagnosis of psychiatric illness(s), sociodemographic characteristics, first consultation for ED and what prompted the consultation, psychiatric comorbidities, treatment histories [non-pharmacotherapy and pharmacotherapy] and treatment effects.
Participants were categorized by age – early adolescence (10–15y), late adolescence (16–19y), and young adulthood (20–29y); and nutritional status using body mass index (BMI) – underweight, normal, overweight, and obesity (Kuczmarski et al., 2000; Guo et al., 2002).
For participants less than 20 years old, the following definitions were used: Underweight: BMI < 5th centile for age; Normal: BMI 5th to < 85th centile; Overweight: BMI 85th – < 95th centile; Obesity: BMI ≥ 95th centile.
For patients aged ≥ 20 years, the following criteria were applied - Underweight: BMI < 18.5 kg/m2; Normal: BMI 18.5–24.9 kg/m2; Overweight: BMI 25–29.9 kg/m2; Obesity: BMI ≥ 30.
Ethical considerations
The study protocol and data extraction form were reviewed and approved by the local Institutional Review Board (IRB). All the precautions were taken to maintain confidentiality and compliance with the Declaration of Helsinki. When applicable, patient/parent consent was obtained. All data collected were deidentified and saved electronically, with only researchers with direct responsibility for data entry and analysis having access to the data. Written consent was obtained from those participants who were minors (under 18 years) at the time of treatment, and assent for those who are still less than 18 years, along with parental consent.
Statistical analysis
Descriptive analyses were performed using proportions and frequencies for categorical variables and means and medians to describe dispersion for continuous variables. Inferential analyses were performed using the Independent Student’s t test and analysis of variance as appropriate to compare means, and the Pearson Chi-squared test was used to determine the association between categorical variables. The relationship between hospital admission and defaulting from medical care follow-up was examined against predictors using logistic regression models. We first examined each predictor using a univariate model and then using a multivariable model adjusting for confounders such as sex, age, family history of comorbid mental health conditions, and personal mental health co-morbid conditions (anxiety/depression) and history of abuse. To account for missing data, we sought to conduct all our analyses using a complete case analysis approach. All analyses were performed using SPSS version 23, and statistical significance was determined at the 5% level.
Results
A total of 68 patients diagnosed with an ED were reviewed, with a female preponderance (F: n = 60, 88.2%; M: n = 8, 11.8%). Thirteen (19.1%) participants were diagnosed with anorexia nervosa (AN); 18 (26.5%) with bulimia nervosa (BN); 7 (10.3%) with binge eating disorder (BED); 3 (4.4%) with avoidant restrictive food intake disorder (ARFID) and 27 (39.7%) with other specified food and eating disorder (OSFED) - atypical AN = 18 (26.47%); other OSFED = 9 (13.24%). The sample was comprised of early adolescents (n = 22, 32.4%), late adolescents (n = 32, 47.1%), and young adults (n = 14, 20.6%) which approached statistical significance regarding onset of DEBAs by ED diagnosis (p = 0.071) (Table 1). We found no statistically significant differences in the mean age of onset or age at formal diagnosis of an ED. We observed statistically significant associations between ED diagnosis and nutritional status (p = <0.001); family history of psychiatric illness (p = 0.012), and triggers for onset of ED (p = 0.028), with those patients diagnosed with OSFED being most likely to report family stressors as the trigger for their ED symptomatology. Eleven (16.2%) patients were admitted during the review period (AN = 4; BN = 1; OSFED = 6) secondary to failed outpatient management (n = 7); active suicidal ideation (n = 1); and severe presentation (biochemical derangement; cardiovascular instability) due to delayed diagnosis (n = 3). There were no deaths reported during the study period.
Table 1
| Characteristic | Total N (%) | AN n (%) | BN n (%) | BED n (%) | ARFID n (%) | OSFED n (%) | p-value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sex | 0.494 | ||||||
| Male | 8 (11.8) | 1 (12.5) | 2 (25.0) | 2 (25.0) | 1 (12.5) | 2 (25.0) | |
| Female | 60 (88.2) | 12 (20.0) | 15 (25.0) | 6 (10.0) | 2 (3.3) | 25 (41.7) | |
| Age category at first presentation | 0.071 | ||||||
| Early adolescence (10–14 y) | 22 (32.4) | 3 (13.6) | 3 (13.6) | 2 (9.1) | 0 (0.0) | 14 (63.6) | |
| Late adolescence (15–19 y) | 32 (47.1) | 8 (25.0) | 9 (28.1) | 2 (6.3) | 2 (6.3) | 11 (34.4) | |
| Young adult (≥20 y) | 14 (20.6) | 2 (14.3) | 5 (35.7) | 4 (28.6) | 1 (7.1) | 2 (14.3) | |
| Mean age (years) at onset of DEBAs, mean (SD) | 13.8 (2.6) | 13.4 (2.7) | 13.9 (1.8) | 15.2 (4.6) | 15.5 (0.7) | 13.6 (2.6) | 0.635 |
| Mean age (years) at formal ED diagnosis, mean (SD) | 15.7 (3.7) | 16.0 (3.6) | 17.2 (2.1) | 18.8 (4.4) | 15.5 (0.7) | 14.5 (4.1) | 0.117 |
| Duration (years) onset → diagnosis, mean (SD) | 1.9 (3.5) | 2.7 (4.1) | 3.3 (2.6) | 3.5 (3.5) | 0.0 (0.0) | 0.9 (3.5) | 0.212 |
| Nutritional status on presentation | <0.001 | ||||||
| Underweight | 17 (25.0) | 11 (64.7) | 2 (11.8) | 1 (5.9) | 3 (17.6) | 0 (0.0) | |
| Normal weight | 37 (54.4) | 2 (5.4) | 10 (27.0) | 2 (5.4) | 0 (0.0) | 23 (62.2) | |
| Overweight | 6 (8.8) | 0 (0.0) | 4 (66.7) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 2 (33.3) | |
| Obesity | 8 (11.8) | 0 (0.0) | 1 (12.5) | 5 (62.5) | 0 (0.0) | 2 (25.0) | |
| Sexual orientation | 0.969 | ||||||
| Heterosexual | 61 (89.7) | 12 (19.7) | 15 (24.6) | 7 (11.5) | 3 (4.9) | 24 (39.3) | |
| LGBTQ | 7 (10.3) | 1 (14.3) | 2 (28.6) | 1 (14.3) | 0 (0.0) | 3 (42.9) | |
| Ever admitted (inpatient) | 0.159 | ||||||
| No | 54 (83.1) | 9 (16.7) | 16 (29.6) | 8 (14.8) | 3 (5.6) | 18 (33.3) | |
| Yes | 11 (16.9) | 4 (36.4) | 1 (9.1) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 6 (54.5) | |
| Defaulted from medical follow-up | 0.632 | ||||||
| No | 37 (56.9) | 8 (21.6) | 9 (24.3) | 6 (16.2) | 2 (5.4) | 12 (32.4) | |
| Yes | 28 (43.1) | 4 (14.3) | 8 (28.6) | 2 (7.1) | 1 (3.6) | 13 (46.4) | |
| Family history of eating disorder | 0.785 | ||||||
| No | 56 (88.9) | 11 (19.6) | 14 (25.0) | 8 (14.3) | 3 (5.4) | 20 (35.7) | |
| Yes | 7 (11.1) | 2 (28.6) | 2 (28.6) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 3 (42.9) | |
| Family history of psychiatric illness | 0.012 | ||||||
| No | 46 (73.0) | 10 (21.7) | 14 (30.4) | 8 (17.4) | 3 (6.5) | 11 (23.9) | |
| Yes | 17 (27.0) | 2 (11.8) | 3 (17.6) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 12 (70.6) | |
| Personal history of abuse | 0.509 | ||||||
| No | 54 (81.8) | 12 (22.2) | 12 (22.2) | 7 (13.0) | 3 (5.6) | 20 (37.0) | |
| Yes | 12 (18.2) | 1 (8.3) | 5 (41.7) | 1 (8.3) | 0 (0.0) | 5 (41.7) | |
| Reported trigger for ED symptomatology | 0.028 | ||||||
| Family stressor | 21 (38.9) | 1 (4.8) | 3 (14.3) | 4 (19.0) | 1 (4.8) | 12 (57.1) | |
| Social stressor | 14 (25.9) | 1 (7.1) | 7 (50.0) | 2 (14.3) | 1 (7.1) | 3 (21.4) | |
| Other stressor | 19 (35.2) | 7 (36.8) | 6 (31.6) | 2 (10.5) | 0 (0.0) | 4 (21.1) |
Patient characteristics of sample population by ED diagnosis.
ED, eating disorders; AN, anorexia nervosa; BN, bulimia nervosa; BED, binge eating disorder; ARFID, avoidant restrictive/food intake disorder; OSFED, other specified eating disorder; DEBAs, disordered eating behaviors and attitudes; Triggers: Family-related stressor (parental discord, family pressure and loss); Social-related stressor (no voice, rejection, isolation, cyberbullying); Other (Sport injury).
The clinical features are described in Table 2 by ED category. At-risk behaviors observed found excessive exercise, calorie counting, and self-induced vomiting were the most prevalent. Excessive exercise was statistically associated with ED diagnosis (p = 0.029), being most prevalent among those with OSFED.
Table 2
| Feature | Total | AN | BN | BED | ARFID | OSFED | p-value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Common behaviors reported | |||||||
| Self-induced vomiting | 17 (100) | 4 (23.5) | 5 (29.4) | 1 (5.9) | 0 (0.0) | 7 (41.2) | 0.733 |
| Excess exercise | 24 (100) | 8 (33.3) | 5 (20.8) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 11 (45.8) | 0.029 |
| Calorie counting | 19 (100) | 7 (36.8) | 5 (26.3) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 7 (36.8) | 0.103 |
| Laxative use | 4 (100) | 1 (25.0) | 2 (50.0) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 1 (25.0) | 0.772 |
| Diuretics use | 1 (100) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 1 (100.0) | 0.780 |
| CAM for weight loss | 3 (100) | 0 (0.0) | 2 (66.7) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 1 (33.3) | 0.547 |
| Presenting symptoms and signs | |||||||
| Migraine | 7 (100) | 1 (14.3) | 1 (14.3) | 1 (14.3) | 0 (0.0) | 4 (57.1) | 0.780 |
| Syncope/near-syncope | 15 (100) | 4 (26.7) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 11 (73.3) | 0.003 |
| Palpitations | 11 (100) | 4 (36.4) | 0 (0.0) | 1 (9.1) | 1 (9.1) | 5 (45.5) | 0.172 |
| Difficulty concentrating | 27 (100) | 8 (29.6) | 4 (14.8) | 2 (7.4) | 2 (7.4) | 11 (40.7) | 0.192 |
| Blurred vision | 1 (100) | 1 (100.0) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 0.397 |
| Abdominal pain | 22 (100) | 8 (36.4) | 4 (18.2) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 10 (45.5) | 0.027 |
| Cold intolerance | 16 (100) | 6 (37.5) | 2 (12.5) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 8 (50.0) | 0.050 |
| Alopecia | 10 (100) | 4 (40.0) | 3 (30.0) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 3 (30.0) | 0.392 |
| Constipation | 10 (100) | 4 (40.0) | 2 (20.0) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 4 (40.0) | 0.327 |
| Difficulty falling asleep | 16 (100) | 1 (6.3) | 4 (25.0) | 1 (6.3) | 1 (6.3) | 9 (56.3) | 0.303 |
| Nocturia/Difficulty staying asleep | 5 (100) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 5 (100.0) | 0.061 |
| Amenorrhoea | 15 (100) | 7 (46.7) | 2 (13.3) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 6 (40.0) | 0.017 |
The clinical features noted in patients by eating disorder category.
p-values represent Pearson chi-square analysis.
AN, anorexia nervosa; BN, bulimia nervosa; BED, binge eating disorder; ARFID, avoidant restrictive/food intake disorder; OSFED, other specified feeding or eating disorder; CAM, complementary alternative medicine.
The most prevalent symptoms observed were difficulty concentrating, abdominal pain or discomfort, difficulty falling asleep and cold intolerance. We found statistically significant associations with some symptoms such as migraine headaches, blurred vision and nocturia in relation to ED diagnoses, with greater prevalence in participants with anorexia nervosa.
Table 3 presents the frequency of psychological symptoms by ED category. The most prevalent symptoms were anxiety (n = 36; 52.9%), mood fluctuations (n = 30; 44.1%) and social withdrawal (n = 22; 32.4%). We found no statistically significant associations between ED category and psychological symptoms. Thirty two (47.1%) patients were placed on psychiatric medication, most commonly an SSRI (n = 24; 75%), followed by an atypical antipsychotic (n = 4; 12.5%).
Table 3
| Symptom | Total N (%) | AN n (%) | BN n (%) | BED n (%) | ARFID n (%) | OSFED n (%) | p-value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Symptoms of anxiety | 36 (100) | 8 (22.2) | 8 (22.2) | 2 (5.6) | 2 (5.6) | 16 (44.4) | 0.288 |
| Substance misuse | 7 (100) | 0 (0.0) | 4 (57.1) | 1 (14.3) | 0 (0.0) | 2 (28.6) | 0.260 |
| Depressive symptoms | 21 (100) | 4 (19.0) | 5 (23.8) | 2 (9.5) | 0 (0.0) | 10 (47.6) | 0.753 |
| Social withdrawal | 22 (100) | 5 (22.7) | 6 (27.3) | 1 (4.5) | 1 (4.5) | 9 (40.9) | 0.700 |
| Irritability | 13 (100) | 2 (15.4) | 2 (15.4) | 0 (0.0) | 1 (7.7) | 8 (61.5) | 0.140 |
| Mood fluctuation | 30 (100) | 7 (23.3) | 8 (26.7) | 1 (3.3) | 1 (3.3) | 13 (43.3) | 0.208 |
| Suicidal ideation | 17 (100) | 2 (11.8) | 5 (29.4) | 2 (11.8) | 0 (0.0) | 8 (47.1) | 0.540 |
| Suicide attempt | 5 (100) | 0 (0.0) | 2 (40.0) | 1 (20.0) | 0 (0.0) | 2 (40.0) | 0.759 |
| Non-suicidal self-injury | 9 (100) | 1 (11.1) | 2 (22.2) | 1 (11.1) | 0 (0.0) | 5 (55.6) | 0.713 |
Frequency of psychological symptoms among participants by eating disorder category.
AN, anorexia nervosa; BN, bulimia nervosa; BED, binge eating disorder; ARFID, avoidant restrictive/food intake disorder; OSFED, other specified feeding or eating disorder.
Table 4 presents the associations between therapy intervention characteristics and ED category. Readiness is an important concept in psychology, which refers to the motivation and willingness for change (Krampe et al., 2017). In this study, clinical judgement was used by the provider to determine readiness, which was informed by the transtheoretical model of change (Norcross and Lambert, 2018).
Table 4
| Variable | Total | AN | BN | BED | ARFID | OSFED | p-value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Readiness for therapy | 0.054 | ||||||
| Very ready | 2 (100) | 1 (50.0) | 0 (0.0) | 1 (50.0) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | |
| Ready | 39 (100) | 4 (10.3) | 16 (41.0) | 6 (15.4) | 2 (5.1) | 11 (28.2) | |
| Somewhat ready | 15 (100) | 5 (33.3) | 1 (6.7) | 1 (6.7) | 0 (0.0) | 8 (53.3) | |
| Therapy modality used | 0.551 | ||||||
| Individual | 18 (100) | 3 (16.7) | 5 (27.8) | 5 (27.8) | 0 (0.0) | 5 (27.8) | |
| Individual + family | 35 (100) | 7 (20.0) | 11 (31.4) | 2 (5.7) | 2 (5.7) | 13 (37.1) | |
| Individual but family planned | 2 (100) | 0 (0.0) | 1 (50.0) | 1 (50.0) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | |
| Response to therapy | 0.023 | ||||||
| Client is pleased | 38 (100) | 7 (18.4) | 12 (31.6) | 6 (15.8) | 1 (2.6) | 12 (31.6) | |
| Client seems hopeful | 5 (100) | 0 (0.0) | 1 (20.0) | 2 (40.0) | 0 (0.0) | 2 (40.0) | |
| Pleased + occasional consult | 7 (100) | 2 (28.6) | 2 (28.6) | 0 (0.0) | 2 (28.6) | 1 (14.3) | |
| Unknown | 10 (100) | 4 (40.0) | 2 (20.0) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 4 (40.0) | |
| Continues to struggle | 4 (100) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 4 (100.0) | |
| Discontinued therapy | 4 (100) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 4 (100.0) |
Non-pharmacotherapy treatment and ED category.
ED, eating disorders; AN, anorexia nervosa; BN, bulimia nervosa; BED, binge eating disorder; ARFID, avoidant restrictive/food intake disorder; OSFED, other specified feeding or eating disorder.
We found that most participants stated they were ready to be involved in therapy related to their ED diagnosis (p = 0.054), with more participants with bulimia nervosa being ready or very ready for therapy. In addition, the response to therapy, which was based on feedback provided by the patient to the provider (feedback was based on a set of informal questions about what worked and what did not work), showed that most participants were pleased with the therapy they are presently receiving, significantly more so among patients with OSFED (p = 0.023).
Table 5 shows the multivariable logistic regression model examining the relationship between ED diagnoses and outcomes - hospital admission and default from follow-up. We found that compared to the other ED categories, participants diagnosed with anorexia nervosa had significantly higher odds of being admitted to hospital (OR = 13.53, p = 0.036) and less likely to default medical-care follow-up (OR = 0.14, p = 0.035). Those diagnosed with OSFED were at significantly higher odds of defaulting from medical follow-up (OR 26.01; p = 0.028).
Table 5
| Predictor | Hospital admission | Default from medical care | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| OR (95% CI) | p-value | OR (95% CI) | p-value | |
| ED Diagnosis | ||||
| AN | 13.53 (1.18–154.61) | 0.036* | 0.14 (0.02–0.87) | 0.035* |
| BN | 0.22 (0.02–3.13) | 0.266 | 1.77 (0.32–9.84) | 0.516 |
| OSFED | 1.01 (0.13–7.66) | 0.993 | 2.62 (0.39–17.74) | 0.323 |
| ED type | ||||
| AN | Ref | Ref | ||
| BN | 1.77 × 10−2 (1.64 ×10−7, 1.86) | 0.074 | 11.07 (0.65, 189.41) | 0.097 |
| BED | NA | NA | 21.22 (0.53, 842.38) | 0.104 |
| ARFID | NA | NA | NA | NA |
| OSFED | 0.32 (0.01, 8.37) | 0.496 | 26.01 (1.43, 474.49) | 0.028* |
| Sex | ||||
| Male | Ref | Ref | ||
| Female | 0.46 (0.02, 12.31) | 0.644 | NA | NA |
| Age category | ||||
| Early adolescence | Ref | Ref | ||
| Late adolescence | 0.18 (0.01, 3.14) | 0.239 | 8.23 (0.71, 95.73) | 0.092 |
| Young adult | NA | NA | 0.30 (0.02, 5.75) | 0.425 |
| Duration of having an ED | 1.52 (0.73, 3.14) | 0.262 | 1.31 (0.92, 1.85) | 0.132 |
| On psychotropic medication | 1.56 (0.07, 33.16) | 0.775 | 1.82 (0.25, 13.13) | 0.551 |
| Diagnosed with depression | 0.12 (0.01, 1.85) | 0.130 | 7.31 (0.96, 55.92) | 0.055 |
| Diagnosed with anxiety | 1.75 (0.09, 33.61) | 0.711 | 2.13 (0.31, 14.64) | 0.441 |
| History of abuse | 60.36 (0.53, 6810.68) | 0.089 | 0.97 (0.09, 10.68) | 0.979 |
| Family history of ED | 0.64 (0.03, 13.39) | 0.773 | NA | NA |
| Family history of psychiatric illness | 0.18 (0.00, 9.68) | 0.398 | 0.08 (0.00, 1.14) | 0.062 |
Predictors for hospital admission and defaulting from medical care.
OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval; AN, anorexia nervosa; BN, bulimia nervosa; BED, binge eating disorder; ARFID, avoidant/restrictive food intake disorder; OSFED, other specified feeding or eating disorder; *p < 0.05. All models adjusted for sex, age at first ED physician visit, duration, depression, anxiety, history of abuse, family history of eating disorders, and family history of psychiatric disorders.
Discussion
This review of the clinical features, management and note of adolescents and young adults living with an eating disorder in the Jamaican metropolis, Kingston, revealed two major findings, (1) an increased prevalence compared with a similar previous study (White and Gardner, 2002) with a persistent female preponderance and; (2) even though the majority of patients were managed as outpatients, as many as 1 in 6 AYAs (n = 11; 16.2%) were admitted for care, most commonly due to failed outpatient management. These findings challenge previous stereotypes by providing evidence that eating disorder cases are present not only in White industrialized countries but in all groups, in this study, among a predominantly Black ethnic population in a developing country.
We determined a tripling of patients (n = 68) diagnosed with an eating disorder two plus decades prior, over a similar time period to that reviewed by White and Gardener (n = 22) (White and Gardner, 2002). This increase is not unique to Jamaica, as similar findings are being reported globally (Da Luz et al., 2017; Kolar et al., 2016; Stark-Wroblewski et al., 2005; Morris et al., 2022). Notwithstanding, an increase in this developing context is of concern as the country is ill-equipped to care for individuals with EDs, with implications for a potential increase in the morbidity and mortality rates, potentiated by a lack of timely identification and intervention for those suffering from this illness.
We report a persistence of female predominance, but must highlight that males comprise 15% of the sample population, a novel and significant finding, almost doubling previous reports of 9% males (White and Gardner, 2002). This is in tandem with other local data which identified 17% of male adolescents as ‘at risk’ of developing an eating disorder’ using the EAT-26 screening tool (score >20), an increased prevalence of disordered eating behaviors over the decade prior (Harrison et al., 2020).
Furthermore, our findings may yet reflect underreporting, given the significant stigma that surrounds psychiatric diagnoses in Jamaica (Arthur et al., 2010; Arthur and Whitley, 2015), which may result in avoidance and rejection of an ED diagnosis, more so when it comes to males, as EDs are often referred to as a “female illness.” There is limited research presented on the characteristics of eating disorders among Black people, with most of the research focusing primarily on what is believed to be the most common type of eating disorder among Black people, Binge Eating Disorder (Yeboah et al., 2024), with AN rarely being reported in this population (Taylor et al., 2007). While not negating the occurrence of BED or associated symptoms among Black people (Dickens et al., 2024; Yoon et al., 2023), we caution against stereotypes being applied to ethnic groups regarding a subtype of ED, as this may result in those who fall outside of this category having challenges in being recognized (Sala et al., 2024) and treated appropriately (Moreno et al., 2023). Contrary to previous research, our study reports several classifications of ED being identified, with AN and OSFED (here comprised mainly of atypical AN) the most common subtypes identified in this ethnically diverse sample.
We report outcomes comparable to those in resource-competent spaces (Schmidt et al., 2025), however, we did have higher hospitalization rates (17%) than in some high-income countries (5.6%) (Lau et al., 2022). Patients suffering from an eating disorder may be admitted for a variety of medical or psychological indications - we identified failed outpatient management as the most common cause for admission in our sample. Noteworthy is that among the failed outpatient management, there were some instances of delayed intervention due to missed opportunities for diagnosis; this speaks to the need for ongoing training of healthcare providers in the identification of these patients.
There is a dearth of trained eating disorder professionals in Jamaica and the Caribbean. In 2009/2010, two such professionals (adolescent medicine physician and clinical psychologist) returned from overseas training and started a small ED management team, the first of its kind in Jamaica, co-opting other non-ED trained providers (psychiatrist, dietician) as needed. Our higher hospital admission rate may reflect a more cautious approach, given the small team available to manage both in-patients and out-patients. Delay in admission may result in further deterioration, and when later admitted in extremis, the in-patient management would likely be more challenging and more resource depleting.
Our findings add to the support of personalized treatment plans for patients and their families, which could be developed by a small, dedicated team in other similarly resource poor settings. However, with caution, as this model may not be sustainable, particularly as the prevalence of EDs increases, reaffirming the need to build capacity among healthcare providers in Jamaica and the Caribbean.
We face similar challenges to industrialized settings where eating disorder education and awareness remain relatively low (Moreno et al., 2023). Further, symptoms may be attributed to supernatural forces (Arthur et al., 2010; Arthur and Whitley, 2015) or may be mistakenly diagnosed as a physical illness or overlooked by physicians. This is cause for concern, especially considering that early detection and treatment of EDs improve prognosis (Nazar et al., 2017; Treasure et al., 2015). Sharing this evidence of the physical and psychological presentations and outcomes associated with eating disorders may serve to highlight the potential severity of the illness, as well as contradict the concept that the range of eating disorders do not exist among Black people, and more specifically among Jamaicans.
Previous studies have found identification of triggers to be particularly useful in aiding prevention and intervention. Two recent retrospective chart review studies in the USA (Lin et al., 2023) and Canada (Chen and Couturier, 2019) found that among a sample of White adolescents diagnosed with AN, factors such as environment, the internalization of the thin ideal, and health education triggered the onset of their illness. Our findings extended to include all ED categories, and highlighted the significant role of the family, with more than half of the patients identifying family as the trigger for their illness. The difference between our findings and that of industrialized White populations, underscores the relevance of culture-specific studies, especially among a vastly understudied sample. These findings are not surprising considering that Jamaica is classified a collectivist society (Hofstede, 2011) where the voices and opinions of the family are held in high regard and where there is evidence of authoritarian parenting styles and hierarchical power (UNICEF, 2010; Lipps et al., 2012).
In the Caribbean context, this parenting style is believed to have been influenced by a complex interplay of unique cultural, sociodemographic, and religious influences, which were born out of the history of slavery, colonialism, and independence. These influence the power dynamics between the adult and the child, where adults are revered with obedience and where there is pressure to conform (Payne, 1989). This “sociohistorical process” has been transferred from generation to generation, influencing families, and how members relate to others (Walkerdine et al., 2013). Within the Jamaican context, parents are described as disciplinarians and authority figures. In this authoritarian engagement, the parent emphasizes their hierarchical power and instils obedience in their children through coercive disciplinary measures such as corporal punishment, shaming, and humiliation, independent of socioeconomic category (Lewis, 2025; Green, 2021). This authoritarian parenting style has been associated with negative psychological, behavioral, emotional, and social outcomes among adolescents, including higher depression levels, low self-esteem, and low self-worth in teens (Jadon and Tripathi, 2017; Mandal et al., 2021; Jannah et al., 2022).
Concerningly, we also note a decrease in the mean age of participants compared to White and Gardener’s findings (White and Gardner, 2002), with our youngest patient in this study having been diagnosed at age ten years. Morris and colleagues report similar findings in Australian adolescents, with the incidence of EDs among children 5-13 years almost doubling over a decade, also with a reduction in the mean age at the time of diagnosis (Morris et al., 2022). The reduction in age of onset may be attributed to more frequent engagement and greater impact of social media and Westernization among Jamaican adolescents, as well as an increased capacity for early detection with the introduction of the aforementioned two subspecialty-trained providers in the healthcare system in the past decade.
The lack of significance of the onset of DEBA by ED category differs from previous studies (Slane et al., 2014; Robinson et al., 2020) that have found significance. An explanation could be the design of the study, as both were longitudinal studies compared to this cross-sectional study. While research on DEBAs and EDs in the English-speaking Caribbean region is in its infancy, we encourage researchers to also consider utilizing other methodologies, including longitudinal studies for a more fulsome understanding of its discourse. Our study found no significance between the mean age of onset for formal diagnosis. This may be attributed to the lack of knowledge and resources to implement routine assessment on body image, eating behaviors and mood, that while performed routinely in developed countries (Klein et al., 2021) does not appear to occur among healthcare providers in Jamaica.
Eating disorders are one of the most significant contributors to years of potential life lost (Chen and Couturier, 2019), and as the prevalence of EDs increases in Jamaica, we recommend that measures be instituted for prevention and treatment, including education of all stakeholders – adolescents/young adults, parents and healthcare providers. This will facilitate more careful screening for DEBAs during routine well visits, facilitating earlier diagnosis and intervention. Specialized multidisciplinary clinics, in- and out-patient treatment facilities, may be beneficial in creating an optimal treatment environment and perhaps decrease the risk of patients defaulting. Investment in the training of personnel specialized in the management of eating disorders, inclusive of dietitians, nurses, psychologists and physicians is expected to improve health outcomes for patients.
Limitations of the study
This study was limited by missing data which is typical of retrospective chart reviews and may have introduced some measurement bias. Therefore, for the current study, we sought to do a complete case analysis based on non-missing data for our main outcome and main exposures. Some patients may also have defaulted from follow-up, limiting the determination of whether they resolved or deteriorated. Future research efforts could consider a prospective study design, which may offer an improved database for analysis, ensuring the collection of all relevant data, or the creation of an ED registry to better follow these patients. While we tried to identify all possible patients with an ED in the Kingston metropolitan region, there is the possibility that some patients may have been missed. This may be attributed to the lack of training and knowledge base as discussed earlier, but beyond healthcare professionals, further to the general society, often in denial of ED existence in Jamaica, assuming the myth of the stereotypes of the White and developed countries only, being the ones to suffer from this illness. Future work should be purposeful in educating the public as well as having standardized measures to ascertain the body image, mood and eating behaviors of young people in Jamaica. Despite these limitations, this study is of importance and relevance as it provides greater insight into the experience of patients with eating disorders and their management and outcome in Jamaica, even as these illnesses become increasingly prevalent in our population.
Conclusion
This review of eating disorders among adolescents and young adults in Jamaica from 2010 to 2020 reveals an increased prevalence, tripling that from only 2 decades prior. As many as 1 in 6 patients required inpatient care in this resource-limited context, highlighting the urgent need for improved human resources, and the implementation of the necessary infrastructure for specialized care for these vulnerable patients to optimize outcomes. This study should raise awareness of eating disorders among healthcare providers in the region and provide evidence-based strategies to facilitate early diagnosis and management in a targeted and culturally appropriate manner.
Statements
Data availability statement
The datasets presented in this article are not readily available because it is a small dataset with a greater need to ensure anonymity. Requests to access the datasets should be directed to abigail.harrison@uwi.edu.
Ethics statement
The studies involving humans were approved by the Mona Campus Research Ethics Committee. The studies were conducted in accordance with the local legislation and institutional requirements. Written informed consent for participation in this study was provided by the participants' legal guardians/next of kin.
Author contributions
AH: Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Resources, Supervision, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. CJ: Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Methodology, Resources, Supervision, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. KF-H: Data curation, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. KR: Data curation, Formal analysis, Methodology, Software, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. GL: Conceptualization, Methodology, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing.
Funding
The author(s) declared that financial support was not received for this work and/or its publication.
Conflict of interest
The author(s) declared that this work was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Generative AI statement
The author(s) declared that Generative AI was not used in the creation of this manuscript.
Any alternative text (alt text) provided alongside figures in this article has been generated by Frontiers with the support of artificial intelligence and reasonable efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, including review by the authors wherever possible. If you identify any issues, please contact us.
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
References
1
ArthurC. M.HicklingF. W.Robertson-HicklingH.Haynes-RobinsonT.AbelW.WhitleyR. (2010). “Mad, sick, head nuh good”: mental illness stigma in Jamaican communities. Transcult. Psychiatry47, 252–275. doi: 10.1177/1363461510368912,
2
ArthurC. M.WhitleyR. (2015). “Head take you”: causal attributions of mental illness in Jamaica. Transcult. Psychiatry52, 115–132. doi: 10.1177/1363461514557065,
3
BeckerA. E.FrankoD. L.SpeckA.HerzogD. B. (2003). Ethnicity and differential access to care for eating disorder symptoms. Int. J. Eat. Disord.33, 205–212. doi: 10.1002/eat.10129,
4
CampbellK.PeeblesR. (2014). Eating disorders in children and adolescents: state of the art review. Pediatrics134, 582–592. doi: 10.1542/peds.2014-0194,
5
Caribbean Community Secretariat (2025). 2000 round of population and housing census project: National Census Report, Jamaica [internet]. Georgetown (GY): Caribbean Community Secretariat.
6
ChenA.CouturierJ. Triggers for Children and Adolescents with Anorexia Nervosa: A Retrospective Chart Review. J. Can. Acad. Child Adolesc. Psychiatry2019;28:134–140.
7
Da LuzF. Q.SainsburyA.MannanH.TouyzS.MitchisonD.HayP. (2017). Prevalence of obesity and comorbid eating disorder behaviors in South Australia from 1995 to 2015. Int. J. Obes.41, 1148–1153. doi: 10.1038/ijo.2017.79,
8
DickensD. D.CabirouL.WomackV.FarmerM.JohnsonN. (2024). The relationship between gendered racism and binge eating symptoms among young adult U.S. Black women: Identity shifting as a mediator. Eat. Behav.54:101906. doi: 10.1007/s13668-024-00517-z
9
GalmicheM.DéchelotteP.LambertG.TavolacciM. P. (2019). Prevalence of eating disorders over the 2000–2018 period: a systematic literature review. Am. J. Clin. Nutr.109, 1402–1413. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/nqy342,
10
GoldenN. H.KatzmanD. K.SawyerS. M.OrnsteinR. M.RomeE. S.GarberA. K.et al. (2015). Update on the medical management of eating disorders in adolescents. J. Adolesc. Health56, 370–375. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2014.11.020,
11
GreenD. P. (2021). Kingstonian parents’ perspectives on discipline using corporal punishment. Minneapolis, MN, United States: Walden University.
12
GuoS. S.WuW.ChumleaW. C.RocheA. F. (2002). Predicting overweight and obesity in adulthood from body mass index values in childhood and adolescence. Am. J. Clin. Nutr.76, 653–658. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/76.3.653
13
HarrisonA. N.James BatemanC. C.Younger-ColemanN. O.WilliamsM. C.RockeK. D.Clato-Day ScarlettS. C.et al. (2020). Disordered eating behaviours and attitudes among adolescents in a middle-income country. Eat. Weight Disord.25, 1727–1737. doi: 10.1007/s40519-019-00814-5
14
HofstedeG. (2011). The Hofstede Centre: strategy, culture and change. doi: 10.9707/2307-0919.1014
15
JadonP. S.TripathiS. (2017). Effect of authoritarian parenting style on self esteem of the child: a systematic review. Int. J. Advance Res. Innovative Ideas Education3, 909–913. doi: 10.30650/jik.v7i1.244
16
JannahK.HastutiD.RianyY. E. (2022). Parenting style and depression among students: the mediating role of self-esteem. Psikohumaniora J. Penelit. Psikol.7, 39–50. doi: 10.21580/pjpp.v7i1.9885
17
JohnsG.TaylorB.JohnA.TanJ. (2019). Current eating disorder healthcare services–the perspectives and experiences of individuals with eating disorders, their families and health professionals: systematic review and thematic synthesis. BJPsych Open5:e59. doi: 10.1192/bjo.2019.48,
18
KleinD. A.SylvesterJ. E.SchveyN. A. (2021). Eating disorders in primary care: diagnosis and management. Am. Fam. Physician103, 22–32.
19
KolarD. R.RodriguezD. L.ChamsM. M.HoekH. W. (2016). Epidemiology of eating disorders in Latin America: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Curr. Opin. Psychol.29, 363–371. doi: 10.1097/YCO.0000000000000279
20
KrampeH.SalzA. L.KerperL. F.KrannichA.SchnellT.WerneckeK. D.et al. (2017). Readiness to change and therapy outcomes of an innovative psychotherapy program for surgical patients: results from a randomized controlled trial. BMC Psychiatry17:417. doi: 10.1186/s12888-017-1579-5,
21
KuczmarskiR. J.OgdenC. L.Grummer-StrawnL. M.FlegalK. M.GuoS. S.WeiR.et al. (2000). CDC growth charts: United States. Adv. Data314, 1–27.
22
LauJ. S.UongS. P.HartmanL.EatonA.SchmittdielJ. (2022). Incidence and medical hospitalization rates of patients with pediatric eating disorders. Perm. J.26, 56–61. doi: 10.7812/TPP/22.056,
23
LewisM. A. (2025). Practicing of coercive parenting style in an Inner-City Community in Central Village, Jamaica, and the impact on their children’s behaviour. Texila International Journal of Academic Research. doi: 10.21522/TIJAR.2014.12.03.Art007
24
LinJ. A.JheG.AdhikariR.VitaglianoJ. A.RoseK. L.FreizingerM.et al. (2023). Triggers for eating disorder onset in youth with anorexia nervosa across the weight spectrum. Eat. Disord.31, 553–572. doi: 10.1080/10640266.2023.2201988,
25
LippsG.LoweG. A.GibsonR. C.HallidayS.MorrisA.ClarkeN.et al. (2012). Parenting and depressive symptoms among adolescents in four Caribbean societies. Child Adolesc. Psychiatry Ment. Health6:31. doi: 10.1186/1753-2000-6-31,
26
MandalK.DasS.DattaK.ChowdhouryS. R.DattaS. (2021). Study to determine the relationship between parenting style and adolescent self-esteem. IP J. Paediatrics Nursing Sci.3, 112–117. doi: 10.18231/j.ijpns.2020.021
27
MorenoR.BuckelewS. M.AccursoE. C.Raymond-FleschM. (2023). Disparities in access to eating disorders treatment for publicly-insured youth and youth of color: a retrospective cohort study. J. Eat. Disord.11:10. doi: 10.1186/s40337-022-00730-7,
28
MorrisA.ElliottE.MaddenS. (2022). Early-onset eating disorders in Australian children: A national surveillance study showing increased incidence. Int. J. Eat. Disord.55, 1680–1687. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afac077
29
NazarB. P.GregorL. K.AlbanoG.MarchicaA.CocoG. L.CardiV.et al. (2017). Early response to treatment in eating disorders: a systematic review and a diagnostic test accuracy Meta-analysis. Eur. Eat. Disord. Rev.25, 67–79. doi: 10.1002/erv.2495,
30
NorcrossJ. C.LambertM. J. (2018). Psychotherapy relationships that work III. Psychotherapy55:303. doi: 10.1037/pst0000193,
31
PayneM. A. (1989). Use and abuse of corporal punishment: a Caribbean view. Child Abuse Negl.13, 389–401. doi: 10.1016/0145-2134(89)90079-3,
32
RikaniA. A.ChoudhryZ.ChoudhryA. M.IkramH.AsgharM. W.KajalD.et al. (2013). A critique of the literature on etiology of eating disorders. Ann. Neurosci.20, 157–161. doi: 10.5214/ans.0972.7531.200409,
33
RobinsonL.ZhangZ.JiaT.BobouM.RoachA.CampbellI.et al. (2020). Association of genetic and phenotypic assessments with onset of disordered eating behaviors and comorbid mental health problems among adolescents. JAMA Netw. Open3:e2026874. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.26874
34
SalaM.CollS.FlamerR. (2024). Gender stereotypes in eating disorder recognition. Eat. Weight Disord.29:45. doi: 10.1007/s40519-024-01672-6,
35
SalaM.Reyes-RodríguezM. L.BulikC. M.Bardone-ConeA. (2013). Race, ethnicity, and eating disorder recognition by peers. Eat. Disord.21, 423–436. doi: 10.1080/10640266.2013.827540,
36
SchmidtU. H.ClaudinoA.Fernández-ArandaF.GielK. E.GriffithsJ.HayP. J.et al. (2025). The current clinical approach to feeding and eating disorders aimed to increase personalization of management. World Psychiatry24, 4–31. doi: 10.1002/wps.21263,
37
SlaneJ. D.KlumpK. L.McGueM.IaconoW. G. (2014). Developmental trajectories of disordered eating from early adolescence to young adulthood: a longitudinal study. Int. J. Eat. Disord.47, 793–801. doi: 10.1002/eat.22329,
38
Stark-WroblewskiK.YanicoB. J.LupeS. (2005). Acculturation, internalization of Western appearance norms, and eating pathology among Japanese and Chinese international student women. Psychol. Women Q.29, 38–46. doi: 10.1111/j.1471%2D6402.2005.00166.x
39
TaylorJ. Y.CaldwellC. H.BaserR. E.FaisonN.JacksonJ. S. (2007). Prevalence of eating disorders among Blacks in the National Survey of American Life. Int. J. Eat. Disord.40, 10–14. doi: 10.1002/eat.20451
40
TreasureJ.SteinD.MaguireS. (2015). Has the time come for a staging model to map the course of eating disorders from high risk to severe enduring illness? An examination of the evidence. Early Interv. Psychiatry9, 173–184. doi: 10.1111/eip.12170,
41
UNICEF (2010). Child disciplinary practices at home: evidence from a range of low- and middle-income countries. New York (NY): UNICEF.
42
van HoekenD.HoekH. W. (2020). Review of the burden of eating disorders: mortality, disability, costs, quality of life, and family burden. Curr. Opin. Psychiatry33, 521–527. doi: 10.1097/YCO.0000000000000641,
43
WalkerdineV.OlsvoldA.RudbergM. (2013). Researching embodiment and intergenerational trauma using the work of Davoine and Gaudilliere: history walked in the door. Subjectivity.6, 272–297. doi: 10.1057/sub.2013.8
44
WhiteV.GardnerJ. M. (2002). Presence of anorexia nervosa and bulimia nervosa in Jamaica. West Indian Med. J.51, 32–34.,
45
YeboahA. B.ParkerJ. E.MatosL. M.WilsonP. A.TomiyamaA. J. (2024). The relationship between racial attitudes and disordered eating Behaviors in black men and black women. Int. J. Eat. Disord.57, 2402–2414. doi: 10.1002/eat.24290,
46
YoonC.MaiD.KinariwalaK.LedouxT.BettsR.JohnstonC. (2023). Sex and ethnic/racial differences in disordered eating behaviors and intuitive eating among college student. Front. Psychol.14:1221816. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1221816
Summary
Keywords
adolescents, young adults, eating disorders, Jamaica, management, outcomes
Citation
Harrison A, James C, Ferguson-Henry K, Rocke K and Lowe G (2026) Eating disorders among adolescents and young adults in Kingston, Jamaica. Front. Psychol. 17:1704895. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2026.1704895
Received
03 October 2025
Revised
09 January 2026
Accepted
19 January 2026
Published
23 February 2026
Volume
17 - 2026
Edited by
Atika Khalaf, Kristianstad University, Sweden
Reviewed by
Boonying Manaboriboon, Mahidol University, Thailand
Edson Júnior Silva Da Cruz, Federal University of Pará, Brazil
Lujain Nahas, Damascus University, Syria
Updates
Copyright
© 2026 Harrison, James, Ferguson-Henry, Rocke and Lowe.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Abigail Harrison, abigail.harrison@uwi.edu
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.