Abstract
Background:
University students face a substantial mental health burden. Although team sports such as basketball are recognized for their benefits, the symptom-level mechanisms linking depression, anxiety, and sleep disorders within this physically active population remain unclear.
Methods:
A cross-sectional study was conducted with 2,108 Chinese university students enrolled in basketball elective courses at Jilin University in Changchun province, China. Network analysis was applied to construct symptom networks of depression (PHQ-9), anxiety (GAD-7), and sleep problems (PSQI). Centrality metrics (strength, bridge strength) identified core symptoms and connectors between symptom clusters. Network stability was assessed via bootstrap procedures, and gender differences were examined using Network Comparison Tests. A sensitivity analysis was performed by reconstructing networks after excluding the PHQ3 to assess their influence on network structure.
Results:
Prevalence rates were 16.08% for anxiety, 19.83% for depression, and 23.34% for sleep problems. In the depression-anxiety network, uncontrollable worry (GAD2) and irritability (GAD6) emerged as core symptoms, while restlessness (GAD5) and irritability (GAD6) functioned as key bridge symptoms. In the tri-domain network incorporating sleep problems, daytime dysfunction (PSQI7) exhibited the highest centrality and bridge strength, linking sleep disturbances to emotional symptoms. Gender comparisons revealed no significant differences in network structure or global strength. The sensitivity analysis confirmed that the overall network topology and key bridge symptoms remained stable after excluding PHQ3.
Conclusion:
Depression, anxiety, and sleep problems form interconnected symptom networks in basketball elective students, with specific symptoms acting as critical nodes and bridges. Targeted interventions focusing on daytime dysfunction, irritability, and uncontrollable worry may disrupt symptom propagation and improve mental health outcomes in this population.
1 Introduction
Higher education students represent a high-risk population for mental health disorders (Auerbach et al., 2018). According to the World Mental Health International College Student (WMH-ICS) initiative, approximately 35.3% of students globally have screened positive for at least one common DSM-IV anxiety, mood, or substance use disorder in their lifetime, with 31.4% reporting symptoms in the past year (Auerbach et al., 2018). Meta-analyses reveal a substantial mental health burden among Chinese university students (Deng et al., 2021; Lin et al., 2018, Lin et al., 2025), with depression prevalence at 34.70% (Lin et al., 2025), anxiety disorders at 32% during the COVID-19 pandemic (Deng et al., 2021), and sleep disorders at 25.7% (Li et al., 2018). The GBD 2021 study further reveals a rising trend in the burden of depression and anxiety in China over the past 3 decades (Tian et al., 2021). These mental health issues not only impair academic performance and quality of life but are also associated with increased risks of suicidal ideation and related high-risk behaviors (Zhou et al., 2021).
The growing prevalence of mental health issues among university students worldwide has made this topic a key concern intersecting education, public health, and sports science. In recent years, physical activity is increasingly recognized as a potential strategy for promoting mental health (Huang et al., 2024; Smith and Merwin, 2021; Watson et al., 2017). Global initiatives, including the WHO's Global Action Plan on Physical Activity 2018–2030: More Activity, Better Health (World Health Organization, 2018) and the WHO Guidelines on Physical Activity and Sedentary Behavior (World Health Organization, 2020), emphasize the benefits of physical activity for mental health. Meta-analyses consistently support these findings, demonstrating that physical activity can alleviate symptoms of depression and anxiety (Heissel et al., 2023; Pearce et al., 2022; Recchia et al., 2023). Among various physical activities, team sports (such as basketball) demonstrate unique psychological and social benefits. Beyond enhancing physical endurance and supporting cardiovascular and musculoskeletal health, they foster social interaction and well being, thereby contributing to mental health (Castagna et al., 2018). A 12-week quasi-experimental study involving Chinese university students further confirmed that team sports can help reduce depressive symptoms and improve sleep quality (Johnston et al., 2021). Moreover, compared to individual exercise, team sports may promote greater physical and mental health benefits and encourage long-term adherence (Andersen et al., 2019). Basketball is a widely offered team sport in university physical education programs, distinguished by its competitive, interactive, and cooperative features. The course design typically incorporates structured activities, including skill drills, teamwork exercises, and competitive scenarios. Thus, students enrolled in these courses are simultaneously influenced by multiple psychosocial and physiological factors, such as physical exertion, social support, and performance pressure. This group not only experiences psychological stresses common to university students but also operates within a distinct environment shaped by sports pedagogy and team dynamics. Therefore, the presentation, mechanisms, and interactions of emotional and sleep problems in this population may differ from those in the general student body or among students who participate only in individual sports.
Multiple comparative studies have demonstrated that students who participate in team sports experience notable psychological health benefits. Relative to their non-athlete peers, college student-athletes exhibit significantly lower rates of anxiety, eating, mood, sleep, and other disorders (Edwards and Froehle, 2023). Longitudinal research further indicates a strong association between sustained involvement in team sports and reduced depression levels in early adulthood (Sabiston et al., 2016). Drawing on the “Conceptual Model of Health through Sport,” Caviedes et al. highlighted that, compared with general physical activity, team sports provide additional mental health advantages due to their distinct social characteristics (Eime et al., 2013). Mediation analyses confirm that social support plays a crucial role in the mechanism through which sports participation alleviates anxiety among university students, implying that the social bonds developed in team settings may indirectly lower anxiety (Liu and Shi, 2023). Although direct comparisons between basketball players and other student groups remain limited, the structured, cooperative, and goal-oriented nature of basketball suggests that its mental-health-promoting effects could be especially pronounced.
Although numerous studies have confirmed a positive association between physical exercise and mental health, systematic investigations into the specific effects of ball game elective courses among university students remain scarce. Particularly lacking are in-depth analyses of the internal structure of psychological symptoms and their interaction mechanisms. Furthermore, existing research predominantly employs traditional variable-centered statistical methods, such as regression analysis (Alnawwar et al., 2023; Rezaie et al., 2023) or structural equation modeling (Liu et al., 2023; Zhao et al., 2025). While these approaches can reveal overall variable-level trends, they are limited in capturing the dynamic interplay of symptoms within individuals. Additionally, most studies tend to treat depression, anxiety, and sleep disturbances as independent dimensions (Alnawwar et al., 2023; Liu et al., 2023; Rezaie et al., 2023; Zhao et al., 2025), overlooking their frequently co-occurring and mutually reinforcing nature in real-world contexts. This oversight constrains a comprehensive understanding of the complex mechanisms underlying the development of these mental disorders.
In recent years, the emergence of network psychometrics has provided a new research path for understanding mental health disorders (Borsboom, 2017). A growing body of research suggests that depression, anxiety, and sleep disturbances do not occur in isolation. Instead, they form a cluster of mutually reinforcing symptoms, interconnected through key clinical features that create bidirectional loops and cascading pathways (Borsboom, 2017; Epskamp et al., 2018; Jones et al., 2021). In college student populations, multiple studies have found that symptoms such as uncontrollable worry, restlessness, and irritability in the anxiety dimension, fatigue, and loss of interest in the depression dimension, as well as poor sleep quality and daytime dysfunction in the sleep dimension, often occupy central positions in the network or serve as bridges across communities (Bai et al., 2021; Li et al., 2024; Tao et al., 2022). Moreover, network structure and key bridge symptoms may vary across subgroups based on stress levels or gender, underscoring the need for precise, and context-specific interventions (Li et al., 2024; Tao et al., 2022).
Therefore, this study employs network analysis to construct symptom networks for depression, anxiety, and sleep quality among Chinese university students enrolled in basketball elective courses at Jilin University in Changchun province, to provide actionable evidence for integrated psychological and physical intervention strategies in higher education.
2 Materials and methods
2.1 Study design
2.1.1 Participants and procedures
This study ultimately included a sample of 2,108 participants from Jilin University in Changchun province, China. Employing a cross-sectional design, the research was conducted at Jilin University from September to October 2023 using cluster-stratified convenience sampling. The study population comprised all students enrolled in the university's basketball elective classes (total N = 2,568). The specific steps were as follows: Firstly, all basketball elective classes published by the Public Sports Department of Jilin University were designated as primary sampling units (clusters). Classes were included in their entirety to avoid splitting participants across classes and minimize disruption to physical education teaching. The stratification factor was year level (1st-year/2nd-year) to account for differences in academic pressure. With prior informed consent from instructors, electronic questionnaire QR codes were distributed during the 2nd week of classes and collected immediately, ensuring a response rate exceeding 95%. Absentees or refusals were recorded as “non-respondents” without replacement sampling, adhering to ethical and teaching arrangements. Data collection utilized an electronic questionnaire covering depression (PHQ-9), anxiety (GAD-7), sleep quality (Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index, PSQI), and demographic information. Distribution via classroom sessions ensured high response rates and data quality. The sample size was determined through network power simulation analysis (Epskamp and Fried, 2018; Supplementary Figure S1), where the estimated correlation coefficient for intensity centrality decayed ≤ 0.05 when n ≥ 1,800, hence a target sample of 2,000 participants was set. A total of 2,245 responses were ultimately collected. After excluding systematic responses and those with >20% missing data, 2,108 valid samples remained, meeting the stability criterion of CS coefficient ≥0.75.
This research protocol has been approved by the Ethics Review Committee of Jilin University. All participants read and signed an electronic informed consent form prior to completing the questionnaire, and were informed of the voluntary and anonymous nature of their participation.
2.2 Measurements
This study employed the following measurement instruments to assess participants' symptoms of depression, anxiety, and sleep problems. Supplementary Table S1 provides detailed descriptions of the subscale items for each instrument.
2.2.1 Anxiety symptoms
Anxiety symptoms are evaluated using the Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7-Item Scale (GAD-7; Spitzer et al., 2006). The GAD-7 consists of seven items measuring anxiety symptoms over the previous 2 weeks. Each item is rated on a scale from 0 to 3, where 0 represents “not at all” and 3 represents “nearly every day.” Higher total scores indicate greater anxiety severity. The GAD-7 has demonstrated strong reliability and validity in previous studies, with a Cronbach's alpha of 0.92 indicating excellent internal consistency (Spitzer et al., 2006). Anxiety levels were classified based on GAD-7 total scores: 0–4 = minimal, 5–9 = mild, 10–14 = moderate, and 15–21 = severe (Spitzer et al., 2006). A GAD-7 score of 10 or higher is considered clinically significant (Löwe et al., 2008).
2.2.2 Depression symptoms
Depressive symptoms are assessed using the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9; Spitzer et al., 1999). The PHQ-9 is a widely validated self-report instrument comprising nine items that evaluate depressive symptom severity over the preceding 2 weeks. Each item is scored from 0 to 3, with higher total scores reflecting more severe depression. The PHQ-9 exhibits strong psychometric properties, including a Cronbach's alpha of 0.851 (Maroufizadeh et al., 2019), which indicates good internal consistency. The PHQ-9 has been extensively validated within Chinese populations, establishing it as a reliable instrument for assessing depressive symptoms (Wang et al., 2014). Depression severity was classified according to PHQ-9 scores as follows: 1–4 = minimal, 5–9 = mild, 10–14 = moderate, 15–19 = moderately severe, and 20–27 = severe (Maurer et al., 2018). Accordingly, a cutoff score of 10 was applied to define the presence of depressive symptoms (Kroenke et al., 2001).
2.2.3 Sleep problems
Sleep problems are measured using the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI; Buysse and Reynolds, 1989). The PSQI includes 18 items that assess seven sleep domains over the past month. Each domain is scored from 0 to 3, with higher scores representing poorer sleep quality. The PSQI has shown excellent reliability and validity, with a Cronbach's alpha of 0.83, indicating good internal consistency (Buysse and Reynolds, 1989). We defined a PSQI score greater than 7 as indicative of sleep disorders (Buysse et al., 1989).
2.3 Statistical analysis
All statistical analyses were performed using R-Studio (version 4.3.2). Descriptive statistics summarized the demographic characteristics and scale scores. Categorical variables are presented as frequencies and percentages (n, %), and continuous variables as means with standard deviations (SD). We subsequently constructed comorbidity networks for depression, anxiety. Network analysis elucidates the bivariate relationships among multiple variables, revealing the structural and functional characteristics of complex psychopathological systems—such as core components, co-occurrence patterns, and pivotal nodes—which are often not fully captured by traditional regression or latent variable models (McNally, 2021). Prior to network construction, potential item redundancy was assessed using the “goldbricker” function from the “networktools” R package. The “goldbricker” function identifies potentially redundant node pairs by assessing the correlation profiles between each candidate pair and all other nodes in the network. If two nodes exhibit similar correlations with all other nodes (i.e., statistically significant differences in correlations are observed in less than 25% of cases), they are considered redundant nodes (Hittner et al., 2003). The robustness of the network was confirmed through stability analysis. The significance threshold for all tests was set at P < 0.05.
2.3.1 Network construction
Network analysis was conducted to elucidate the complex interrelationships among depression, anxiety, and sleep problems, and to identify core and bridge symptoms within this network. The network structure was estimated using a Graphical Gaussian Model (GGM; Epskamp et al., 2018). To limit spurious connections and obtain a sparse network, the Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (LASSO) regularization was applied. Model selection was governed by minimizing the Extended Bayesian Information Criterion (EBIC; Friedman et al., 2008). This approach shrinks trivial edge weights to zero, thereby simplifying the network structure. In this model, the gamma hyperparameter was set to a default value of 0.5 (Epskamp and Fried, 2018). To identify unique direct associations between syndemic indicators, we utilized partial polychoric correlations (Borsboom and Cramer, 2013). By statistically accounting for the influence of all other network nodes, this method isolates the specific relationship between any given pair of variables, eliminating spurious connections (Borsboom and Cramer, 2013).
The network structure was estimated using the R package “qgraph” (Epskamp et al., 2012). Each node represents a symptom, and edges represent partial correlations between pairs of symptoms. Solid blue edges depict positive associations, while dashed red edges indicate negative associations; the thickness of an edge corresponds to the strength of the relationship (Epskamp et al., 2012).
2.3.2 Centrality measures
Node strength centrality and bridge strength centrality were computed to quantify the importance and connectivity of each node within the network (Opsahl et al., 2010). Strength centrality represents the absolute sum of a node's direct connections, reflecting its overall connectivity. Bridge strength centrality specifically measures a node's capacity to connect different symptom clusters or communities (Jones et al., 2021).
2.3.3 Network stability and accuracy
The stability and accuracy of the estimated network were evaluated using the R package “bootnet” (Epskamp et al., 2018). The correlation stability coefficient (CS-C) and 95% bootstrap confidence intervals (CIs) were computed to assess the robustness of the network structure and the precision of edge weight estimates. A non-parametric bootstrap procedure was used to examine the stability of edge weights; narrower 95% CIs indicate greater estimation precision. Typically, a CS-C value above 0.25 is generally considered acceptable, while a value exceeding 0.50 indicates good stability (Epskamp et al., 2018).
2.3.4 Network comparison
Network Comparison Tests (NCT) were performed to examine potential differences in network structure between gender subgroups. These tests evaluated overall network structure (invariance), global strength (the sum of absolute edge weights), and specific edge weights. Permutation-based tests (1,000 permutations) were employed to statistically assess differences in global strength and network structure (i.e., the distribution of edge weights) between the subgroups (van Borkulo et al., 2023).
2.3.5 Sensitivity analysis
To evaluate the potential influence of the PHQ3 items (Sleep Dysregulation) on symptom network analysis, we performed a sensitivity analysis. Specifically, after removing the PHQ3, we reconstructed the networks for depression (PHQ-9), anxiety (GAD-7), and sleep problems (PSQI). The overall network structure was then compared before and after the exclusion of PHQ3.
3 Results
3.1 Participant characteristics
The baseline and demographic characteristics of the participants are presented in Table 1. The study included 2,108 college students enrolled in a basketball elective course, with a mean age of 19.18 years (SD = 1.09). The sample comprised 1,359 males (64.47%) and 749 females (35.53%). Psychometric assessments revealed mean scores of 5.71 (SD = 4.25) on the GAD-7 and 5.64 (SD = 7.06) on the PHQ-9. Based on established cutoffs, 16.08% (n = 339) of participants exhibited anxiety symptoms, while 19.83% (n = 418) displayed depressive symptoms. The mean PSQI score was 5.11 (SD = 3.67), with 23.34% (n = 492) experiencing sleep problems. Supplementary Table S2 details the distribution, network centrality, and predictability of nodes for the GAD-7, PHQ-9, and PSQI items.
Table 1
| Variables | Mean/N | SD/% |
|---|---|---|
| Age (year) | 19.18 | 1.09 |
| Height (m) | 1.75 | 0.10 |
| Weight (kg) | 71.05 | 17.29 |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 23.18 | 4.89 |
| Gender | ||
| Male | 1,359 | 64.47% |
| Female | 749 | 35.53% |
| Residence | ||
| Urban | 805 | 38.19% |
| Rural | 1,303 | 61.81% |
| Family sibling status | ||
| Only child | 1,093 | 51.85% |
| Non-only child | 1,015 | 48.15% |
| Speciality | ||
| Humanities and social sciences | 788 | 37.38% |
| Science and engineering | 1,203 | 57.07% |
| Arts | 117 | 5.55% |
| Smoking | ||
| Rarely or never | 1,602 | 76.00% |
| Occasionally | 212 | 10.06% |
| Frequently or almost every day | 294 | 13.95% |
| E-cigarette use | ||
| Rarely or never | 1,935 | 91.79% |
| Occasionally | 110 | 5.22% |
| Frequently or almost every day | 63 | 2.99% |
| Alcohol consumption | ||
| Rarely or never | 1,663 | 78.89% |
| Occasionally | 363 | 17.22% |
| Frequently or almost every day | 82 | 3.89% |
| Coffee consumption | ||
| Rarely or never | 1,328 | 63.00% |
| Occasionally | 612 | 29.03% |
| Frequently or almost every day | 168 | 7.97% |
| Tea consumption | ||
| Rarely or never | 1,277 | 60.58% |
| Occasionally | 667 | 31.64% |
| Frequently or almost every day | 164 | 7.78% |
| Short video software viewing time | ||
| Low usage duration: < 1 h | 867 | 41.13% |
| Medium usage duration: 1–4 h | 858 | 40.70% |
| High usage duration:>4 h | 383 | 18.17% |
| GAD-7 | 5.71 | 4.25 |
| Anxiety | ||
| No anxiety (0–9) | 1,769 | 83.92% |
| With anxiety (10–21) | 339 | 16.08% |
| PHQ-9 | 5.64 | 7.06 |
| Depression | ||
| No depression (0–9) | 1,690 | 80.17% |
| With depression (10–27) | 418 | 19.83% |
| Pittsburgh sleep quality index (PSQI) | 5.11 | 3.67 |
| Sleep problem | ||
| Normal sleep (0–7) | 1,616 | 76.66% |
| Have sleep problems (8–21) | 492 | 23.34% |
Baseline and demographic characteristics of the study sample (n = 2,108).
3.2 Networks of depressive and anxiety symptoms
Figure 1 depicts the overall network structure of depressive and anxiety symptoms among college students enrolled in basketball courses. The network comprised 82 non-zero edges out of a possible 120, with a density of 0.683 and an average edge weight of 0.065. Strength centrality analysis (Supplementary Figure 2A) identified GAD2 (Uncontrollable Worry), GAD6 (Irritability), and PHQ8 (Psychomotor Retardation/Agitation) as the most central nodes, underscoring their pivotal roles in the depressive-anxiety network. Following LASSO regularized estimation and bridge strength ranking, three anxiety items—GAD5 (Restlessness), GAD6 (Irritability), and GAD7 (Feeling Afraid)—were highlighted in green due to their pronounced cross-cluster connectivity (Figure 2) and high bridge strength centrality (all z-values >0.75; Supplementary Figure 2B), confirming their key role in linking anxiety and depression comorbidity. Their direct coupling with core depressive symptoms (PHQ8, PHQ9) significantly reduced the geodesic distance between communities. Among these, GAD5 ranked first in bridging strength (Supplementary Figure 2B) and exhibited strong correlations with both PHQ8 (Psychomotor Retardation/Agitation) and PHQ9 (Suicidal Ideation). This indicates that “Restlessness” (GAD5) serves as the pivotal symptom node linking the two major symptom clusters of anxiety and depression within this network. GAD6 (Irritability) demonstrated strong performance in both centrality measures, preliminarily validating its role as a pivotal bridging node in the depression → anxiety pathway. Systematic stability and diagnostic accuracy analyses confirmed the numerical robustness of depression-anxiety network (Supplementary Figure 3).
Figure 1
Figure 2
3.3 Networks of depressive, anxiety, and sleep problem symptoms
Figure 3 depicts the symptom network of depression (PHQ-9), anxiety (GAD-7), and sleep problems (PSQI) among college students enrolled in a basketball course. Of the 253 potential edges, 162 demonstrated significant associations, resulting in a network density of 0.640 and a mean edge weight of 0.041. Among all the edges, the strongest edge was observed between PSQI4 (sleep efficiency) and PSQI3 (sleep duration) (r = 0.31), followed by the edge between PHQ8 (psychomotor retardation/agitation) and PHQ9 (suicidal ideation; r = 0.31; Supplementary Table S3). Furthermore, the standardized strength centrality (z-score) analysis (Supplementary Figure 4, Table S4) identified PSQI7 (daytime dysfunction) and PSQI1 (sleep quality) as the most central symptoms within the entire network, indicating their paramount influence on the co-occurrence of sleep, anxiety, and depression symptoms after controlling for all other nodes. Subsequent bridge strength analysis (Supplementary Figure 5, Table S4) revealed that PSQI7 also exhibited the highest bridge strength, confirming its role as a primary connector across different symptom communities. According to the centrality plot of three-symptom network (Supplementary Figure 6A), PHQ4 (Fatigue), PHQ9 (Suicidal Ideation), and PSQI7 (Daytime Dysfunction) displayed the highest centrality, identifying them as the most influential comorbid symptoms. Collectively, these findings demonstrate that daytime dysfunction serves as the key node through which sleep problems exert spillover effects on emotion symptoms.
Figure 3
Figure 4 illustrates the bridging symptoms and their associative patterns within the tri-domain symptom network of depression, anxiety, and sleep problems among university students enrolled in basketball courses. Within this network, yellow nodes denote bridging symptoms: GAD5 (Restlessness), representing an anxiety symptom, exhibits a negative correlation with PSQI7 (Daytime Dysfunction) within the sleep problems domain and a positive correlation with PHQ9 (Suicidal Ideation) within the depression domain. PHQ9 (Suicidal Ideation) exhibits a strong negative correlation with PSQI7 (Daytime Dysfunction). PSQI5 (Sleep Disturbance) and PSQI7 (Daytime Dysfunction), as core sleep disorder symptoms, demonstrate multiple associations with both anxiety, and depressive symptoms. Similarly, the bridge strength centrality diagram indicates that PSQI7 (Daytime Dysfunction), PHQ9 (Suicidal Ideation), and PHQ3 (Sleep Dysregulation) exhibit high bridge strength centrality, playing a pivotal role in connecting distinct symptom clusters (Supplementary Figure 6B).
Figure 4
The stability and accuracy of the three-symptom network are presented in Supplementary Figure 7. Bootstrap difference tests (2,000 samples) revealed that most node centrality differences were not statistically significant (Supplementary Figures 7A, B). Case-dropping bootstrap analysis demonstrated that the correlations for both node strength and bridge strength remained high (CS ≥ 0.50) as the subset proportion decreased, indicating robust network stability (Supplementary Figure 7C). Additionally, the narrower 95% confidence intervals of the bootstrap results of edge weights in the network, shown in Supplementary Figure 7D, confirm the precision and replicability of the major edge weight estimates in the network.
3.4 Network comparison by gender
The network comparison test between genders in the college student basketball course revealed no significant differences in global network strength (Figure 5C: 10.94 for males vs. 10.78 for females; P = 0.662). Similarly, no significant difference in network structure was observed (Figure 5D: M = 0.217, P = 0.160). Furthermore, the permutation test of edge weights showed that all P-values remained non-significant after Bonferroni-Holm correction (all P > 0.05), which means stable network structure.
Figure 5
3.5 Sensitivity analysis
In the sensitivity analysis, the network structure and symptom relationships were examined after the removal of the PHQ3 (Sleep Dysregulation). Following its exclusion, the network retained 22 nodes and 154 non-zero edges, with an average edge weight of 0.0431, indicating generally weak pairwise symptom associations. Although the connection between sleep-related and emotional symptoms weakened, the overall network stability, and primary findings remained largely unchanged (Figure 6). Notably, PHQ3 had previously functioned as a key bridge symptom linking sleep disturbances with emotional symptoms. After its removal, PHQ4 (fatigue) assumed this bridging role, connecting emotional symptoms to sleep problems—particularly between daytime dysfunction and depressive symptoms (Figure 7). Thus, while excluding PHQ3 weakened direct sleep–emotion linkages, PHQ4 compensated by maintaining network connectivity, underscoring the intermediary function of fatigue in the emotion–sleep relationship.
Figure 6
Figure 7
4 Discussion
This study conducted a cross-sectional survey among Chinese college students enrolled in basketball courses. Through network analysis, a comprehensive network of depressive symptoms, anxiety symptoms, and sleep problems was constructed to identify and evaluate core symptoms and possible interactions among common psychological issues within the context of physical activity. The study revealed that the participating college students generally exhibited psychological problems, with 16.08% presenting anxiety symptoms, 19.83% experiencing depressive symptoms, and 23.34% suffering from sleep disorders, consistent with existing epidemiological survey results (Conteh et al., 2022; Deng et al., 2021; Lin et al., 2025).
The network analysis results for depressive-anxiety symptoms indicated that GAD2 (uncontrollable worry) possessed the highest intensity centrality, followed by GAD6 (irritability) and PHQ8 (psychomotor retardation/agitation), positioning them as key drivers in maintaining or exacerbating the depressive and anxious cycle. These findings align with existing evidence (Milgram and Timpano, 2024) and have also been observed in other populations, such as the elderly and patients with chronic diseases (Zhang et al., 2024; Chen et al., 2023). Uncontrollable worry, a core symptom of generalized anxiety disorder, is defined as excessive and persistent worry that is often disproportionate to actual circumstances. Chinese college students commonly face intense academic competition and future employment pressure, which can readily lead to excessive worry. Limited mental health resources may impede college students' access to timely and effective help, causing worry to accumulate over time and develop into an uncontrollable state. Unhealthy lifestyle behaviors, such as dependence on electronic devices, may also impair college students' capacity to cope with stress. Bridge symptoms, which connect two distinct psychological symptom clusters, can facilitate the development of comorbid psychological symptoms. GAD5 (restlessness), GAD6 (irritability), and GAD7 (fear) were identified as key bridge symptoms with high connectivity strength, serving as critical links between anxiety and depression. GAD6 (irritability) notably demonstrated both high centralization and bridge strength, strongly suggesting its role as a core node in the depression-anxiety pathway. Irritability not only impairs social functioning but may also trigger interpersonal conflicts, thereby exacerbating negative emotional cycles. However, some studies suggest that while irritability signifies psychological disorders in children and adolescents, it does not function as a bridge symptom in adults (Groen et al., 2020). This discrepancy may be attributed to varying manifestations and self-perceptions of the same symptom across different developmental stages.
In the tri-domain symptom network of depression-anxiety-sleep disorders constructed in this study, daytime dysfunction was identified as the most significant symptom through which sleep issues influence anxiety and depressive moods. PSQI7 (daytime dysfunction) exhibited the highest standardized intensity centrality and bridging strength, demonstrating strong negative correlations with GAD5 (restlessness) and PHQ9 (suicidal ideation). This indicates that the severity of daytime dysfunction caused by poor sleep quality (manifested as daytime drowsiness, attention deficits, impaired cognitive function, and mood disturbances) correlates with the severity of an individual's pathological state. In such cases, reduced energy and decreased activity may mask internal restlessness and elevate suicidal ideation risks (Sateia, 2014). Studies have shown that sleep disorders and depression are independently associated with increased suicidal behaviors (Becker et al., 2018), and in this study, PHQ9 (suicidal ideation) also exhibited high intensity centrality and bridging strength. Additionally, PSQI4 (sleep efficiency) and PSQI3 (sleep duration) demonstrated the highest edge strength, suggesting their potential as prioritized intervention targets. These highly correlated local symptoms could provide immediate synergistic benefits while concurrently reducing the activation of other symptom nodes. From a neurobiological perspective, sleep and emotion exhibit a bidirectional coupling relationship. Experimental studies have shown that sleep deprivation impairs top-down regulation between the prefrontal cortex and the amygdala, increasing an individual's sensitivity to negative emotions. Furthermore, chronic sleep disruption is associated with impaired emotion regulation, contributing to the development or persistence of anxiety and depression (Ben Simon et al., 2020; Goldstein and Walker, 2014; Verweij et al., 2014).
In university management, identifying high centralization symptoms may facilitate the early detection of individuals requiring psychological intervention. For instance, those exhibiting prominent GAD2 (uncontrollable worry), GAD6 (irritability), PHQ8 (psychomotor retardation/agitation), PSQI7 (daytime dysfunction), and PSQI1 (sleep quality) symptoms should be closely monitored for potential comorbidities of depression, anxiety, or sleep disorders. Based on network psychology theory, interventions specifically targeting bridging symptoms could weaken the overall strength of psychological networks while blocking cross-symptom and cross-diagnosis transmission pathways—especially when these bridging symptoms also serve as core symptoms. Therefore, GAD6 (irritability) and PSQI7 (daytime dysfunction) should be prioritized in psychological network interventions for college students. The emotional regulation effects of physical exercise are dual: while it reduces anxiety and depression levels and improves sleep quality, high-intensity physical activity may overstimulate the sympathetic nervous system, elevating stress hormones like adrenaline and noradrenaline. This physiological arousal correlates with anxiety states. This study, involving participants in basketball elective courses, revealed that even students with moderate exercise levels still exhibited significant psychological issues. Based on comprehensive network analysis, universities should consider appropriately introducing cognitive behavioral therapy, relaxation therapy, and other interventions to improve college students' nighttime sleep quality and daytime functional impairments while further enhancing their stress management and emotional regulation capabilities (Tadros et al., 2023). The gender comparison test results in this study indicate no significant differences in global network strength or structural differences between genders, which aligns with findings from adolescents, the elderly, and others research (Cai et al., 2022; Fang et al., 2025; Wu and Cai, 2024). This suggests that universities may not need to establish separate intervention programs for different genders.
This study constructed a depression-anxiety-sleep symptom network for Chinese college students through a large-sample survey and enhanced the stability and reliability of the network analysis results using bootstrap tests. The study collected scale information from three different psychological symptom domains to avoid information loss in comorbidity symptoms. To the best of our knowledge, this study is the first to apply network psychometric methods to university students enrolled in a basketball elective, offering novel evidence on the comorbid mechanisms linking depression, anxiety, and sleep disturbances within this physically active population. The findings support several actionable recommendations for university mental health practice. At the intervention level, strategies should prioritize key symptomatic nodes, such as irritability and daytime dysfunction, to disrupt pathways of symptom propagation and promote integrated protocols combining sleep management, emotion regulation, and cognitive-behavioral skills. At the prevention level, these bridging symptoms could be incorporated into early-warning indicators and routine screening systems. Finally, at the curriculum level, stress-management and emotion-regulation training could be embedded into sports electives like basketball, leveraging the synergistic benefits of physical activity and psychological well being.
However, this study still possesses the following limitations. First, while the participants were college students enrolled in basketball elective courses, the study did not account for factors such as exercise frequency, intensity, and duration that influence psychological and sleep patterns. Furthermore, the absence of a control group of students without physical exercise should be addressed in future research. Second, this specific sampling introduces potential selection bias regarding physical activity and motivation, potentially limiting generalizability to the broader student population. Future research should validate these findings in more diverse samples. Third, we acknowledge a potential topological overlap between the sleep item of the PHQ-9 (Item 3) and the PSQI components, as both assess sleep disturbances. While this could theoretically inflate specific edge weights due to semantic redundancy, we chose to retain PHQ-3 to preserve the psychometric integrity of the depression construct and to explicitly model the bridging role of sleep symptoms between the two disorders. Future studies could benefit from applying specific statistical controls or checking network stability when removing overlapping items. Fourthly, the cross-sectional design precludes causal inference; longitudinal data are required to determine directional relationships. Lastly, the use of subjective self-report scales may introduce bias due to participants' potential overestimation or underestimation of symptoms. Finally, as a single-center study, the generalizability of the findings requires further validation considering complex geographical and social environmental factors.
5 Conclusion
Based on network analysis of depressive, anxiety, and sleep-related symptoms among Chinese college students enrolled in basketball elective courses, this study identifies uncontrollable worry (GAD2), irritability (GAD6), psychomotor agitation/retardation (PHQ8), and daytime dysfunction (PSQI7) as core and bridge symptoms in the comorbid symptom network. These findings underscore the potential utility of interventions that specifically target such pivotal symptom nodes, offering a theoretical foundation and practical direction for improving mental health within this student population. Given the inherent limitations of cross-sectional designs in establishing causality, future research should incorporate longitudinal approaches to investigate the dynamic evolution of these symptom networks and to evaluate the efficacy of targeted interventions. Such work will be essential for developing more effective strategies to promote mental health among university students.
Statements
Data availability statement
The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article will be made available by the authors, without undue reservation.
Ethics statement
The studies involving humans were approved by the Ethics Committee of Jilin University. The studies were conducted in accordance with the local legislation and institutional requirements. Written informed consent for participation was not required from the participants or the participants' legal guardians/next of kin in accordance with the national legislation and institutional requirements.
Author contributions
XWu: Validation, Methodology, Conceptualization, Software, Writing – original draft, Formal analysis. XWa: Investigation, Supervision, Resources, Visualization, Conceptualization, Writing – review & editing, Project administration, Data curation.
Funding
The author(s) declared that financial support was not received for this work and/or its publication.
Conflict of interest
The author(s) declared that this work was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Generative AI statement
The author(s) declared that generative AI was not used in the creation of this manuscript.
Any alternative text (alt text) provided alongside figures in this article has been generated by Frontiers with the support of artificial intelligence and reasonable efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, including review by the authors wherever possible. If you identify any issues, please contact us.
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Supplementary material
The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2026.1738600/full#supplementary-material
References
1
AlnawwarM. A.AlraddadiM. I.AlgethmiR. A.SalemG. A.SalemM. A.AlharbiA. A.et al. (2023). The effect of physical activity on sleep quality and sleep disorder: a systematic review. Cureus.15:e43595. doi: 10.7759/cureus.43595
2
AndersenM. H.OttesenL.ThingL. F. (2019). The social and psychological health outcomes of team sport participation in adults: an integrative review of research. Scand. J. Public Health.47, 832–150. doi: 10.1177/1403494818791405
3
AuerbachR. P.MortierP.BruffaertsR.AlonsoJ.BenjetC.CuijpersP.et al. (2018). WHO world mental health surveys international college student project: prevalence and distribution of mental disorders. J. Abnorm. Psychol.127, 623–638. doi: 10.1037/abn0000362
4
BaiW.XiHTZhuQ.JiM.ZhangH.YangB. X.et al. (2021). Network analysis of anxiety and depressive symptoms among nursing students during the COVID-19 pandemic. J. Affect. Disord.294, 753–760. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2021.07.072
5
BeckerS. P.DvorskyM. R.HoldawayA. S.LuebbeA. M. (2018). Sleep problems and suicidal behaviors in college students. J. Psychiatr. Res.99, 122–128. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2018.01.009
6
Ben SimonE.VallatR.BarnesC. M.WalkerM. P. (2020). Sleep loss and the socio-emotional brain. Trends Cogn. Sci.24, 435–450. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2020.02.003
7
BorsboomD. (2017). A. network theory of mental disorders. World Psychiatr. Off. J. World Psychiatr. Assoc. (WPA). 16, 5–13. doi: 10.1002/wps.20375
8
BorsboomD.CramerA. O. (2013). Network analysis: an integrative approach to the structure of psychopathology. Annu. Rev. Clin. Psychol.9, 91–121. doi: 10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-050212-185608
9
BuysseD. J.ReynoldsC. F.MonkT. H.BermanS. R.KupferD. J. (1989). The Pittsburgh sleep quality index: a new instrument for psychiatric practice and research. Psychiatr. Res.28, 193–213. doi: 10.1016/0165-1781(89)90047-4
10
CaiH.BaiW.LiuH.ChenX.QiH.LiuR.et al. (2022). Network analysis of depressive and anxiety symptoms in adolescents during the later stage of the COVID-19 pandemic. Transl. Psychiatr.12:98. doi: 10.1038/s41398-022-01838-9
11
CastagnaC.de SousaM.KrustrupP.KirkendallD. T. (2018). Recreational team sports: The motivational medicine. J. Sport Health Sci.7, 129–31. doi: 10.1016/j.jshs.2017.12.001
12
ChenX.RenL.XueX.YuN.LiuP.ShenW.et al. (2023). The comorbidity of depression and anxiety symptoms in tinnitus sufferers: a network analysis. Brain Sci. 13:583. doi: 10.3390/brainsci13040583
13
ContehI.YanJ.DoviK. S.BajinkaO.MasseyI. Y.TurayB.et al. (2022). Prevalence and associated influential factors of mental health problems among Chinese college students during different stages of COVID-19 pandemic: a systematic review. Psychiatr. Res. Comm.2:100082. doi: 10.1016/j.psycom.2022.100082
14
DengJ.ZhouF.HouW.SilverZ.WongC. Y.ChangO.et al. (2021). The prevalence of depressive symptoms, anxiety symptoms and sleep disturbance in higher education students during the COVID-19 pandemic: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Psychiatr. Res.301:113863. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2021.113863
15
EdwardsB.FroehleA. (2023). Examining the incidence of reporting mental health diagnosis between college student athletes and non-athlete students and the impact on academic performance. J. Am. Coll. Health: J ACH.71, 69–75. doi: 10.1080/07448481.2021.1874387
16
EimeR. M.YoungJ. A.HarveyJ. T.CharityM. J.PayneW. R. (2013). A. systematic review of the psychological and social benefits of participation in sport for children and adolescents: informing development of a conceptual model of health through sport. Int. J. Behav. Nutr. Phys. Act.10:98. doi: 10.1186/1479-5868-10-98
17
EpskampS.BorsboomD.FriedE. I. (2018). Estimating psychological networks and their accuracy: a tutorial paper. Behav. Res. Methods.50, 195–212. doi: 10.3758/s13428-017-0862-1
18
EpskampS.CramerA. O. J.WaldorpL. J.SchmittmannV. D.BorsboomD. (2012). qgraph: network visualizations of relationships in psychometric data. J. Stat. Software. 48, 1–18. doi: 10.18637/jss.v048.i04
19
EpskampS.FriedE. I. (2018). A tutorial on regularized partial correlation networks. Psychol. Methods.23, 617–34. doi: 10.1037/met0000167
20
FangJ.TangH.LiaoH.ZhongY.LiY.LiaoY.et al. (2025). Network analysis of anxiety, insomnia, depression, and suicide attempts in Chinese outpatients with somatic symptom disorder. Neuropsychiatr. Dis. Treat.21, 1091–1105. doi: 10.2147/NDT.S512848
21
FriedmanJ.HastieT.TibshiraniR. (2008). Sparse inverse covariance estimation with the graphical lasso. Biostat. (Oxford, England).9, 432–441. doi: 10.1093/biostatistics/kxm045
22
GoldsteinA. N.WalkerM. P. (2014). The role of sleep in emotional brain function. Annu. Rev. Clin. Psychol.10, 679–708. doi: 10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-032813-153716
23
GroenR. N.RyanO.WigmanJ. T. W.RieseH.PenninxB.GiltayE. J.et al. (2020). Comorbidity between depression and anxiety: assessing the role of bridge mental states in dynamic psychological networks. BMC Med.18:308. doi: 10.1186/s12916-020-01738-z
24
HeisselA.HeinenD.BrokmeierL. L.SkarabisN.KangasM.VancampfortD.et al. (2023). Exercise as medicine for depressive symptoms? A systematic review and meta-analysis with meta-regression. Brit. J. Sports Med.57, 1049–1057. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2022-106282
25
HittnerJ. B.MayK.SilverN. C.Monte CarloA. (2003). evaluation of tests for comparing dependent correlations. J. Gen. Psychol.130, 149–168. doi: 10.1080/00221300309601282
26
HuangK.BeckmanE. M.NgN.DingleG. A.HanR.JamesK.et al. (2024). Effectiveness of physical activity interventions on undergraduate students' mental health: systematic review and meta-analysis. Health Prom. Int. 39:daae054. doi: 10.1093/heapro/daae054
27
JohnstonS. A.RoskowskiC.HeZ.KongL.ChenW. (2021). Effects of team sports on anxiety, depression, perceived stress, and sleep quality in college students. J. Am. Coll. Health: J. ACH.69, 791–797. doi: 10.1080/07448481.2019.1707836
28
JonesP. J.MaR.McNallyR. J. (2021). Bridge centrality: a network approach to understanding comorbidity. Multivariate Behav. Res.56, 353–367. doi: 10.1080/00273171.2019.1614898
29
KroenkeK.SpitzerR. L.WilliamsJ. B. (2001). The PHQ-9: validity of a brief depression severity measure. J. Gen. Intern. Med.16, 606–613. doi: 10.1046/j.1525-1497.2001.016009606.x
30
LiL.WangY. Y.WangS. B.ZhangL.LiL.XuD. D.et al. (2018). Prevalence of sleep disturbances in Chinese university students: a comprehensive meta-analysis. J. Sleep Res.27:e12648. doi: 10.1111/jsr.12648
31
LiW.HuoS.YinF.WuZ.ZhangX.WangZ.et al. (2024). The differences in symptom networks of depression, anxiety, and sleep in college students with different stress levels. BMC Public Health.24:3609. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-21161-w
32
LinZ. Z.CaiH. W.HuangY. F.ZhouL. L.YuanZ. Y.HeL. P.et al. (2025). Prevalence of depression among university students in China: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Psychol.13:373. doi: 10.1186/s40359-025-02688-y
33
LiuM.ShiB. (2023). The effect of physical exercise on the anxiety of college students in the post-pandemic era: the mediating role of social support and proactive personality. Front. Psychol.14:1128748. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1128748
34
LiuY.FengQ.GuoK. (2023). Physical activity and depression of Chinese college students: chain mediating role of rumination and anxiety. Front. Psychol.14:1190836. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1190836
35
LöweB.DeckerO.MüllerS.BrählerE.SchellbergD.HerzogW.et al. (2008). Validation and standardization of the generalized anxiety disorder screener (GAD-7) in the general population. Med. Care.46, 266–274. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e318160d093
36
MaroufizadehS.Omani-SamaniR.Almasi-HashianiA.AminiP.SepidarkishM. (2019). The reliability and validity of the patient health questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) and PHQ-2 in patients with infertility. Reprod. Health.16:137. doi: 10.1186/s12978-019-0802-x
37
MaurerD. M.RaymondT. J.DavisB. N. (2018). Depression: screening and diagnosis. Am. Fam. Physician.98, 508–515.
38
McNallyR. J. (2021). Network analysis of psychopathology: controversies and challenges. Annu. Rev. Clin. Psychol.17, 31–53. doi: 10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-081219-092850
39
MilgramL.TimpanoK. R. (2024). A network analysis of GAD, MDD, and OCD: symptom overlap and shared risk/maintenance factors. J. Psychopathol. Behav. Assess.46, 821–838. doi: 10.1007/s10862-024-10156-x
40
OpsahlT.AgneessensF.SkvoretzJ. (2010). Node centrality in weighted networks: generalizing degree and shortest paths. Soc. Networks.32, 245–251. doi: 10.1016/j.socnet.2010.03.006
41
PearceM.GarciaL.AbbasA.StrainT.SchuchF. B.GolubicR.et al. (2022). Association between physical activity and risk of depression: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Psychiatr.79, 550–559. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2022.0609
42
RecchiaF.BernalJ. D. K.FongD. Y.WongS. H. S.ChungP. K.ChanD. K. C.et al. (2023). Physical activity interventions to alleviate depressive symptoms in children and adolescents: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Pediatr.177, 132–140. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2022.5090
43
RezaieL.NorouziE.BrattyA. J.KhazaieH. (2023). Better sleep quality and higher physical activity levels predict lower emotion dysregulation among persons with major depression disorder. BMC Psychol.11:171. doi: 10.1186/s40359-023-01213-3
44
SabistonC. M.JewettR.Ashdown-FranksG.BelangerM.BrunetJ.O'LoughlinE.et al. (2016). Number of years of team and individual sport participation during adolescence and depressive symptoms in early adulthood. J. Sport Exerc. Psychol.38, 105–110. doi: 10.1123/jsep.2015-0175
45
SateiaM. J. (2014). International classification of sleep disorders-third edition: highlights and modifications. Chest.146, 1387–1394. doi: 10.1378/chest.14-0970
46
SmithP. J.MerwinR. M. (2021). The role of exercise in management of mental health disorders: an integrative review. Annu. Rev. Med.72, 45–62. doi: 10.1146/annurev-med-060619-022943
47
SpitzerR. L.KroenkeK.WilliamsJ. B. (1999). Validation and utility of a self-report version of PRIME-MD: the PHQ primary care study. Prim. Care Eval. Mental Disorders Patient Health Questionnaire Jama.282, 1737–1744. doi: 10.1001/jama.282.18.1737
48
SpitzerR. L.KroenkeK.WilliamsJ. B.LöweB. (2006). A. brief measure for assessing generalized anxiety disorder: the GAD-7. Arch. Intern. Med.166, 1092–1097. doi: 10.1001/archinte.166.10.1092
49
TadrosM.LiS.UptonE.NewbyJ.Werner-SeidlerA. (2023). Preferences of university students for a psychological intervention designed to improve sleep: focus group study. JMIR Human Factors.10:e44145. doi: 10.2196/44145
50
TaoY.HouW.NiuH.MaZ.ZhangS.ZhangL.et al. (2022). Centrality and bridge symptoms of anxiety, depression, and sleep disturbance among college students during the COVID-19 pandemic-a network analysis. Curr. Psychol.. doi: 10.1007/s12144-022-03443-x. [Epub ahead of print].
51
TianW.YanG.XiongS.ZhangJ.PengJ.ZhangX.et al. (2021). Burden of depressive and anxiety disorders in China and its provinces, 1990-2021: findings from the global burden of disease study. Brit. J. Psychiatr.:J. Mental Sci.2025, 1–11. doi: 10.1192/bjp.2024.267
52
van BorkuloC. D.van BorkR.BoschlooL.KossakowskiJ. J.TioP.SchoeversR. A.et al. (2023). Comparing network structures on three aspects: a permutation test. Psychol. Methods.28, 1273–1285. doi: 10.1037/met0000476
53
VerweijI. M.RomeijnN.SmitD. J.PiantoniG.Van SomerenE. J.van der WerfY. D.et al. (2014). Sleep deprivation leads to a loss of functional connectivity in frontal brain regions. BMC Neurosci.15:88. doi: 10.1186/1471-2202-15-88
54
WangW.BianQ.ZhaoY.LiX.WangW.DuJ.et al. (2014). Reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the patient health questionnaire (PHQ-9) in the general population. Gen. Hosp. Psychiatr.36, 539–544. doi: 10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2014.05.021
55
WatsonA.TimperioA.BrownH.BestK.HeskethK. D. (2017). Effect of classroom-based physical activity interventions on academic and physical activity outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int. J. Behav. Nutr. Phys. Act.14:114. doi: 10.1186/s12966-017-0569-9
56
World Health Organization (2018). Global Action Plan on Physical Activity 2018-2030: More Active People for Healthier World. Available online at: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789241514187 (Accessed November 25, 2020).
57
World Health Organization (2020). WHO Guidelines on Physical Activity and Sedentary Behaviour. Available online at: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240015128 (Accessed November 25, 2020).
58
WuY.CaiM. (2024). Network analysis of depression, anxiety, and quality of life among widowed older adults in China. Curr. Psychol.43, 29865–29877. doi: 10.1007/s12144-024-06634-w
59
ZhangY.CuiY.LiY.LuH.HuangH.SuiJ.et al. (2024). Network analysis of depressive and anxiety symptoms in older Chinese adults with diabetes mellitus. Front. Psychiatr.15:1328857. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1328857
60
ZhaoB.DengX.ZhouZ. (2025). Connection between college students' sports activities, depression, and anxiety: the mediating role of self-esteem. BMC Psychol.13:499. doi: 10.1186/s40359-025-02838-2
61
ZhouS. J.WangL. L. Q. i. M.YangX. J.GaoL.ZhangS. Y.et al. (2021). Depression, anxiety, and suicidal ideation in Chinese university students during the COVID-19 pandemic. Front. Psychol.12:669833. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.669833
Summary
Keywords
anxiety, basketball, depression, mental health, network analysis, sleep problems, university students
Citation
Wu X and Wang X (2026) Depression, anxiety, and sleep problems among Chinese university students enrolled in basketball elective courses: a network psychometric analysis. Front. Psychol. 17:1738600. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2026.1738600
Received
03 November 2025
Revised
31 January 2026
Accepted
09 February 2026
Published
04 March 2026
Volume
17 - 2026
Edited by
Khaled Trabelsi, University of Sfax, Tunisia
Reviewed by
Kais Elabed, High Institute of Sport and Physical Education of Sfax, Tunisia
Pu Peng, Zhejiang University, China
Updates
Copyright
© 2026 Wu and Wang.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Xiaofeng Wang, xiaofwang1@hotmail.com
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.