Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

EDITORIAL article

Front. Psychol., 04 February 2026

Sec. Performance Science

Volume 17 - 2026 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2026.1764946

This article is part of the Research TopicWomen in Performance ScienceView all 11 articles

Editorial: Women in performance science

  • 1Human Informatics and Interaction Research Institute, National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology (AIST), Tsukuba, Japan
  • 2Department of Human and Engineered Environmental Studies, Graduate School of Frontier Sciences, The University of Tokyo, Kashiwa, Japan
  • 3Institute of Human Sciences, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Japan
  • 4Department of STEM Education, Mary Immaculate College, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland
  • 5Graduate School of Teacher Education, Tokyo Gakugei University, Tokyo, Japan
  • 6Royal Northern College of Music, Manchester, United Kingdom

Editorial on the Research Topic
Women in performance science

We are delighted to present the Research Topic “Women in Performance Science” as a platform to promote the work of women scientists in the field of performance science. Women constitute only a minority of global researchers (UNESCO Institute for Statistics, 2020). This disparity stems from the persistent biases and gender stereotypes that dissuade women from pursuing science. Hence, this Research Topic has been launched to showcase women scientists' research across all sub-fields of performance science. Under this Research Topic, we have published 10 articles written by 31 authors from Australia, Canada, Japan, Portugal, the United Kingdom, and the United States. These articles include seven original research articles, two brief research reports, and a systematic review, encompassing diverse academic approaches, including pedagogy, psychology, physiology, and acoustics. A summary of each article is presented below.

Fujimoto and Uesaka examined how learning experiences can either promote or impede interpretive autonomy, and how this, in turn, influences the learning behaviors and wellbeing of eight elite piano and violin students. Werktreue internalization served as an analytical framework for the interview data, and its alignment with the self-determination theory emerged through the analysis. The findings suggested that interpretive autonomy fosters self-regulated learning and supports students' wellbeing. Furthermore, this study highlights that nurturing autonomy is essential from the earliest stages of music learning.

Goh et al. investigated gender marginalization within the Australian jazz and improvisation industries. Using a quantitative survey of 124 practitioners, they analyzed how symbolic boundaries reinforce male hegemony. Findings revealed that gender diverse individuals experience the most severe exclusion, while women report distinct challenges regarding work opportunities. Furthermore, awareness of sexual harassment was widespread across all genders. These results underscore the critical need for targeted inclusion strategies and enhanced safety measures to dismantle structural inequities.

Kondo et al. investigated the aspects of opera singing that influence overall performance evaluations by expert judges. They asked four experts to rate the performances of “Caro mio ben” by 10 trained female singers. Acoustic features such as singing power ratio and harmonic-to-noise ratio were also calculated. Consequently, the subjective rating of vibrato and the objective measurement of singing power ratio emerged as significant predictors of the overall performance score. This study contributes to elucidating the perceptual mechanisms underlying expert evaluations of opera singing.

Moura et al. reviewed solo music performance assessment systems, examining across instruments, rating methods, and target audiences. They highlighted the importance of the context, assessment purpose, and institutional culture, noting that both general and instrument-oriented methods can work effectively. Given that technique strongly shapes performance quality and expression, its weighting in assessment requires careful consideration. A shift from qualitative scales to detailed rubrics can improve the feedback for examiners and students. Finally, tailoring assessment tools for beginner, intermediate, and advanced students is important.

Perrier et al. examined the wellbeing of 16 professional female musicians using the self-determination theory. Participants reported mostly positive effects of being a musician, with autonomy and everyday experiences of mastery strongly supporting wellbeing. Lack of control and limited practice time created stress and reduced feelings of competence. Balancing work and life, especially decisions about having children, was a major challenge. Musicians developed resilience through self-compassion, organizational skills, and maintenance of focus. A deep love for music and transcendent performance experiences provided profound emotional and psychological satisfaction.

Sayers investigated pedagogical strategies for improvisation in North Indian classical music. Using audio-visual analyses of lessons in India, this study examined how oral transmission facilitates skill acquisition. Rather than being spontaneous, improvisation developed through the rigorous imitation and memorization of structured sequences, where “inexact replication” eventually fostered creative recomposition. These results underscore the cognitive sophistication of oral traditions, demonstrating that memory and implicit learning are fundamental for developing musical competence in non-notated systems.

Stephens-Himonides and Young investigated teacher identity within the Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK) framework. Through a case study of an experienced female music educator, they examined how personal background intersects with technology use in piano instruction. The study revealed that identity significantly shapes pedagogical choices and technology integration. Consequently, the authors argued in favor of extending the TPACK framework to include identity, providing a more holistic approach to supporting technology adoption in education.

Takagi et al. validated the Japanese version of the Kenny Music Performance Anxiety Inventory-Revised (K-MPAI-R). Data were collected from 400 Japanese musicians. An exploratory factor analysis extracted seven factors similar to those of the original scale. The scale demonstrated high internal consistency. Criterion-related validity was confirmed through strong correlations with other anxiety measures. Therefore, the Japanese version of the K-MPAI-R was considered a reliable and valid tool for research on music performance anxiety among Japanese musicians.

Watanabe et al. explored the optimal pre-performance state of professional musicians by examining the impact of memory recall. They asked 36 wind instrument players to recall positive or negative performance memories or imagine routine pre-performance activities. Recalling positive performance memories significantly enhanced subjective performance achievement, emotional arousal, and valence. The results suggested that positive recall fosters sympathetic activation and positive emotions, which collectively enhance performance achievement. This study provided objective evidence of the usefulneess of recalling positive performance experiences for professional musicians.

Yoshie and Morijiri investigated the impact of past and current social support on pre-performance mental states and performance quality among university music students. Students rated the support received from parents, a past teacher, and a current teacher, as well as their pre-performance self-confidence and performance evaluation for a recent major event. Past teacher support uniquely predicted self-confidence and performance quality, suggesting that the teacher support received by middle adolescence is particularly crucial for building student musicians' long-term self-confidence.

In conclusion, the articles within this Research Topic cover diverse topics in performance science, including musicians' wellbeing, pedagogical strategies, performance assessment, and gender equality. We believe that these studies, led by women scientists, will substantially contribute to advancing research in performance science.

Author contributions

MY: Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. MV: Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. YM: Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. JH: Writing – review & editing.

Acknowledgments

We are extremely grateful to all the contributing authors and reviewers of this Research Topic and the Frontiers staff for their support and commitment.

Conflict of interest

The author(s) declared that this work was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

The author MY declared that they were an editorial board member of Frontiers, at the time of submission. This had no impact on the peer review process and the final decision.

Generative AI statement

The author(s) declared that generative AI was not used in the creation of this manuscript.

Any alternative text (alt text) provided alongside figures in this article has been generated by Frontiers with the support of artificial intelligence and reasonable efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, including review by the authors wherever possible. If you identify any issues, please contact us.

Publisher's note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

References

UNESCO Institute for Statistics (2020). Women in Science. UIS Fact Sheet No: 60. Available online at: https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000375033 (Accessed November 27, 2025).

Google Scholar

Keywords: gender equality, music, pedagogy, performance science, psychology, wellbeing, women

Citation: Yoshie M, Varvarigou M, Morijiri Y and Henley J (2026) Editorial: Women in performance science. Front. Psychol. 17:1764946. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2026.1764946

Received: 10 December 2025; Revised: 10 December 2025;
Accepted: 06 January 2026; Published: 04 February 2026.

Edited and reviewed by: Aaron Williamon, Royal College of Music, United Kingdom

Copyright © 2026 Yoshie, Varvarigou, Morijiri and Henley. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Michiko Yoshie, bS55b3NoaWVAYWlzdC5nby5qcA==

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.