ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Sports Act. Living, 17 February 2022
Sec.Elite Sports and Performance Enhancement
https://doi.org/10.3389/fspor.2022.798255

Eccentric and Isometric Shoulder Rotation Strength and Range of Motion: Normative Values for Adolescent Competitive Tennis Players

Fredrik Johansson1,2*, Martin Asker2,3, Andreas Malmberg1, Jaime Fernandez-Fernandez4, Anna Warnqvist5 and Ann Cools6
  • 1Tennis Research and Performance Group, Department of Health Promotion Science, Sophiahemmet University, Stockholm, Sweden
  • 2Scandinavian College of Naprapathic Manual Medicine, Stockholm, Sweden
  • 3Handball Research Group, Department of Health Promotion Science, Sophiahemmet University, Stockholm, Sweden
  • 4Department of Physical Activity and Sports Sciences, Universidad de León, León, Spain
  • 5Division of Biostatistics, Institute of Environmental Medicine, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden
  • 6Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Gent, Belgium

The aim of this cross-sectional study was to investigate isometric internal rotation (IR), external rotation (ER), abduction (ABD), and eccentric external rotation (eccER) shoulder strength and rotational range of motion (ROM) in adolescent male and female competitive tennis players. Additional aims of the study were to provide a tennis-specific normative database based on a large sample of players to deepen the knowledge regarding shoulder strength and ROM for adolescent competitive tennis players, and to discuss differences based on sex, age, and level of play. Shoulder strength and ROM was assessed in 301 adolescent competitive tennis players, 176 boys and 125 girls with a mean age of 14.6 and 14.4 years, respectively. Outcome variables of interest were isometric IR and ER strength, ABD strength, eccER shoulder strength, intermuscular strength ratios ER/IR and eccER/IR, IR ROM, ER ROM, and total range of motion (TROM). A General Linear Model two-way ANOVA was used to analyze differences in sex, age, and level of play. The findings of this study demonstrated age, side, and sex differences in the shoulder isometric strength, the eccER strength and ROM in adolescent competitive tennis players. Furthermore, when strength was expressed as ratios ER/IR and eccER/IR both sexes showed a lower ratio for eccER/IR in national players (0.95 ± 0.22 and 0.95 ± 0.23) compared to regional players (1.01 ± 0.32 and 1.07 ± 0.29) for male and female players, respectively. In conclusion, this paper presents a tennis-specific normative database for shoulder rotation strength and ROM in adolescent male and female competitive players. The key points in this evaluation are strength values normalized to body mass, intermuscular ratios, and TROM.

Introduction

Tennis is an intermittent sport in which players need to master a range of demands of physical components, such as aerobic and anaerobic capacity, linear sprint and change-of-direction speed, agility, and muscle power to reach the highest levels of performance (Fernandez-Fernandez et al., 2018; Björklund et al., 2020). Furthermore, male and female professional tennis players perform the serve motion to a larger extent compared with their younger counterparts (i.e., high performance junior players) (Myers et al., 2016). At high-performance junior levels, players perform per match an average of 60–70 serves at a speed range from 145 to 160 kph (Kovalchik and Reid, 2017). From a biomechanical point of view the shoulder moves into an external rotation (ER) of 170 degrees in the late cocking phase, followed by a shoulder internal rotation (IR) taking place after ball impact at 2,420 and 1,370°/s for male and female players, respectively (Fleisig et al., 2003). In addition, a strong positive correlation between peak serve speed and shoulder IR and ER strength has been shown (Hayes et al., 2021), highlighting the link between good shoulder capacity and sport-specific performance. The competitive adolescent tennis player has previously been reported to have age related increase in shoulder strength, decreased rotational range of motion (ROM) in IR, increased ER ROM, and decreased total ROM (TROM) in the dominant arm (DA) used for the overhead serve motion, parallel to the growth process (Cools et al., 2014b; Gillet et al., 2017; Fernandez-Fernandez et al., 2019).

Investigations of adolescent tennis players competing on the highest level have reported injury rates of 1.2–2.8 injuries per 1,000 h played (Pluim et al., 2016; Gescheit et al., 2019; Moreno-Pérez et al., 2019) and amongst these injury rates, overuse injuries have been reported to be the most common health complaint among junior tennis players with a weekly prevalence of 12.1%, compared to acute injuries with a weekly prevalence of 3% (Pluim et al., 2016). Moreover, a considerable proportion of these overuse injuries are in the dominant shoulder, with an incidence of 8.2 injuries per 1,000 playing hours in tennis matches, accounting for 15.9% of all overuse injuries in high-performance junior tennis players (Pluim et al., 2006; Fu et al., 2018).

Factors of importance for the origin of injury in overhead athletes such as handball and tennis players, and across all age groups have been reported to be, imbalances in terms of low intermuscular ratios between ER/IR strength, ER weakness, decreased IR ROM and decreased TROM of the shoulder (Saccol et al., 2010; Andersson et al., 2017; Achenbach and Luig, 2020; Asker et al., 2020).

Since adolescent athletes are not yet fully developed, and early onset of adaptations occur, continuous assessments at shoulder level throughout puberty are crucial for the guidance and optimization of the tennis players training regime (Oliver et al., 2020). In view of clinical assessment, field-friendly measurement tools which are reliable, valid, and cost-effective like the hand-held dynamometer (HHD) and smartphone inclinometer have been proposed (Cools et al., 2014b; Mejia-Hernandez et al., 2018). Furthermore, a recent meta-analysis showed good absolute reliability for HHDs in shoulder internal and external rotator strength assessment reinforcing previous studies (Chamorro et al., 2021). Previously, a general reference database based on HHD measurements for tennis players has been published, however, the study sample was relatively small (n = 65), the players were 18–50 years old, and a recreational playing level constituted the subjects represented (Cools et al., 2016).

Therefore, the primary aim with our study is to provide normative values at shoulder level for isometric and eccentricER (eccER) strength, intermuscular ratios ER/IR, and rotational ROM for the adolescent competitive tennis player. In addition, we hypothesized that sex, age, side, and level of play differences would exist between test values.

Materials and Methods

Participants

Three hundred and one adolescent competitive tennis players, 176 males and 125 females, mean age 14.6 (±2.0) and 14.4 (±2.0) years, respectively, volunteered to participate in the study. Recruitment of the players was performed via all seven tennis regions in Sweden and included both national (n = 50) and regional (n = 251) level players. A baseline questionnaire was filled out before the testing and an informed consent form was read and signed by the players, if under 15 years of age, the players' legal guardian read and signed the consent form. Inclusion criteria were (1) competitive level of at least regional level in Sweden (2) minimum of 8 h of total training volume per week on average. Subjects were excluded if they had shoulder surgery or dislocation the last 6 months. Subclassification of the tennis players was made based on sex, age, and level of play. Classification for age was divided into (a) 14 years and under and (b) 15 years and over, in accordance with the competing system of Tennis Europe and the International Tennis Federation1,2 In addition, level of play was divided into regional and national level based on the high-performance program conducted by the Swedish Tennis Association3.

Ethical Statement

The study was in accordance with the declaration of Helsinki and preapproved by the Regional Ethical Review Board, Stockholm, Sweden (approval no. 2012/1731/2).

Testing Procedure

Prior to the testing procedure, the players body mass was assessed on a digital scale, shoes and heavy clothing were removed and the result was recorded to the nearest decimal fraction. A supervised and standardized warm-up program for 10 min was performed, consisting of several multiplanar shoulder movements including three light elastic band exercises performed 2 sets x 15 repetitions/side and two general flexibility exercises for the thoracic spine and the upper limb was performed 2 sets x 10 repetitions/side by the players prior to the testing. The assessments consisting of both strength and mobility in a standardized field-based setting were performed on a single visit by three teams of three assessors per team, all teams were trained prior to the testing by an experienced clinician and user of the HHD.

Glenohumeral Muscle Strength

For all strength measurements, the MicroFET© HHD was used (MicroFet 2, Hoggan Health Industries Inc., Biometrics, The Netherlands). To control the testing procedure for learning effects and fatigue, the order of the tests was randomized between sides. The protocol consisting of six different strength tests were performed in both the DA and non-dominant arm (NDA) independently: (1 and 2) isometric shoulder strength of IR and ER at shoulder level with 0° of abduction (ABD), (3 and 4) isometric shoulder strength of IR and ER in 90° ABD, (5) isometric shoulder strength of ABD in the scapular plane, (6) eccER shoulder strength testing in an abducted position from 90° of ER to 0° of ER were included (Clarsen et al., 2014; Cools et al., 2014a). Strength measurements were recorded in Newton (N) by the HHD, and the second examiner registered the test value into the test-protocol. Each test was repeated two times with a pause in between trials of 20 s (Cools et al., 2014a).

Isometric IR and ER testing took place in a seated position, the arm was supported in shoulder position at 90° of ABD and neutral rotation (illustrative Figures 1, 2) (Cools et al., 2014a). Isometric ABD was measured with the player in a standing position with the arm held 30° of ABD in the scapular plane (Clarsen et al., 2014). For all strength tests the participants were asked to build up their force gradually to a maximum voluntary effort over a 2-s period and hold the maximal voluntary effort for 5 s, two sets of trials were performed, and the average value was used for calculation.

FIGURE 1
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 1. Measurement of isometric muscle strength of the internal rotators using a hand-held dynamometer (CompuFET, Hoggan Health Industries Inc., Groningen, The Netherlands).

FIGURE 2
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 2. Measurement of isometric muscle strength of the external rotators and starting position for eccentric strength measurement using a hand-held dynamometer (CompuFET, Hoggan Health Industries Inc., Groningen, The Netherlands).

The eccER shoulder strength testing was performed in a seated position, starting in 90° of ABD and 90° of ER, with the arm supported by the examiner, the HHD was positioned 2 cm proximal of the processus styloideus ulnae and placed on the dorsal side of the forearm (Johansson et al., 2015b). The participant performed a resisted ER, and the examiner moved the arm into IR for 90° in 3 s (illustrative Figure 2).

All testing procedures described above demonstrated good to excellent intra- and inter-rater reliability (Cools et al., 2014a; Johansson et al., 2015b).

Glenohumeral Internal- and External Rotation Range of Motion

Shoulder IR and ER passive ROMs were measured for the dominant and non-dominant shoulder using a smartphone inclinometer app, GetMyROM (version 1.0.3; Interactive Medical Productions, Hampton, NH, USA) and following the methods previously described in the literature (Mejia-Hernandez et al., 2018). Participants were supine with their shoulders positioned in 90° of ABD in the coronal plane. Measurements for IR and ER ROM were performed in the plane of ABD, and a small towel roll was used to maintain the position of the humerus. The inclinometer was positioned on the player's forearm (illustrative Figure 3). Two examiners performed the test, examiner one took the shoulder to full ROM without using overpressure, scapular movement was controlled by palpating the coracoid process, examiner two read and noted the ROM in IR and ER. These procedures have previously shown good test-retest reliability (Cools et al., 2014b), and excellent intra- and interrater reliability (Cools et al., 2014b).

FIGURE 3
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 3. Measurement of glenohumeral internal-rotation range of motion using a smartphone inclinometer application (GetMyROM (version 1.0.3; Interactive Medical Productions, Hampton, NH, USA).

Statistical Analysis

To analyze the difference in isometric and eccentric strength and the intermuscular ratios a general linear model two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) for repeated measures, in which the within-subject factor was side (two levels), and the between-subject factors were sex (two levels), level of play (three levels), and age category (three levels). The eccentric and isometric strength measurements were analyzed both in Newton and as normalized by body mass. The following isometric muscle strength ratios were also calculated: ER/IR at 0–0° and 90–90° and the functional ratio eccER/isometric IR. For mean calculations and ratios between different measurements, the individual measurements were treated separately and no mean values of the two measurements per individual were used.

To assess the reliability of the strength measurements, the Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) (3.1), two-way mixed model, agreement) were calculated, along with their 95% confidence intervals, over the two measurements taken. Standard error of measurement (SEM) was calculated as SD*√ (1- ICC), where SD is the standard deviation of the measurement. Minimum detectable change (MDC95) was calculated as SEM*1.96*√2.

Interaction effects, as well as main effects were explored. In case of absence of any significant interactions, main effects for (age, side, sex, and level of play) were analyzed. In the ANOVA a p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Post-hoc analyses were performed using a Bonferroni test when a significant difference was found with ANOVA. For the ANOVA analysis, the mean value was taken of the two measurements done for each subject. In case of main effects for sex and side, no post-hoc tests were necessary.

Analysis was done in R (version 3.6.1, R Core Team, 2019). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria) and Stata, version 15 (StataCorp. 2017. Stata Statistical Software: Release 15. College Station, TX: StataCorp LLC.).

Results

Anthropometric data, training background and level of play are summarized in Table 1.

TABLE 1
www.frontiersin.org

Table 1. Characteristic data of the tennis players in the study (n = 301).

The results of the reliability study measurement are summarized in Table 2.

TABLE 2
www.frontiersin.org

Table 2. Intraexaminer reliability (ICC3,k) with their 95% CI, SEM and MDC (N) for the range of motion, isometric, and eccentric strength testing of the rotator cuff.

Supplementary Tables 1, 2 show the results of the isometric strength, eccentric strength, and ER/IR strength ratios and eccER/IR strength ratios testing for male and female players, respectively, and (a) across all ages, (b) divided by age, and (c) divided by level of play.

Tables 3, 4 display the rotational ROM results of male and female players, respectively, and (a) across all ages, (b) divided by age, and (c) divided by level of play. Summarized results for the ANOVA repeated measures statistical analysis and post-hoc tests, are displayed in Table 5. Furthermore, in Appendix 1, ROM, strength values and intermuscular ratios are presented for male and female players as percentiles and in Appendix 2, a comparison between male and female players shoulder strength are presented (Figures 4, 5 in Appendix 2).

TABLE 3
www.frontiersin.org

Table 3. Descriptive analysis (means and SDs) of the results of the Range of Motion (ROM) for the male (n = 176) subjects.

TABLE 4
www.frontiersin.org

Table 4. Descriptive analysis (means and SDs) of the results of the Range of Motion (ROM) for the female subjects (n = 125).

TABLE 5
www.frontiersin.org

Table 5. Results from the repeated measures ANOVA for all variables.

Present results show significant differences for age and sex in all six strength tests. However, the three calculated intermuscular strength ratios based on the strength testing showed a lower ratio in the male players compared to the female players, most likely due to the strong internal rotators seen in male players. Overall, the reported test values of strength in the DA were higher than in the NDA, however, the NDA showed higher values of intermuscular ratios. Moreover, national level players are stronger than their regional counterparts with male players showing the largest difference. Male players increase their strength values with age but when normalized to body mass the increase remains only in isometric ABD strength. In addition, male players are stronger than female players even when strength values are normalized to body mass. Female players increase their strength with age in absolute values but when normalized to body mass the strength results show a decrease. The eccER/isometric IR ratio revealed a decrease with increased age and national players reporting a lower ratio than regional players.

A two-way interaction effect was significant for age x sex and age x playing level for the six strength tests plus the intermuscular strength ratio: isometric ER/IR 0–0 and the eccER/isometric IR 90–90, reflecting that there are differences for age but not for both sexes/playing level or there are differences for sexes/playing level but not for different age groups.

Analysis for three-way interaction effects showed significant strength differences for side x age x playing level in isometric IR and ER at neutral position 0°- 0°. A 3-way interaction effect was also significant for sex x side x playing level regarding ER ROM. Neither of the 3-way interaction effects showed a significant difference in the post-hoc Bonferroni analysis. However, the two-way interaction effect, sex x age, remained significant in all strength tests in the post-hoc Bonferroni analysis. Lastly, the same significant outcome was noted for isometric IR strength at 0–0 and 90–90 position.

The ER ROM showed significant sex x side x playing level in the three-way interaction effect with male national players showing increased ER ROM in the DA compared to male regional players as well as compared to all female players. Furthermore, the TROM and ER ROM displayed significant differences in the two-way interaction effect for sex x side, with the DA showing increased ER and decreased TROM for both male and female players. Finally, the side x playing level in the two-way interaction effect revealed a significant difference in the IR and TROM in both sexes. The post-hoc Bonferroni analysis confirmed the previous results in ROM presented in the two-way interaction effects for side x playing level regarding IR, and sex x side regarding TROM and ER.

Discussion

The main purpose of the study was to establish normative values at shoulder level for isometric and eccentric strength, as well as rotational ROM for the adolescent competitive tennis player. The main results showed, age and sex differences in the isometric as well as the eccER shoulder strength in adolescent competitive tennis players. Secondly, the DA is stronger than the NDA and national players are stronger than their regional counterparts. Thirdly, age, sex, and playing level differences for the intermuscular strength ratio: isometric ER/IR 0–0 and the eccER/isometric IR 90–90 were seen. Finally, both male and female players showed a difference in IR ROM of the DA compared to the NDA, however, male national players revealed higher values in ER ROM in the DA compared to regional players.

Shoulder Rotational Strength

Present results showed that glenohumeral strength values were higher in male players compared with female players, which is in line with previous studies of young tennis players (Cools et al., 2014b; Gillet et al., 2017; Fernandez-Fernandez et al., 2019). Both male and female players are stronger in the dominant side when compared to the non-dominant side confirming the results of a previous study on adolescent tennis players (Cools et al., 2014b) and highlighting the asymmetric nature of the sport (Rogowski et al., 2008). The asymmetry may be a result of playing tennis rather than handedness (Rogowski et al., 2008). Several asymmetric findings in the dominant shoulder have been reported in literature, including both male and female players, adolescent, and professional players, reporting clinical infraspinatus atrophy, early signs of tendinosis in the infraspinatus and supraspinatus tendons, ROM deficits and increased strength in the dominant shoulder (Johansson et al., 2015a; Young et al., 2015; Gillet et al., 2017; Ellenbecker et al., 2020). Therefore, it seems inevitable to not be affected in the dominant shoulder by these high numbers of repetitions. However, if these adaptations are to be considered as normal adaptations, risk factors or to be entitled as maladaptation's needs further investigation. Regarding the development of strength levels, results for both sexes increase with age as seen in other studies (Cools et al., 2014b; Gillet et al., 2017; Fernandez-Fernandez et al., 2019). However, when normalized to body mass, our study shows that the strength values of the female players are leveling out comparing the age group 14 years and under with the age group 15 years plus, whilst male players still increase their relative strength throughout adolescence. In view of rapid anthropometry changes during puberty and the onset of hormones girls are more likely to have a tougher challenge to sustain their strength normalized to body mass in comparison with the boys. From the performance and prevention perspective, it would be recommended that tennis players on the international level in transition from Tennis Europe under 14 to junior ITF 15–18 years with an increased level of competition, improve their shoulder strength within this timeframe. Furthermore, a long-term athlete development strategy is recommended also in the perspective of strength development during this period provided that sufficient time are given to the players by the coaches in the training plan to improve strength.

Playing Level and Strength

In view of the playing level perspective, national players presented higher strength values overall compared to their regional level peers. The difference was especially observed in the isometric IR 90–90 position reporting higher values (134.8 ± 33.4 vs. 126.0 ± 46.0 N and 107.3 ± 21.6 vs. 96.5 ± 25.7 N) in the DA, for male and female players, respectively. Considering that IR at high shoulder elevation angles takes place during the tennis serve motion, the difference in strength results in the IR 90–90 position may reflect the higher volume of sport-specific training seen in national players compared to regional players. Consequently, this repetitive motion in shoulder IR is most likely to develop IR strength over time as the service motion to a great extent engage the internal rotators of the shoulder complex (Escamilla and Andrews, 2009).

Eccentric External Rotation Strength

This is the first study to investigate eccER shoulder strength in a large cohort of adolescent competitive tennis players using an HHD. In our study male players showed eccER strength increase with age, higher values in the DA and a difference between national and regional players. However, female players showed only an improvement in eccER strength with age, no difference was found either for side or level of play. The eccER strength normalized to body mass for male and female players were in our study 2.0 and 1.8 N/kg, respectively. In comparison with a similar cohort in age, investigating competitive adolescent handball players, results were similar, reporting 1.9 and 1.7 N/kg for male and female players, respectively (Asker et al., 2020). Furthermore, a sample of 65 recreational tennis players in the age group 18–25 years reported normalized eccER strength values of 2.2 and 2.1 for male and female subjects, respectively (Cools et al., 2016). In summary, the low ratios in adolescent athletes may reflect the challenge to develop eccER strength in overhead athletes during puberty no matter the sport. In addition, recreational players may not be as fatigued in the shoulder as competitive players regardless of age and therefore reporting higher values in eccER.

Intermuscular Ratios in Dominant and Non-dominant Arm

Results revealed in all three calculations for both male and female players a lower ratio in the DA compared to the NDA. Our results showed an eccER/IR isometric ratio 90–90° of 1.00/1.13 for male players and 1.05/1.23 for female players in the DA and NDA, respectively. These results are in line with previously reported ratios, although reported in an older sample (27.6 ± 8.4 years), results being lower in the DA of tennis player (Cools et al., 2016). In addition, similar results have been reported in a younger cohort of tennis players, reporting lower isometric ER/IR intermuscular ratios in the DA (Gillet et al., 2017; Fernandez-Fernandez et al., 2019). This lower ratio may be explained by several factors. Firstly, the DA is subject to a high number of repetitions and therefore the shoulder internal and external rotator muscles are most likely to be fatigued. Secondly, when calculating ratios, we need to consider the IR strength being more developed in the DA and especially in male players, due to the high numbers of serving compared to the NDA not being used in the overhead motion, therefore affecting the ER/IR ratio calculation. Moreover, intermuscular ratios being lower in the DA of adolescent athletes is a phenomenon seen in other sports as well, such as handball and baseball (Trakis et al., 2008; Asker et al., 2020).

Level of Play and Intermuscular Ratios

In view of level of play, male and female national players in our study presented a lower ratio for the eccER/IR strength ratio compared to regional players. In the light of national players being stronger especially in isometric IR 90–90° this might be the explaining factor for the lower ratio, on the other hand, it should also be highlighted that with more hours per week in match, practice, and fitness, a potential fatigue of the shoulder internal and external rotator muscles may occur. In view of ER/IR ratios, at both positions (0 and 90°) the male and female players regardless of level in our study performed a ratio <0.75. Therefore, it may be of special importance to improve the ER strength of the shoulder since decreased ER strength has been previously reported to be associated with injury in the adolescent and elite handball player (Saccol et al., 2010; Asker et al., 2020). In addition, low ratios of ER/IR have also been reported to increase injury risk in the professional baseball pitcher (Byram et al., 2010).

Range of Motion

In overall the ROM results revealed a difference between sexes with male players showing less IR and TROM compared to female players, both sexes showing less IR and increased ER in the DA compared to the NDA. In addition, female players displayed a decrease in TROM in the DA compared to the NDA. Male players showed a decrease in IR ROM and increase in ER ROM with age. However, TROM was not affected, therefore the results suggesting a shift in the rotational range to be the explanation (Whiteley et al., 2009). In the perspective of level of play, male national players displayed higher ER ROM and higher TROM compared to regional players, IR remained the same for both playing levels. Female players showed no difference either in age or in level of play. This increase in ER ROM in male national players may be a consequence of more training and match volume and thereby a greater number of overhead motions enhancing ROM in ER (Myers et al., 2016). In addition, based on practitioner experience it might reflect a traditional training paradigm with male players practicing more serves on the national level compared with female national players practicing more from the baseline. Previous studies of ROM in tennis players have reported a decrease in IR with an increase in age, TROM remains the same with age, however, a shift is apparent with an increase in ER in combination with a decrease in IR (Cools et al., 2014b; Gillet et al., 2017; Fernandez-Fernandez et al., 2019; Moreno-Pérez et al., 2019).

Strength and Limitations

The strengths of the study were firstly the large cohort including 301 adolescent competitive national and regional tennis players, therefore representing most of the available players. Secondly, the cohort included both male and female players enabling the possibility to investigate and compare the two sexes. Thirdly, the reliability of the clinical measures performed with a HHD was good to excellent, with ICC ranging between 0.87–0.91, SEM 3.81–4.51, and MDC 10.55–12.50, consequently, making the results clinically relevant (Cools et al., 2014a; Johansson et al., 2015b). In addition, the smartphone app used for ROM assessments has also proven to be reliable in the clinical setting (Mejia-Hernandez et al., 2018). Lastly, the present study and its results have high levels of ecological validity and may offer a starting point to suggest practical applications to tennis-specific fitness and prevention training.

However, this study has some limitations. Firstly, it should be highlighted that the reference values suggested here only is comparable in the clinical setting provided that the clinician is using the HHD as an assessment tool. Moreover, no standardized threshold in force output was used between the two trials, potentially this could affect the results if one of the trials being a submaximal effort or if there was a learning effect. This would be recommended for future assessments, however, in view of the large cohort it was not possible due to time management. In addition, when assessing stronger players, it may require stronger assessors to resist the strength of the player's push and obtain reliable results (Croteau et al., 2021). Although assessing shoulder strength using an HHD in a field-based setting is reliable, the results should be treated with caution due to high threshold for reliable measures, especially in adolescents (Møller et al., 2018). Furthermore, no external fixation was used during the assessments due to practical and clinical relevance, this might have influenced our results. However, external fixation in the field is not very practical due to the extra time needed to set-up the assessment procedure, therefore, our protocol was developed to be more clinically relevant. The end range in the ROM measurements was determined by subjective criteria, based on clinical skills, but was not objectively controlled. Therefore, the results may be affected by the skills of the examiner. Finally, although this is a large cohort (n = 301), future studies should be focused on international multicenter studies due to the differences in training volume between countries. However, all things considered this normative database may help all stakeholders involved in the adolescent tennis player to make better decisions regarding rehabilitation, return to play and high-performance.

Conclusion

This is the first paper to present specific isometric and eccER shoulder strength values measured with a HHD and shoulder rotational ROM data based on a large (n = 301) cohort of adolescent male and female competitive tennis players. Our most important findings of the study were age and sex differences in the isometric as well as in the eccER shoulder strength. In view of performance the study highlights the gain in shoulder ER ROM and the need for developing strength throughout puberty especially in female players. Finally, the potential risk factor reported as ER weakness is evident also in our cohort.

Data Availability Statement

The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article will be made available by the authors, without undue reservation.

Ethics Statement

The study was in accordance with the declaration of Helsinki and preapproved by the Regional Ethical Review Board, Stockholm, Sweden (approval no. 2012/1731/2). Written informed consent to participate in this study was provided by the participants' legal guardian/next of kin.

Author Contributions

FJ, MA, JF-F, and AC designed the study. FJ, AM, and MA were part of the data collection. FJ, AW, and AC analyzed the data and prepared the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript, contributed to the article, and approved the submitted version.

Funding

This study was funded by the Swedish Naprapathic Association.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher's Note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank the Swedish Tennis Association, and they also want to express their gratitude to all regional and national players who participated in the SMASH study. A special thank you to Cecilia Palmqvist for coordinating the team. Clara Onell for back-office support. Thank you also to Filip Allerkrans, Kristin Haugland, Gustav Knutas, Jonathan Kull, Linnea Lindberg, Daniel Sjödin, Emilie Kristine Slatleim, and David Tveit for assistance in data collection.

Supplementary Material

The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fspor.2022.798255/full#supplementary-material

Footnotes

References

Achenbach, L., and Luig, P. (2020). Epidemiology and injury prevention in handball. Sportverletzung Sportschaden34, 129–135. doi: 10.1055/a-1209-4666

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text

Andersson, S. H., Bahr, R., Clarsen, B., and Myklebust, G. (2017). Preventing overuse shoulder injuries among throwing athletes: a cluster-randomised controlled trial in 660 elite handball players. Br. J. Sports. Med. 51, 1073–1080. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2016-096226

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Asker, M., Waldén, M., Källberg, H., Holm, L. W., and Skillgate, E. (2020). Preseason clinical shoulder test results and shoulder injury rate in adolescent elite handball players: a prospective study. J. Orthop. Sports Phys. Ther. 50, 67–74. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2020.9044

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Björklund, G., Swarén, M., Norman, M., Alonso, J., and Johansson, F. (2020). Metabolic demands, center of mass movement and fractional utilization of v·o2max in elite adolescent tennis players during on-court drills. Front. Sports. Act. 2, 92. doi: 10.3389/fspor.2020.00092

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Byram, I. R., Bushnell, B. D., Dugger, K., Charron, K., Harrell, F. E., and Jr, Noonan, T. J. (2010). Preseason shoulder strength measurements in professional baseball pitchers: identifying players at risk for injury. Am. J. Sports Med. 38, 1375–1382. doi: 10.1177/0363546509360404

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Chamorro, C., Arancibia, M., Trigo, B., Arias-Poblete, L., and Jerez-Mayorga, D. (2021). Absolute reliability and concurrent validity of hand-held dynamometry in shoulder rotator strength assessment: systematic review and meta-analysis. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 18, 9293. doi: 10.1515/med-2017-0052

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Clarsen, B., Bahr, R., Andersson, S. H., Munk, R., and Myklebust, G. (2014). Reduced glenohumeral rotation, external rotation weakness and scapular dyskinesis are risk factors for shoulder injuries among elite male handball players: a prospective cohort study. Br. J. Sports. Med. 48, 1327–1333. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2014-093702

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Cools, A. M., De Wilde, L., Van Tongel, A., Ceyssens, C., Ryckewaert, R., and Cambier, D. C. (2014a). Measuring shoulder external and internal rotation strength and range of motion: comprehensive intra-rater and inter-rater reliability study of several testing protocols. J. Shoulder Elb. Surg. 23, 1454–1461. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2014.01.006

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Cools, A. M., Palmans, T., and Johansson, F. R. (2014b). Age-related, sport-specific adaptions of the shoulder girdle in elite adolescent tennis players. J. Athl. Train. 49, 647–653. doi: 10.4085/1062-6050-49.3.02

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Cools, A. M., Vanderstukken, F., Vereecken, F., Duprez, M., Heyman, K., Goethals, N., et al. (2016). Eccentric and isometric shoulder rotator cuff strength testing using a hand-held dynamometer: reference values for overhead athletes. Knee Surg. Sports Traumatol. Arthrosc. 24, 3838–3847. doi: 10.1007/s00167-015-3755-9

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Croteau, F., Robbins, S. M., and Pearsall, D. (2021). Hand-held shoulder strength measures correlate with isokinetic dynamometry in elite water polo players. J Sport Rehabil. 30, 1233–1236. doi: 10.1123/jsr.2020-0277

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Ellenbecker, T. S., Dines, D. M., Renstrom, P. A., and Windler, G. S. (2020). Visual observation of apparent infraspinatus muscle atrophy in male professional tennis players. Orthop. J. Sports Med. 8, 2325967120958834. doi: 10.1177/2325967120958834

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Escamilla, R. F., and Andrews, J. R. (2009). Shoulder muscle recruitment patterns and related biomechanics during upper extremity sports. Sports Med. 39, 569–590. doi: 10.2165/00007256-200939070-00004

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Fernandez-Fernandez, J., Granacher, U., Sanz-Rivas, D., Sarabia Marín, J. M., Hernandez-Davo, J. L., and Moya, M. (2018). Sequencing effects of neuromuscular training on physical fitness in youth elite tennis players. J. Strength. Cond. Res. 32, 849–856. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000002319

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Fernandez-Fernandez, J., Nakamura, F. Y., Moreno-Perez, V., Lopez-Valenciano, A., Del Coso, J., Gallo-Salazar, C., et al. (2019). Age and sex-related upper body performance differences in competitive young tennis players. PLoS ONE. 14, e0221761. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0221761

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Fleisig, G., Nicholls, R., Elliott, B., and Escamilla, R. (2003). Kinematics used by world class tennis players to produce high-velocity serves. Sports Biomech. 2, 51–64. doi: 10.1080/14763140308522807

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Fu, M. C., Ellenbecker, T. S., Renstrom, P. A., Windler, G. S., and Dines, D. M. (2018). Epidemiology of injuries in tennis players. Curr. Rev. Musculoskelet. 11, 1–5. doi: 10.1007/s12178-018-9452-9

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Gescheit, D. T., Cormack, S. J., Duffield, R., Kovalchik, S., Wood, T. O., Omizzolo, M., et al. (2019). A multi-year injury epidemiology analysis of an elite national junior tennis program. J. Sci. Med. Sport. 22, 11–15. doi: 10.1016/j.jsams.2018.06.006

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Gillet, B., Begon, M., Sevrez, V., Berger-Vachon, C., and Rogowski, I. (2017). Adaptive alterations in shoulder range of motion and strength in young tennis players. J. Athl. Train. 52, 137–144. doi: 10.4085/1062-6050.52.1.10

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Hayes, M. J., Spits, D. R., Watts, D. G., and Kelly, V. G. (2021). Relationship between tennis serve velocity and select performance measures. J. Strength. Cond. Res. 35, 190–197. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000002440

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Johansson, F. R., Skillgate, E., Adolfsson, A., Jenner, G., DeBri, E., Swärdh, L., et al. (2015a). Asymptomatic elite adolescent tennis players' signs of tendinosis in their dominant shoulder compared with their nondominant shoulder. J Athl Train. 50, 1299–1305. doi: 10.4085/1062-6050-51.1.07

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Johansson, F. R., Skillgate, E., Lapauw, M. L., Clijmans, D., Deneulin, V. P., Palmans, T., et al. (2015b). Measuring eccentric strength of the shoulder external rotators using a handheld dynamometer: reliability and validity. J. Athl. Train. 50, 719–725. doi: 10.4085/1062-6050-49.3.72

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Kovalchik, S. A., and Reid, M. (2017). Comparing matchplay characteristics and physical demands of junior and professional tennis athletes in the era of big data. J. Sports. Sci. Med. 16, 489–497.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

Mejia-Hernandez, K., Chang, A., Eardley-Harris, N., Jaarsma, R., Gill, T. K., and McLean, J. M. (2018). Smartphone applications for the evaluation of pathologic shoulder range of motion and shoulder scores-a comparative study. JSES Open Access. 2, 109–114. doi: 10.1016/j.jses.2017.10.001

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Møller, M., Attermann, J., Myklebust, G., Lind, M., Sørensen, H., Hebert, J. J., et al. (2018). The inter- and intrarater reliability and agreement for field-based assessment of scapular control, shoulder range of motion, and shoulder isometric strength in elite adolescent athletes. Phys. Ther. Sport. 32, 212–220. doi: 10.1016/j.ptsp.2018.04.005

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Moreno-Pérez, V., Hernández-Sánchez, S., Fernandez-Fernandez, J., Del Coso, J., and Vera-Garcia, F. J. (2019). Incidence and conditions of musculoskeletal injuries in elite Spanish tennis academies: a prospective study. J. Sports. Med. Phys. Fitness. 59, 655–665. doi: 10.23736/S0022-4707.18.08513-4

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Myers, N. L., Sciascia, A. D., Kibler, W. B., and Uhl, T. L. (2016). Volume-based interval training program for elite tennis players. Sports Health 8, 536–540. doi: 10.1177/1941738116657074

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Oliver, G. D., Downs, J. L., Barbosa, G. M., and Camargo, P. R. (2020). Descriptive profile of shoulder range of motion and strength in youth athletes participating in overhead sports. Int. J. Sports Phys. Ther. 15, 1090–1098. doi: 10.26603/ijspt20201090

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Pluim, B. M., Loeffen, F. G. J., Clarsen, B., Bahr, R., and Verhagen, E. A. L. M. (2016). A one-season prospective study of injuries and illness in elite junior tennis. Scand. J. Med. Sci. Sports. 26, 564–571. doi: 10.1111/sms.12471

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Pluim, B. M., Staal, J. B., Windler, G. E., and Jayanthi, N. (2006). Tennis injuries: occurrence, aetiology, and prevention. Br. J. Sports. Med. 40, 415–423. doi: 10.1136/bjsm.2005.023184

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Rogowski, I., Ducher, G., Brosseau, O., and Hautier, C. (2008). Asymmetry in volume between dominant and nondominant upper limbs in young tennis players. Pediatr. Exerc. Sci. 20, 263–272. doi: 10.1123/pes.20.3.263

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Saccol, M. F., Gracitelli, G. C., da Silva, R. T., Laurino, C. F., Fleury, A. M., Andrade Mdos, S., et al. (2010). Shoulder functional ratio in elite junior tennis players. Phys. Ther. Sport. 11, 8–11. doi: 10.1016/j.ptsp.2009.11.002

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Trakis, J. E., McHugh, M. P., Caracciolo, P. A., Busciacco, L., Mullaney, M., and Nicholas, S. J. (2008). Muscle strength and range of motion in adolescent pitchers with throwing-related pain: implications for injury prevention. Am. J. Sports Med. 36, 2173–2178. doi: 10.1177/0363546508319049

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Whiteley, R. J., Ginn, K. A., Nicholson, L. L., and Adams, R. D. (2009). Sports participation and humeral torsion. J. Orthop. Sports Phys. Ther. 39, 256–263. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2009.2821

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Young, S. W., Dakic, J., Stroia, K., Nguyen, M. L., Harris, A. H., and Safran, M. R. (2015). High incidence of infraspinatus muscle atrophy in elite professional female tennis players. Am. J. Sports Med. 43, 1989–1993. doi: 10.1177/0363546515588177

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: shoulder, hand-held dynamometry, tennis, adolescent, normative database, range of motion, strength

Citation: Johansson F, Asker M, Malmberg A, Fernandez-Fernandez J, Warnqvist A and Cools A (2022) Eccentric and Isometric Shoulder Rotation Strength and Range of Motion: Normative Values for Adolescent Competitive Tennis Players. Front. Sports Act. Living 4:798255. doi: 10.3389/fspor.2022.798255

Received: 19 October 2021; Accepted: 10 January 2022;
Published: 17 February 2022.

Edited by:

John J. McMahon, University of Salford, United Kingdom

Reviewed by:

Nicholas Joel Ripley, University of Salford, United Kingdom
Nejc Sarabon, University of Primorska, Slovenia

Copyright © 2022 Johansson, Asker, Malmberg, Fernandez-Fernandez, Warnqvist and Cools. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Fredrik Johansson, fredrik.johansson@shh.se

Download