An Ir(III) Complex Photosensitizer With Strong Visible Light Absorption for Photocatalytic CO₂ Reduction

Abstract

A cyclometalated iridium(III) complex having 2-(pyren-1-yl)-4-methylquinoline ligands [Ir(pyr)] has a strong absorption band in the visible region (ε_444nm = 67,000 M⁻¹ cm⁻¹) but does not act as a photosensitizer for photochemical reduction reactions in the presence of triethylamine as an electron donor. Here, 1,3-dimethyl-2-(o-hydroxyphenyl)-2,3-dihydro-1H-benzo[d]imidazole (BI(OH)H) was used instead of the amine, demonstrating that BI(OH)H efficiently quenched the excited state of Ir(pyr) and can undergo the photochemical carbon dioxide (CO₂) reduction catalyzed by trans(Cl)-Ru(dmb)(CO)₂Cl₂ (dmb = 4,4′-dimethyl-2,2′-bipyridine, Ru) to produce formate as the main product. We also synthesized a binuclear complex combining Ir(pyr) and Ruvia an ethylene bridge and investigated its photochemical CO₂ reduction activity in the presence of BI(OH)H.

Introduction

Today, the consumption of fossil resources releases a tremendous amount of carbon dioxide (CO₂), which has had a serious impact on global climate change. The reduction in fossil resources in the future will induce shortages in both energy and carbon sources. To resolve these serious problems, the development of alternative energy systems that produce reduced volumes of CO₂ by using solar light as an energy source is desirable. To utilize a wider range of visible light from the sun, nature-inspired artificial Z-scheme systems have been developed by using semiconductors modified with metal complexes (Sato et al., 2011; Sekizawa et al., 2013; Kuriki et al., 2016, 2017; Sahara et al., 2016; Kumagai et al., 2017). Some metal complex photocatalytic systems that consist of a photosensitizer (PS) and a catalyst (CAT) can selectively induce CO₂ reduction and suppress hydrogen (H₂) evolution. These systems require a sacrificial electron donor due to the relatively low oxidation power of the PS unit in the excited state (Yamazaki et al., 2015; Tamaki and Ishitani, 2017; Kuramochi et al., 2018a) Step-by-step excitation of both the semiconductor and the metal complex produces an electron with high reducing power and a hole with high oxidizing power, allowing for CO₂ reduction by weaker electron donors such as methanol (Figure 1; Sekizawa et al., 2013).

Figure 1

2013).

Ru(II) tris-diimine complexes [Ru(N^∧N)₃]²⁺ have been frequently used as the PS unit of supramolecular photocatalysts, which have strong absorption in the visible region, a long lifetime of the ³MLCT excited state, and a stable one-electron reduced state. However, [Ru(N^∧N)₃]²⁺ has a problem in that one of the N^∧N ligands is relatively easily released during the photocatalytic reaction to give [Ru(N^∧N)₂(Solvent)₂]²⁺-type complexes that work as catalysts for CO₂ reduction (Lehn and Ziessel, 1990; Yamazaki et al., 2015; Kuramochi et al., 2018a). In addition, a PS unit with stronger absorption in the visible region compared to [Ru(N^∧N)₃]²⁺ should be more favorable for constructing new photocatalytic systems.

In recent years, cyclometalated iridium(III) complexes, such as Ir(ppy)₃ (ppy = 2-phenylpyridine) and [Ir(ppy)₂(N^∧N)]⁺, have been used as PSs in various photocatalytic reactions, such as H₂ evolution (Goldsmith et al., 2005; Lowry and Bernhard, 2006), CO₂ reduction (Thoi et al., 2013; Bonin et al., 2014; Chen et al., 2015; Rao et al., 2017, 2018), and organic synthesis (Figure 2; Prier et al., 2013; Schultz and Yoon, 2014; Shaw et al., 2016), even though the absorption by Ir(ppy)₃ and [Ir(ppy)₂(N^∧N)]⁺ is relatively weak in the visible region. We already reported that [Ir(piq)₂(dmb)]⁺ (piq = 1-phenylisoquinoline, dmb = 4,4′-dimethyl-2,2′-bipyridine), which has a stronger absorption in the visible region (ε_444nm = 7,800 M⁻¹ cm⁻¹) than Ir(ppy)₃, acts as a PS for CO₂ reduction without forming decomposed species that catalyze CO₂ reduction (Figure 2; Kuramochi and Ishitani, 2016). The intense absorption at the longer wavelength allowed for the selective excitation of the PS without exciting the CAT, such as fac-Re(dmb)(CO)₃Br (dmb = 4,4′-dimethyl-2,2′-bipyridine). In addition, the supramolecular photocatalyst, where [Ir(piq)₂(BL)]⁺ (BL = bridging ligand) is connected with fac-Re(BL)(CO)₃Br, works as a better photocatalyst for CO₂ reduction compared to the mixed system of the corresponding mononuclear complexes, i.e., [Ir(piq)₂(dmb)]⁺ and fac-Re(dmb)(CO)₃Br. Although [Ir(piq)₂(dmb)]⁺ has a stronger absorption in the visible region compared to Ir(ppy)₃ and the advantages over [Ru(N^∧N)₃]²⁺ as mentioned above, its absorption in the visible region is weaker than that of [Ru(N^∧N)₃]²⁺. It has been reported that several Ir(III) complexes that have stronger absorption bands in the visible region than [Ru(N^∧N)₃]²⁺ can act as PSs for H₂ evolution (Takizawa et al., 2012, 2014, 2018; Fan et al., 2014). Fan et al. reported that an Ir(III) complex with 2-(pyren-1-yl)-4-methylquinoline ligands [Ir(pyr), Figure 2] showed a very strong absorption band in the visible region, ε(450 nm) > 60,000 M⁻¹ cm⁻¹. Unfortunately, it could not photocatalyze H₂ evolution using K₂PtCl₄ as CAT in the presence of triethylamine (TEA). This inactivity was explained by the lack of photoinduced electron transfer from TEA to the excited state of Ir(pyr), as the reduction potential of the excited state of Ir(pyr) is less than the oxidation potential of TEA (Fan et al., 2014). We reported that the Ru(II)–Ru(II) supramolecular photocatalyst can selectively reduce CO₂ to formic acid (HCOOH) by using 1,3-dimethyl-2-(o-hydroxyphenyl)-2,3-dihydro-1H-benzo[d]imidazole (BI(OH)H) as an electron donor (ED) with a high turnover number (TON_HCOOH) and a high quantum yield (Φ_HCOOH; Tamaki et al., 2015). This photocatalytic reaction does not proceed in the absence of BI(OH)H even if triethanolamine (TEOA), which has a similar oxidation potential to TEA, is used. This is because BI(OH)H has a much stronger reducing power (E = +0.02 V vs. Ag/AgNO₃) (Hasegawa et al., 2006; Elgrishi et al., 2017; Kuramochi et al., 2018a) than TEA (E = +0.67 V vs. Ag/AgNO₃) (Yamazaki et al., 2015; Elgrishi et al., 2017).

Figure 2

Herein, we report the successful use of Ir(pyr) as a PS for CO₂ reduction by using BI(OH)H as ED and trans(Cl)-Ru(dmb)(CO)₂Cl₂ (Ru) as CAT. We also synthesized a supramolecular photocatalyst from Ir(pyr) (Ir(pyr)–Ru; Scheme 1) and investigated its photocatalytic activity for CO₂ reduction.

Scheme 1

Results and Discussion

Synthesis of the Binuclear Complex, Ir(pyr)–Ru

Ir(pyr)–Ru was synthesized according to Scheme 1. The di-μ-chloride-iridium dimer (Fan et al., 2014) was reacted with AgPF₆ in acetonitrile to give the mononuclear acetonitrile–iridium complex. This complex was reacted with 1,2-bis(4′-methyl-[2,2′-bipyridin]-4-yl)ethane (BL), and the crude product was isolated using a silica gel column giving [Ir(pyr-mq)₂(BL)](PF₆) in 43% yield, based on the acetonitrile–iridium complex. This was reacted with [Ru(CO)₂Cl₂]_n, which was pretreated by refluxing in the solvent (Kuramochi et al., 2015), giving the desired binuclear complex Ir(pyr)–Ru as a PF₆ salt in 87% yield.

Photophysical and Electrochemical Properties

Fan et al. reported the photophysical and electrochemical properties of Ir(pyr) in dichloromethane or tetrahydrofuran (Fan et al., 2014). Since these solvents are less polar than the solvents suitable for CO₂ reduction, such as N,N-dimethylacetamide (DMA), we measured the photophysical and electrochemical properties of Ir(pyr) in DMA (Kuramochi et al., 2014). Figure 3 shows the ultraviolet–visible (UV–vis) absorption spectrum of Ir(pyr) in DMA, which shows a much stronger absorption in the visible region (ε_444nm = 67,000 M⁻¹ cm⁻¹) compared to [Ir(piq)₂(dmb)]⁺ and [Ru(dmb)₃]²⁺. According to the time-dependent density functional theory (TD-DFT) calculation of the UV–vis spectrum of Ir(pyr) in DMA (Figure 4, red bars), the strong absorption band at 444 nm is due to the transitions from the highest occupied molecular orbital (HOMO)-1 to the lowest unoccupied molecular orbital (LUMO)+2 and from HOMO to LUMO+1, which correspond to the π−π^* transitions of the pyrene moieties. The absorption at a wavelength >500 nm is assigned to the transition from HOMO-1 to LUMO and corresponds to the transition from the interligand transition from the dmb to the pyrene moieties and might include some contribution from the singlet–triplet transitions, as described in the literature (Fan et al., 2014). The emission spectrum of Ir(pyr) in DMA is shown in Figure 4, and the Franck–Condon line-shape analysis (Figure S1) gave a 0–0 band energy gap of 14,500 cm⁻¹ for Ir(pyr), which is lower than that for [Ir(piq)₂(dmb)]⁺ (16,950 cm⁻¹) (Kuramochi and Ishitani, 2016).

Figure 3

Figure 4

The redox potentials of Ir(pyr) in DMA were obtained by cyclic voltammetry (CV; Figure S2) and differential pulse voltammetry (DPV) and are summarized in Table 1 together with those of [Ir(piq)₂(dmb)]⁺ and Ru (Kuramochi and Ishitani, 2016; Kuramochi et al., 2018b). The oxidation waves of the Ir complexes were measured in acetonitrile due to its wide-potential window. The CV showed three each of reversible cathodic and irreversible anodic waves, indicating that Ir(pyr) is stable against reduction but relatively unstable to oxidation on the CV timescale. According to the DFT calculation, the LUMO mainly distributes across the dmb ligand of Ir(pyr) (Figure 4). Thus, it is expected that the first electron is injected into the dmb ligand, which benefits the electron transfer from the one-electron reduced species of Ir(pyr) to the Ru moiety. This property has been previously observed in [Ir(piq)₂(dmb)]⁺ (Kuramochi and Ishitani, 2016).

Emission Quenching by Electron Donors

The emission intensity of Ir(pyr)–Ru was similar to that of Ir(pyr), suggesting that oxidative quenching of the excited state of the Ir unit by the Ru unit does not proceed in Ir(pyr)–Ru. This is reasonable because the oxidative quenching process is endothermic; the oxidation potential of the excited state of Ir(pyr) is much more positive (−0.96 V; Table 1) than the reduction potential of Ru (−1.66 V).

Emission quenching of Ir(pyr) by 1-benzyl-1,4-dihydronicotinamide (BNAH) was inefficient: Stern–Volmer constant (K_SV) = 13 M⁻¹ in DMA. Assuming that the emission lifetime is 3.1 μs (Fan et al., 2014), the quenching rate constant (k_q) was estimated to be 4.2 × 10⁶ M⁻¹ s⁻¹. When a stronger electron donor, BI(OH)H (Hasegawa et al., 2006; Tamaki et al., 2015), was used, the emission of Ir(pyr) was more efficiently quenched (Figure 5); K_SV reached 3,000 M⁻¹ in DMA/TEOA (5:1 v/v), and k_q was 9.7 × 10⁸ M⁻¹ s⁻¹, which is close to the diffusion-controlled rate constant (Tamaki et al., 2013). The K_SV of Ir(pyr)–Ru by BI(OH)H was 2,800 M⁻¹, which is similar to that of Ir(pyr). In previous work by Fan et al. (2014), Ir(pyr) did not work as a PS for H₂ evolution because the emission from Ir(pyr) was not quenched by TEA. This emission is not quenched by TEOA as well because TEOA has a similar oxidation potential to TEA. Conversely, BI(OH)H significantly quenches the emission from Ir(pyr), indicating efficient electron transfer from BI(OH)H to the excited Ir(pyr).

Figure 5

Photocatalytic CO₂ Reduction

DMA-TEOA (5:1 v/v) mixed solutions containing both Ir(pyr) and Ru or Ir(pyr)–Ru (0.05 mM) as the photocatalysts and BI(OH)H as the ED were irradiated at λ_ex > 480 nm under a CO₂ atmosphere. In both cases, HCOOH was mainly detected with small amounts of CO and H₂. Figure 6 shows the time profiles of product formation during the photocatalytic reaction. Blank experiments in the absence of the Ru catalyst produced trace amounts of CO (3.9 μmol) and formate (7.6 μmol) after 24 h. From the Stern–Volmer constants, the quenching efficiencies of the excited states of Ir(pyr) and Ir(pyr)–Ru by 0.1 M BI(OH)H were estimated as η_q > 99%, indicating that the excited states of Ir(pyr) and Ir(pyr)–Ru were almost completely quenched by BI(OH)H under these reaction conditions. Figure 6 shows that Ir(pyr) does work as a PS for CO₂ reduction when using BI(OH)H. The time profiles for the mixture of Ir(pyr) and Ru showed a linear increase reaching a TON_HCOOH = ~2,000 during 24-h irradiation, indicating that Ir(pyr) has a high durability during photocatalytic CO₂ reduction. Although Ir(pyr)–Ru also worked as a photocatalyst for CO₂ reduction, it showed a lower activity compared to the mixture of Ir(pyr) and Ru. While the initial formation rates of the products were similar, the reaction stopped after just 5 h of irradiation in the case of Ir(pyr)–Ru. Because the reaction solution of Ir(pyr)–Ru was decolorized during the photocatalytic reaction, the low activity of Ir(pyr)–Ru would result from its low durability. The decoloration was also observed in irradiation experiments of [Ir(piq)₂(dmb)]⁺ and ED without the CAT because of hydrogenation of the ligands in [Ir(piq)₂(dmb)]⁺ (Kuramochi and Ishitani, 2016). Thus, it is also expected that the decoloration of Ir(pyr)–Ru is caused by hydrogenation of the Ir unit. In Ir(pyr)–Ru, the accumulated electron(s) might be stabilized because of electron hopping between the Ir and Ru units, which might be enhanced by the hydrogenation of the Ir unit.

Figure 6

Figure 7 illustrates the time profiles of the products during the irradiation of CO₂-saturated DMA/TEOA (5:1 v/v, 2.0 ml) solutions containing Ir(pyr) or [Ru(dmb)₃]²⁺ as PS in the presence of trans-Ru(bpy)(CO)₂Cl₂ (bpy = 2,2-bipyridine) and BI(OH)H as CAT and ED, respectively. The initial formation rate of HCOOH in the system using Ir(pyr) (Figure 7A) is slower than that using [Ru(dmb)₃]²⁺ (Figure 7B), although Ir(pyr) has more intense absorption band at >480 nm than [Ru(dmb)₃]²⁺ (Figure 3). In Figure 7, trans-Ru(bpy)(CO)₂Cl₂ is used instead of Ru. Although trans-Ru(bpy)(CO)₂Cl₂ has a much less negative reduction potential (−1.51 V vs. Ag/AgNO₃; Kuramochi et al., 2015) than Ru (−1.66 V vs. Ag/AgNO₃), the initial formation rate of HCOOH in the system using trans-Ru(bpy)(CO)₂Cl₂ (Figure 7A) is similar to that using Ru (Figure 6A), suggesting that the electron transfer process from the one-electron reduced Ir(pyr) to CAT is not the rate-determining step and does not significantly affect the reaction rate. Considering that the emission of Ir(pyr) is almost completely quenched, the slow initial formation rate of HCOOH in Ir(pyr) would result from the competitive back-electron transfer process soon after the electron transfer from BI(OH)H to the excited state of Ir(pyr) in the solvent cage (Kavarnos, 1993; Nakada et al., 2015).

Figure 7

Conclusion

Photocatalytic CO₂ reduction using Ir(pyr) as PS, which has a strong absorption in the visible region, proceeded efficiently for more than 1 day when a suitable electron donor, BI(OH)H, and Ru were used as CAT. A new supramolecular photocatalyst, Ir(pyr)–Ru, was successfully synthesized, which exhibited a similar reaction rate during the initial stage of CO₂ reduction to that of the mixed system, but the durability of Ir(pyr)–Ru was lower than that of the mixed system. While Ir(pyr) showed high durability in the mixed system, the initial formation rate of HCOOH tended to be slower than that of the catalytic system using [Ru(dmb)₃]²⁺ as PS, which is possibly due to the faster back-electron transfer from the reduced Ir(pyr) to the oxidized BI(OH)H.

Experimental Section

General Procedure

All chemicals and solvents were of commercial reagent quality and were used without further purification unless otherwise stated. DMA was dried over molecular sieves of size 4 Å and distilled under reduced pressure. TEOA was distilled under reduced pressure. Tetraethylammonium tetrafluoroborate was dried in vacuo at 100°C overnight before use. [Ir(piq)₂(BL)](PF₆) (Kuramochi and Ishitani, 2016), BNAH (Mauzerall and Westheimer, 1955), BI(OH)H (Hasegawa et al., 2005; Zhu et al., 2008), Ru (Anderson et al., 1995), and BL (Sun et al., 1997) were synthesized according to literature procedures. ¹H NMR spectra were recorded on an AL400 NMR spectrometer. IR spectra were measured in dichloromethane on a JASCO FT/IR-610 spectrometer. Electrospray ionization–mass spectroscopy (ESI-MS) was undertaken using a SHIMADZU LCMS-2010A system with acetonitrile as a mobile phase. UV–vis absorption spectra were recorded with a JASCO V-670 instrument. Emission spectra were measured at 25°C under an Ar atmosphere using a JASCO FP-8600 spectrofluorometer with correlation for the detector sensitivity. Emission quenching experiments were performed in DMA or DMA/TEOA (5:1 v/v) solutions containing a complex and several different concentrations of BNAH or BI(OH)H.

Emission Spectral Fitting

Double-mode Franck–Condon band shape analysis was used to fit the emission spectra. The spectral fittings were carried out according to the following equation (Caspar et al., 1984) using the Wavemetrics Igor software.

I(ν) is the relative emission intensity at frequency ν. E₀₀ is the energy gap between the zeroth vibrational levels in the ground and excited states, n₁ and n₂ are the vibrational quantum numbers of the high- and low-frequency vibrational modes, respectively, S₁ and S₂ are the Huang–Rhys factors, and ν_1/2 is the half-width at half-maximum (fwhm) of the individual vibronic band. The 0–0 band energy gaps between the lowest excited state and the ground state were obtained from the emission spectral fitting (Figure S1).

[Ir(pyr-mq)₂(CH₃CN)₂](PF₆)

[(pyr-mq)₂Ir-μ-Cl]₂ (100 mg, 5.4 × 10⁻⁵ mol), AgPF₄ (31 mg, 1.2 × 10⁻⁴ mol), and acetonitrile (10 ml) were placed in a 50-ml flask. The mixture was stirred for 4 h at room temperature. The resulting suspension was filtered through Celite pad to remove AgCl. The filtrate was concentrated to ca. 1 ml, and the product was precipitated by the addition of diethyl ether (10 ml). After cooling the suspension for 30 min at 0°C, the product was collected by filtration, giving 96 mg (80%) of the titled compound as a dark orange solid: ¹H NMR (CDCl₃, 400 MHz) δ 9.18 (brs, 2H), 8.73 (d, J = 8.8 Hz, 2H), 8.56 (s, 2H), 8.23 (d, J = 7.2 Hz, 2H), 8.15–7.95 (m, 8H), 7.85–7.70 (m, 6H), 7.27 (m, 2H), 6.40 (brs, 2H), 3.23 (s, 6H), 2.22 (s, 6H, CH₃CN).

[Ir(pyr-mq)₂(BL)](PF₆)

The bridging ligand (BL, 80 mg, 2.2 × 10⁻⁴ mol), dichloromethane (40 ml), and methanol (20 ml) were placed in a 100-ml flask, and the system was purged with argon gas. A solution of [Ir(pyr-mq)₂(CH₃CN)₂](PF₆) (80 mg, 7.3 × 10⁻⁵ mol) in dichloromethane (10 ml) and methanol (5 ml) was then added dropwise at room temperature. The reaction mixture was stirred at room temperature. The reaction progress was monitored with ESI-MS. After stirring for 48 h, the resulting solution was evaporated. The residue was purified with a silica gel column (1 to 2 vol% methanol in dichloromethane). The second red band eluted with 2 vol% methanol was collected and evaporated to dryness, giving 42 mg (43% based on the iridium precursor) of the titled complex as a dark red solid: ESI-MS m/z: 1,243 ([M–PF]⁺). ¹H NMR (CDCl₃, 400 MHz) δ 8.94 (brs, 1H), 8.92 (brs, 1H), 8.60 (d, J = 2.8 Hz, 2H), 8.51 (d, J = 5.2 Hz, 1H), 8.45 (d, J = 5.2 Hz, 1H), 8.24–8.12 (m, 8H), 8.02 (s, 1H), 8.00 (s, 1H), 7.91–7.76 (m, 8H), 7.58 (s, 2H), 7.52–7.38 (m, 5H), 7.35 (m, 1H), 7.25–7.21 (m, 1H), 7.09 (d, J = 4.4 Hz, 1H), 6.99–6.88 (m, 3H), 6.77 (m, 1H), 3.13–3.00 (m, 4H), 2.97 (s, 3H), 2.95 (s, 3H), 2.45 (s, 3H), 2.42 (s, 3H).

Ir(pyr)–Ru

An acetone/ethenol (1:2 v/v) mixed solution (6 ml) containing [Ru(CO)₂Cl₂]_n (9.9 mg, 4.3 × 10⁻⁵/n mol) was refluxed for 1 h, and then [Ir(pyr-mq)₂(BL)](PF₆) (30 mg, 2.2 × 10⁻⁵ mol) was added to it. The reaction mixture was heated to 60°C and stirred for 4.5 h under Ar atmosphere. As the reaction proceeded, the starting red solution became a red suspension. The resulting solid was filtered and washed with ethanol. The solid was dissolved in dichloromethane (ca. 2 ml) and filtered to remove insoluble materials. The solution was evaporated to afford 30 mg (87%) of the titiled compound as a dark red solid. ESI-MS m/z: 1,471 ([M–PF]⁺). FT-IR ν_CO/cm⁻¹: 1,992, 2,058. Anal. calcd (%) for C₇₈H₅₄Cl₂F₆IrN₆O₂PRu· 3H₂O: C, 56.08; N, 5.03; H, 3.62. Found (%): C, 55.88; N, 4.81; H, 3.21. ¹H NMR (CDCl₃, 400 MHz) δ 8.97–8.88 (m, 4H), 8.74 (brs, 1H), 8.65–8.62 (m, 3H), 8.42 (brs, 1H), 8.30 (brs, 1H), 8.25–8.21 (m, 2H), 8.18–8.15 (m, 2H), 8.03–8.01 (m, 2H), 7.96–7.79 (m, 8H), 7.61 (s, 1H), 7.56 (s, 1H), 7.53–7.49 (m, 2H), 7.45–7.40 (m, 4H), 7.36 (m, 1H), 7.28–7.24 (m, 1H), 7.09 (d, J = 5.6 Hz, 1H), 6.98–6.88 (m, 3H), 3.05–2.94 (m, 4H), 2.99 (s, 3H), 2.98 (s, 3H), 2.61 (s, 3H), 2.47 (s, 3H).

Photocatalytic CO₂ Reduction

DMA-TEOA (2 ml; 5:1 v/v) solutions containing a mixture of PS and CAT or the supramolecular Ir(pyr)–Ru complex and BI(OH)H were bubbled with CO₂ for 30 min. Photo-irradiations were carried out in 11-mL Pyrex tubes (i.d. = 8 mm) with light at λ > 480 nm using a 500-W high-pressure Hg lamp combined with a K₂CrO₄ solution filter (30% w/w, optical path length: 1 cm) using a merry-go-round apparatus. The reaction temperature was maintained at 25°C using an IWAKI constant-temperature system (CTS-134A). The gaseous reaction products (CO and H₂) were quantified with GC-TCD (GL Science GC323), and the product (formate) in the solutions was analyzed with a capillary electrophoresis system (Otuka Electronics Co.CAPI-3300I).

Computational Methods

DFT calculations were carried out using the Gaussian 09 package of programs (Frisch et al., 2009). Each structure was fully optimized using the B3LYP functional using the 6-31G(d,p) basis set for all atoms except Ir and the standard double-ζ type LANL2DZ basis set with the effective core potential of Hay–Wadt for Ir. The calculation was carried out by using the polarizable continuum model (PCM) with default parameter for DMA. The stationary points were verified using the vibrational analysis.

References

• 1

  AndersonP. A.DeaconG. B.HaarmannK. H.KeeneF. R.MeyerT. J.ReitsmaD. A.et al. (1995). Designed synthesis of mononuclear Tris(heteroleptic) ruthenium complexes containing bidentate polypyridyl ligands. Inorg. Chem.34, 6145–6157. 10.1021/ic00128a028

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 2

  BoninJ.RobertM.RoutierM. (2014). Selective and efficient photocatalytic CO₂ reduction to CO using visible light and an iron-based homogeneous catalyst. J. Am. Chem. Soc.136, 16768–16771. 10.1021/ja510290t

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 3

  CasparJ. V.WestmorelandT. D.AllenG. H.BradleyP. G.MeyerT. J.WoodruffW. H. (1984). Molecular and electronic structure in the metal-to-ligand charge-transfer excited states of d6 transition-metal complexes in solution. J. Am. Chem. Soc.106, 3492–3500. 10.1021/ja00324a017

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 4

  ChenL.GuoZ.WeiX.-G.GallenkampC.BoninJ.Anxolabéhère-MallartE.et al. (2015). Molecular catalysis of the electrochemical and photochemical reduction of CO₂ with earth-abundant metal complexes. selective production of CO vs HCOOH by switching of the metal center. J. Am. Chem. Soc.137, 10918–10921. 10.1021/jacs.5b06535

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 5

  ElgrishiN.ChambersM. B.WangX.FontecaveM. (2017). Molecular polypyridine-based metal complexes as catalysts for the reduction of CO_2.Chem. Soc. Rev.46, 761–796. 10.1039/C5CS00391A

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 6

  FanS.ZongX.ShawP. E.WangX.GengY.SmithA. R.et al. (2014). Energetic requirements of iridium(III) complex based photosensitisers in photocatalytic hydrogen generation. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys.16, 21577–21585. 10.1039/C4CP02997F

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 7

  FrischM. J.TrucksG. W.SchlegelH. B.ScuseriaG. E.RobbM. A.CheesemanJ. R.et al. (2009). Gaussian 09, Revision D.01. Wallingford, CT.

  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 8

  GoldsmithJ. I.HudsonW. R.LowryM. S.AndersonT. H.BernhardS. (2005). Discovery and high-throughput screening of heteroleptic iridium complexes for photoinduced hydrogen production. J. Am. Chem. Soc.127, 7502–7510. 10.1021/ja0427101

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 9

  HasegawaE.SeidaT.ChibaN.TakahashiT.IkedaH. (2005). Contrastive photoreduction pathways of benzophenones governed by regiospecific deprotonation of imidazoline radical cations and additive effects. J. Org. Chem.70, 9632–9635. 10.1021/jo0514220

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 10

  HasegawaE.TakizawaS.SeidaT.YamaguchiA.YamaguchiN.ChibaN.et al. (2006). Photoinduced electron-transfer systems consisting of electron-donating pyrenes or anthracenes and benzimidazolines for reductive transformation of carbonyl compounds. Tetrahedron62, 6581–6588. 10.1016/j.tet.2006.03.061

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 11

  KavarnosG. J. (1993). Fundamentals of Photoinduced Electron Transfer (Weinheim: VCH).

  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 12

  KumagaiH.SaharaG.MaedaK.HigashiM.AbeR.IshitaniO. (2017). Hybrid photocathode consisting of a CuGaO₂ p-type semiconductor and a Ru(II)–Re(I) supramolecular photocatalyst: non-biased visible-light-driven CO₂ reduction with water oxidation. Chem. Sci.8, 4242–4249. 10.1039/C7SC00940B

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 13

  KuramochiY.FukayaK.YoshidaM.IshidaH. (2015). trans-(Cl)-[Ru(5,5′-diamide-2,2′-bipyridine)(CO)₂Cl₂]: synthesis, structure, and photocatalytic CO₂ reduction activity. Chem. Eur. J.21, 10049–10060. 10.1002/chem.201500782

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 14

  KuramochiY.IshitaniO. (2016). Iridium(III) 1-phenylisoquinoline complexes as a photosensitizer for photocatalytic CO₂ reduction: a mixed system with a Re(I) catalyst and a supramolecular photocatalyst. Inorg. Chem.55, 5702–5709. 10.1021/acs.inorgchem.6b00777

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 15

  KuramochiY.IshitaniO.IshidaH. (2018a). Reaction mechanisms of catalytic photochemical CO₂ reduction using Re(I) and Ru(II) complexes. Coord. Chem. Rev.373, 333–356. 10.1016/j.ccr.2017.11.023

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 16

  KuramochiY.ItabashiJ.ToyamaM.IshidaH. (2018b). Photochemical CO2 reduction catalyzed by trans(Cl)-[Ru(2,2′-bipyridine)(CO)2Cl2] bearing two methyl groups at 4,4′-, 5,5′- or 6,6′-positions in the ligand. ChemPhotoChem2, 314–322. 10.1002/cptc.201700201

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 17

  KuramochiY.KamiyaM.IshidaH. (2014). Photocatalytic CO₂ reduction in N,N-dimethylacetamide/water as an alternative solvent system. Inorg. Chem.53, 3326–3332. 10.1021/ic500050q

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 18

  KurikiR.MatsunagaH.NakashimaT.WadaK.YamakataA.IshitaniO.et al. (2016). Nature-inspired, highly durable CO₂ reduction system consisting of a binuclear ruthenium(II) complex and an organic semiconductor using visible light. J. Am. Chem. Soc.138, 5159–5170. 10.1021/jacs.6b01997

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 19

  KurikiR.YamamotoM.HiguchiK.YamamotoY.AkatsukaM.LuD.et al. (2017). Robust binding between carbon nitride nanosheets and a binuclear ruthenium (II) complex enabling durable, selective CO₂ reduction under visible light in Aqueous solution. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.56, 4867–4871. 10.1002/anie.201701627

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 20

  LehnJ.-M.ZiesselR. (1990). Photochemical reduction of carbon dioxide to formate catalyzed by 2,2t-bipyridine- or 1,10-phenanthroline-ruthenium(II) complexes. J. Organomet. Chem.382, 157–173. 10.1016/0022-328X(90)85224-M

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 21

  LowryM. S.BernhardS. (2006). Synthetically tailored excited states: phosphorescent, cyclometalated iridium(III) complexes and their applications. Chem. Eur. J.12, 7970–7977. 10.1002/chem.200600618

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 22

  MauzerallD.WestheimerF. (1955). 1-benzyldihydronicotinamide—a model for reduced DPN. J. Am. Chem. Soc.77, 2261–2264. 10.1021/ja01613a070

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 23

  NakadaA.KoikeK.NakashimaT.MorimotoT.IshitaniO. (2015). Photocatalytic CO₂ reduction to formic acid using a Ru(II)–Re(I) supramolecular complex in an aqueous solution. Inorg. Chem.54, 1800–1807. 10.1021/ic502707t

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 24

  PrierC. K.RankicD. A.MacMillanD. W. C. (2013). Visible light photoredox catalysis with transition metal complexes: applications in organic synthesis. Chem. Rev.113, 5322–5363. 10.1021/cr300503r

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 25

  RaoH.BoninJ.RoberM. (2018). Toward visible-light photochemical CO₂-to-CH₄ conversion in aqueous solutions using sensitized molecular catalysis. J. Phys. Chem. C122, 13834–13839. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.8b00950

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 26

  RaoH.SchmidtL. C.BoninJ.RobertM. (2017). Visible-light-driven methane formation from CO₂ with a molecular iron catalyst. Nature548, 74–77. 10.1038/nature23016

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 27

  SaharaG.KumagaiH.MaedaK.KaefferN.ArteroV.HigashiM.et al. (2016). Photoelectrochemical reduction of CO₂ coupled to water oxidation using a photocathode with a Ru(II)–Re(I) complex photocatalyst and a CoO_x/TaON photoanode. J. Am. Chem. Soc.138, 14152–14158. 10.1021/jacs.6b09212

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 28

  SatoS.AraiT.MorikawaT.UemuraK.SuzukiT. M.TanakaH.et al. (2011). Selective CO₂ conversion to formate conjugated with H₂O oxidation utilizing semiconductor/complex hybrid photocatalysts. J. Am. Chem. Soc.133, 15240–15243. 10.1021/ja204881d

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 29

  SchultzD. M.YoonT. P. (2014). Solar synthesis: prospects in visible light photocatalysis. Science343:1239176. 10.1126/science.1239176

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 30

  SekizawaK.MaedaK.DomenK.KoikeK.IshitaniO. (2013). Artificial Z-scheme constructed with a supramolecular metal complex and semiconductor for the photocatalytic reduction of CO₂. J. Am. Chem. Soc.135, 4596–4599. 10.1021/ja311541a

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 31

  ShawM. H.TwiltonJ.MacMillanD. W. (2016). Photoredox catalysis in organic chemistry. J. Org. Chem.81, 6898–6926. 10.1021/acs.joc.6b01449

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 32

  SunL.BerglundH.DavydovR.NorrbyT.HammarstroemL.KorallP.et al. (1997). Binuclear ruthenium–manganese complexes as simple artificial models for photosystem II in green plants. J. Am. Chem. Soc.119, 6996–7004. 10.1021/ja962511k

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 33

  TakizawaS.KanoR.IkutaN.MurataS. (2018). An anionic iridium(III) complex as a visible-light absorbing photosensitizer. Dalton Trans.47, 11041–11046. 10.1039/C8DT02477D

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 34

  TakizawaS.Pérez-BolívarC.AnzenbacherP.Jr.MurataS. (2012). Cationic iridium complexes coordinated with coumarin dyes – sensitizers for visible-light-driven hydrogen generation. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem.2012, 3975–3979. 10.1002/ejic.201200474

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 35

  TakizawaS.ShimadaK.SatoY.MurataS. (2014). Controlling the excited state and photosensitizing property of a 2-(2-Pyridyl)benzo[b]thiophene-based cationic iridium complex through simple chemical modification. Inorg. Chem.53, 2983–2995. 10.1021/ic402778x

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 36

  TamakiY.IshitaniO. (2017). Supramolecular photocatalysts for the reduction of CO_2.ACS Catal.7, 3394–3409. 10.1021/acscatal.7b00440

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 37

  TamakiY.KoikeK.IshitaniO. (2015). Highly efficient, selective, and durable photocatalytic system for CO₂ reduction to formic acid. Chem. Sci.6, 7213–7221. 10.1039/C5SC02018B

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 38

  TamakiY.KoikeK.MorimotoT.IshitaniO. (2013). Substantial improvement in the efficiency and durability of a photocatalyst for carbon dioxide reduction using a benzoimidazole derivative as an electron donor. J. Catal.304, 22–28. 10.1016/j.jcat.2013.04.002

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 39

  ThoiV. S.KornienkoN.MargaritC. G.YangP.ChangC. J. (2013). Visible-light photoredox catalysis: selective reduction of carbon dioxide to carbon monoxide by a nickel N-heterocyclic carbene-isoquinoline complex. J. Am. Chem. Soc.135, 14413–14424. 10.1021/ja4074003

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 40

  YamazakiY.TakedaH.IshitaniO. (2015). Photocatalytic reduction of CO₂ using metal complexes. J. Photochem. Photobiol. C2015, 106–137. 10.1016/j.jphotochemrev.2015.09.001

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 41

  ZhuX.-Q.ZhangM.-T.YuA.WangC.-H.ChengJ.-P. (2008). Hydride, hydrogen atom, proton, and electron transfer driving forces of various five-membered heterocyclic organic hydrides and their reaction intermediates in acetonitrile. J. Am. Chem. Soc.130, 2501–2516. 10.1021/ja075523m

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article