Electrochemical Detection of Environmental Pollutants Based on Graphene Derivatives: A Review

Abstract

Population-driven socioeconomic urban expansion, industrialization, and intensified modern agricultural practices are interlinked to environmental challenges culminating in compromised water quality due to pollution by toxic, persistent, and bioaccumulative heavy metal ions, pesticides, nitroaromatics, and other emerging pollutants. Considering the detrimental impact of pollutants on human health and ecosystem, their detection in different media including water is paramount. Notably, electrochemical techniques are more appealing owing to their recognized advantages. This research summarizes and evaluates the most recent advances in the electrochemical sensing of environmental pollutants such as heavy metal ions, pesticides, nitroaromatics, and other distinct emerging contaminants. Besides, the review focuses on the application of electrochemical detection of the selected pollutants through analysis of representative reports in the five years from 2016 to 2020. Therefore, the review is intended to contribute insights and guidelines to contemporary progress in specific electrochemical application practices based on graphene derivatives, toward the aforenamed pollutants. Thus, it focused on sensing methods such as cyclic voltammetry, anodic stripping voltammetry, and electrochemical impedance spectroscopy employing different sensing elements incorporating graphene. Moreover, the review also highlighted graphene synthesis pathways, sensor design strategies, and functionalization. Furthermore, the review showed that there is congruence in the literature that functionalized graphene and its derivatives remain as viable modifiers in electrochemical sensing of pollutants. Nonetheless, the study also appraised the absence of literature reports on electrochemical detection of natural organic matter substances like humic acid and fulvic acid using a graphene-based sensor. In reckoning, current challenges related to graphene synthesis and applicability, envisaged opportunities, and future perspectives are outlined.

Introduction

Owing to global socioeconomic growth spurred by exponential population rise, water quality has been gradually depreciating. Expansion in the intricately interrelated developmental spheres of urbanization, industrialization, and agriculture has massively contributed to environmental challenges. Furthermore, inadequate treatment of industrial and municipal waste coupled with compromised austerity in regulatory monitoring of effluent has resulted in the deposition of pollutants into the ecosystem. Apart from that, environmental issues including uncapped pollution and diminished groundwater replenishment due to low rainfall have further exacerbated water scarcity and pollution levels (Zhang et al., 2019b; Perreault et al., 2015; Arfin and Rangari 2018; Su et al., 2018; Priya et al., 2018). Among the pollutants which have generated widespread apprehension are heavy metals (HMs) viz mercury, lead, cadmium, pesticides, and emerging chemical pollutants. Even though some HMs are derived from biogeochemical mechanisms, significant HMs in the aquatic media are derived from anthropogenic operations such as fossil fuel combustion, mining processes, incineration, and release of municipal wastewater. Moreover, pesticides have become an integral part of modern extensive agricultural practices and out/indoor domestic health. Meanwhile, personal care products (PCPs) and endocrine disruptive chemicals originating from pharmaceutical and industrial applications are recognized constituents of emerging pollutants (Lingamdinne et al., 2019; Ullah et al., 2018; Sakthinathan and Chen 2015; Sharma and Bhattacharya 2017; Álvarez-Ruiz and Picó 2020).

Inorganic arsenite and HM ions such as mercury, copper, cadmium, and lead have a detrimental impact on the environment besides the health of mankind on account of their toxic nature, persistence in different media, and disposition to biologically accumulate along the trophic system. Human beings become exposed to these metals through consuming contaminated food and portable water. For instance, trivalent arsenic ions are known to cause impairment of major human organs such as the lungs, the liver, and the reproductive system besides weakening the immune system (Molina et al., 2016; Zuo et al., 2019). These pollutants have detrimental effects including damage to body organs and malfunctioning of hormonal systems. Consequently, there is strong motivation to protect ecosystems through environmental analysis and determination of contaminants (Qu et al., 2013; Hou et al., 2018; Liyuan Wang et al., 2013; Lingamdinne and Koduru 2018; Wang et al., 2020). Currently used spectroscopic, chromatographic, and hyphenated techniques are reliable, sensitive, and precise; however, they have inherent shortcomings including prolonging and tedious sample preparatory steps, less economical, utilization of potentially harmful solvents, and the need for trained and certified operators. Inevitably, these approaches become limited for on-site, instantaneous, and in situ analysis (Molina et al., 2016; He et al., 2018a; Huang et al., 2019a; Wen et al., 2018).

Conversely, electrochemical (EC) approaches are hugely acclaimed to be versatile in the detection of variant natural and anthropogenic pollutants such as HM ions, pesticides, and other substances of concern owing to numerous merits comparative to the conventional laboratory-centralized means. Specifically, EC methods are accredited for their superior sensitivity and discriminatory ability, lowly detection limits, and cost-effectual status. Moreover, their facileness in operation, rapid analytical response, absence of sample pretreatment, technically miniaturized devices, and portable state make them amenable for on-site analysis (Silwana et al., 2016; Bansod et al., 2017; Smith et al., 2019).

Again, EC methods are acknowledged for their short response time, simple preparation procedures which are used, and high target specificity even when analyte concentration is extremely low especially in complex matrices; thus, there is a diminished impact from potentially interfering chemicals (Theyagarajan et al., 2020a; Jerome and Sundramoorthy 2020).

Using bare electrodes during the analysis of contaminants is prone to some drawbacks including electrode passivation, high overpotential of analyte reactions, and slow direct electron transfer (Hang et al., 2019; Lee et al., 2018; He et al., 2019a). Notwithstanding, there are strategies to mitigate against such limitations, thus improving the sensitivity and preciseness of electrodes. Electrode modification is one such approach using metal (oxide) NPs, polymers, and other carbonaceous materials. Notably, modification serves to decrease the overpotential of EC reactions and preconcentrating capability for some analytes, and it culminates in the generation of an electrode-modifier interface which ensures the formation of bridges and pathways to enable electron shuttling to ultimately improve signal amplification (Salih et al., 2016; Krishnan et al., 2019; Jerome and Sundramoorthy 2020). Besides, electrode modifying facilitates the simultaneous covalent immobilization and effectual anchoring of biomolecules on the electrode surface. It also promotes accessing of embedded redox-active sites by mediators while it preserves the enzyme’s original nature and activity (Lawal 2018; Kandaswamy Theyagarajan et al., 2020; Murugan et al., 2020). Among the carbon-based materials are carbon nanotubes and graphenic carbon nanomaterials. For instance, graphene-derived nanomaterials are recognized owing to environmentally friendly synthesis methods; for example, during EC synthesis of graphene, nontoxic solvents are used; comparatively, high yield is obtained and minimum residual defects are formed (Nagarajan and Sundramoorthy 2019). In addition, they have a large specific area-to-volume ratio, conductivity, and fast electron transfer kinetics. Therefore, they have attracted global attention; thus, they are explored in different applications. In particular, graphene-derivatized nanomaterials have become entrenched in applications among others, energy harvesting and storage, and environmental analysis as electrochemical sensors or biosensors (Dideikin and Vul’ 2019; Nagarani et al., 2018; Dywili et al., 2019; Li et al., 2015; Gumpu et al., 2017).

This review summarizes and evaluates recent advances in the development and application of EC detection of selected environmental pollutants such as HM ions, pesticides, endocrine disruptors, nitroaromatics, and other pollutants of concern, all based on graphene derivative platforms. Graphene and its derivative synthesis methods and functionalization are briefly outlined. Ultimately, confronting issues, ensuing opportunities, and prospects are further discussed. The review evaluated representative published reports available through the Internet, on the respective subject in the five years from 2016 to 2020, and in the process, more than 200 reports were examined. The review has been organized into sections which include EC techniques, graphene and its derivatives synthesis approaches, and functionalization of graphene-based materials. Further sections focused on application in EC sensing of diverse environmental pollutants, HM ions, pesticides, emerging contaminants, natural organic matter, nitroaromatic compounds, and other pollutants of interest, all with relevant examples to illustrate contemporary progress. Figure 1 summarizes the main pollutants and functionalizing materials associated with graphene in this review. The penultimate part is dedicated to challenges, envisaged opportunities, and future perspectives interrelated with the synthesis and application of graphene originating materials.

FIGURE 1

Electrochemical Detection Techniques

Diverse EC techniques are at the disposal of the scientific research and academic community viz impedimetric and voltammetry. The techniques have gained global recognition owing to their advantages such as high sensitivity, facile operation and procedures, cost-effectiveness, and miniaturizable, portable, and hence potential on-site application. In this part, cyclic voltammetry (CV), anodic stripping voltammetry (ASV), and electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) are briefly outlined.

Fundamentally, voltammetry pertains to the applying of potential in an EC cell and consequently measuring the resulting current which is controlled by the mass transport. The applied potential progressively changes with the independent time variable while the current response is a function of the potential but has a linear relation with the earmarked analyte concentration in the bulk sample (Yilong et al., 2015; Silwana et al., 2016; Wongkaew et al., 2019; Banerjee et al., 2020). Contemporarily, voltammetry has been used in sync with other innovative strategies including differential pulse, square wave, and anodic stripping with an acclaimed reputation in sensing various analytes.

ASV is a sensing technique which is reliant on a preconcentration stage when the dissolved HM ions drift from the bulky solution to the bare or modified electrode. Depending on an enabling potential difference, the HM ions are electroreduced generating the elemental metal. The neutral metal adsorbates accumulate on the electrode surface leading to the transferring of mobile charges to the surface modifier (Gęca and Korolczuk 2017; Waheed et al., 2018). Uniquely, when a specific anodizing voltage is applied, the elemental metals are dissolved releasing electrons. Simultaneously, the di/trivalent cations diffuse into the electrolyte while generating an intense voltammetric stripping current even in ultralow metal concentration matrices. Significantly, there exists a direct interrelationship between the rate-determining prior concentration step along with the ensuing stripping current (Lee et al., 2017; Waheed et al., 2018; Shtepliuk and Yakimova 2019; Suherman et al., 2017). The basic steps in ASV and relevant data to be extracted are shown in Figure 2. ASV stands out as a technique of choice associated with its unique sensing capability features like discriminant selectivity, rapid detection period, and elevated sensitivity.

FIGURE 2

Several researchers explored ASV realizing incredible results; typically, Wen et al. fabricated and applied a reduced graphene oxide-manganese dioxide (rGO/MnO₂) nanocomposite doped with nitrogen for GCE modification. Based on CV, EIS, and ASV in the mercuric determination, the enhanced sensor behavior was on account of synergic impact emanating from obtained nanostructured material and doping. Thus, they reported an elevated sensitivity of 72.16 μA μM⁻¹ and a low detection limit of 0.0414 nM within a linear range of 0.01–0.2 µM (Wen et al., 2018).

In a different report, Chimezie et al. produced an rGO and ex situ synthesized magnetite nanocomposite (rGO/Fe₃O₄) for refashioning a screen-printed carbon electrode (SPCE) surface and investigated quantification of arsenite through DPASV and EIS technologies. Enhanced perfomance of EC sensor was achieved at a linear range of 2–300 μg L⁻¹ with low detection limit of 0.10 μg L⁻¹ (S/N = 3) compared to reported limit of quantification (0.33 μg L⁻¹). They accounted for the enrichment of performance through synergistically large active surface centers for electron transfer routes (Chimezie et al., 2017).

In other respects, EIS is an accomplished technique undertaken to determine the impedance whose components, frequency-reliant-resistance, and capacitance of the electrode are preceded by perturbating in alternating current mode. Results of experiments are mathematically evaluated with an equivalent electrical circuit (EEC) and reliably provide quantitative electrochemical data on mass transfer hence reaction rates, electrical conductivity, dielectric constant, and direct electron mobility (Jin and Maduraiveeran 2018; Wongkaew et al., 2019). For example, Manavalan et al. fabricated GO-functionalized ZnO nanostars for SPCE modification. They evaluated the altered electrode through CV, DPV, and EIS for methyl parathion (MP) detection (Manavalan et al., 2020). Remarkable sensor behavior was reported giving a low sensing limit of 1.2 nM and superior sensitivity of 16.5 μA μM⁻¹ cm⁻² over a linear range from 0.03 to 670 µM. Furthermore, the amplified EC sensor properties were aftermath due to the combinational collaborative effect of the materials used as indicated by the raised peak currents and lower charge transfer resistance. Meanwhile, the proposed sensor’s applicability was assessed in real matrices for MP and it proved a viable candidate. Similarly, Zhou et al. constructed graphene nanoplatelets integrated with a noble metal and Au nanoparticles (GNPs-Au NPs) for refashioning a GCE surface. They investigated the determination of trace level bisphenol A (BPA) using CV, DPV, and EIS strategies and applied the sensor to different water matrices. Their findings demonstrated a low detection capping of 0.027 nM spanning a linear function of 5 × 10⁻³–100 µM. More so, the improved sensor properties were attributable to increased electrocatalytic behavior due to synergy between the composite materials (Zou et al., 2019).

EC Sensor Design Platforms

Sensor platforms intended to ensure sufficient selectivity and high sensitivity apart from having long-term shelf life and short response time. Additionally, they ought to be economic in terms of low power needs and cost-effective. Numerous efforts that are based on material chemistry, target analyte reactivity, sensing mechanism, and other factors have been pursued by the scientific community. In this section, the following are presented: sensor design strategies, the role of nanosized materials, graphene derivative platform synthesis, and lastly the functionalization using diverse materials like metal (oxides) NPs, polymers, and organic and inorganic materials.

Design Strategies

The detection behavior of a sensor is responsive to the interaction which occurs at the electrode interface with the targeted chemical species. Primarily, any sensor system has key components like the sensing element, recognition element, and transducer (Jin and Maduraiveeran 2018; Peña-Bahamonde et al., 2018). Thus, the sensor components and interface events influence design strategies. Sensor design strategies are premised on the realization that actual environmental, clinical, food, or security-related samples may be complicated matrices and the earmarked analyte may be present in extremely low concentrations. Therefore, the design promotes superior sensitivity and differentiation and upgraded target specificity while ameliorating nonfouling effects. Notably, some acknowledged design strategies that have been applied solely or in combination include analyte affinity enrichment, enhancement of the surface area, increased catalytic effect, high loading capacity, and amplification of EC signal (Kumar et al., 2019; Hang et al., 2019; Numan et al., 2020; Wongkaew et al., 2019; Moro et al., 2019; Yan et al., 2020a).

The integration of properties of components of sensor configurations has been widely explored with beneficial impact. In one study, Yan et al. constructed a functional sensing configuration deploying Au NPs, ferrocene dendrimer (FcDr), and rGO. The Au NPs/FcDr/rGO nanohybrid was employed to modify GCE and applied in the detection of dichlorvos (Yan, 2020). Remarkably, FcDr is an effectual signaling constituent associated with the strong anchoring on the electrode, electrostatic interaction, and covalent immobilization besides serving as an Fc⁺²/Fc natural redox probe for EC signal (Yan et al., 2020b). The sensing element components Au NPs have excellent electrical conductivity and improve analyte interaction while rGO nanosheets have a large surface area which is conducive for effective loading and dispersion of metallic NPs onto rGO. Therefore, these components have a synergistic effect stimulating the electron transfer process, hence amplifying the EC signal of the Au NPs/FcDr/rGO/GCE sensor. The proposed sensor attained micromolar detection sensitivity for the pesticide analysis.

Similarly, Malakootian, Hamzeh, and Mahmoudi-Moghaddam investigated the modification of carbon paste electrode (CPE) employing a magnetic FeNi₃/CuS/BiOCl NC for concurrent detection of divalent cadmium and lead. The researchers reckoned that the biocompatible and superparamagnetic FeNi₃ promotes electrical communication between electroactive species and electrode surface (Malakootian et al., 2020). Meantime, the stable semiconductor BiOCl has high catalytic activity while CuS possesses electrical conductivity qualities like metals. Thus, there was synergistic aftermath that boosted the electron transfer kinetics, ultimately amplifying the sensor signal. Furthermore, through SWASV, the corresponding detection limit of 0.4 μg L⁻¹ and 0.1 μg L⁻¹ for Cd⁺² and Pb⁺² was reported while the sensor demonstrated viability when its applicability was evaluated in real samples.

Recently, Kaur assembled a novel NC of ErGO-chitosan (CS)-hemoglobin (Hb) coatings (ErGO-CS/Hb) through a green synthesis method prior to modifying a fluorine-tin oxide (FTO) electrode. The ErGO-CS/Hb configured platform was employed in investigating the quantification of MP via SWV and EIS (Kaur et al., 2020). Notably, the immobilization of Hb onto the ErGO-CS matrix ensued a fast charge transfer rate to the embedded electrode center while safeguarding the nativity of the biomolecule. Evidently, there was magnified pesticide affinity attributed to the delocalized π electron system of rGO which initiated robust π-π stacking interaction with MP. Besides, electrostatic interaction and hydrogen bonding promoted firm binding of the pesticide on the modifier surface. The combination of rGO with CS through amide linkage also improved the dispersion during synthesis, producing a stable nanohybrid. Furthermore, rGO possesses a large surface area, superior electrical conductivity, lower background current, and wide EC potential window while Hb has active redox centers and the hydrophobic biopolymer CS endowed with good film-forming ability was synergistically integrated, manifested in excellent sensitivity and selectivity. So, a limit of detection (LOD) of 79.77 nM and sensitivity of 45.77 A cm⁻² µM⁻¹ were attained.

Likewise, Zeng et al. devised a nanohybrid involving Pd nanoflower-decorated 3D CNT-graphene nanosheets (GNSs) network assembled from CNTs and GNSs for modification of an SPE. The sensing element PdNFs-CNTs-GNSs/SPE was engaged for simultaneous sensing of nitroaromatics, p-nitrophenol (4-NP), 1,3-dinitrobenzene (DNB), 1-chloro-2,4-dinitrobenzene (Cl-DNB), 2,4-dinitrotoulene (DNT), 1,3,5-trinitrobenzene (TNB), and trinitrotoluene (TNT). Initially, 1D CNTs were embedded into 2D GNSs to form a native 3D architectural framework instrumental for prohibiting CNTs and GNSs from agglomerating during synthesis (Zeng et al., 2019). Besides, the 3D structure has a large surface area plus numerous electrochemically active surface sites conducive for high loading of functional NMs on itself confirmed by PdNFs being finely dispersed on the porous CNTs-GNSs scaffold. Effectively, synergism between active PdNFs and CNTs-GNSs porous 3D network facilitates electron channeling between the electrode and redox species, hence fostering electrical communication. Furthermore, the unique configuration had superior electrocatalytic activity toward the reduction of nitroaromatics. The sensor achieved detection limits in the nanomolar level, and the proposed portable sensor system demonstrated potential for prompt, in situ, and point-of-analysis assessments.

Functional Nanostructures

Nanostructured materials have the potential to considerably boost the surface area-to-volume ratio and they are endowed with numerous active centers and hence influence the analytical performance of a sensor.

Nanopillars are sharp spiked nanostructures with high antibacterial efficacy whenever bacteria come into contact. Their potency mode is piercing the bacterial cell wall, thus rupturing and damaging the microorganism, Thus, nanopillars are favorable modifier candidates where antimicrobial surfaces are needed (Bhadra et al., 2018; Chen et al., 2020; Canalejas-Tejero et al., 2018).

The central bore of nanoneedles is a critical feature which is exploited in the medical field. The bore serves as a conduit where the desired molecules pass through. So, nanoneedles are useful for the delivery of bioactive molecules into cells, loading of drugs, and delivery of drugs to specific points (Shende et al., 2018).

Nanorods are 1D structures with a diameter between 1 and 100 nm and they are amenable for use in the sensing and medical field. For example, Hang et al. constructed a hierarchically vertical fluorinated graphene/ZnO nanorods plus nanoseeds platform which was employed for H₂O₂ determination. The sensor had increased active surface area and inherent self-cleaning and fouling-proof capabilities which enhanced its analytical performance (Hang et al., 2019).

Nanowires (NWs) are “sticks” with a diameter of less than 100 nm and varying lengths. However, when interconnected, NWs form 2D or 3D conductive independent frameworks that are self-supporting but have an excellent specific surface area. Moreover, NWs have the capability of hosting several structural defects; they are corrosion proof to the reaction conditions and provide the direct charge connectivity between underlying active centers and the electrode surface. Ultimately, NWs improve the electrocatalytic activity and promote signal amplification. For instance, Zhuang et al. designed a sensor premised on 3D nickel oxide NPs, PANI nanowires, and GO. The NiO NP/PANINW/GO matrix was used to modify a GCE and applied for the detection of glucose (Zhuang et al., 2016). The sensing platform exhibited superior electrocatalytic activity while its sensitivity was high (376.22 μA μM⁻¹ cm⁻²) and LOD was in micromolar level. Similarly, nanotubes also serve as conducting channels linking redox sites with the electrode, besides improving the active surface area which forms the bedrock of EC reactions (Kumar et al., 2019; Cho et al., 2020; Zhang et al., 2018a). Theyagarajan et al. fabricated a sensor employing MWCNTs and a functionalized ionic liquid where the horseradish peroxidase was anchored before modifying a GCE (Theyagarajan et al., 2020b). The sensing configuration was evaluated through detection of H₂O₂ and the corresponding sensitivity and linear range were 55.08 μA μM⁻¹ cm⁻² and 0.01–2.07 nM while the LOD was at micromolar level. Furthermore, there were synergism of properties of MWCNTs and functionalized ionic liquid, large surface area, superior electrical conductivity, π–π stacking, covalent immobilization, and accessing of embedded redox sites. Thus, the sensor performance was enhanced.

Graphene Derivative Platforms

The graphene lineage is composed of the pristine precursor graphene and its derivatives inclusive of GO, rGO, and graphene quantum dots (GQDs). Besides, doped graphene is regarded as an offshoot of that family (Zheng et al., 2017; Smith et al., 2019; Thangamuthu et al., 2019). Graphene is a sole layer of an allotrope of carbon with sp²-hybridized carbon atoms hexagonally arrayed into a two-dimensional (2D) honeycombed entity (Ambrosi et al., 2016; El-Shafai et al., 2018; Beitollahi et al., 2019). For more than a decade, the substantial focus has been directed toward this 2D nanomaterial due to its standout features including excellent chemical inertness and remarkable thermal, optical, mechanical-electrical characteristics (Lee et al., 2019c; Lingamdinne and Koduru 2018; Magesa et al., 2019). Moreover, graphene-derived nanomaterials are conferred with the facility that promotes simple functionalization, superior electron transport capability, and enormous specific surface area-to-volume ratio, besides being biocompatible (Huang et al., 2019b; Kuralay et al., 2016; Kumar et al., 2017; Krishnan et al., 2019). There are diverse pathways for the synthesis of graphene derivatives. Moreover, the derivatives are endowed with peculiar properties which enhance the sensing behavior of composite materials.

Synthesis of Graphene

Conveniently, pristine graphene synthesis processes as depicted in Figure 3 are segmented as either bottom-up or top to bottom incorporating the Geim-Novoselov pioneered mechanical cleavage of graphite. Notwithstanding that, the technique is roundly recognized as least suitable for scalable commercial graphene production since it is arduous and has inferior reproducibility (Khan et al., 2015; Yin et al., 2015; Molinari and Argurio 2017; Xu et al., 2017; Tiwari et al., 2018). Meanwhile, other respective methods are described in the literature, including defects-generating aqua-chemical exfoliation (Lee et al., 2019b; Lawal 2018), epitaxial forming of graphene on silicon carbide substrate, and chemical vapor deposition (CVD) (Avouris and Dimitrakopoulos 2012; Suvarnaphaet and Pechprasarn 2017; Ahmad et al., 2018), and thermal exfoliation (Mohan et al., 2018; Rowley-Neale et al., 2018). Furthermore, “unzipping” of CNTs is also considered a viable graphene preparation pathway. Comparatively, electrochemical means are preferred owing to their efficacy, rapidness, facile, and environmentally friendly nature (Ambrosi et al., 2016; Sakthinathan et al., 2016). Nonetheless, it has been ascertained that graphene’s applicability is hindered by agglomeration arising from the conjunction of π–π restacking, physical defects, multiplex sheet thickness, and inferior aqueous dispersion (Khan et al., 2015; Silwana et al., 2016; Sturala et al., 2018; Beitollahi et al., 2019; Pei et al., 2020). Consequentially, there has been consensus in exploring mitigatory strategies such as the primal conversion of graphene to functionalities-rich GO.

FIGURE 3

Jariwala et al., 2011). Copyright 2011, American Scientific Publishers.

Preparation of Graphene Oxide

The principal approaches for GO synthesis are based on (improved/modified) Hummers method where pyrolytic graphite precursor is subjected to strongly oxidizing and acidic conditions prior to sonication (Zaaba et al., 2017; Lee et al., 2019c; Eigler and Hirsch 2014; Chang and Baek 2017). The resultant GO is hydrophilic owing to the abundant presence of oxygen functionalities. Accordingly, GO is endowed with improved solvent dispersibility and a predisposition for architectural modulation through functionalizing nanomaterials (Bahadir and Sezgintürk 2016; Muthoosamy and Manickam, 2017). Literature sources abound with detailed properties and synthesis protocols of GO (Mohan et al., 2018; Feicht et al., 2019; Smith et al., 2019; Wongkaew et al., 2019; Turkaslan and Mihrace, 2020). Nevertheless, the prevalence of the functional moieties imparts GO with insulating properties. Therefore, in attempts to circumvent such GO limitation and partially restore native pristine graphene qualities, rGO is prepared instead (He et al., 2018b).

Synthesis of Reduced Graphene Oxide

Several methods are at the disposal of researchers for the reduction of GO to rGO to restore certain properties to near pristine graphene. Distinctly, the methods are either thermal or chemical in addition to EC. Significantly, the thermal reduction has concurrent merits of elimination of some oxygen-containing domains, besides stimulating reestablishment of defects through rehybridization of carbon atoms (Dideikin and Vul’, 2019; Oliveira and Morais, 2018). Meanwhile, chemical reduction of GO fosters the worthwhile restoration of prototype graphenic structure, although it introduces structural defects. Apart from that, green and soft reduction technologies continue to be attractive. Relatively, thermal reduction is a preferred method while EC reduction is appealing since it promotes tuning of material properties using green route (Cinti and Arduini, 2017; Su et al., 2018). Figure 4 shows the GO reduction mechanism and the progressive change in oxygen functionalities.

FIGURE 4

Khan et al., 2015). Copyright 2015, The Royal Society of Chemistry.

Synthesis of Nitrogen-Doped Graphene

As much as the development of N-doped graphene is concerned, prevalent strategies are variant. Among them are CVD with ammonia gas, nitrogen plasma annealing of graphene, heat conditioning of graphite oxide using melamine, electrically huge energy treatment in ammonia, and hydrothermal tempering involving nitrogen in the form of urea (Lei et al., 2017).

Functionalization

Functionalization with the sole purpose of tuning graphene-based nanomaterial chemicophysical characteristics such as reactivity, electrochemical activity or resistivity, surface energy, and electronic structure has been a subject of research interest for decades. Thus, functionalization has been accomplished either via covalent means or noncovalent interactions. Covalent functionalizing entails the incorporation of variant functionalities onto the graphenic basic structure through attaching by primarily covalent bonds. The incorporation of other entities occurs through the nonmetallic heteroatom replacement of carbon, free radical addition to conjugated bonds, and edge oxygenated moieties reacting with other functional materials. Meanwhile, intermolecular forces viz π-anionic attraction, hydrogen bonding, π–π stacking, van der Waals forces, and hydrophobic interaction are the principal contributors toward noncovalent narrative. A distinctive characteristic of the noncovalent functionalization is that it does not interfere with the graphitic structure while entrenching it with functionalities (Georgakilas et al., 2012; Eigler and Hirsch 2014; Xu et al., 2017; Lawal 2018). Furthermore, graphene is adorned with semiconductor properties despite the absence of bandgap energy. The opening of such a null bandgap is a critical feature of graphene derivatization which enhances target analyte detection (Garg et al., 2014; Talirz et al., 2016; Ould Ne et al., 2017; Sturala et al., 2018). Figure 5 shows the absence of an energy bandgap in pristine graphene which becomes adjustable due to functionalization. Ultimately, the resultant altered product has inherent hybrid and synergistic properties of the initial components which are advantageous while concurrently overshadowing the individual original limitations. Among others, these impactful synergies enhance the electrochemical performance of the sensing system.

FIGURE 5

Garg et al., 2014). Copyright 2014, MDPI.

EC methods have typical drawbacks when utilizing bare electrodes as follows: carbon paste (CP) or glassy carbon (GC) electrodes. Typically, high overpotential and inactivation of the electrode due to the deposition of by-products have been confronted. Notwithstanding, modifying electrode surfaces is an acceptable mitigatory means to counter electrode passivation due to accumulating of reaction by-products and raised overpotential (Hanssen et al., 2016; Campuzano et al., 2019). Electrode surface modification has been accomplished by employing diverse materials. Among them, metal/metal oxide nanoparticles, organic materials including ionic liquids, or carbon nanomaterials especially graphene, SWCNT, or MWCNT have been explored. Other than that, inorganic materials, conducting polymers such as polyaniline (PANI) and heteroatoms doping continue to draw considerable attention of the scientific community owing to numerous merits. Specifically, beneficial synergistic effects that enhance sensor characteristics for the detection of analytes have been realized (Sakthinathan and Chen 2015; Si et al., 2018; Venu et al., 2018). Furthermore, the emanating synergic aftermaths hugely enhance structural morphology and photochemical and electrochemical properties, and the impedance of the electrode surface is diminished while improving preferential accumulation and boosting the electron transport process. Ultimately, the sensor performance regarding sensitivity, selectivity, and stability is improved (Silwana et al., 2016; Bollella et al., 2017; Si et al., 2018). Figure 6 shows a schematic illustration depicting electrode modification by chitosan-Fe(OH)₃ composite (CFC) nanomaterials and the sensing effect.

FIGURE 6

Lalmalsawmi et al., 2020). Copyright 2020, Elsevier.

Application: Electrochemical Detection

Heavy Metal Ions

Uniquely, HM ions can remain in the environment for prolonged timespans since they are not degradable by biological means to form innocuous substances. Furthermore, they are bioavailable and hence have the tendency to be bioaccumulative in the trophic systems and ultimately reach the consumer, the human being. Because of their proclivity to persist in the environment, bioaccumulative disposition, and elevated toxicity (PBT), considerable attention has been directed to HMs based on the detrimental aftermath on ecological systems and the health of the general populace. Even though some HMs such as copper, manganese, nickel, and zinc are an essential trace dietary expectation, exceeding intake levels may have an adverse impact on body functioning. Additionally, when the concentration of some HM ions surpass regulatory limits and there is sufficient exposure to human beings, they may have adverse effects on their health (Stortini et al., 2020). Besides, some HM ions are suspected carcinogens and mutagens. Meanwhile, there have been reports of varying ecological, biota, and human health ramifications due to excessive exposure to some typical metal ions like arsenic, lead, or mercury in parts of the world (Jan et al., 2015; Orr and Bridges 2017; Latif et al., 2018; Pratush 2018; Rehman et al., 2018; Wan et al., 2020). Moreover, their mortal mode is through complications, impairment, or damaging of critical body organs such as liver, reproductive system kidneys, lungs, heart including the central nervous system, and the skin (Zhou et al., 2018; AL-Gahouari et al., 2020; Raril and Manjunatha 2020). Accordingly, for the sake of protecting the environment and for human health safety, timeous detection (and removal) of harmful HM ions surpassing international guideline levels in the media is of critical importance.

Functionalization applying small organic molecules boosts sensor performance. As such, Raril and Manjunatha constructed a novel polyglycine-modified graphene paste electrode (PGMGPE) for simultaneous EC detection of the divalent ions of mercury and lead. The researchers realized the enhancement of redox signal for the HM ions by the polymer-modified electrode attributable to superior electron transfer kinetics, thus affirming that there was considerable electrode surface property change (Raril and Manjunatha 2020). Thereupon, the PGMGPE was assessed and it demonstrated satisfactory electrocatalytic activity, good stability, and wide linearity response coupled with low corresponding Hg (II) and Pb (II) detection limits of 6.6 and 0.8 µM, respectively. Furthermore, they applied the fabricated EC sensor for the determination of the foregoing HM ions in water and blood serum samples where the recovery was commendable.

Numerous research efforts have been explored exploiting the interlinked microporous nature of three-dimensional nanocomposite structures which improves the effectual surface area and reactive sites for collection/accumulation of targeted substances. Likewise, there is a powerful synergism between graphene and the functional material plus smooth charge carrier movement since the interconnected graphenic network provides unimpeded channels enhancing the sensitivity and selectivity of the modified detection system (Yan et al., 2015; Wang et al., 2015; Guan et al., 2018). Distinctively, Shi et al. (2017a) studied a facile electrode alteration based on a 3D graphene network integrated with bismuth nanoparticles toward multiple HMs sensing. Significantly, wide linear ranges of 1–120 μg L⁻¹ for both Cd (II) and Pb (II) with 40–300 μg L⁻¹ for Zn accompanied by LOD of 0.05, 0.02, and 4.0 μg L⁻¹, respectively, were proclaimed. They reckoned that the diminished limits, improved sensitivity, selectivity, and other properties of the proposed sensor were associated with the boosted active metal cations binding sites of the porous graphene framework an enhanced path for charge mobilities and bismuth-graphene intensified conductivity synergy. In another study, Xiao et al. (2016) via a self-assembly method constructed a graphitized mesoporous framework and investigated its potential applicability for on-site sensing of HMs contaminants present in aqueous media. The modified bismuth mesoporous graphene framework Nafion bound (Bi/MGF-Nafion) electrode showed enriched properties such as elevated sensitivity (0.437 and 0.210 μA L µg⁻¹), 0.3 and 0.1 μg L⁻¹ LOD over a broad linear function of 2–70 and 0.5–110 μg L⁻¹ for the divalent cadmium and lead correspondingly. Notably, they deduced that the enhancement in properties was linked to the combinational impact of in situ coated bismuth with adhesive Nafion and the 3D mesoporosity nature, superior electrical conductivity, and raised active surface area of MGF.

Similarly, Al-Gahouari et al. explored the effects of modifying GCE using a 3D nanohybrid of electrochemically (E) rGO combined with MWCNTs. This was done via covalently functionalizing with an amino acid and l-cysteine (ErGO-MWCNTs-L-cys/GCE) and applied the modified electrode in the monodetermination of lead (Pb²⁺) ions in water (AL-Gahouari et al., 2020). The authors reported a linearity span of 0.2–40 μg L⁻¹ and a calculated sensing limit of 0.1 μg L⁻¹ which was recognized to be lower compared to the international standard quantity for portable water. Additionally, by comparison to the bare electrode, the developed sensor system had an upgrade in the electrochemical conductivity, sensitivity, and selectivity which they attributed to synergistic impact among the components ErGO, MWCNTs, and the amino acid. The CV in Figure 7 validates the proffered deduction while the EIS analysis reveals the combinational effect in lowering the resistance at electrode boundary for electron movement, hence, further affirming that altering electrode surface promoted quick electron relaying by the hybridized material. Correspondingly, Priya et al. designed an HM ion sensor by fashioning the surface of GCE using a nanocomposite material fabricated from GO, the functional group rich amino acid l-cysteine, and a biodegradable but compatible natural biopolymer ĸ-carrageenan (Priya et al., 2018). They studied the feasibility of the sensing system employing SWASV and hence revealed a broad linearity range of 5–50 nM with comparably low LOD of 0.58 and 1.08 nM and remarkable sensitivity of 1.39 and 1.32 μA nM⁻¹ for the divalent Cd and Pb, respectively. Furthermore, they ascribed these enhanced characteristics of the modified sensor to the combinational effects of high surface area and functionalized edges of GO, the chelation capacity of the multifunctional amino acid, and the active adsorptive binding of carrageenan toward the HM ions.

FIGURE 7

AL-Gahouari et al., 2020). Copyright 2020, Frontiers Media S.A.

Recently, Baghayeri et al. investigated a solvothermally produced graphene-zinc metal-organic framework (G/MOF) platform for arsenic (III) determination. The researchers ascribed the enriched As (III) sensing sensitivity to a fruitful synergistic relationship between the mechanically strong large surface area of graphene and the microporous rich network MOF giving a large active surface area. More significantly, they achieved a detection limit of 0.06 ppb which is more than a hundred times less than the internationally set value while a broad linear span of 0.2–25 ppb was realized demonstrating potential applicability for arsenite detection in real samples (Baghayeri et al., 2020).

Heteroatoms including nitrogen, boron, sulfur, or halogen elements have been incorporated into graphene-derived nanocomposites for modification of electrodes with significant amplifying of properties like electric conduction or electrochemical behavior. Among other contributory factors are the influential dopant-to-carbon electron linkage and the emerging of possible reactive sites for heavy metal ions to accumulate on (Shi et al., 2017b; Guan et al., 2018). Therefore, considerable efforts have been focused on doping of variant nonmetal elements into sensing platforms founded on graphene nanomaterials, exploiting the accruing benefits. For example, Lin et al. designed and investigated a nitrogen-doped laser-engraved graphene electrochemical sensor system using polyaniline, PANI, and polyvinylpyrrolidone, PVP, as the N-doping reagents, for concurrent recognition of lead and cadmium ions employing SWASV (Lin et al., 2018). They attained broad linearity relation in the span from 5 to 380 g L⁻¹ and 0.5–380 g L⁻¹ for the corresponding Cd (II) and Pb (II) with LOD of 1.08 and 0.16 g L⁻¹. These authors further deduced that there was an integrated effect between the dopant’s electron affinity to carbon atoms in the structure and the 3D porous nature of piled graphene layers. Essentially, that raised the effective adsorption surface area, expedited the electron transfer, and ultimately enhanced the electrical conduction, the sensitivity, the response range, and the EC performance of the modified electrode. Figure 8 shows a representative diagram of the fabrication pathway for the N@LEG electrodes.

FIGURE 8

Similarly, Lei et al. (2017) designed a nitrogen-doped graphene-modified electrode for joint EC detection of copper (II) and lead (II) ions in aqueous media. Their findings indicated that the proposed sensor showed satisfactory quality with respect to reproducibility plus resistance to interference by chemically similar moieties. Besides, they recorded a calibration detection range of 0.05–2.5 µM with a respective LOD of 11 and 5 nM for copper and lead. Significantly, the researchers accounted for the enriched sensitivity based on the electron interaction between the nitrogen lone pairs and the carbon delocalized π system and increased active sites.

On the other hand, boron as a doping agent is incorporated in a special electrochemical analyte sensing material, boron-doped diamond (BDD) which is hugely acknowledged owing to its reduced background current (bio)chemical stability and wide potential window (Marton et al., 2019). Correspondingly, Pei et al. exploited the uniqueness of BDD and designed a functional independent and innovative electrode based on a BDD substrate, by growing graphene homogenously in situ in a vacuum at a raised annealing temperature. The manipulated G/self-standing BDD electrode with minimum defects was studied revealing refined qualities comparative to unaltered GSBDD including a lowly charge transfer resistance (Rct) of the electrode (Pei et al., 2020). They further asserted that the modified electrode attained 0.475 μA L μg⁻¹ cm⁻² sensitivity accompanied by a detection limit of 0.21 μg L⁻¹ for lead ions over a spanning linear relation of 1–100 ppb. These boosted properties inclusive of long shelf period were attributed to advantageous collaborative effects of BDD and graphene resulting in increased routes for rapid charge movement. Moreover, this induced an improved active surface area linked to the two-layered graphene manipulation of SBDD, augmented adsorption centers associated with the microporous framework, and upgraded reaction kinetics which is fostered.

Besides nitrogen and boron, fluorine has been recognized as a viable dopant option owing to the higher electronegativity difference with carbon. Such difference potentially prompts increased ionic interaction and spreading of charge densities which stimulate charge transference. Moreover, the presence of the heteroatom causes manipulation of graphene energy gap which ameliorates the conveying of electrons and possible metal-ligand complexing. Subsequently, the synergism promotes the EC performance of the refashioned electrode (Shahzad et al., 2017; Thiruppathi et al., 2017). Accordingly, Thiruppath et al. utilizing CV and SWASV investigated multiple HM ions determination founded on fluorinated GO modified electrode and they reported linear concentration range of 0.6–5.0, 0.3–5.0, and 1.0–6.0 µM for bivalent Cd, Pb, and Hg, respectively. Besides, a recognition limit of 10 nM for both Cd (II) and Pb (II) was submitted and this was confirmation of enrichment of sensor performance shown by peak stripping currents attributable to increased target metal chelation and adsorption centers (Thiruppathi et al., 2017) Table 1.

Pesticides

Although pesticides like organochlorine (OCPs) are an integral feature of modern agricultural practices, they have adverse repercussions on human health and the ecosystem owing to their typical characteristics like toxicity. Accordingly, it is paramount to advance environmental protection through monitoring and determinations. Comparably, EC techniques are more appealing credited to their facile status, short response time, cost-effectiveness, and potential on-site application, besides sensitivity and selectivity (Aragay et al., 2012; Koçak et al., 2015; Capoferri et al., 2018; Ren et al., 2019). Because of their predisposition to persist in an ecosystem accompanied by an inclination to be absorbed by aquatic biota consequently, they bioaccumulate and get magnified along the food trophic system. Further, they are lipophilic and cumulatively collected in fatty tissue of organisms; eventually, they may be consumed by human beings through food and water (Fayemi et al., 2016; Hernandez-Vargas et al., 2018; Zamora-Sequeira et al., 2019). OCP such as chlordane, aldrin, lindane, and dieldrin are recognized to be toxic with severe effects on humans and the ecological system. Recent efforts on lindane detection have utilized one-dimensional graphenic carbon in the form of MWCNTs functionalized with either conducting polymer PANI compared to macrosynthetic organic molecule Nylon 6,6 and various metal oxides. The findings of Fayemi et al., based on EC investigations, showed a lowly limit of concentration recognition of 32.0 nM stretching over a linear relationship ranging from 9.90 pM to 5.0 µM. The boosted sensor properties including magnified sensitivity were ascribed to synergy of the integrated properties of the respective nanofibers, MWCNTs, Nylon 6,6, and magnetic material (Fayemi et al., 2016). Even Boke et al. assembled nanocomposites of graphitic carbon nitride (C₃N₄ NTs) and polyoxometalate (POM; H₃PW₁₂O₄₀) and developed molecularly imprinted sensors. Through CV and EIS, they realized a linear concentration span from 1.0 × 10⁻¹⁰ to 1.0 × 10⁻⁸ M with a recognition limit of 2.0 × 10⁻¹¹ M for gamma lindane (Pelin Böke et al., 2020).

On the other hand, organophosphate pesticides (OPP) although regulated, excessive use in protecting crops such as vegetables from pests has resulted in contamination of soils and water and eventually food. Furthermore, these pesticides are toxic and reasonably persistent in the ecosystem coupled with being prone to bioaccumulate along the food chain. The major exposure pathways include ingestion of contaminated food and/or water, inhaling sprays, and absorption through the skin while their harmful modal impact is principally nonreversible inhibition of acetylcholinesterase enzyme. Consequently, the neurotransmission activity is hampered with further implications on visual, respiratory, cognitive, sensory, and nervous impairment (Pellicer-Castell et al., 2020; Fu et al., 2019; Zhang et al., 2019c; Sgobbi and Machado 2018; Rajaji et al., 2019; Tian et al., 2018; Heydari et al., 2020). Similarly, carbamates, namely, carbendazim and carbaryl, are used to improve crop production and quality of yields via the elimination of pests. Notwithstanding that, carbamates contaminate ecological systems and are equally harmful to humans and animals on account of their toxicity besides having the same mechanism of disrupting neuronal transmission with detrimental effects including fatalities (Santana et al., 2019; Oliveira et al., 2020; Rahmani et al., 2018). Even though techniques currently being employed including chromatography are accurate and sensitive, they inherently have drawbacks. Among others, the techniques are laboratory-based, arduous sample preparation; they require certified personnel to operate and inappropriate for local analysis. Therefore, it is paramount to instantaneously detect the presence of different pesticides utilizing cost-effectual, portable, elevated sensitive, and selective devices especially within the aquatic media to enable remedial measures to be instituted when their presence exceeds permissible limits (Govindhan et al., 2014; Capoferri et al., 2018; Hernandez-Vargas et al., 2018; Willner and Vikesland 2018). Remarkably, variant innovative electrochemical technologies have been widely employed in sensing the presence of OCPs as reflected.

Organophosphorus containing pesticides (OPP) specifically malathion, MP, methyl chlorpyrifos, and diazinon are extensively used for the eradication of crops and plant pests in contemporary agricultural practices. Significant amounts of toxic, persistent, and bioaccumulative OPPs ultimately contaminate soil and aqueous media hence have hazardous effects on nontarget species like people. Therefore, detection of such pesticides in food and water with cost-effective, facile, rapid, and portable devices usable in loco is worthwhile (Sgobbi and Machado 2018; Ramachandran and Dhayabaran, 2019; Bolat and Abaci 2018).

Ramachandran and Dhayabaran devised a hybrid chemically polymerized in situ composite of MnO₂, polythiophene, and rGO for modifying a GCE intended for sensing MP, an OP categorized pesticide (Ramachandran and Dhayabaran, 2019). Owing to synergistic outcomes among the integrated components including π-π interactive force with MP, enormous effective surface area, satisfactory electrical conductivity, and improved charge transportation, enrichment of EC behavior was realized. The affirmed results were magnified selectiveness, remarkable sensitivity (0.0498 μA μM⁻¹), and low LOD of 5.72 nM as well as long shelf span stability thus showing the sensor’s potential applicability. In parallel, Tan et al. explored the modification of GCE employing nanohybridized rGO and ionic supramolecular arene for MP determination via EIS, DPV, and other techniques (Tan et al., 2019). Significantly, they reported boosted EC performance of the sensor system including a broad linearity dynamic range of 0.001–150 µM in conjunction with an inferior recognition molarity limit of 0.0003 µM, fast response, specificity, and sensitivity relative to beta-cyclodextrin-functionalized rGO-altered GCE. Additionally, they reckoned that the enrichment in EC properties was ascribable to improved supramolecular preciseness of CP5 toward MP and the synergic outcome of the macrocyclic arene such as fascinating function, complexation host-guest relation based on hydrogen bonds, and π-π interactions. Meanwhile, Figure 9 shows the comparative development of β-CD-rGO and CP5-rGO and the sensing of MP. Furthermore, a mechanistic sensing route was proposed involving a nitro reduction in a four-electron pathway. Ultimately, the researchers showed the potential viability of the developed system in actual sample analysis.

FIGURE 9

Pajooheshpour et al. designed an enzyme-free gold-platinum bimetallic nanocluster template on bovine serum albumin (BSA) before integrating it with graphene nanoribbons (Au-Pt@BSA-GNRs). This nanocomposite was used to modify a GCE for the sole purpose of quantification of diazinon (Pajooheshpour et al., 2018). Their CV and SWASV investigation attained a diazinon detection concentration limit of 0.002 µM, over linear function ranges of 0.01–10.0 and 10.0–170 µM. Besides, other properties of the altered electrode such as reproducibility, accuracy, and stability were improved. The refinement in EC properties was attributable to the synergistic impact of the Au-Pt nanoclusters. Effectively, they reduced the analyte transferring distance, generated quantum effects coupled to greatly functionalized protein, BSA, and multiplexed graphene electrical conduction plus vast specific surface area. Also, the fabricated sensor had satisfactory application potential.

In another study on OPP, Yola fabricated hexagonally structured boron nitride quantum dots solely incorporated on GO for manipulation of GCE surface. The innovative BNQDs/GO/GCE manipulated electrode was applied for sensing of MP, diazinon, and chlorpyrifos synchronously (Yola 2019). The researcher asserted improving sensitivity and linear relation span of 1.0 × 10⁻¹² M to 1.0 × 10⁻⁸ M and corresponding low LOD for diazinon, chlorpyrifos, and MP were 6.7 × 10⁻¹⁴ M, 3.3 × 10⁻¹⁴ M, and 3.1 × 10⁻¹³ M. Remarkably, the magnified EC performance was ascribed to the hybridization synergy of the wide bandgap, electrical conduction, and active surface area of 2D white graphene and novel GO properties.

While exploiting GQDs properties such as superior electron transfer, elevated surface area, and remarkable electric conduction, Mehta et al. attained a comparatively lower parathion low LOD of 46 pg L⁻¹ within a very broad linearity calibration span of 0.01–10⁶ ng L⁻¹. These results were established when they explored CV and EIS using an SPCE modified electrode with decorated amine-functionalized nanostructured GQDs. Additionally, they submitted that GQDs were homogeneously distributed on the electrode besides acting dually as an electron-donating component and acceptor which enriched the sensor behavior (Mehta et al., 2017).

Rahmani et al. constructed sulfur and nitrogen dually doped (via thiourea) three-dimension graphene decorated with gold nanoparticles composite for electrode modifying hence detection of carbaryl in different matrices. A low LOD of 0.0012 µM was attained within a linear relationship range of 0.004–0.3 µM through EC methods (Rahmani et al., 2018). Moreover, the augmented properties including appropriate lifespan, reproducibility, and satisfactory selectivity were accounted for by the collaborative impact of the hugely porous, enormous particular surface area, and rapid direct electron movement kinetics of 3D graphene evidenced by the amplified anodic peak currents for the altered electrode. Besides, the graphene is interlinked and made functional by the thiourea sulfur and nitrogen atoms relevant for complexation coupled to the excellent electrocatalytic quality of gold nanoparticles. Correspondingly, exploitation of synergistic impacts of noble metal nanoparticles which provide active adsorption centers and excellent electrical conduction, reactivating effect of macromolecule oxime against electrode passivation by the pesticide and doped graphene properties, has been undertaken. Zhang et al. explored the beneficial advantages of the cited materials and fabricated Au NPs-hybridized nitrogen-doped graphene further functionalized with a–SH containing oxime for electrode decoration. They achieved satisfactory sensitivity and reduced dimethoate concentration detection limit of 8.7 × 10⁻¹³ M over a broad linearity function range, 1.0 × 10⁻¹² to 4 × 10⁻⁸ M, attributable to combinational advantages of the materials (Zhang et al., 2017).

Emerging Pollutants

Emerging pollutants of concern refer to newly discovered compounds, already recognized chemicals that are still being studied to fully establish their ecological and human health implications particularly in conjunction with those recently found. Furthermore, there may be purely present-day issues cropping up on historically known and accepted “harmless” compounds (Su et al., 2018; Borrull et al., 2019; Álvarez-Ruiz and Picó 2020). Even though natural contaminants are present in ecosystems at diminished concentrations, there is the persistent anthropogenic deposition of these compounds, including pharmaceuticals, personal consumer products, industrial chemicals, pesticides, chemical warfare agents, and illicit drugs. Moreover, several of these emerging pollutants have endocrine disruptive characteristics, hence disturbing the natural hormonal functions. Apart from their ecological and human health implications they also causes different cancers and impairment of reproductive cardiovascular functions on human (Azzouz et al., 2019; Jaffrezic-Renault et al., 2020). Notably, triclosan, parabens (alky) phenols, polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs), perfluorinated compounds, bisphenol A, phthalates, organo/heavy metals, and other chemicals are among the endocrine interfering category generating distress worldwide (Borrull et al., 2019; Karzi et al., 2019; Álvarez-Ruiz and Picó 2020).

While currently used standard techniques for the determination of endocrine interfering chemicals including chromatographic and spectroscopic are reliable and sensitive, they have limitations. Among them are the need for certified personnel to operate the instruments, arduous sample preparation means, and being laboratory-based, thus not applicable for in situ analysis. Given the stated reasons, the detection of emerging pollutants including TCS (alkyl) phenols, PCBs, parabens, and other endocrine interfering chemicals in various media inclusive of water, using enormously sensitive, selective, cost-effective, portable, and fast response devices, remains critical even in present time (Zheng et al., 2018; Du et al., 2019; Moyo et al., 2015; Teixeira et al., 2020; Sk et al., 2019; Butmee et al., 2019).

Triclosan

Triclosan (TCS, 5-chloro-2-(2,4-dichlorphenyoxy) phenol) is extensively utilized as a dual preservative and antimicrobial constituent of pharmaceutical, household hygienic goods, and individual care products. Among others are toothpaste, deodorants, soaps, shampoos, lotions, dishwashing detergents, medical disinfectants, and underclothing. Ordinarily, TCS is anthropogenically released into ecological systems and water bodies through wastewater, however ineffectually treated, and it possibly has adverse effects on aquatic biota (Yola et al., 2015; Lehutso et al., 2017; Wu et al., 2017; Zheng et al., 2018; Teixeira et al., 2020). Furthermore, TCS is lipophilic and has been recognized as interfering with endocrine hormonal functioning; hence, it is globally considered a contemporary contaminant to worry about. Apart from that, TCS degradation intermediates and derivatives which include dioxins-like chemicals are potentially harmful owing to their carcinogenic status. Although TCS is regarded as low-level toxic and is regulated by international organizations, its detrimental human impact has been chronicled especially dermal aftermaths as a result of persistent exposure (Jaffrezic-Renault et al., 2020; Du et al., 2019; Moyo et al., 2015; Montaseri and Forbes 2018; Cullinan et al., 2015; Saljooqi et al., 2020).

Wu et al. fabricated nanocomposites consisting of palladium metal NPs, graphene, and a cationic polyelectrolyte poly (diallyl dimethyl ammonium chloride) (PDDA-Gr/Pd NPs) in a facile chemical protocol shown in Figure 10. The hybrids were used to refashion the GCE surface and evaluated through CV and DPV for the quantification of TCS. They established a TCS recognition concentration limit of 3.5 nM over a linearity correlation (9.0 nM–20.0 µM), with a remarkable shelf lifetime and satisfactory reproducibility. Particularly, they attributed the enriched sensor performance to the collaborative impact of the constituent material properties such as the good catalytic activity of Pd NPs and superior graphene conductivity and active surface area which enhanced electron transport speed. Besides, the viability of that sensor system was assessed in actual aqueous media samples (Wu et al., 2017).

FIGURE 10

In a different investigation, Saljooqi et al. fabricated a magnetic iron oxide (Fe₃O₄)-functionalized GO before coating with gold and polypyrrole (Fe₃O₄@Au-PPy/GO) for GCE modification. The modified electrode was used in studying the quantification of TCS through EC techniques such as CV and DPV (Saljooqi, Shamspur, and Mostafavi, 2020). Their findings indicated marked sensitivity, long-term stability in addition to an LOD, and calibration range of 2.5 × 10⁻⁹ M and 0.01–1.0 μmol mL⁻¹, respectively. Distinctly, the enhanced performance of this sensor configuration was ascribed to combinational effects of the original properties of the hybrid materials.

Meanwhile, Akylidirim assembled a novel NC integrating through a hydrothermal strategy, silver NPs, with graphitic carbon nitride, C₃N₄, GQDs, and an ionic liquid (IL) (Ag NPs/C₃N₄ NTs@GQDs/IL) as electrode modifier (Akyıldırım, 2020). The researcher employed the modified GC electrode in the determination of TCS via CV, DPV, and EIS, subsequently reporting a low LOD of 2.0 × 10⁻¹² M and a linear response spanning from 1.0 × 10⁻¹² to 1.0 × 10⁻⁸ M. The Ag NPs/C₃N₄ NTs@GQDs/IL nanohybrid potentially exhibited integral properties emanating from the individual composite materials. These included the large electroactive area and outstanding conductivity of GQDs, the excellent ionic conductivity of IL, electron-conducting pathways of g-C₃N₄, and the electrocatalytic effect of Ag NPs toward TCS and the aftermath was rapid electron mobility.

Parabens

Comparably, another category of chemicals that were initially considered less harmful as they are employed as additives for preservation and antiseptic purposes is parabens. Particularly, they are used in cosmetics, personal care, and pharmaceutical formulations as well as food and beverage preservatives; hence, they find their way into water sources. Nonetheless, parabens have proven to be disruptive to the human endocrine functional system and dermal problems and may have hazardous environmental implications (Kajornkavinkul et al., 2016; Mendonça et al., 2017; Piovesan et al., 2018; Faradilla Wan Khalid et al., 2019; Muñoz et al., 2020).

Piovesan et al. constructed a nanocomposite integrating rGO and gold nanoparticles in a dispersion of chitosan (Au NPs-rGO-CS) toward modifying the GCE surface. CS served concurrently as GO reductant and nanohybrid stabilizer. They applied the adjusted electrode for the detection of methyl paraben (MeP), an endocrine disruptive constituent of PCPs. The CV and EIS results indicated a wider linear calibration range of 0.03–1.30 μmol L⁻¹ with respective limits of quantification and concentration detection of 41.73 and 13.77 μmol L⁻¹ and superior sensitivity. Additionally, the upgraded sensor performance as evidenced by the magnified anodic peak currents was attributed to synergic effects of the integrated components (Piovesan et al., 2018).

Mendonca et al. described a solvothermally synthesized ruthenium NPs-functionalized rGO for modifying electrode surface character. The integrated rGO-Ru NPs NC-modified GCE was then evaluated for the quantification of MeP using DPV. Enhanced signal for the altered electrode was observed; hence, an LOD and calibration linear range of 2.40 × 10⁻⁷ mol L⁻¹ and 5.00 × 10⁻⁷ to 3.00 × 10⁻⁶ mol L⁻¹, respectively, were reported. This was due to the synergism as a result of the integration of individual material properties which facilitated rapid electron transfer rate and improved conductivity (Mendonça et al., 2017). Analogously, Khalid et al. designed a cellulose nanocrystal (CNC)-functionalized rGO NC for electrode modification, using a facile protocol of sonication and drop-casting (Faradilla Wan Khalid et al., 2019). The CNC-rGO/SPE was employed for MeP determination through CV, DPV, and EIS. In this instance, the acceptable film-forming qualities and antiadsorption ability of CNC were beneficial as well as the outstanding electrical conductivity of rGO. The synergic interaction enhanced sensing by the configured electrode through inhibiting MeP from adsorbing onto the surface of rGO owing to π-π functioning, improved selectivity, and fast charge transfer. An LOD of 1.0 × 10⁻⁴ M with a concentration span of 2 × 10⁻⁴ to 9 × 10⁻⁴ M was attained. The sensor system showed reusability potential and proved to be a viable option in actual product analysis for MeP.

Likewise, Munoz et al. composed different dimensional nanocomposites including rGO decorated with platinum nanoparticles (Pt NPs/rGO) as a surface modifier for GCE. They explored through CV and DPV the detection of MeP and reported magnification of sensor performance such as a low recognition limit of 2.5 µM accompanied by a wider correlation range of 5.0–50 µM and elevated sensitivity of 45 μA μM⁻¹. Meanwhile, they concluded that the platinum-functionalized one dimension CNT was the best sensor platform with LOD and linearity in the nanomolar range (Muñoz et al., 2020). Similarly, Santana and Spinelli exploited the benefits emanating from hybridizing GQDs with a natural polymer CS. They modified GCE and investigated through CV and DPV the determination of TCS and MeP concurrently. Recognition limits of 0.03 μmol L⁻¹ plus 0.04 μmol L⁻¹ for respective TCS and MeP were achieved over a broad functional span of 0.10–10.0 μmol L⁻¹. Moreover, the enrichment of properties was on account of synergism between GQDs and CS (Santana and Spinelli, 2020).

Bisphenol A

Similarly, bisphenol A, BPA (2,2-bis (4-hydroxyphenyl) propane), is a primary ingredient widely employed for the commercial production of macromolecular products viz polycarbonate polymers and epoxy resins. Furthermore, BPA is thus a useful component of packaging containers employed in the food and beverages industries. However, the presence of BPA in different media including water sources has been substantiated while it is partially treated in the water treatment terrain (Zou et al., 2019; Canevari et al., 2019; Yu et al., 2017). BPA has been recognized for its tendency to accumulate and be magnified along the trophic chain besides its persistence within the ecosystem. Recently, BPA has been acknowledged for its adverse impact on the ecology and health of mankind. Specifically, BPA is an endocrine system disrupting compound which imitates the natural estrogens’ hormonal system. Concurrently, the toxic chemical further severely impairs the human nervous function, reproductive system, cardiovascular role apart from being potentially a carcinogen (Sk et al., 2019; Li et al., 2017; Butmee et al., 2019; Pang et al., 2020).

Shi et al. devised a single-step EC reduction of GO in which the formed rGO was used to enfold copper (I) oxide, Cu₂O. The GCE was modified with Cu₂O-rGO nanohybrid and assessed through CV in the determination of BPA (Shi et al., 2017a). When compared to Cu₂O/GCE, rGO/GCE, and the bare electrode, Cu₂O-rGO/GCE had good electrocatalytic performance, as evidenced by the high anodic currents. A diminished LOD and wider linearity function of 5.3 × 10⁻⁸ M and 1 × 10⁻⁷ to 8 × 10⁻⁵ M respectively were reported. Furthermore, the enriched sensor properties were on account of the synergistic impact of rGO possessing high electroactive and superior conductivity plus the marked catalytic activity of the metal oxide which facilitated electron transport. The sensor configuration was evaluated to be a viable candidate for BPA sensing in aqueous media.

Similarly, Canevari et al. fabricated hybridized rGO and carbon NPs material through dispersing GO in alcoholic media with CNPs which simultaneously acted as reductant and attachment link to rGO. The CNPs-rGO hybrids were used in SPCE modification then explored the determination of BPA through DPV and EIS (Canevari et al., 2019). The researchers reported a low LOD of 1 × 10⁻⁹ mol L⁻¹, a sensitivity of 189.5 μmol L⁻¹, and a broad linear response spanning from 7.5 × 10⁻⁹ to 2.6 × 10⁻⁷ mol L⁻¹. The rGO-CNPs-modified electrode showed an elevated electrocatalytic response and reduced charge transfer resistance, thus expediting the unimpeded electron transport from the solution toward the electrode. Significantly, such enriched sensor characteristics were due to the synergy premised on the huge electroactive surface area of CNPs and magnificent electrical conductivity of rGO. Moreover, the sensor design proved to be a potential candidate for BPA sensing in drinking water.

Equally, Li et al. assembled a simple GCE modifier integrating reduced graphene oxide, silver metal NPs, and a biopolymer, poly-l-lysine (rGO-Ag NPs/PLL), and then explored the sensor system for BPA detection through CV, DPV, and EIS. Distinctly, a widely varying linear relationship of 1–80 µM with a capped sensing response of 0.54 µM is attained plus satisfactory stability and good specificity. These were attributable to improved electroactive anchoring sites, hydrogen bond linkages, and enhanced electron mobility (Li et al., 2017). Likewise, Butmee et al. fabricated a facile nanocomposite of graphene nanoplatelets functionalized by an ionic liquid (IL-GNPs) as shown in Figure 11. The NC was applied for electrode modification prior to investigating BPA sensing using CV, DPV, and EIS techniques. They reported enrichment of properties including a low LOD of 6.4 nM over a linearity function range of 0.02–5.0 µM besides reasonable stability, and enhanced sensitivity was due to synergistic impact owing to elevated ionic conductivity of IL and large surface area of GNPs leading to fast electron mobility (Butmee et al., 2019).

FIGURE 11

Butmee et al., 2019). Copyright 2018, Elsevier.

Additionally, Table 2 shows further findings of recent research utilizing graphene-derived materials toward sensing of pesticides in addition to other emerging pollutants.

Natural Organic Matter

Natural organic matter (NOM) refers to complicated heterogeneous matrices of nonhumic products, humin, humic acid, and fulvic acid other than colloidal matter derived from different hydrological and biogeochemical processes. Moreover, by various means either internal to an ecosystem or exterior like anthropogenic pathways, including microbiological degradation, the formation of natural humic substances principally occurs. Notably, humic acid and fulvic acid have functional component groups viz carboxyl, hydroxyl, phenols, amino acids, among others which influence their behavior in water. Several studies have indicated the variability of NOM in surface waters (Nkambule et al., 2012; Särkkä et al., 2015; Sillanpää et al., 2018; Fakayode et al., 2020).

Significantly, NOM in water is by no means solely toxic nor is it a contaminant. Nonetheless, water’s unpalatable organoleptic characteristics inclusive of inferior taste, undesirable color, foul odor, and lack of freshness are attributed to the presence of NOM. Additionally, the organic content is considered responsible for the corresponding and concurrent chemical coagulant expenditure and the regularly undertaken plant backwashing owing to membrane fouling (Moyo et al., 2019; Roosmini et al., 2018; Sarno et al., 2019; Chaukura et al., 2018; Islam et al., 2020). Apart from that, NOM nurtures microbial regrowth and promotes complexation since the terminal functional groups act as ligands which complex with HM ions boosting the bioavailability and toxicity of organometals (Adekunle et al., 2020; Ma et al., 2018; Zhao et al., 2019; Islam et al., 2020). Furthermore, when there is inadequate removal of NOM before either chlorinating or chloramination, it is recognized that the respective chlorine or chlorine dioxide gases react with the organic material forming known mutagenic and carcinogenic disinfectant by-products (DBPs) (Basumallick and Santra 2017; Haarhoff et al., 2010; Nkambule et al., 2009; Ray et al., 2017; Fakayode et al., 2019b; Li et al., 2012; Sillanpää et al., 2018). Besides, the DBPs have other impactful effects, namely, liver damage (Zhang et al., 2019a).

In view of the grave challenges stemming from the variability, indeterminate composition, and the recalcitrant predisposition status of NOM, it is accordingly imperative that innovative technologies be modeled to monitor its prevalence (and removal) to inhibit the formation of DBPs right through the water purification terrain (Särkkä et al., 2015; Ye et al., 2018; Pavitt and Tratnyek 2019; Adekunle et al., 2020). Lately, electrochemical strategies have been proposed and gained considerable recognition ascribable to being cost-effective, the potential for actual-time, online analysis, elevated sensitivity, and selectivity. Significant reports in the literature show that considerable attention has been focused on the detection of NOM particularly humic and fulvic acids in aquatic environments using spectroscopic techniques. Nevertheless, much of the electrochemical sensing material has been based on either organic macromolecules or (un)functionalized metal (oxides) nanoparticles (Basumallick and Santra 2017; Ma et al., 2018; Fakayode et al., 2019a; Pavitt and Tratnyek 2019; Adekunle et al., 2020; Fakayode et al., 2020).

Nitroaromatics

Nitroaromatics, namely, nitrophenol compounds are key ingredients in agriculture and industry. Notwithstanding, nitroaromatics compounds find their way into the ecology hence, contributing significantly to environmental pollution due to their elevated toxicity (Qin et al., 2019; Li et al., 2019). Nitroaromatics such as DNT, TNP, TNT, and NB are used in chemical explosives and landmines. Explosives residues are recognized to cause harmful effects to the central nervous, cardiovascular, and respiratory systems among others (Wen et al., 2018; Jigyasa and Kaur Rajput, 2018; Ramachandran and Karunkaran Yesodha, 2019). Therefore, it is crucial to protect the environment through timeous, target-specific, simple, sensitive detection means. EC techniques have gained recognition due to analyte specificity, sensitivity, portability, on-site, and real-time determinations.

He et al. prepared a sensor for EC determination of nitrophenol based on acetylene black paste and graphene hybrid electrode (GR/ABPE). Through CV, respective linear range and LOD of 20 nM to 8.0 and 8.0 µM were reported (He et al., 2019b). Most recently, Hwa et al. fabricated an EC sensor exploiting halloysite nanotubes (HNTs) and Ag NPs decorated on rGO for modification of GCE. The rGO-HNTs-Ag NPs-configured sensor was examined in the sensing of 4-NP through CV and DPV. Significantly, the researchers achieved a linear response in the concentration range 0.1–363.9 µM, with an LOD of 48.6 nM and sensitivity of 35.25 µAµM⁻¹ cm⁻². Additionally, the sensor was found viable when evaluated using different sample matrices (Hwa and Ganguly, 2020).

Similarly, Zhang et al. adopted dual heteroatom doping introducing nitrogen and sulfur into graphene nanoribbons prior to base washing (BW) and then modified a GCE. The BW-NS-rGO NRs/GCE sensor was studied through CV, DPV, and EIS in detecting TNT. The sensor platform recorded a wide linear range of 0.0008–5.1 ppm and LOD of 0.1 ppb. The superb sensing performance is attributed to the dual doping of N and S atoms and full exposure of the rich defective active sites of BW-NS-rGO NRs after base washing, and rGO enables target molecules binding besides its high electrical conductivity; thus, signal amplification was realized. The proposed sensing platform was evaluated and exhibited potential for TNT determination in water samples (Zhang et al., 2018b).

Li et al. fabricated a core-shell GO@polymerized-Mn-porphyrin (GMPP@AMP) nanocomposite for altering GCE surface and the platform was applied for the determination of NB via CV and DPV. Evidently, there was synergistic impact owing to the prevalence of functionalizing nitrogen-containing moieties, π-π porous conjugated caged metalloporphyrin structure, and GO conductivity expediting the high electron transfer capacity, strong mutual affinity, and increased contact area between NB and the mesoporous polymer enhancing the electrocatalytic activity of the sensor. The reported linear range was 0.04–0.24 mM while LOD was 0.243 × 10⁻⁶ M and the evaluated sensor exhibited practical prospects for sensing NB in ecological matrices (Li et al., 2019).

Ramachandran, Nair, and Yesodha explored aromatic nitrogen-doped GQDs synthesized via the hydrothermal treatment of precursor PANI. The modified GCE (N-GQD/GCE) was employed for the detection of TNP through DPV and an LOD of 0.2 ppb (1 nM) was revealed. They concluded that the enhanced sensitivity and selectivity emanate from rich N-doped aromatic structure of the N-GQD which promoted closer and selective molecular interactions with nitroaromatics through ring stacking, π-π interaction, or hydrogen bonding which improved the electrical conductivity and electron transferability. Again, the sensor also differentiated various nitroaromatic species, TNP, DNT, and NP DNT (Ramachandran and Karunakaran Yesodha, 2019).

Polyphenols

Polyphenols including flavonoids, phenolic acids, tannic acid, and polyphenolic amides are abundantly prevalent in fruits, vegetables, beverages, herbs, and spices among others. Further, notable examples viz garlic acid, curcumin, and catechins are readily available. Polyphenols have diverse acclaimed health benefits; however, some may have potential toxicity. Either way, their detection with facile, sensitive, cost-effective, on-site portable devices is worthwhile (Kokulnathan et al., 2018; Ganesh et al., 2019; Manikandan et al., 2019; Ansari and Arvand 2020; Suvina et al., 2020).

Manikandan et al. (2019) configured a sensor based on fluorine-doped GO and modified a GCE. The F-GO/GCE sensor was applied for the detection of caffeic acid via CV and DPV and then realized concentration range and LOD of 0.5–100.0 and 0.018 µM, respectively. Fluorine has elevated electron affinity which leads to the formation of fluorine dopant-to-graphenic carbon electron linkages and generation of reactive centers, hence improving electrical communication. Moreover, the applicability of the sensor was judged to be a potential quality control means for the determination of polyphenols in food and beverages industry.

Analogously, Kokulnathan et al. constructed a hexamine cobalt (III) coordination complex [Co(NH₃)₆]⁺³ grafted onto a rGO NC-modified GCE. The rGO/[Co(NH₃)₆]⁺³ chelate was produced through a sonochemical process. The platform was employed via CV, DPV, and EIS for the determination of a flavonoid, morin (MR) (Kokulnathan et al., 2018). They revealed a wide linear range, LOD, and sensitivity of 0.008–72.35 µM, 1.0 nM, and 4.326 μA μM⁻¹ cm⁻² correspondingly. Notably, the cobalt hexamine complex has excellent electrocatalytic activity attributed to its heterogeneous electron transferability which enhanced the sensor’s analytical performance.

Recently, Ansari and Arvand developed a magnetic bar carbon paste electrode (MBCPE) modified using cobalt ferrite magnetic electrospun nanofibers (NFs) and GO and reconnoitred the determination of rutin, a flavonoid. They applied CV and DPV to investigate the behavior of rutin on the modified MBCPE (Ansari and Arvand, 2020). Significantly, they reported two linear ranges viz 0.001–0.1 nM and 1.0–100 nM besides an extremely low LOD of 0.94 pM. Likewise, they ascribed the enriched sensor characteristics to the spinel ferrite’s superior electrical conductivity due to swinging of electrons between different valence states of the metals and availing surface redox-active sites for adsorption.

Catechol (CT) has varied health advantages and is regarded as a principal fragment of tea catechins. However, CT is recognized to have potential toxic and carcinogenic characteristics; thus, its determination has been pursued. Suvina et al. (2020) devised an original CT sensor based on lanthanum cobaltite anchored on graphene nanosheets (LaCo/GNSs) and modified a GCE prior to monophenol determination through CV and EIS. The sensor configuration attained LOD of 1.0 nM, sensitivity of 5.68 μA μM⁻¹ cm⁻², and broad linear range of 0.009–132 µM. Distinctly, the sensor components LaCo and GNSs impacted the sensor analytical performance as LaCo has a nanostructured framework with great biochemical compatibility, superior electrical conductivity, large surface area, rapid electron transfer, and short channels. Conversely, graphene is known for its delocalized π electron system, excellent electron communication, numerous structural defects, and high surface area-to-volume ratio. These properties were synergistically integrated attaining increased surface area, increased analyte affinity, and signal amplification.

Nitrates and Sulfates

Nitrates are key ingredients of fertilizers which are a backbone of intense farming practices. They are also available as a constituent of the natural nitrogen cycle; however, transcend fertilizer applications cause an imbalance. Consequently, excess nitrates are leached into ecological systems including soil and water sources. Distinctively, excessive exposure to nitrates may pose potential risks to human health on account of potential toxicity. Moreover, nitrates also affect ecological balance in water sources leading to adverse aftermaths on aquatic biota due to eutrophication. On the other hand, sulfates are also valuable constituents of contemporary industrial and agricultural practices. Despite that, they invariably contribute to environmental pollution. Therefore, it is critical to enforce environmental protection and safeguard human health, through EC detection techniques which are more appealing attributable to their simplicity, rapid response, high sensitivity, target specificity, portability, and potential actual on-site analysis (Mahmud et al., 2020; Jiang et al., 2020; Li et al., 2020).

Bagheri et al. developed a sensor based on Cu NPs, MWCNTs, and electrochemically prepared rGO where the Cu NPs were deposited on the MWCNTs-rGO matrix to create a platform. The Cu NP/MWCNTs/rGO nanohybrid was utilized in modifying a GCE and then used for concurrent determination of nitrates and nitrites via CV (Bagheri et al., 2017). The authors deduced that the well-dispersed Cu metal on MWCNT-rGO composite contributed to the improvement of the electrochemical activity and the active redox sites. Ultimately, the sensor had high sensitivity and differentiation, while a low LOD of 0.1 µM and a wide linear range of 1–10⁻³ μM were achieved. Additionally, the sensor was evaluated proving to be a potential candidate for nitrates/nitrites analysis in samples.

Correspondingly, Wang, Kim, and Cui prepared a nitrate sensor utilizing polyelectrolytes, positively charged poly(diallyl dimethyl ammonium chloride) (PDDA), and negatively charged poly(sodium 4-styrene sulphonate) (PSS) with self-assembled Cu NPs and graphene NSs (Wang et al., 2018). They modified an electrode surface and then applied the sensor for detection of nitrates through CV attaining sensitivity of 0.2 μA μM⁻¹ and detection limit of 7.89 µM. Furthermore, it was considered that the polyelectrolytes stimulated anchoring the graphene onto the glass substrate and the resultant 3D network actuated enhancement of reactive surface area and ultimately the sensor performance. Again, the practicality of the proposed sensor was examined demonstrating promising viability for the determination of nitrates in real water samples.

Yu et al. (2016) designed a sensor based on the electrooxidation of a complex heteropoly blue with poly-_L-lysine-functionalized graphene. The platform was employed in modifying GCE prior to investigating the determination of sulfate ions through SW. The determination was undertaken indirectly in the presence of a surfactant cetyltrimethylammonium bromide (CTAB) due to high overpotential. A wide linear range and LOD of 0.8–1,000 and 0.26 µM, respectively, were reported. More so, there was synergism among the blue complex, the surfactant, and graphene which resulted in signal enhancement.

Challenges and Opportunities

Although significant research on graphene synthesis has been undertaken, inherent impediments still exist. Presently, graphene-based nanomaterial preparation methods have prospects for improvement in terms of reproducibility and possible upscaling. The goal remains to synthesize functionalizable graphene-based nanomaterials which would attain preciseness and sensitivity expeditiously though produced through cost-effective means. Furthermore, the fabricated material needs to have prolonged stability and durability under ambient and environmental conditions with the potential to be used again. On the other hand, numerous nanomaterial sensors have been designed, explored, and evaluated at laboratory status but methods for upscaling of nanomaterials to massive production at low cost with satisfactory reproducibility continue to be challenging. Thus, facile but cost-effective graphene-based material synthesis approaches to enable bigger scale production are still an area to pursue (Molina et al., 2016; Nag et al., 2018; Tiwari et al., 2018; Wongkaew et al., 2019).

Utilizing graphene-based material in electrode modulation continues to have drawbacks such as fouling and nonspecific interaction, hence generating other signals. Besides that, agglomeration results in the manifestation of defects particularly when composites are formed integrating organic polymers. Another distinct challenge is the applications in real original matrices which need to be explored further to establish the influence of sample matrix (Sturala et al., 2018; Krishnan et al., 2019; Smith et al., 2019). Currently, the wholesome effects of graphene-derivatized nanomaterials on ecological systems are yet to be fully understood. Moreover, the extent of these graphene-based nanomaterials’ impact on human health is being studied. Besides, understanding the toxicity and persistence, it is prudent to prevent deposition of nanoparticle materials into aquatic media while toxicological impact and scientific knowledge gaps of nanographene and its derivatives on the environment are being reduced. Therefore, the question of the fate and dilemma of bioavailability of nanomaterials to aquatic flora and fauna in the environment needs to be interrogated further (Sharma et al., 2020; Lai et al., 2018; Huang et al., 2019a; Song et al., 2016). Apart from that, the absence of international regulatory framework and proclaimed definitions to guide the evaluation of nanomaterials toxicity on the environment, aquatic biota, and humankind retards progress on assessment. Consequently, there is a need for consensus in establishing such guidelines (Huang et al., 2019b; Song et al., 2016).

Windows of opportunities are present given that it is imperative to continuously improve protocols for graphene synthesis to achieve bulky graphene production. Besides, controlled synthesis is desirable to produce crystals of specific chemicophysical characteristics to prevent restacking of graphene and provide outstanding templates for large-scale preparation. Additionally, modification of graphene surface to mitigate against fouling and nonspecific interactions, improve reusability of materials, and enhance reproducibility and repeatability of synthesis processes requires further studying. Moreover, the assessment of selectivity, stability, and sensitivity of graphene-based nanohybrids in unpleasant conditions and complicated environmental matrices of multiplex analytes presents research possibilities. Beyond this, more research to assure the global population of the biocompatibility, zero environmental persistence, and nontoxicity status of graphene-based NMs is valuable. As such, the perpetual application of graphitic materials would hinge on research to evaluate and repress toxicity, thus guaranteeing the absence of any potential health risk to both humans and the ecosystem (Wang et al., 2020; Peña-Bahamonde et al., 2018; Lee et al., 2019a; Tiwari et al., 2018; Lawal 2018; Cinti and Arduini 2017; Willner and Vikesland 2018).

Critical method refinement for NMs development from 2D to 3D graphenic structures and utilization of 3D printing technology remains very attractive since electrical and electronic characteristics are greatly enhanced with diverse possibilities in applications. Furthermore, there is potential in miniaturization of graphene sensors and fabrication of flexible graphene sensor devices for point of analysis of pollutants. Besides, further exploration of applications of GQDs motivated by their superior properties should be rewarding for the scientific community (Molina et al., 2016; Sturala et al., 2018; Su et al., 2018; Zuo et al., 2019). Therefore, the functionalization of graphene-derived NMs with diverse materials continues to be appealing. Hence, further understanding of the interaction between analytes and hybridized graphene derivatives would be generated. Apart from that, the potential EC detection mechanisms for DBPs-inducing NOM, emerging contaminants of concern, and hazardous pesticides enlist exploration. Moreover, various innovative research initiatives coupling functionalized graphene-derived nanomaterials to different technological dimensions to develop improved and cost-effective devices for point of assessment of contaminants of concern are worthwhile.

Conclusion and Future Reckoning

This review evaluated recent electrochemical detection of HM ions, pesticides, and emerging pollutants utilizing different electrodes modified with graphene-derived nanocomposite materials. Apart from that, the review summarized the graphene-based materials methods of synthesis and their functionalization. Likewise, the immediate challenges being encountered in the synthesis and application of graphene nanomaterials have been outlined, thus pointing to envisaged opportunities for future research. Among others, massive scale production of graphene nanomaterials remains a dilemma, while the aspects of reproducibility as well as long-term stability of fabricated sensor systems are daunting. Meanwhile, the totality of the impact of nanosized materials including graphene and its offshoots on human health and environment is yet to be fully documented and international guidelines on ecotoxicity need to be established. Virtually, graphene-derived materials including rGO, 3D graphene, GQDs, and doped graphene remain appealing for nanocomposite synthesis and electrode modification. Enhanced sensor configurations culminate in the development of portable sensor devices with the potential for point of analysis and online monitoring of HM ions and organic and emerging pollutants in protecting different media especially food, water, and the environment.

References

• 1

  AdekunleA. S.FakayodeO. J.MambaB. B.NkambuleT. T. I. (2020). Determination of humic acid (HA) and sodium alginate in water using Fe₂O₃ and CuO nanoparticle-modified glassy carbon electrode. Int. J. Environ. Anal. Chem.14, 121–137. 10.1080/03067319.2020.1726334

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 2

  AhmadH.FanM.HuiD. (2018). Graphene oxide incorporated functional materials: a review. Compos. B Eng.145, 270–280. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2018.02.006

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 3

  AkyıldırımO. (2020). A sensitive voltammetric sensor based on silver nanoparticles/carbon nitride Nanotubes@graphene quantum dots/a novel organic liquid: determination of triclosan in wastewater. Bull. Mater. Sci.43 (1), 22–25. 10.1007/s12034-020-02155-x

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 4

  AL-GahouariH.TheeazenL.BodkheG.SayyadP.IngleN.MahadikM.et al (2020). “Electrochemical sensor: L-cysteine induced selectivity enhancement of electrochemically reduced graphene oxide–multiwalled carbon nanotubes hybrid for detection of lead (Pb2+) ions. Front. Mater.7. 10.3389/fmats.2020.00068

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 5

  Álvarez-RuizR.PicóY. (2020). Analysis of emerging and related pollutants in aquatic biota. Trends Environ. Anal. Chem.25, 111. 10.1016/j.teac.2020.e00082

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 6

  AmbrosiA.ChuaC. K.LatiffN. M.LooA. H.WongC. H.EngA. Y.et al (2016). Graphene and its electrochemistry - an update. Chem. Soc. Rev.45 (9), 2458–2493. 10.1039/c6cs00136j

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 7

  AnsariS. H.ArvandH. (2020). A magnetic nanocomposite prepared from electrospun CoFe₂O₄ nanofibers and graphene oxide as a material for highly sensitive determination of rutin OH. Microchimica Acta.187, 121. 10.1007/s00604-019-4068-3

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 8

  AragayG.PinoF.MerkoçiA. (2012). Nanomaterials for sensing and destroying pesticides. Chem. Rev.112 (10), 5317–5338. 10.1021/cr300020c

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 9

  ArfinT.RangariS. N. (2018). Graphene oxide-ZnO nanocomposite modified electrode for the detection of phenol. Anal. Methods.10 (3), 347–358. 10.1039/c7ay02650a

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 10

  AvourisP.DimitrakopoulosC. (2012). Graphene: synthesis and applications. Mater. Today.15 (3), 86–97. 10.1016/S1369-7021(12)70044-5

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 11

  AzzouzA.Kumar KailasaS.KumarP.BallesterosE.KimK. H. (2019). Advances in functional nanomaterial-based electrochemical techniques for screening of endocrine disrupting chemicals in various sample matrices. Trac. Trends Anal. Chem.113, 256–279. 10.1016/j.trac.2019.02.017

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 12

  BaghayeriM.Ghanei-MotlaghM.TayebeeR.FayaziM.NarenjiF. (2020). Application of graphene/zinc-based metal-organic framework nanocomposite for electrochemical sensing of as(III) in water resources. Anal. Chim. Acta.1099, 60–67. 10.1016/j.aca.2019.11.045

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 13

  BagheriH.HajianA.RezaeiM.ShirzadmehrA. (2017). Composite of Cu metal nanoparticles-multiwall carbon nanotubes-reduced graphene oxide as a novel and high performance platform of the electrochemical sensor for simultaneous determination of nitrite and nitrate. J. Hazard Mater.324, 762–772. 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2016.11.055

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 14

  BahadirE. B.SezgintürkM. K. (2016). Applications of graphene in electrochemical sensing and biosensing. Trac. Trends Anal. Chem.76, 1–14. 10.1016/j.trac.2015.07.008

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 15

  BanerjeeS.McCrackenS.HossainM. F.SlaughterG. (2020). Electrochemical detection of neurotransmitters. Biosensors.10 (8). 33. 10.3390/bios10080101

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 16

  BansodB.KumarT.ThakurR.RanaS.SinghI. (2017). A review on various electrochemical techniques for heavy metal ions detection with different sensing platforms. Biosens. Bioelectron.94 (January), 443–455. 10.1016/j.bios.2017.03.031

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 17

  BaoJ.HuangT.WangZ.HanY.GengX.XuG.et al (2019). 3D graphene/copper oxide nano-flowers based acetylcholinesterase biosensor for sensitive detection of organophosphate pesticides. Sensor. Actuator. B Chem.279, 95–101. 10.1016/j.snb.2018.09.118

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 18

  BasumallickS.SantraS. (2017). Monitoring of ppm level humic acid in surface water using ZnO—chitosan nano-composite as fluorescence probe. Appl. Water Sci.7 (2), 1025–1031. 10.1007/s13201-015-0291-1

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 19

  BeitollahiH.SafaeiM.TajikS. (2019). Application of graphene and graphene oxide for modification of electrochemical sensors and Biosensors : a review. Int. J. Nano Dimens. (IJND).10 (2), 125–140. 10.18494/sam.2015.1058

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 20

  BhadraC. M.WernerM.BaulinV. A.Vi KhanhT.KobaisiM. A.NguyenS. H.et al (2018). Subtle variations in surface properties of black silicon surfaces influence the degree of bactericidal efficiency. Nano-Micro Lett.10 (2), 1–8. 10.1007/s40820-017-0186-9

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 21

  BolatG.AbaciS. (2018). Non-enzymatic electrochemical sensing of malathion pesticide in tomato and apple samples based on gold nanoparticles-chitosan-ionic liquid hybrid nanocomposite. Sensors.18 (3). 10.3390/s18030773

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 22

  BollellaP.FuscoG.TortoliniC.SanzòG.FaveroG.GortonL.AntiochiaR. (2017). Beyond graphene: electrochemical sensors and biosensors for biomarkers detection. Biosens. Bioelectron.89, 152–166. 10.1016/j.bios.2016.03.068

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 23

  BorrullJ.ColomA.FabregasJ.PocurullE.BorrullF. (2019). A simple, fast method for the analysis of 20 contaminants of emerging concern in river water using large-volume direct injection liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. Anal. Bioanal. Chem.411 (8), 1601–1610. 10.1007/s00216-019-01602-x

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 24

  ButmeeP.TumcharernG.SaejuengP.StankovicD.OrtnerA.JitcharoenJ.et al (2019). A direct and sensitive electrochemical sensing platform based on ionic liquid functionalized graphene nanoplatelets for the detection of bisphenol A. J. Electroanal. Chem.833, 370–379. 10.1016/j.jelechem.2018.12.014

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 25

  CampuzanoS.PedreroM.Yanez-SedenoP.PingarronJ. M. (2019). Antifouling ( bio ) materials for electrochemical ( bio ) sensing. Int. J. Mol. Sci.20 (423), 1–19. 10.3390/ijms20020423

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 26

  Canalejas-TejeroV.HernándezA. L.CasquelR.QuinteroS. A.LagunaM. F.HolgadoM. (2018). Fabrication of Si₃N₄/SiO₂ tiered resonant nanopillars with nickel caps arrays: application for optochemical sensing. Opt. Mater. Express.8 (4), 1082. 10.1364/ome.8.001082

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 27

  CanevariT. C.RossiM. V.AlexiouA. D. P. (2019). Development of an electrochemical sensor of endocrine disruptor bisphenol A by reduced graphene oxide for incorporation of spherical carbon nanoparticles. J. Electroanal. Chem.832, 24–30. 10.1016/j.jelechem.2018.10.044

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 28

  CapoferriD.Della PelleF.Del CarloM.CompagnoneD. (2018). Affinity sensing strategies for the detection of pesticides in food. Foods.7 (9), 114. 10.3390/foods7090148

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 29

  ChangW. D.BaekJ.-B. (2017). Charge transport in graphene oxide. Nano Today.17, 38–53. 10.1016/j.nantod.2017.10.010

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 30

  ChaukuraN.NdlangamandlaN. G.MoyoW.TitusA.MsagatiM.MambaB. B.et al (2018). Natural organic matter in aquatic systems - a South African perspective. WaterSA.44 (4), 624–635. 10.4314/wsa.v44i4.11

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 31

  ChenK. H.PanM. J.JargalsaikhanZ.IshdorjT. O.TsengF. G. (2020). Development of surface-enhanced Raman scattering (SERS)-Based surface-corrugated nanopillars for biomolecular detection of colorectal cancer. Biosensors.10 (11), 12–37. 10.3390/bios10110163.Tseng

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 32

  ChenX.WangJ.LiuZ.LiY.HuangJ.TaoC. A. (2019). One pot fabrication of graphene-bimetallic nanoparticles-based acetylcholinesterase electrochemical biosensor with ultralow detection limit toward methyl parathion. Mater. Res. Express.6 (10), 39. 10.1088/2053-1591/ab3e84

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 33

  ChengY. M.HuanB. F.YinW.ChangJ. H.HuoD. Q.FangM.et al (2016). A sensitive electrochemical sensor for lead based on gold nanoparticles/nitrogen-doped graphene composites functionalized with l-cysteine-modified electrode. J. Solid State Electrochem.20 (2), 327–335. 10.1007/s10008-015-3043-0

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 34

  ChimezieA. B.HajianR.YusofN. A.Meng WoiP.ShamsN. (2017). Fabrication of reduced graphene oxide-magnetic nanocomposite (RGO–Fe₃O₄) as an electrochemical sensor for trace determination of as(III) in water resources. J. Electroanal. Chem.796, 33–42. 10.1016/j.jelechem.2017.04.061

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 35

  ChoI.-H.DongH.ParkS. (2020). Electrochemical biosensors: perspective on functional nanomaterials for on-site analysis. Biomater. Res.24 (6), 1–12.

  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 36

  CintiS.ArduiniF. (2017). Graphene-based screen-printed electrochemical (Bio)Sensors and their applications: efforts and criticisms. Biosens. Bioelectron.89, 107–122. 10.1016/j.bios.2016.07.005

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 37

  CuiX.FangX.ZhaoH.LiZ.RenH. (2018). Fabrication of thiazole derivatives functionalized graphene decorated with fluorine, chlorine and iodine@SnO₂ nanoparticles for highly sensitive detection of heavy metal ions. Colloid. Surface. Physicochem. Eng. Aspect.546, 153–162. 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2018.03.004

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 38

  CullinanM. P.PalmerJ. E.CarleA. D.WestM. J.WestermanB.SeymourG. J. (2015). The influence of a triclosan toothpaste on adverse events in patients with cardiovascular disease over 5-years. Sci. Total Environ.508, 546–552. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2014.11.052

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 39

  da SilvaM. K. L.VanzelaH. C.DefavariL. M.CesarinoI. (2018). Determination of carbamate pesticide in food using a biosensor based on reduced graphene oxide and acetylcholinesterase enzyme. Sensor. Actuator. B Chem.277, 555–561. 10.1016/j.snb.2018.09.051

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 40

  DahaghinZ.KilmartinP. A.HassanZ. M. (2018). Simultaneous determination of lead(II) and cadmium(II) at a glassy carbon electrode modified with GO@Fe₃O₄@benzothiazole-2-carboxaldehyde using square wave anodic stripping voltammetry. J. Mol. Liq.249, 1125–1132. 10.1016/j.molliq.2017.11.114

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 41

  DideikinA. T.Vul’A. Y. (2019). Graphene oxide and derivatives: the place in graphene family. Front. Phys.6 (JAN). 10.3389/fphy.2018.00149

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 42

  DongS.WangZ.AsifM.WangH.YangY.HuY.et al (2017). Inkjet printing synthesis of sandwiched structured ionic liquid–carbon nanotube-graphene film: toward disposable electrode for sensitive heavy metal detection in environmental water samples. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res.56 (7), 1696–1703. 10.1021/acs.iecr.6b04251

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 43

  DuF.ZengQ.LaiZ.ChengZ.RuanG. (2019). Silicon doped graphene quantum dots combined with ruthenium(III) ions as a fluorescent probe for turn-on detection of triclosan. New J. Chem.43 (33), 12907–12915. 10.1039/c9nj03046h

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 44

  DywiliN. R.NtziouniA.IkpoC.NdipingwiM.HlongwaN. W.YonkeuA. L. D.et al (2019). Graphene oxide decorated nanometal-poly(anilino-dodecylbenzene sulfonic acid) for application in high performance supercapacitors. Micromachines.10 (2), 114. 10.3390/mi10020115

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 45

  EiglerS.HirschA. (2014). Chemistry with graphene and graphene oxide-challenges for synthetic chemists. Angew Chem. Int. Ed. Engl.53 (30), 7720–7738. 10.1002/anie.201402780

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 46

  El-ShafaiL.NagiM.El-KhoulyM. E.El-KemaryM.RamadanM. S.MasoudM. S. (2018). Graphene oxide-metal oxide nanocomposites: fabrication, characterization and removal of cationic rhodamine B dye. RSC Adv.8 (24), 13323–13332. 10.1039/c8ra00977e

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 47

  FakayodeO. J.WilliamsS.SaheedA. S.NkambuleT. T. I. (2020). Detection of humic acid in water using flat-sheet and folded-rod viscous alkaline glucose syrups. Analyst.145 (7), 2682–2691. 10.1039/c9an02083g

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 48

  FakayodeO. J.AbolanleS. A.NkambuleT. T. I. (2019b). Detection of low-level humic acid in water using room temperature-synthesized copper (I) oxide colloids. MRS Commun.1, 113. 10.1557/mrc.2019.128-6

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 49

  FakayodeO. J.AdekunleA. S.NkambuleT. T. I. (2019a). Detection of low-level humic acid in water using room temperature-synthesized copper (I) oxide colloids. MRS Commun.1, 27. 10.1557/mrc.2019.128.-6

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 50

  Faradilla Wan KhalidW. E.Mohamad NasirM. A.JasmaniL.LeeY. H. (2019). A new sensor for methyl paraben using an electrode made of a cellulose nanocrystal–reduced graphene oxide nanocomposite. Sensors.19 (12), 33. 10.3390/s19122726

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 51

  FayemiO. E.AbolanleS. A.EbensoE. E. (2016). A sensor for the determination of lindane using PANI/Zn, Fe (III) oxides and Nylon 6, 6/MWCNT/Zn, Fe (III) oxides nanofibers modified glassy carbon electrode. J. Nanomater.39, 1–10. 10.1155/2016/4049730

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 52

  FeichtP.BiskupekJ.GorelikT. E.RennerJ.HalbigC. E.MaranskaM.PuchtlerF.et al (2019). “Brodie’s or Hummers’ Method : oxidation conditions determine the structure of graphene oxide. Chem. Eur J.25, 8955–8959. 10.1002/chem.201901499

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 53

  FuJ.AnX.YaoY.GuoY.SunX. (2019). Electrochemical aptasensor based on one step Co-electrodeposition of aptamer and GO-CuNPs nanocomposite for organophosphorus pesticide detection. Sensor. Actuator. B Chem.287, 503–509. 10.1016/j.snb.2019.02.057

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 54

  GaneshH. V. S.PatelB. R.FiniH.KermanA. M.KermanK. (2019). Electrochemical detection of gallic acid-capped gold nanoparticles using a multiwalled carbon nanotube-reduced graphene oxide nanocomposite electrode. Anal. Chem.91, 10116–10124. 10.1021/acs.analchem.9b02132.M

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 55

  GaoN.HeC.MaM.CaiZ.ZhouY.ChangG.WangX.HeY. (2019). Electrochemical Co-deposition synthesis of Au-ZrO₂-Graphene nanocomposite for a nonenzymatic methyl parathion sensor. Anal. Chim. Acta.1072, 25–34. 10.1016/j.aca.2019.04.043

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 56

  GargR.DuttaN. K.ChoudhuryN. R. (2014). Work function engineering of graphene. Nanomaterials.4 (2), 267–300. 10.3390/nano4020267

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 57

  GęcaI.KorolczukM. (2017). Anodic stripping voltammetry following double deposition and stripping steps: application of a new approach in the course of lead ion determination. Talanta.171, 321–326. 10.1016/j.talanta.2017.05.008

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 58

  GeorgakilasV.OtyepkaM.BourlinosA. B.ChandraV.KimN.KempK.et al (2012). Functionalization of graphene: covalent and non-covalent approaches, derivatives and applications. Chem. Rev.112 (11), 6156–6214. 10.1021/cr3000412

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 59

  GödeC.MehmetL. Y.YılmazA.AtarN.WangS. (2017). A novel electrochemical sensor based on calixarene functionalized reduced graphene oxide: application to simultaneous determination of Fe(III), Cd(II) and Pb(II) ions. J. Colloid Interface Sci.508, 525–531. 10.1016/j.jcis.2017.08.086

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 60

  GovindhanM.AdhikariB.-R.ChenA. (2014). RSC advances nanomaterials-based electrochemical detection of chemical contaminants. RSC Adv.4, 63741–63760. 10.1039/c4ra10399h

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 61

  GuanL. Z.ZhaoL.WanY. J.TangL. C. (2018). Three-dimensional graphene-based polymer nanocomposites: preparation, properties and applications. Nanoscale.10 (31), 14788–14811. 10.1039/c8nr03044h

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 62

  GumpuM. B.VeerapandianM.KrishnanU. M.RayappanJ. B. (2017). Simultaneous electrochemical detection of Cd(II), Pb(II), as(III) and Hg(II) ions using ruthenium(II)-textured graphene oxide nanocomposite. Talanta.162, 574–582. 10.1016/j.talanta.2016.10.076.2016

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 63

  GuoZ.LiD. D.LuoX. K.ZhaoQ. N.LiM. M.ZhaoY. T.et al (2017). Simultaneous determination of trace Cd(II), Pb(II) and Cu(II) by differential pulse anodic stripping voltammetry using a reduced graphene oxide-chitosan/poly-l-lysine nanocomposite modified glassy carbon electrode. J. Colloid Interface Sci.490, 11–22. 10.1016/j.jcis.2016.11.006

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 64

  HaarhoffJ.KubareM.MambaB.KrauseR.NkambuleT.MatsebulaB.MengeJ. (2010). NOM characterization and removal at six southern african water treatment plants. Drink. Water Eng. Sci.3 (1), 53–61. 10.5194/dwes-3-53-2010

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 65

  HangT.XiaoS.ChengY.LiX.GuoC.GenH.et al (2019). Hierarchical graphene/nanorods-based H2O2 electrochemical sensor with self-cleaning and anti-biofouling properties. Sensor. Actuator. B Chem.289, 15–23. 10.1016/j.snb.2019.03.038.2018

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 66

  HanssenB. L.SirajS.WongD. K. Y. (2016). Recent strategies to minimise fouling in electrochemical detection systems. Rev. Anal. Chem.35 (1), 1–28. 10.1515/revac-2015-0008

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 67

  HeB.ShenX. F.NieJ.WangX. L.LiuF. M.YinW.et al (2018a). Electrochemical sensor using graphene/Fe₃O₄ nanosheets functionalized with garlic extract for the detection of lead ion. J. Solid State Electrochem.22 (11), 3515–3525. 10.1007/s10008-018-4041-9

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 68

  HeQ.TianY.WuY.LiuJ.LiG.DengP.et al (2019b). Electrochemical sensor for rapid and sensitive detection of tryptophan by a Cu₂O nanoparticles-coated reduced graphene oxide nanocomposite. Biomolecules.9, 176. 10.3390/biom9050176

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 69

  HeQ.TianY.WuY.LiuJ.LiG.DengP. (2019a). Facile and ultrasensitive determination of 4-nitrophenol based on acetylene black paste and graphene hybrid electrode. Nanomaterials.9 (429), 1–16. 10.3390/nano9030429

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 70

  HeQ.WuY.TianY.LiG.LiuJ.DengP.ChenD. (2018b). Facile electrochemical sensor for nanomolar rutin detection based on magnetite nanoparticles and reduced graphene oxide decorated electrode. Nanomaterials.9, 115. 10.3390/nano9010115

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 71

  Hernandez-VargasM.GustavoSosa-HernándezJ. E.Saldarriaga-HernandezS.AngelM.Villalba-RodríguezA.Parra-SaldivarR.et al (2018). Electrochemical biosensors: a solution to pollution detection with reference to environmental contaminants. Biosensors.8 (2), 1–21. 10.3390/bios8020029

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 72

  HeydariM.SarajiM.JafariM. T. (2020). Electrochemically prepared three-dimensional reduced graphene oxide-polyaniline nanocomposite as a solid-phase microextraction coating for ethion determination. Talanta.209, 120576. 10.1016/j.talanta.2019.120576.2019

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 73

  HouH.ZeinuK. M.GaoS.LiuB.YangJ.HuJ. (2018). Recent advances and perspective on design and synthesis of electrode materials for electrochemical sensing of heavy metals. Energy & Environmental Materials.1 (3), 113–131. 10.1002/eem2.12011

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 74

  HuangD. L.WangJ.FanC.AliA.GuoH. S.XiaoY.et al (2019a). Correction to: synergistic effect of a cobalt fluoroporphyrin and graphene oxide on the simultaneous voltammetric determination of catechol and hydroquinone. Microchim. Acta.186 (6), 186. 10.1007/S00604-019-3417-6

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 75

  HuangH.SuS.WuN.WanH.WanS.BiH.SunL. (2019b). Graphene-based sensors for human health monitoring. Front. Chem.7, 1–26. 10.3389/fchem.2019.00399

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 76

  HwaK. Y.Kanna SharmaT. S.GangulyA. (2020). Design strategy of RGO-HNT-AgNPs based hybrid nanocomposite with enhanced performance for electrochemical detection of 4-nitrophenol. Inorg. Chem. Front.7 (10), 1981–1994. 10.1039/d0qi00006j

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 77

  IslamM. A.MortonD. W.JohnsonB. B.AngoveM. J. (2020). Adsorption of humic and fulvic acids onto a range of adsorbents in aqueous systems, and their effect on the adsorption of other species: a review. Separ. Purif. Technol.247, 116949. 10.1016/j.seppur.2020.116949

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 78

  Jaffrezic-RenaultN.JingK.TanD.GuoZ. (2020). New trends in the electrochemical detection of endocrine disruptors in complex media. Anal. Bioanal. Chem.7, 114. 10.1007/s00216-020-02516-9

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 79

  JanA. T.AzamM.SiddiquiK.AliA.ChoiI.HaqQ. M.2015). Heavy metals and human health: mechanistic insight into toxicity and counter defense system of antioxidants. Int. J. Mol. Sci.16, 29592–29630. 10.3390/ijms161226183

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 80

  JariwalaD.SrivastavaA.AjayanP. M. (2011). Graphene synthesis and band gap opening. J. Nanosci. Nanotechnol.11 (8), 6621–6641. 10.1166/jnn.2011.5001

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 81

  JeromeR.SundramoorthyA. K. (2020). Preparation of hexagonal boron nitride doped graphene film modified sensor for selective electrochemical detection of nicotine in tobacco sample. Anal. Chim. Acta.1132, 110–120. 10.1016/j.aca.2020.07.060

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 82

  JiangC.HeY.LiuY. (2020). Recent advances in sensors for electrochemical analysis of nitrate in food and environmental matrices. Analyst.145, 5400–5413. 10.1039/d0an00823k

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 83

  JigyasaC.Kaur RajputJ. (2018). ‘ON-OFF’ novel fluorescent chemosensors based on nanoaggregates of triaryl imidazoles for superselective detection of nitro-explosive trinitrophenol in multiple solvent systems. Sensor. Actuator. B Chem.259: 990–1005. 10.1016/j.snb.2017.12.145

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 84

  JinW.MaduraiveeranG. (2018). Nanomaterial-based environmental sensing platforms using state-of-the-art electroanalytical strategies. J. Anal. Sci. Technol.9 (18), 1–11. 10.1186/s40543-018-0150-4

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 85

  KajornkavinkulS.PunratE.SiangprohW.RodthongkumN.PraphairaksitN.ChailapakulO. (2016). Graphene/polyvinylpyrrolidone/polyaniline nanocomposite-modified electrode for simultaneous determination of parabens by high performance liquid chromatography. Talanta.148, 655–660. 10.1016/j.talanta.2015.05.044

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 86

  KarthikR.Vinoth KumarJ.ShenM. C.KokulnathanT.ChenT. W.SakthinathanS.et al (2018). Development of novel 3D flower-like praseodymium molybdate decorated reduced graphene oxide: an efficient and selective electrocatalyst for the detection of acetylcholinesterase inhibitor methyl parathion. Sensor. Actuator. B Chem.270, 353–361. 10.1016/j.snb.2018.05.054.2017

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 87

  KarziV.TzatzarakisM.KatsikantamiI.StavroulakiA.AlegakisA.VakonakiE.et al (2019). Investigating exposure to endocrine disruptors via hair analysis of pregnant women. Environ. Res.178, 108692. 10.1016/j.envres.2019.108692

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 88

  KaurR.RanaS.LalitK.SinghP.KaurK. (2020). Electrochemical detection of methyl parathion via a novel biosensor tailored on highly biocompatible electrochemically reduced graphene oxide-chitosan-hemoglobin coatings. Biosens. Bioelectron.167, 112486. 10.1016/j.bios.2020.112486

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 89

  KhanM.Nawaz TahirM.Farooq AdilS.Ullah KhanH.RafiqM.SiddiquiH.et al (2015). Graphene based metal and metal oxide nanocomposites: synthesis, properties and their applications. J. Mater. Chem.3 (37), 18753–18808. 10.1039/c5ta02240a

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 90

  KhosropourH.RezaeiB.RezaeiP.EnsafiA. A. (2020). Ultrasensitive voltammetric and impedimetric aptasensor for diazinon pesticide detection by VS2 quantum dots-graphene nanoplatelets/carboxylated multiwalled carbon nanotubes as a new group nanocomposite for signal enrichment. Anal. Chim. Acta.1111, 92–102. 10.1016/j.aca.2020.03.047

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 91

  KokulnathanT.SakthinathanS.ChenS-M. (2018). Hexammine cobalt (III) coordination complex grafted reduced graphene oxide composite for sensitive and selective electrochemical. Inorg. Chem. Front.5, 1145–1155. 10.1039/c8qi00055g

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 92

  KongF. Y.LiR. F.YaoL.WangZ. X.LiH. Y.WangW. J.WangW. (2019). A novel electrochemical sensor based on Au nanoparticles/8-aminoquinoline functionalized graphene oxide nanocomposite for paraquat detection. Nanotechnology.30 (28), 285502. 10.1088/1361-6528/ab10ac

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 93

  KoçakB.ErE.ÇelikkanH. (2015). Stripping voltammetric analysis of dicofol on graphene-modified glassy carbon electrode. Ionics.21 (8), 2337–2344. 10.1007/s11581-015-1407-1

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 94

  KrishnanS. K.SinghE.SinghP.MeyyappanM.Singh NalwaH. (2019). A review on graphene-based nanocomposites for electrochemical and fluorescent biosensors. RSC Adv.9 (16), 8778–8781. 10.1039/c8ra09577a

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 95

  KumarA.PurohitB.MauryaP. K.PandeyL. M.ChandraP. (2019). Engineered nanomaterial assisted signal-amplification. Electroanalysis.31, 1615–1629. 10.1002/elan.201900216

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 96

  KumarV.KimK. H.ParkJ. W.HongJ.KumarS. (2017). Graphene and its nanocomposites as a platform for environmental applications. Chem. Eng. J.315, 210–232. 10.1016/j.cej.2017.01.008

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 97

  KuralayF.TunçS.BozdumanF.OksuzL.OksuzA. U. (2016). Biosensing applications of titanium dioxide coated graphene modified disposable electrodes. Talanta.160, 325–331. 10.1016/j.talanta.2016.07.037

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 98

  LaiR. W. S.YeungK. W. Y.YungM. M. N.DjurišićA. B.GiesyJ. P.KennethM. Y. (2018). Regulation of engineered nanomaterials: current challenges, insights and future directions. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. Int.25 (4), 3060–3077. 10.1007/s11356-017-9489-0

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 99

  LalmalsawmiJ.TiwariD.DongJ. (2020). Role of nanocomposite materials in the development of electrochemical sensors for arsenic: past, present and future. J. Electroanal. Chem.877, 114630. 10.1016/j.jelechem.2020.114630.Kim

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 100

  LatifA.BilalM.AsgharW.AzeemM.AhmadM. I.AbbasA.et al (2018). Heavy metal accumulation in vegetables and assessment of their potential health risk. J. Environ. Anal.5 (1), 1–7. 10.4172/2380-2391.1000234

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 101

  LawalA. T. (2018). Progress in utilisation of graphene for electrochemical biosensors. Biosens. Bioelectron.106, 149–178. 10.1016/j.bios.2018.01.030

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 102

  LeeC.-S.SuH.KimT. H. (2018). One-step electrochemical fabrication of reduced graphene oxide/gold nanoparticles nanocomposite-modified electrode for simultaneous detection of dopamine, ascorbic acid, and uric acid. Nanomaterials.8 (17), 112. 10.3390/nano8010017

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 103

  LeeC. W.SuhJ. M.JangH. W. (2019a). Chemical sensors based on two-dimensional (2D) materials for selective detection of ions and molecules in liquid. Front. Chem.7, 1–21. 10.3389/fchem.2019.00708

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 104

  LeeJ. H.ParkS. J.ChoiJ. W. (2019c). Electrical property of graphene and its application to electrochemical biosensing. Nanomaterials.9 (2), 7. 10.3390/nano9020297

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 105

  LeeJ-H.ParkS.-J.ChoiJ.-W. (2019b). Electrical property of graphene and its application to electrochemical biosensing. Nanomaterials.9, 297–315. 10.3390/nano9020297

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 106

  LeeK. Y.AmbrosiA.MartinP. (2017). 3D-Printed metal electrodes for heavy metals detection by anodic stripping voltammetry. Electroanalysis.29 (11), 2444–2453. 10.1002/elan.201700388

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 107

  LehutsoR. F.DasoA. P.OkonkwoJ. O. (2017). Occurrence and environmental levels of triclosan and triclocarban in selected wastewater treatment plants in gauteng Province, South Africa. Emerging Contaminants.3 (3), 107–114. 10.1016/j.emcon.2017.07.001

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 108

  LeiC.ZhangS.ZhaoS. (2017). Synthesis of N-doped graphene for simultaneous electrochemical detection of lead and copper in water. Int. J. Electrochem. Sci.12 (6), 4856–4866. 10.20964/2017.06.03

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 109

  LiD.TanW.LiZ.XuX.WangC. (2020). “Application of graphene-based materials for detection of nitrate and nitrite in water — a review. Sensors.20 (54), 1–35

  • Google Scholar

• 110

  LiF.JiangX.ZhaoJ.ZhangS. (2015). “Graphene Oxide : a promising nanomaterial for energy and environmental applications. Nanomater. Energy.16, 488–515. 10.1016/j.nanoen.2015.07.014

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 111

  LiH.HuangC.LiY.YangW. (2019). Electrocatalytic reduction of trace nitrobenzene using a graphene-oxide@polymerized-manganese-porphyrin composite. RSC Adv.9, 22523–22530. 10.1039/c9ra02932j

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 112

  LiJ.ZhangS.ChenC.ZhaoG.YangX.LiJ.WangX. (2012). Removal of Cu(II) and fulvic acid by graphene oxide nanosheets decorated with Fe3O4 nanoparticles. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces.4, 4991–5000. 10.1021/am301358b

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 113

  LiY.WangH.YanB.ZhangH. (2017). An electrochemical sensor for the determination of bisphenol A using glassy carbon electrode modified with reduced graphene oxide-silver/poly-L-lysine nanocomposites. J. Electroanal. Chem.805, 39–46. 10.1016/j.jelechem.2017.10.022

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 114

  LinX.LuZ.DaiW.LiuB.ZhangY.LiJ.YeJ. (2018). Laser engraved nitrogen-doped graphene sensor for the simultaneous determination of Cd(II) and Pb(II). J. Electroanal. Chem.828, 41–49. 10.1016/j.jelechem.2018.09.016

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 115

  LingamdinneL. P.Reddy KoduruJ. (2018). Magnetic graphene oxide composites are the solutions for sustainable remediation of ecosystems. Environ. Anal. Ecol. Stud.2, 2–5. 10.31031/EAES.2018.02.000528

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 116

  LingamdinneL. P.KoduruJ. R.KarriR. R. (20192018). A comprehensive review of applications of magnetic graphene oxide based nanocomposites for sustainable water purification. J. Environ. Manag.231, 622–634. 10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.10.063

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 117

  LiuF. M.ZhangY.YinW.ChangJ. H.HuoD. Q.HeBin.et al (2017). A high–selectivity electrochemical sensor for ultra-trace lead (II) detection based on a nanocomposite consisting of nitrogen-doped graphene/gold nanoparticles functionalized with ETBD and Fe3O4@TiO2 core–shell nanoparticles. Sensor. Actuator. B Chem.242, 889–896. 10.1016/j.snb.2016.09.167

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 118

  LiuX.LiZ.DingR.RenB.LiY. (2016). A nanocarbon paste electrode modified with nitrogen-doped graphene for square wave anodic stripping voltammetric determination of trace lead and cadmium. Microchimica Acta.183 (2), 709–714. 10.1007/s00604-015-1713-3

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 119

  MaC.ChenM.LiuH.WuK.HeH.WangK. (2018). A rapid method for the detection of humic acid based on the poly(thymine)-templated copper nanoparticles. Chin. Chem. Lett.29 (1), 136–138. 10.1016/j.cclet.2017.09.012

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 120

  MagesaF.WuY.TianY.Mary VianneyJ.BuzaJ.HeQ.et al (2019). Graphene and graphene like 2D graphitic carbon nitride: electrochemical detection of food colorants and toxic substances in environment. Trends Environ. Anal. Chem.23, e00064. 10.1016/j.teac.2019.e00064

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 121

  MahmudM. A. P.EjeianF.AzadiS.MyersM.PejcicB.AbbassiR.et al (2020). Recent progress in sensing nitrate , nitrite , Phosphate , and ammonium in aquatic environment. Chemosphere.259, 127492. 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.127492

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 122

  MalakootianM.HamzehS.Mahmoudi-moghaddamH. (2020). A new electrochemical sensor for simultaneous determination of Cd ( II ) and Pb ( II ) using FeNi₃/CuS/BiOCl : RSM optimization. Microchem. J.158, 1–10. 10.1016/j.microc.2020.105194

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 123

  ManavalanS.VeerakumarP.ChenS. M.KingC. (2020). Three-dimensional zinc oxide nanostars anchored on graphene oxide for voltammetric determination of methyl parathion. Microchimica Acta.187 (1), 33. 10.1007/s00604-019-4031-3

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 124

  ManikandanV. S.SidhureddyB.ThiruppathiA. R.ChenA. (2019). Sensitive electrochemical detection of caffeic acid in wine based on fluorine-doped graphene oxide. Sensors.19 (1604), 1–16. 10.3390/s19071604

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 125

  MartonM.MichniakP.BehulM.RehacekV.Vojs StanovaA.RedhammerR.et al (2019). Bismuth modified boron doped diamond electrode for simultaneous determination of Zn, Cd and Pb ions by square wave anodic stripping voltammetry: influence of boron concentration and surface morphology. Vacuum.167, 182–188. 10.1016/j.vacuum.2019.06.012

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 126

  MehtaJ.BhardwajN.BhardwajS. K.TutejaS. K.VinayakP.PaulA. K.et al (2017). Graphene quantum dot modified screen printed immunosensor for the determination of parathion. Anal. Biochem.523, 1–9. 10.1016/j.ab.2017.01.026

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 127

  MendonçaC. D.PradoT. M.CincottoF. H.VerbinnenR. T.SergioA. S. M (2017). Methylparaben quantification via electrochemical sensor based on reduced graphene oxide decorated with ruthenium nanoparticles. Sensor. Actuator. B Chem.251, 739–745. 10.1016/j.snb.2017.05.083

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 128

  MiglioriniF. L.SanfeliceR. C.MercanteL. A.FacureM. H. M.CorreaD. S. (2020). Electrochemical sensor based on polyamide 6/polypyrrole electrospun nanofibers coated with reduced graphene oxide for malathion pesticide detection. Mater. Res. Express.7 (1). 10.1088/2053-1591/ab5744

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 129

  MohanV. B.LauK. T.HuiD.BhattacharyyaD. (2018). Graphene-based materials and their composites: a review on production, applications and product limitations. Compos. B Eng.142, 200–220. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2018.01.013

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 130

  MolinaJ.CasesF.MorettoL. M. (2016). Graphene-based materials for the electrochemical determination of hazardous ions. Anal. Chim. Acta.946, 9–39. 10.1016/j.aca.2016.10.019

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 131

  MolinariR.ArgurioP. (2017). Arsenic removal from water by coupling Photocatalysis and complexation-ultrafiltration processes: a Preliminary study. Water Res.109, 327–336. 10.1016/j.watres.2016.11.054

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 132

  MontaseriH.ForbesP. B. C. (2018). A triclosan turn-ON fluorescence sensor based on thiol-capped core/shell quantum dots. Spectrochim. Acta Mol. Biomol. Spectrosc.204, 370–379. 10.1016/j.saa.2018.06.043

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 133

  MoroG.De WaelK.Maria MorettoL. (2019). Electrochemistry challenges in the electrochemical (bio) sensing of nonelectroactive food and environmental contaminants. Current Opinion in Electrochemistry.16, 57–65. 10.1016/j.coelec.2019.04.019

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 134

  MoyoM.FlorenceL. R.OkonkwoJ. O. (2015). Improved electro-oxidation of triclosan at nano-zinc oxide-multiwalled carbon nanotube modified glassy carbon electrode. Sensor. Actuator. B Chem.209, 898–905. 10.1016/j.snb.2014.12.059

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 135

  MoyoW.ChaukuraN.TitusA.MsagatiM.MambaB. B.HeijmanS. G. J.NkambuleT. T. I. (2019). The properties and removal efficacies of natural organic matter fractions by South African drinking water treatment plants. J. Environ. Chem. Eng.7 (3), 103101. 10.1016/j.jece.2019.103101

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 136

  MuñozJ.Álvarez-PradaI.Lopez-LopezE.EscricheL.RomeroN.SalaX.et al (2020). Synthesis of 0D to 3D hybrid-carbon nanomaterials carrying platinum(0) nanoparticles: towards the electrocatalytic determination of methylparabens at ultra-trace levels. Sensor. Actuator. B Chem.305, 127467. 10.1016/j.snb.2019.127467

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 137

  MuruganC.MuruganN.SundramoorthyA. K.SundaramurthyA. (2020). “Gradient triple-layered ZnS/ZnO/Ta₂O₅−SiO₂ core−shell nanoparticles for enzyme-based electrochemical detection of cancer biomarkers. ACS Appl. Nano Mater.3, 8461–8471. 10.1021/acsanm.0c01949

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 138

  MuthoosamyK.ManickamS. (2017). State of the art and recent advances in the ultrasound-assisted synthesis, exfoliation and functionalization of graphene derivatives. Ultrason. Sonochem.39, 478–493. 10.1016/j.ultsonch.2017.05.019

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 139

  NagA.MitraA.MukhopadhyayS. C. (2018). Graphene and its sensor-based applications: a review. Sens. Actuators, A.270, 177–194. 10.1016/j.sna.2017.12.028

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 140

  NagarajanR. D.SundramoorthyA. K. (2019). One-pot electrosynthesis of silver nanorods/graphene nanocomposite using 4-sulphocalix [4] arene for selective detection of oxalic acid. Sensor. Actuator. B Chem.301, 127132. 10.1016/j.snb.2019.127132

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 141

  NagaraniS.SasikalaG.SatheeshK.YuvarajM.JayavelR. (2018). Synthesis and characterization of binary transition metal oxide/reduced graphene oxide nanocomposites and its enhanced electrochemical properties for supercapacitor applications. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Electron.29 (14), 11738–11748. 10.1007/s10854-018-9272-0

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 142

  NkambuleT. I.KrauseR. W.MambaB. B.HaarhoffJ. (2009). Removal of natural organic matter from water using ion-exchange resins and cyclodextrin Polyurethanes. Phys. Chem. Earth.34 (13–16), 812–818. 10.1016/j.pce.2009.07.013

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 143

  NkambuleT. I.KrauseR. W. M.HaarhoffJ.MambaB. B. (2012). Natural organic matter (NOM) in South African waters: NOM characterisation using combined assessment techniques. WaterSA.38 (5), 697–706. 10.4314/wsa.v38i5.7

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 144

  NumanA.GillA. A. S.RafiqueS.GuduriM.ZhanY.MaddiboyinaB.et al (2020). Rationally engineered nanosensors: a novel strategy for the detection of heavy metal ions in the environment. J. Hazard Mater.7, 124493. 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2020.124493

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 145

  OliveiraT. M. B. F.MoraisS. (2018). New generation of electrochemical sensors based on multi-walled carbon nanotubes. Appl. Sci.8 (10), 5–7. 10.3390/app8101925

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 146

  OliveiraT. M. B. F.RibeiroF. W. P.SousaC. P.Salazar-BandaG. R.Pedro de Lima-NetoA. N. C.MoraisS. (2020). Current overview and perspectives on carbon-based (Bio)Sensors for carbamate pesticides electroanalysis. Trac. Trends Anal. Chem.124, 115779. 10.1016/j.trac.2019.115779

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 147

  OrrS. E.BridgesC. C. (2017). Chronic kidney disease and exposure to nephrotoxic metals. Int. J. Mol. Sci.18 (1039), 1–35. 10.3390/ijms18051039

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 148

  Ould NeM. L.AbbassiA.El hachimiA. G.BenyoussefA.Ez-ZahraouyH.El KenzA. (2017). Electronic optical, properties and widening band gap of graphene with Ge doping. Opt. Quant. Electron.49 (6), 1–13. 10.1007/s11082-017-1024-5

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 149

  ÖzcanA.TopçuoğullarıD.Atılır ÖzcanA. (2019). Fenitrothion sensing with reduced graphene oxide decorated fumed silica nanocomposite modified glassy carbon electrode. Sensor. Actuator. B Chem.284, 179–185. 10.1016/j.snb.2018.12.122

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 150

  PajooheshpourN.RezaeiM.AliH.AfkhamiA.SillanpääM.ArduiniF.et al (2018). Protein templated Au–Pt nanoclusters-graphene nanoribbons as a high performance sensing layer for the electrochemical determination of diazinon. Sensor. Actuator. B Chem.275, 180–189. 10.1016/j.snb.2018.08.014

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 151

  PandeyS. K.SachanS.SinghS. K. (2019). Ultra-trace sensing of cadmium and lead by square wave anodic stripping voltammetry using ionic liquid modified graphene oxide. Mater. Sci. Energy Technol.2 (3), 667–675. 10.1016/j.mset.2019.09.004

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 152

  PangY. H.HuangY. Y.WangL.ShenX. F.WangY. Y. (2020). Determination of bisphenol A and bisphenol S by a covalent organic framework electrochemical sensor. Environ. Pollut.263, 114616. 10.1016/j.envpol.2020.114616

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 153

  PavittA. S.TratnyekP. G. (2019). Electrochemical characterization of natural organic matter by direct voltammetry in an aprotic solvent. Environ. Sci.: Processes Impacts.21 (10), 1664–1683. 10.1039/c9em00313d

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 154

  PeiJ.XiangY.ZhangZ.ZhangJ.WeiS.BoukherroubR. (2020). In-Situ graphene modified self-supported boron-doped diamond electrode for Pb(II) electrochemical detection in seawater. Appl. Surf. Sci.527, 146761. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2020.146761

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 155

  Pelin BökeC.KaramanO.MedetalibeyogluH.KaramanC.AtarN.Lütfi YolaM. (2020). A new approach for electrochemical detection of organochlorine compound lindane: development of molecular imprinting polymer with polyoxometalate/carbon nitride nanotubes composite and validation. Microchem. J.157, 105012. 10.1016/j.microc.2020.105012

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 156

  Pellicer-CastellE.Belenguer-SapiñaC.AmorósP.El HaskouriJ.Herrero-MartínezJ. M.Mauri-AucejoA. R.et al (2020). Comparison of silica-based materials for organophosphorus pesticides sampling and occupational risk assessment. Anal. Chim. Acta.1110, 26–34. 10.1016/j.aca.2020.03.008

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 157

  Peña-BahamondeJ.NguyenH. N.FanourakisS. K.RodriguesD. F. (2018). Recent advances in graphene-based biosensor technology with applications in life sciences. J. Nanobiotechnol.16 (1), 75–17. 10.1186/s12951-018-0400-z

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 158

  PerreaultF.Fonseca de FariaA.ElimelechM. (2015). Environmental applications of graphene-based nanomaterials. Chem. Soc. Rev.44 (16), 5861–5896. 10.1039/c5cs00021a

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 159

  PiovesanJ. V.SantanaE. R.SpinelliA. (2018). Reduced graphene oxide/gold nanoparticles nanocomposite-modified glassy carbon electrode for determination of endocrine disruptor methylparaben. J. Electroanal. Chem.813, 163–170. 10.1016/j.jelechem.2018.02.025

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 160

  PratushA.KumarA.HuZ. (2018). Adverse effect of heavy metals (As, Pb, Hg, and Cr) on health and their bioremediation strategies: a review. Int. Microbiol.21, 97–106. 10.1007/s10123-018-0012-3

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 161

  PriyaT.DhanalakshmiN.ThennarasuS.ThinakaranN. (2018). A novel voltammetric sensor for the simultaneous detection of Cd. Carbohydr. Polym.182, 199–206. 10.1016/j.carbpol.2017.11.0172017

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 162

  QinL.ZengG.CuiL.HuangD.ZhangC.ChengM.et al (2019). Science of the total environment synthetic strategies and application of gold-based nanocatalysts for nitroaromatics reduction. Sci. Total Environ.652, 93–116. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.10.215

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 163

  QuX.AlvarezP. J. J.QilinLi. (2013). Applications of Nanotechnology in water and wastewater treatment. Water Res.47 (12), 3931–3946. 10.1016/j.watres.2012.09.058

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 164

  RahmaniT..BagheriH..BehbahaniM.AliH.AfkhamiA. (2018). Modified 3D graphene-Au as a novel sensing layer for direct and sensitive electrochemical determination of carbaryl pesticide in fruit, vegetable, and water samples. Food Anal. Methods.11 (11), 3005–3014. 10.1007/s12161-018-1280-4

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 165

  RajajiU.MuruganK.ShenM.GovindasamyM.ChenT. W.LinP. H.et al (2019). Graphene oxide encapsulated 3D porous chalcopyrite (CuFeS2) nanocomposite as an emerging electrocatalyst for agro-hazardous (methyl Paraoxon) detection in vegetables. Compos. B Eng.160, 268–276. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2018.10.042

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 166

  RamachandranA.Karunakaran YesodhaS. (2019). Polyaniline-derived nitrogen-doped graphene quantum dots for the ultratrace level electrochemical detection of trinitrophenol and the effective differentiation of nitroaromatics: structure matters. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng.7, 6732–6743. 10.1021/acssuschemeng.8b05996

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 167

  RamachandranT.DhayabaranV. (2019). Utilization of a MnO2/polythiophene/RGO nanocomposite modified glassy carbon electrode as an electrochemical sensor for methyl parathion. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Electron.30 (13), 12315–12327. 10.1007/s10854-019-01590-9

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 168

  RarilC.ManjunathaJ. G. (2020). Fabrication of novel polymer-modified graphene-based electrochemical sensor for the determination of mercury and lead ions in water and biological samples. J. Anal. Sci. Technol.11 (1). 10.1186/s40543-019-0194-0

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 169

  RayS. K.MajumderC.SahaP. (2017). Functionalized reduced graphene oxide (FRGO) for removal of fulvic acid contaminant. RSC Adv.7 (35), 21768–21779. 10.1039/c7ra01069a

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 170

  RehmanK.FatimaF.WaheedI.AkashM. S. H.20182017). Prevalence of exposure of heavy metals and their impact on health consequences. J. Cell. Biochem.119, 157–184. 10.1002/jcb.26234

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 171

  RenH.ZhangY.LiuL.LiY.WangD.ZhangR.et al (2019). Synthesis of hollow Mo2C/carbon spheres, and their application to simultaneous electrochemical detection of hydroquinone, catechol, and resorcinol. Microchimica Acta.186 (5). 10.1007/s00604-019-3432-7

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 172

  RoosminiD.NotodarmojoS.SururiM. R. (2018). The characteristic of natural organic matter (NOM) of water from cikapundung river Pond. IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci.160 (1). 10.1088/1755-1315/160/1/012021

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 173

  Rowley-NealeS.SamuelJ.RandviirE. P.AhmedAbo DenaS.BanksC. E. (2018). An overview of recent applications of reduced graphene oxide as a Basis of electroanalytical sensing platforms. Appl. Mater. Today.10, 218–226. 10.1016/j.apmt.2017.11.010

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 174

  RuengpirasiriP.PunratE.ChailapakulO.ChuanuwatanakulS. (2017). Graphene oxide-modified electrode coated with in-Situ antimony film for the simultaneous determination of heavy metals by sequential injection-anodic stripping voltammetry. Electroanalysis.29 (4), 1022–1030. 10.1002/elan.201600568

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 175

  SakthinathanS.ChenS. M. (2015). Graphene supported nanocomposite for electrochemical detection of pollutant materials: a short review. Int. J. Electrochem. Sci.10 (8), 6527–6536. 10.21741/9781644900956-8

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 176

  SakthinathanS.KubendhiranS.ShenM.TamizhduraiP. (2016). Reduced graphene oxide/gold tetraphenyl porphyrin (RGO/Au-TPP) nanocomposite as an ultrasensitive amperometric sensor for environmentally toxic hydrazine. RSC Adv.6 (61), 56375–56383. 10.1039/c6ra09129f.Chen

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 177

  SalihE.MekawyM.HassanR. Y. A. (2016). Synthesis , characterization and electrochemical-sensor applications of zinc oxide/graphene oxide nanocomposite. J. Nanostruct. Chem.6 (2), 137–144. 10.1007/s40097-016-0188-z

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 178

  SaljooqiA.ShamspurT.AliM. (2020). A sensitive electrochemical sensor based on graphene oxide nanosheets decorated by Fe₃O₄@Au nanostructure stabilized on polypyrrole for efficient triclosan sensing. Electroanalysis.32 (6), 1297–1303. 10.1002/elan.201900634

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 179

  SantanaE. R.SpinelliA. (2020). Electrode modified with graphene quantum dots supported in chitosan for electrochemical methods and non-linear deconvolution of spectra for spectrometric methods: approaches for simultaneous determination of triclosan and methylparaben. Mikrochim. Acta.187 (4), 250–312. 10.1007/s00604-020-04225-7

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 180

  SantanaP.LimaJ.SantanaT.SantosL.MatosC.da CostaL.et al (2019). Semiconductor nanocrystals-reduced graphene composites for the electrochemical detection of carbendazim. J. Braz. Chem. Soc.30 (6), 1302–1308. 10.21577/0103-5053.20190026

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 181

  SärkkäH.VepsäläinenM.SillanpääM. (2015). Natural organic matter (NOM) removal by electrochemical methods - a review. J. Electroanal. Chem.755, 100–108. 10.1016/j.jelechem.2015.07.029

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 182

  SarnoM.ScudieriC.PonticorvoE. (2019). Flower-like AuPtPd-Fe3O4 nanocatalyst for electrochemical removal of humic acids and Cr(VI). Chem. Eng. Trans.73, 229–234. 10.3303/CET1973039

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 183

  SgobbiL. F.MachadoS. A. S. (20182017). Functionalized Polyacrylamide as an acetylcholinesterase-inspired Biomimetic device for electrochemical sensing of organophosphorus pesticides. Biosens. Bioelectron.100, 290. 10.1016/j.bios.2017.09.019

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 184

  ShaR.Kumar PuttapatiS.VSS SrikanthV.BadhulikaS. (2017). Ultra-sensitive phenol sensor based on overcoming surface fouling of reduced graphene oxide-zinc oxide composite electrode. J. Electroanal. Chem.785, 26–32. 10.1016/j.jelechem.2016.12.001

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 185

  ShahzadF.ZaidiS. A.KooC. M. (2017). Synthesis of multifunctional electrically tunable fluorine-doped reduced graphene oxide at low temperatures. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces.9 (28), 24179–24189. 10.1021/acsami.7b05021

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 186

  SharmaP.NainR.ChaudharyS.KumarR. (2020). Architectonical frameworks of porous graphene: a potential stratagem to combat nanocontamination in the environment. Environ. Nanotechnol. Monitor. Manag.14, 100298. 10.1016/j.enmm.2020.100298

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 187

  SharmaS.BhattacharyaA. (2017). Drinking water contamination and treatment techniques. Appl. Water Sci.7 (3), 1043–1067. 10.1007/s13201-016-0455-7

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 188

  ShendeP.SardesaiM.GaudR. S. (2018). “Micro to nanoneedles: a trend of modernized transepidermal drug delivery system.” artificial cells. Nanomed. Biotechnol.46 (1), 19–25. 10.1080/21691401.2017.1304409

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 189

  ShiL.LiY.RongX.WangY.DingS. (2017a). Facile fabrication of a novel 3D graphene framework/Bi nanoparticle film for ultrasensitive electrochemical assays of heavy metal ions. Anal. Chim. Acta.968, 21–29. 10.1016/j.aca.2017.03.013

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 190

  ShiR.LiangJ.ZhaoZ.LiuA.TianY. (2017b). An electrochemical bisphenol A sensor based on one step electrochemical reduction of cuprous oxide wrapped graphene oxide nanoparticles modified electrode. Talanta.169, 37–43. 10.1016/j.talanta.2017.03.042

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 191

  ShtepliukI.YakimovaR. (2019). Interaction of epitaxial graphene with heavy metals: towards novel sensing platform. Nanotechnology.30 (29, 294002). 10.1088/1361-6528/ab1546

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 192

  SiY.LiuJ.ChenY.MiaoX.YeF.LiuZ.et al (2018). RGO/AuNPs/Tetraphenylporphyrin nanoconjugate-based electrochemical sensor for highly sensitive detection of cadmium ions. Anal. Methods.10 (29), 3631–3636. 10.1039/c8ay01020j

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 193

  SillanpääM.Chaker NcibiM.MatilainenA.VepsäläinenM. (2018). Removal of natural organic matter in drinking water treatment by coagulation: a comprehensive review. Chemosphere.190, 54–71. 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2017.09.113

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 194

  SilwanaB.Van Der HorstC.IwuohaE.SomersetV. (2016). A Brief review on recent developments of electrochemical sensors in environmental application for PGMs. J. Environ. Sci. Health. A Tox. Hazard Subst. Environ. Eng.51 (14), 1233–1247. 10.1080/10934529.2016.1212562

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 195

  SkS.RahamanA.ShahadatM.BasuS.ShaikhZ. A.Wazed AliS. (2019). Polyaniline/carbon nanotube-graphite modified electrode sensor for detection of bisphenol A. Ionics.25 (6), 2857–2864. 10.1007/s11581-018-2807-9

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 196

  SmithA. T.AnnaM. L. C.SongshanZ.BinL.LuyiS. (2019). Synthesis, properties, and applications of graphene oxide/reduced graphene oxide and their nanocomposites. Nano Mater. Sci.1 (1), 31–47. 10.1016/j.nanoms.2019.02.004

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 197

  SongY.LuoY.ZhuC.LiH.DuD.LinY. (2016). Recent advances in electrochemical biosensors based on graphene two-dimensional nanomaterials. Biosens. Bioelectron.76, 195–212. 10.1016/j.bios.2015.07.002

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 198

  StortiniA. M.Antonietta BaldoM.MoroG.PoloF.Maria MorettoL. (2020). Bio- and biomimetic receptors for electrochemical sensing of heavy metal ions. Sensors.20, 1–29. 10.3390/s20236800

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 199

  SturalaJ.JanL.MartinP.SoferZ. (2018). Chemistry of graphene derivatives: synthesis, applications, and perspectives. Chem. Eur J.24 (23), 5992–6006. 10.1002/chem.201704192

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 200

  SuS.ChenS.FanC. (2018). Recent advances in two-dimensional nanomaterials-based electrochemical sensors for environmental analysis. Green Energy and Environment.3 (2), 97–106. 10.1016/j.gee.2017.08.005

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 201

  SuhermanA. L.TannerE. E. L.ComptonR. G. (2017). Recent developments in inorganic Hg2+ detection by voltammetry. Trac. Trends Anal. Chem.94, 161–172. 10.1016/j.trac.2017.07.020

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 202

  SunJ.GuoF.ShiQ.WuH.SunY.ChenM.DiaoG. (2019a). Electrochemical detection of paraquat based on silver nanoparticles/water-soluble pillar[5]Arene functionalized graphene oxide modified glassy carbon electrode. J. Electroanal. Chem.847 (May), 113221. 10.1016/j.jelechem.2019.113221

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 203

  SunY. F.Jian-WangY.PeiH.YangM.XingJ. H. (2019b). Highly sensitive electrochemical detection of Pb(II) based on excellent adsorption and surface Ni(II)/Ni(III) cycle of porous flower-like NiO/RGO nanocomposite. Sensor. Actuator. B Chem.292, 136–147. 10.1016/j.snb.2019.04.131Li

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 204

  SuvarnaphaetP.PechprasarnS. (2017). Graphene-based materials for biosensors: a review. Sensors.17 (10), 33. 10.3390/s17102161

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 205

  SuvinaV.KokulnathanT.WangT. J.BalakrishnaR. G. (2020). Lanthanum cobaltite supported on graphene nanosheets for non-enzymatic electrochemical determination of catechol. Mikrochim. Acta.187 (189), 189–197. 10.1007/s00604-020-4165-3

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 206

  TalirzL.RuffieuxP.FaselR. (2016). On-surface synthesis of atomically precise graphene nanoribbons. Adv Mater Weinheim.28 (29), 6222–6231. 10.1002/adma.201505738

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 207

  TanX.LiuY.ZhangT.LuoS.LiuX.TianH.et al (2019). Ultrasensitive electrochemical detection of methyl parathion pesticide based on cationic water-soluble pillar[5]Arene and reduced graphene nanocomposite. RSC Adv.9 (1), 345–353. 10.1039/C8RA08555B

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 208

  TeixeiraP. R.MachadoT. R.MachadoF.SodréF. F.SilvaJ. G.NetoB. A. D.et al (2020). Au nanoparticle-poly(ionic liquid) nanocomposite electrode for the voltammetric detection of triclosan in lake water and toothpaste samples. Microchem. J.152, 104421. 10.1016/j.microc.2019.104421

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 209

  ThangamuthuM.HsiehK. Yu.KumarP. V.GuanY. (2019). Graphene- and graphene oxide-based nanocomposite platforms for electrochemical biosensing applications. Int. J. Mol. Sci.20 (12), 1–25. 10.3390/ijms20122975

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 210

  TheyagarajanK.ElancheziyanM.AayushiP. S.ThenmozhiK. (2020a). Facile strategy for immobilizing horseradish peroxidase on a novel acetate functionalized ionic liquid/MWCNT matrix for electrochemical biosensing. Int. J. Biol. Macromol.163, 358–365. 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2020.07.005

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 211

  TheyagarajanK.YadavS.SatijaJ.ThenmozhiK.SenthilkumarS. (2020b). Gold nanoparticle-redox ionic liquid based nanoconjugated matrix as a novel multifunctional biosensing interface. ACS Biomater. Sci. Eng.6, 6076–6085. 10.1021/acsbiomaterials.0c00807

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 212

  ThiruppathiA. R.SidhureddyB.KeelerW.ChenA. (2017). Facile one-pot synthesis of fluorinated graphene oxide for electrochemical sensing of heavy metal ions. Electrochem. Commun.76, 42–46. 10.1016/j.elecom.2017.01.015

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 213

  TianB.KouY.JiangX.LuJ.XueY.WangM.TanL. (2020). Ultrasensitive determination of mercury ions using a glassy carbon electrode modified with nanocomposites consisting of conductive polymer and amino-functionalized graphene quantum dots. Mikrochim. Acta.187 (4), 210. 10.1007/s00604-020-4191-1

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 214

  TianX.LiuL.LiY.YangC.ZhouZ.NieY.et al (2018). Nonenzymatic electrochemical sensor based on CuO–TiO₂ for sensitive and selective detection of methyl parathion pesticide in ground water. Sensor. Actuator. B Chem.256, 135–142. 10.1016/j.snb.2017.10.066

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 215

  TiwariS. K.RaghvendraK. M.Sung KyuH.AndrzejH. (2018). Evolution of graphene oxide and graphene: from imagination to industrialization. ChemNanoMat.4 (7), 598–620. 10.1002/cnma.201800089

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 216

  TurkaslanB. E.MihraceS. A. (2020). Optimizing parameters of graphene derivatives synthesis by modified improved Hummers. Math. Methods Appl. Sci.7, 13. 10.1002/mma.6704

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 217

  UllahN.ManshaM.KhanI.QurashiA. (2018). Nanomaterial-based optical chemical sensors for the detection of heavy metals in water: recent advances and challenges. Trac. Trends Anal. Chem.100, 155–166. 10.1016/j.trac.2018.01.002

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 218

  VenuM.VenkateswarluS.ReddyY. V. M.Seshadri ReddyA.GuptaV. K.YoonM.MadhaviG. (2018). Highly sensitive electrochemical sensor for anticancer drug by a zirconia nanoparticle-decorated reduced graphene oxide nanocomposite. ACS Omega.3 (11), 14597–14605. 10.1021/acsomega.8b02129

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 219

  WaheedA.ManshaM.UllahN. (2018). Nanomaterials-based electrochemical detection of heavy metals in water: current status, challenges and future direction. Trac. Trends Anal. Chem.105, 37–51. 10.1016/j.trac.2018.04.012

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 220

  WanX.LeiM.ChenT. (2020). Review on remediation technologies for arsenic- contaminated soil. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng.14 (2), 1–14

  • Google Scholar

• 221

  WangH.YuanX.ZengG.WuY.LiuY.JiangQ.GuS. (2015). Three dimensional graphene based materials: synthesis and applications from energy storage and conversion to electrochemical sensor and environmental remediation. Adv. Colloid Interface Sci.221, 41–59. 10.1016/j.cis.2015.04.005

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 222

  WangL.PengX.FuH.HuangC.LiY.LiuZ. (2020). Recent advances in the development of electrochemical aptasensors for detection of heavy metals in food. Biosens. Bioelectron.147, 111777. 10.1016/j.bios.2019.111777

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 223

  WangL.KimJ.CuiT. (2018). Self-assembled graphene and copper nanoparticles composite sensor for nitrate determination. Microsyst. Technol.24 (9), 3623–3630. 10.1007/s00542-018-3792-7

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 224

  WangY.ZhaoS.LiM.LiW.ZhaoY.QiJ.CuiX. (2017). Graphene quantum dots decorated graphene as an enhanced sensing platform for sensitive and selective detection of copper(II). J. Electroanal. Chem.797, 113–120. 10.1016/j.jelechem.2017.05.031

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 225

  WenG. L.ZhaoW.ChenX.JiaQ.WangY.ZhangY.et al (2018). N-doped reduced graphene oxide/MnO2 nanocomposite for electrochemical detection of Hg2+ by square wave stripping voltammetry. Electrochim. Acta.291, 95–102. 10.1016/j.electacta.2018.08.121

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 226

  WillnerM. R.VikeslandP. J. (2018). Nanomaterial enabled sensors for environmental contaminants. J. Nanobiotechnol.16, 95. 10.1186/s12951-018-0419-1.-16

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 227

  WongkaewN.SimsekM.GriescheC.BaeumnerA. J.Baeumner (2019). Functional nanomaterials and nanostructures enhancing electrochemical biosensors and lab-on-a-chip performances: recent progress, applications, and future perspective. Chem. Rev.119 (1), 120–194. 10.1021/acs.chemrev.8b00172

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 228

  WuT.LiT.LiuZ.GuoY.DongC. (2017). Electrochemical sensor for sensitive detection of triclosan based on graphene/palladium nanoparticles hybrids. Talanta.164, 556–562. 10.1016/j.talanta.2016.12.027

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 229

  XiaoF.LiH.YanX.YanL.ZhangX.WangM.et al (2020). Graphitic carbon nitride/graphene oxide(g-C3N4/GO) nanocomposites covalently linked with ferrocene containing dendrimer for ultrasensitive detection of pesticide. Anal. Chim. Acta.1103, 84–96. 10.1016/j.aca.2019.12.066

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 230

  XiaoL.WangB.JiL.WangF.YuanQ.HuG.et al (2016). An efficient electrochemical sensor based on three-dimensionally interconnected mesoporous graphene framework for simultaneous determination of Cd(II) and Pb(II). Electrochim. Acta.222, 1371–1377. 10.1016/j.electacta.2016.11.113

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 231

  XieY.YuY.LuL.XueM.GongL.HuangX.et al (2018). CuO nanoparticles decorated 3D graphene nanocomposite as non-enzymatic electrochemical sensing platform for malathion detection. J. Electroanal. Chem.812, 82–89. 10.1016/j.jelechem.2018.01.043

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 232

  XuJ.WangY.HuS. (2017). Nanocomposites of graphene and graphene oxides: synthesis, molecular functionalization and application in electrochemical sensors and biosensors. A review. Microchimica Acta.184 (1), 1–44. 10.1007/s00604-016-2007-0

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 233

  YanL.YanX.LiH.ZhangX.WangM.FuS.et al (2020a). Reduced graphene oxide nanosheets and gold nanoparticles covalently linked to ferrocene-terminated dendrimer to construct electrochemical sensor with dual signal amplification strategy for ultra-sensitive detection of pesticide in vegetable. Microchem. J.157, 105016. 10.1016/j.microc.2020.105016

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 234

  YanL.YanX.LiH.ZhangX.WangM.FuS.et al (2020b). Reduced graphene oxide nanosheets and gold nanoparticles covalently linked to ferrocene-terminated dendrimer to construct electrochemical sensor with dual signal amplification strategy for ultra-sensitive detection of pesticide in vegetable. Microchem. J.157, 105016. 10.1016/j.microc.2020.105016

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 235

  YanZ.YaoW.HuL.LiuD.WangC.LeeC. S. (2015). Progress in the preparation and application of three-dimensional graphene-based porous nanocomposites. Nanoscale.7 (13), 5563–5577. 10.1039/c5nr00030k

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 236

  YeT.ChenW.XuH.GengN.CaiY. (2018). Preparation of TiO2/graphene composite with appropriate N-doping ratio for humic acid removal. J. Mater. Sci.53 (1), 613–625. 10.1007/s10853-017-1509-4

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 237

  YilongZ.ZhaoD.LiD. (2015). Electrochemical and other methods for detection and determination of dissolved Nitrite : a review. Int. J. Electrochem. Sci.10, 1144–1168. 10.3403/00082406u

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 238

  YinP. T.ShahS.ChhowallaM.LeeK. B. (2015). Design, synthesis, and characterization of graphene-nanoparticle hybrid materials for bioapplications. Chem. Rev.115 (7), 2483–2531. 10.1021/cr500537t

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 239

  YolaM. L.AtarN.ErenT.Karimi-MalehH.WangS. (2015). Sensitive and selective determination of aqueous triclosan based on gold nanoparticles on polyoxometalate/reduced graphene oxide nanohybrid. RSC Adv.5 (81), 65953–65962. 10.1039/c5ra07443f

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 240

  YolaM. L. (2019). Electrochemical activity enhancement of monodisperse boron nitride quantum dots on graphene oxide: its application for simultaneous detection of organophosphate pesticides in real samples. J. Mol. Liq.277, 50–57. 10.1016/j.molliq.2018.12.084

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 241

  YuH.XiaoF.ChenX. X.JinL.GaoX. L.XuN.et al (2017). Electrochemical determination of bisphenol A on a glassy carbon electrode modified with gold nanoparticles loaded on reduced graphene oxide-multi walled carbon nanotubes composite. Chin. J. Anal. Chem.45 (5), 713–720. 10.1016/S1872-2040(17)61014-4

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 242

  YuL.XuQ.JinD.ZhangQ.MaoA.ShuY.et al (2016). Highly sensitive electrochemical determination of sulfate in PM2.5 based on the formation of heteropoly blue at poly-l-lysine-functionalized graphene modified glassy carbon electrode in the presence of cetyltrimethylammonium bromide. Chem. Eng. J.294, 122–131. 10.1016/j.cej.2016.02.063

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 243

  ZaabaN. I.FooK. L.HashimU.TanS. J.LiuWei. Wen.VoonC. H. (2017). Synthesis of graphene oxide using modified Hummers method: solvent influence. Procedia Eng.184, 469–477. 10.1016/j.proeng.2017.04.118

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 244

  Zamora-SequeiraR.Starbird-PérezR.Rojas-CarilloO.Vargas-VillalobosS. (2019). What are the main sensor methods for quantifying pesticides in agricultural activities? A review. Molecules.24 (14), 1–26. 10.3390/molecules24142659

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 245

  ZengW.ManojD.SunH.YiR.HuangX.SunY. (2019). One-pot synthesis of high-density Pd nanoflowers decorated 3D carbon nanotube-graphene network modified on printed electrode as portable electrochemical sensing platform for sensitive detection of nitroaromatic explosives. J. Electroanal. Chem.833, 527–535. 10.1016/j.jelechem.2018.12.028

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 246

  ZhangP.SunT.RongS.ZengD.YuH.ZhangZ.et al (2019a). A sensitive amperometric AChE-biosensor for organophosphate pesticides detection based on conjugated polymer and Ag-rGO-NH. Bioelectrochemistry.127, 163–170. 10.1016/j.bioelechem.2019.02.003

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 247

  ZhangR.ZhangC.ZhengF.LiX.SunC.-L. (2018a). Nitrogen and sulfur Co-doped graphene nanoribbons : a novel metal-free catalyst for high performance electrochemical detection of 2,4,6-trinitrotoluene (TNT). Carbon.126, 328–337. 10.1016/j.carbon.2017.10.042

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 248

  ZhangW.WangL.YangY.PaulG.TengK. S. (2019b). Recent AdVances on electrochemical sensors for the detection of organic disinfection byproducts in water. ACS Sens.4 (5), 1138–1150. 10.1021/acssensors.9b00272

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 249

  ZhangY.HuanB.HeB.ChangJ.HuoD. Q.TianC.et al (2017). Electrochemical biomimetic sensor based on oxime group-functionalized gold nanoparticles and nitrogen-doped graphene composites for highly selective and sensitive dimethoate determination. J. Solid State Electrochem.21 (7), 2117–2128. 10.1007/s10008-017-3560-0FaHouXia

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 250

  ZhangY. N.NiuQ.GuX.YangN.ZhaoG. (2019c). Recent progress on carbon nanomaterials for the electrochemical detection and removal of environmental pollutants. Nanoscale.11 (25), 11992–12014. 10.1039/c9nr02935d

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 251

  ZhangY.ChuG.GuoY.ZhaoW.YangQ.SunX. (2018b). An electrochemical biosensor based on Au nanoparticles decorated reduced graphene oxide for sensitively detecting of Hg2+. J. Electroanal. Chem.824, 201–206. 10.1016/j.jelechem.2018.07.053

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 252

  ZhangZ.FuX.LiK.LiuR.PengD.HeL.et al (2016). One-step fabrication of electrochemical biosensor based on DNA-modified three-dimensional reduced graphene oxide and chitosan nanocomposite for highly sensitive detection of Hg(II). Sensor. Actuator. B Chem.225, 453–462. 10.1016/j.snb.2015.11.091

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 253

  ZhaoG.WangH.LiuG.WangZ.ChengJ. (2017). Simultaneous determination of trace Cd(II) and Pb(II) based on Bi/Nafion/Reduced graphene oxide-gold nanoparticle nanocomposite film-modified glassy carbon electrode by one-step electrodeposition. Ionics.23 (3), 767–777. 10.1007/s11581-016-1843-6

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 254

  ZhaoT.FangM.TangZ.ZhaoX.XieF.WuF.et al (2019). Effects of fulvic acid on aggregation, sedimentation, and adsorption of Fe₃O₄ magnetic nanoparticles. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Control Ser.26 (21), 21463–21474. 10.1007/s11356-019-05441-2

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 255

  ZhengJ.ZhangM.YangL.XuJ.HuS.HayatT.et al (2018). Fabrication of one dimensional CNTs/Fe3O4@PPy/Pd magnetic composites for the accumulation and electrochemical detection of triclosan. J. Electroanal. Chem.818, 97–105. 10.1016/j.jelechem.2018.04.026

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 256

  ZhengJ.MaJ.WangZ.XuS.David WaiteT.WuZ. (2017). Contaminant removal from source waters using cathodic electrochemical membrane filtration: mechanisms and implications. Environ. Sci. Technol.51 (5), 2757–2765. 10.1021/acs.est.6b05625

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 257

  ZhouS. F.XiaoJ.FanH. L.HuangJ.LiuY. Q. (2018). Enhanced electrochemical performance for sensing Pb(II) based on graphene oxide incorporated mesoporous MnFe₂O₄ nanocomposites. J. Alloys Compd.747, 447–454. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2018.03.037Han

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 258

  ZhuangX.TianC.LuanF.WuX.ChenL. (2016). One-step electrochemical fabrication of a nickel oxide nanoparticle/polyaniline nanowire/graphene oxide hybrid on a glassy carbon electrode for use as a non-enzymatic glucose biosensor. RSC Adv.6 (95), 92541–92546. 10.1039/c6ra14970g

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 259

  ZouJ.GuoQ.TengJ.QiL.JiangX. Y.JiaoF. P.JinG. Y. (2019). Highly sensitive detection of bisphenol A in real water samples based on in-situ assembled graphene nanoplatelets and gold nanoparticles composite. Microchem. J.145, 693–702. 10.1016/j.microc.2018.11.040

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 260

  ZuoY.XuJ.ZhuX.DuanX.LuL.YuY. (2019). Graphene-derived nanomaterials as recognition elements for electrochemical determination of heavy metal ions: a review. Microchimica Acta.186 (3). 10.1007/s00604-019-3248-5

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar