Development of a New Silica Aerogel-Polypropylene Foam Composite as a Highly Flexible Thermal Insulation Material

Abstract

A new flexible thermal insulation sheet, a composite of silica aerogel with polypropylene (PP) foam, has been developed. Even though a large volume ratio of silica aerogel (97%) was included, the composite showed high flexibility. Thermal conductivity of the composite was 0.016 W/(m⋅K) at 298 K, which is as low as silica aerogel monolith. Silica aerogel flaking, which has been a problem in practical applications, is very low in this composite due to skin layers of the polymer-foam composite. A supercritical drying process for rolled sheets of the material for large-scale production is also described. Simulations of extraction of 2-propanol from a silica alcogel revealed that rolled composite sheets with small spaces between the sheet composite are able to dry in a reasonable extraction time. These findings led to effective on production of this material on a pilot industrial scale.

Introduction

Over the past several years, there has been significant interest in discovering new thermal insulating materials for a variety of applications. For example, energy conservation in the heating and air conditioning of residences and offices has been an important issue, and recently, thermal management of information and communication devices, vehicles (Haas and Walter, 2019), and electric appliances has become more important. Due to the limited amount of space for thermal insulation and the complex shapes required, flexible and thin high performance materials are needed. Vacuum insulation panels (VIP) provide the best insulation performance, but are not suitable for many applications due to a lack of flexibility and no workability. A flexible, high-performance, thermal insulating sheet which can easily be cut, drilled or pasted would be quite useful.

Silica aerogels have been identified as excellent candidates for high-performance insulators (Aegerter et al., 2011). Due to their ultra-low density and the “Knudsen effect” in mesoporous structures (Forest et al., 2015) (Jelle et al., 2019), silica aerogels demonstrate very low thermal conductivity (0.01–0.02 W/(m⋅K) at room temperature). The thermal insulating performance does not deteriorate over time, because the low thermal conductivity depends on the structure of the material, not on the presence of a vacuum or a gas with low thermal conductivity. This is of great advantage in small/thin thermal insulation materials. However, the fragility of silica aerogels has thus far proven a critical barrier for their use in flexible insulating materials.

A variety of silica aerogel composites have been investigated to overcome this barrier. A combination of silica aerogel and fibers has been shown to be effective in enhancing mechanical strength and improve handling. Inorganic (glass, silica, alumina and other oxides, carbon) and organic (natural and artificial polymers) fibers have been employed as reinforcement materials (Linhares et al., 2019). Composites with nanofibers such as cellulose (Cai et al., 2012) and polyvinylidene fluoride (Wu et al., 2013) demonstrated very high flexibility. Combination of silica aerogels and nonwoven sheets or fiber felts has been successfully marketed as industrial products from Aspen Aerogels, Cabot Corporation and other suppliers (Miros et al., 2017) and have been applied as thermal insulation for pipelines, buildings, residences and in protective clothing. When the fibric compound content is low, the thermal conductivity of these materials is close to that of silica aerogels (∼0.02 W/(m⋅K). However, silica aerogel flaking from the composite is essentially unavoidable and conspicuous, since silica aerogel structure is so fragile. These materials must therefore be avoided in applications where dust is unacceptable.

Different types of silica aerogel-polymer composites, in which silica aerogels were used as fillers in polymer matrix, have been investigated (Guzel Kaya and Deveci, 2020). Epoxy resin (Kim et al., 2015), polyurethane (Cho et al., 2019), polyethylene (Zulkipli and Romli, 2018) and polyimide (Kim et al., 2014) have also been investigated. Silica aerogel-thermosetting polymer composites produced via chemical reaction and phase separation have been produced for high temperature use. For example, a polymimide-silica aerogel composite was developed with thermal conductivity of 0.022 W/(m⋅K) (Fan et al., 2019) and Yu et al. produced phenol-formaldehyde resin composite with a thermal conductivity of 0.028 W/(m⋅K) (Yu et al., 2018). All of these composites have better mechanical properties and workability than simple silica aerogels, and are likely to show little flaking. However, the silica aerogel content in these composites is not high, probably because there are many technical difficulties in mixing low density silica aerogels with polymers. Furthermore, the thermal conductivity of these materials is ∼0.03 W/(m⋅K) at the lowest, which is comparable to conventional, cheap thermal insulators. Thus, there is little advantage in applying these silica aerogel composites as commercial insulating materials.

Combining a polymer foam with silica aerogels is an alternative approach to achieve both high silica aerogel content and to avoid flaking. Inoue et al. reported the development of a silica aerogel-polyurethane foam composite (Inoue and Yamanobe, 2013). In their work, a silica sol was introduced into highly porous polyurethane foam (0.014 g/cm³), and a silica alcogel was formed inside of the cellular structure. Then, the composite was dried in supercritical carbon dioxide (CO₂). Thermal conductivity of the composite is around 0.02 W/(m⋅K). They reported that the aerogel composite did not fracture during compression testing, but did not mention the flexibility of the material. Zhao et al. produced a silica aerogel-polyisocyanurate rigid foam composite via reactive foaming with a granular silica aerogel (Zhao et al., 2014). The composite shows a minimum thermal conductivity of 0.0233 W/(m⋅K). The compressive strength was better than that of polyisocyanurate rigid foam without the silica aerogel. Ease of handling and workability may be the same as polyisocyanurate; however, flexibility and aerogel flaking were not mentioned in their work.

We have developed a new, highly flexible, high performance thermal insulation material with a low degree of silica aerogel flaking. Our strategy is similar to that of Inoue’s work, i.e., combining a soft polymer foam having open pores with a silica aerogel prepared inside of the foam, followed by supercritical drying. We previously reported the development of combinations of silica aerogels and various polymer foams including polyurethane, melamine, and polypropylene (PP). These compounds show thermal conductivity as low as silica aerogel monolith (Yoda and Furuya, 2012). Herein, we follow up on the development of our PP foam composite and present its path to commercial production. Thermal conductivity data as well as the mechanical properties of the composite have been added. Since the silica alcogel and polypropylene composite is flexible, the supercritical drying process for the rolled composite is also presented, which is effective strategy for decreasing the production cost of the material on a commercial scale.

Experimental

Preparation of Polymer Foam-Silica Aerogel Composites

Open pore-type polymer foams were employed as the matrices. Table 1 summarizes the polymer foams used in this work. Figure 1 is a scanning electron micrograph (SEM) image of PP foam with skin layers. It was difficult to maintain uniformity in the thickness of the foams. All of the polymer foams were confirmed to resist swelling in supercritical CO₂ under the drying conditions employed.

FIGURE 1

Tetramethoxysilane (TMOS, Tokyo Kasei Co., Ltd. and Shinetsu Kagaku Co,. Ltd.), methanol (Wako, 99.9%), ammonia water (Wako), and CO₂ (Showa Tansan, 99.9%) were used without further purification. Silica sols were prepared by mixing TMOS, water, methanol, and ammonia. The typical molar ratio was 1:4:7.2:0.001, respectively, based on our previous optimization of silica aerogel with a density of 0.16 g/cm³. The sol was introduced into the polymer foams and left there until gelation occurred. These sol-gel processes were conducted at room temperature. After aging at 333 K for 2 days and solvent exchange with methanol at room temperature, hydrophobization of surface silanols using 1,1,1,3,3,3-hexamethyldisilazane (HMDS, Wako, 96%) as a silane coupling agent was conducted. The silica wet gel was soaked in 10 wt% of methnolic HMDS and refluxed at 333 K. The amount of HMDS was calculated to be an excess for the estimated number of surface silanol groups in the silica wet gel. Then, the polymer foam and silica alcogel composite was placed in an autoclave with a small amount of methanol or 2-propanol and dried in supercritical CO₂ at 20 MPa and 353 K. The details of the preparation are similar to those described in our previous paper (Yoda et al., 2004). For evaluation of mechanical properties, polymer foams were cut into prescribed size (70 × 20 and 20 × 20 mm) and placed in stacks of a few sheets of approximately the same thickness (10 and 5 mm), and the sol-gel process was conducted after they were immersed in the silica sol.

Evaluation

Thermal conductivity was evaluated via the heat flow meter method (ASTM C518). Analyses were conducted with a heat flux meter (Eko Instruments, HC-074) at 298 K, with the lower heat plate at 288 K and the upper heat plate at 308 K. For thin samples, the sample was located between two base sheets (silicone sponge), of which thickness and thermal conductivity were known. Sample thermal conductivity λs was calculated from measured thermal conductivity λ_s+2b and that of base sheet λ_b with the following equation:where t_s and t_b are the thicknesses of sample and sponge sheet, respectively, (Yoda, 2021).

The microstructure of the materials was observed via scanning electron microscopy (SEM, Hitachi S-4800) after coating with Pt-Pd by ion spattering. Compression tests for test pieces (20 × 20 × 10 mm) were performed on an Autograph AG5000A with a displacement speed of 1 mm/min. The compression tests were repeated three times for each type of samples. Compressive stress σ_c and compressive strain ε_c were calculated with the following equations:where F_c is load applied, A is area of test piece, d₀and d were thickness of test piece before and after compression, respectively.

Three-point bending tests using test pieces (70 × 20 × 10 mm) were performed on a Strograph R3 (Toyo Seiki Co., Ltd.) with a displacement speed of 1 mm/min. Since PP foam was thinner than other polymer foams, the PP foam-silica aerogel measurements were conducted using samples prepared using five PP foam sheets as described in 2.1. Bending stress σ_b and bending strain ε_b were calculated with the following equations:where F_b is load at a given point, L is support span, D is deflection of the center of the test piece, b and d were width and thickness of test piece, respectively.

Weight loss by removal of silica after continuous bending and rubbing tests (1,200 times/10 min) was evaluated using a dusting Scott flex abrasion tester (Toyo Seiki Co., Ltd.).

Simulation of Supercritical Drying Process

Extraction of 2-propanol from the silica alcogel during the supercritical drying process was simulated for optimization of temperature, pressure, and extraction time. In the experiment, the PP foam-silica alcogel composite rolled sheet was set in a high-pressure vessel and dried in supercritical CO₂. According to the experimental settings, the 2-dimensional model of the silica aerogel was assumed to be as shown in Figure 2.

FIGURE 2

In the simulation, the effect of the PP foam matrix is assumed to be negligible for simplicity, since the PP content is less than 5 vol%. The silica aerogel was considered as a packed bed with 95% of porosity and 50 nm of pore diameter, which was modeled by permeability α and inertial loss coefficient C₂:These equations have been evaluated from the Ergun equation and Blake-Kozeny equations. Here, ε is porosity and D_p is Average particle diameter (Bortolin et al., 2015).

The simulated operating conditions and physical properties of substances are listed in Table 2. These values were found in the fluid database (JMSE, 1983) or predicted by correlation. The concentration distribution of 2-propanol in the model silica gel was calculated for each extracting condition by ANSYS/Fluent v18.0, based on the Navier–Stokes equation and the diffusion equation for both CO₂ and 2-propanol.

Results and Discussion

Properties and Microstructures of Polymer Foam-Silica Aerogel Composite

Table 3 summarizes the properties of the polymer foam-silica aerogel composites. None of the composites were fragile, and some composites were flexible. The density of the products was almost the same as that of the same silica aerogels prepared without polymer foam. The thermal conductivity of the Polymer foam-silica aerogel was 0.016–0.022 W/(m⋅K) at 298 K under atmospheric pressure, which is as low as that of the parent silica aerogel. Thermal conductivity measurements of the PP foam-silica aerogel composite using a large size sample by the guarded hot plate method at the Japanese Testing Center for Construction Materials (JTCCM) provided the same thermal conductivity result.

The PP-foam silica aerogel can almost be folded and shows resiliency when bent, as shown in Figure 3. The PP-foam had good workability, and is able to be easily cut with scissors or a knife. Polyurethane foam-silica aerogels show similar workability, but poor resiliency when bent.

FIGURE 3

SEM images of the foams and aerogel composites are shown in Figure 4A–D and those of the silica aerogel prepared in the same conditions are shown in Figure 4E. There were very small spaces (∼1 μm) between the polymer foam network and the silica aerogel, probably due to the silica wet gel crosslinking through the pore structure upon formation, and then shrinking slightly during aging and drying.

FIGURE 4

Figure 5A shows stress-strain curves upon a compression testing of samples in this work. The properties of polymer foam-silica aerogels upon compression testing were close to those of the pure silica aerogel. Differences in each polymer foams may reflect the difference in interfacial space between the silica aerogels and the polymer foam matrices. Figure 5B shows stress-strain curves upon 3-point bending tests of the PP foam with skin layer-silica aerogel composite, silica aerogel and PP foam. Despite the extremely high volume content of silica aerogel in the composite, the bending strengths were much higher than that of the pure silica aerogel. That is, reinforcement by the highly porous materials was effective.

FIGURE 5

Flaking of Silica Aerogel From Polymer Foam Composites

The flaking of silica aerogels from the composites was evaluated. Such flaking can cause a variety of problems for products containing silica aerogel composites, and has been a barrier for expanding their use. Table 4 shows the results of bending and rubbing tests for silica aerogel flaking. A load was usually employed on the sample in the initial stage of the test. Loading the PP foam-silica aerogel produced very little weight loss. However, both polyurethane foam and melamine foam composite could not physically withstand and started flaking before the test using the same load as that for the PP foam. These two samples thus had to be tested under zero load. Even under zero load, the melamine foam composite was broken after a few movements.

The PP foam with skin layers and silica aerogel composite showed high flexibility and low flaking. Due to limited choices of open-pore-type polymer foams with extremely high porosity (and also limited publishable information on their structural properties form the production companies), a systematic investigation of effect of pore size, pore size distribution and interfacial interaction is difficult. However, the high flexibility and low flaking of the PP foam-silica aerogel is probably due to the high flexibility of the PP foam matrix and the relatively high dispersion of the silica aerogels in the PP foam. As shown in Table 1, the PP foam has the smallest pore size of the polymers in this work (100–200 μm) and the pores are cellular in nature (unlike the reticulate structure of the melamine foam). Silica aerogels in the pores of a PP foam would be more independent than that in polyurethane foam and in melamine foam. Small, partial breaks were observed in the PP foam-silica aerogels when bent, but the breaks were limited to a localized part of the dispersed aerogel. In addition, the skin layers prevented flaking of the partially broken silica aerogel. This result indicates that providing a higher dispersion of silica aerogel in flexible materials is a promising approach for developing highly flexible and high-performance thermal insulating materials.

Simulation on Supercritical Drying of a Rolled Sheet

Since the PP foam-silica alcogel composite has some flexibility, the supercritical drying process of a rolled sheet (Figure 6) was investigated. Extraction of alcohol is known to be diffusion-controlled inside silica alcogels (Özbakir and Erkey, 2015). For large-scale production with a space-saving rolled shape, the gap between the sheets should be small. However, such setting should require the long extraction time and understanding the effect of extraction conditions for drying time is important for commercialization. The extraction time of 2-propanol by supercritical CO₂ from a model strip in rolled silica alcogel was simulated.

FIGURE 6

Table 5 summarizes the simulation conditions and simulated drying times of silica aerogel by CO₂ supercritical drying, where the final 2-propanol mass fraction is under 3.5 × 10⁻⁶. Figure 7 represents a graphical summary of typical extraction of 2-propanol in a CO₂ system. These figures correspond to the simulation model in Figure 2 although the aspect ratio on print is different. The solid-line square shown in the figure corresponds to the silica alcogel. The distance from the center of the roll to the sheet was 87.45 mm, which was assumed the outermost side of the roll. The red color indicates 2-propanol, and the blue color indicates CO₂. At a condition for Figure 7A, extraction began 1,800 s after flow initiation, and then 2-propanol in the silica gel was replaced by CO₂ gradually. All the 2-propanol was removed from the system by 10,800 s under these conditions. High-temperature and low-pressure conditions were effective on shortening the drying time probably because of low viscosity and high diffusion in silica as shown in Figure 7B,C. A large flow rate of CO₂ was also effective in shortening the drying time as shown in Figure 7D. Due to surface 2-propanol on the silica gel is rapidly replaced with CO₂, the concentration difference in the silica gel (i.e., the driving force of drying) becomes large. However, it should be noted that even if the CO₂ flow rate is increased 10 times as shown in (a) and (d) of Table 5, the drying time is only reduced by about 2/3. Since the gel size is the dominant factor for extraction in diffusion-controlled processes, having a large flow rate of CO₂ was less effective than other factors. These results show that a supercritical drying process for a large-scale roll of thin sheet material can be completed within a practical time, so long as a small gap is kept between the layers of the rolled sheet.

FIGURE 7

Concluding Remarks

A new, flexible, thermal-insulating sheet of PP foam-silica aerogel composite was developed. The sheet shows good flexibility and low thermal conductivity (0.016 W/(m⋅K)), with mechanical performance superior to other polymer-aerogel composites. Silica aerogel flaking from the composite, a barrier for a variety of applications, was very low for the composite, probably due to the skin layers of the PP foam matrix. Since the composite is flexible, a supercritical drying process was developed for a rolled composite sheet. Simulations of extraction time were conducted on rolls having a small gap (0.05 mm) between the sheet layers of the roll. The extraction was confirmed to complete in 1–2 h, which makes a large-scale production process practical.

These results have now been applied in a pilot-scale production process using low cost silicate, and a rolled sheets 400 mm × 30 m have successfully been produced. The thermal conductivity of the large-scale product was confirmed by a guarded hot plate method, and the same thermal conductivity (0.016 W/(m⋅K)) was observed. We believe the material will prove usefulness for a variety of thermal insulation applications, and it is on track to develop a large-scale production process.

References

• 1

  AegerterM. A.LeventisN.KoebelM. M. (2011). Aerogels Handbook. New York: Springer

  • Google Scholar

• 2

  BortolinS.ToninelliP.MaggioloD.GuarnieriM.Del ColD. (2015). CFD Study on Electrolyte Distribution in Redox Flow Batteries. J. Phys. Conf. Ser.655, 012049. 10.1088/1742-6596/655/1/012049

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 3

  CaiJ.LiuS.FengJ.KimuraS.WadaM.KugaS.et al (2012). Cellulose-Silica Nanocomposite Aerogels by In Situ Formation of Silica in Cellulose Gel. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.51 (9), 2076–2079. 10.1002/anie.201105730

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 4

  ChoJ.JangH. G.KimS. Y.YangB. (2019). Flexible and Coatable Insulating Silica Aerogel/polyurethane Composites via Soft Segment Control. Composites Sci. Tech.171, 244–251. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2018.12.027

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 5

  FanW.ZhangX.ZhangY.ZhangY.LiuT. (2019). Lightweight, strong, and Super-thermal Insulating Polyimide Composite Aerogels under High Temperature. Composites Sci. Tech.173, 47–52. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2019.01.025

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 6

  ForestC.ChaumontP.CassagnauP.SwobodaB.SonntagP. (2015). Polymer Nano-Foams for Insulating Applications Prepared from CO2 Foaming. Prog. Polym. Sci.41, 122–145. 10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2014.07.001

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 7

  Guzel KayaG.DeveciH. (2020). Synergistic Effects of Silica Aerogels/xerogels on Properties of Polymer Composites: A Review. J. Ind. Eng. Chem.89, 13–27. 10.1016/j.jiec.2020.05.019

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 8

  HaasS.WalterM. (2019). Current Status and Need for thermal Insulation in Electric Cars to Reduce Heating and Cooling Capacity. in Applied Research Conference 2019 at. OTH Regensburg. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/334307499_Current_status_and_need_for_thermal_insulation_in_electric_cars_to_reduce_heating_and_cooling_capacity#fullTextFileContent

  • Google Scholar

• 9

  InoueN.YamanobeT. (2013). Preparation and Aging of Polyurethane Foams Filled with Silica Aerogels. Kobunshi Ronbunshu70 (4), 123–128. 10.1295/koron.70.123

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 10

  JelleB. P.MofidS. A.GaoT.GrandcolasM.SletnesM.SagvoldenE. (2019). Nano Insulation Materials Exploiting the Knudsen Effect. IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng.634, 012003. 10.1088/1757-899x/634/1/012003

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 11

  KimH. M.KimH. S.KimS. Y.YounJ. R. (2015). Silica Aerogel/epoxy Composites with Preserved Aerogel Pores and Low thermal Conductivity. e-Polymers15 (2), 111–117. 10.1515/epoly-2014-0165

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 12

  KimS. Y.NohY. J.LimJ.YouN.-H. (2014). Silica Aerogel/polyimide Composites with Preserved Aerogel Pores Using Multi-step Curing. Macromol. Res.22 (1), 108–111. 10.1007/s13233-014-2006-0

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 13

  LinharesT.Pessoa de AmorimM. T.DurãesL. (2019). Silica Aerogel Composites with Embedded Fibres: a Review on Their Preparation, Properties and Applications. J. Mater. Chem. A.7 (40), 22768–22802. 10.1039/C9TA04811A

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 14

  MirosA.PsiukB.Szpikowska-SrokaB. (2017). Aerogel Insulation Materials for Industrial Installation: Properties and Structure of New Factory-Made Products. J. Sol-gel. Sci. Technol.84, 496–506. 10.1007/s10971-017-4539-0

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 15

  OzbakirY.ErkeyC. (2015). Experimental and Theoretical Investigation of Supercritical Drying of Silica Alcogels. J. Supercrit. Fluids98, 153–166. 10.1016/j.supflu.2014.12.001

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 16

  The Japan Society of Mechancal Engineers (JSME) (1983). in JSME Data Book: Thermophysical Properties of Fluids (Tokyo: JMSE).

  • Google Scholar

• 17

  WuH.ChenY.ChenQ.DingY.ZhouX.GaoH. (2013). Synthesis of Flexible Aerogel Composites Reinforced with Electrospun Nanofibers and Microparticles for Thermal Insulation. J. Nanomater.2013, 1–8. 10.1155/2013/375093

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 18

  YodaS.FuruyaT. (2012). Preparation of Polymer Foam-Silica Aerogel Composites and its Evaluation as Thermal Insulator. Seikei kako24 (3), 154–158. 10.4325/seikeikakou.24.154

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 19

  YodaS.TakebayashiY.SugetaT.OtakeK. (2004). Platinum-silica Aerogels via Supercritical Drying and Impregnation. J. Non-Crystalline Sol.350, 320–325. 10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2004.06.026

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 20

  YuZ.-L.YangN.Apostolopoulou-KalkavouraV.QinB.MaZ.-Y.XingW.-Y.et al (2018). Fire-Retardant and Thermally Insulating Phenolic-Silica Aerogels. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.57 (17), 4538–4542. 10.1002/anie.201711717

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 21

  ZhaoC. Y.YanY.HuZ. H.LiL. P.FanX. Z. (2014). Preparation and Performance Characterization of Polyisocyanurate (PIR)/silica Aerogel Composite Rigid Foam Insulation Materials. Construction Building Mater.93, 309–316. 10.3963/j.issn.1671-4431.2014.08.004

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 22

  ZulkipliA. H.RomliA. Z. (2018). Thermal Characterization of Low Density Polyethylene (LDPE)/rice Husk Ash and rice Husk Ash Derived Silica Aerogel Composites. AIP Conf. Proc.1985 (1), 030011. 10.1063/1.5047169

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar