Abstract
In this article, the nickel aluminide coating prepared by the chemical vapor deposition method has adhered deliberately with nano-alumina film on the surface by the electrophoresis method. The analysis results of oxidation behavior in the air at 1,000°C reported that the nano-alumina particles adhering to the nickel aluminide coating surface appear to be effective in facilitating the θ-Al2O3 to α-Al2O3 phase transformation. The fast θ to α phase transformation helps reduce the oxidation rate of the nickel–aluminum coating and prevents the cracking and peeling in the oxide scale. The research addressed a novel method to improve the high-temperature oxidation resistance of nickel aluminide coatings.
Introduction
Nickel aluminide coatings, such as NiAl and Ni2Al3, are generally applied to the surfaces of engine turbine components to lengthen their service life (; ; ). The common preparation methods of nickel aluminide coatings include slurry, powder embedding, physical vapor deposition, and chemical vapor deposition (CVD) (; ; ; ). Compared with the other methods, the coating prepared by the CVD method has a stronger bonding force with the substrate and is denser, so its high-temperature oxidation resistance is better (; ; ).
The surface of the nickel aluminide coating will form protective thermally grown oxide (TGO)-Al2O3 at high temperatures (). Several types of Al2O3 have been found on alloys forming aluminides, such as γ-Al2O3, δ-Al2O3, θ-Al2O3, and α-Al2O3. α-Al2O3 is a good protective oxide scale because of its thermodynamic stability and slow growth rate (). During the oxidation at a temperature above 1,100°C, the nickel aluminide coating quickly forms the thermodynamically stable α-Al2O3 scale, while the metastable alumina variants scales (normally γ and θ) are formed after a oxidation for a long time () at a temperature below 1,100°C, during which they always experience the phase transformation of metastable-to-stable alumina (; ), such as θ-to-α. This phase transformation accompanies a volume shrinkage of about 10%, sometimes resulting in the generation of micro-cracks in the alumina scale (; ; ; ).
As a result, prompting the conversion of metastable-to-stable alumina is advantageous for improving the oxidation resistance of nickel aluminide coatings at high temperatures (). Moreover there is a well-known fact that a rising temperature causes a faster phase transformation of the metastable-to-stable alumina, dopants or template effects have been found to change this process (; ). For instance, Pint and his co-workers (; ) found that Y2O3, La2O3, ZrO2, and HfO2 dispersions in β-NiAl tend to retard the θ-to-α phase transformation, whereas TiO2 dispersion appears to promote this process. Lately, Peng and his co-workers (; ; ; ) reported the promoted formation of an α-Al2O3 scale on nickel aluminide with surface Cr2O3 particles. On these bases, we have a concept that spreading oxide particles (e.g., Cr2O3) with the same crystallographic structure as α-Al2O3 to aluminide can promote the growth of an α-Al2O3 scale at a high temperature (). Valet et al. (; ; ) found that the remaining fine α-Al2O3 grits, used for the polishing surface of the intermetallic sample, appeared to promote the nucleation of α-Al2O3.
In this article, nano-alumina particles were deposited on the surface of aluminide coatings by electrophoresis, and their effects on the phase transition and oxidation kinetics of the nickel aluminide coatings were investigated. It is aimed to better understand the phase transitions of the oxidative properties of nickel aluminides, and find a more effective way to improve the oxidation resistance of these nickel aluminide oxides by promoting the growth of α-Al2O3.
The Experiment
The pure nickel samples with dimensions of 10 mm × 10 mm × 2 mm were cut from an electrolyte pure nickel plate. After being abraded to a final 2,000 grit SiC paper, they were ultrasonically cleaned in acetone. By using the CVD method, the Ni2Al3 coating was developed on the pure nickel surface after aluminizing at 750°C × 200 torr for 3 h. The preparation process is as follows: high-purity Cl2 was injected into the reaction chamber containing high-purity aluminum particles (purity: 99.99%, size: 3 mm) to generate gas-phase halide AlClx. AlClx was carried into the deposition chamber by Ar, and then was reduced to activity [Al] by H2. The [Al] deposited on the pure nickel, and reacted with nickel to form a nickel aluminum coating. After aluminizing for 3 h, the samples were cooled to room temperature with the furnace. The main equations involved in the reaction are as follows:
The nano-Al2O3 film was made to adhere to the nickel aluminum coating surface by electrophoresis technology. High temperature oxidation experiments were performed using the SETSYS evolution thermo-gravimetric analyzer (for in situ recording oxidation curves) in the air at 1,000°C for 50 h. A nickel layer was coated on the oxide scale surface using electroplating in the acidic electroless nickel plating mixed solution (containing 25 g/L C3H6O3, 6.25 g/L Na2CO3, 43 g/L NiSO4·6H2O, and 25 g/L NaH2PO2·H2O) at 98°C for 5 h. Scanning electron microscope (SEM), energy dispersive spectroscopy (EDS), and X-ray diffraction (XRD) were used to investigate the surface and cross-section morphologies, structure, and the phases of various nickel aluminide coatings.
Results and Discussion
The cross-sectional morphology (Figure 1A) shows that a single layer of nickel aluminide coating (∼30 µm thickness) was deposited on pure nickel after aluminizing. The coating was dense and well adherent to the pure Ni substrate. The Ni content and Al content of the coating were 39.3 at.% and 58.9 at.%, respectively. The XRD result (Figure 1C) characterized them as deposited coating as a δ-Ni2Al3 phase. Backscattered SEM images of the polished cross-section of a nano-Al2O3 film sample are shown in Figure 1B. The as-electrophoresis Al2O3 film was continuous with a thickness of around 3 µm. However, the Al2O3 film was partially detached from the coating due to grinding and polishing during the preparation process.
FIGURE 1
Figure 2 shows the dependence on the time of mass grain and the square of mass grain of naked and Al2O3 film-covered Ni2Al3 coatings oxidated at 1,000°C for 50 h. The mass grain of Al2O3 film-covered Ni2Al3 coating is less than that of the naked one as shown in Figure 2A. In the early stages of oxidation , the surface of the two types of coatings quickly formed an aluminum oxide scale, and the oxidation weight gain rate was high. Due to the presence of alumina, the contact surface between oxygen and the coating gradually decreased, and the alumina scale gradually stabilized, so the oxidation weight gain curve tended to be flat. As shown in Figure 2B, during the 50-h oxidation, the oxidation processes of both coatings can be divided into two stages: In the initial stage (<3 h), the parabolic oxidation rate constant (KpI) of the Al2O3 film–covered Ni2Al3 coating is 3.2 × 10–13 g2/cm4s lower than that of the naked coating with parabolic oxidation rate constant KpI of ∼4.4 × 10–13 g2/cm4s. In the steady stage (>3 h), the parabolic oxidation rate constant (KpⅡ) of the Al2O3 film–covered Ni2Al3 coating is 1.2 × 10–13 g2/cm4s, also lower than that of the naked coating with parabolic oxidation rate constant KpⅡ of ∼2.4 × 10–13 g2/cm4 s.
FIGURE 2
The Al2O3 film-covered coating macroscopic surface after oxidation is shown in Figure 3A, and then the electrophoretic alumina film was removed using alcohol, as shown in Figure 3B. The surface characteristics of the naked Ni2Al3 coating changes with the increasing oxidation duration , as illustrated in Figures 4A,C,E,G. Fine alumina crystals developed on the surface at the early stage of high-temperature oxidation (30 min), and the color depth difference was caused by the distinct growth directions. The size of thin needle-like alumina crystals grew bigger after 2 h oxidation, and the oxide scale got thicker and denser. After being oxidized for 5 h, some acicular alumina became stagnant, cracks appeared on the surface, and the acicular alumina crystals were rapidly regenerated in the spalling area. After 50 h of oxidation, the oxide scale is mostly composed of acicular alumina and round alumina. According to the above morphologies and the characteristics of the alumina phase structure (), it can be judged that θ-Al2O3 is rapidly formed in the early stage of oxidation, and then the θ phase is partially converted into the α phase. The growth of α-Al2O3 will inhibit the growth of the θ phase. The lateral growth direction of α-Al2O3 resulted in surface unevenness. The conversion of θ phase to α phase will cause the microcracks or even local spalling because of volume shrinkage (the transformation from metastable alumina to α-Al2O3 is a reconstructive phase transition, which is a first-order phase transition and the process is irreversible). The spalling area will quickly generate θ-Al2O3, so both θ-Al2O3 and α-Al2O3 phases can be seen on the surface after high-temperature oxidation for 50 h. For the Al2O3 film–covered Ni2Al3 coating, an α-Al2O3 scale was formed rapidly in the early stage of oxidation. With the prolongation of oxidation time, the oxide scale gradually thickens and becomes flat (Figures 4B,D,F,H). After 5 h of oxidation, the scale appeared to slightly peel. After 50 h of oxidation, a dense and stable alumina scale has been formed. Therefore, there is no phase change in the oxide scale of the Al2O3 film–covered coating during the whole oxidation process. It can be seen in Figure 5A that the coating degradation completely conforms to the mechanism of the nickel–aluminum coating: δ-Ni2Al3→β-NiAl→γ′-Ni3Al. At the beginning of oxidation, the generated alumina is too thin and its X-ray diffraction peak intensity is weak, so the original diffraction peak pattern is partially enlarged as shown in Figures 5B′,C′, from which it is known that the α phase is formed on the surface of the electrophoretic alumina film sample from the beginning of oxidation. Based on the XRD, SEM, and TGA analysis, the early oxidation progress of aluminide in the absence and presence of the surface Al2O3 film is shown in Figure 6. At the beginning of oxidation (Stage Ⅰ), θ-Al2O3 is rapidly formed on the naked aluminide surface, while α-Al2O3 is formed on the surface of the aluminide coating with electrophoretic Al2O3 particles (). Then both increase to form an alumina scale (Stage Ⅱ); the alumina is much denser as shown in Figures 4C,D. In stage Ⅲ, generated α-Al2O3 grows inward and outward at the same time, during which the most electrophoresed Al2O3 film on the surface is pushed outward, and a small part is wrapped by the outwardly growing α-Al2O3 (). At this time, the exposed θ-Al2O3 of the naked sample transforms into α-Al2O3 (Figure 4E). With α-Al2O3 gradually increasing, an α-Al2O3 scale was formed at the interface between NiAl coating and θ-Al2O3 (Stage Ⅳ). During this phase transition, volume shrinkage will occur, resulting in cracks or even peeling of the scale (), which are visible on the surface topography (Figure 4).
FIGURE 3
FIGURE 4
FIGURE 5
FIGURE 6
The nickel aluminide thermally grows θ-Al2O3 before α-Al2O3 because the former has lower surface energies and thus a much lower nucleation barrier ΔG*. This is the direct origin of why the metastable alumina phases rather than the most stable ones usually form during the initial oxidation of β-NiAl (). Therefore, during the subsequent oxidation, the undesirable metastable-to-stable phase transformation of alumina becomes unavoidable. The direct α-Al2O3 formation without metastable-to-stable alumina phase transformation on typical oxide particles (e.g., α-Al2O3, Cr2O3, and Fe2O3) means that the template effect of the oxides isostructural to α-Al2O3 intrinsically reduces ΔG* of α-Al2O3 down to such a level in favor of its thermal nucleation (; ; ; ). The template effect has been widely studied by revealing some oxides (e.g., Cr2O3 and Fe2O3), which are isostructural to α-Al2O3, and may serve as the nucleation sites facilitating the growth of the α-Al2O3 (; ; ; ). This interpretation coincides well with a promoted θ-to-α alumina phase transformation on β-NiAl when it has been embedded with the fine particles of α-Al2O3 (). The electrophoretic α-Al2O3 particles have the same HCP crystal structure as the α-Al2O3 grown from the coating and can act as an epitaxial growth platform for α-Al2O3 during oxidation, reducing the nucleation energy of the latter. Therefore, when the surface is completely covered with alumina nanoparticles, the θ-to-α phase transition can be skipped when the coating is oxidized at 1,000°C, and α-Al2O3 is directly generated.
The Al2O3 particle pretreatment significantly decreases the oxidation rate, leading to a slower degradation rate of the nickel aluminide. As seen in the cross-sectional characteristics in Figure 7, after 50 h of oxidation, the phase structures of both types of coatings are NiAl + Ni3Al phases, indicating that the unstable δ-Ni2Al3 phase degenerates into the NiAl phase at a high temperature of 1,000 °C, and then unceasingly degenerates into the Ni3Al phase with oxidation time prolongation. In Figure 7, the thickness of the naked coating and the Al2O3 film–covered coating after oxidation is thicker than that before oxidation, indicating that both coatings have a certain degree of Al elements internal-diffusion during the high-temperature oxidation process. It can be seen from Figures 7A,B that the alumina scale thickness of the naked coating is about 7.9 µm, which is twice that of the Al2O3-scale–covered coating (∼3.5 µm). This is consistent with the analysis result of the oxidation growth curve. During the oxidation process, aluminum ions moving from the inside of the coating to the coating surface meet with oxygen atoms to form an aluminum oxide scale, so there will be a γ-Ni3Al phase formed due to the Al rapid consumption between the aluminum oxide film and the nickel–aluminum coating. Since the naked coating needs to consume more Al elements to form the aluminum oxide scale, the thickness of the γ-Ni3Al phase coating is significantly thicker than that of the Al2O3 film–covered coating, which is near the aluminum oxide scale. The reason for the difference in the thickness of the two coatings is that electrophoretic alumina can promote the formation of α-Al2O3 on the coating surface, which can effectively prevent the oxygen element from entering the coating, reducing the consumption of the Ni2Al3 coating. Therefore, promoting the formation of stable-phase α-Al2O3 is an effective way to improve the high-temperature oxidation resistance and prolong the life of the coating. The large difference in coating consumption in the same sample is due to the consumption of aluminum elements again to form an aluminum oxide scale after the local scale peels off. With the prolongation of oxidation time, the cracks increase and cause local peeling of the aluminum oxide scale. The spalled area will quickly deplete the nickel–aluminum coating to form a new aluminum oxide scale.
FIGURE 7
Conclusion
The Ni2Al3 coating with a thickness of 35 μm was prepared on the pure Ni matrix using a chemical vapor deposition method at 750°C × 200 T for 3 h, and then the Al2O3 film was made to adhere to the Ni2Al3 coating surface by electrophoresis technology. Because of the lower power required to form the critical nuclei, the θ-Al2O3 formed earlier on the naked Ni2Al3 coating and then undergo a θ-to-α Al2O3 transition process during the oxidation process at 1,000 °C. The electrophoretic Al2O3 film adhering to Ni2Al3 coating can skip this phase transition because the Al2O3 film on the coating surface can provide a crystal template to promote the nucleation of α-Al2O3 at the beginning of oxidation. The rapid nucleation of α-Al2O3 significantly reduces the oxidation rate of NiAl coating and prevents microcracks and voids caused by phase transformation.
Statements
Data availability statement
The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/supplementary material; further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.
Author contributions
YF carried out experiments; XS directed the experiment and analyzed experimental results; SD analyzed experimental results.
Funding
The work is supported by the Graduate Innovation Special Fund Project of Nanchang Hangkong University (project Grant No. YC2021-S660).
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors, and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
References
1
AnT. F.GuanH. R.SunX. F.HuZ. Q. (2000). Effect of the θ–α-Al2O3 Transformation in Scales on the Oxidation Behavior of a Nickel-Base Superalloy with an Aluminide Diffusion Coating. Oxid. Mater.54, 301–316.
2
BouchaudB.RannouB.PedrazaF. (2013). Slurry Aluminizing Mechanisms of Ni-Based Superalloys Incorporating an Electrosynthesized Ceria Diffusion Barrier. Mater. Chem. Phys.143, 416–424. 10.1016/j.matchemphys.2013.09.022
3
GoralM.OchalK.KubaszekT.DrajewiczM. (2020). The Influence of Deposition Technique of Aluminide Coatings on Oxidation Resistance of Different Nickel Superalloys. Mater. Today Proc.33, 1746–1751. 10.1016/j.matpr.2020.04.863
4
GowardG. W.BooneD. H. (1971). Mechanisms of Formation of Diffusion Aluminide Coatings on Nickel-Base Superalloys. Oxid. Mater.3, 475–495. 10.1007/bf00604047
5
GowardG. W. (1970). Current Research on the Surface Protection of Superalloys for Gas Turbine Engines. JOM22, 31–39. 10.1007/bf03355665
6
HuangY.PengX.ChenQ. (2019). TiO2 Nanoparticles-Assisted α-Al2O3 Direct Thermal Growth on Nickel Aluminide Intermetallics: Template Effect of the Oxide with the Hexagonal Oxygen Sublattice. Corros. Sci.153, 109–117. 10.1016/j.corsci.2019.03.025
7
HuangY.PengX. (2016). The Promoted Formation of an α-Al 2 O 3 Scale on a Nickel Aluminide with Surface Cr 2 O 3 Particles. Corros. Sci.112, 226–232. 10.1016/j.corsci.2016.07.029
8
KhanaA.HuangY.DongZ.PengX. (2019). Effect of Cr2O3 Nanoparticle Dispersions on Oxidation Kinetics and Phase Transformation of Thermally Grown Alumina on a Nickel Aluminide Coating – ScienceDirect. Corros. Sci.150, 91–99.
9
LengW.PillaiR.NaumenkoD.GaliullinT.QuadakkersW. J. (2020). Effect of Substrate Alloy Composition on the Oxidation Behaviour and Degradation of Aluminide Coatings on Two Ni Base Superalloys. Corros. Sci.167, 81–99. 10.1016/j.corsci.2020.108494
10
LiuG.LiM.ZhuM.ZhouY. (2007). Transient of Alumina Oxide Scale on β-NiAl Coated on M38G Alloy at 950°C. Intermetallics15, 1285–1290. 10.1016/j.intermet.2007.03.010
11
MollardM.RannouB.BouchaudB.BalmainJ.BonnetG.PedrazaF. (2013). Comparative Degradation of Nickel Aluminized by Slurry and by Pack Cementation under Isothermal Conditions. Corros. Sci.66, 118–124. 10.1016/j.corsci.2012.09.009
12
MonteroX.GaletzM. C.SchützeM. (2013). Low-activity Aluminide Coatings for Superalloys Using a Slurry Process Free of Halide Activators and Chromates. Surf. Coatings Technol.222, 9–14. 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2013.01.033
13
NichollsJ. R. (2003). Advances in Coating Design for High-Performance Gas Turbines. MRS Bull.28 (9), 659–670. 10.1557/mrs2003.194
14
PengX.ClarkeD. R.WangF. (2003). Transient-alumina Transformations during the Oxidation of Magnetron-Sputtered CoCrAl Nanocrystalline Coatings. Oxid. Metals60, 225–240. 10.1023/a:1026015101783
15
PintB. A.TreskaM.HobbsL. W. (1997). The Effect of Various Oxide Dispersions on the Phase Composition and Morphology of Al2O3 Scales Grown on β-NiAl. Oxid. Met.47, 1–20. 10.1007/bf01682369
16
SwadbaL.NawratG.MendalaB.GoralM. (2011). The Influence of Deposition Process on Structure of Platinum-Modified Aluminide Coatings O Ni-Base Superalloy. Key Eng. Mat.465, 247–250.
17
TolpygoV. K.ClarkeD. R. (2000). Microstructural Study of the Theta-Alpha Transformation in Alumina Scales Formed on Nickel-Aluminides. Mater. A. T. High. Temp.17, 59–70. 10.1179/mht.2000.011
18
VealB. W.PaulikasA. P.BirtcherR. C. (2006). Mechanisms and Control of Phase Transition in Thermally Grown Aluminas. Appl. Phys. Lett.89, 505. 10.1063/1.2364124
19
WangX.PengX.TanX.WangF. (2016). The Reactive Element Effect of Ceria Particle Dispersion on Alumina Growth: A Model Based on Microstructural Observations. Sci. Rep.6, 29593, 1–10. 10.1038/srep29593
20
WangY. D.ZhouY. B. (2012). Cyclic-Oxidation of RexOy-Modified Aluminide Coating. Amr557-559, 1721–1726. 10.4028/www.scientific.net/amr.557-559.1721
21
WarnesB. M.PunolaD. C. (1997). Clean Diffusion Coatings by Chemical Vapor Deposition. Surf. Coatings Technol.94-95, 1–6. 10.1016/s0257-8972(97)00467-2
22
XuC.PengX.WangF. (2010). Cyclic Oxidation of an Ultrafine-Grained and CeO2-Dispersed δ-Ni2Al3 Coating. Corros. Sci.52, 740–747. 10.1016/j.corsci.2009.10.034
23
YavorskaM.SieniawskiJ.FilipR.GancarczykT. (2011). Microstructure Investigation of Aluminide Coatings after Platinum Modification Deposited by CVD Method on Inconel 713 LC Ni-Base Superalloy. Amr409, 883–888. 10.4028/www.scientific.net/amr.409.883
24
YinQ. F.ZhenR. (2015). Effect of Y2O3 on Microstructure and Oxidation Resistance Behavior of Aluminide Coating on Ni-Based Superalloy. Adv. Mat. Res.13, 603–607.
Summary
Keywords
Nickel aluminide coating, alumina modified, high temperature, oxidation, phase transition
Citation
Fang Y, Shu X and Dong S (2022) High Temperature Oxidation Behavior of Nano-Alumina–Modified NiAl Coating. Front. Mater. 9:934215. doi: 10.3389/fmats.2022.934215
Received
02 May 2022
Accepted
16 May 2022
Published
27 June 2022
Volume
9 - 2022
Edited by
Yi Xu, Nanchang University, China
Reviewed by
Zenghua Gao, Aerospace Special Materials and Processing Technology Institute Beijing, China
Bo Li, East China University of Science and Technology, China
Updates
Copyright
© 2022 Fang, Shu and Dong.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Xiaoyong Shu, xiaoyong202@126.com
This article was submitted to Environmental Degradation of Materials, a section of the journal Frontiers in Materials
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.