ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Mater.
Sec. Structural Materials
Volume 12 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fmats.2025.1641275
This article is part of the Research TopicMicrobial Induced Calcite Precipitation for Developing Sustainable Construction MaterialsView all 4 articles
IMPACT OF SAND SURFACE COATING ON BIOCEMENTATION MECHANISMS
Provisionally accepted- 1Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa, United States
- 2Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, United States
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
In biocementation, the overall degree of cementation achieved is constrained by the successful completion of four individual, potentially rate-limiting steps: (i) adsorption of the biocatalyst urease onto the soil grains, (ii) retained enzymatic activity of adsorbed urease, (iii) calcium carbonate (CaCO3) precipitation, and (iv) soil strengthening. Failure in any single step can result in no or limited cementation thus limited strength gain. This study conducted a thorough analysis of each step and how they translated to the degree of cementation achieved in mixtures of uncoated, iron-coated, and hydrophobically treated sand. Our results showed that higher levels of protein adsorption and urease activity were found in columns containing 10% hydrophobic sand, but that did not translate to higher amounts of calcium precipitate produced. Approximately 23% more protein mass adsorbed onto the iron-coated columns compared to 100% sand columns, but the overall urease activity was similar among these columns. However, the strength gain was 100% higher in the iron-coated columns when compared to 100% sand columns, suggesting that CaCO3 bridging was highly effective in the iron-coated columns. Overall, the results from this study highlight the importance of considering each underlying mechanisms behind biocementation, especially when the goal is to optimize the technique for field applications.
Keywords: bacterial enzyme-induced calcite precipitation, Urease, Soil strengthening, protein adsorption, Hydrophobic soil, Iron
Received: 04 Jun 2025; Accepted: 13 Oct 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Vilar, Ikuma and Cetin. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Kaoru Ikuma, kikuma@iastate.edu
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.