ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Mater.
Sec. Biomaterials and Bio-Inspired Materials
The Effects of Different Surface Treatments on the Surface Properties and Microstructure of Restorative Materials: An in Vitro Study
Provisionally accepted
- 1Hunan University of Chinese Medicine, Gradute School, Changsha, China
- 2Changsha Central Hospital, Changsha, China
- 3Changsha Stomatological Hospital, Changsha, China
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Introduction: This study aims to systematically evaluate the differential effects of ultrasonic treatment, erythritol sandblasting, sodium bicarbonate sandblasting, and polishing on the surface roughness (Ra), volume loss, and surface microtopography of four dental restorative materials: composite resin, glass ionomer, ceramic, and titanium. Methods: Specimens of each material were randomly assigned to the following treatment groups (n=16, for each group): Group A (ultrasonic treatment), Group B (erythritol sandblasting), Group C (sodium bicarbonate sandblasting), Group D (polishing), and Group E (non-surface treated control group). Ra was measured before and after treatment using a surface profilometer. Volume loss was quantified with an electronic micrometer, and surface morphology was examined by scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Data were analyzed using paired t-tests, one-way ANOVA, and two-way ANOVA to examine the main effects and interactions. Results: Two-way ANOVA revealed a significant interaction between material type and treatment method for both volume loss and Ra (p<0.001), indicating that the treatment efficacy was material-dependent. Both sandblasting methods resulted in significantly greater surface improvement, when compared to ultrasonic treatment and polishing (p<0.05). Sodium bicarbonate sandblasting yielded the greatest improvement for titanium (ΔRa = -0.295) and glass ionomer (ΔRa = -0.211). Erythritol sandblasting provided effective surface leveling with more uniform and milder morphological changes. SEM confirmed the uniform abrasion after sandblasting versus scratches or residual debris after polishing or ultrasonic treatment, respectively. Glass ionomer had the highest volume loss (139-153 μm), while ceramic had the lowest volume loss (14-17 μm). Conclusion: Sandblasting was overall superior to ultrasonic and polishing treatments, as evidenced by the improved Ra, controlled volume loss, and supporting micro-topographical observations. Sodium bicarbonate sandblasting is suitable for reducing aggressive roughness, while erythritol sandblasting is preferable for minimal and uniform surface treatment. Among the tested materials, ceramic had the best wear resistance and surface stability across all surface treatments.
Keywords: Erythritol, sandblasting, Sodium Bicarbonate, surface roughness, Volume loss
Received: 20 Nov 2025; Accepted: 11 Feb 2026.
Copyright: © 2026 Liu, Hu, Wang, chen, Li, He, Xie, Zhu and Wang. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence:
Lilei Zhu
Yan Wang
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.