ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Phys., 28 February 2020

Sec. Statistical and Computational Physics

Volume 8 - 2020 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fphy.2020.00033

Generalized Mittag-Leffler Type Function: Fractional Integrations and Application to Fractional Kinetic Equations

  • Department of Mathematics, College of Arts and Sciences, Prince Sattam Bin Abdulaziz University, Wadi Aldawaser, Saudi Arabia

Article metrics

View details

13

Citations

3,3k

Views

944

Downloads

Abstract

The generalized fractional integrations of the generalized Mittag-Leffler type function (GMLTF) are established in this paper. The results derived in this paper generalize many results available in the literature and are capable of generating several applications in the theory of special functions. The solutions of a generalized fractional kinetic equation using the Sumudu transform is also derived and studied as an application of the GMLTF.

1. Introduction

The Pochhammer symbol (ϖ)n is defined by (for ϖ ∈ ℂ)[see ([1], p. 2 and p. 5)]:

The familiar generalized hypergeometric function pFq is defined as follows (see [2]):

where (ϖj)n and (χj)n given in (1) and χi can not be a negative integer or zero. Here p or q or both are permitted to be zero. For all finite x, the series (2) is absolutely convergent if pq and for |x| < 1 if p = q + 1. When p > q + 1, then the series diverge for x ≠ 0 and the series does not terminate.

In particular, if p = 2 and q = 1, (2) reduces to the Gaussian hypergeometric function

The function rΨs(z) is the generalized Wright hypergeometric series which is given by

where 𝔞i, 𝔟j ∈ ℂ, and real ϖi, χj ∈ ℝ (i = 1, 2, …, r; j = 1, 2, …, s). The asymptotic behavior of (4) for large values of argument of z ∈ ℂ were mentioned in [3, 4] (also, see [5, 6]).

To proceed our study, we need the definitions of the Mittag-Leffler functions (MLF) denoted by Eϖ(z) (see [7]) and Eϖ, χ(x) [8], respectively:

Many more generalizations and extensions of MLF widely studied recently [9, 10]. Also, the MLF performs an important role in physics and engineering problems. The derivations of physical problems of exponential nature could be governed by the physical laws through the MLF (power-law) [1113].

Very recently, Nisar [14] defined a generalized Mittag-Leffler type function which is defined as follows

For ρ, σ, ς ∈ ℂ, ℜ(κ) > 0, δ ≠ 0, −1, −2, ⋯ , (κ)s and (ω)s denotes the Pochammer symbol.

By assuming particular values for various parameters in (7), we get many of the popular functions in the literature. For example, gives the K− function [15] and turns to [16]. Also, reduces to [17] and gives the Mittag-Leffler function Eρ, σ(z) [8]. Similar way, turns to the Mittag-Leffler functions Eρ(z) [7]. For more details one can be referred to Nisar [14].

2. Generalized Fractional Integration of GMLTF

Fractional calculus is one of the prominent branch of applied mathematics that deals with non-integer order derivatives and integrals (including complex orders), and their applications in almost all disciplines of science and engineering [1822]. In this line, the use of special functions in connection with fractional calculus also studied widely [2327]. For the basics of fractional calculus and its related literature, interesting readers can be referred to as Kiryakova [28], Miller and Ross [29], and Srivastava et al. [30]. In this paper, we studied the generalized fractional calculus of more generalized function given in (7). The generalized fractional integral operators (FIOs) involving the Appell functions F3 are given for ϖ, ϖ′, τ, τ′, ϵ ∈ ℂ with ℜ(ϵ) > 0 and x ∈ ℝ+as follows:

and

The integral operators of the types (8) and (9) have been introduced by Marichev [31] and later extended and studied by Saigo and Maeda [32]. Recently, many researchers (see [3335]) have studied the image formulas for MSM FIOs involving various special functions.

The corresponding fractional differential operators (FDOs) have their respective forms:

and

Here, we recall the following results (see [32, 36]).

LEMMA 2.1. Let ϖ, ϖ′, τ, τ′, ϵ, σ ∈ ℂ be such that ℜ(ϵ) > 0 and

Then there exists the relation

LEMMA 2.2. Let ϖ, ϖ′, τ, τ′, ϵ, σ ∈ ℂ such that ℜ(ϵ) > 0 and

Then

The main aim of this paper is to apply the generalized operators of fractional calculus for the GMLTF in order to get certain new image formulas.

2.1. Sumudu Transform

The Sumudu transform is widely used to solve various type of problems in science and engineering and it is introduced by Watugala (see [37, 38]). The details of Sumudu transforms, properties, and its applications the interesting readers can be refer to Asiru [39], Belgacem et al. [40], and Bulut et al. [41].

The Sumudu transform over the set functions

is defined by

The main aim of this study is to establish the generalized fractional calculus operators and the generalized FKEs involving GMLTF.

Theorem 2.1. Let η, η′, χ, χ′, ϵ, τ, ϖ, λ, γ ∈ ℂ, ℜ(κ) > 0, δ ≠ 0, −1, −2, ⋯ , such that ℜ(τ) > max{0, ℜ(η + η′ − χ − ϵ), ℜ(η′ − χ′)}. Then

Proof. Applying the definition (7) on the left hand side (l.h.s) of Theorem 2.1,

Changing the order of integration and summation gives

Applying Lemma 2.1, we get

Using Γ(x + κ) = (x)kΓ(x), we have

In view of (4), we reached the required result.     □

Theorem 2.2. Let η, η′, χ, χ′, ϵ, τ, ϖ, λ, γ ∈ ℂ, ℜ(κ) > 0, δ ≠ 0, − 1, −2, ⋯ , such that ℜ(τ) > max{ℜ(χ), ℜ(−η − η′ + ϵ), ℜ(−η − χ′ + ϵ)}. Then

Proof. Applying the definition (7) on the left hand side (l.h.s) of Theorem 2.2,

Changing the order of integration and summation gives

Applying Lemma 2.2, we get

Using Γ(x + r) = (x)rΓ(x), we have

In view of (4), we reached the required result.     □

The following corollaries can derive immediately from Theorems 2.1 and 1.2 with the help of Pochhammer symbol

Corollary 2.1. Let δ = λ = 1 in Theorem 2.1, we get

Corollary 2.2. If δ = λ = 1 in Theorem 2.1, then

In the next section, we derived the generalized FKEs and we consider the Sumudu transform methodology to achieve the results.

3. Generalized Fractional Kinetic Equations Involving GMLTF

The generalized fractional kinetic equations (FKEs) involving the GMLTF with the Sumudu transform is derived in this section. The FKEs are studied widely in many papers [4245].

Let 𝔎 = (𝔎t) be the arbitrary reaction defined by a time-dependent quantity. The destruction 𝔡 and production 𝔭 depend on the quantity 𝔎 itself: 𝔡 = 𝔡(𝔎) or 𝔭 = 𝔭(𝔎) [see [42]]. The fractional differential equation can be expressed by

where 𝔎t described by (see, [42]). A special case of (15) is

with 𝔎i(t = 0) = 𝔎0, 𝔠i > 0 and the solution of (16) is

Performing the integration of (16) leads to

where is the particular case of Riemann–Liouville (R-L) integral operator and 𝔠 is a constant. The fractional form of (18) is (see [42])

where is given by

Theorem 3.1. For ϖ, λ, γ ∈ ℂ, δ ≠ 0, −1, −2, ⋯ , d > 0, ϵ > 0 then the solution of

is given by

Proof. The Sumudu transform (ST) of the R-L fractional operator is

where G(u) is defined in (14). Now, applying the ST on the both sides of (21) and using (7) and (23), we have

which gives

which implies that

After some simple calculation, we get

The inverse ST of (27) and using the formula , ℜ(ϵ) > 0 gives

In view of the Mittag-Leffler function definition, we arrived the needful result.

Theorem 3.2. For ϖ, λ, γ ∈ ℂ, δ ≠ 0, −1, −2, ⋯ , d > 0, ϵ > 0 then the equation

have the following solution

Proof. Applying the Sumudu transform on the both sides of (29)

and using (7) and (23), we get

which gives

which can be simplified as

Taking the Sumudu inverse of (34) and using , we get

In view of the definition of the Mittag-Leffler function, we get the required result.     □

Theorem 3.3. For ϖ, λ, γ ∈ ℂ, δ ≠ 0, −1, −2, ⋯ , d > 0, ϵ > 0 and ad then the equation

have the following solution

Proof. Applying the Sumudu transform on the both sides of (36)

and using (7) and (23), we get

which gives

which can be simplified as

Taking the Sumudu inverse of (41) and using , we get

In view of the definition of the Mittag-Leffler function, we get the required result.     □

If we take δ = 1 in Theorem 1.3, we get the generalized FKE involving K − function as follows:

Corollary 3.1. For ϖ, λ, γ ∈ ℂ, δ ≠ 0, −1, −2, ⋯ , d > 0, ϵ > 0 then

is given by

If we take δ = 1, p = q = 0 in Theorem 3.1, we have the generalized FKE involving the Prabhakar function:

Corollary 3.2. For ϖ, λ, γ ∈ ℂ, δ ≠ 0, −1, −2, ⋯ , d > 0, ϵ > 0 then

is given by

If we choose δ = 1, p = q = 0 and γ = 1 in Theorem 3.1, then the generalized FKE involving the Wiman function:

Corollary 3.3. For ϖ, λ ∈ ℂ, δ ≠ 0, −1, −2, ⋯ , d > 0, ϵ > 0 then

is given by

If we choose δ = 1, p = q = 0 and γ = 1 in Theorem 3.1, then we get the generalized FKE involving the Mittag-Leffler function:

Corollary 3.4. For ϖ ∈ ℂ, δ ≠ 0, −1, −2, ⋯ , d > 0, ϵ > 0 then

is given by

Remark 3.1. By choosing the suitable parameters in Theorems 3.2 and 3.3, one can derive the generalized FKEs of GMLTF as similar as above corollaries.

4. Conclusion

The generalized fractional integrations of the generalized Mittag-Leffler type function is studied in this paper. The obtained results are expressed in terms of the generalized Wright hypergeometric function and generalized hypergeometric functions. To show the potential application of GMLTF, the solutions of fractional kinetic equations are derived with the help of Sumudu transform. The results obtained in this study have significant importance as the solution of the equations are general and can derive many new and known solutions of FKEs involving various type of special functions.

Statements

Data availability statement

All datasets generated for this study are included in the article.

Author contributions

The author confirms being the sole contributor of this work and has approved it for publication.

Conflict of interest

The author declares that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

References

  • 1.

    SrivastavaHMChoiJ. Zeta and q-Zeta Functions and Associated Series and Integrals. Amsterdam; London; New York, NY: Elsevier Science Publishers (2012).

  • 2.

    RainvilleED. Special Functions. New York, NY: Macmillan (1960).

  • 3.

    FoxC. The asymptotic expansion of generalized hypergeometric functions. Proc Lond Math Soc. (1928) 27:389400.

  • 4.

    KilbasAASaigoMTrujilloJJ. On the generalized Wright function. Fract Calc Appl Anal. (2002) 5:43760.

  • 5.

    WrightEM. The asymptotic expansion of integral functions defined by Taylor series. Philos Trans Roy Soc Lond A. (1940) 238:42351.

  • 6.

    WrightEM. The asymptotic expansion of the generalized hypergeometric function. Proc Lond Math Soc. (1940) 46:389408.

  • 7.

    Mittag-LefflerGM. Sur la representation analytiqie d'une fonction monogene cinquieme note. Acta Math. (1905) 29:10181.

  • 8.

    WimanA. Uber den fundamental satz in der theorie der funktionen Eα(z). Acta Math. (1905) 29:191201.

  • 9.

    RahmanGBaleanuDAl QurashiMPurohitSDMubeenSMuhammadA. The extended Mittag-Leffler function via fractional calculus. J Nonlinear Sci Appl. (2017) 10:424453. 10.22436/jnsa.1.19

  • 10.

    NisarKSRahmanGBaleanuDMubeenSArshadM. The (k,s)-fractional calculus of k-Mittag-Leffler function. Adv Differ Equat. (2017) 2017:118. 10.1186/s13662-017-1176-4

  • 11.

    KumarSKumarAMomaniSAldhaifallahMNisarKS. Numerical solutions of nonlinear fractional model arising in the appearance of the stripe patterns in two-dimensional systems. Adv Differ Equat. (2019) 2019:413. 10.1186/s13662-019-2334-7

  • 12.

    SinghJKumarDSwroopRKumarS. An efficient computational approach for time-fractional Rosenau–Hyman equation. Neural Comput Appl. (2018) 30:306370. 10.1007/s00521-017-2909-8

  • 13.

    BhatterSMathurAKumarDNisarKSSinghJ. Fractional modified Kawahara equation with Mittag–Leffler law. Chaos Solit Fract. (2019) 2019:109508. 10.1016/j.chaos.2019.109508

  • 14.

    NisarKS. Fractional integrations of a generalized Mittag-Leffler type function and its application. Mathematics. (2019) 7:1230. 10.3390/math7121230

  • 15.

    SharmaK. Application of fractional calculus operators to related Areas. Gen Math Notes. (2011) 7:3340. 10.1142/9789814340250_0005

  • 16.

    PrabhakarTR. A singular integral equation with a generalized Mittag-Leffler function in the Kernel. Yokohama Math J. (1971) 19:715.

  • 17.

    SrivastavaHMTomovskiZ. Fractional calculus with an integral operator containing a generalized Mittag–Leffler function in the kernel. Appl Math Comput. (2009) 211:198210. 10.1016/j.amc.1.055

  • 18.

    OdibatZKumarS. A robust computational algorithm of homotopy asymptotic method for solving systems of fractional differential equations. J Comput Nonlinear Dyn. (2019) 14:081004. 10.1115/1.4043617

  • 19.

    SinghJKumarDBaleanuD. New aspects of fractional Biswas-Milovic model with Mittag-Leffler law. Math Model Nat Phenom. (2019) 14:303. 10.1051/mmnp/2018068

  • 20.

    YangXJ. New general fractional-order rheological models with kernels of Mittag-Leffler functions. Rom Rep Phys. (2017) 69:118.

  • 21.

    YangXJGaoFTenreiro MachadoJABaleanuD. A new fractional derivative involving the normalized sinc function without singular kernel. Eur Phys J Spec Top. (2017) 226:356775. 10.1140/epjst/e2018-00020-2

  • 22.

    GaoWGhanbariBBaskonusHM. New numerical simulations for some real world problems with Atangana–Baleanu fractional derivative. Chaos Solit Fract. (2019) 128:3443. 10.1016/j.chaos.1.037

  • 23.

    AraciSRahmanGGhaffarAAzeemaNisarKS. Fractional calculus of extended Mittag-Leffler function and its applications to statistical distribution. Mathematics. (2019) 7:248. 10.3390/math7030248

  • 24.

    AndrićMFaridGPećarićJ. A further extension of Mittag-Leffler function. Fract Calc Appl Anal. (2018) 21:137795. 10.1515/fca-2018-0072

  • 25.

    RahmanGNisarKSChoiJMubeenSArshadM. Formulas for Saigo fractional integral operators with 2F1 generalized k -Struve functions. Far East J Math Sci. (2017) 102:5566. 10.17654/MS102010055

  • 26.

    KumarDSinghJBaleanuD. A new analysis of the Fornberg-Whitham equation pertaining to a fractional derivative with Mittag-Leffler-type kernel. Eur Phys J Plus. (2018) 133:70. 10.1140/epjp/i2018-11934-y

  • 27.

    ChoiJMubeenSNisarKSChoiJ. Certain extended special functions and fractional integral and derivative operators via an extended beta function. Nonlinear Funct Anal Appl. (2019) 24:113. Available online at: http://nfaa.kyungnam.ac.kr/journal-nfaa

  • 28.

    KiryakovaV. All the special functions are fractional differintegrals of elementary functions. J Phys A. (1977) 30:5085103.

  • 29.

    MillerKSRossB. An Introduction to the Fractional Calculus and Fractional Differential Equations. New York, NY: Wiley (1993).

  • 30.

    SrivastavaHMLinSDWangPY. Some fractional-calculus results for the H-function associated with a class of Feynman integrals. Russ J Math Phys. (2006) 13:94100. 10.1134/S1061920806010092

  • 31.

    MarichevOI. Volterra equation of Mellin convolution type with a Horn function in the kernel. Izvest Akad Nauk BSSR Ser Fiziko Mat Nauk. (1974) 1:1289.

  • 32.

    SaigoMMaedaN. Editors. More generalization of fractional calculus. Transform methods and special functions. In: Proceedings of the 2nd International Workshop, Varna (1996).

  • 33.

    BaleanuDKumarDPurohitSD. Generalized fractional integrals of product of two H-functions and a general class of polynomials. Int J Comput Math. (2016) 93:13209. 10.1080/1.1045886

  • 34.

    MondalSRNisarKS. Marichev-Saigo-Maeda fractional integration operators involving generalized Bessel functions. Math Probl Eng. (2014) 2014:11. 10.1155/2014/274093

  • 35.

    PurohitSDSutharDLKallaSL. Marichev-Saigo-Maeda fractional integration operators of the Bessel function. Le Mat. (2012) 67:2132. 10.4418/1.1.2

  • 36.

    KatariaKKVellaisamyP. The generalized k-Wright function and Marichev-Saigo-Maeda fractional operators. J Anal. (2015) 23:7587.

  • 37.

    WatugalaGK. Sumudu transform:a new integral transform to solve differential equations and control engineering problems. Int J Math Edu Sci Tech. (1993) 24:3543.

  • 38.

    WatugalaGK. The Sumudu transform for functions of two variables. Math Eng Ind. (2002) 8:293302.

  • 39.

    AsiruMA. Sumudu transform and the solution of integral equation of convolution type. Int J Math Educ Sci Technol. (2001) 32:90610. 10.1080/002073901317147870

  • 40.

    BelgacemFBMKaraballiAAKallaSL. Analytical investigations of the Sumudu transform and applications to integral production equations. J Math Probl Eng. (2003) 3:10318. 10.1155/S1024123X03207018

  • 41.

    BulutHBaskonusHMBelgacemFB. The analytical solution of some fractional ordinary differential equations by the Sumudu transform method. Abstr Appl Anal. (2013) 2013:6. 10.1155/2013/203875

  • 42.

    HauboldHJMathaiAM. The fractional kinetic equation and thermonuclear functions. Astrophys Space Sci. (2000) 327:5363. 10.1023/A:1002695807970

  • 43.

    SaxenaRKMathaiAMHauboldHJ. On fractional kinetic equations. Astrophys Space Sci. (2002) 282:2817. 10.1023/A:1021175108964

  • 44.

    SaxenaRKMathaiAMHauboldHJ. On generalized fractional kinetic equations. Phys A. (2004) 344:65764. 10.1016/j.physa.1.048

  • 45.

    NisarKSPurohitSDMondalSR. Generalized fractional kinetic equations involving generalized Struve function of the first kind. J King Saud Univ Sci. (2016) 28:16771. 10.1016/j.jksus.1.005

Summary

Keywords

The Mittag-Leffler type function, fractional calculus, fractional kinetic equations; MSC [2000]: 33C05; 33C20; 33E12; 26A33; 44A20; 35Qxx, riemam-liouville derivative, special function

Citation

Nisar KS (2020) Generalized Mittag-Leffler Type Function: Fractional Integrations and Application to Fractional Kinetic Equations. Front. Phys. 8:33. doi: 10.3389/fphy.2020.00033

Received

21 December 2019

Accepted

05 February 2020

Published

28 February 2020

Volume

8 - 2020

Edited by

Devendra Kumar, University of Rajasthan, India

Reviewed by

Haci Mehmet Baskonus, Harran University, Turkey; Yudhveer Singh, Amity University Jaipur, India

Updates

Copyright

*Correspondence: Kottakkaran Sooppy Nisar

This article was submitted to Mathematical Physics, a section of the journal Frontiers in Physics

Disclaimer

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Outline

Cite article

Copy to clipboard


Export citation file


Share article

Article metrics