Abstract
In order to draw a high-quality single-bounce capillary (SBC) to meet various applications, there is an increasing demand for detailed simulations of the SBC. In this study, a code based on the ray-tracing method was developed to simulate SBCs in detail for various X-ray sources to optimize their performances by considering factors such as attenuation of X-rays, coating, X-ray source characteristics (spot-size, distribution of energy, and intensity), surface shape errors, centerline errors, surface roughness, and absorption edges of X-rays. This code has monochrome and polychrome modes which were usually used to simulate the monoenergetic and polyenergetic performances of the SBC.
1 Introduction
The capillary X-ray optics works on total external reflection. When the grazing incidence angle of X-rays is less than the critical angle of total reflection , X-rays can be transmitted on the inner surface of the wall of the capillary. This critical angle depends on the refraction attenuation of the reflective material, and it can be described as follows:where is the real part of X-ray reflection .
According to the number of capillaries, capillary X-ray optics is divided into poly-capillary and mono-capillary X-ray optics. The poly-capillary X-ray optics is drawn from tens of thousands to hundreds of thousands of hollow glass fibers, and each capillary points to the same focal spot, as shown in Figure 1A. Generally, the focal spot size is in the range of tens of microns to hundreds of microns, and the gain in power density can reach the order of 103 [1, 2]. The poly-capillary X-ray optics has been widely used in X-ray fluorescence (XRF) [3], X-ray diffraction (XRD) [4, 5], and X-ray absorption fine structure spectroscopy (XAFS) [6].
FIGURE 1
The mono-capillary X-ray optics drawn by a hollow glass tube can be divided into the multi-bounce capillary (MBC) and single-bounce capillary (SBC) based on the number of total reflections of X-rays on its inner surface. The MBC is often made into tapered surface which is easier to manufacture than the SBC (e.g., parabolic and ellipsoidal capillaries), as shown in Figure 1B. However, the tapered surface capillary has smaller transmission efficiency due to the multiple reflections of X-rays on its inner wall. Compared with the tapered surface capillary, the parabolic and ellipsoidal capillaries can obtain a transmission efficiency larger than 95% by a single X-ray reflection [7], as shown in Figures 1C, D. In addition, the SBC has the advantages of long working distance and controllable divergence, and it is suitable for a larger variety of X-ray microbeam experiments such as X-ray crystallographic analysis [7], X-ray fluorescence imaging [8], and full-field transmission X-ray microscopy [9].
In practice, SBCs typically have centerline and surface shape errors. The centerline errors are the deviations of the actual centerline of the SBC from the theoretical centerline. Also, the surface shape errors are the deviations of the actual surface shape of the SBC from the theoretical surface shape. To draw a high-quality SBC to meet an application, the SBC should be designed specifically, and its various parameters, such as focal spot size, transmission efficiency, working distance, and divergence, should be optimized according to the special requirement of the application. There are some programs for simulating the SBC [10–12]; however, such programs cannot simulate the properties of an SBC with centerline and surface shape errors, and the attenuation of X-rays and X-ray source characteristics is not considered in their simulations. Therefore, a more detailed code should be designed to simulate the properties of an SBC.
In this study, a code based on the ray-tracing method was developed to simulate the SBC for various X-ray sources (e.g., synchrotron radiation source, laboratory source, and secondary X-ray source with focusing optical devices) by considering factors such as attenuation of X-rays, coating, X-ray source characteristics (spot-size, distribution of energy, and intensity), surface shape errors, centerline errors, surface roughness, and absorption edges of X-rays. To adapt to different applications, two working modes were designed. One was a monochrome mode which was usually used to simulate the mono-energetic performances of the SBC, and the other was a polychrome mode for simulating the polyenergetic performances by importing a primary spectrum of the X-ray source into the model.
2 X-ray Transmission Theory
The smooth surface can totally reflect X-rays with a grazing incidence angle that is smaller than the critical angle for total external reflection (Figure 2).
FIGURE 2
For X-rays, the index of refraction can be written as follows: where the real part is related to X-ray reflection and the imaginary part has relations with X-ray absorption.
Relations between the reflectivity R and the incident angle can be given by the continuity conditions of the electric and magnetic fields at the interface [13]. The reflectivity R can be described as follows:where
The inner wall of the SBC is not completely smooth, and the corrected reflectivity by the roughness can be given by [14].where (nm) is the wavelength of incident X-rays and (nm) is the standard deviation of roughness.
Because of the photoelectric interaction, Rayleigh scattering, Compton scattering, and pair production (energy≥1.02 MeV, this effect can be neglected for SBC simulation), the intensity of X-rays passing through the air attenuates. When an X-ray beam with intensity propagates in the air, the intensity of the X-rays transmitted along a length in the air can be expressed as follows:where is the linear attenuation coefficient of the air.
3 Simulation Model
The code is built using MATLAB software. The simulation process is shown in Figure 3. First, the number N of X-ray beams emitted to the SBC was set. Then, the position coordinates, direction vectors, and the energy of the incident X-rays could be sampled. Finally, a series of ray-tracing processes were carried out. Since the ray-tracing method is a commonly used X-ray optical simulation method, it will not be repeated. The detailed description is given in reference [10].
FIGURE 3
This simulation model has two types of X-ray simulation sources: point and planar X-ray sources (Figure 4). The planar X-ray source is more in accordance with the actual X-ray source than the point X-ray source. Therefore, elliptical and rectangular planar X-ray sources were provided to meet different simulation requirements. The model can utilize both uniform and Gaussian X-ray intensity distributions.
FIGURE 4
This simulation model has two modes: monochromatic and polychromatic. In the monochromatic mode, the mono-energetic performances of the SBC were simulated. Compared with the monochromatic mode, the primary spectrum of the X-ray source could be imported into the model to simulate the X-ray transmission in the polychromatic mode. In order to obtain the reflected energy spectrum, the primary spectrum was converted into a probability density distribution of energy E, as shown in Figure 5. The distribution law of the discrete random variable E can be given below:where is a possible value of E.
FIGURE 5
In practice, the centerline error is an important factor affecting the simulation results of the SBC. The ideal centerline of the SBC is a straight line along the y-axis; however, the actual centerline is a three-dimensional space curve, as shown in Figure 6. We assume that is the first centerline data point at the entrance of the SBC and the centerline offsets along the x-axis and z-axis are and , respectively. Therefore, the centerline errors of the SBC can be expressed as . Due to the complexity of the perturbation of the surface shape of the SBC, we simplified the expression of surface shape errors and assumed that the cross-section of the SBC at the coordinate y could be expressed as follows:where a was the semi-axis of the ideal ellipsoid in the x- and z-axis directions.
FIGURE 6
Surface shape errors can be given by . In order to simplify the calculation process, the centerline and surface shape perturbation of the SBC can be fit by polynomial functions . Then, the model of the ellipsoid capillary with centerline and surface shape errors can be expressed as follows:where b is the semi-axis of the ideal ellipsoid in the y-axis direction.
The model of the parabolic capillary with centerline and surface shape errors is built as follows:where is any real number.
4 Simulation
To verify the validity of the code, SBCs for three different X-ray sources were simulated by using polychromatic and monochromatic modes. We studied such parameters of the SBCs, that is, transmission efficiency, focal spot size, and divergence. The transmission efficiency of X-rays through the SBC can be defined as follows:where is the beam flux entering the SBC with a beam stop (Figures 1C, D) and is the beam flux emitted from the outlet of the SBC.
The parameters of the simulation X-ray sources are presented in Table 1. Sources S1 and S2 are synchrotron X-ray sources with focusing optical devices, and S3 is a W-target laboratory X-ray source.
TABLE 1
| X-ray source parameter | S1 | S2 | S3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type of planar source | Elliptic | Elliptic | Circular |
| Spot size (mm) | |||
| Intensity distribution | Gaussian | Gaussian | Gaussian |
| Energy distribution | Monoenergetic | Monoenergetic | W-target |
| Energy range | 0.1–1 keV | 5–20 keV | 5–120 keV |
Parameters of the simulation X-ray sources.
The design parameters of SBCs are shown in Table 2. The El1 is an ellipsoid capillary used for the synchrotron radiation soft X-ray source S1, and Pa1 is a parabolic capillary for the synchrotron radiation hard X-ray source S2 with a quasi-parallel beam. The laboratory X-ray source has relatively less beam flux than synchrotron radiation sources. The coated SBC has a large solid angle for receiving incident X-rays than the uncoated SBC, which improves the beam flux at the focal spot. El2 is an Ir-coated ellipsoidal capillary for the W-target laboratory X-ray source S3, with an energy range of 5–120 keV.
TABLE 2
| Design parameter | El1 | Pa1 | El2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Semi-major axis b (mm) | 300.00 | - | 260.00 |
| Semi-minor axis a (mm) | 3.00 | - | 0.30 |
| Semi-latus rectum (p) | - | 0.00022 | - |
| Length (mm) | 59.24 | 100 | 51.00 |
| Input focal distance (mm) | 523.59 | 34000 | 381.87 |
| Working distance (mm) | 17.14 | 50 | 88.03 |
| Input diameter (mm) | 4.00 | 0.5138 | 0.53 |
| Output diameter (mm) | 2.00 | 0.2966 | 0.45 |
| Cut-off energy (keV) | 1 | 20 | 60 |
| Coating material | - | - | Ir |
Design parameters of SBCs.
5 Results and Discussion
The simulated far-field image of the ellipsoid capillary El1 is presented in Figure 7. The distortion of the focusing ring is related to the centerline and the surface shape errors. If the focusing ring of the SBC has larger distortion, the SBC is of low quality and its parameters (transmission efficiency, focal spot size, and divergence) will have a large deviation from the theoretical design parameters.
FIGURE 7
The divergence angle and focal spot size of SBCs are shown in Table 3. The focal spot size was obtained by fitting the simulated focal spot data with a Gaussian function, and it is the full width at half maximum (FHWM) of the Gaussian fitting function. The synchrotron radiation hard X-ray source S2 has high collimation properties so that the focal spot size of the parabolic capillary Pa1 is smaller than that of the other two SBCs. Due to the large critical total reflection angle of soft X-rays, the SBC used for soft X-rays usually has large acceptance and divergence angles. Therefore, the divergence angles of the ellipsoid capillary El1 are much larger than those of the other two SBCs.
TABLE 3
| Parameter | The types of SBC | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| El1 | Pa1 | El2 | |
| Minimum divergence angle (mrad) | 53.21 | 3.50 | 3.78 |
| Maximum divergence angle (mrad) | 116.78 | 6.05 | 5.13 |
| Focal spot size (μm) | 30.01 ± 1.50 | 2.66 ± 0.51 | 11.98 ± 0.60 |
Divergence angle and focal spot size of SBCs.
Figure 8 shows the evolution of the focal spot size with the distance to the focal spot. When the incident X-ray energy is less than the cut-off energy, the focal spot characteristics are energy-independent [15]. Therefore, it was only necessary to study the focal spot characteristics of a certain energy. As shown in Figure 8A, the X-ray beams exited from the ellipsoid capillary El1 were first focused to a minimum focal spot size, and then they were rapidly defocused so that the ellipsoid capillary El1 had a shorter focal depth. The non-strictly parallel incident X-rays resulted in an asymmetry in a focal spot size of the parabolic capillary Pa1 between 0.0 and 1.0 mm and 0.0 and 1.0 mm, as shown in Figure 8B.
FIGURE 8
Figure 9 shows the energy dependence of the transmission efficiency for the ellipsoid capillary El1 and parabolic capillary Pa1. Since the SBC is usually made of borosilicate glass with a large amount of oxygen, X-rays at the absorption edge of oxygen are strongly absorbed, which can lead to lower transmission efficiency of the ellipsoid capillary El1 at an energy of 0.543 keV, as shown in Figure 9A. The transmission efficiency of the parabolic capillary Pa1 was greater than 95% in the energy range of 5–20 keV, as shown in Figure 9B. Therefore, it is necessary to consider the absorption edge effect in the simulation of the SBC for soft X-rays.
FIGURE 9
Figure 10 shows normalized spectrums of the reflected X-rays of the ellipsoid capillary El2. We compared the polyenergetic performances of the Ir-coated ellipsoid capillary and uncoated ones for the W-target laboratory X-ray source S3. The transmission efficiency of the uncoated ellipsoid capillary El2 rapidly decreased to zero at the energy of 20 keV. The critical angle of total reflection of the Ir-coated capillary was increased by 1.77 times. Hence, in the energy range greater than 20 keV, the transmission efficiency of the Ir-coated ellipsoid capillary El2 had a significant increase compared to that of the uncoated ones. In addition, when the energy is greater than 60 keV, the incident angle of the Ir-coated capillary was smaller than the critical angle of total reflection , which leads to the transmission efficiency decreasing to zero quickly. Therefore, the coating could enhance the performance of the SBC to reflect high-energy X-rays.
FIGURE 10
6 Conclusion
To meet the rapid development of the SBC, a code for various types of X-ray sources was proposed to optimize their performance by considering such factors (e.g., attenuation of X-rays, roughness, coating, X-ray source characteristics, surface shape error, centerline error, surface roughness, and absorption edges of X-ray). Also, we have given two different modes: monochrome and polychrome modes. The monochromatic mode is usually used for the simulation of the SBC of the synchrotron radiation source. For the polychrome mode, the primary spectrum of the practical X-ray source can be imported into the program to simulate the SBC parameters, which is more in accordance with reality. In addition, the reflected energy spectrum can be obtained in the polychromatic mode, which can help scientists design the SBC that is most suitable for their application.
Although only the ellipsoid and parabolic capillary models are established in Sec.3, they can be easily extended to other types of capillaries, such as hyperbolic, double parabolic, and Walter-1. Relevant investigations on these topics will be carried out in the near future.
Statements
Data availability statement
The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/Supplementary Material; further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding authors.
Author contributions
SS: simulation, methodology, and writing. HL: investigation. XZ: investigation. TY: investigation. LH: investigation. XS: supervision. ZL: supervision. TS: methodology and supervision.
Funding
This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos 11875087 and 12105220), the Chinese National Key Research and Development Plan (No. 2018YFF0109100), the Chinese Academy of Sciences Key Technology Research and Development Team (No. GJJSTD20170005), and the Beijing Academy of Science and Technology (No. BGS202106).
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors, and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
References
1.
GuilhermeABuzanichGCarvalhoML. Focusing Systems for the Generation of X-ray Micro Beam: An Overview. Spectrochimica Acta B: At Spectrosc (2012) 77:1–8. 10.1016/j.sab.2012.07.021
2.
MacDonaldCA. Focusing Polycapillary Optics and Their Applications. X-ray Opt Instrumentation (2010) 2010:17. 10.1155/2010/867049
3.
PengSLiuZSunTMaYDingX. Spatially Resolved In Situ Measurements of the Ion Distribution Near the Surface of Electrode in a Steady-State Diffusion in an Electrolytic Tank with Confocal Micro X-ray Fluorescence. Anal Chem (2014) 86:362–6. 10.1021/ac403188k
4.
SunTLiuHLiuZPengSMaYSunWet alApplication of Confocal Technology Based on Polycapillary X-ray Optics in Three-Dimensional Diffraction Scanning Analysis. Nucl Instr Methods Phys Res Section B: Beam Interactions Mater Atoms (2014) 323:25–9. 10.1016/j.nimb.2014.01.013
5.
YamanashiMTsujiK. Development of Full-Field XRD (FFXRD) Imaging Method Realized in the Laboratory Using a Straight Polycapillary and In Situ Observation of the Oxidation Process of Cu by Heat Treatment. E-j Surf Sci Nanotec (2020) 18:1–7. 10.1380/ejssnt.2020.1
6.
SunTLiuZDingX. Characterization of a Polycapillary Focusing X-ray Lens for Application in Spatially Resolved EXAFS Experiments. Chem Phys Lett (2007) 439:412–4. 10.1016/j.cplett.2007.03.105
7.
BilderbackDHHuangR. X-ray Tests of Microfocusing Mono-Capillary Optic for Protein Crystallography. Nucl Instr Methods Phys Res Section A: Acc Spectrometers, Detectors Associated Equipment (2001) 467-468:970–3. 10.1016/s0168-9002(01)00543-5
8.
WollARMassJBisulcaCHuangRBilderbackDHGrunerSet alDevelopment of Confocal X-ray Fluorescence (XRF) Microscopy at the Cornell High Energy Synchrotron Source. Appl Phys A (2006) 83:235–8. 10.1007/s00339-006-3513-4
9.
ZengXDuewerFFeserMHuangCLyonATkachukAet alEllipsoidal and Parabolic Glass Capillaries as Condensers for X-ray Microscopes. Appl Opt (2008) 47:2376–81. 10.1364/ao.47.002376
10.
LinXLiuALiYWuP. A MATLAB Programming for Simulation of X-ray Capillaries. Appl Math Comput (2006) 172:188–97. 10.1016/j.amc.2005.01.150
11.
LiuA. Simulation of X-ray Propagation in a Straight Capillary. Mathematics Comput Simulation (2004) 65:251–6. 10.1016/j.matcom.2004.01.001
12.
LiuALinY. Simulation of X-ray Transmission in Capillaries with Different Profiles. Math Comput Simulation (2004) 66:577–84. 10.1016/j.matcom.2004.05.001
13.
TakanoAMaehataKIyomotoNHaraTMitsudaKYamasakiNet alSimulation Model of Transmitted X-Rays in Polycapillary Optics for TES Microcalorimeter EDS System on Scanning Transmission Electron Microscope. IEEE Trans Nucl Sci (2018) 65:758–65. 10.1109/tns.2017.2786703
14.
ZymierskaD. Determination of Surface Roughness Bu Grazing Incidence X-ray Reflectivity. Acta Phys Pol A (1996) 89:347–52. 10.12693/aphyspola.89.347
15.
HuangRBilderbackDH. Simulation of Microfocused Image Size from a One-Bounce Glass Capillary. Nucl Instr Methods Phys Res Section A: Acc Spectrometers, Detectors Associated Equipment (2001) 467-468:978–81. 10.1016/s0168-9002(01)00546-0
Summary
Keywords
mono-capillary X-ray optics, single-bounce capillary, simulation, X-ray, mono-capillary
Citation
Shao S, Li H, Yuan T, Zhang X, Hua L, Sun X, Liu Z and Sun T (2022) Detailed Simulation of Single-Bounce Capillaries for Various X-Ray Sources. Front. Phys. 10:816981. doi: 10.3389/fphy.2022.816981
Received
17 November 2021
Accepted
22 April 2022
Published
08 June 2022
Volume
10 - 2022
Edited by
Ming Li, Institute of High Energy Physics (CAS), China
Reviewed by
P. S. Athiray, University of Alabama in Huntsville, United States
Manish Sharma, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (DOE), United States
Updates
Copyright
© 2022 Shao, Li, Yuan, Zhang, Hua, Sun, Liu and Sun.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Tianxi Sun, stx@bnu.edu.cn
This article was submitted to Optics and Photonics, a section of the journal Frontiers in Physics
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.