MINI REVIEW article
Front. Phys.
Sec. Interdisciplinary Physics
This article is part of the Research TopicAI for Physics and Physics for AIView all 8 articles
Designing particle physics experiments with artificial intelligence
Provisionally accepted- 1ETH Zürich, Zurich, Switzerland
- 2Universitat Zurich, Zürich, Switzerland
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
The design of modern particle physics detectors can become a strong benchmark for contemporary machine-learning techniques. It offers a realistic large-scale optimization task grounded in well-understood physics and reliable simulations, providing a controlled setting to test methods aimed at complex real-world problems; the proposed Future Circular Collider is a prominent example of the scale and ambition involved. This review introduces the detector-optimization problem and discusses the growing interest in applying AI methods to detector design, providing a comparative perspective on various methodologies. We show how a specific version of the detector-optimization problem can, and has been, tackled with Bayesian optimization and gradient-based methods, while reinforcement learning addresses a more general formulation that includes sequential and combinatorial structure. The substantial computational burden of Monte Carlo simulation remains a central obstacle, for which we outline how generative machine-learning approaches offer effective mitigation. We also discuss how uncertainty, arising from stochastic detector response, systematic shifts in physics modelling and reconstruction, and long-term operating conditions, can be incorporated into the design process. In particular, we discuss how distributional and distributionally robust reinforcement learning, together with optimal-transport–based ambiguity sets, provides a principled way to capture plausible deviations from nominal assumptions and to search for designs that maintain reliable performance across varied scenarios.
Keywords: Differential programming, Generative AI, instrument design, machine learning, Particle physics, reinforcement learning, Robust optimisation
Received: 10 Dec 2025; Accepted: 14 Jan 2026.
Copyright: © 2026 Figalli, Qasim, Owen and Serra. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Alessio Figalli
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
