We would like to apply a correction to the pay-off distributions of the Soochow Gambling Task presented in Table 2 of the manuscript. Decks C and D do not yield a gain on every trial, which has been corrected with the addition of a “–” in columns representing decks C and D. Furthermore, the 5th and 10th trials for both decks C and D in the Soochow Gambling Task, are associated with a win of $5.25 and $3.25, respectively. This was previously not shown in the table and has been inserted.
Table 2
| IGT | A | B | C | D | SGT | A | B | C | D |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Expected value of 10 trials | −$2.50 | −$2.50 | $2.50 | $2.50 | Expected value of 5 trials | −$2.50 | −$2.50 | $2.50 | $2.50 |
| Gain on every trial | $1.00 | $1.00 | $0.50 | $0.50 | Gain on every trial | $1.00 | $0.50 | – | – |
| Loss on each trial | Loss on each trial | ||||||||
| Trial 1 | −$1.00 | −$0.50 | |||||||
| Trial 2 | −$1.00 | −$0.50 | |||||||
| Trial 3 | −$1.00 | −$0.50 | |||||||
| Trial 4 | −$1.00 | −$0.50 | |||||||
| Trial 5 | −$5.25 | −$3.25 | +$5.25 | +$3.25 | |||||
| Trial 6 | −$1.50 | −$0.25 | $1.00 | −$0.50 | |||||
| Trial 7 | −$2.00 | −$0.75 | $1.00 | −$0.50 | |||||
| Trial 8 | −$2.50 | −$0.50 | $1.00 | −$0.50 | |||||
| Trial 9 | −$3.00 | −$0.50 | $1.00 | −$0.50 | |||||
| Trial 10 | −$3.50 | −$12.50 | −$0.50 | −$2.50 | −$5.25 | −$3.25 | +$5.25 | +$3.25 |
The pay-off distributions of the Iowa Gambling Task and Soochow Gambling Task for the first 10 trials, adapted and modified from Ahn et al. ().
References
1
AhnW. Y.BusemeyerJ. R.Wagen-makersE. J.StoutJ. C. (2008). Comparison of decision learning models using the generalization criterion method. Cogn. Sci. 32, 1376–1402. 10.1080/03640210802352992
Summary
Keywords
Iowa Gambling Task, Soochow Gambling Task, Choice Behavior, decision-making, opiate users, Drug Users
Citation
Upton DJ, Kerestes R and Stout JC (2013) Erratum: “Comparing the Iowa and Soochow gambling tasks in opiate users”. Front. Psychol. 4:85. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00085
Received
06 February 2013
Accepted
06 February 2013
Published
26 February 2013
Volume
4 - 2013
Edited by
Scott A. Huettel, Duke University, USA
Reviewed by
Scott A. Huettel, Duke University, USA
Copyright
© 2013 Upton, Kerestes and Stout.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in other forums, provided the original authors and source are credited and subject to any copyright notices concerning any third-party graphics etc.
*Correspondence: julie.stout@monash.edu
This article was submitted to Frontiers in Decision Neuroscience, a specialty of Frontiers in Psychology.
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.