A clear example of the progress in the field of timing and time perception could be obtained by contrasting two articles published 30 years apart in the influential Annual Review of Psychology (ARP): one by Fraisse (), and one by Allman et al. (). The fact that there was one author 30 years ago, and a group of authors now, is a tangible sign of the contemporary way of approaching scientific research. In his review, Fraisse emphasized the distinction between time perception and time estimation; in their review, Allman et al. focused on the internal clock and the cerebral bases of timing and time perception.
Fraisse's review was published when a very important event happened in the field of timing and time perception: a conference was held in New York, in 1983, where researchers from both human and animal time perception met to communicate with one another. The conference led to the publication of the classical book edited by the late John Gibbon and the late Lorraine Allan (Gibbon and Allan, ). This meeting probably catalyzed the research on timing and time perception, especially the one emphasizing the scalar expectancy theory and, more generally speaking, the internal clock perspective, a clock described as a pacemaker-counter device.
It is somewhat surprising that there was no mention in Fraisse () of this promising (to say the least) pacemaker-counter perspective, which was already available in the human timing literature (Creelman, ; Treisman, ). Moreover, the modest portions of information in Fraisse dedicated to the cerebral bases of timing exemplify the gap between the contemporary research in the field and the state of the literature 30 years ago.
With its emphasis on neuroscience literature (e.g., brain areas, cortical circuits, pharmacological effects, and pathologies), Allman et al. wrote an important, well-structured, and interesting state-of-the-art review on the cerebral bases of the time perception mechanisms. It is a bit surprising though that the scalar property is taken for granted, given actually Fraisse's fundamental distinction between time perception and time estimation, a distinction that could find some echoes in the limitation of the stability of the Weber fraction for time (see Figure 3 in Gibbon et al., ; or, for instance, Grondin, , , , ). Moreover, assuming the linearity between psychological and physical time (psychophysical law) remains disputable (Eisler, ).
By emphasizing the internal clock perspective, it was not possible for Allman et al. () to refer to other recent developments in the field. Amongst the portions of the literature the reader might want to consider, there is one on retrospective timing (Block and Zakay, ; Tobin et al., ). There is also some interesting research (e.g., Boltz, ; Brown, ) offering a purely cognitive explanation of psychological time and timing—without reference to an internal clock (see reviews by Block et al., , ; Block, ). Even within the perspective of an internal clock, the attentional-gate model (see for example, Zakay and Block, and later articles), which in an extension of the scalar expectancy theory, is worth mentioning.
Indeed, with the large increase of research in the field of timing and time perception in the Twenty-first century, it is not surprising to see so many recent special issues of journals on this topic, or close variants of them. The explosion is such that researchers have written a large number of recent review articles (see Table 1). This was partly described in an annotated bibliography on “Time Perception” (Block and Hancock, ). Another tangible sign of the vitality of this research field is exemplified by a large COST grant funded by the E.U. (title: “Time In MEntaL activitY,” or “TIMELY”) and the resulting founding of the Brill's new scientific journal dedicated to the psychology of time, Timing and Time Perception, co-edited by Meck et al.
Table 1
| Type | Authors | Year | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| Book | Merchant and de Lafuente | Neurobiology of interval timing | |
| SI | Medina et al. | Advances in modern mental chronometry | |
| Book | Vatakis and Allman | Time distortions in mind: temporal processing in clinical populations. | |
| Rev | Allman et al. | Properties of the internal clock: first- and second-order principles of subjective time | |
| Rev | Block and Gruber | Time perception, attention, and memory: a selective review | |
| SI | Broadway et al. | The long and short of mental time travel– self-projection over time-scales large and small | |
| SI | Buhusi | Associative and temporal learning: New directions | |
| Book | Lloyd and Arstila | Subjective time: the philosophy, psychology, and neuroscience of temporality | |
| Rev | Matthews and Meck | Temporal perception: the bad news and the good | |
| SI | Tucci et al. | Timing in neurobiological processes: from genes to behavior compiled | |
| SI | Vatakis and Ulrich | Temporal processing within and across senses (two Acta Psychologica special issues) | |
| Bib | Block and Hancock | Time perception (annotated bibliography) | |
| SI | Coull et al. | How does the brain process time? | |
| Rev | Merchant et al. | Neural basis of the perception and estimation of time | |
| Rev | Wittmann | The inner sense of time: how the brain creates a representation of duration | |
| Rev | Allman and Meck | Pathophysiological distortions in time perception and timed performance | |
| Rev | Hancock and Block | The psychology of Time: a view backward and forward | |
| SI | Meck et al. | Interval timing and time-based decision making | |
| Rev | Coull et al. | Neuroanatomical and neurochemical substrates of timing | |
| Rev | Gorea | Ticks per thought or thoughts per tick? A selective review of time perception with hints on future research | |
| SI | Vatakis et al. | Multidisciplinary aspects of time and time perception | |
| Rev | Block et al. | How cognitive load affects duration judgments: a meta-analytic review | |
| Rev | Grondin | Timing and time perception: a review of recent behavioral and neuroscience findings and theoretical directions |
Selected list (in reverse chronological order) of reviews since 2010 on the psychology of time.
Book is an edited book. Rev is a review article. SI is a special issue. Bib is a bibliography.
In conclusion, being a researcher in the field of timing and time perception has never been as exciting as it is at present, given the growth of its popularity, which has been enhanced by the arrival of contributions from neuroscientists. This excitement could be extended if one considers psychological time in an even larger perspective, or larger scale from the memory for the past events (Friedman, ) to the capacity to predict the duration of future events (Roy et al., ).
Statements
Acknowledgments
We thank Keith Hutchison and an anonymous reviewer for their very helpful suggestions on drafts of this commentary.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
References
1
AllmanM. J.MeckW. H. (2012). Pathophysiological distortions in time perception and timed performance. Brain135, 656–677. 10.1093/brain/awr210
2
AllmanM. J.TekiS.GriffithsT. D.MeckW. H. (2014). Properties of the internal clock: first- and second-order principles of subjective time. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 65, 743–771. 10.1146/annurev-psych-010213-115117
3
BlockR. A. (2003). Psychological timing without a timer: the roles of attention and memory, in Time and Mind II, ed HelfrichH. (Cambridge, MA: Hogrefe & Huber), 41–60.
4
BlockR. A.GruberR. P. (2014). Time perception, attention, and memory: a selective review. Acta Psychol. 149, 129–133. 10.1016/j.actpsy.2013.11.003
5
BlockR. A.HancockP. A. (2013). Time perception, in Annotated Bibliography (Oxford Online Bibliographies), 284–295. http://www.oxfordbibliographies.com
6
BlockR. A.HancockP. A.ZakayD. (2010). How cognitive load affects duration judgments: a meta-analytic review. Acta Psychol. 134, 330–343. 10.1016/j.actpsy.2010.03.006
7
BlockR. A.ZakayD. (1997). Prospective and retrospective duration judgments: a meta-analytic review. Psychon. Bull. Rev. 4, 184–197. 10.3758/BF03209393
8
BlockR. A.ZakayD.HancockP. A. (1999). Developmental changes in human duration judgments: a meta-analytic review. Dev. Rev. 19, 183–211. 10.1006/drev.1998.0475
9
BoltzM. G. (1998). The processing of temporal and nontemporal information in the remembering of event durations and musical structure. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 24, 1087–1104. 10.1037/0096-1523.24.4.1087
10
BroadwayJ. M.ZedeliusC.SchoolerJ.GrondinS. (2014). The long and short of mental time travel- self-projection over time-scales large and small. Front. Psychol. Perception Science.
11
BrownS. W. (2008). Time and attention: review of the literature, in Psychology of Time, ed GrondinS. (Bingley: Emerald), 111–138.
12
BuhusiC. V. (2014). Associative and temporal learning: new directions. Behav. Process. 101, 1–3. 10.1016/j.beproc.2014.01.005
13
CoullJ. T.ChengR.-K.MeckW. H. (2011). Neuroanatomical and neurochemical substrates of timing. Neuropsychopharmacology36, 3–25. 10.1038/npp.2010.113
14
CoullJ. T.Van WassenhoveV.CoslettH. B. (eds.). (2013). How does the brain process time?Neuropsychologia51, 187–384.
15
CreelmanC. D. (1962). Human discrimination of auditory duration. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 34, 582–593. 10.1121/1.1918172
16
EislerH. (1976). Experiments on subjective duration 1878–1975: a collection of power function exponents. Psychol. Bull. 83, 185–200. 10.1037/0033-2909.83.6.1154
17
FraisseP. (1984). Perception and estimation of time. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 35, 1–36. 10.1146/annurev.ps.35.020184.000245
18
FriedmanW. J. (1993). Memory for the time of past events. Psychol. Bull. 113, 44–66. 10.1037/0033-2909.113.1.44
19
GibbonJ.AllanL. G. (eds.). (1984). Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences. Vol. 423. Timing and Time Perception. New York, NY: New York Academy of Sciences.
20
GibbonJ.MalapaniC.DaleC. L.GallistelC. (1997). Toward a neurobiology of temporal cognition: advances and challenges. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 7, 170–184. 10.1016/S0959-4388(97)80005-0
21
GoreaA. (2011). Ticks per thought or thoughts per tick? A selective review of time perception with hints on future research. J. Physiol. 105, 153–163. 10.1016/j.jphysparis.2011.09.008
22
GrondinS. (2001). From physical time to the first and second moments of psychological time. Psychol. Bull. 127, 22–44. 10.1037/0033-2909.127.1.22
23
GrondinS. (2010a). Timing and time perception: a review of recent behavioral and neuroscience findings and theoretical directions. Atten. Percept. Psychophys. 72, 561–582. 10.3758/APP.72.3.561
24
GrondinS. (2010b). Unequal Weber fraction for the categorization of brief temporal intervals. Atten. Percept. Psychophys. 72, 1422–1430. 10.3758/APP.72.5.1422
25
GrondinS. (2012). Violation of the scalar property for time perception between 1 and 2 seconds: evidence from interval discrimination, reproduction, and categorization. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 38, 880–890. 10.1037/a0027188
26
GrondinS. (2015). About the (non)scalar property for time perception, in Neurobiology of Interval Timing, eds MerchantH.de LafuenteV. (New York, NY: Springer).
27
HancockP. A.BlockR. A. (2012). The psychology of time: A view backward and forward. Am. J. Psychol. 125, 267–274. 10.5406/amerjpsyc.125.3.0267
28
LloydD.ArstilaV. (eds.). (2014). Subjective Time: The Philosophy, Psychology, and Neuroscience of Temporality. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
29
MatthewsW. J.MeckW. H. (2014). Time perception: the bad news and the good. WIREs Cogn. Sci. 5, 429–446. 10.1002/wcs.1298
30
MeckW. H.DoyèreV.GruartA. (2012). Interval timing and time-based decision making. Front. Integr. Neurosci. 6:13. 10.3389/fnint.2012.00013
31
MedinaJ. M.WongW.DíazJ. A.ColoniusH. (2014). Advances in modern mental chronometry. Front. Hum. Neurosci.
32
MerchantH.de LafuenteV. (eds.). (2015). Neurobiology of Interval Timing. New York, NY: Springer.
33
MerchantH.HarringtonD. L.MeckW. H. (2013). Neural basis of the perception and estimation of time. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 36, 313–336. 10.1146/annurev-neuro-062012-170349
34
RoyM. M.ChristenfeldN. J. S.McKenzieC. R. M. (2005). Underestimation of future duration: memory incorrectly used or memory bias. Psychol. Bull. 131, 738–756. 10.1037/0033-2909.131.5.738
35
TobinS.BissonN.GrondinS. (2010). An ecological approach to prospective and retrospective timing of long durations: a study involving gamers. PLoS ONE5:e9271. 10.1371/journal.pone.0009271
36
TreismanM. (1963). Temporal discrimination and the indifference interval: implications for a model of the “internal clock.”Psychol. Monogr. 77, 576. 10.1037/h0093864
37
TucciV.BuhusiC. V.GallistelR.MeckW. H. (2014). Timing in neurobiological processes: from genes to behaviour compiled. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B369:20120470. 10.1098/rstb.2012.0470
38
VatakisA.AllmanM. J. (eds.) (2014). Time Distortions in Mind: Temporal Processing in Clinical Populations. Boston, MA: Brill Academic Publishers.
39
VatakisA.EspositoA.GiagkouM.CumminsF.PapadelisG. (2011). Multidisciplinary Aspects of Time and Time Perception. Vol. 6789. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Berlin: Springer. 10.1007/978-3-642-21478-3
40
VatakisA.UlrichR. (eds.). (2014). Temporal processing within and across senses. Acta Psychol. (Amst.) 147(pt 1 and 2), 149. 10.1016/j.actpsy.2014.01.001
41
WittmannM. (2013). The inner sense of time: how the brain creates a representation of duration. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 14, 217–223. 10.1038/nrn3452
42
ZakayD.BlockR. A. (1995). An attentional-gate model of prospective time estimation, in Time and the Dynamic Control of Behavior, eds RichelleM.KeyserV. D.d'YdewalleG.VandierendonckA. (Liège, Belgium: Université de Liège), 167–178.
Summary
Keywords
time perception, attention, animals, humans, commentary
Citation
Block RA and Grondin S (2014) Timing and time perception: A selective review and commentary on recent reviews. Front. Psychol. 5:648. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00648
Received
02 May 2014
Accepted
06 June 2014
Published
29 July 2014
Volume
5 - 2014
Edited by
Claire Zedelius, University of California, Santa Barbara, USA
Reviewed by
Hedderik Van Rijn, University of Groningen, Netherlands
Copyright
© 2014 Block and Grondin.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: block@montana.edu
This article was submitted to Perception Science, a section of the journal Frontiers in Psychology.
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.