Error in table
In the original article, there was a mistake in Table 1 as published. Due to a tabulation error, the total number of critical lures recalled was reported incorrectly. The corrected Table 1 appears below. The authors apologize for this error and state that this does not change the scientific conclusions of the article in any way.
Table 1
| Dependent measure | No noise | Noise | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| M | SD | M | SD | |
| Mean number of spoken words correctly recalled per list | 10.45 | 0.67 | 8.78 | 0.58 |
| Mean number of spoken words per theme correctly recalled per list | 4.41 | 1.09 | 3.60 | 0.89 |
| Mean number of themes correctly recalled per list | 2.62 | 0.34 | 2.48 | 0.42 |
| Total number of critical lures recalled | 2.42 | 0.37 | 1.46 | 0.19 |
| Thematic (Semantic)-clustering (Z scores) | 2.43 | 0.20 | 1.95 | 0.16 |
| Total number of critical lures recalled | 2.42 | 0.37 | 1.46 | 0.19 |
Mean recall performance for the four recall measures as a function of two background conditions (no noise vs. noise) used in the study.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Statements
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Summary
Keywords
noise, elaborative processing, false recall, semantic clustering, speech intelligibility
Citation
Marsh JE, Ljung R, Nöstl A, Threadgold E and Campbell TA (2017) Corrigendum: Failing to get the gist of what's being said: background noise impairs higher-order cognitive processing. Front. Psychol. 8:390. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00390
Received
31 January 2017
Accepted
01 March 2017
Published
28 March 2017
Volume
8 - 2017
Edited and reviewed by
Jerker Rönnberg, Linköping University, Sweden
Updates
Copyright
© 2017 Marsh, Ljung, Nöstl, Threadgold and Campbell.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: John E. Marsh JEMarsh@uclan.ac.uk
This article was submitted to Auditory Cognitive Neuroscience, a section of the journal Frontiers in Psychology
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.