Abstract
The present study investigated the mediating role of behavioral difficulties, coping strategies, and social functional support in the relationship between symptoms severity and parenting stress in mothers of children with ASD (autism spectrum disorder). The parenting stress questionnaire, coping orientation to problems experienced scale, strengths and difficulties questionnaire, and Duke-UNC social support questionnaire were administered to 52 mothers, who also estimated the ASD severity symptoms of their children. Correlation analyses revealed that parenting stress was positively correlated with the children’s ASD symptoms and behavioral problems. On the other hand, parenting stress was negatively correlated with the engagement coping and social functional support reported by the mothers. Multiple mediation analysis indicated that engagement coping and behavioral difficulties were significant mediators in the relationship between ASD symptoms and parenting stress, with the engagement variable having a larger effect. The findings illustrate the need to promote the mothers’ engagement coping orientation and the application of behavioral strategies with their children to help them to buffer the impact of stress.
Introduction
Autism spectrum disorder (ASD) is considered a complex neurodevelopmental disorder characterized by persistent alterations in communication and social interaction and by the presence of stereotyped patterns of behavior, activities, and interests (). Its prevalence has multiplied by four in the past decade, with a rate of 1 in 59 children in the United States, according to the Center for Disease Control and Prevention (). The data on the estimated prevalence in Spain, reaching 1.55% in preschoolers and 1.00% in school-age children, are close to the international ratings ().
Autism spectrum disorder is a lifetime, generally stable condition that involves persistent impairments in language, social skills, and daily life activities. Difficulties in child-rearing, which are present from early ages, put strong pressure on parenting skills. They can produce stress if the parents’ perceptions of the demands of their parental role exceed their coping resources, without being able to restore an equilibrium through the usual methods and strategies. The stress of parents of children with ASD, which reaches clinically significant levels in 77% of the cases (), is greater than the stress of parents with children with typical development (; ; ; ). Furthermore, it exceeds, with a large effect size, the stress of parents with children with other neurodevelopmental disorders, such as specific learning disorders, intellectual disabilities, Down syndrome, cerebral palsy, externalizing behaviors, or attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (; ; ; ; ).
During the decades of research on parenting stress, the construct has become more dynamic, integrating the capacity of the family system to successfully adapt to the significant challenge of raising a child with ASD. Scholars have shifted the focus from models based only on family crisis to those emphasizing adaptation. The Double ABCX Model of adjustment and adaptation () emphasizes coping and social support as facilitators of the family’s adaptation to crisis, thus recognizing the importance of understanding influences that promote adaptation and buffer the effects of the risks. Parenting stress depends on a set of risk factors with interrelated strengths, including the personal characteristics of the individual with ASD, social support, and the family’s coping strategies. Together, these factors contribute to a family’s overall perceived stress and adaptation.
Risk Factors of Parenting Stress
The conceptualization of autism as a spectrum disorder has resulted in a cohort of children with a wide range of behavioral profiles in terms of symptoms and presentations that may differentially impact parenting stress. At the cognitive or developmental level, symptom severity and the frequency and severity of behavioral difficulties are some of the relevant child characteristics that may act as stressors.
Although the greatest increase in the prevalence of ASD in recent years has occurred in the subgroup without intellectual handicap, referred to as “high-functioning autism” (), the influence of the child’s IQ (intellectual quotient) level on family functioning has hardly been studied. Around 70% of parents of children with Asperger syndrome score at or above the 90th percentile of the normal parental stress scores (). Therefore, it appears that a high level of cognitive development does not in itself buffer the effects of the stress produced by raising a child with ASD. Parents of children with high-functioning autism report significantly higher levels of stress and lower levels of adaptive coping and resources than parents of children with typical development. They also describe numerous negative experiences and lower quality of life, compared to parents of typically developing children ().
In any case, it is necessary to examine the specific data found when analyzing different domains of parenting stress, in order to clarify the possible influence of cognitive development. The relationship that has arisen between higher stress levels and the difficult child from the PSI subcategory suggests that the parents of children with ASD without intellectual disability (ID) experience difficulties in managing the child’s basic behavior. This situation is related to the temperament of the child as well as learned patterns of defiance, non-compliance, and demanding behaviors (; ). Along the same lines, the differences found have been on the total score on the PSI and the score in the child domain, but not in the parent domain. This means that the parents identify family stress as being directly related to behavioral factors of the child, such as hyperactivity, demandingness, and disturbed mood (). However, in other studies, the IQ level appears to be associated with parenting stress (), specifically manipulative IQ ().
Finally, behaviors that are specific to autism have shown the capacity to predict parental stress. The severity of the core features of autism is positively related to both parenting stress and maternal psychopathology symptoms (). Specifically, self-isolated/ritualistic and repetitive behaviors are associated with poorer parent outcomes and with the mothers’ anxiety and depression, even when controlling for externalizing behaviors (; ). By contrast, other studies found no association between the severity of the autism symptoms and parental stress (; ; ).
Emotional and behavioral problems (EBPs) have been reported in children with ASD to a greater extent than what is commonly found in their TD peers (; ). In a population sample, 92% of children with ASD had two or more comorbid problems (). The most common impairing comorbid conditions are attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder, oppositional defiant disorder, peer problems, and anxiety disorder (). The review by , based on 133 studies, documents the link between parental stress and the behavioral problems of children with ASD, especially highlighting externalizing problems (ES r weighted = 0.57, d = 1.39). The results agree with those from an exhaustive meta-analysis of the growing body of literature on the topic, which also concludes that relationships between additional EBP in children with ASD and psychological distress in their parents have been demonstrated (). These relationships are maintained over time, as the results of a longitudinal study with a follow-up assessment after 4 years reveal. Moreover, the lack of perceived change in the child’s problems is one of the factors that may justify, at least partly, the absence of changes in the levels of parenting stress, thus indicating the importance of intervention ().
The relationship between EBP and parenting stress becomes more evident at around 6 years old (). The parents probably focus their first concerns on “early autism” skill deficits, such as lack of joint attention, social responsiveness, or communication skills. However, when the children get older, parents may experience more stress because of internalizing and externalizing behaviors, which, in addition to being difficult to control, are socially stigmatizing.
Parenting stress is strongly predicted by EBP, above and beyond other characteristics of their children with autism, such as the severity of the autistic symptoms () and adaptive behaviors (). When investigating the relationship between EBP and parenting stress, interesting nuances emerge. The problems of children with ASD seem to affect different domains of parenting stress. Hence, behavioral and emotional problems significantly predict parental distress, whereas stress related to a dysfunctional parent–child relationship is associated with daily living, communication skills, and cognitive abilities ().
Protective Factors Against Parenting Stress
The characteristics of the child with ASD have been identified as a possible source of stress for families. However, some families, despite the difficulties, have still managed to achieve successful psychological adaptation. In particular, the analysis of the dynamics in families with chronic stressors requires complex models such as the Double ABCX Model of family stress and adaptation (). This model is able to discriminate between balanced and imbalanced families faced with chronic tension, obtaining a clearer picture of the differences.
The Double ABCX Model has been widely used to study the adjustment and adaptation process in families of children with disabilities, and specifically in families of children with ASD (). In this model, family adaptation is considered a continuous variable ranging from maladaptation to bonadaptation. Maladaptation is defined as a continuous mismatch between the demands and the family’s capacity to cope with them, whereas bonadaptation is defined as a minimal discrepancy between the demands and the family’s capabilities, in order to achieve a balance in family functioning. Although it has undergone several revisions, the original formulation focusing on crisis variables in families is still relevant and in use: A (the crisis-precipitating event/stressor); B (the family’s crisis-meeting resources); C (the definition the family makes of the event), and X (the crisis). Thus, the model explains the factors associated with families’ adjustment to chronic stressors, including life tensions prior to or following the stressful event, the outcomes of family processes in response to the stressor (in terms of resources and the definition of the event), and finally factors that are part of the family’s attempt to adapt to the crisis, such as coping skills and social support.
Coping strategies refer to a group of behavioral or cognitive efforts aimed at reducing stress levels, and they are considered a tool parents can use to adapt to the stressors associated with raising a child with ASD. Coping strategies in studies with parents of children with ASD have generally been evaluated with the “Ways of Coping Questionnaire” (WOC; ) or the “Coping Orientation to Problems Experienced” (COPE, ). Despite the different classifications proposed, two blocks of coping strategies have been emphasized: problem-focused coping strategies, which aim to solve the problem or do something to actively change one’s perception of a stressor (e.g., engagement and positive reframing), and emotion-focused coping strategies, which aim to reduce or manage the feelings of distress (e.g., escape-avoidance, denial, and distraction).
Parents who adopt positive and problem-focused strategies report less stress and better well-being than those who often use emotion-focused coping strategies, which are ineffective and do not resolve the adverse situation that provokes the stress (; ; ; ; ; ; ; ). Coping strategies and support needs serve as predictors of maternal stress, which declines by 0.402 points for each percent of increase in helpful coping strategies ().
However, child characteristics moderate the effect of coping strategies on maternal outcomes, so that engagement has a significant positive effect on maternal well-being in cases where the child’s symptoms are more severe (). The mother’s tiredness has been revealed as an essential variable in this relationship. It is likely that the child’s behavioral difficulties contribute to maternal fatigue, which in turn may influence the use of ineffective coping strategies and increase stress. Thus, the unpredictable demands and changes in behavior create constant concern in the mothers about responding appropriately and restoring the balance, which produces a physical and mental fatigue that increases stress and the frequent application of ineffective strategies to deal with it (). The effects of the behavioral problems and the influence of coping strategies occur in parents of both sexes. Thus, for both fathers and mothers, the severity of the disorder and the behavioral problems have a direct and positive effect on stress, with the sense of coherence and active avoidance coping strategies playing a mediator role in both cases ().
In any case, the comprehension of family adaptation processes when facing difficulties like those involved in raising a child with ASD is a complex issue, as a recent study pointed out. Through a latent profile analysis, four family profiles were identified based on socioeconomic risk, the use of coping strategies, family functioning, social support, and support focused on the family. In a follow-up evaluation 2 years later, the parents in the group characterized by Elevated Disengaged Coping and Limited Social Resources experienced the highest levels of stress and depression, and their children had significantly lower adaptive behavior scores and more behavioral problems than the children in the other three groups. The findings highlight the importance of disengagement and the low availability of social resources for the family in the social development of children with ASD ().
Social support is defined as a multidimensional construct that includes physical and instrumental assistance, attitude transmission, resource and information sharing, and emotional and psychological support. The relationship between the scant social support for mothers of children with autism and stress has been supported in the literature. Low perceived social support, along with high repetitive behavior and low adaptive behavior, is a significant predictor of a greater perceived negative impact of having a child with ASD (). Studies have shown that more than 50% of mothers report a decreased ability to enjoy life as they face the challenges associated with raising a child with ASD. In fact, a low level of social support has been identified as the most powerful predictor of depression and anxiety in the mothers (). Conversely, social support plays an important buffering role against stress, especially for mothers (), with a significant association found between receiving support from the family and social groups and the mothers’ ability to enjoy life (). Higher levels of social support have been associated with lower levels of the negative impact generally produced by rearing a child with ASD, including psychological distress (), negative mood, and depressive symptoms ().
Social support and self-efficacy are mediators of the family’s sense of control over life events and stressors (the hardiness) (). Likewise, parents who experience a higher level of social support also report a higher level of positive mood. Family support is associated with increased optimism, which predicts higher levels of positive maternal outcomes and lower levels of negative maternal outcomes () and facilitates a better emotional relationship with the children (). Different sources of informal social support, including the partner, other family members, and friends, are factors that mediate and moderate maternal well-being, reduce stress, foster engagement (), and predict changes in well-being, above and beyond the impact of the child’s behavioral problems (; ).
In summary, the complexity of parenting stress in families of children with ASD requires a comprehensive approach in order to examine the possible influence of multiple variables simultaneously. Many researchers have investigated the predictors of stress in parents of school-aged children with autism, linking crucial factors such as symptom severity and the child’s behavioral problems, social support, and parents’ coping strategies. The age range and level of cognitive development of the individuals with ASD in the samples have been quite heterogeneous (; ; ; ; ,; , ; ). However, so far, few studies have investigated the predictors of parental stress in school children with ASD without intellectual disability, or “high functioning” (; ; ; ). Moreover, we know of no research to date that has examined the relationship between ASD symptom severity and parenting stress using children’s behavioral problems, coping strategies, and social functional support as possible mediators in this relationship.
The current study is framed within the double ABCX model to examine the factors that influence parenting stress in a Spanish sample of families with a school-age child with autism without ID. The model is flexible and makes it possible to select which components to include. Its main strength is that rather than examining child characteristics, parent resources, and parental stress in an isolated way, it provides an overarching framework that includes each of these fundamental characteristics. In summary, this model enables us to analyze relationships among variables using multiple indicators and increase insight into the role of family resources that influence the family’s vulnerability to stress and its adaptation power.
From this perspective, the investigation had two objectives. The first was to analyze the relationships between parenting stress in families with ASD children without ID and the severity of the ASD symptoms, behavioral difficulties, coping strategies, and social support. The second objective was to investigate the possible mediator role of behavioral difficulties, coping strategies, and social support between ASD symptoms and parenting stress. We hypothesized that parenting stress would be positively correlated with ASD symptom severity, behavioral problems of the children, and coping strategies related to distraction and disengagement. In addition, parenting stress would be negatively correlated with engagement and cognitive reframing coping strategies and social confident and affective functional support. Finally, in a multiple mediation test, behavioral problems and positive coping strategies and social support were expected to emerge as significant mediators on the path between ASD symptom severity and parenting stress.
Materials and Methods
Participants
Participants in this study were 52 families with children with an autism diagnosis. All the families lived in the Valencian community and were recruited through public schools and parental support groups. A member of the team made initial telephone contact with the mothers to explain the objectives of the study and request their collaboration and that of their children.
Most of the children were boys (48), and ages ranged from 7 to 11, with a mean age of 8.59 (SD = 1.38). They had received a clinical diagnosis of an autism spectrum condition in the Psychiatry and Child Neurology services of hospitals and medical centers in the Valencian community at ages ranging between 2 years and 11 months and 6 years (mean age of diagnosis = 4.69; SD = 1.67). The diagnosis was generally made using a multi-team approach, based on the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-5; ), the Autistic Diagnostic Interview—Revised (ADI-R; ), and/or Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule-WPS (ADOS-WPS; ). Children diagnosed with Asperger Syndrome comprised 31 participants of the study, and the remaining diagnoses included Autism Spectrum Disorder (11 children) and Pervasive Developmental Disorder (10 children). In order to confirm the ASD diagnosis years later for the present study, strict cutoff scores were used, as recommended on the Social Communication Questionnaire (SCQ; ) and on the ADI-R () and diagnostic criteria for ASD from the fifth edition of the DSM-5 (), specifically the three criteria from block A on socio-communicative impairments and at least two criteria from block B on repetitive behaviors and restricted interests. Thus, this procedure verified that the children who were evaluated, except two cases, met the cutoff scores required for the diagnosis.
All the children had an intelligence equal to or above 80, measured on the K-BIT intelligence test (), which comprises subtests measuring verbal and non-verbal intelligence. Language development, evaluated with the vocabulary subtest from the WISC-IV (), which is closely related to overall language, also fell within the average range, with a mean of 11.51 (SD = 3.34). The children attended classes in ordinary schools, although they were receiving extra educational support of varying degrees (20 children were enrolled in communication and language classrooms).
In terms of mother and family characteristics, the mothers’ mean age was 40.17 (SD = 4.82). With regard to their education level, 29 had obtained a university degree, 6 had obtained a high school diploma, and 17 had studies corresponding to primary or secondary education. A majority of mothers were employed (33), whereas 9 were unemployed, and 10 exclusively fulfilled the role of housewife. The majority of the mothers were married (78.84%), and the rest were separated/ divorced (19.3%) or single (1.9%).
Demographic data are summarized in Table 1.
Table 1
| Children demographics | M (SD) | Mothers’ demographics | M (SD) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age | 8.59 (1.38) | Age | 40.17 (4.82) |
| IQ | 101.42 (12.65) | Mother’s education | 2.94 (1.33) |
| Vocabulary | 11.51 (3.34) | Primary education N (%) | 15 (28.84) |
| Number of siblings | 0.84 (0.65) | Secondary education N (%) | 2 (3.84) |
| Sex (boys) N (%) | 48 (92.3) | High school N (%) | 6 (11.53) |
| Medication N (%) | 17 (32.7) | University degree N (%) | 29 (55.76) |
| Repeated courses N (%) | 3 (5.76) | Employment status | 0.71 (1.12) |
| Educational support N (%) | 52 (100.0) | Employed N (%) | 33 (63.46) |
| ADI-R A | 13.49 (2.94) | Unemployed N (%) | 19 (36.53) |
| ADI-R B | 8.91 (2.55) | Marital status | 0.40 (0.79) |
| ADI-R C | 4.70 (2.03) | Married N (%) | 41 (78.84) |
| SCQ | 22.51 (7.01) | Other N (%) | 11 (21.15) |
Sociodemographic characteristics of the sample (N = 52).
M, mean; SD, standard deviation; ADI-R, autism diagnostic interview-revised; ADI-R A, qualitative alterations in the reciprocal social interaction; ADI-R B, qualitative alterations in communication; ADI-R C, restrictive and stereotyped behaviors; SCQ, Social Communication Questionnaire.
Measures
Family Demographic Information
In the first interview held with the mothers individually, the family’s most relevant sociodemographic data were collected: demographics (i.e., age, gender, marital status), socio-economic status (i.e., profession, education level, job situation), and family structure variables (i.e., number of children in the family), as well as the child’s characteristics (i.e., age, gender, diagnosis, age when diagnosed, medication, academic performance, support in school).
Measurement of Stress
Parenting Stress Index – Short Form (PSI-SF; ; adapted to Spanish by )
This scale is a self-report measure filled out by the parents. It contains 36 items distributed in three subscales of 12 items each, rated on a five-point Likert-type response scale. The first scale, parental distress, evaluates the distress experienced by parents due to personal factors, such as depression or conflict with a partner, or life restrictions due to the demands of childrearing in their role as parents (i.e., “Since having my child, I feel that I am almost never able to do things I like to do.” The second scale, parent–child dysfunctional interaction, provides information about the parents’ feelings about the interactions with their child and the degree of frustration of the expectations and trust they have placed in their child (i.e., “Most times, I feel that my child does not like me and does not want to be close to me”). The third scale, difficult child, is designed to measure the parents’ perceptions of their child’s self-regulatory abilities (i.e., “My child seems to cry or fuss more often than most children”). The scale also provides a measure of total stress by adding up the scores on the 36 items, with a total score above 90 being clinically significant.
The Cronbach’s alpha internal consistency coefficients in our sample were: parental distress (0.91), dysfunctional parent–child interaction (0.82), and difficult child (0.90), which are similar to those obtained in other studies carried out in Spain (). It is the most widely used instrument to evaluate stress in studies on ASD; in fact, it was utilized in 75% of the studies included in a recent systematic review ().
Coping Measure
Coping Orientation to Problems Experienced (Brief COPE- ; Spanish adaptation by )
This scale focuses on evaluating the coping strategies people use when facing stress. It has 14 subscales and 28 items that are responded to on a four-point Likert-type scale (from 0 to 3), ranging from “I never do this” to “I always do this,” with intermediate scores. In this study, the factorization was used, which groups the coping strategies in four main factors: Factor 1 (engagement), which corresponds closely to the category of problem-focused coping as conceptualized in the stress literature () and includes four subscales (use of instrumental support, active coping, planning, and use of emotional support), all of which reflect the mother’s active involvement in addressing the stressful situation posed by her child’s autism. Factor 2 (distraction) also includes four subscales (self-distraction, humor, self-blame, and venting) reflecting the mother’s efforts to cope with her child’s autism by letting off steam and modulating emotion. Factor 3 (disengagement) includes three subscales (substance use, behavioral disengagement, and denial) involving attempts by the mother to deny or distance herself from the situation. Finally, Factor 4 (cognitive reframing) includes three subscales (acceptance, use of religion, and positive reframing), all of which describe the mother’s efforts to cope with her child’s autism in a positive way through acceptance, cognitive restructuring, and use of religion.
Cronbach’s alpha reliabilities indicate good internal consistency for each of the four coping dimensions, with values ranging from 0.73 (distraction) to 0.86 (engagement) (). In our sample, the Cronbach’s α range between 0.71 (disengagement) and 0.77 (engagement), values similar to those obtained with the Spanish version: 0.74 to 0.80 ().
Social Support Measure
Social Functional Support Questionnaire Duke-UNC (; adaptation to the Spanish population by )
This questionnaire is filled out by parents and rates perceived support through two scales with a total of 11 items, using a five-point Likert-type response scale (from1 point “much less than what I would like” to 5 points “as much as I like”). The confident social support scale has a total of six items that rate the possibility of having people to whom you communicate intimate thoughts (“I have the possibility of talking to someone about my problems at work or at home”). The other scale, affective social support, includes five items designed to evaluate demonstrations of caring and empathy (“I get help with things related to my house”). In this study, the direct scores on both scales were used. Consistent with the results of the Spanish adaptation (), internal consistency (Cronbacht’s α) of the confidential support and affective scales for our sample was 0.83 and 0.74, respectively.
Child Behavioral Problems Measure
Strengths and difficulties questionnaire (SDQ-Cas; ; adapted to the Spanish population by )
The SDQ can be filled out by parents or teachers to rate a wide range of psychopathological symptoms and prosocial behavior in children and adolescents between 4 and 16 years old. It has five scales that rate emotional symptoms (“Often unhappy, depressed or tearful”), behavioral problems (“often fights with other children or bullies them”), relationship problems with peers (“Rather solitary, prefers to play alone”), hyperactivity (“Restless, overactive, cannot stay still for long”), and prosocial behavior (“Considerate of other people’s feelings”). Each of the five scales incorporates 3 response alternatives (not true, somewhat true, very true). In addition, a total score for difficulties can be extracted by adding up the scores on the first four scales. The score on the total difficulties scale can range from 0 to 40 points, with the Spanish version establishing a cutoff for “abnormal” scores at values between 20 and 40 points. The SDQ presents adequate psychometric properties with adequate reliability (0.73) (), confirmed in the Spanish population (0.76) (). In our study, the questionnaire was administered to the parents, and the total score for difficulties was used for the analyses, with a Cronbach’s α = 0.83 for our sample.
Child Autism Symptoms
ASD clinical criteria from the DSM-V ()
The severity of the ASD symptoms was assessed through an interview between the parents and a clinical psychologist, focused on the seven diagnostic criteria for the disorder. The first three were to evaluate socio-communicative impairments, and the other four to rate repetitive behaviors and restricted interests. Through the interviews, the parents evaluated the severity of each criterion using a 4-point Likert scale ranging from 0 to 3, where 0 represents “almost never,” 1 “sometimes,” 2 “often,” and 3 “many times.” Therefore, a higher score on the DSM-V indicates greater severity of the ASD symptoms.
Procedure
This study obtained the approval of the University of Valencia ethics committee for research with humans (Declaration of Helsinki in the Convention of the European Council, 1964). Likewise, the Department of Education of the Valencian Government gave permission to locate the study participants who had previously received a diagnosis of ASD by professionals specialized in children’s public health. After being informed about the objectives, the parents signed the consent forms to participate in the study, and they were fully aware that they could drop out if they so desired. Next, an individual interview session was held with the parents to complete the demographic data, and the ADI-R interview was administered by an accredited psychologist to confirm the diagnosis. In addition, in a later session, one of the members of the team filled out the PSI, SDQ, COPE, and social support questionnaires with the mother, in order to extract the necessary data on their children to carry out this study.
Data Analyses
The statistical analyses were performed with the statistical program for the Social Sciences (SPSS), version 24. Preliminary analyses were conducted to examine the distribution of the variables using the Kolmogorov–Smirnov test; variables that did not show a normal distribution were transformed using square-root transformation.
To examine the relationship between the ASD Symptoms, PSI, SDQ, coping skills, and social support in families with children with ASD, Pearson correlations were calculated. A multiple regression analysis was also carried out to study the impact of the variables on the parenting stress index. Finally, a multiple mediation analysis was performed using the PROCESS program of mediation, moderation, and conditional analysis (), in order to examine the possible mediation of the variables that showed statistical significance with parenting stress: SDQ total difficulties and engagement. This approach uses boot-strapping to estimate the parameters, which is particularly appropriate for small samples. The ASD Symptoms variable was used as the independent variable, the parenting stress index was the dependent variable, and SDQ and engagement were used as mediator variables. In the mediation analyses, the bootstrap procedure with 10,000 repetitions was used to verify the mediator effect of the aforementioned variables, with a confidence interval of 95%. When the indirect effect of the mediators is significantly different from zero, this indirect effect is considered significant.
According to , in order for the model to be acceptable, four assumptions must be met: (a) the predictor variable must be related to the dependent variable; (b) the predictor variable must be related to the mediator; and (c) the mediator variable must be related to the dependent variable after controlling the effect of the predictor variable. The final condition is that the effect of the predictor variable on the dependent variable, controlling the effect of the mediator variable, must not be statistically significant. In the present study, due to the sample size, we followed the recommendations of , designed specifically to obtain reliable and valid conclusions in studies where the sample samples are not large (). These pathways are shown in Figure 1.
FIGURE 1
Results
Relationships Among ASD Symptoms, PSI, SDQ, Coping Skills, and Social Support in Families With Children With ASD
Bivariate correlations between the study variables and parenting stress are shown in Table 2.
Table 2
| M (SD) | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (1) ASD Symptoms | 16.00 (3.13) | - | ||||||||
| (2) PSI_Tot | 93.45 (23.04) | 0.40** | - | |||||||
| (3) SDQ_Tot | 19.63 (6.23) | 0.39** | 0.61** | - | ||||||
| (4) Engagement | 16.80 (3.55) | -0.36** | -0.28* | -0.05 | - | |||||
| (5) Distraction | 7.78 (4.48) | 0.16 | 0.16 | 0.17 | 0.03 | - | ||||
| (6) Disengagement | 1.21 (1.95) | 0.21 | 0.16 | 0.03 | -0.19 | 0.41** | - | |||
| (7) Cognitive Re. | 10.28 (3.10) | -0.25 | -0.25 | -0.18 | 0.23 | 0.03 | -0.15 | - | ||
| (8) Confidant S. | 21.16 (5.47) | -00.45** | -0.28* | -0.31* | 0.48** | 0.13 | -0.09 | 0.01 | - | |
| (9) Affective S. | 17.54 (3.69) | -0.28* | -0.09 | -0.14 | 0.33* | 0.15 | 0.02 | 0.02 | 0.70** | - |
Pearson correlations between ASD symptoms, PSI, SDQ, coping skills, and social support.
ASD Symptoms, autism symptoms; PSI_Tot, Parenting Stress Index total score; SDQ Tot, Strength and Difficulties Questionnaire total score; Cognitive Re., cognitive reframing; S., support. ∗p < 0.05, ∗∗p < 0.01.
Pearson product-moment correlation analyses revealed the existence of significant associations between the ASD symptoms from the DSM 5 and the parenting stress total index (p < 0.001), SDQ (p < 0.001), engagement (p < 0.001), confidant support (p < 0.001), and affective support (p < 0.05). In addition, the analyses revealed significant correlations between the parenting stress total index and the SDQ (p < 0.001), engagement (p = 0.04), and confidant support (p = 0.05).
Multiple regression analysis was carried out in the ASD group in order to evaluate the relationships between the dependent variable of parenting stress and the ASD symptoms, SDQ, engagement, and confidant support as explanatory variables. The results of the regression analysis indicated that the significant predictors that explained the highest percentage of variance in parenting stress were the SDQ (β = 0.56, p < 0.001) and engagement (β = -0.26, p = 0.05). However, confidant support was not a significant predictor of parenting stress (β = 0.06, p = 0.63) (Table 3). It is possible that the communality with the contents evaluated by the instrumental support subscale of engagement would explain the fact that the confident support scale from the Duke-UNC questionnaire did not reach the level of statistical significance in the regression equation.
Table 3
| B | SE | β | p | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PSI_Tot | F(4,44) = 8.60∗; R2 = 0.39 | |||
| ASD Symptoms | 0.60 | 1.0 | 0.09 | 0.52 |
| SDQ_Tot | 2.08 | 0.46 | 0.56 | 0.00∗∗ |
| Engagement | -1.7 | 0.87 | -0.26 | 0.05* |
| Confidant S. | 0.28 | 0.58 | 0.06 | 0.63 |
Multiple regression analysis of ASD symptoms, SDQ, engagement, and confidant support predicting parenting stress in the ASD group.
ASD Symptoms, autism symptoms; PSI_Tot, Parenting Stress Index total score; SDQ_Tot, Strength and Difficulties Questionnaire total score; Confidant S., confidant support. ∗p < 0.05, ∗∗p < 0.01.
The results of the correlations and regression analyses supported the viability of the mediation because the four assumptions were met.
Multiple Mediation Analyses Between ASD Symptoms and the Parenting Stress Index, Controlling for SDQ and Engagement
To examine explanatory mechanisms underlying the significant predictors of PSI and ASD symptoms described above, we tested the role of engagement skills and behavioral and emotional problems as mediators. Multiple mediation analysis, which simultaneously examines multiple indirect effects, potentially extends the comprehension of the causality phenomenon. This analysis identifies indirect effects by controlling for all the other mediators, and it reduces the alpha inflation and investigates several indirect effects simultaneously, rather than in a series of single mediator models ().
Figure 1 shows a multiple mediation model in which the SDQ and engagement mediate the relationship between ASD symptoms and the parenting stress index. As Figure 1 shows, when the direct effect of ASD symptoms on the parenting stress index was evaluated, controlling for the mediator variables, path c’ was not statistically significant (p = 0.48). In addition, the ASD symptoms had a significant direct effect on path α1, CI [0.28, 1.34] and path α2, CI [-0.82, -0.15]. The total effect (c) of the relationship between ASD symptoms and Parenting stress was statistically significant (p = 0.003).
In the next step, the standardized indirect effects in the relationship between ASD symptoms and PSI were calculated to test the possible statistical significance of the two mediators introduced in the model, following the suggestions by . The bootstrapping procedure was used for a sample of 10,000 and a confidence interval (CI) of 95% (Table 4). The results showed that, controlling for the SDQ variable, the value of 0 was not included in the confidence interval, indicating that there was a significant standardized indirect effect, CI [-0.04, 0.44]. Similarly, when the engagement variable was controlled, the results showed a significant standardized indirect effect, CI [0.01, 0.22].
Table 4
| Effect | SE | BootLLCI | BootULCI | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Indirect effects | ||||
| SDQ | 0.23 | 0.10 | 0.042 | 0.444 |
| Engagement | 0.09 | 0.05 | 0.008 | 0.216 |
| SDQ, Engagement | 0.01 | 0.02 | -0.048 | 0.020 |
| Total indirect effect | 0.31 | 0.11 | 0.109 | 0.540 |
| Contrasts | ||||
| SDQ vs. Engagement | 0.14 | 0.12 | -0.082 | 0.377 |
| Engagement vs. SDQ | 0.24 | 0.10 | 0.043 | 0.467 |
Completely standardized indirect effects and contrasts between SDQ and engagement indirect effects on the path from ASD symptoms to PSI mediated b.
Finally, an examination of the pairwise contrast of the indirect effects showed that the engagement variable had a larger effect, CI [0.043, 0.467] than the SDQ, CI [-0.082, 0.377], as Table 4 shows.
Discussion
The present study is framed in the line of research focused on the double ABCX model (). Its principal aim was to integrate characteristics of the child and characteristics of the parents in the analysis of parenting stress in families with a school-age child with autism without ID. In this subgroup, parenting stress and its relationship with risk or protector factors have hardly been studied, in spite of the increase in its prevalence in the past decade ().
The first objective was to identify the relationships among different variables under study, specifically parenting stress and severity of ASD symptoms, behavioral difficulties, coping strategies, and social support. The significant association values found between the different variables were generally in the expected direction. ASD symptoms were positively related to parenting stress, indicating that the increase in the core symptomatology of ASD was related to a sharp increase in maternal distress. The data coincide with previous findings (; ; ), although in other studies, no association was found between the severity of the autism symptoms and parental stress (; ; ). Likewise, the positive relationship between ASD symptoms and behavioral problems was confirmed, as consistently reported in the literature (; ). The ASD symptoms, as expected, were significantly and negatively associated with engagement coping and with the two functional social support scales, confidant support and affective support. This result suggests that mothers who perceive the autism symptoms of their children with greater intensity tend to reduce their problem-focused coping strategies, think they can communicate their intimate feelings to other people less, and receive fewer demonstrations of caring and empathy.
Regarding parenting stress, the correlations generally support our hypotheses about the expected relationships. In addition to being correlated with ASD symptoms, parenting stress presented a positive association with behavioral problems, exceeding the value for the relationship between ASD symptoms and behavioral problems. The results agree with the conclusions of systematic reviews and meta-analyses supporting the important link between parenting stress and EBPs of children with ASD (; ). Moreover, parenting stress showed a significant negative relationship with engagement and confidant support. Therefore, the findings reiterate that positive and problem-focused strategies are associated with less parenting stress (; ; ; ; ; ; ; ), and that social support can also have a buffering effect on the psychological distress produced by raising a child with ASD (), especially for the mothers (). Other negative coping strategies, such as distraction and disengagement, did not reach the level of statistical significance of 0.05 in the relationship with parenting stress, thus playing a much less important role. By contrast, other studies have found that the use of maladaptive coping behaviors was associated with high levels of maternal stress (; ). This incongruence may be due to the fact that the sensitivity of parental coping strategies to Hispanic cultural influences leads to underreporting negative coping strategies that involve the mother’s attempts to deny or distance herself from the situation.
However, the analysis of parenting stress must be considered from a more complex perspective than simple bivariate relationships. These relationships may be modified by a third variable, such as mediator (), which could provide information about how or why two variables are related. In fact, another objective of the present study was to investigate the possible mediator role of behavioral difficulties, engagement, and social support in the link between ASD symptoms and parenting stress. In the previous multiple regression analysis carried out to evaluate the relationships between the dependent variable of parenting stress and these three explanatory variables, confident support (Duke-UNC) did not reach the level of statistical significance in the regression equation, probably because it overlaps with contents that are evaluated more intensively by engagement coping.
Due to the possibility that various mediators could be involved in the relationship between ASD symptoms and parenting stress, it is considered more accurate and parsimonious to include all of them in the same model in order to simultaneously investigate various indirect effects, rather than using a series of single-mediator models (). The results of the multiple mediation model showed that both the behavioral problems (SDQ) and engagement coping mediated the relationship between ASD symptoms and parenting stress. It is evident that the severity of the behavioral problems of the child with ASD, independently of his/her cognitive development, requires extraordinary resources that impede the appropriate response to difficult situations that arise daily, producing stress in the mothers (). Engagement, which includes the use of instrumental support, active coping, planning, and emotional support, all of which reflect the mother’s active involvement in addressing the stressful situation, significantly mediated maternal stress in dealing with the autism symptoms. This tendency is consistent with what was found in other studies in which higher levels of problem-focused coping were generally associated with greater well-being, acting as a buffer when autism symptoms were high ().
Finally, examining the pairwise contrast of the indirect effects, the engagement variable had a larger effect than the child’s behavioral problems. This result supports the magnitude of the role played by positive coping strategies as protector factors against maternal stress. Moreover, its crucial influence can be felt over time. An exceptional longitudinal study showed that the persistent stress experienced by mothers of children with ASD is exacerbated when personal and social resources are insufficient. Mothers who utilized more active coping strategies and relied less on disengaged coping strategies, either at the time of diagnosis or over time, experienced lower levels of parenting stress ().
Limitations and Future Directions
To the best of our knowledge the present study is the first one to explore parenting stress in parents of children with ASD without ID and the potential mediating effects of behavioral problems and coping strategies. Nonetheless, it has various limitations. The sample included a small number of participants, and so the results have to be considered preliminary, and replication studies are needed. Furthermore, the results only apply to children with ASD who have an IQ within normal limits, which may also restrict generalizability. Using a group with ASD and ID would have allowed us to draw firmer and more generalizable conclusions. However, at the same time, the homogeneity of the sample’s intellectual characteristics and age is a strength due to its specificity. Additionally, most of the children were male, and so the results might not be generalizable to girls with ASD. Information was obtained through parent-report questionnaires. These tests are well-validated, but future work should use multi-informant assessments to obtain more ecological measures of the predictor variables.
The informants were mothers because both parents attended the evaluation sessions in only four cases. However, mothers are more often the primary caregivers of children in Spanish culture, and other studies found no differences in the stress levels of fathers and mothers of children with ASD (; ; ). Another potential problem was that the same mothers who rated their child’s EBP evaluated their own stress and coping strategies; consequently, correlations could be inflated by common method effects. In our study, questionnaire data collected from the same source may show relationships for reasons other than a real association between the constructs of interest. Another doubt that arises is whether the aspects of the child’s behavior that the parents consider problematic would coincide with the rating of other significant people, such as the teachers. However, in any case, parent agreement with other informants appears to be moderate for the externalizing and internalizing behavioral problems of children with ASD (), indicating that their perception shares some common variance with that of other informants.
Our study analyses did not consider economic factors, such as income, or the number of family members, which are important variables in evaluating parenting stress. Some data indicate that groups of parents of children with ASD with a greater socioeconomic disadvantage show higher stress and depression levels (; ). A positive point is that our sample was fairly homogeneous on two factors. Most of the mothers had high school level studies or a university degree and one or two children.
Implications
Along with the limitations, the practical aspects of the main findings of this study should be emphasized. A normalized intelligence level of children with autism is not a factor protecting mothers from stress. The mean score on parenting stress of the mothers in our sample exceeded the cutoff score for clinical significance. These high levels of maternal stress also remain stable throughout the key stages from preschool to early high school (), thus impacting parenting behavior.
Eliminating the stressors mothers face in raising children with ASD does not seem possible. Instead, improving parental coping and resilience should be the objective in helping family functioning when there are new and ongoing challenges. Parents must receive help through family-centered supportive services that offer counseling, in order to decrease their stress levels by using appropriate coping strategies and other resources. Brief interventions that include stress management, details about specific behavioral impairments, and principles of behavior management within a set of components (information on autism, strategies for teaching new skills, improving social interaction and communication, service availability, family and community responses to autism) have shown their effectiveness in reducing parenting stress and improving family life (). Furthermore, according to an emerging body of research, mindfulness-based interventions may be helpful in reducing parenting stress in mothers who have children with ASD ().
Statements
Data availability statement
The datasets generated for this study are available on request to the corresponding author.
Author contributions
AnM and AlM designed the research. CB and BR performed the evaluations. CB analyzed the data. AnM, BR, and IB contributed to the final wriring of the manuscript. All authors listed revised the manuscript.
Funding
This research was financed by the Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness (PSI2016-78109; AEI/FEDER, UE) and the pre-doctoral grant from the University of Valencia, UV-INV-PREDOC15-265889.
Acknowledgments
We would like to thank the children, parents, and teachers who participated in this study.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
References
1
AbidinR. R. (1995). Parenting Stress Index: Professional Manual, 3rd Edn. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
2
Al-KandariS.AlsalemA.AbohalmedS.Al-OrfF.Al-ZoubiM.Al-SabahR.et al (2017). Brief report: social support and coping strategies of mothers of children suffering from ASD in Kuwait.J. Autism Dev. Disord.473311–3319. 10.1007/s10803-017-3225-y
3
American Psychiatric Association (2013). Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders: (DSM-V), 5th Edn. Arlington, VA: American Psychiatric Publishing. 10.1176/appi.books.9780890425596
4
BaioJ.WigginsL.ChristensenD. L.MaennerM. J.DanielsJ.WarrensZ.et al (2018). Prevalence of autism spectrum disorder among children aged 8 years. Autism and developmental disabilities monitoring network, 11 Sites, United States, 2014.Surveill. Summa.671–23. 10.15585/mmwr.ss6706a1
5
BaronR. M.KennyD. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychology research: conceptual, strategic and statistical considerations.J. Pers. Soc. Psychol.511173–1182. 10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173
6
BarrosoN. E.MendezL.GrazianoP. A.BagnerD. M. (2018). Parenting stress through the lens of different clinical groups: a systematic review & meta-analysis.J. Abnorm. Child Psychol.46449–461. 10.1007/s10802-017-0313-6
7
BaumingerN.SolomonM.RogersS. J. (2010). Externalizing and internalizing behaviors in ASD.Autism Res.3101–112. 10.1002/aur.131
8
Bellón SaameñoJ. A.Delgado SánchezA.Luna del CastilloJ. D.Lardelli ClaretP. (1996). Validez y fiabilidad del cuestionario de apoyo social funcional Duke-UNC-11.Aten. Prim.18153–163.
9
Ben-SassonA.SotoT. W.Martinez-PedrazaF.CarterA. S. (2013). Early sensory over responsivity in toddlers with autism spectrum disorder as a predictor of family impairment and parenting stress.J. Child Psychol. Psychol.54846–853. 10.1111/jcpp.12035
10
BensonP. R. (2010). Coping, distress, and well-being in mothers of children with autism.Res. Autism Spectr. Dis.4217–228. 10.1016/j.rasd.2009.09.008
11
BensonP. R.KarlofK. L. (2009). Anger, stress proliferation, and depressed mood among parents of children with ASD: a longitudinal replication.J. Autism Dev. Disord.39350–362. 10.1007/s10803-008-0632-0
12
BishopS. L.RichlerJ.CainA. C.LordC. (2007). Predictors of perceived negative impact in mothers of children with autism spectrum disorder.Am. J. Ment. Retard.112450–461. 10.1352/0895-8017(2007)112[450:POPNII]2.0.CO;2
13
BitsikaV.SharpleyC. F. (2017). The association between autism spectrum disorder symptoms in high-functioning male adolescent and their mothert’s anxiety and depression.J. Dev. Phys. Disabil.9461–473. 10.1007/s10882-017-9537-1
14
BoydB. A. (2002). Examining the relationship between stress and lack of social support in mothers of children with autism.Focus Autism Dev. Dis.17208–215. 10.1177/10883576020170040301
15
BroadheadW. E.GehlbachS. H.de GruyF. V.KaplanB. (1988). Duke-UNC functional social support questionnaire: measurement of social support in family medicine patients.Med. Care26709–723. 10.1097/00005650-198807000-00006
16
BundyM. B.KunceL. J. (2009). Parenting stress and high functioning children with autism.Int. J. Disabil. Hum. Dev.8401–410. 10.1515/ijdhd.2009.8.4.401
17
CarverC. S. (1997). You want to measure coping but your protocol’s too long: consider the Brief COPE.Int. J. Behav. Med.492–100. 10.1207/s15327558ijbm0401_6
18
ConnerC. M.WhiteS. W. (2014). Stress n mothers of children with autism: trait mindfulness as a protective factor.Res. Autism Spectr. Dis.8617–624. 10.1016/j.rasd.2014.02.001
19
CraigF.OpertoF. F.De GiacomoA.MargariL.FrolliA.ConsonM.et al (2016). Parenting stress among parents of children with neurodevelopmental disorders.Psych. Res.242121–129. 10.1016/j.psychres.2016.05.016
20
DavisN. O.CarterA. S. (2008). Parenting stress in mothers and fathers of toddlers with autism spectrum disorders: associations with child characteristics.J. Autism Dev. Disord.381278–1291. 10.1007/s10803-007-0512-z
21
Diaz-HerreroA.Lopez-PinaJ. A.Perez-LopezJ.de la NuezA. G.Martinez-FuentesM. T. (2011). Validity of the parenting stress index-short form in a sample of spanish fathers.Span. J. Psychol.14990–997. 10.5209/rev_SJOP.2011.v14.n2.44
22
Díaz-HerreroA. G.Brito de la NuezA.López PinaJ. A.Pérez-LópezJ.Martínez-FuentesM. T. (2010). Estructura factorial y consistencia interna de la versión española del parenting stress index- short form.Psicothema221033–1038.
23
DunnM. E.BurbineT.BowersC. A.Tantleff-DunnS. (2001). Moderators of stress in parents of children with autism.Commun. Ment. Health J.3739–52. 10.1023/A:1026592305436
24
EkasN. V.LickenbrockD. M.WhitmanT. L. (2010). Optimism, social support and well-being in mothers of children with autism spectrum disorders.J. Autism Dev. Disord.401274–1284. 10.1007/s10803-010-0986-y
25
EstesA.MunsonJ.DawsonG.KoehlerE.ZhouX.AbbotR. (2009). Parenting stress and psychological functioning among mothers of preschool children with autism and developmental delay.Autism13375–387. 10.1177/1362361309105658
26
FolkmanS.LazarusR. S. (1988). Manual for the Ways of Coping Scale.Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
27
GiovagnoliG.PostorinoV.FattaL. M.SangesV.De PeppoL.VassenaL.et al (2015). Behavioral and emotional profile and parental stress in preschool children with autism spectrum disorder.Res. Dev. Disabil.45-46411–421. 10.1016/j.ridd.2015.08.006
28
GoodmanR. (1997). The strengths and difficulties questionnaire: a research note.J. Child Psychol. Psychiatry.38581–586. 10.1111/j.1469-7610.1997.tb01545.x
29
GoodmanR. (2001). Psychometric properties of the strengths and difficulties questionnaire.J. Am. Acad. Child Adolesc. Psychiatry.401337–1345. 10.1097/00004583-200111000-00015
30
GuptaV. B. (2007). Comparison of parenting stress in different developmental disabilities.J. Dev. Phys. Disabil.19417–425. 10.1007/s10882-007-9060-x
31
HastingsR. P. (2002). Parental stress and behaviour problems of children with developmental disability.J. Intellect. Dev. Disabil.27149–160. 10.1080/1366825021000008657
32
HastingsR. P.KovshoffH.BrownT.WardN. J.EspinozaF. D.RemingtonB. (2005a). Coping strategies in mothers and fathers of preschool and school-age children with autism.Autism9377–391. 10.1007/s10803-005-0007-8
33
HastingsR. P.KovshoffH.WardN. J.EspinosaF.BrownT.RemingtonB. (2005b). Systems analysis of stress and positive perceptions in mothers and fathers of pre-school children with autism.J. Autism Dev. Disord.35635–644.
34
HayesA. F. (2013). Introduction to Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional Process Analysis: A Regression-Based Approach.New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
35
HayesA. F.RockwoodN. J. (2017). Regression-based statistical mediation and moderation analysis in clinical research: observations, recommendations, and implementation.Behav. Res. Ther.9839–57. 10.1016/j.brat.2016.11.001
36
HayesS. A.WatsonS. L. (2013). The impact of parenting stress: a meta-analysis of studies comparing the experience of parenting stress in parents of children with and without autism spectrum disorder.J. Autism Dev. Disord.43629–642. 10.1007/s10803-012-1604-y
37
HellandW. A.HellandT. (2017). Emotional and behavioral needs impairment in children with specific language disorder in children with autism spectrum: the importance of pragmatic language impairment.Res. Dev. Disabil.7033–39. 10.1016/j.ridd.2017.08.009
38
HoffmanC. D.SweeneyD. P.HodgeD.Lopez-WagnerM.LooneyL. (2009). Parenting stress and closeness: mothers of typically developing children and mothers of children with autism.Focus Autism Dev. Disabil.24178–187. 10.1177/1088357609338715
39
KasariC.GulsrudA.PaparellaT.HellemannG.BerryK. (2015). Randomized comparative efficacy study of parent-mediated interventions for toddlers with autism.J. Consult. Clin. Psychol.83554–563. 10.1037/a0039080
40
KaufmanA. S.KaufmanN. I. (2000). K-BIT, Test Breve de Inteligencia de Kauffman (Kaufman Brief Intelligence Test).Madrid: Pearson.
41
KiamiS. R.GoodgoldS. (2017). Support needs coping strategies as predictors of stress level among mothers of children with autism spectrum disorder.Autism Res. Treat.2017:8685950. 10.1155/2017/8685950
42
LaiW. W.GohT. J.OeiT. P. S.SungM. (2015). Coping and well-being in parents of children with autism spectrum disorders (ASD).J. Autism Dev. Disord.452582–2593. 10.1007/s10803-015-2430-9
43
LazarusR. S.FolkmanS. (1984). Stress, Appraisal and Coping.New York, NY: Springer.
44
LecavalierL.LeoneS.WiltzJ. (2006). The impact of behavior problems of caregiver stress in Young people with autism spectrum disorders.J. Intell. Disabil. Res.50172–183. 10.1111/j.1365-2788.2005.00732.x
45
LeeG. K.LopataC.VolkerM. A.ThomeerM. L.NidaR. E.ToomeyJ. A.et al (2009). Health-related quality of life of parents of children with high-functioning autism spectrum disorders.Focus Autism Dev. Dis.24227–239. 10.1177/1088357609347371
46
LindseyR. A.BarryT. D. (2018). Protective factors againts distress for caregivers of a child with autism spectrum disorder.J. Autism Dev. Disord.481092–1107. 10.1007/s10803-017-3372-1
47
LordC.RutterM.DiLavoreP. C.RisiS.GothamK.BishopS. L.et al (2000). ADOS. Escala de Observación Para el Diagnóstico del Autismo.Madrid: TEA Ediciones.
48
MacKinnonD. P.LockwoodC. M.WilliamsJ. (2004). Confidence limits for the indirect effect: distribution of the product and resampling methods.Multivar. Behav. Res.3999–128. 10.1207/s15327906mbr3901_4
49
ManningM. M.WainwrightL.BennettJ. (2011). The doublé ABCX model of adaptation in racially diverse families with a school-age child with autism.J. Autism Dev. Disord.41320–331. 10.1007/s10803-010-1056-1
50
McCubbinH. I.PattersonJ. M. (1983). The family stress process: the double ABCX model of adjustment and adaptation.Marriage Fam. Rev.67–37. 10.1300/J002v06n01_02
51
McStayR.TremblathD.DissanakayeC. (2014). Maternal stress and quality of life in response to raising a child with autism: from preschool to adolescence.Res. Dev. Disabil.353119–3130. 10.1016/j.ridd.2014.07.043
52
Morales-HidalgoP.Roigé-CastellvíJ.Hernández-MartínezC.VoltasN.CanalsJ. (2018). Prevalence and characteristics of autism spectrum disorder among spanish school-age children.J. Autism Dev. Disord.483176–3190. 10.1007/s10803-018-3581-2
53
MoránC.LanderoR.GonzálezM. T. (2010). COPE-28: un análisis psicométrico de la versión en español del Brief COPE.Univ. Psychol.9543–552.
54
MoriK.UjiieT.SmithA.HowlinP. (2009). Parental stress associated with caring for children with Asperger’s syndrome or autism.Pediatr. Int.51364–370. 10.1111/j.1442-200X.2008.02728.x
55
ObeidR.DaouN. (2014). The effects of coping style, social support, and behavioral problems on the well-being of mothers of children with autism spectrum disorders in Lebanon.Res. Autism Spectr. Dis.1059–70. 10.1016/j.rasd.2014.11.003
56
Pastor-CerezuelaG.Fernández-AndrésM. I.Tárraga-MínguezR.Navarro-PeñaJ. M. (2016). Parental stress and ASD. Relationship with autism symptom severity, IQ, and resilience.Focus Autism Dev. Dis.31300–311. 10.1177/1088357615583471
57
PosserudM.HysingM.HellandW. A.GillbergC.LundervoldA. J. (2018). Autism traits: the importance of co-morbid problems for impairment and contact with services. Data from the Bergen child study.Res. Dev. Disabil.72275–283. 10.1016/j.ridd.2016.01.002
58
PozoP.SarriáE. (2014a). A global model of stress in parents of children with autism spectrum disorders (ASD).An. Psicol.30180–191. 10.6018/analesps.30.1.140722
59
PozoP.SarriáE. (2014b). Prediction of stress in mothers of children with autism spectrum disorders.Span. J. Psychol.17:E6. 10.1017/sjp.2014.6
60
PreacherK. J.HayesA. F. (2004). SPSS and SAS procedures for estimating indirect effects in simple mediation models.Behav. Res. Methods Instrum. Comput.36717–731. 10.3758/BF03206553
61
PreacherK. J.HayesA. F. (2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models.Behav. Res. Methods40879–891. 10.3758/BRM.40.3.879
62
RaoP. A.BeidelD. L. (2009). The impact of children with high-functioning autism on parental stress, sibling adjustment and family functioning.Behav. Modif.33437–451. 10.1177/0145445509336427
63
Rodríguez-HernándezP. J.BetancortM.Ramírez-SantanaG. M.GarcíaR.Sanz-ÁlvarezE. J.De las CuevasC. (2012). Psychometric properties of the parent and teacher versions of the strength and difficulties questionnaire (SDQ) in a spanish sample.Int. J. Clin. Health Psychol.12265–279.
64
RutterM.BaileyA.LordC. (2003). SCQ. The Social Communication Questionnaire.Torrance, CA: Western Psychological Services.
65
RutterM.Le CouteurA.LordC. (2006). ADI-R. Entrevista Clínica Para el Diagnóstico del Autismo-Revisada.Madrid: TEA Ediciones.
66
SeymourM.WoodC.GialloR.JelletR. (2013). Fatigue, stress and coping in mothers of children with an autism spectrum disorder.J. Autism Dev. Disord.431547–1554. 10.1007/s10803-012-1701-y
67
SharabiA.Marom-GolanD. (2018). Social support, education levels, and parents’ involvement: a comparison between mothers and fathers of young children with autism spectrum disorder.Top. Early Child. Spec. Educ.3854–64. 10.1177/0271121418762511
68
SivbergB. (2002). Family system and coping behaviors: a comparison between parents of children with autistic spectrum disorders and parents with non-autistic children.Autism6397–409. 10.1177/1362361302006004006
69
SmithL. E.GreenbergJ. S.SeltzerM. M. (2012). Social support and well-being at mid-life among mothers of adolescents and adults with autism spectrum disorders.J. Autism Dev. Disord.421818–1826. 10.1007/s10803-011-1420-9
70
SmithL. E.SeltzerM. M.Tager-FlusbergH.GreenbergJ. S.CarterA. S. (2008). A comparative analysis of well-being and coping among mothers of toddlers and mothers of adolescents with ASD.J. Autism Dev. Disord.38876–889. 10.1007/s10803-007-0461-6
71
StanojevićN.NenadovićV.FatićS.StokićM. (2017). Exploring factors of stress level in parents of children with autistic spectrum disorder.Specijalna edukacija i rehabilitacija16445–463. 10.5937/specedreh16-13861
72
StrangJ. F.KenworthyL.DaniolosP.CaseL.WillsM. C.MartinA.et al (2012). Depression and anxiety symptoms in children and adolescents with autism spectrum disorders without intellectual disability.Res. Autism Spectr. Disord.6406–412. 10.1016/j.rasd.2011.06.015
73
StratisE. A.LecavalierL. (2015). Informant agreement for youth with autism spectrum disorder or intellectual disability: a meta-analysis.J. Autism Dev. Disord.451026–1041. 10.1007/s10803-014-2258-8
74
TomenyT. S. (2017). Parenting stress as an indirect pathway to mental health concerns among mothers of children with autism spectrum disorder.Autism21907–911. 10.1177/1362361316655322
75
WatsonS. L.CoonsK. D.HayesS. A. (2013). Autism spectrum disorder and fetal alcohol spectrum disorder. Part I: a comparison of parenting stress.J. Intellect. Dev. Dis.3895–104. 10.3109/13668250.2013.788136
76
WechslerD. (2003). Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children (WISC-IV), 4th Edn. San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation.
77
WeissJ. A.CappadociaM. C.MacMullinJ. A.VieciliM.LunskyY. (2012). The impact of child problem behaviors of children with ASD on parent mental health: the mediating role of acceptance and empowerment.Autism16261–274. 10.1177/1362361311422708
78
YorkeE.PippaW.WestonA.RaflaM.CharmanT.SimonoffE. (2018). The association between emotional and behavioral problems in children with autism spectrum disorder and psychological distress in their parents: a systematic review and meta-analysis.J. Autism Dev. Disord.483393–3415. 10.1007/s10803-018-3605-y
79
Zaidman-ZaitA.MirendaP.DukeE.SzatmariP.GeorgiadesS.VoldenJ.et al (2014). Examination of bidirectional relationships between parent stress and two types of problem behavior in children with autism spectrum disorder.J. Autism Dev. Disord.441908–1917. 10.1007/s10803-014-2064-3
80
Zaidman-ZaitA.MirendaP.DukuE.VaillancourtT.SmithI. M.SzatmariP.et al (2017). Impact of personal and social resources on parenting stress in mothers of children with autism spectrum disorder.Autism21155–166. 10.1177/1362361316633033
81
Zaidman-ZaitA.MirendaP.SzatmariP.DukuE.SmithI. M.VaillancourtT.et al (2018). Profiles of social and coping resources in families of children with autism spectrum disorder: relations to parent and child outcomes.J. Autism Dev. Disord.482064–2076. 10.1007/s10803-018-3467-3
Summary
Keywords
parental stress, social support, coping strategies, ASD, mediation analysis
Citation
Miranda A, Mira A, Berenguer C, Rosello B and Baixauli I (2019) Parenting Stress in Mothers of Children With Autism Without Intellectual Disability. Mediation of Behavioral Problems and Coping Strategies. Front. Psychol. 10:464. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00464
Received
20 November 2018
Accepted
15 February 2019
Published
08 March 2019
Volume
10 - 2019
Edited by
Purificacion Checa, Universidad de Granada, Spain
Reviewed by
Gonzalo Arrondo, University of Navarra, Spain; Javier Fenollar Cortés, Universidad Loyola Andalucía, Spain; Weidi Wang, Shanghai Mental Health Center (SMHC), China
Updates
Copyright
© 2019 Miranda, Mira, Berenguer, Rosello and Baixauli.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Ana Miranda, ana.miranda@uv.es
This article was submitted to Educational Psychology, a section of the journal Frontiers in Psychology
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.