In the original article, there was a mistake in Table 1 as published. Autonomy support ratings for employees across the three time points were missing. There were also some minor formatting errors that have been corrected. The corrected Table 1 appears below.
Table 1
| T1 (Baseline) | T2 | T3 | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control | Experimental | Control | Experimental | Control | Experimental | |||||||
| M | SD | M | SD | M | SD | M | SD | M | SD | M | SD | |
| Managers | ||||||||||||
| Age | 45.06 | 7.25 | 42.50 | 9.21 | ||||||||
| Tenure as manager | 5.53 | 8.84 | 6.45 | 6.58 | ||||||||
| Number of employees | 24.29 | 11.88 | 24.2 | 10.31 | ||||||||
| Autonomy support* | 4.19 | 0.50 | 3.85 | 0.36 | 4.17 | 0.49 | 3.75 | 0.45 | 4.08 | 0.51 | 3.86 | 0.30 |
| Competence support | 3.57 | 0.53 | 3.54 | 0.40 | 3.67 | 0.54 | 3.50 | 0.35 | 3.61 | 0.49 | 3.65 | 0.35 |
| Relatedness support | 4.31 | 0.55 | 4.18 | 0.43 | 4.15 | 0.50 | 4.04 | 0.34 | 4.23 | 0.49 | 4.05 | 0.36 |
| Employees | ||||||||||||
| Age | 44.59 | 11.37 | 43.99 | 11.90 | ||||||||
| Tenure | 9.61 | 8.74 | 9.45 | 8.33 | ||||||||
| Years with manager* | 0.52 | 0.67 | 1.01 | 0.84 | ||||||||
| Autonomy support | 3.72 | 0.87 | 3.85 | 0.82 | 3.80 | 0.79 | 3.85 | 0.84 | 3.79 | 0.81 | 3.84 | 0.78 |
| Competence support | 3.50 | 0.88 | 3.64 | 0.83 | 3.50 | 0.91 | 3.65 | 0.88 | 3.54 | 0.90 | 3.62 | 0.89 |
| Relatedness support | 3.97 | 0.85 | 4.09 | 0.83 | 3.99 | 0.83 | 4.06 | 0.84 | 3.98 | 0.84 | 4.00 | 0.86 |
| Autonomy* | 3.88 | 0.56 | 3.76 | 0.67 | 3.79 | 0.60 | 3.75 | 0.66 | 3.83 | 0.59 | 3.74 | 0.56 |
| Competence | 4.15 | 0.51 | 4.19 | 0.54 | 4.12 | 0.60 | 4.09 | 0.60 | 4.03 | 0.49 | 4.15 | 0.58 |
| Relatedness | 4.18 | 0.71 | 4.03 | 0.72 | 4.12 | 0.73 | 4.00 | 0.72 | 4.04 | 0.68 | 4.02 | 0.67 |
| Job satisfaction | 2.82 | 0.56 | 2.75 | 0.55 | 2.81 | 0.53 | 2.75 | 0.57 | 2.81 | 0.57 | 2.73 | 0.58 |
| Vigor | 4.50 | 1.00 | 4.33 | 1.09 | 4.39 | 1.13 | 4.19 | 1.20 | 4.39 | 1.07 | 4.19 | 1.18 |
| Burnout | 2.35 | 0.76 | 2.34 | 0.74 | 2.41 | 0.86 | 2.41 | 0.82 | 2.32 | 0.81 | 2.37 | 0.79 |
| Work performance | 7.77 | 1.35 | 7.68 | 1.41 | 7.52 | 1.48 | 7.47 | 1.75 | 7.53 | 1.57 | 7.58 | 1.54 |
Characteristics of participants at baseline and descriptive statistics of the study variables.
Statistically significant difference between the control and experimental group at T1 (p <0.05).
The authors apologize for these errors and state that this does not change the scientific conclusions of the article in any way. The original article has been updated.
Summary
Keywords
basic psychological needs theory, leadership training, self-determination theory, need support, quasi-experimental design, focus group interviews
Citation
Tafvelin S, von Thiele Schwarz U and Stenling A (2020) Corrigendum: Leadership Training to Increase Need Satisfaction at Work: A Quasi-Experimental Mixed Method Study. Front. Psychol. 11:937. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00937
Received
10 February 2020
Accepted
15 April 2020
Published
05 May 2020
Volume
11 - 2020
Edited and reviewed by
Con Stough, Swinburne University of Technology, Australia
Updates
Copyright
© 2020 Tafvelin, von Thiele Schwarz and Stenling.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Susanne Tafvelin susanne.tafvelin@umu.se
This article was submitted to Organizational Psychology, a section of the journal Frontiers in Psychology
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.