Abstract
This study aimed to explore the mediating effects of internet gaming disorder, social network use, and generalized pathological internet use (GPIU) on the association between loneliness and depression. A total of 2211 junior high school students completed questionnaires regarding loneliness, internet gaming disorder, social network use, GPIU, and depression (aged 10–16 years). The results of a structural equation model revealed that (a) the path coefficient of loneliness to depression was significantly positive, (b) loneliness could not predict depression through GPIU directly, but (c) loneliness could predict depression through internet gaming disorder to GPIU, (d) loneliness could predict depression through social network use to GPIU, and (e) loneliness could not predict depression through internet gaming disorder to social network use to GPIU. These results provided significant implications for the prevention and reduction of depression in Chinese junior high school students.
Introduction
Junior high school students are faced with such problems as high academic pressure and monotonous life, which may easily lead to loneliness, depression, and other mental health problems (; Zhang, 2000; Xu, 2012). In recent years, many studies have proved that depression is a mental illness with high prevalence, high chronic recurrence rate, high disease burden, and high suicide mortality (), and there was a high correlation between loneliness and depression (Ren et al., 2020). Studies have demonstrated that adolescents with generalized pathological internet use (GPIU) usually suffer from loneliness (Sukenick, 2012) and depression (Zou et al., 2007). A number of studies have focused on the research of internet gaming disorder and social networking disorder (; Wartberg et al., 2020). This study aims at studying the mediating effects of internet gaming disorder, social network use, and GPIU on the association between loneliness and depression.
Depression
World Health Organization research worldwide shows that depression is affecting physical and mental health in the 21st century (). From a psychological point of view, depression is the consequence of an ineffective response to life stress, and emotional disorders are the core characteristic, including worthlessness, helplessness and despair, and decreased levels of physical activity (). Depression affects emotions as well as thinking, motivation, attention, imagination, behavior, social relationships, and physical conditions, resulting in people feeling lonely and unwell (; ). Junior high school students are in a critical period of physical and mental development and social maturity (Zhang, 2017). The contradiction between ideal and reality often leads to negative emotions, mainly manifested by depression and anxiety, which hinders the healthy development of junior high school students’ mental and physical development (). Studies have shown that adolescents’ depressive symptoms increase significantly in frequency and generality (; Yang et al., 2010; ). Many factors affect depression, including both external risk factors and individual susceptibility (Tao, 2006).
Loneliness and Depression
Clinical and related statistics have demonstrated that loneliness is a common issue of modern people (; ). Adolescence is a particularly vulnerable stage for experiencing feelings of loneliness, which is a significant factor for adolescent health and quality of life (; ). pointed that loneliness occurred when a person’s social network made him/her less satisfied than he/she expected. Some authors have reported that when social quality declines, the original network of relationships (loss or loss of loved ones, relocation) or lack of social skills (personality factors) could lead to strong loneliness (Vazquez and Garcia, 1997; Teunisse et al., 1999; Tijhuis et al., 1999; ; Van et al., 2017). Hence, loneliness is a subjective feeling of unpleasant suffering caused by social defects (), and long-term or severe loneliness may trigger certain emotional disorders and reduce mental health ().
Studies found that there was a high correlation between loneliness and depression (; ; Ren et al., 2020). On the one hand, among the negative effects of depression, loneliness is the most common (). When individuals have negative emotions such as anxiety, pessimism, and disappointment, they tend to experience more feelings of loneliness, loss of help, and desire to be understood. However, on the other hand, loneliness is very detrimental to mental health; a high level of the feeling of loneliness is thought to stimulate depressive symptoms (Wei et al., 2005; ). found that the interactive effect of loneliness at 5 and 9 years old predicted depressive symptoms at age 13. published a recent 5-year longitudinal study that found that loneliness predicted an increase in depressive symptoms at yearly intervals, while depressive symptoms did not predict an increase in loneliness at the same time. A longitudinal study also found a gender-dependent impact of loneliness on depressive symptoms. For females, loneliness could significantly predict the increased depressive symptoms, while for males, loneliness could not (). Therefore, our study will focus on the relationship between loneliness and depression. Based on the above literature discussion, we proposed the following Hypothesis 1: Loneliness could positively predict depression.
Mediating Roles of GPIU
Pathological internet use (PIU) refers to a phenomenon of obvious social and psychological damage caused by excessive use of the internet, which means people are unable to control their internet usage (; Starcevic et al., 2018). Based on the literature, proposed a cognitive behavioral model of PIU, which highlighted the important role of maladaptive cognition in the development of PIU. The cognitive–behavioral model provided a theoretical explanation for the origin and pathogenesis of GPIU and specific pathological internet use (SPIU) in identifying the etiology of PIU. proposed two types of PIU (Figure 1): SPIU and GPIU. SPIU is a reliance on the special features of the internet, such as internet gaming disorder and social networks use; GPIU refers to the global set of online behaviors, which contains general, multifaceted internet overuse that perhaps includes no clear destination killing time online (). believed that psychopathology was the distal necessary cause of GPIU/SPIU symptoms. The underlying psychopathology itself did not cause the symptoms of GPIU/SPIU, but it was a necessary factor in its etiology. The key factor in the occurrence of GPIU/SPIU was maladaptive cognition, which was its proximal and sufficient reason.
FIGURE 1
Generalized pathological internet use, characterized by excessive or compulsive internet use and a preoccupation with and loss of control over this use, results in negative personal, professional consequences (; ), and may be detrimental (). Studies found that adolescents with GPIU usually suffered from loneliness (Young and Rogers, 1998; ; Sukenick, 2012), depression (; Zou et al., 2007), shyness (), poor interpersonal relationships (Sanders et al., 2000; ), cognitive distortion (), and other decreases in well-being (). According to the cognitive behavioral model (), pre-existing psychosocial problems (depression, or low levels of social support) predispose an individual to GPIU cognitions, behaviors, and negative outcomes. Therefore, investigating the detailed relationships of these variables and GPIU is necessary.
Internet addiction was positively associated with loneliness and depression (; Young and Rogers, 1998; ; ; ; Young and Kimberly, 2007; ). Loneliness is more common among internet addicts (), and loneliness in children and adolescents is one of the predictors of internet addiction (). Tian et al. (2017) found that the association between loneliness and GPIU was dynamic and bidirectional, and found that loneliness could predicted GPIU. Then, noted that loneliness was a significant predictor of internet addiction among college students at ages 17–31. In addition, a study found that teenagers in an internet addiction group had more experiences of online anxiety and depression (; Zou et al., 2007). pointed that if individuals could reduce their internet addiction, they would be able to reduce their depression level. Studies applying longitudinal designs pointed that the GPIU caused depression (Regina et al., 2011), and found that use of the internet tended to increase depression by a longitudinal study. Hence, we will focus on the mediating roles of GPIU between loneliness and depression. So, we proposed Hypothesis 2: Loneliness could predict depression through GPIU.
Mediating Role of Internet Gaming Disorder and Social Network Use Between Loneliness and GPIU
To improve prevention and intervention of GPIU, its inner working process must be explored, such as an investigation of the intermediary mechanism, which helps to explain how loneliness affects GPIU. The internet gaming disorder and problematic use of social networks belong to SPIU. Young and Kimberly (1998, 2007) conducted a series of studies on the behavioral characteristics of internet addicts. The results suggest that internet addicts tend to prefer online chat and online interactive games. Therefore, Young and Rogers (1998) posited that the internet was not addictive, but special network applications contributed to the occurrence of internet addiction. research emphasized that the internet was very important for today’s youth and that computer games and the internet communication may lead to social isolation by replacing friends of children or young people. Also, more internet-addicted students indulge in new and exciting online games and two-way interactive online chat (Yao and Yang, 2014; Zhang and Lei, 2015). In recent years, a number of studies have proposed that the concept of internet addiction lacks specificity and focused on the research of internet gaming disorder and social networking disorder (; Wartberg et al., 2020).
First, we proposed social network use as a mediator between loneliness and GPIU. found that individuals with high loneliness were more likely to seek social satisfaction on the network to compensate for social deficiencies in real life. also found individuals’ loneliness experience was an important psychological factor that affected interpersonal communication, and individuals with high loneliness and social anxiety often cannot establish stable interpersonal relationships in real life and often search for alternatives through the network. also found that individuals with high loneliness used mobile social networks more often than individuals with low loneliness. In addition, some studies have asserted that online social networking can reduce more social cues and less direct evaluation by others than offline social networking. People prefer to self-present through social networks, establish and maintain their positive image, and reduce and avoid the level of anxiety that exists in real life (). Thus, teenagers with loneliness are more likely to choose online socializing, which is manifested as pathological social network use.
Another mediator variable is internet gaming disorder. Internet games are a new form of entertainment combining traditional games with the internet, which have strong interactivity and virtuality, and will lead to many behavioral problems among teenagers (), such as tired of school, truancy, dropping out of school, and even cybercrime. The emotional deficiency of lonely individuals in real life can be satisfied through social activities and emotional communication through games in the virtual world (), which will make lonely people spend more time on online games, and leads to internet gaming disorder. pointed that loneliness, self-esteem, and life satisfaction were affirmed to account for 38% of the total variance in internet gaming addiction, and loneliness was the most important variable predicting internet addiction. also proposed the relationship between loneliness and online game addiction. So, we presented Hypothesis 3: Loneliness could predict depression through social network use to GPIU; and Hypothesis 4: Loneliness could predict depression through internet gaming disorder to GPIU.
What is more, at present, more and more people use internet games to socialize online, but there are few relevant studies. Therefore, this study will also explore the chain mediating effect of internet gaming disorder to social network use in loneliness to GPIU. So, we further put forward Hypothesis 5: Loneliness could predict depression through internet gaming disorder to social network use to GPIU.
Materials and Methods
This study conformed to the code of ethics of the World Medical Association (Declaration of Helsinki) for experiments involving humans and was approved by the Ethics Committee of Shandong Normal University. Additionally, our research obtained written informed consent from the parents of the participants.
Participants
The participants were from a junior high school in Eastern China, which is an ordinary school and whose students are representative. Students in the first through third grades were included. After eliminating incomplete and repetitive questionnaires, a total of 2211 valid questionnaires were received. Overall, 1087 (49.2%) participants were male and 1124 (50.8%) were female. Their mean age was 13.04 years (aged 10–16 years, M = 13.04, SD = 1.226).
Procedures
We obtained informed consent from the school administrators and students before data collection. The paper questionnaire in Chinese was used in this study. To maintain the quality of the investigation, the junior high school students were gathered in a large assembly room to complete their questionnaires with the help of two researchers. The other grades finished the questionnaires with the help of two researchers during one full class period of 45 min.
Measures
UCLA Loneliness Scale
The UCLA Loneliness Scale comprises 20 items, for example, “I am unhappy doing so many things alone.” The items were rated on a four-point scale for frequency (1 = often to 4 = never). The final score was calculated by the total score of all the items, and higher scores indicated greater levels of loneliness. We also conducted CFA, with χ2/df = 3.846, RMSEA = 0.023, and CFI = 0.993. Cronbach’s alpha for the UCLA Loneliness Scale was 0.855.
Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D)
The CES-D Scale was used to measure the students’ depression, which was adapted to the Chinese language and culture and comprised 20 items, for example, “I felt that I could not shake off the blues even with help from my family or friends.” The students rated each item on a four-point scale from 1 = rarely or none of the time (less than 1 day) to 4 = most or all of the time (5–7 days). To calculate the final CES-D score, the scores of all the items were added. A very high score meant severe depression. We also conducted CFA, with χ2/df = 3.510, RMSEA = 0.022, CFI = 0.994, and Cronbach’s alpha was 0.894.
Generalized Pathological Internet Use Scale (GPIUS)
To measure the students’ generalized pathological use of the internet, Patricia Gomez’s GPIUS was adapted (). A total of 11 items were comprised in this version of the GPIUS, for example, “You connected to the internet even though you knew it could get you in trouble.” The items on the GPIUS were rated on a seven-point Likert scale (1 = completely disagree to 7 = completely agree). In the end, the scores of all the items were added to obtain the total GPIUS score. The higher the score, the more serious the GPIU situation was. We also conducted CFA, with χ2/df = 3.794, RMSEA = 0.023, and CFI = 0.998. Cronbach’s alpha for the GPIUS was 0.883.
Ten-Item Internet Gaming Disorder Test
The Ten-Item Internet Gaming Disorder Test (IGDT-10) comprised 10 items and assesses levels of IGD (). In an attempt to operationalize IGD, this instrument used the nine DSM-5 criteria in a brief and simple manner and adopted clear, unambiguous wording for each item. The diagnostic criteria of IGD based on the DSM-5 were strictly followed while considering recommendations to increase content validity. Each criterion was operationalized using a single item, except for the last criterion, referring to “jeopardy or losing a significant relationship, job, or educational or career opportunity because of participation in internet games” (). This criterion was operationalized through two items given its complexity and description of more than one construct. Response options for the 10 items were never, sometimes, and often instead of yes and no. Consequently, the composite score of IGDT-10 was from 0 to 9, and higher scores indicated more severe cases of IGD. The CFA demonstrates that the fitting index is acceptable: χ2/df = 11.5, RMSEA = 0.045, and CFI = 0.994. Cronbach’s alpha of the scale was 0.68.
Social Network Use Intensity Scale
The original scale used the social strength website questionnaire compiled by Ellison, Steinfield, and Lampe to assess the intensity of youth social networking use (). The questionnaire comprises eight items, and the first two items use a self-reporting method to measure the number of individual social networking friends and the average daily spending on social networking sites. The latter six items use the seven-point Likert review method to measure the emotional connection strength of individuals and social networking sites and the extent to which social networking sites integrate individual life. This questionnaire removes the first two items. This measure includes two self-reported assessments of the Chinese network tools QQ and WeChat. Twelve questions measure the intensity of QQ and WeChat use. Six questions are related to WeChat, and QQ is the same. One sample item is as follows: Social networking sites are part of my daily activities. Participants rated each item on a five-point scale, from 1 (I really disagree) to 5 (I very much agree). All scores were standardized and added together, which is the intensity score for social networking sites. The higher the score, the greater the intensity of social networking sites. We also conducted CFA, with χ2/df = 35.99, RMSEA = 0.138, CFI = 0.865, and Cronbach’s alpha was 0.877.
Statistical Analysis
Liu pointed that the coefficient test results of normal distribution should be combined with the sample size. In large samples (n ≥ 200), the influence of non-normal would be reduced; that is, the assumption of normal distribution in large samples could be slightly violated (). In this study, the test of the normality of variables was carried out by means of graphic test (Q–Q graph). First of all, as shown in the Figure 2, the Q–Q graph was used to test the normality of each variable, and the variables basically presented a normal distribution. The missing values were replaced by means. To prevent measurement errors caused by common method bias, we used Harman single factor analysis (). Next, descriptive and correlation analyses were used. Subsequently, a structure equation model was used to evaluate a multiple mediation model for the roles of social network use, internet gaming disorder, and GPIU in the relationship between loneliness and depression.
FIGURE 2
Moreover, parceling strategy was adopted to improve the quality of the model fit and the indicators (Tian et al., 2017). Firstly, we executed a factor analysis. Then, we sorted the items of each observed variable from highest to lowest according to factor loading size (Rogers and Schmitt, 2004). We sequentially assigned the highest and lowest remaining items to each package in turn and alternated the package until all items were completed.
The fits of the model were assessed using the chi-square (χ2) test, the RMSEA, the CFI, and the TLI. Considering the χ2 test is easily affected by the size of samples, model fit indices were used as the major standard to assess the model fit (). The CFI and TLI ranged from 0 to 1, with values above 0.90 representing sufficient model fit (). A criterion of thumb for the RMSEA is that values ≥0.10 represent poor fit, values between 0.05 and 0.08 represent a reasonable error of approximation, and values ≤0.05 represent close approximation ().
We used the structural equation model to investigate the relationship of these variables through Mplus 7.0. The bootstrapping method was conducted to test the mediation effects. According to the mediation effect test procedure, the direct effect of loneliness on depression was first tested, and then the significance of the path coefficient and the fitting of the model after the addition of the mediator variables social network use, internet gaming disorder, and GPIU were tested. From 1000 resamples of the data, this method produced 95% bias-corrected confidence intervals of these effects. When the confidence interval did not contain zero, it meant that there was a significant effect at p < 0.05.
We conducted the common variance analysis to measure whether common method biases existed in this study. The χ2 test of Bartlett’s test of sphericity was significant. Then, we extracted 12 eigenvalues greater than 1 after a principal component analysis. The first factor to explain the variance was 19.305%. The results were less than the critical standard of 40% (), indicating that these instruments had no problem with the common method biases.
Results
Descriptive Statistics and Correlation Analysis
Table 1 shows the descriptive statistics and Pearson correlation of social network use, loneliness, internet gaming disorder, depression, and GPIU. The results indicated that loneliness had a weak negative correlation with social network use, and there was a significant positive correlation between other variables.
TABLE 1
| Variable | M | SD | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
| Loneliness | 41.42 | 9.16 | 1 | ||||
| Social network use | 49.83 | 14.23 | −0.046* | 1 | |||
| internet gaming disorder | 24.76 | 12.99 | 0.199** | 0.344** | 1 | ||
| GPIU | 31.02 | 12.73 | 0.221** | 0.305** | 0.616** | 1 | |
| Depression | 17.34 | 10.14 | 0.626** | 0.103** | 0.318** | 0.341** | 1 |
Descriptive statistics and correlation matrix of all variables.
N = 2211. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01.
Testing for Multiple Mediating Roles of Social Network Use, Internet Gaming Disorder, and GPIU
First, the finding demonstrated that the path coefficient of loneliness to depression was significantly positive (Figure 3). The fits of this model were χ2/df = 5.78, RMSEA = 0.051, NFI = 0.978, CFI = 0.975, and TLI = 0.968, which indicated that the model was appropriate and acceptable.
FIGURE 3
Second, the indirect effects of internet gaming disorder, social network use, and GPIU between loneliness and depression were explored (Figure 4). The path coefficients of loneliness to internet gaming disorder/social network use, internet gaming disorder to social network use, internet gaming disorder/social network use to GPIU, and GPIU to depression were significantly positive. Specifically, the direct path coefficients of loneliness to GPIU were not significant.
FIGURE 4
Third, most of the mediated effects paths were significant (Table 2). Specifically, loneliness could predict depression through social network/internet gaming disorder to GPIU. However, loneliness could not predict depression through GPIU. The direct effect of loneliness on depression was significant, but path loneliness to GPIU was not significant after the addition of two mediator variables. What is more, loneliness could not predict depression through internet gaming disorder to social network use to GPIU.
TABLE 2
| Path | Standardized path coefficient | 95% confidence interval | |
| Lower | Upper | ||
| a. Total effect model | |||
| Loneliness → depression | 0.044** | 0.012 | 0.078 |
| b. Multiple mediation model | |||
| Loneliness → GPIU → depression | 0.001 | –0.020 | 0.023 |
| Loneliness → internet gaming disorder → GPIU → depression | 0.034** | 0.015 | 0.054 |
| Loneliness → social network use → GPIU → depression | 0.009* | 0.002 | 0.017 |
| Loneliness → internet game disorder → social network use → GPIU → depression | 0.005 | –0.003 | 0.011 |
Test of the total effect model and mediation effect model.
N = 2211. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01.
Discussion
The purpose of this study was to explore the relationship between loneliness and depression and the mediating effects of social network use, internet gaming disorder, and GPIU, in order to further explore the underlying mechanisms by which loneliness affects depression. The total effect model indicated that loneliness could positively predict depression, and Hypothesis 1 was supported. The multiple mediation model showed that loneliness did not affect depression through GPIU, which did not support Hypothesis 2. The model also indicated that the two mediators of internet gaming disorder and social network use parallel mediated the relationship between loneliness and depression through GPIU, which supported Hypotheses 3 and 4. However, the two mediator variables could not have a sequential relationship between loneliness and depression, which did not support Hypothesis 5.
Loneliness and Depression
The result showed that the path coefficients of loneliness to depression were significantly positive, which was consistent with previous studies (Wei et al., 2005; Wang et al., 2008; ; ). Studies have shown that loneliness is still significantly associated with depressive symptoms after controlling for demographic information (including gender, age, financial income, marital status, etc.) and risk factors that jointly influence loneliness and depression (including hostility, social support, stressors, etc.) (; ; Ren et al., 2020). Loneliness is associated with personality disorders, psychiatric disorders, and suicide, which can also impair executive control and increase depressive symptoms (Richman and Sokolove, 1992; ; ; ; ).
Several reasons have been proposed to explain why loneliness is connected with the development of depression. First, lonely individuals always have negative perceptions of things, are susceptible to negative emotions, and often show hostility, and hostility is significantly related to depression (; ). Second, students affected by short-term loneliness and long-term loneliness are more likely to be depressed and unwilling to communicate with others. If these students do not find a proper channel for catharsis, this situation may not improve and may be exacerbated (Van et al., 2017; Sun and Liu, 2018). In addition, defined loneliness as a subjective social isolation, accompanied by personal perceptions, unacceptable painful experiences resulting from isolation or lack of contact with others, and long-term loneliness that has an adverse effect on the health of lonely patients and can cause emotional disorders such as depression. Long-term loneliness can have a negative impact on their blood pressure and immunity, leading to poor health and emotional disorders such as depression (; ).
However, there is a co-existence between depression and loneliness (; ; Ren et al., 2020); people with depression are more likely to feel lonely due to actively avoiding people (Xue, 2017). What is more, individuals with depression tend to lack confidence and have low self-evaluation, which may lead to feelings of loneliness (). Therefore, further longitudinal studies are needed to determine the causal relationship between loneliness and depression.
The Key Mediating Role of GPIU
Loneliness, internet gaming disorder, and social network use were significantly associated with GPIU, and GPIU was significantly related to depression. The results of this study supported the theory by , which pointed that when researchers controlled possible mediating variables, loneliness, depression, and daily stress were positively correlated with greater internet usage. The important finding was that further use of the internet was related to an increase in depression over a subsequent period of time (), which was found in more later studies (; Zou et al., 2007; ; ; Regina et al., 2011). Several studies have mentioned the theoretical basis for the link between loneliness, depression, and internet addiction (; ).
This study found that loneliness was not directly related to depression through GPIU, which was not consistent with previous assumptions. Previous studies supported the idea that some people used the internet to cope with negative emotions such as sadness, anxiety, or loneliness (Scherer, 1997; ; Zhou et al., 2017) or to escape psychological problems (). Affected by cognitive behavioral model, argued that people with psychological problems were more likely to choose to communicate online than face to face in order to compensate for their social skills. However, if people use the internet excessively or inappropriately, it will have a bad effect on body and mind ().
The possible reason about this study result is that loneliness could actually affect depression through GPIU, but as a result of SPIU (internet gaming disorder and pathological social network use) as a mediation variable in the model, the direct effect of loneliness on GPIU is weakened. According to Davis’ cognitive behavior model of PIU (), SPIU and GPIU have a side-by-side relationship, but based on the literature (; Wartberg et al., 2020), we speculate that psychopathology and maladaptive cognition could directly lead to SPIU (e.g., internet gaming disorder and pathological social network use) in some cases and then lead to GPIU. The key to the occurrence of PIU is the emergence of social network use and internet gaming disorder, which is a sufficient cause of PIU symptoms, and which ultimately leads to the development of PIU symptoms, such as depression. Previous studies revealed that pathologic internet use could be associated with depression, substance-related disorders, obsessive–compulsive symptoms, low self-esteem, and attention deficits (Shapira et al., 2000; Tsai and Lin, 2003; ). What is more, pointed that in female adolescents, internet addiction was found to significantly predict subsequent depression, indicating that internet addiction leads to depression and supporting the social displacement hypothesis. The possible reason is that teenagers with internet addiction are addicted to the virtual world, which interferes with their interpersonal relationship in the real world, resulting in the lack of face-to-face communication with others and lack of social support in the real world, so they are prone to become depressed (; Yang, 2016).
Mediating Roles of Social Network Use and Internet Gaming Disorder
In the mediation process of loneliness to internet gaming disorder/social network use to GPIU to depression, the results of this research were consistent with other related research (; Yan, 2009). A possible reason for this similarity is that loneliness is a factor that has been frequently associated with GPIU (; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ). Additionally, social network use and internet gaming disorder are two important forms of internet addiction, and people maintain social connections through these two forms. Loneliness occurs when social connections are cut off (; ), and the emergence of loneliness makes people try to reconnect or establish new connections (Weiss and Bowlby, 1975; ). Social networking chat and internet gaming are critical ways for interpersonal interactions and relaxation (). It is worth noting that it is wise to distinguish between GPIU and specific network-related behavior in question. Research on specific behaviors that individuals engage in on the internet shows that individuals are not addicted to the internet media itself but to the specific behaviors or content they engage in or access (Starcevic, 2013; ).
Social networks are an emerging network of communication media used primarily to maintain existing relationships (; ). Notably, supplementations to offline interpersonal communication are important (). Behavioral experiments have also shown that social site status updates have become an important aspect of social networking sites, and lonely people can significantly reduce the loneliness of personal experiences through social networking sites (). Positive online feedback may be one of the reasons why social network use reduces individual loneliness. Social networks based on acquaintances make it easier for individuals to obtain supportive feedback from, for example, friends and classmates. From a theoretical point of view, Social compensation model theory believes that individuals with less social connections may use the internet to obtain compensation for interpersonal interactions, to meet the psychological needs that are lacking in real life, and to obtain satisfactory social relationships (). In addition, Suler (1999) found that the need for social interaction is one of the needs of internet addiction. When the satisfaction brought by the internet to the lonely individual is stronger than the satisfaction in real life, the lonely individual may be addicted to the internet, which is consistent with the satisfaction theory. However, if the lonely individual relies too much on network compensation and without restraint, it may become a PIU (Zhang et al., 2017). What is more, the model of the poor becoming rich is derived from the theory of social compensation, which believes that the network can enhance the connection between individuals and others and promote the formation of intimate relationships (Tan, 2015). The social lack of lonely individuals in real life can be satisfied through the interactive nature of online games and supportive interpersonal communication (Valkenburg et al., 2005).
What is more, the concealment of the network and the irritability of internet games greatly satisfy the self-demand that they cannot achieve in reality. Internet games have also become a passive lazy escape response to problems. According to the reinforcement theory (Villere and Hartman, 1991), the increasing use and reinforcement of technology are the elements of internet gaming disorder. The improvement of game technology will make individuals psychologically satisfied and thereby escape and eliminate the discomfort brought to them by real life sense. Through continuous learning and upgrading skills in the game, teenagers show their extraordinary wisdom through superb technology, win the attention of all players, and enjoy the sense of accomplishment brought by self-realization (). Due to lack of social support, lonely individuals are more likely to produce negative self-awareness, such as self-denial and inferiority (). The improvement of technology in online games will help lonely people to generate positive self-evaluation and achieve a sense of accomplishment, which in turn increases their dependence on online games, leading to addictive behaviors (; ).
Implications for Prevention of Depression
The results of this study were of great significance to depression prevention and intervention strategies for Chinese students. First of all, junior high school students under great study pressure and housing pressure were very prone to depression. Therefore, depressed students deserve more attention from teachers and parents. Teachers and school doctors are required to improve their quality, pay attention to the psychological status of students, and treat students with a positive attitude. Parents should also strive to provide good parenting for their children. Through appropriate expectations and a harmonious family environment, parents can provide children a benign stimulus so that they can adopt a positive coping style to apply to various contradictions and prevent the formation of adverse emotions (Zhu et al., 2003; ). Furthermore, two strategies can help students cope with depression. One strategy is to overcome the behavioral symptoms of internet addiction, starting with reducing the use of social networking and internet gaming disorder (SPIU). In this regard, the cognitive behavior model is useful (). Moreover, other interventions could focus on initial variables such as loneliness because loneliness is very unfavorable to mental health and promotes depression (Wei et al., 2005). Thus, regular group counseling activities should be organized for junior high school students to promote interaction among students and reduce loneliness, SPIU, GPIU, and depression, respectively.
Limitations and Future Directions
Although this study was conducive to understanding the relationship between loneliness and depression in Chinese students, there were still some limitations. First, this study was a cross-sectional study, and its results could not provide a causal relationship. Therefore, further research could explore the causal relationship between these variables through experiments or longitudinal studies, such as loneliness and depression. Another limitation was that the questionnaire survey used in this study may cause some errors. For example, self-reported questionnaires were influenced by social desirability. Hence, further research may apply more professional surveys (e.g., Survey Monkey or Google Forums) to directly record time spent, eliminating coding data errors and controlling the answers at random. In addition, the convenience sampling may limit the generalizability of the result, so if there is an opportunity, we will expand the sample and increase the randomization level of the sample. What is more, other mediators of the relationship between loneliness and depression (such as meditation), as well as how social network use and internet gaming disorders predict depression, and how the two-way relationship needs to be explored. Last but not least, this study was conducted in the context of Chinese culture, so the cross-cultural applicability of the conclusions must be further verified.
Conclusion
In this study, we discussed the mediating effects of internet gaming disorder, social network use, and GPIU on loneliness and depression, and the conclusions were as follows: (a) loneliness could positively predict depression; (b) loneliness could not predict depression through GPIU directly; (c) loneliness could predict depression through internet gaming disorder to GPIU; (d) loneliness could predict depression through social network use to GPIU; and (e) loneliness could not predict depression through internet gaming disorder to social network use to GPIU.
Statements
Data availability statement
The datasets for this manuscript are not publicly available because the datasets are used only for the team of this article by the permission of the guardians. Requests to access the datasets should be directed to PW, 122394108@qq.com.
Ethics statement
The studies involving human participants were reviewed and approved by the Ethics Committee of Shandong Normal University. The guardians of the participants provided written informed consent to let them participate in this study.
Author contributions
PW was the research designer. JW and YY were in charge of writing. XZ and YT participated in the discussion and offered suggestions. YS was the corresponding author. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.
Funding
This work was supported by the 2018 Shandong Graduate Education Quality Improvement Plan Project under grant number SDYJD18020, fund for Projects of Shandong Social Science Planning under grant number 18CQXJ06, and fund for Projects of Shandong Natural Science under grant number ZR2020MF158.
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to thank the reviewers whose suggestions and comments greatly helped to improve and clarify this manuscript.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
References
1
AkinA.İskenderM. (2011). internet addiction and depression, anxiety and stress.IOJES20138–148.
2
AngR. P.ChongW.ChyeS.HuanV. S. (2012). Loneliness and generalized problematic internet use: parents’ perceived knowledge of adolescents’ online activities as a moderator.Comp. Hum. Behav.281342–1347. 10.1016/j.chb.2012.02.019
3
AntheunisM. L.ValkenburgP. M.PeterJ. (2010). Getting acquainted through social network sites: testing a model of online uncertainty reduction and social attraction.Comp. Hum. Behav.26100–109. 10.1016/j.chb.2009.07.005
4
BarthakurM. M.SharmaM. K. (2012). Problematic internet use and mental health problems.Asian J. Psychiatry5279–280. 10.1016/j.ajp.2012.01.010
5
BirkJ. L.KronishI. M.MoiseN.FalzonL.YoonS.DavidsonK. W. (2019). Depression and multimorbidity: considering temporal characteristics of the associations between depression and multiple chronic diseases.Health Psychol.38802–811. 10.1037/hea0000737
6
BłachnioA.PrzepiorkaA.BoruchW.BałakierE. (2016). Self-presentation styles, privacy, and loneliness as predictors of Facebook use in young people.Personal. Individ. Diff.9426–31. 10.1016/j.paid.2015.12.051
7
BlazerD. (1983). Loneliness: a source book of current theory, research and therapy.J. Behav. Therapy Exp. Psychiatry14:281. 10.1016/0005-7916(83)90066-90066
8
Bouna-PyrrouP.Mühle, Christiane, KornhuberJ.LenzB. (2015). Internet gaming disorder, social network disorder and laterality: handedness relates to pathological use of social networks.J. Neural Transm.1221187–1196. 10.1007/s00702-014-1361-1365
9
BoydD. M.EllisonN. B. (2010). Social network sites: definition, history, and scholarship.J. Comp.-Med. Commun.13210–230. 10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00393.x
10
BozoglanB.DemirerV.SahinI. (2013). Loneliness, self-esteem, and life satisfaction as predictors of internet addiction: a cross-sectional study among Turkish university students.Scand. J. Psychol.54313–319. 10.1111/sjop.12049
11
BrandM.YoungK. S.LaierC.WölflingK.PotenzaM. N. (2016). Integrating psychological and neurobiological considerations regarding the development and maintenance of specific Internet-use disorders: an Interaction of Person-AffectCognition-Execution (I-PACE) model.Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev.71252–266. 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2016.08.033
12
CacioppoJ. T.HawkleyL. C.ErnstJ. M.BurlesonM.BerntsonG. G.NourianiB.et al (2006). Loneliness within a nomological net: an evolutionary perspective.J. Res. Personal.401054–1085. 10.1016/j.jrp.2005.11.007
13
CacioppoJ. T.HawkleyL. C.ThistedR. A. (2010). Perceived social isolation makes me sad: 5-year cross-lagged analyses of loneliness and depressive symptomatology in the chicago health, aging, and social relations study.Psychol. Aging25453–463. 10.1037/a0017216
14
CaganG. (2009). Loneliness: human nature and the need for social connection.Am. J. Peychiatry166375–376. 10.1176/appi.ajp.2008.08091320
15
CaplanS. E. (2002). Problematic internet use and psychosocial well-being: development of a theory-based cognitive-behavioral measurement instrument.Comp. Hum. Behav.18553–575. 10.1016/s0747-5632(02)00004-3
16
CaplanS. E. (2007). Relations among loneliness, social anxiety, and problematic internet use.CyberPsychol. Behav.10234–242. 10.1089/cpb.2006.9963
17
Carvajal-CarrascaG.Caro-CastilloC. V. (2009). Loneliness during adolescence: analysis of the concept.Aquichan9281–296.
18
CeyhanA. A.CeyhanE. (2008). Loneliness, depression, and computer self-efficacy as predictors of problematic internet use.Cyberpsychol. Behav.11699–701. 10.1089/cpb.2007.0255
19
ChenH. L.FuC. L. (2012). The relationship between loneliness, self-esteem and college students’ online game addiction.J. Campus Life Mental Health10374–376. 10.3969/j.issn.1673-1662.2012.06.004
20
ChungJ. E. (2013). Social interaction in online support groups: preference for online social interaction over offline social interaction.Comp. Hum. Behav.291408–1414. 10.1016/j.chb.2013.01.019
21
CudeckR.BrowneM. W. (1992). Constructing a covariance matrix that yields a specified minimizer and a specified minimum discrepancy function value.Psychometrika57357–369. 10.1007/BF02295424
22
DaiG. (2017). The effect of college students’ sense of loneliness on depression.China J. Health Psychol.25297–299. 10.13342/j.cnki.cjhp.2017.02.036
23
DanneelS.NelemansS.SpithovenA.BastinM.BijttebierP.ColpinH.et al (2019). Internalizing problems in adolescence: linking loneliness, social anxiety symptoms, and depressive symptoms over time.J. Abnormal Child Psychol.471691–1705. 10.1007/s10802-019-00539-530
24
DavisR. A. (2001). A cognitive-behavioral model of pathological internet use.Comp. Hum. Behav.17187–195. 10.1016/s0747-5632(00)00041-48
25
De Jong-GiervaldJ. (1987). Developing and testing a model of loneliness.J. Pers. Soc. Psychol.53119–128. 10.1037/0022-3514.53.1.119
26
DemirY.KutluM. (2016). The relationship between loneliness and depression: mediation role of internet addiction.Educ. Process. Int. J.597–105. 10.12973/edupij.2016.52.1
27
DeniroD. A.DorothyA. (1995). Perceived alienation in individs with residual-type schizophrenia.Issues Mental Health Nurs.16185–200. 10.3109/01612849509006934
28
DetersF. G.MehlM. R. (2013). Does posting facebook status updates increase or decrease loneliness: an online social networking experiment.Soc. Psychol. Personal. Sci.4579–586. 10.1177/1948550612469233
29
DoaneL. D. (2008). Loneliness, Stress and Depression Over the Transition to Adulthood: Interpersonal and Physiological Pathways.Ph.D. dissertation, thesisEvanston, IL: Northwestern University.
30
DoeringL. V.MoserD. K.DracupK. (2009). Correlates of anxiety, hostility, depression, and psychosocial adjustment in parents of NICU infants.Neonatal Network:J. Neonatal Nurs.1915–23. 10.1891/0730-0832.19.5.15
31
DowlingN. A.BrownM. (2010). Commonalities in the psychological factors associated with problem gambling and internet dependence.Cyberpsychol. Behav. Soc. Network.13437–441. 10.1089/cyber.2009.0317
32
ElizabethG.JohnC. (2000). Depression on symptoms and cigarette smoking Among teens.Pediatrics106748–755. 10.1542/peds.106.4.748
33
EllisonN. B.SteinfieldC. W. (2006). “Spatially bounded online social networks and social capital: the role of Facebook,” in Proceedings of the Annual Conference of the International Communication Association (ICA), (Dresden), 10.1117/12.343711
34
EmamjomehS. M.BahramiM. (2015). Effect of a supportive-educative program in the math class for stress, anxiety, and depression in female students in the third level of junior high school: an action research.J. Educ. Health Promot.4:10. 10.4103/2277-9531.151916
35
EngelbergE.SjobergL. (2004). internet use, social skills, and adjustment.CyberPsychol. Behav.741–47. 10.1089/109493104322820101
36
ErogluM.PamukM.PamukK. (2013). Investigation of problematic internet usage of university students with psychosocial levels at different levels.Procedia -Social Behav. Sci.103551–557. 10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.10.372
37
FanQ.YuanW. (2018). The correlation between Internet addiction and interpersonal relationship and loneliness among college students.J. Psychiatr.3151–53. 10.4018/978-1-5225-8900-6.ch022
38
FergusonC. J. (2020). Links between screen use and depressive symptoms in adolescents over 16 years: is there evidence for increased harm?Dev. Sci.24:e13008. 10.1111/desc.13008
39
GaoF. Q.GuoZ. X.TianY.SiY. D.WangP. (2018). Relationship between shyness and generalized pathological internet use among chinese school students: the serial mediating roles of loneliness, depression, and self-esteem.Front. Psychol.9:1822. 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01822
40
Garcia-RetameroR.OkanY.MaldonadoA. (2015). The impact of depression on self–other discrepancies in decision making.J. Behav. Decis. Making2889–100. 10.1002/bdm.1833
41
GómezP.HarrisS. K.BarreiroC.IsornaM.RialA. (2017). Profiles of internet use and parental involvement, and rates of online risks and problematic internet use among spanish adolescents.Comp. Hum. Behav.75826–833. 10.1016/j.chb.2017.06.027
42
GreenfieldP.YanZ. (2006). Children, adolescents, and the internet: a new field of inquiry in developmental psychology.Dev. Psychol.42391–394. 10.1037/0012-1649.42.3.391
43
GriffithsM. D.DaviesM. N. O.ChappellD. (2004). Online computer gaming: a comparison of adolescent and adult gamers.J. Adolescence2787–96. 10.1016/j.adolescence.2003.10.007
44
GrossE. F. (2004). Adolescent internet use: what we expect, what teens report.J. Appl. Dev. Psychol.25633–649. 10.1016/j.appdev.2004.09.005
45
GuoQ.RenY.PengJ. Y.ZhangH. L.YangH. (2016). Structural equation model analysis of influencing factors of self-confidence in patients with depression.Chinese Remedies Clin.1665–67.
46
HammenC. (1992). Cognitive, life stress, and interpersonal approaches to a developmental psychopathology model of depression.Dev. Psychopathol.4189–206. 10.1017/s0954579400005630
47
HoldenC. (2000). Global survey examines impact of depression.Science28839–40. 10.1126/science.288.5463.39
48
HouH. X. (2013). The influence of self-consciousness and social support on loneliness of college students.Educ. Higher Educ. Res.2439–40. 10.3969/j.issn.1674-9510.2013.24.031
49
HoyleR. H. (1995). Structural Equation Modeling: Concepts, Issues, and Applications.Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publication, 10.1086/602877
50
HuangJ. (2000). Humanistic research on loneliness.Health Psychol.829–30. 10.3969/j.issn.1005-1252.2000.01.018
51
Jean-PaulM.LaurentB.Jean-MarieS.ChristianH.Jacques-CharlesB.YvesP. (2001). Depression, anxiety and quality of life among scheduled cosmetic surgery patients: multicentre prospective study.J. Craniomaxillofac Surg.29177–180. 10.1054/jcms.2001.0213
52
JiaW. L. (2005). Causes, behavioral manifestations and social hazards of internet addiction.J. Shenyang Agricult. University (Social Sciences Edition)7504–505. 10.3969/j.issn.1008-9713.2005.04.040
53
KimJ.LaRoseR.PengW. (2009). Loneliness as the cause and the effect of problematic internet use: the relationship between internet use and psychological well-being.Cyberpsychol. Behav.12451–455. 10.1089/cpb.2008.0327
54
KimK.RyuE.ChonM. Y.YeunE. J.ChoiS. Y.SeoJ. S.et al (2006). Internet addiction in korean adolescents and its relation to depression and suicidal ideation: a questionnaire survey.Int. J. Nurs. Stud.43185–192. 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2005.02.005
55
KoC. H.YenJ. Y.ChenC. S.YehY. C.YenC. F. (2009). Predictive values of psychiatric symptoms for internet addiction in adolescents: a 2-year prospective study.Arch. Pediatr. Adolesc. Med.163937–943. 10.1001/archpediatrics.2009.159
56
KrautR.PattersonM.LundmarkV.KieslerS.MukopadhyayT.ScherlisW. (1998). internet paradox. a social technology that reduces social involvement and psychological well-being?.Am. Psychol.531017–1031. 10.1037//0003-066X.53.9.1017
57
KuangW. B. (2017). Why are teenagers addicted to online games.People’s Forum22122–123. 10.3969/j.issn.1004-3381.2017.22.056
58
KujathC. L. (2011). Facebook and myspace: complement or substitute for face-to-face interaction?Cyberpsychol. Behav. Soc. Network.1475–78. 10.1089/cyber.2009.0311
59
LeeJ.KoD. W.LeeH. (2019). Loneliness, regulatory focus, inter-personal competence, and online game addiction.Int. Res.29381–394. 10.1108/intr-01-2018-2020
60
LeeS.TamC. L.ChieQ. T. (2014). Mobile phone usage preferences: the contributing factors of personality.Soc. Anxiety Loneliness Soc. Indicat. Res.1181205–1228. 10.1007/s11205-013-0460-462
61
LewinsohnP. M.HopsH.RobertsR. E.SeeleyJ. R.AndrewsJ. A. (1993). Adolescent psychopathology: prevalence and incidence of depression and other dsm–r disorders in high school students.J. Abnormal Psychol.102133–144. 10.1037/0021-843X.102.4.517
62
LiH. L.LeiL.WangZ. Y. (2001). The psychological impact of the internet on people.Psychol. Dynam.4376–381. 10.3969/j.issn.1671-3710.2001.04.014
63
LiT. H.XianY. Y. M.YangZ. H.LiZ. Y.KangZ. Y. (2019). A study on the effects of parental rearing patterns and family environments on adolescent depression-adolescent coping style as a mediator.Adv. Psychol.91652–1661. 10.12677/AP.2019.99201
64
LiY. L.LiuL. Y.YangJ. (2019). Relationship between problem behaviors of left-behind college students and negative emotions and positive personality traits.Chinese J. Mental Health33318–320.
65
LiX. (2020). An Analysis of the Relationship between adolescent attachment and internet overuse.Educ. Observ.977–79.
66
LiM. S. (2015). The relationship between online Games and students’ psychological development.Literacy Numeracy (teachers’ edition): Qual. Educ. Forum25190–190.
67
LiangL.ZhouD.YuanC.ShaoA.BianY. (2016). Gender differences in the relationship between internet addiction and depression: a cross-lagged study in chinese adolescents.Comp. Hum. Behav.63463–470. 10.1016/j.chb.2016.04.043
68
LingY. (2009). The effect of adolescents’ loneliness on depression and the moderating effects of social support.Chin. J. Behav. Med. Brain Sci.18551–553.
69
LiuH.ZhangM.YangQ.YuB. (2019). Gender differences in the influence of social isolation and loneliness on depressive symptoms in college students: a longitudinal study.Soc. Psychiatry Psychiatric Epidemiol.55251–257. 10.1007/s00127-019-01726-1726
70
LiuH. Y. (2019). Advances Statistics for Psychology.Beijing: Renmin University of China Press.
71
LiuQ. X.FangX. Y.DengL. Y.ZhangJ. T. (2012). Parent-adolescent communication, parental internet use and internet-specifific norms and pathological internet use among chinese adolescents.Comp. Hum. Behav.281269–1275. 10.1016/j.chb.2012.02.010
72
LiuY. L. (1995). A preliminary study on the relationship between loneliness, self-esteem and depression.Chinese J. Mental Health9115–116.
73
Lopez-FernandezO. (2018). Generalised versus specific internet use-related addiction problems: a mixed methods study on internet, gaming, and social networking behaviours.Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health15:2913. 10.3390/ijerph15122913
74
LuX.YeoK. J. (2015). Pathological internet use among Malaysia University students: risk factors and the role of cognitive distortion.Comp. Hum. Behav.45235–242. 10.1016/j.chb.2014.12.021
75
LvP. F. (2016). A brief analysis of the impact of the internet on the growth of teenagers.Exam Week63161–161. 10.3969/j.issn.1673-8918.2016.63.141
76
McKennaK. Y. A.BarghJ. A. (2000). Plan 9 from cyberspace: the implications of the internet for personality and social psychology.Personal. Soc. Psychol. Bull.457–75. 10.1207/s15327957pspr0401_6
77
Morahan-MartinJ.SchumacherP. (2000). Incidence and correlates of pathological internet use among college students.Comp. Hum. Behav.1613–29. 10.1016/S0747-5632(99)00049-47
78
Muñoz-RivasM. J.FernándezL.Gámez-GuadixM. (2010). Analysis of the indicators of pathological internet use in Spanish University students.Spanish J. Psychol.13697–707. 10.1017/S1138741600002365
79
MusettiA.CorsanoP. (2018). The internet is not a tool: reappraising the model for internet-addiction disorder based on the constraints and opportunities of the digital environment.Front. Psychol.9:558. 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00558
80
MushtaqR.ShoibS.ShahT.MushtaqS. (2014). Relationship between loneliness, psychiatric disorders and physical health ? a review on the psychological aspects of loneliness.J. Clin. Diag. Res. JCDR8WE01–WE04. 10.7860/JCDR/2014/10077.4828
81
NaamaS.DiklaS. K.YuvalP. (2019). Close social relationships and loneliness: the role of subjective age.Int. Psychogeriatr.111–5. 10.1017/S1041610219001790
82
NeelemanJ.PowerM. J. (1994). Social support and depression in three groups of psychiatric patients and a group of medical controls.Soc. Psychiatry Psychiatric Epidemiol.2946–51. 10.1007/bf00796448
83
NieN. H.HillygusD. S.ErbringL. (2002). “Internet use, interpersonal relations, and sociability: a time diary study. internet,” in Everyday Life, edsBarryW.CarolineH. (Hoboken, NJ: Wiley online Library), 213–243.
84
OdaciH.ÇikrikçiO. (2014). Problematic internet use in terms of gender, attachment styles and subjective well-being in university students.Comp. Hum. Behav.3261–66. 10.1016/j.chb.2013.11.019
85
OdaciH.KalkanM. (2010). Problematic internet use, loneliness and dating anxiety among young adult university students.Comp. Educ.551091–1097. 10.1016/j.compedu.2010.05.006
86
OrsolyaK.SleczkaP.PontesH. M.RóbertU.DemetrovicsZ. (2017). Validation of the ten-item internet gaming disorder test (igdt-10) and evaluation of the nine dsm-5 internet gaming disorder criteria.Add. Behav.64253–260. 10.1016/j.addbeh.2015.11.005
87
ParkS. (2009). The association between internet use and depressive symptoms among south korean adolescents.J. Special. Pediatric Nurs.14230–238. 10.1111/j.1744-6155.2009.00191.x
88
PeplauL. A.PerlmanD. (1979). “Blueprint for a social psychological theory of loneliness,” in Love and attraction, edsPeplauL. A.PerlmanD.CookM.WilsonG. (Pergamon: Oxford), 99–108.
89
PetryN. M.RehbeinF.GentileD. A.LemmensJ. S.RumpfH.MößleT. (2014). An international consensus for assessing internet gaming disorder using the new dsm-5 approach.Addiction1091399–1406. 10.1111/add.12457
90
PodsakoffP. M.MackenzieS. B.LeeJ. Y.PodsakoffN. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies.J. Appl. Psychol.88879–903. 10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879
91
PontesH. M.GriffithsM. D.PatrãoI. M. (2014). Internet addiction and loneliness among children and adolescents in the education setting: an empirical pilot study.Aloma: Revista de Psicologia, Ciències de l Educació i de l Esport3291–99.
92
QualterP.BrownS. L.MunnP.RotenbergK. J. (2010). Childhood loneliness as a predictor of adolescent depressive symptoms: an 8-year longitudinal study.Eur. Child Adolescent Psychiatry19493–501. 10.1007/s00787-009-0059-y
93
ReginaV. D. E.DikeV. D. M.VetR.VermulstA. (2011). Alcohol-specific parenting and adolescents’ alcohol-related problems: the interacting role of alcohol availability at home and parental rules.J. Stud. Alcohol Drugs72408–417. 10.15288/jsad.2011.72.408
94
RenL.HanX.LiD.HuF.LiuJ. (2020). The association between loneliness and depression among chinese college students: affinity for aloneness and gender as moderators.Eur. J. Dev. Psychol.11–14. 10.1080/17405629.2020.178986
95
RichmanN. E.SokoloveR. L. (1992). The experience of aloneness, object representation, and evocative memory in borderline and neurotic patients.Psychoanalytic Psychol.977–91. 10.1037/h0079323
96
RogersW. M.SchmittN. (2004). Parameter recovery and model fit using multidimensional composites: a comparison of four empirical parceling algorithms.Multivariate Behav. Res.39379–412. 10.1207/s15327906mbr3903_1
97
SandersC. E.FieldT. M.DiegoM.KaplanM. (2000). The relationship of internet use to depression and social isolation among adolescents.Adolescence35237–242. 10.1016/S0001-6918(00)00038-X
98
SchererA. (1997). How to profit from. the internet. as handy as a swiss army knife.Dental Economics - Oral Hygiene8754–55. 10.1093/ejo/cjp016
99
ShapiraN. A.GoldsmithT. D.KeckP. E.Jr.KhoslaU. M.McElroyS. L. (2000). Psychiatric features of individuals with problematic internet use.J. Affect. Disord.57267–272. 10.1016/S0165-0327(99)00107-X
100
StarcevicV. (2013). Is Internet addiction a useful concept?Aust. N. Z. J. Psychiatry4716–19. 10.1177/0004867412461693
101
StarcevicV.BillieuxJ.SchimmentiA. (2018). Selfitis, selfie addiction, twitteritis:irresistibleappealofmedicalterminologyforproblematicbehaviours in the digital age.Aust. N. Z. J. Psychiatry52408–409. 10.1177/0004867418763532
102
SukenickS. (2012). Alone together: why we expect more from technology and less from each other by turkle, sherry.J. Anal. Psychol.57128–129. 10.1080/02650533.2013.769209
103
SulerJ. R. (1999). To get what you need: healthy and pathological internet use.Cyberpsychol. Behav.2385–393. 10.1089/cpb.1999.2.385
104
SunM. Y.LiuK. (2018). Analysis of mediating effect of loneliness on social anxiety and depressive symptoms in middle school students.Chinese Health Statist.35926–928.
105
TanZ. M. (2015). The Influence of social networking platforms on college students’ interpersonal relationship.China Adult Educ.82–83. 10.7666/d.D484885
106
TaoS. (2006). Optimism, pessimism and depression: the relations and differences by stress level and gender.Acta Psychol. Sinica38886–901. 10.1097/00024382-200610001-200610089
107
TeunisseR. J.CruysbergJ. R.HoefnagelsW. H.KuinY.VerbeekA. L.ZitmanF. G. (1999). Social and psychological characteristics of elderly visually handicapped patients with the charles bonnet syndrome.Comprehens. Psychiatry40315–319. 10.1016/S0010-440X(99)90133-90135
108
TianY.BianY.HanP.GaoF.WangP. (2017). Associations between psychosocial factors and generalized pathological internet use in chinese university students: a longitudinal cross-lagged analysis.Comp. Hum. Behav.72178–188. 10.1016/j.chb.2017.02.048
109
TijhuisM. A.DeJ. J.FeskensE. J.KromhoutD. (1999). Changes in and factors related to loneliness in older men. the zutphen elderly study.Age Ageing28491–495. 10.1093/ageing/28.5.491
110
TsaiC. C.LinS. S. J. (2003). internet addiction of adolescents in taiwan: an interview study.CyberPsychol. Behav.6649–652. 10.1089/109493103322725432
111
ValkenburgP. M.SchoutenA. P.PeterJ. (2005). Adolescents’ identity experiments on the internet.New Media Soc.7383–402. 10.1177/1461444805052282
112
VanD. B. R. H. S.SchutterN.HanssenD. J. C.ElzingaB. M.Rabeling-KeusI. M.StekM. L.et al (2017). Prognostic significance of social network, social support and loneliness for course of major depressive disorder in adulthood and old age.Epidemiol. Psychiatric Sci.27266–277. 10.1017/S2045796017000014
113
VazquezA. J.GarciaR. J. (1997). The Mannheim interview on social support psychometric characteristics of spanish version.Soc. Psychiatry Psychiatric Epidemiol.32208–221. 10.1007/BF00788240
114
VillereM. F.HartmanS. S. (1991). Reinforcement theory: a practical tool.Leadership Organ. Dev. J.1227–31. 10.1108/01437739110138039
115
WangY. L.WangJ. P.FuD. D. (2008). Epidemiological survey of internet users’ addiction in primary and middle school students.Chinese J. Mental Health22678–682. 10.3321/j.issn:1000-6729.2008.09.014
116
WartbergL.KristonL.ThomasiusR. (2020). Internet gaming disorder and problematic social media use in a representative sample of german adolescents: prevalence estimates, comorbid depressive symptoms and related psychosocial aspects.Comp. Hum. Behav.10331–36. 10.1016/j.chb.2019.09.014
117
WeiM.RussellD. W.ZakalikR. A. (2005). Adult attachment, social self-efficacy, self-disclosure, loneliness, and subsequent depression for freshman college students: a longitudinal study.J. Counsel. Psychol.52602–614. 10.1037/0022-0167.52.4.602
118
WeissR. S.BowlbyJ. (1975). Loneliness: the experience of emotional and social isolation.Contemporary Sociol.2539–41. 10.2307/2062224
119
XuH. Y. (2012). Experimental Research on middle School Students’ Mental Health, Attribution Style and Attribution TrainingDoctoral dissertation, thesisChina: Qufu Normal University.
120
XueY. (2017). The role of introverted personality and social support in the mediating effects of depression and loneliness for medical students.Chin. J. Behav. Med. Brain Sci.26820–824.
121
YanH. (2009). Analysis of the causes of college students’ internet game addiction and its strategy research.Stud. Ideol. Educ.11106–108.
122
YangC.WangW. X.SunJ. H. (2010). Social adaptability of internet addiction teenagers.Chin. Special Educ.885–90. 10.3969/j.issn.1007-3728.2010.08.017
123
YangJ. (2016). The influence of the online virtual world on individual psychology.Sci. Educ. Article Collects1151–152.
124
YaoL. H.YangD. L. (2014). Analysis of the status of internet addiction of college students and their emotional characteristics.Value Eng.326–328.
125
YoungK.KimberlyS. (2007). Cognitive behavior therapy with internet addicts: treatment outcomes and implications.CyberPsychol. Behav.10671–679. 10.1089/cpb.2007.9971
126
YoungK. S.KimberlyS. (1998). internet addiction: the emergence of a new clinical disorder.CyberPsychol. Behav.1237–244. 10.1089/cpb.1998.1.237
127
YoungK. S.RogersR. C. (1998). The relationship between depression and internet addiction.Cyberpsychol. Behav.1178–183. 10.1089/cpb.1998.1.25
128
ZhangG. H.LeiL. (2015). The relationship between online game experience and online game addiction among adolescents: a cross–lagged regression analysis.J. Psychol. Sci.38883–888.
129
ZhangM. Y. (2000). Thoughts on chinese psychiatry in the 21st century.Shanghai Psychiatry121–2.
130
ZhangY. Q.LiuY. C.ZhangH.ZhouX. Z. (2017). The relationship between Social support and internet Addiction under the theory of loss compensation: the chain mediating effect of basic psychological needs and coping styles.Eng. Res.1116–18. 10.3969/j.issn.1671-3818.2017.11.005
131
ZhangZ. Y. (2017). Psychological problems and performance of junior high school students and counseling strategies.Educ. Innovat.2:20.
132
ZhouF.LiuR. D.GuoM. J.JiangS. Y. (2017). Negative affect of teenagers and internet addiction: modulating effect of orientations to happiness.Chin. J. Clin. Psychol.25208–212. 10.16128/j.cnki.1005-3611.2017.02.003
133
ZhuW. H.GuY. Q.HuangX. T. (2003). The impact of family support on coping styles of junior middle school students.Chin. J. Clin. Psychol.1305–306. 10.3969/j.issn.1005-3611.2003.04.024
134
ZouX. M.DingB. G.YuJ.ZhangX. P.ZouH. (2007). The influence of network on adolescent health and counter- measures.J. Clin. Psychosomatic Dis.13178–179. 10.3969/j.issn.1672-187X.2007.02.046
Summary
Keywords
loneliness, internet gaming disorder, social network use, depression, multiple mediating effects, generalized pathological internet use
Citation
Wang P, Wang J, Yan Y, Si Y, Zhan X and Tian Y (2021) Relationship Between Loneliness and Depression Among Chinese Junior High School Students: The Serial Mediating Roles of Internet Gaming Disorder, Social Network Use, and Generalized Pathological Internet Use. Front. Psychol. 11:529665. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.529665
Received
26 January 2020
Accepted
23 December 2020
Published
12 February 2021
Volume
11 - 2020
Edited by
Claudio Longobardi, University of Turin, Italy
Reviewed by
Hengliang Yeh, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taiwan; Niko Männikkö, Oulu University of Applied Sciences, Finland
Updates
Copyright
© 2021 Wang, Wang, Yan, Si, Zhan and Tian.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Yingdong Si, 1021865921@qq.com
†These authors share first authorship
This article was submitted to Educational Psychology, a section of the journal Frontiers in Psychology
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.