In the published article, there was an error. In the section Materials and Methods, Measures, Beliefs, Attitudes, and Intentions, Behavioral Intentions. It was reported that participants were presented with 10 items of Moskalenko and McCauley's (2009) Activism and Radicalism scale. This was not the case. Although the items used in the 10-item intention index included behaviors that overlap with behaviors mentioned in the ARIS scale, the ARIS scale itself was not used as a measurement tool for intentions in this article.
A correction has therefore been made to Materials and Methods, Measures, Beliefs, Attitudes, and Intentions, Behavioral Intentions, Paragraph 1. It was previously stated, “we presented them with 10 items of the Activism and Radicalism scale (ARIS; e.g., If I lived in the HLA's territory, I would consider using deadly weapons against the HLA's enemies; Moskalenko and McCauley, 2009).” This should be “we presented them with a 10-item index (e.g., If I lived in the HLA's territory, I would consider using deadly weapons against the HLA's enemies).” The corrected paragraph appears below:
Intentions represent perceived motivations to engage in specific behaviors. To gauge participants' intentions to act in support of the HLA, we presented them with a 10-item index (e.g., If I lived in the HLA's territory, I would consider using deadly weapons against the HLA's enemies). All items in the scale loaded on a single factor, the reliability estimate of which was good (α = 0.93).
The authors apologize for this error and state that this does not change the scientific conclusions of the article in any way. The original article has been updated.
Publisher's note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
References
1
Moskalenko S. McCauley C. (2009). Measuring political mobilization: the distinction between activism and radicalism. Terror. Polit. Violenc.21, 239–260. 10.1080/09546550902765508
Summary
Keywords
terrorism, radicalization, narratives, narcissism, Machiavellianism, psychopathy, sadism, vividness
Citation
Braddock K, Schumann S, Corner E and Gill P (2022) Corrigendum: The moderating effects of “dark” personality traits and message vividness on the persuasiveness of terrorist narrative propaganda. Front. Psychol. 13:1013827. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1013827
Received
07 August 2022
Accepted
12 August 2022
Published
02 November 2022
Volume
13 - 2022
Edited and reviewed by
David Winter, University of Hertfordshire, United Kingdom
Updates
Copyright
© 2022 Braddock, Schumann, Corner and Gill.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Kurt Braddock braddock@american.edu
This article was submitted to Personality and Social Psychology, a section of the journal Frontiers in Psychology
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.