CORRECTION article

Front. Psychol., 21 September 2022

Sec. Health Psychology

Volume 13 - 2022 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1019707

Corrigendum: The impacts of mind-wandering on flow: Examining the critical role of physical activity and mindfulness

  • 1. Institute of Sports Science, Nantong University, Nantong, China

  • 2. School of Psychology, Shanghai University of Sport, Shanghai, China

  • 3. School of Kinesiology, Shanghai University of Sport, Shanghai, China

Article metrics

View details

1,2k

Views

516

Downloads

In the published article a required Author's note was missing. The authors received a license to use Short Dispositional Flow Scale (S-DFS) from Mind Garden, Inc. which was not mentioned in the article. This has now been included in an Author's note as follows:

Author's note

The authors received a license to use the Short Dispositional Flow Scale (S-DFS) (Copyright © 2002, 2009, S. A. Jackson) from Mind Garden, Inc. and received permission to use S-DFS in the current study.

In addition, in the published article there were errors in Materials and methods, Measures, Flow, Paragraph 1. Firstly, Jackson, et al., 2010 was not cited. The citation has now been inserted in the revised paragraph below. Secondly, in sentence 1, the following statement was missing “(Copyright © 2002, 2009 by S. A. Jackson, the authors have made a license purchase from Mind Garden, Inc., and received permission to use S-DFS in the current study),” Finally, in sentence 2 the example given, “I feel I am competent enough to meet the high demands of the situation” should have been “I found the experience extremely rewarding”. The paragraph has now been revised as follows:

“The dispositional flow was assessed by the Short Dispositional Flow Scale (S-DFS) (Copyright © 2002, 2009 by S. A. Jackson, we have made a license purchase from Mind Garden, Inc., and received permission to use S-DFS in current study), which consists of 9 items and uses a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 1 (never) to 5 (always) (Jackson et al., 2008, 2010). The averaged scores for each item of S-DFS were calculated, with higher scores indicating greater levels of dispositional flow (e.g., “I found the experience extremely rewarding”). The validity on Chinese version of S-DFS has beenexamined with adequate model fit for confirmatory factor analysis as follows: χ2/df = 2.49, CFI = 0.91, NNFI = 0.88, and RMSEA = 0.058 (Liu, 2010). Cronbach's alpha for the S-DFS was 0.73, indicating satisfactory reliability.”

The authors apologize for these errors and state that this does not change the scientific conclusions of the article in any way. The original article has been updated.

References

  • 1

    Jackson S. A. Martin A. J. Eklund R. C. (2008). Long and short measures of flow: the construct validity of the FSS-2, DFS-2, and new brief counterparts. J. Sport Exerc. Psychol.30, 561587. 10.1123/jsep.30.5.561

  • 2

    Jackson S. A. Martin A. J. Eklund R. C. (2010). Short Dispositional Flow Scale. Menlo Park, CA: Mind Garden.

  • 3

    Liu W. (2010). Revision on Chinese edition of the short flow state scale and the short dispositional flow scale. China Sport Sci.30, 6470. 10.16469/j.css.2010.12.012

Summary

Keywords

mind-wandering, physical activity, mindfulness, flow, mediation analysis

Citation

Deng Y-Q, Zhang B, Zheng X, Liu Y, Wang X and Zhou C (2022) Corrigendum: The impacts of mind-wandering on flow: Examining the critical role of physical activity and mindfulness. Front. Psychol. 13:1019707. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1019707

Received

15 August 2022

Accepted

18 August 2022

Published

21 September 2022

Approved by

Frontiers Editorial Office, Frontiers Media SA, Switzerland

Volume

13 - 2022

Updates

Copyright

*Correspondence: Yu-Qin Deng

This article was submitted to Health Psychology, a section of the journal Frontiers in Psychology

Disclaimer

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Outline

Cite article

Copy to clipboard


Export citation file


Share article

Article metrics