Abstract
Introduction:
Romania shares the longest UE border with Ukraine, and since the Russian invasion of Ukraine began, many have been involved in helping the refugees. Consequently, children and adolescents might be directly and indirectly exposed to war-related trauma. In the present exploratory research, we investigated Romanian adolescents’ potential risk and protective factors related to the psychological outcomes of war exposure. Our cross-sectional study was conducted shortly after February 24th (i.e., the first invasion day).
Methods:
The sample included 90 Romanian adolescents aged 11 to 15 (M = 12.90, SD = 1.17), residents in Iași, Romania (i.e., 205,7 km from the Ukrainian border). Participants completed self-reported measures of peritraumatic dissociative experiences, knowledge about the conflict in Ukraine, personal, school, and family implications in volunteering/helping behavior, discussions about the conflict, threat perception (self and perceived parental threat), anxiety, social media engagement, resilience, and moral elevation.
Results:
The main findings suggested that participants involved in helping behaviors toward Ukrainian refugees present higher peritraumatic dissociative experiences, anxiety symptoms, and higher moral elevation than boys and participants not involved in these behaviors. Moreover, anxiety symptoms were positively associated with threat perception, peritraumatic dissociation, and social media engagement and negatively related to resilience.
Discussions:
Finally, we discuss the implications of our findings concerning their practical utility in managing peritraumatic exposure to war by using interventions designed to increase adolescents’ resilience during difficult times.
Introduction
February 24th, 2022 marked the beginning of the Russian invasion of Ukraine. Initial findings suggested that this war caused deep physical and psychological trauma to its citizens (), along with severe damage to the civilian infrastructure, the country’s economy, the environment, and finally, to its freedom and democratic values (; ; ). Romanians have rapidly mobilized to help Ukrainian refugees since the war started, through various civic actions, in addition to the subsequent governmental measures (). The large-scale Romanians’ mobilization included public protests against the Russian invasion, fundraising actions and calls, the creation of Facebook groups for the coordination of the aid effort, convoys transporting supplies to border crossings, and numerous offers of transportation and shelter (). According to , those who are now participating in humanitarian rescue operations – such as the Romanians - face the risk of secondary trauma due to their constant exposure to others’ trauma. Similar previous findings were reported by studies exploring the posttraumatic reactions among rescue personnel (e.g., ).
The consequences of war trauma have been studied in various studies, highlighting the long-term impact on the victims and their families (e.g., ). Previous studies suggested that those who witness violence during the early stages of life (childhood and adolescence included) are at an increased risk of developing posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) should they experience another traumatic event while in adulthood (). The present research focused on the potential emotional consequences and the related risk and resilience factors concerning Romanian adolescents in the context of the Russian invasion of Ukraine. More specifically, we were interested in exploring Romanian adolescents’ reactions to the war at their country’s border.
Previous research also highlighted a significant link between peritraumatic dissociation (i.e., one of the most critical acute reactions to a traumatic event; ) and PTSD among people repeatedly exposed to an armed conflict, such as the war in Ukraine (Duagani Masika et al., 2019). Similarly, studies on children and adolescents suggested that war exposure and mortality salience are significantly linked to elevated levels of depression and anxiety (). In addition, in the case of war-related trauma exposure, peritraumatic dissociative experiences are common effects among youth (). Depersonalization, a lack of subjective feelings, out-of-body experiences, and altered pain sensations are all symptoms of peritraumatic dissociation, causing a distorted sense of time and place (; ).
The link between peritraumatic dissociative experiences and anxiety has been extensively studied in various contexts, from parental stress related to their children’s health (e.g., ), natural disasters () to the clinicians fighting the COVID-19 pandemic (). Given the missing data regarding the war in Ukraine, we aimed to fill this gap by exploring the link between peritraumatic dissociative experiences and anxiety among Romanian teenagers exposed to this conflict.
Threat perception: The role of social media engagement
Collective threats primarily refer to military, economic, and political threats, while individual threats might refer to the perceived potential adverse repercussions for one’s physical safety, personal health, or wealth (). Regardless of age or developmental status, we perceive and react to threatening situations and detect modern threats, such as fire weapons (). When discussing war-related threat perception (i.e., war as a direct traumatic factor), previous studies suggested that adolescents threatened by military conflicts are generally reporting lower levels of well-being (), decreased life satisfaction (), and higher levels of stress (). Furthermore, higher levels of perceived parental stress (due to increased threat perception) in military conflict-related contexts seem to be significantly associated with higher stress levels in adolescents (Shamai and Kimhi, 2007). However, gender appears to moderate these relationships, as well as the symptoms of PTSD due to military conflict exposure (with females generally reporting higher means; ).
As growing research suggests, social media engagement is essential in modeling threat perception in various contexts. For example, more information related to the threat (e.g., COVID-19) seem to be related to a higher perceived threat (e.g., Yang et al., 2020). The Russian-Ukrainian conflict has been called the world’s “First TikTok War” and “The Most Online War of All Time Until the Next One” (). Both parties are using social media to share information related to the conflict, and photos of the atrocities committed in the assaulted Ukrainian cities have millions of views on various social media platforms, from Facebook to Twitter and Tik Tok (). Investigations have already revealed that TikTok is also feeding war-related disinformation and fake content to new users, even if they do not search for Ukraine-related content ().
As suggested, billions of people worldwide are despairingly watching this battle theater (through social media and news, we would add) and have expressed emotions of powerlessness regarding the situation. Furthermore, this prolonged exposure to helplessness is a major risk factor for depression and other psychological disturbances, even more at present, after two pandemic years (Plomecka et al., 2021; ).
War exposure and resilience
Resilience can be described as a process leading to positive adaptation in the face of significant adversity () and is vital for survival and evolution (). Previous research on children and adolescents exposed to trauma revealed several factors underlying this process. For example, a positive image of self, perceived family and social support, and positive family relations seem to act as protective factors against the development of PTSD and other adverse psychological symptoms (Brajša-Žganec, 2005; Tol et al., 2013).
As suggested, war-exposed teenagers seem more resilient when they use problem-solving skills, participate in leisure activities, have parents who spend time with them and provide academic support. Also, these associations seem to be stronger for males (). Furthermore, previous studies suggested that teacher-student communication focused on emotional support during war exposure might contribute to adolescents’ resilience (). Similarly, classroom-based intervention programs delivered by teachers can effectively reduce negative reactions and strengthen student resilience in the face of traumatic events, such as war (e.g., Werner, 2012).
Trauma and moral elevation
Finally, moral elevation describes a positive emotional state triggered by observing an act that one would consider highly virtuous, such as acts of charity, compassion, or perseverance (McGuire and Mignogna, 2021). These witnessed experiences might inspire and uplift the observer (), being generally followed by the aspirations to imitate the observed virtue and become a better person ().
Numerous studies have suggested that exposure to elevating stimuli increases prosocial behavior (Van de Vyver and Abrams, 2015), positive affect, social interaction (), resilience and well-being (), while lowering anxiety and depression (). Furthermore, experimental investigations suggested that people with PTSD who were subsequently exposed to moral elevation stimuli might report more positive cognitions about others and the world, feel inspired, and engage in more compassionate goals (McGuire and Mignogna, 2021). Also, individuals exposed to trauma (i.e., mass shootings) who endorsed elevation reported increased compassion toward others and higher posttraumatic growth (Tingey et al., 2017). Thus, elevation is associated with resilience, improved psychological health, and social involvement, even in the case of trauma exposure, by providing the opportunity to directly target the negative effects of PTSD through cognitive, emotional, and behavioral experiences linked to trauma recovery ().
In the present research, we considered that witnessing the virtuous acts of the Romanians at the border, especially those near the participants in our sample (who were all adolescents from a town very close to the Ukrainian border), reading or discussing them through social media, peer or school groups, might be the moral elevation trigger proposed in theoretical framework, further leading to the activation of positive-valence systems and, finally, the strong desire to imitate the witnessed behavior.
The present study
The present study aimed to investigate Romanian adolescents’ emotional outcomes concerning the Ukrainian conflict (i.e., peritraumatic dissociative experiences, anxiety symptoms, and threat perception). Given the exploratory nature of our research and the novelty of the war-related context, our approach explored the potential connections between these variables of interest, to shape a comprehensive view of these possible connections. In addition, we explored the potential protective and risk factors in this regard, i.e., adolescents’ resilience, personal, family, and school implications in volunteering/helping behavior toward the Ukrainian refugees, social media engagement, information sources, and discussions about the conflict, familiarity/closeness with Ukrainians, and demographic factors. Finally, another aim of this research was to assess whether others’ implications in volunteering/helping behavior toward the Ukrainian refugees might lead to moral elevation among adolescents.
Given the previous findings concerning our variables of interest, our exploratory assumptions were the following:
H1: More frequent discussions about the conflict would be associated with higher resilience (through perceived social support; ), especially in the case of male participants ();H2: Female teenagers would report higher levels of peritraumatic dissociative experiences, threat perception, and anxiety than male participants (); H3: Higher levels of perceived parental threat perception would be significantly associated with participants’ higher perceived threat and anxiety (Shamai and Kimhi, 2007); H4: Personal, family, or school (teachers’) implications in volunteering/helping behavior would generate significant differences regarding peritraumatic dissociative experiences and anxiety symptoms (); H5: Higher knowledge about the military situation in Ukraine would be associated with increased social media engagement, which would further be linked to increased threat perception, peritraumatic dissociative experiences, and anxiety ().
Materials and methods
Participants
Our sample included 90 Romanian adolescents aged 11 to 15 (M = 12.90, SD = 1.17). The sample was relatively balanced regarding gender (male participants = 47.52.2%, and female participants = 43.47.8%). They were residents in Iași, Romania, a city in the northeastern part of Romania, close to the Ukrainian border (i.e., 205,7 km). They came from two-parent families in the urban area. Their participation was voluntary, following their parents’ consent.
Procedures
We started collecting our data 3 weeks following the beginning of the war in Ukraine, following the ethical standards of the Helsinki Declaration. The Ethical Board from the university where the authors are affiliated approved the research. We collected our data in person, using the paper-pencil method, following parental approval. We informed the participants that participation was voluntary, there were no right and wrong answers, their responses would only be used for the present research. And they could withdraw from the study at any time, that the data they would provide would be anonymous, and that all information would remain confidential. The time needed to answer all the items was around 25 min.
The present study
Measures
We used the back-translation procedure () for some scales (i.e., scales assessing peritraumatic dissociative experiences, anxiety, social media engagement, and resilience). The minimal differences between the original and back-translated versions were reconciled, resulting in the final versions of each instrument.
Peritraumatic dissociative experiences
We used the scale developed by Marmar et al. (1997), i.e., the Peritraumatic Dissociative Experiences Questionnaire (PDEQ), to measure peritraumatic dissociation. The 10-item self-reported questionnaire uses a 5-point Likert scale, ranging from 1 = strongly disagree to 5 = strongly agree. Participants were asked to think about how they felt the past few days and choose the answer that suited them the most. Cronbach’s alpha for this scale was.89.
Knowledge about the conflict in Ukraine
We asked participants how well they knew the military conflict situation in Ukraine (i.e., How well do you know the situation in Ukraine?). They answered on a 5-point Likert scale, ranging from 1 = not at all to 5 = very well. Next, we also asked them about the sources of the information related to the situation in Ukraine (open-end question).
Personal and family implications in volunteering/helping behavior
We further asked the participants whether they or their family members were involved in helping behavior toward the Ukrainian refugees since the conflict started – Yes/No answers. Next, we also asked them about the types of helping behavior (e.g., helping with food and hygiene products/offering transportation/offering money/medical assistance).
School implication—volunteering/helping behavior
We asked the participants whether the school they belonged to was implicated in volunteering/helping actions (Yes/No questions).
Discussing the conflict
We asked the participants about the frequency of the talks about the Ukrainian conflict with family, teachers, friends, classmates, and other family members. We used a 5-point Likert scale (from 1 = never to 5 = very often, every day; see Appendix A). Higher scores indicate higher talk frequency.
Threat perception (self)
We used an adapted version of the scale developed by Marciano et al. (2022) to assess the perceived threats related to the war in Ukraine. We used a 5-point Likert scale, ranging from 1 (not at all) to 5 (very much). The four items are detailed in Supplementary Appendix A. Higher scores indicated a higher perceived threat. Cronbach’s alpha for this scale was 0.71, and the inter-item correlation mean was.39.
Threat perception (parents)
In the case of the perceived parental threat (i.e., how participants perceived their parents’ threat concerning the war in Ukraine), we used the same items for adolescents but adapted them to this parental context. Higher scores indicated a higher perceived parental threat. Cronbach’s alpha for this scale was 0.79, and the inter-item correlation mean was.49. Also, we asked adolescents to indicate which parent (or close relative) they report these answers about.
Anxiety
We used the 41-item Screen for Child Anxiety Related Disorders – Child version (SCARED), developed by , the Romanian version (). The answers were given on a Likert scale ranging from 0 (not true or hardly true) to 2 (very true or often true). We used the overall score in the present study. Cronbach’s alpha for the overall scale was 0.87.
Social media engagement
We used an adapted version of the Social Media Engagement Scale for Adolescents (SMEQ-A; ), referring to the use of social media to check information regarding the situation in Ukraine. The 11-item scale measures participants’ responses on a Likert scale ranging from 1 t (not at all true) to 5 (very true). Higher scores indicated higher social media engagement to check for news related to the war. Cronbach’s alpha in the present study was 0.90.
Resilience
We used the Adolescent Psychological Resilience Scale, developed by Bulut et al. (2013). The 29-item scale measures adolescents’ resilience using a 4-point Likert scale ranging from 1 (not exactly suitable for me) to 4 (entirely suitable for me). We used the overall score of the scale. Higher scores indicated higher resilience. Cronbach’s alpha for the overall scale was 0.81.
Moral elevation
We constructed two items to measure moral elevation in the context of the Ukrainian conflict, using moral scenarios similar to the ones used in previous studies (e.g., Zheng et al., 2019; see the Appendix). The inter-item correlation mean between the two items was 0.40.
We used a demographic scale to assess participants’ gender and age. Also, in the first section of the questionnaire, we asked the participants what/which were the primary sources of information regarding the conflict in Ukraine and what volunteering/helping behavior they (or their families) were involved in.
Results
Preliminary steps
Before beginning our data analysis, we screened the data for potential errors. There were no missing responses or modifications discovered in our data. Next, we analyzed the normality of the variables (i.e., Skewness and Kurtosis values ranging from [−2; 2]; ). In our case, the data was normally distributed. Table 1 presents the descriptive statistics for all the primary variables. Table 2 describes the primary sources of information regarding the conflict in Ukraine.
Table 1
| M | SD | Min | Max | Skewness | Kurtosis | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Knowledge about the conflict | 3.78 | 0.78 | 1 | 5 | −0.45 | 0.79 |
| 2. Threat perception (self) | 9.25 | 3.34 | 4 | 19 | 0.48 | 0.29 |
| 3. Threat perception (parents) | 10.57 | 3.97 | 4 | 20 | 0.17 | −0.57 |
| 4. Discussions about the conflict | 14.82 | 5.51 | 5 | 25 | 0.13 | −0.69 |
| 5. Resilience | 88.15 | 11.47 | 53 | 109 | −0.54 | 0.44 |
| 6. Peritraumatic dissociative experiences | 27.51 | 10.36 | 10 | 50 | 0.14 | −0.78 |
| 7. Social media engagement | 32.36 | 10.87 | 11 | 54 | −0.21 | −0.80 |
| 8. Moral elevation | 9.22 | 3.32 | 3 | 14 | −0.06 | −1.11 |
| 9. Anxiety | 69.88 | 17.83 | 46 | 123 | 0.92 | 0.67 |
Descriptive statistics for all the primary variables (N = 90).
Table 2
| Information source | N | % |
|---|---|---|
| Press - TV | 40 | 44.44 |
| Press (TV) and school | 2 | 2.22 |
| Press (TV) and other people | 2 | 2.22 |
| Press (TV) and the Internet | 7 | 7.77 |
| Press (TV) and parents | 4 | 4.44 |
| Youtube | 1 | 1.11 |
| The Internet | 5 | 5.55 |
| Social media (unspecified) | 1 | 1.11 |
| Press and Tik Tok | 7 | 7.77 |
| Tik Tok and Youtube | 1 | 1.11 |
| Tik Tok and the Internet | 1 | 1.11 |
| Tik Tok and news (press) | 19 | |
| Helping behaviors (volunteering) | ||
| I was not involved in volunteering/helping behaviors (neither was my family). | 69 | 76.7 |
| I/ We offered free housing | 1 | 1.1 |
| I/ We offered food, subsistence products, and hygiene products | 7 | 7.8 |
| I/ We offered free housing, food, and hygiene products | 1 | 1.1 |
| I/ We offered food, hygiene products, and donated money to NGOs | 2 | 2.2 |
| I/ We provided medical assistance | 1 | 1.1 |
| I/ We donated money to NGOs or similar entities in order to help the refugees | 1 | 1.1 |
| I/ We offered food and hygiene products | 8 | 8.9 |
Primary information sources regarding the conflict in Ukraine and volenteering behaviors.
Associations between the main variables
Correlation analyses (see Table 3) suggested that the knowledge about the conflict in Ukraine was positively associated with the discussions about the war (r = 0.39, p < 0.001), peritraumatic dissociative experiences (r = 0.25, p = 0.01), and moral elevation (r = 0.22, p = 0.03). Participants’ threat perception was positively associated with the perceived parental threat (r = 0.56, p < 0.001), peritraumatic dissociative experiences (r = 0.25, p = 0.01), anxiety (r = 0.34, p = 0.001), and negatively related to resilience. More frequent discussions about the war were associated with higher peritraumatic dissociative experiences (r = 0.35, p = 0.001) and social media engagement (r = 0.44, p < 0.001). Also, participants’ resilience was negatively associated with their anxiety (r = −0.25, p = 0.01). Furthermore, the reported peritraumatic dissociative experiences were significantly related to social media engagement (r = 0.29, p = 0.006), moral elevation (r = 0.26, p = 0.01), and anxiety (r = 0.36, p < 0.001). Finally, age was significantly linked to the discussions about the war (r = 0.27, p = 0.00) and social media engagement (r = 0.22, p = 0.03).
Table 3
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Knowledge about the conflict | 1 | ||||||||
| 2. Threat perception (self) | 0.06 | 1 | |||||||
| 3. Threat perception (parents) | 0.11 | 0.56** | 1 | ||||||
| 4. Discussions about the conflict | 0.39** | 0.14 | 0.03 | 1 | |||||
| 5. Resilience | −0.14 | −0.32* | −0.04 | −0.00 | 1 | ||||
| 6. Peritraumatic Dissociative Experiences | 0.25* | 0.25* | 0.11 | 0.35** | −0.20 | 1 | |||
| 7. Social media engagement | 0.34** | −0.03 | 0.18 | 0.44** | −0.04 | 0.29** | 1 | ||
| 8. Moral elevation | 0.22* | 0.20 | 0.13 | 0.19 | 0.05 | 0.26* | 0.17 | 1 | |
| 9. Anxiety | 0.15 | 0.34** | 0.19 | 0.19 | −0.25* | 0.36** | 0.24* | 0.18 | 1 |
| 10. Age | 0.01 | −0.17 | −0.11 | 0.27* | 0.02 | 0.00 | 0.22* | −0.04 | −0.14 |
Associations between the primary variables (N = 90).
*p < 0.05; **p ≤ 0.001.
Gender differences
We further tested for the potential gender differences concerning the primary variables of our study. Results suggested that girls in our sample reported significantly higher perceived threat (M = 10.02) than boys (M = 8.55), t(88) = −2.12, p = 0.03. A significant difference (t(88) = −1.96, p = 0.05) was also observed concerning participants’ anxiety, with girls (M = 73.69) scoring significantly higher than boys (M = 66.40). Finally, girls reported higher moral elevation (M = 10.32) than boys (M = 8.21), t(88) = −3.16, p = 0.002.
Differences by self or family implication in volunteering/helping behavior
We tested for the potential differences concerning the primary variables of our study depending on participants’ implication (or their family’s implication) in volunteering/helping behaviors toward the Ukrainian refugees. Results suggested that the only significant differences were related to the peritraumatic dissociative experiences and moral elevation. Participants involved in such actions (or their families’ implication; N = 21) reported higher peritraumatic dissociative experiences, t(88) = −2.01, p = 0.04, and higher moral elevation, t(88) = −2.25, p = 0.02.
Differences by school’s implication in volunteering/helping behavior
Next, we tested for the potential differences concerning the primary variables of our study depending on the participants’ school’s implication in volunteering/ helping behaviors toward the Ukrainian refugees. Similar to the previous analyses (concerning personal or family implications), the results suggested significant differences related to the peritraumatic dissociative experiences and moral elevation. Participants who studied in schools that were involved in such actions (or their families’ implication; N = 18) reported higher peritraumatic dissociative experiences, t(88) = −3.75, p < 0.001, and higher moral elevation, t(88) = −3.63, p < 0.001. Significant differences (p = 0.05) were also found concerning parental threat perception, t(88) = −1.92, and anxiety, t(88) = −1.96; in both cases, the school’s involvement generated higher scores.
Discussion
The present study aimed to investigate Romanian adolescents’ psychological outcomes after the Russian – Ukrainian conflict outbreak.
Our results suggested that girls present higher perceived threat, anxiety, and moral elevation than boys, sustaining our assumption. Previous studies documented that female participants are more vulnerable to traumatic reactions (). However, in addition to these previous findings, the current results showed that girls are more vulnerable to negative outcomes (i.e., perceived threat, anxiety) but also present high moral elevation. Therefore, our results suggested that this adverse event generated intense negative reactions, but participants were still able to develop a positive emotional state triggered by witnessing a highly virtuous act of charity, compassion, or perseverance (McGuire and Mignogna, 2021).
Furthermore, our results showed that participants involved in volunteering/helping behaviors toward the Ukrainian refugees reported higher peritraumatic dissociative experiences (sustaining our assumption), and higher moral elevation compared with participants not involved in these types of behaviors. Participants that reported that their schools are implicated in volunteering behaviors reported more threat perception and anxiety than participants that did not report such behaviors. These results also confirmed the limited previous literature about the risk of secondary trauma among persons participating in humanitarian rescue operations () but also extended this literature by documenting the high probability of developing moral elevation, not only negative reactions.
We also assumed that more frequent discussions about the conflict would be associated with higher resilience through perceived social support. Our results suggested that more knowledge about Ukraine’s conflict relates to discussions about the war, more peritraumatic dissociative experiences, and more moral elevation. Threat perception was positively related to the perceived parental threat, peritraumatic dissociative experiences, and anxiety. Moreover, as expected, threat perception was negatively related to resilience. Furthermore, the reported peritraumatic dissociative experiences were significantly associated with social media engagement, moral elevation, and anxiety. Some of these relations (i.e., dissociation, anxiety, and resilience) sustain previous literature (e.g., ) and extend it by focusing on a less studied sample, i.e., adolescents. Also, an interesting result is represented by the positive association between social media engagement and anxiety symptoms, partially sustaining our last assumption. Although social media may be a source of information, it could also increase the vulnerability to unwanted emotional states, like anxiety symptoms.
The results of the present study can be targeted in interventions designed to increase adolescents’ resilience during difficult times. Paying attention to distressing emotional states in the present could prevent unwanted future long-term consequences for mental health. Addressing and increasing the positive emotions generated by moral elevation could also be a way to improve mental health among persons indirectly exposed to traumatic life events. Moreover, parents could be encouraged to discuss with their children and monitor their media exposure to protect children and adolescents during these times.
When interpreting these results, several limitations should be considered. First, our limited sample size impedes us from generalizing the results to a larger population, but offer us a limited picture of how Romanian teenagers might perceive the current context generated by the Russian – Ukraine conflict and may be expanded in future research. Second, we cannot identify causal relations between variables, given the cross-sectional nature of our study. Thus, prospective longitudinal studies with more time waves would help us to assess how emotional reactions toward the current context evolve in time. Next, our measures were self-reported, increasing the chances of desirability. Finally, we used two constructed items for moral elevation and not a specific scale, an issue that further studies might address using experimental approaches.
In order to further explore the risk and protective factors for adolescents’ mental health of exposure to war trauma, future studies should consider how personal factors (e.g., trait resilience, moral elevation) interact with event-specific factors (e.g., discussion about the war, knowledge about the conflict) in predicting states of anxiety and dissociation. Furthermore, it might be possible that, during these rough times, adolescents exposed to acts of goodwill (such as helping the refugees) might strengthen their moral identity, which is crucial considering the high pressure of war-related unpredictability. However, these assumptions need further exploration in subsequent research. Future research could also consider the role of school (i.e., teachers, peers) and family support in shaping adolescents’ reactions to difficult situations.
Conclusion
In conclusion, the current results suggested that girls presented a higher perceived threat, anxiety, and moral elevation than boys. Moreover, participants involved in helping behaviors toward Ukrainian refugees might be more vulnerable to unwanted outcomes, such as higher peritraumatic dissociative experiences, threat perception, and anxiety symptoms. The present study also showed that anxiety is positively related to the discussion about conflict, peritraumatic dissociation, and social media engagement, while the relation with resilience is negative. Future studies are needed to identify moderator variables and to explain additional mechanisms regarding the emotional outcomes of indirect exposure to armed conflicts.
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Statements
Data availability statement
The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article will be made available by the authors, without undue reservation.
Ethics statement
The studies involving human participants were reviewed and approved by Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, “Alexandru Ioan Cuza” University (Iasi, Romania). The patients/participants provided their written informed consent to participate in this study.
Author contributions
All authors listed have made a substantial, direct, and intellectual contribution to the work and approved it for publication.
Acknowledgments
Authors are thankful to Romanian Ministry of Research, Innovation and Digitization, within Program 1 – Development of the national RD system, Subprogram 1.2 – Institutional Performance – RDI excellence funding projects, Contract no.11PFE/30.12.2021, for financial support.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Supplementary material
The Supplementary material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1051152/full#supplementary-material
References
1
AlgoeS. B.HaidtJ. (2009). Witnessing excellence in action: the ‘other-praising’ emotions of elevation, gratitude, and admiration. J. Posit. Psychol.4, 105–127. doi: 10.1080/17439760802650519
2
AnghelR. G.TrandafoiuR. (2022). A glimpse of humanity: how Romanians have mobilized to help Ukrainian refugees. EUROPP–European politics and policy or the London school of Economics. Available at: https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/europpblog/2022/03/08/a-glimpse-of-humanity-how-romanians-have-mobilised-to-help-ukrainian-refugees/
3
ArmourC.ElhaiJ. D.LayneC. M.ShevlinM.Duraković-BelkoE.DjapoN.et al. (2011). Gender differences in the factor structure of posttraumatic stress disorder symptoms in war-exposed adolescents. J. Anxiety Disord.25, 604–611. doi: 10.1016/j.janxdis.2011.01.010
4
AzoulayE.CariouA.BruneelF.DemouleA.KouatchetA.ReuterD.et al. (2020). Symptoms of anxiety, depression, and Peritraumatic dissociation in critical care clinicians managing patients with COVID-19. A cross-sectional study. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.202, 1388–1398. doi: 10.1164/rccm.202006-2568OC
5
BirmaherB.BrentD. A.ChiappettaL.BridgeJ.MongaS.BaugherM. (1999). Psychometric properties of the screen for child anxiety related emotional disorders (SCARED): a replication study. J. Am. Acad. Child Adolesc. Psychiatry38, 1230–1236. doi: 10.1097/00004583-199910000-00011
6
Brajša-ŽganecA. (2005). The long-term effects of war experiences on children’s depression in the Republic of Croatia. Child Abuse & Neglect29, 31–43. HYPERLINK “https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1016/j.chiabu.2004.07.007“https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2004.07.007
7
BreslauN.ChilcoatH. D.KesslerR. C.DavisG. C. (1999). Previous exposure to trauma and PTSD effects of subsequent trauma: results from the Detroit area survey of trauma. Am. J. Psychiatr.156, 902–907. doi: 10.1176/ajp.156.6.902
8
BronnerM. B.KayserA.-M.KnoesterH.BosA. P.LastB. F.GrootenhuisM. A. (2009). A pilot study on peritraumatic dissociation and coping styles as risk factors for posttraumatic stress, anxiety and depression in parents after their child’s unexpected admission to a pediatric intensive care unit. Child Adolesc. Psychiatry Ment. Health3:33. doi: 10.1186/1753-2000-3-33
9
BulutS.DoğanU.AltundağY. (2013). Adolescent Psychological Resilience Scale: Validity and Reliability Study (Ergen Psikolojik Sağlamlık Ölçeği: Geçerlik ve Güvenirlik Çalışması). Suvremena psihologija16, 21–32.
10
CadierA.LabbéC.PadoveseV.PozziG.BadiliniS.SchmidR.et al. (2022). War Tok: TikTok is feeding war disinformation to new users within minutes—Even if they don’t search for Ukraine-related content. Available at: https://www.newsguardtech.com/misinformation-monitor/march-2022/
11
CaskaC. M.RenshawK. D. (2013). Personality traits as moderators of the associations between deployment experiences and PTSD symptoms in OEF/OIF service members. Anxiety, Stress & Coping26, 36–51. doi: 10.1080/10615806.2011.638053
12
ChaykaK. (2022). Watching the World’s “first TikTok war”. Available at: https://www.newyorker.com/culture/infinite-scroll/watching-the-worlds-first-tiktok-war
13
de Matos BrasilA.de OliveiraE. G.MacedoL.LuzD.CândidoE. L.de Moura GabrielI. W.et al. (2022). "between the cross and the sword": Brazilian children face an influenza epidemic while still dealing with the COVID-19 pandemic. J. Pediatr. Nurs.65, e24–e25. doi: 10.1016/j.pedn.2021.12.030
14
Duagani MasikaY.LeysC.Matonda-Ma-NzuziT.BlanchetteI.Miezi S.M. M.KornreichC. (2019). Peritraumatic dissociation and post-traumatic stress disorder in individuals exposed to armed conflict in the Democratic Republic of Congo. Journal of trauma & dissociation: the official journal of the International Society for the Study of Dissociation (ISSD)20, 582–593. doi: 10.1080/15299732.2019.1597814
15
DuncanE.DorahyM. J.HannaD.BagshawS.BlampiedN. (2013). Psychological responses after a major, fatal earthquake: the effect of peritraumatic dissociation and posttraumatic stress symptoms on anxiety and depression. J. Trauma & Dissociation: the official journal of the International Society for the Study of Dissociation (ISSD)14, 501–518. doi: 10.1080/15299732.2013.769479
16
EdwardT. R.RizziA. T.SimonA.MoroM. R. (2020). La transmission parents-enfants liée à la guerre civile du Sri Lanka [study on parent-to-child transmission related to Sri Lanka's civil war]. Soins. Pediatrie, puericulture41, 29–31. doi: 10.1016/j.spp.2020.02.007
17
EricksonT. M.AbelsonJ. L. (2012). Even the downhearted may be uplifted: moral elevation in the daily life of clinically depressed and anxious adults. J. Soc. Clin. Psychol.31, 707–728. doi: 10.1521/jscp.2012.31.7.707
18
EricksonT. M.McGuireA. P.ScarsellaG. M.CrouchT. A.LewisJ. A.EisenlohrA. P.et al. (2017). Viral videos and virtue: moral elevation inductions shift affect and interpersonal goals in daily life. J. Posit. Psychol.1–12, 1–12. doi: 10.1080/17439760.2017.1365163
19
FayyadJ.Cordahi-TabetC.YeretzianJ.SalamounM.NajmC.KaramE. G. (2017). Resilience-promoting factors in war-exposed adolescents: an epidemiologic study. Eur. Child Adolesc. Psychiatry26, 191–200. doi: 10.1007/s00787-016-0871-0
20
GeorgeD.MalleryM. (2010). SPSS for windows step by step: A simple guide and reference, 17.0 update (10a ed). Boston: Pearson.
21
Gonçalves JúniorJ.de AmorimL. M.NetoM.UchidaR. R.de MouraA.LimaN. (2022). The impact of "the war that drags on" in Ukraine for the health of children and adolescents: old problems in a new conflict?Child Abuse Negl.128:105602. doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2022.105602
22
HăisanA.MăireanC.LupuşoruS. I.TărniceriuC.CimpoeşuD. (2022). General health among eastern Romanian emergency medicine personnel during the Russian–Ukrainian armed conflict. Healthcare10:1976. doi: 10.3390/healthcare10101976
23
HambletonR. K.LiS. (2005). “Translation and adaptation issues and methods for educational and psychological tests,” in Comprehensive handbook of multicultural school psychology. eds. FrisbyC. L.ReynoldsC. R. (New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc), 881–903.
24
HavanaO. (2022). Photos: Romanians jump into action for Ukrainian refugees. Available at: https://www.aljazeera.com/gallery/2022/4/14/photos-russia-ukraine-war-refugees-romania
25
JawaidA.GomolkaM.TimmerA. (2022). Neuroscience of trauma and the Russian invasion of Ukraine. Nat. Hum. Behav.6, 748–749. doi: 10.1038/s41562-022-01344-4
26
KaramE. G.FayyadJ.KaramA. N.MelhemN.MneimnehZ.DimassiH.et al. (2014). Outcome of depression and anxiety after war: a prospective epidemiologic study of children and adolescents. J. Trauma. Stress.27, 192–199. doi: 10.1002/jts.21895
27
Kim-CohenJ. (2007). Resilience and developmental psychopathology. Child Adolesc. Psychiatr. Clin. N. Am.16, 271–283. doi: 10.1016/j.chc.2006.11.003
28
LoBueV.RakisonD. H.DeLoacheJ. S. (2010). Threat perception across the life span: evidence for multiple converging pathways. Curr. Dir. Psychol. Sci.19, 375–379. doi: 10.1177/0963721410388801
29
MăireanC. (2016). The relationship between secondary traumatic stress and personal posttraumatic growth: personality factors as moderators. J. Adult Dev.23, 120–128. doi: 10.1007/s10804-016-9228-7
30
MăireanC.ZancuA. S.Diaconu-GherasimL. R. (2022). Children’s anxiety, academic self-efficacy, and intergenerational transmission of worries regarding the transition to middle school. Br. J. Educ. Psychol.92, 1638–1650. doi: 10.1111/bjep.12530
31
MarmarC. R.WeissD. S.MetzlerT. J. (1997). “The Peritraumatic Dissociative Experiences Questionnaire” in Assessing psychological trauma and PTSD. eds. WilsonJ. P.KeaneT. M. (The Guilford Press), 412–428.
32
MarcianoH.EshelY.KimhiS.AdiniB. (2022). Hope and Fear of Threats as Predictors of Coping with Two Major Adversities, the COVID-19 Pandemic and an Armed Conflict. International journal of environmental research and public health19:1123.
33
McGuireA. P.NosenE.LyonsJ. A. (2019). Benefits of moral elevation in veterans with PTSD and moral injury: a proposed theoretical framework and pilot study. Mil. Behav. Health7, 315–326. doi: 10.1080/21635781.2018.1540316
34
McGuireA. P.MignognaJ. (2021). Inducing moral elevation in veterans with PTSD: An experimental investigation using a mixed methods approach. Journal of Experimental Psychopathology12:2043808720982415. doi: 10.1177/2043808720982415
35
NiX.ShaoX.GengY.QuR.NiuG.WangY. (2020). Development of the social media engagement scale for adolescents. Front. Psychol.11:701. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00701
36
OliverM. B.HartmannT.WoolleyJ. K. (2012). Elevation in response to entertainment portrayals of moral virtue. Hum. Commun. Res.38, 360–378. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2958.2012.01427.x
37
OphirY.RosenbergH.AsterhanC. S.SchwarzB. B. (2016). In times of war, adolescents do not fall silent: teacher-student social network communication in wartime. J. Adolesc.46, 98–106. doi: 10.1016/j.adolescence.2015.11.005
38
PeltonenK.KangaslampiS.SaranpääJ.QoutaS.PunamäkiR. L. (2017). Peritraumatic dissociation predicts posttraumatic stress disorder symptoms via dysfunctional trauma-related memory among war-affected children. Eur. J. Psychotraumatol.8:1375828. doi: 10.1080/20008198.2017.1375828
39
PlomeckaM. B.GobbiS.NeckelsR.RadzińskiP.SkórkoB.LazzeriS.JawaidA. (2020). Mental Health Impact of COVID-19: A global study of risk and resilience factors. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/zj6b4
40
PereiraP.BašićF.BogunovicI.BarceloD. (2022). Russian-Ukrainian war impacts the total environment. Science of the Total Envirnoment837:155865. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.155865
41
RonenT.SeemanA. (2007). Subjective well being of adolescents in boarding schools under threat of war. J. Trauma. Stress.20, 1053–1062. doi: 10.1002/jts.20248
42
RousseauD. L.Garcia-RetameroR. (2007). Identity, power, and threat perception: a cross-national experimental study. J. Confl. Resolut.51, 744–771. doi: 10.1177/0022002707304813
43
SchauerM.ElbertT. (2010). Dissociation following traumatic stress: etiology and treatment. Zeitschrift für Psychologie/J. Psychology218, 109–127. doi: 10.1027/0044-3409/a000018
44
ShamaiM.KimhiS. (2006). Exposure to threat of war and terror, political attitudes, stress, and life satisfaction among teenagers in Israel. J. Adolesc.29, 165–176. doi: 10.1016/j.adolescence.2005.03.003
45
ShamaiM.KimhiS. (2007). Teenagers response to threat of war and terror: gender and the role of social systems. Community Ment. Health J.43, 359–374. doi: 10.1007/s10597-006-9080-5
46
TingeyJ. L.McGuireA. P.StebbinsO. L.EricksonT. M. (2017). Moral elevation and compassionate goals predict posttraumatic growth in the context of a college shooting. J. Posit. Psychol.14, 261–270. doi: 10.1080/17439760.2017.1402077
47
TolW. A.SongS.JordansM. J. (2013). Annual Research Review: Resilience and mental health in children and adolescents living in areas of armed conflict--a systematic review of findings in low- and middle-income countries. Journal of child psychology and psychiatry, and allied disciplines54, 445–460. doi: 10.1111/jcpp.12053
48
Van de VyverJ.AbramsD. (2015). Testing the prosocial effectiveness of the prototypical moral emotions: elevation increases benevolent behaviors and outrage increases justice behaviors. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol.58, 23–33. doi: 10.1016/j.jesp.2014.12.005
49
WernerE. E. (2012). Children and war: risk, resilience, and recovery. Dev. Psychopathol.24, 553–558. doi: 10.1017/S0954579412000156
50
YangX. Y.GongR. N.SassineS.MorsaM.TchognaA. S.DrouinO.et al. (2020). Risk perception of COVID-19 infection and adherence to preventive measures among adolescents and young adults. Children (Basel, Switzerland)7:311. doi: 10.3390/children7120311
51
ZhengL.ZhuY.JiangR. (2019). The mediating role of moral elevation in cause-related marketing: a moral psychological perspective. J. Bus. Ethics156, 439–454. doi: 10.1007/s10551-017-3614-3
Summary
Keywords
war, Ukraine, adolescents, emotional outcomes, anxiety, resilience
Citation
Maftei A, Dănilă O and Măirean C (2022) The war next-door—A pilot study on Romanian adolescents’ psychological reactions to potentially traumatic experiences generated by the Russian invasion of Ukraine. Front. Psychol. 13:1051152. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1051152
Received
22 September 2022
Accepted
08 November 2022
Published
05 December 2022
Volume
13 - 2022
Edited by
Mona Vintilă, West University of Timișoara, Romania
Reviewed by
Otilia I. Tudorel, West University of Timișoara, Romania; Adelina Mihaela Ştefănuţ, West University of Timișoara, Romania
Updates
Copyright
© 2022 Maftei, Dănilă and Măirean.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Cornelia Măirean, cornelia.mairean@uaic.ro
This article was submitted to Health Psychology, a section of the journal Frontiers in Psychology
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.