ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Psychol., 08 September 2022

Sec. Organizational Psychology

Volume 13 - 2022 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.972556

A survey of college students’ willingness to participate in social practice with perceived environmental support based on the applied mixed research method

  • 1. College of Educational Science and Technology, Zhejiang University of Technology, Hangzhou, China

  • 2. College of Science and Technology, Ningbo University, Cixi, Zhejiang, China

Abstract

Contemporary social reform promotes rapid social transformation, and social practice has a special educational function in higher education. However, research shows weak willingness to participate in social practice among college students. Using the mixed research method, 438 completed questionnaire surveys on perceived environmental support were collected from college students. The influence of perceived environmental support on Chinese college students’ willingness to participate in social practice was analyzed using partial least squares structural equation modeling, and an empirical test was conducted. The findings are as follows: (1) Perceived environmental support significantly impacts students’ participation attitude and perceived behavioral control. (2) Participation attitude and perceived behavioral control significantly influence participation intention, but behavioral norms have no significant influence. (3) Participation intention and perceived behavioral control significantly influence actual behavior. This study provides the theoretical basis of perceived environmental support for future research on social practice participation intention and offers some theoretical guidance for the implementation of social practice in China.

Introduction

Presently, social reform is promoting rapid social transformation, and social practice activities have undergone drastic changes in terms of mode and communication (Zheng and Yang, 2006). In China, in 2017, the Outline of Curriculum Guidance for Comprehensive Practical Activities in Primary and Secondary Schools established that comprehensive practical activities are compulsory courses stipulated by national compulsory education and ordinary high school curriculum programs. In Singapore, civic education emphasizes the concept of the unity of knowledge and action and upholds the educational principle of integrating theory with practice (). In the United States, the service learning model, which closely approximates social practice, is used to strengthen the effectiveness of school social practice (). In Japan, social education is defined as an organized off-campus educational activity that undertakes lifelong education for adults after school education (). In the United Kingdom, citizenship education is summarized under three themes: community participation, political literacy, and moral responsibility (). In Canada, university teachers require students to write reflection reports and engage in self-reflection and self-education through practical activities (). In today’s era, social practice, as a kind of social activity conducive to college learning and personal development (Zhao et al., 2005), has become an important means to promote the socialization of college students in various countries and regions around the world (), and it is an important part of college students’ quality-oriented education.

The existent problems in social practice have seriously affected the development of the educational role of social practice (Yao and Shi, 2016). Paul (2017) has pointed out that social practice faces the problem of utilitarianism in the value orientation of participation. Once students achieve their own goals through the benefits and value obtained from participating in social practice, they tend to discontinue their participation in social practice and may even approach it perfunctorily (Shaw and Reyes, 1992; Yang, 2015). pointed out that some students have a bad attitude when they participate in social practice. noted the lack of innovation regarding the specific content and form of social practice; Zupic and Čater (2015) asserted that the organization and management of social practice are unscientific, and Van Der Wiele (1995) pointed out that when the content and form of social practice are not innovative or its upper-level organization and management are unscientific and not properly arranged, students’ interest in learning and enthusiasm for participation will be greatly reduced, ultimately lowering their willingness to participate. These conditions, in turn, further stimulate students’ rebellious psychology toward social practice (Xu et al., 2016), manifesting a mental and spiritual burden () and resulting in the inactivation of students’ willingness to participate in social practice. Therefore, we use the theoretical framework of the theory of planned behavior (TPB) to explain the influence on college students’ intention to participate in social practice from the perspective of perceived environmental support.

This study believes that environmental support, as an influencing factor to promote students’ social practice participation behavior, can better explain students’ social practice participation intention and perceived behavioral control (PBC). According to past studies, tacit knowledge and experience are embedded in specific social groups and social situations and are related to environmental support and environmental management in social practice (). In contrast to traditional individualistic and rationalist behavioral approaches, social practice is collective-centered, and it helps individuals realize perceptions, interpretations, and actions in social environments (). showed that teacher support in social practice is related to students’ participation and sense of achievement. found that organizational management and organizational culture are important factors affecting the success of social practice activities. Saye and Brush (1999) used information technology to support students’ participation in social issues in the learning environment, strengthen students’ practical experience, and enhance students’ participation behavior.

According to the existing research, environmental support is an important factor to promote participation in social practice behavior. Regarding previous research on social practice, domestic and foreign research is mostly limited to the content of social practice; that is, it mainly discusses the logical structure (), the core composition, and the value embodiment of social practice (Wang, 2005; ), etc., while research on students’ willingness to participate in social practice is non-existent. Based on the TPB (), Rhodes and Courneya (2005) found that attitude, subjective norms, and PBC were linearly correlated with students’ intentions and behaviors. Also based on the TPB, Yean et al. (2015) confirmed that attitude, subjective norms, and PBC can affect individuals’ subjective intentions. Vosgerau and Newen (2007) pointed out that thought can trigger action, and individual subjective will plays a key role in influencing individual behavior. Therefore, this study focused on the perspective of perceived environmental support (), screened out the indicators of influencing factors of perceived environmental support and willingness to participate, and demonstrated the related influencing factors through a questionnaire survey to explain the influence of different factors on college students’ intention to participate in social practice. In sum, this study answers the following questions:

  • 1.

    Which methods should teachers and schools use to enhance students’ willingness to participate in social practice?

  • 2.

    Does students’ willingness to participate in social practice differ because of different attitudes, subjective norms, and perceived behavioral control?

  • 3.

    Does students’ perceived environmental support vary according to the degree of support they receive from teachers, organizational management, and environmental facilities?

  • 4.

    Does students’ actual behavior differ due to individual variance in perceived behavioral control?

Literature review

Theory of planned behavior

The TPB is an important theory in social psychology to explain and predict individual behavior. The core idea of this theory is that the individual’s subjective will plays a key role in influencing their behavior. The TPB has been widely used to explain and predict all kinds of behaviors. , the theory’s author, presented it as comprising three parts. The first is personal attitude toward behavior, where “attitude” refers to the actor’s determination of whether a certain behavior is personally beneficial or disadvantageous. Secondly, subjective norms represent third parties’ normative expectations, that is, how the people who are important to the actor expects them to behave (Rueda Barrios et al., 2022), including but not limited to family members, teachers, friends, etc.; common views on certain behaviors also positively impact individual behavior intentions (). Finally, PBC is understood as the perceived ease or difficulty of performing a behavior. The relevant research on the TPB is shown in Table 1.

TABLE 1

ReferencesResearch backgroundIndependent variablesDependent variableBasic theory
Online learningSubjective norms, behavioral control, self-esteem, perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and attitudeContinuous use intentionTechnology acceptance model (TAM) + TPB
College students’ entrepreneurshipEntrepreneurial intentions, attitudes toward entrepreneurs, subjective norms, perceived behavioral control, personality traits, personal values, and habitsSustainable entrepreneurial intentEntrepreneurial event model (EEM) + TPB
Shukri et al., 2022Traffic behaviorAttitudes, subjective norms, perceived behavioral control, ethics, past violations, history of traffic accidents, and psychological stressIntention to avoid violating traffic regulationsTPB
Wang et al., 2021Secondary vocational school students’ further educationAttitudes, subjective norms, perceived behavioral control, and genderWillingness to pursue further educationTPB
Skoglund et al., 2020Lecture attendanceAttitudes, subjective norms, and perceived behavioral controlWillingness to attend lecturesTPB
Students’ course selectionAttitudes, subjective norms, perceived behavioral control, and genderWillingness to take social science coursesTPB + gender orientation theory
Summers, 2021Elective coursesBackground variables, behavioral beliefs, personal attitudes, subjective norms, and perceived behavioral controlWillingness to take science coursesTPB

Research on the theory of planned behavior (TPB).

Rueda Barrios et al. (2022) conducted an in-depth study on sustainable entrepreneurship intentions among college students in northeast Colombia based on the TPB. Shukri et al. (2022) used the TPB to explain why drivers violate traffic rules. Attitudes are divided into cognitive and emotional attitudes, subjective norms are divided into prohibitive and descriptive norms, and PBC is considered to be composed of perceived difficulty and self-efficacy. Additionally, the research team successfully explained the causes of traffic rule violations by combining the TPB with moral norms and psychological stressors. Therefore, regarding participation attitude, this study includes students’ cognitive attitude toward social practice () as well as their emotional attitude (), and regarding subjective norms, this study includes prohibitive norms proposed by schools and teachers for social practice (e.g., during the novel coronavirus pandemic, cross-province mobility and the offline gathering of practice team members are prohibited) and descriptive norms (e.g., encouraging students to engage in environmental governance, science popularization, social research, development planning, and other community activities).

Presently, although the TPB is mainly used in the field of health care, many scholars have applied it to education. For instance, Skoglund et al. (2020) used the TPB to evaluate the factors that influence PharmD students’ willingness to attend lectures. Those scholars pointed out that the three components that influence behavioral intentions are further explained by three beliefs: Behavioral beliefs explain attitude, normative beliefs explain subjective norms, and control beliefs explain PBC. combined “past behavior” and “identity” with the TPB when studying male students’ low willingness to choose social science courses, especially considering the influence of gender on their intention to study the social sciences. Summers (2021) conducted a survey on “behavior, related attitudes and prejudice against science,” using the TPB and a mixed method design to explain the gap between reported intentions and middle school students’ actual enrollment in elective science courses.

Therefore, the TPB is adopted in this study as the main research framework, the primary reason being that the TPB has provided an appropriate theoretical basis for educators in previous studies, and it exerts an important impact on the formation of students’ participation behaviors. The second reason is that participation in social practice is a planned behavior. Without proper planning, social practice cannot be smoothly executed. However, the TPB can explain and predict individual behavior.

Perceived environmental support

Perceived environmental support includes three main aspects: teacher behavior support (), organization and management support (), and support from environmental facilities ().

Firstly, regarding teacher behavior support, in recent years, it has gradually been established that certain teacher behavior is conducive to improving teaching design (Sergis and Sampson, 2017), aiding teaching and learning (), and enhancing students’ interest in learning as well as their learning efficiency (Wang et al., 2020). The sequencing pedagogical structure (SPS) framework indicates that teachers’ guiding role in the teaching process can be a means of implementing the student-centered teaching philosophy and can improve the structural teaching sequence (). Suldo et al. (2009) applied mixed research methods and found that teacher support in social practice can improve adolescents’ subjective well-being and give full play to the supporting role of teacher behavior in social practice.

Secondly, regarding organizational management support, effective forms of teaching organization need to be adapted to suit teaching objectives and teaching content (Winslow, 1996). pointed out that fragmented communication, resource limitations, and inappropriate evaluation hinder the smooth progress of activities and the improvement of teachers’ teaching. believes that the proper organization and management of activities is the fundamental factor that affects the “kernel of educational practice.” found that perceived environmental support mediates the relationship between human resource management and organizational commitment as well as that between student-specific practice and school macro guidance in social practice. Organization and management support includes agenda setting, transportation arrangements, social practice management measures, etc., which are necessary to improve the robustness and security of the platform (Xia, 2020) in order to improve the learning effect on as well as the motivation and satisfaction of learners ().

Finally, regarding support from environmental facilities, it is important to note that social practice is part of the learning environment. With face-to-face or virtual access to learning materials, students can engage in learning activities and evaluate the learning process (Yousafzai et al., 2016). Research has proven that a good teaching environment can deepen students’ interest in learning, promote their engagement in cognitive and psychological activities during the learning process, and improve students’ behavioral intentions (). Smith and Hardaker (2000) realized innovation in distance learning in the Internet-based learning environment, promoted students’ personalized development, and used the transferability of learning technologies and methods to support social practice. helped students adapt to the technology-supported learning environment by improving learning motivation and student participation. Social practice learning is special because the learning environment is not limited to school. Learners can learn anytime and anywhere through social practice (), and they can also obtain a variety of learning materials () from the environment, while possibly cultivating various abilities and seeing improvement ().

Social practice, as a medium connecting schools and society, plays an important role in promoting students’ development (). Presently, there are many objective evaluation methods to encourage college students to participate in social practice, but to get students more actively involved in social practice—-specifically, to encourage college students to participate in social practice activities linked to their study intentions—-it is also necessary to explore issues related to and collect and analyze students’ perceptions of environmental support for their achievements. In the literature, there are few TPB-based studies that explore college students’ intentions to participate in social practice activities. Therefore, to fill this theoretical gap, the concept of perceived environmental support is used in this study as a pre-factor affecting manifestation of the TPB.

Research model and hypothesis

Research model

In a research situation where college students are required to participate in social practice, the proposed research framework to understand the influence of the TPB on social practice participation intentions is diagrammatically represented in Figure 1.

FIGURE 1

Research hypothesis

Participation intention

The main elements of the TPB are attitude toward participation, subjective norms, and PBC. According to the TPB, these three elements directly impact individuals’ participation intentions. When students have a positive attitude toward participation and the support of important people () such as teachers, family members, partners, etc., the combination positively impacts their social practice participation, as well as students’ belief that social practice is valuable and easy to accomplish, which can produce positive PBC, all of which, in turn, may positively impact students’ participation intentions. Additionally, students with strong personal abilities have stronger PBC and are more likely to have positive participation intentions.

According to the TPB, the expected effect of personal attitude on behavior and the perceived effect of these expectations will affect the result of behavior (). A person’s attitude toward the occurrence of individual behavior and the corresponding results is called their behavioral attitude, which is mainly divided into two parts: One is belief intensity, and the other is evaluation of the results of the behavior (Zsóka et al., 2013). The connotation of the former refers to the degree of clarity regarding the behavior. The greater the belief intensity, the more positive the participation attitude. The latter refers to subjective estimation of the consequences and influences of the actions to be taken. The higher the individual’s expectation of success as a result of performing the behavior or the more severe the estimation of its consequences, the more positive or negative the individual’s attitude toward participation, respectively. These two components combined affect the individual’s participation attitude. Based on the above discussion, this study proposes Hypotheses 1–3:

H1: Participation attitude has a positive influence on participation intention.

H2: Subjective norms have a positive impact on participation intention.

H3: Perceived behavioral control has a positive impact on participation intention.

Environmental support

and others have asserted that learning attitude is students’ relatively stable psychological tendency to engage in learning and with their learning situations. Students’ attitudes are a key factor to cultivate more and better learning and improve their academic performance, while a good learning environment is crucial to maintaining students’ positive attitude (Ruiz-Jiménez et al., 2022). PBC reflects both internal and external factors () and depends on the resources and opportunities available at a given time. The higher an individual’s dependence on their environment, the lower their behavioral control (). Based on the above discussion, this study proposes Hypotheses 5 and 6:

H5: Environmental support has a positive impact on participation attitude.

H6: Environmental support has a positive impact on perceived behavioral control.

Actual behavior

Dialectical materialism holds that practice is the foundation of cognition, and cognition negatively affects practice. Social practice has reformed the higher education teaching process regarding aspects of its influence on educational practice (). Some scholars have researched environmental behavior and awareness (). For instance, Uzun and Keles (2012) studied the relationship between environmental awareness and behavior, and Zsóka et al. (2013) studied Hungarian students’ environment, attitudes, and behavior. Conscious behavior is rooted in perception (), and the expression of behavioral awareness needs to be controlled through perception. Based on the above discussion, this study proposes Hypotheses 4 and 7:

H4: Perceived behavioral control has a positive influence on actual behavior.

H7: Participation intention has a positive influence on actual behavior.

Questionnaire design

This study drew upon the TPB to design a questionnaire, with reference to the extant literature (; ; ). The questionnaire contains nine questions concerning perceived environmental support. Scale design follows and other relevant literature. Perceived environmental support is composed of three main second-order sub-facets, with the following question distribution: three questions on teacher behavior support, three questions on organization and management support, and three questions on support from environmental facilities. Secondly, the TPB was applied according to scale. The questionnaire includes three questions each on participation attitude, subjective norms, PCB, participation intention, and actual action.

Before questionnaire administration, this study conducted a pilot test to improve the questionnaire’s content validity by avoiding ambiguity and inappropriate questions. A total of 231 people participated in the pilot test. Cronbach’s α for internal consistency was used to perform reliability analysis of the questionnaire’s indicators. The results show that the Cronbach’s α values for all indicators exceeded 0.7. Regarding the pilot test, the Cronbach’s α values were between 0.757 and 0.956, and the standard values exceeded 0.7. Therefore, the questionnaire was deemed fit to be distributed.

Data analysis

Data collection

To verify the influence of perceived environmental support on students’ willingness to participate in social practice, this study administered a questionnaire survey to college and university students who participated in social practice activities and possessed a certain level of knowledge as well as logical discrimination ability in 2022. A total of 452 questionnaires were collected through the Questionnaire Star system (WJX). Following , , and Su et al. (2021), the questionnaire took at least 3 min to complete, and completed questionnaires were treated as invalid if responses to items were identical or in cases where extreme answers were provided. Fourteen invalid responses that were traced to duplicate login accounts and/or were completed in less than 30 s were deleted, resulting in 438 valid questionnaires, which were used for data analysis.

Regarding the respondents’ demographic characteristics, there were 233 male and 205 female respondents. Among these, 149 were liberal arts students, 134 were science students, and 155 were engineering students. Regarding level of study, 281 undergraduate and 157 graduate students participated in the questionnaire survey, accounting for 64.2 and 35.8% of the total number of respondents, respectively. Among them, the northern region sample numbered 123, accounting for 64.2% of the total number of questionnaires, while the southern region sample numbered 245, accounting for 54.20%; the northwest China sample numbered 47, accounting for 10.40%; and the Qinghai-Tibet area sample numbered 23, accounting for 5.09%. Statistical tabulation of respondents’ basic personal information is shown in Table 2.

TABLE 2

AttributeGroupNumber of peoplePercentage of total sample
GenderMale23353.20%
Female20546.80%
Level of studyFreshman6414.61%
Sophomore7116.21%
Junior7817.81%
Senior6815.53%
Grade 1 master’s6113.93%
Grade 2 master’s6314.38%
Grade 3 master’s184.11%
Doctorate153.42%
Area of studyLiberal arts14934.02%
Science13430.59%
Engineering15535.39%
RegionNorthern China12327.21%
Southern China24554.20%
Northwest China4710.40%
Qinghai-Xizang235.09%

Summary of respondents’ demographic characteristics.

Data analysis

This model examines the relationship between latent and explicit variables, and therefore, confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was used to explore the questionnaire’s reliability. CFA is a mainstream analytical approach that includes factor loading, Cronbach’s alpha, composite reliability (CR), and average variance extracted (AVE). First, this study examined the factor loadings of the corresponding questionnaire items in SmartPLS. Normally, standardized factor loadings are higher, and the value must exceed 0.7 (). The results of the factor loadings in the present study are shown in Table 3, with all factor loadings exceeding 0.7; therefore, each measured item exhibited good structural validity.

TABLE 3

VariableMeasurementFactor loadingT
Teacher behavior supportTB10.89448.402
TB20.76747.747
TB30.76438.71
Organization and management supportOM10.92256.369
OM20.89153.366
OM30.88957.354
Support from environmental facilitiesEF10.86459.323
EF20.81559.35
EF30.82152.702
Perceived environmental supportPE10.82359.244
PE20.87745.151
PE30.85346.225
Participation attitudePA10.80051.153
PA20.84138.349
PA30.88643.555
Subjective normsSN10.82941.589
SN20.85549.556
SN30.86050.506
Perceived behavioral controlPB10.82357.867
PB20.80350.165
PB30.83758.358
Participation intentionPI10.85059.013
PI20.85556.4
PI30.81252.878
Actual behaviorAA10.85149.751
AA20.87864.521
AA30.88452.599

Results of factor analysis.

proposed that the reliability of internal consistency should be evaluated according to two indicators, namely composite reliability and Cronbach’s alpha, both of which should exceed 0.7. Table 4 shows that all the comprehensive reliability values exceeded 0.70, indicating good internal consistency. Combined reliability (CR) refers to the reliability of a combined variable (a new variable comprising the sum of more than one variable), and the value is required to surpass 0.5 (). proposed that AVE is an indicator of the dispersion between statistical sampling value and expected value. According to the recommendations in the literature, AVE should exceed 0.5. Table 4 shows that in the present study, all AVE values exceeded 0.5, indicating perfect convergence validity.

TABLE 4

VariableCronbach’s alpharho_ACRAVE
Subjective norms0.8060.8090.8850.719
Participation attitude0.7950.80.880.711
Participation intention0.790.7930.8770.704
Actual behavior0.8410.8410.9040.759
Perceived environmental support0.8090.8120.8870.724
Teacher support0.7370.7550.8510.657
Environmental support0.7820.7880.8720.695
Perceived behavioral control0.7590.7590.8610.674
Organization and management support0.8840.8850.9280.811

Reliability and validity analysis results – CR, Cronbach’s alpha, and AVE.

The purpose of discriminant validity is to test the degree of discrimination between different constructs. proposed that the square root of the AVE between different constructs should be greater than their correlation coefficient. In the correlation coefficient matrix for each construct, shown in Table 5, the diagonal is the square root of the AVE. As shown in Table 5, the square roots of the AVE values are all greater than the correlation coefficients between the constructs, indicating that the results for each construct have discriminant validity.

TABLE 5

Subjective normsParticipation attitudeParticipation intentionActual behaviorPerceived environmental supportTeacher supportEnvironmental supportPerceived behavioral controlOrganization and management support
Subjective norms0.848
Participation attitude0.6100.843
Participation intention0.5560.6850.839
Actual behavior0.6140.6160.7440.871
Perceived environmental support0.6980.7590.6320.6100.871
Teacher support0.5150.5180.5090.5420.5490.811
Environmental support0.4610.5400.4670.5890.4090.5210.834
Perceived behavioral control0.5760.5920.6320.6390.5610.5980.6610.821
Organization and management support0.3780.4660.4980.5770.4690.7910.7060.6450.901

Discriminant validity ().

proposed the heterotrait-monotrait (HTMT) correlation ratio to evaluate discriminant validity. Often used to assess discriminant validity, HTMT is a value generated by comparing the mean of each construct (based on uniform load) with its square uniform construct correlation. If the HTMT value is less than 0.90, discriminant validity exists between the two constructs. The maximum HTMT value in this study was 0.890. HTMT results showed that the student sample met all criteria. As shown in Table 6, this model has good reliability and validity.

TABLE 6

Subjective normsParticipation attitudeParticipation intentionActual behaviorPerceived environmental supportTeacher supportEnvironmental supportPerceived behavioral controlOrganization and management support
Subjective norms
Participation attitude0.766
Participation intention0.6930.867
Actual behavior0.7450.7540.811
Perceived environmental support0.8610.8430.7940.742
Teacher support0.6730.6800.6690.6960.705
Environmental support0.5770.6780.5810.7130.5060.710
Perceived behavioral control0.7360.7580.8100.7970.7130.8100.862
Organization and management support0.4600.5550.5920.6690.5550.8900.8580.787

Differential validity (HTMT).

Structural model

This study adopted the bootstrapping re-sampling method with 5,000 samples to evaluate partial least squares (PLS) regression results (). The results of the structural model are shown in Figure 2. Regarding individual constructs’ explanatory power, the R2 values for participation attitude, PCB, participation intention, actual behavior, and perceived environmental support were 57.7, 31.5, 55.6, 60.1, and 32.3%, respectively. This study can therefore be said to have a model with good explanatory power. In previous studies, under the TPB, the variance used to explain the influence of behavior was only 40–50%, and the explanatory power of the variance in behavior was even lower at only 19–38% (Sutton, 1998). Therefore, the present study’s framework has better explanatory power for intention to participate in social practice.

FIGURE 2

Regarding the results of verification of H1–H8, the statistical results for H1 and H4–H7 show support for these hypotheses. Among them, in the TPB, participation attitude (H1) and PCB (H3) significantly influence social practice participation intentions. Notably, subjective norms (H2) have no significant impact on entrepreneurial intention. Secondly, a significant relationship was found between perceived environmental support and participation attitude (H5) and PCB (H6); specifically, the coefficient for the influence of perceived environmental support on participation attitude was high (β = 0.759), but that of PCB was low (β = 0.561). Additionally, teacher support (β = 0.495) had a higher influence coefficient on perceived environmental support than organization and management support (β = 0.059) and support from environmental facilities (β = 0.193). Finally, both PCB (H4) and participation intention (H7) were found to significantly affect the actual behavior of participating in social practice.

Discussion and conclusion

Research discussion

The results of this study indicate that teacher support significantly impacts perceived environmental support, while organization and management support and that from environmental facilities exert no significant impact on perceived environmental support, and whether teachers effectively participate in social practice indirectly impacts students’ intention to participate (). Support from the surrounding environment that students can easily perceive in social practice comes from the teachers who guide social practice (); therefore, instructors’ initiative should be given full play in social practice (). When the instructors involved in social practice select a research direction that is suitable for their students, students’ intention to participate in social practice will improve.

This study also found that perceived environmental support significantly impacts participation attitude and PCB. When students perceive environmental support for their participation in social practice, they are more likely to have a positive attitude toward social practice participation () and be able to maintain their subjective attitude. However, it is worth noting that the influence of perceived environmental support on participation attitude is significantly stronger than that of PBC, which indicates that once students perceive external support, it is easier to maintain rather than change their original participation attitude.

The results also show that attitude and PBC significantly affect participation intention. The reason for this may be that students are more willing to participate in social practice when it reflects their interests () or when their behavioral beliefs are compatible with it. Therefore, to increase students’ willingness to participate in social practice, social practice content should be carefully selected, and students should be encouraged to communicate their beliefs and interests. A positive participation attitude may follow participation intentions, and students’ PBC can help maintain their participation intentions. On the contrary, students’ subjective norms cannot fundamentally change their intentions; subjective norms can only contribute to the habitual maintenance of students’ attitudes toward social practice (Van De Mieroop et al., 2021). If students’ attitudes toward social practice are negative, subjective norms will further deepen their ideological consciousness, nullifying their participation intentions.

Finally, PBC and participation intention significantly influence students’ practical action, suggesting that after social practice participation, students will be more willing to actually perform the action, will be capable of exercising self-control to avoid violating their personal behavioral code (), and will be able to maintain a certain level of understanding. The final stage of social practice should therefore give students full play regarding their participation, help students solidify their own thinking and understanding rather than encouraging a negative attitude toward social practice work, and through increased PBC, guide students to improve their own actual participation in social practice activities and work toward meeting their developmental needs.

In view of the above conclusions, we offer the following suggestions: (1) In terms of external support, instructors’ initiative should be given full play in social practice. (2) During the early stages, guide students to establish an appropriate attitude toward participating in social practice, encourage students to actively participate in social practice, and expose students such that they witness the knowledge and skills that social practice participation yields. (3) Regarding the content of activities, encourage students to communicate their beliefs and interests. (4) Regarding final participation, students’ willingness to participate should be given full play. Students should also be encouraged to adhere to their own ideas and understanding and guided to participate in social practice activities for their own improvement and to meet their developmental needs through improved PBC.

Practical and theoretical implications

Practical implications

Firstly, this study has referential significance for schools and educators regarding guiding students’ social practice. Through in-depth analysis of the theoretical model, this study answers the question “What influences students’ social practice participation intentions and actions?” (Wong and Hodson, 2010), which is pertinent because it represents a problem that higher education professionals are facing today. Relevant to present times, Tuomela (2002) recently explained social practice from the perspective of the mental state of social interweaving; Zheng and Wang (2010) observed that relevant workers in higher education are thoughtfully reflecting on strategies to improve the value of social practice; and emphasized promoting improved social practice quality through knowledge driving and purposeful efforts to improve personnel training quality and enhance the level of scientific research as well as the social service ability. Based on the results of this study, higher education professionals can target challenges in social practice, innovate the forms that college students’ social practice participation takes, enrich the connotations of social practice, and increase its value ().

Secondly, this study investigated students’ satisfaction with social practice, which can provide guidance for solving problems such as “students’ insufficient awareness level” () and their “negative mentality” (Yang, 2005) in their approach to social practice. pointed out that social practice is a better solution when students lack the knowledge to solve practical problems. adopted the cognitive system method to deduce teaching and learning theory from practice and carry out feasible teaching practice. pointed out that practice as an effective intervention can improve individuals’ and organizations’ learning performance. used social mindset theory () to verify that stronger and more numerous interpersonal relations are associated with higher levels of paranoia, attachment, and avoidance; Yuan-Qiang et al. (2019) asserted that positive social mentality can clarify the goal, mechanism, and mode of social practice; and pointed out that reducing the negative impact of excessive compassion and improving compassion satisfaction can better equip students to face social practice. Through teachers’ guidance, students can adjust their attitude and become more active, while deepening their understanding of the importance of social practice, so as to gain more from participation.

The purpose of studying the factors influencing social practice intentions and actions is to help college students “integrate into society” (Skop et al., 2021). Social practice is not only an important part of college students’ social integration but also an important component of tertiary education. advise that social practice should avoid geographical limitations and that its advantages should be given full play in the local and regional context to help students better integrate into society. believe that students’ social practice should be sustainably integrated into their socialization training, so as to form a mechanism combining science and practice. Thyer (2015) has encouraged students to integrate theoretical research into practical practice, as it eases employment in terms of convenience and helps students more quickly adapt to society after their studies. For both higher education professionals and students, this study aims to enhance social practice. College students’ participation in social practice is an important means of directly promoting their transition from school to society. Moreover, college students’ participation in social practice can deepen their understanding of industry, society, and nation.

Theoretical implications

This study experimentally expands and combines the TPB and the theory of perceived environmental support. The traditional TPB claims only that participation attitude and perceived behavioral norms will affect individuals’ behavioral intentions (); however, the influencing factors of participation attitude and perceived behavioral norms have not been thoroughly studied. In this study, an environmental support variable was incorporated into the theoretical framework in combination with the TPB to compensate for the deficiency.

Second, this study supplements the TPB in the field of education. Presently, the TPB’s main application is in health care (), and there are few studies linking it to education. It is important to study and offer guidance on students’ intentions to learn as well as their practice behaviors, and the TPB can be useful in such research (Sun, 2021). As a pre-factor of the TPB, perceived environmental support can better explain students’ intentions to participate in behavior in the field of education.

Limitations and future research

This study has some limitations and unresolved problems.

First, the impact of organization and management support and support from environmental facilities needs to be further clarified. This study concluded that perceived environmental support significantly impacts participation attitude and PBC, which indicates that it is beneficial to study the impact of environmental support on participation attitude. Humans’ social environment includes the physical environment, social relations, and the cultural environment (), and the interaction between social context and individual characteristics in the social practice development process should be fully considered (). However, among the influencing factors of environmental support, only teachers’ support plays a significant role, while organization and management support and support from environmental facilities do not have a direct and significant role. The dependent variables affecting perceived environmental support need to be studied further.

Second, it is necessary to explore the specific causes of the formulation of behavioral beliefs. Multiple factors affect behavior and belief (Shahi et al., 2020), including which are belief and intensity and the consequences of behavior (). However, studies have pointed out that behavioral beliefs play an important role in influencing behavior and participation intention in social practice (), subjective beliefs are crucial to behavioral reasoning (Sahu et al., 2020), and behavioral beliefs not only stimulate theoretical innovation but also provide behavioral meaning on the basis of facts (). Therefore, this aspect also has high research value.

Third, personal ability needs to be further refined. Ability is a multidimensional concept, and achievement is closely related to ability and motivation (). Different learning situations can produce different kinds of specific abilities, leading to the differentiation of abilities (). Therefore, it is necessary to further define abilities and refine the influence of different aspects of abilities on participation intention.

Fourth, guidance in the context of social practice should not raise unrealistic expectations but rather focus on creating opportunities to exercise social practice and reasonably arranging the associated process (Roberts, 1977). This study aims to propose a new model to study the influencing factors of students’ social practice behavior and participation intentions. Preliminary data have been collected on various factors’ degree of influence, thus enhancing the reliability of the theoretical basis for a follow-up study on specific practice activities.

Statements

Data availability statement

The original contributions presented in this study are included in the article/supplementary material, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Author contributions

YL: formal analysis, investigation, and writing – original draft and review and editing. ZJ: methodology, investigation, visualization, and writing – review and editing. GD: conceptualization and writing – original draft. RZ and TW: writing – original draft and review and editing. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted manuscript.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

References

  • 1

    AffusoG.ZannoneA.EspositoC.PannoneM.MirandaM. C.De AngelisG.et al (2022). The effects of teacher support, parental monitoring, motivation and self-efficacy on academic performance over time.Eur. J. Psychol. Educ.1–23. 10.1007/s10212-021-00594-6

  • 2

    AjzenI. (1991). The theory of planned behavior.Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process.50179–211. 10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T

  • 3

    AjzenI.MaddenT. J. (1986). Prediction of goal-directed behavior: Attitudes, intentions, and perceived behavioral control.J. Exp. Soc. Psychol.22453–474. 10.1016/0022-1031(86)90045-4

  • 4

    AjzenI.BrownT. C.CarvajalF. (2004). Explaining the discrepancy between intentions and actions: The case of hypothetical bias in contingent valuation.Pers. Soc. Psychol. Bull.301108–1121. 10.1177/0146167204264079

  • 5

    Al-JubariI. (2019). College students’ entrepreneurial intention: Testing an integrated model of SDT and TPB.Sage Open91–15. 10.1177/2158244019853467

  • 6

    ArmstrongF.TsokovaD. (eds) (2019). Action Research for Inclusive Education: Participation and Democracy in Teaching and Learning.Milton Park: Routledge. 10.4324/9781351048361

  • 7

    BairdK.HarrisonG.ReeveR. (2007). Success of activity management practices: The influence of organizational and cultural factors.Account. Finance4747–67. 10.1111/j.1467-629X.2006.00195.x

  • 8

    BarrettiM. (2004). What do we know about the professional socialization of our students?J. Soc. Work Educ.40255–283. 10.1080/10437797.2004.10778493

  • 9

    BermanP. (1977). Federal Programs Supporting Educational Change, Vol. VII: Factors Affecting Implementation and Continuation.Santa Monica, CA: The RAND Corporation.

  • 10

    BiggsJ. B. (1993). From theory to practice: A cognitive systems approach.High. Educ. Res. Dev.1273–85. 10.1080/0729436930120107

  • 11

    BordenL. M.LeeS. A.SeridoJ.CollinsD. (2008). Changing college students’ financial knowledge, attitudes, and behavior through seminar participation.J. Fam. Econ. Issues2923–40. 10.1007/s10834-007-9087-2

  • 12

    BrandtD.ClintonK. (2002). Limits of the local: Expanding perspectives on literacy as a social practice.J. Lit. Res.34337–356. 10.1207/s15548430jlr3403_4

  • 13

    BresnenM.EdelmanL.NewellS.ScarbroughH.SwanJ. (2003). Social practices and the management of knowledge in project environments.Int. J. Project Manag.21157–166. 10.1016/S0263-7863(02)00090-X

  • 14

    CasperM. (2001). A definition of “social environment”.Am. J. Public Health91465–470. 10.2105/AJPH.91.3.465a

  • 15

    ChaiklinH. (2011). Attitudes, behavior, and social practice.J. Soc. Soc. Welfare3831.

  • 16

    CharterR. A. (2003). Combining reliability coefficients: Possible application to meta-analysis and reliability generalization.Psychol. Rep.93643–647. 10.2466/pr0.2003.93.3.643

  • 17

    ChengE. W. (2019). Choosing between the theory of planned behavior (TPB) and the technology acceptance model (TAM).Educ. Technol. Res. Dev.6721–37. 10.1007/s11423-018-9598-6

  • 18

    ChristieM.De GraaffE. (2017). The philosophical and pedagogical underpinnings of active learning in engineering education.Eur. J. Eng. Educ.425–16. 10.1080/03043797.2016.1254160

  • 19

    ChuangY. T. (2014). Increasing learning motivation and student engagement through the technology-supported learning environment.Creat. Educ.5:1969. 10.4236/ce.2014.523221

  • 20

    ConnerM.ArmitageC. J. (1998). Extending the theory of planned behavior: A review and avenues for further research.J. Appl. Soc. Psychol.281429–1464. 10.1111/j.1559-1816.1998.tb01685.x

  • 21

    CuipingM. (2021). On the role of counselors in the construction of the teaching staff of employment guidance courses from the perspective of social practice.Front. Educ. Res.431–35.

  • 22

    DailyL. Z. (2018). Towards a definition of “hobby”: An empirical test of a proposed operational definition of the word hobby.J. Occup. Sci.25368–382. 10.1080/14427591.2018.1463286

  • 23

    DanzD.VesterlundL.WilsonA. J. (2022). Belief elicitation and behavioral incentive compatibility.Am. Econ. Rev.

  • 24

    DuanW.JiangG. (2008). A review of the theory of planned behavior.Adv. Psychol. Sci.16315–320.

  • 25

    DweckC. S. (2002). “The development of ability conceptions,” in Development of Achievement Motivation, edsWigfieldA.EcclesJ. S. (Cambridge, MA: Academic Press), 57–88. 10.1016/B978-012750053-9/50005-X

  • 26

    FergusonG. A. (1954). On learning and human ability.Can. J. Psychol.8:95. 10.1037/h0083598

  • 27

    FieldingK. S.TerryD. J.MasserB. M.HoggM. A. (2008). Integrating social identity theory and the theory of planned behaviour to explain decisions to engage in sustainable agricultural practices.Br. J. Soc. Psychol.4723–48. 10.1348/014466607X206792

  • 28

    FornellC.LarckerD. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error.J. Market. Res.1839–50. 10.1177/002224378101800104

  • 29

    GagnéC.GodinG. (2000). The theory of planned behavior: Some measurement issues concerning belief−based variables.J. Appl. Soc. Psychol.302173–2193. 10.1111/j.1559-1816.2000.tb02431.x

  • 30

    GemmelL. J.ClaytonP. H. (2009). A Comprehensive Framework for Community Service-Learning in Canada.Ottawa, ON: Canadian Alliance for Community Service-Learning.

  • 31

    GirardA.Gal-PetitfauxN.VorsO. (2021). The student’s experience of teacher support in French vocational high-school classes with difficulties in school engagement in physical education: interest of mixed methods research.Phys. Educ. Sport Pedagogy27, 156–171. 10.1080/17408989.2021.1999918

  • 32

    GodinG.KokG. (1996). The theory of planned behavior: A review of its applications to health-related behaviors.Am. J. Health Promot.1187–98. 10.4278/0890-1171-11.2.87

  • 33

    GoldnerL.GolanD. (2017). The long−term effects of youth mentoring on student mentors’ civic engagement attitudes and behavior.J. Commun. Psychol.45691–703. 10.1002/jcop.21886

  • 34

    HairJ. F.BlackW. C.BabinB. J.AndersonR. E.TathamR. L. (2006). Multivariate data analysis 6th Edition. Pearson Prentice Hall. New Jersey. humans: Critique and reformulation.J. Abnorm. Psychol.8749–74.

  • 35

    HairJ.HollingsworthC. L.RandolphA. B.ChongA. Y. L. (2017). An updated and expanded assessment of PLS-SEM in information systems research.Industr. Manag. Data Syst.117442–458. 10.1108/IMDS-04-2016-0130

  • 36

    HamidiH.ChavoshiA. (2018). Analysis of the essential factors for the adoption of mobile learning in higher education: A case study of students of the University of Technology.Telemat. Inform.351053–1070. 10.1016/j.tele.2017.09.016

  • 37

    HarelI.PapertS. (1990). Software design as a learning environment.Interact. Learn. Environ.11–32. 10.1080/1049482900010102

  • 38

    HargreavesT. (2011). Practice-ing behaviour change: Applying social practice theory to pro-environmental behaviour change.J. Consum. Cult.1179–99. 10.1177/1469540510390500

  • 39

    HarrC. (2013). Promoting workplace health by diminishing the negative impact of compassion fatigue and increasing compassion satisfaction.Soc. Work Christ.40:71.

  • 40

    HashimH.HoW. S. (2011). Renewable energy policies and initiatives for a sustainable energy future in Malaysia.Renew. Sustain. Energ. Rev.154780–4787. 10.1016/j.rser.2011.07.073

  • 41

    HaunbergerS.HadjarA. (2020). Why are male students less likely to opt for social science courses? A theory-driven analysis.Int. Soc. Work6117–34. 10.1177/0020872819884982

  • 42

    HayesJ.AllinsonC. W. (1998). Cognitive style and the theory and practice of individual and collective learning in organizations.Hum. Relat.51847–871. 10.1177/001872679805100701

  • 43

    HermantoN.ZuroffD. C. (2016). The social mentality theory of self-compassion and self-reassurance: The interactive effect of care-seeking and caregiving.J. Soc. Psychol.156523–535. 10.1080/00224545.2015.1135779

  • 44

    Holenko DlabM.Hoic-BozicN. (2021). Effectiveness of game development-based learning for acquiring programming skills in lower secondary education in Croatia.Educ. Inf. Technol.264433–4456. 10.1007/s10639-021-10471-w

  • 45

    HwangG. J.ChuH. C.ShihJ. L.HuangS. H.TsaiC. C. (2010). A decision-tree-oriented guidance mechanism for conducting nature science observation activities in a context-aware ubiquitous learning environment.J. Educ. Technol. Soc.1353–64.

  • 46

    IwatsukiT. (2019). What is ‘educational support’ for youth in social difficulties?: A qualitative study of support groups for literacy learning in Japan.Int. J. Lifelong Educ.38465–477. 10.1080/02601370.2019.1648575

  • 47

    JacobsonM. J.KimB.PathakS.ZhangB. (2015). To guide or not to guide: Issues in the sequencing of pedagogical structure in computational model-based learning.Interact. Learn. Environ.23715–730. 10.1080/10494820.2013.792845

  • 48

    JeromeL. (2012). Service learning and active citizenship education in England.Educ. Citizensh. Soc. Just.759–70. 10.1177/1746197911432594

  • 49

    JiangF. (2021). A study of influencing factors of college students’ behavioral intention to learn in blended teaching environment.e-Educ. Res.105–112+128. 10.13811/j.cnki.eer.2021.06.015

  • 50

    JinY. Q.LinC. L.ZhaoQ.YuS. W.SuY. S. (2021). A study on traditional teaching method transferring to E-learning under the COVID-19 pandemic: From Chinese students’ perspectives.Front. Psychol.12:632787. 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.632787

  • 51

    JordanD. T. L. (2000). Human Behavior and the Social Environment I.Fayetteville, AR: University of Arkansas.

  • 52

    KammiganI. (2022). Reflecting on the interaction of self-control and morality in situational action theory: Comparing absolute and relative effects of self-control in 28 countries.J. Quant. Criminol.1–29. 10.1007/s10940-022-09541-0

  • 53

    KanT.ZhangJ. (2015). Comprehensive application of health belief model and rational planned behavior theory in the field of health behavior.Chin. J. Behav. Med. Brain Sci.24, 284–288.

  • 54

    KelmJ. L.McIntoshK. (2012). Effects of school−wide positive behavior support on teacher self−efficacy.Psychol. Schl49137–147. 10.1002/pits.20624

  • 55

    KiesewetterJ.EbersbachR.TsalasN.HolzerM.SchmidmaierR.FischerM. R. (2016). Knowledge is not enough to solve the problems–The role of diagnostic knowledge in clinical reasoning activities.BMC Med. Educ.16:303. 10.1186/s12909-016-0821-z

  • 56

    KingR. (2017). The Sociology of School Organization.Milton Park: Routledge. 10.4324/9781315210094

  • 57

    KinnearT. C.TaylorJ. R.AhmedS. A. (1974). Ecologically concerned consumers: Who are they? Ecologically concerned consumers can be identified.J. Market.3820–24. 10.1177/002224297403800205

  • 58

    KlemA. M.ConnellJ. P. (2004). Relationships matter: Linking teacher support to student engagement and achievement.J. Schl Health74262–273. 10.1111/j.1746-1561.2004.tb08283.x

  • 59

    KoenisS. (1993). The cultural specificity of sociological practices; the case of max Horkheimer’s institut für sozialforschung in Weimar−Germany and the United States.Innov. Eur. J. Soc. Sci. Res.6179–194. 10.1080/13511610.1993.9968347

  • 60

    KuangK.GuoY.WangJ. (2017). Investigation and analysis of students’ cognition of procedural teaching at different levels.Guangdong Vocat. Tech. Educ. Res.77–79.

  • 61

    LiW.HaoM. (2020). Construction and operation of “5P” mode of college students’ social practice.Educ. Exploration62–65.

  • 62

    LihuaD. (2021). An extended model of the theory of planned behavior: An empirical study of entrepreneurial intention and entrepreneurial behavior in college students.Front. Psychol.12:627818. 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.627818

  • 63

    LinC. L.JinY. Q.ZhaoQ.YuS. W.SuY. S. (2021). Factors influence students’ switching behavior to online learning under COVID-19 pandemic: A push–pull–mooring model perspective.Asia Pacif. Educ. Res.30229–245. 10.1007/s40299-021-00570-0

  • 64

    LiuJ. (2017). Analysis of the impact of entrepreneurship education on college students’ entrepreneurship intention based on the theory of planned behavior.High. Educ. Exploration117–122.

  • 65

    LuoB.ChenY.LiY. (2012). Investigation and analysis of the current situation of learning psychological quality of middle school students-taking Beijing as an example.J. Chin. Soc. Educ.20–23. 4808 (2012) 02- 0020- 04

  • 66

    LynchR.HennessyJ.GleesonJ. (2013). Acknowledging teacher professionalism in Ireland: The case for a chartered teacher initiative.Irish Educ. Stud.32493–510. 10.1080/03323315.2013.854453

  • 67

    MaJ. (2007). Paying attention to the research of normative value.Philos. Trends16–20.

  • 68

    MaQ. (2003). Experience and enlightenment of foreign college students’ social practice.China Youth Study72–75.

  • 69

    MacBethA.SchwannauerM.GumleyA. (2008). The association between attachment style, social mentalities, and paranoid ideation: An analogue study.Psychol. Psychother.8179–93. 10.1348/147608307X246156

  • 70

    MakhmudovK. (2020). Innovative cluster of pedagogical education: Common goals and specific interests.Acad. Res. Educ. Sci.1182–187.

  • 71

    MaltiT.NoamG. G. (2016). Social-emotional development: From theory to practice.Eur. J. Dev. Psychol.13652–665. 10.1080/17405629.2016.1196178

  • 72

    MartinF.ErtzbergerJ. (2013). Here and now mobile learning: An experimental study on the use of mobile technology.Comput. Educ.6876–85. 10.1016/j.compedu.2013.04.021

  • 73

    MassyW. F.WilgerA. K.ColbeckC. (1994). Departmental cultures and teaching quality: Overcoming “hollowed” collegiality.Change Magaz. High. Learn.2611–20. 10.1080/00091383.1994.9938496

  • 74

    McKenneyS.MorY. (2015). Supporting teachers in data−informed educational design.Br. J. Educ. Technol.46265–279. 10.1111/bjet.12262

  • 75

    McMahonM.BhamraT. (2012). ‘Design beyond borders’: International collaborative projects as a mechanism to integrate social sustainability into student design practice.J. Clean. Prod.2386–95. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2011.10.022

  • 76

    MukherjeeA. S.LapreM. A.Van WassenhoveL. N. (1998). Knowledge driven quality improvement.Manag. Sci.44S35–S49. 10.1287/mnsc.44.11.S35

  • 77

    NasurdinA. M.HemdiM. A.GuatL. P. (2008). Does perceived organizational support mediate the relationship between human resource management practices and organizational commitment?Asian Acad. Manag. J. Account. Finance1315–36.

  • 78

    NechitaE.CojocariuV. M.PăcurariD. (2014). Internationalization of higher education at home. an initiative for teaching informatics.Procedia Soc. Behav. Sci.149624–628. 10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.08.238

  • 79

    NiL. (2021). Phenomenological analysis of three types of perception.Psychol. Res.388–398.

  • 80

    PaasF.TuovinenJ. E.TabbersH.Van GervenP. W. (2016). Cognitive load measurement as a means to advance cognitive load theory.Educ. Psychol.1363–71. 10.1207/S15326985EP3801_8

  • 81

    PaulS. (2017). Value orientation in higher education: Problems and prospects from sustainable development perspectives.Int. J. Soc. Sci.6:31. 10.5958/2321-5771.2017.00004.7

  • 82

    RhodesR. E.CourneyaK. S. (2005). Threshold assessment of attitude, subjective norm, and perceived behavioral control for predicting exercise intention and behavior.Psychol. Sport Exerc.6349–361. 10.1016/j.psychsport.2004.04.002

  • 83

    RobertsK. (1977). The social conditions, consequences and limitations of careers guidance.Br. J. Guidance Couns.51–9. 10.1080/03069887708258093

  • 84

    Rueda BarriosG. E.RodriguezJ. F. R.PlazaA. V.Vélez ZapataC. P.ZuluagaM. E. G. (2022). Entrepreneurial intentions of university students in Colombia: Exploration based on the theory of planned behavior.J. Educ. Bus.97176–185.1. 10.1080/08832323.2021.1918615

  • 85

    Ruiz-JiménezM. C.Martínez-JiménezR.Licerán-GutiérrezA.García-MartíE. (2022). Students’ attitude: Key to understanding the improvement of their academic results in a flipped classroom environment.Int. J. Manag. Educ.20:100635. 10.1016/j.ijme.2022.100635

  • 86

    SahuA. K.PadhyR. K.DhirA. (2020). Envisioning the future of behavioral decision-making: A systematic literature review of behavioral reasoning theory.Australas. Mark. J.28145–159. 10.1016/j.ausmj.2020.05.001

  • 87

    SayeJ. W.BrushT. (1999). Student engagement with social issues in a multimedia-supported learning environment.Theory Res. Soc. Educ.27472–504. 10.1080/00933104.1999.10505891

  • 88

    SergisS.SampsonD. G. (2017). “Teaching and learning analytics to support teacher inquiry: A systematic literature review,” in Learning Analytics: Fundaments, Applications, and Trends, ed.Peña-AyalaA. (Cham: Springer), 25–63. 10.1007/978-3-319-52977-6_2

  • 89

    ShahiT.FarrokhshereshtB.TaghipourianM. J.AghajaniH. A. (2020). Behavioral factors affecting talent management: Meta-synthesis technique.Iran. J. Manag. Stud.13117–137.

  • 90

    ShawJ.ReyesP. (1992). School cultures: Organizational value orientation and commitment.J. Educ. Res.85295–302. 10.1080/00220671.1992.9941129

  • 91

    ShukriM.JonesF.ConnerM. (2022). Theory of planned behaviour, psychological stressors and intention to avoid violating traffic rules: A multi-level modelling analysis.Accid. Anal. Prev.169:106624. 10.1016/j.aap.2022.106624

  • 92

    SkoglundE.FernandezJ.ShererJ. T.CoyleE. A.GareyK. W.FlemingM. L.et al (2020). Using the theory of planned behavior to evaluate factors that influence pharmD students’ intention to attend lectures.Am. J. Pharm. Educ.84:7550. 10.5688/ajpe7550

  • 93

    SkopM.PeisachovichE.CaoL. (2021). Curricular considerations: The process of integrating simulation-based learning into a social work communication and interviewing skills course.Cureus13:e19191. 10.7759/cureus.19191

  • 94

    SmithD.HardakerG. (2000). E-learning innovation through the implementation of an internet supported learning environment.J. Educ. Technol. Soc.3422–432.

  • 95

    SuY.ZhuZ.ChenJ.JinY.WangT.LinC. L.et al (2021). Factors influencing entrepreneurial intention of university students in China: Integrating the perceived university support and theory of planned behavior.Sustainability13:4519. 10.3390/su13084519

  • 96

    SuldoS. M.FriedrichA. A.WhiteT.FarmerJ.MinchD.MichalowskiJ. (2009). Teacher support and adolescents’ subjective well-being: A mixed-methods investigation.Schl Psychol. Rev.3867–85. 10.1080/02796015.2009.12087850

  • 97

    SummersR. (2021). A mixed methods exploration of secondary students’ attitudes and intentions in relation to elective science course enrollment.Schl Sci. Math.121395–407. 10.1111/ssm.12495

  • 98

    SunX. (2021). Research on the online learning behavior intention model of higher vocational college students.Industr. Technol. Vocat. Educ.54–59. 10.16825/j.cnki.cn13-1400/tb.2021.02.017

  • 99

    SuttonS. (1998). Predicting and explaining intentions and behavior: How well are we doing?J. Appl. Soc. Psychol.281317–1338. 10.1111/j.1559-1816.1998.tb01679.x

  • 100

    ThyerB. A. (2015). Preparing current and future practitioners to integrate research in real practice settings.Res. Soc. Work Pract.25463–472. 10.1177/1049731514538105

  • 101

    TuomelaR. (2002). The Philosophy of Social Practices: A Collective Acceptance View.Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511487446

  • 102

    UzunF. V.KelesO. (2012). The effects of nature education project on the environmental awareness and behavior.Procedia Soc. Behav. Sci.462912–2916. 10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.05.588

  • 103

    Van De MieroopD.CliftonJ.SchnurrS. (2021). Narratives as social practice in organisational contexts.Narrative Inq.321–8. 10.1075/ni.21090.van

  • 104

    Van Der WieleT. (1995). Quality management in a teaching organization.Total Qual. Manag.6497–508. 10.1080/09544129550035161

  • 105

    VosgerauG.NewenA. (2007). Thoughts, motor actions, and the self.Mind Lang.2222–43. 10.1111/j.1468-0017.2006.00298.x

  • 106

    WangD.LiuH.QiuM. (2020). Analysis method and application verification of teachers’ behavior data in smart classroom.China Educ. Technol.120–127.

  • 107

    WangX. (2005). Social practice is an important link of ideological and political education for college students.Soc. Sci. Chin. High. Educ. Inst.30–31.

  • 108

    WangX.LiuX.PangL. (2021). A study on the secondary vocational students’ intention of enter to higher education in the underdeveloped areas of Western China based on the theory of planned behavior.Chin. Stud.10195–210. 10.4236/chnstd.2021.104013

  • 109

    WinslowL. E. (1996). Programming pedagogy—a psychological overview.ACM Sigcse Bull.2817–22. 10.1145/234867.234872

  • 110

    WongS. L.HodsonD. (2010). More from the horse’s mouth: What scientists say about science as a social practice.Int. J. Sci. Educ.321431–1463. 10.1080/09500690903104465

  • 111

    XiaX. (2020). Random field design and collaborative inference strategies for learning interaction activities.Interact. Learn. Environ.1–25. [Epub ahead of print]. 10.1080/10494820.2020.1863236

  • 112

    XuY.MoS.WangZ.LuoH.WangY.ZhangQ. H.et al (2016). “Research on the ideological and political course of reverse psychology around college students-based on the image of teachers,” in Proceedings of 2016 International Conference on Education, Management and Applied Social Science(EMASS 2016), (Lancaster, PA: DEStech Publications), 50–62. 10.12783/dtssehs/emass2016/6758

  • 113

    YangS. (2015). Guiyang College PE Majors Paid Professional Research Status of Social Practice (A Master’s Degree Thesis).Guizhou: Guizhou normal university.

  • 114

    YangX. (2005). Negative mentality and countermeasures of college students’ ideological and political theory study.J. Guizhou Educ. Univ. (Soc. Sci.)42–46+101.

  • 115

    YaoJ.ShiQ. (2016). Problems existing in college students’ social practice and solutions.Lead. J. Ideol. Theoret. Educ.147–149. 10.16580/j.sxlljydk.2016.03.033

  • 116

    YeanT. F.JohariJ.SukeryA. F. M. (2015). The influence of attitude, subjective norms, and perceived behavioural control on intention to return to work: A case of socso’s insured employees.Kajian Malaysia J. Malaysian Stud.33141–154.

  • 117

    YousafzaiA.ChangV.GaniA.NoorR. M. (2016). Multimedia augmented m-learning: Issues, trends and open challenges.Int. J. Inf. Manag.36784–792. 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2016.05.010

  • 118

    Yuan-QiangH. E.RongL. I. A. N.Li-JuanQ. U. A. N. (2019). Positive social mentality: The goals, mechanism and pathways of cultivation with mindfulness.J. Psychol. Sci.463.

  • 119

    ZhaoC. M.KuhG. D.CariniR. M. (2005). A comparison of international student and American student engagement in effective educational practices.J. High. Educ.76209–231. 10.1353/jhe.2005.0018

  • 120

    ZhengH.YangM. (2006). Some new trends of structural changes in social practice-a new perspective of sociological analysis.J. Soc. Sci.109–115.

  • 121

    ZhengW.WangZ. (2010). How should ideological and political workers improve the quality of higher education.Soc. Sci. Rev.191–192.

  • 122

    ZsókaÁSzerényiZ. M.SzéchyA.KocsisT. (2013). Greening due to environmental education? Environmental knowledge, attitudes, consumer behavior and everyday pro-environmental activities of Hungarian high school and university students.J. Clean. Prod.48126–138. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.11.030

  • 123

    ZupicI.ČaterT. (2015). Bibliometric methods in management and organization.Organ. Res. Methods18429–472. 10.1177/1094428114562629

Summary

Keywords

theory of planned behavior, mixed research method, social practice, participation willingness, perceived environmental support

Citation

Li Y, Jin Z, Dong G, Zheng R and Wang T (2022) A survey of college students’ willingness to participate in social practice with perceived environmental support based on the applied mixed research method. Front. Psychol. 13:972556. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.972556

Received

18 June 2022

Accepted

15 August 2022

Published

08 September 2022

Volume

13 - 2022

Edited by

Chih-Chao Chung, National Pingtung University of Science and Technology, Taiwan

Reviewed by

Chuan-Yu Mo, Sanming University, China; Te-Hsin Hsieh, Xiamen University Tan Kah Kee College, China

Updates

Copyright

*Correspondence: Ting Wang,

This article was submitted to Organizational Psychology, a section of the journal Frontiers in Psychology

Disclaimer

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Outline

Figures

Cite article

Copy to clipboard


Export citation file


Share article

Article metrics