In the published article, there was an error in Table 1 as published. In the section “Gender identity” the rows “Transgender men” and “Transgender women” were reversed. The n value for “Transgender men” was given as “265 (61.65)” but should be “124 (29.31).” The n value for “Transgender women” was given as “124 (29.31)” but should be “265 (61.65).” The corrected Table 1 appears below.
Table 1
| n (%) | |
|---|---|
| Gender identity | |
| Transgender women | 265 (61.65) |
| Transgender men | 124 (29.31) |
| Gender non-conforming persons | 34 (8.04) |
| Medical gender affirmation status (hormone, surgery, silicone, etc.) | |
| Done | 61 (14.49) |
| Doing | 186 (44.18) |
| Plan to do | 124 (29.45) |
| Not sure | 32 (7.60) |
| Will not do | 18 (4.28) |
| Age | |
| 18–24 | 212 (50.72) |
| 25–34 | 132 (31.58) |
| 35–44 | 50 (11.96) |
| 45–54 | 19 (4.55) |
| 55–64 | 5 (1.20) |
| Race/color/ethnic | |
| White | 313 (74.00) |
| Non-white | 110 (26.00) |
| Parda | 70 (16.55) |
| Yellow | 12 (2.84) |
| Indigenous | 2 (0.47) |
| Black | 26 (6.15) |
| Education | |
| None | 6 (1.42) |
| Fundamental education | 40 (9.46) |
| Middle education | 271 (64.07) |
| Higher education | 81 (19.15) |
| Postgraduate studies | 25 (5.91) |
| Population of city of residence | |
| 5,000–20,000 ihn. | 51 (12.06) |
| 20,000–50,000 inh. | 38 (8.98) |
| 50,000–1,00,000 inh. | 46 (10.87) |
| 1,00,000–5,00,000 inh. | 108 (25.53) |
| More than 5,00,000 inh. | 180 (42.55) |
Participants sociodemographic data.
The authors apologize for this error and state that this does not change the scientific conclusions of the article in any way. The original article has been updated.
Statements
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Summary
Keywords
parental support, gender affirmation, self-esteem, homelessness, transgender, gender diversity
Citation
Seibel BL, de Brito Silva B, Fontanari AMV, Catelan RF, Bercht AM, Stucky JL, DeSousa DA, Cerqueira-Santos E, Nardi HC, Koller SH and Costa AB (2023) Corrigendum: The impact of the parental support on risk factors in the process of gender affirmation of transgender and gender diverse people. Front. Psychol. 14:1206932. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1206932
Received
16 April 2023
Accepted
02 May 2023
Published
19 May 2023
Volume
14 - 2023
Edited and reviewed by
Pedro Alexandre Costa, University Institute of Psychological, Social and Life Sciences (ISPA), Portugal
Updates
Copyright
© 2023 Seibel, de Brito Silva, Fontanari, Catelan, Bercht, Stucky, DeSousa, Cerqueira-Santos, Nardi, Koller and Costa.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Angelo B. Costa angelo.costa@pucrs.br; angelobrandellicosta@gmail.com
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.