Abstract
Introduction:
This meta-analysis investigates the relationships between the Dark Triad personality traits (narcissism, Machiavellianism, and psychopathy) and mental toughness. Previous research has shown mixed results regarding the influence of these traits on mental toughness. The objective of this meta-analysis is to synthesize existing literature and provide a comprehensive understanding of how Dark Triad traits correlate with mental toughness.
Methods:
A comprehensive literature search was conducted in 7 databases, Data were extracted by correlation and analyzed using a random-effects model.
Results:
The results yielding 27 effect sizes with a total of 12,378 participants, revealed a significant moderate positive association between narcissism and mental toughness (r = 0.327, p < 0.001), suggesting that individuals with higher levels of narcissism tend to exhibit greater mental toughness. However, no significant associations were found between Machiavellianism (r = 0.023, p = 0.719) or psychopathy (r = −0.022, p = 0.625) and mental toughness.
Discussion:
The findings contribute to a more nuanced understanding of the Dark Triad traits and their differential associations with adaptive psychological constructs, highlighting the unique role of narcissism in mental toughness. This meta-analysis provides valuable insights for future research and practical applications in fostering adaptive aspects of narcissism while mitigating its potential maladaptive consequences.
1 Introduction
Dark Triad traits, comprising narcissism, Machiavellianism, and psychopathy, are often regarded as undesirable personality (Paulhus and Williams, 2002a). However, an increasing number of studies have begun to investigate the potential “bright” sides of these traits (Papageorgiou et al., 2019b; Neumann et al., 2020; ; ; Zheng and MacCann, 2023). Mental toughness, defined as an individual’s capacity to maintain commitment, confront challenges, and achieve goals in the face of adversity or stressful circumstances, is commonly observed among elite athletes (). Although there is some foundational research on the relationship between Dark Triad traits and mental toughness, there has been no systematic review or meta-analysis in this field to date. Therefore, this study aims to assess the relationship between the two through systematic review and meta-analysis, seeking to address this gap in the literature.
1.1 Dark triad
The Dark Triad, encompassing narcissism, Machiavellianism, and psychopathy, has garnered considerable attention in psychological research due to its strong association with socially aversive behaviors (Paulhus and Williams, 2002a). These traits share several core elements including callousness, disagreeableness, interpersonal exploitation, and a propensity for socially aversive actions (; ; ). Despite the interconnectedness of these dimensions, each trait exhibits distinctive features and behavioral patterns. Individuals scoring high in Narcissism is primarily characterized by an inflated sense of importance, entitlement, dominance, and superiority (; ). Individuals scoring high in Machiavellianism display a cynical worldview, a lack of principled living, and believe that manipulating others is key to success (; ). Individuals scoring high in Psychopathy is typically marked by emotional detachment, ruthlessness, and irresponsibility ().
Currently, Dark Triad research is mostly focused on two concise measures. One of the references is the Dirty Dozen (DTDD; ). The Dirty Dozen focuses on brevity using only four items for each member of the triumvirate. While certain researchers have found it beneficial, others have expressed criticism toward it (). Another widely used metric is the Short Dark Triad (SD3; ). The initial study by the SD3 authors included five experiments, which encompassed informant validation of all three subscales. The SD3 demonstrates better predictive power compared to the Dirty Dozen ().
1.2 Narcissism
The concept of narcissism derives from the Greek myth of Narcissus, an individual who fell in love with his own reflection. This mythological origin lays the foundation for the modern psychological understanding of narcissism, which is extensively examined both as a pathological facet of narcissistic personality disorder and as a broader personality trait (). Clinical narcissism has been a subject of significant scholarly interest, where individuals often exhibit characteristics such as exaggeration, dominance, and a marked sense of superiority (; ). Subclinical narcissism is recognized as a multidimensional construct, primarily divided into grandiose narcissism and vulnerable narcissism (Wink, 1991; Miller et al., 2011). Individuals with high levels of grandiose narcissism often show boastfulness, lack of humility, and tendencies toward interpersonal domination. Conversely, those characterized by vulnerable narcissism typically experience intense negative emotions, distrust, self-centeredness, and a profound need for attention and recognition ().
In the realm of research, the Narcissistic Personality Inventory (NPI) remains a widely used tool for assessing narcissism. This inventory has been pivotal in the study of Dark Triad traits, incorporating both the comprehensive original 40-item NPI (Raskin and Hall, 1979) and its streamlined version, the NPI-16 (). Notably, the NPI’s measurement of grandiose narcissism correlates strongly with other dark personality traits, underlining the intricate connections within the Dark Triad ().
1.3 Machiavellianism
Machiavellianism derives its name from Niccolò Machiavelli, a 16th-century Italian writer whose seminal work, “The Prince,” left an indelible mark on political thought. Unlike pathological personality disorders, Machiavellianism encapsulates a distinct behavioral style in political contexts, characterized by suave social charm, high manipulativeness, and a blatant disregard for conventional morality (). This trait typically manifests through strategic exploitation of others using charm and seduction to achieve personal gain (Turner and Martinez, 1977; ).
The measurement of Machiavellianism has been historically anchored by the Mach-IV scale, developed by , which remains a prominent instrument in psychological research. This scale is also integrated into newer assessments like the Short Dark Triad (), which captures broader dimensions of the Dark Triad traits, including Machiavellianism.
Further advancements in understanding this trait have been highlighted in recent studies, such as those by Truhan et al. (2021), which have refined the characterization of Machiavellianism. These studies delineate it into specific components: manipulation, a pervasive lack of morals and ethics, detachment, and cynicism, enhancing our comprehension of its multifaceted nature.
1.4 Psychopathy
Psychopathy is distinguished by traits such as superficial charm, exploitativeness, irresponsibility, and impulsivity (). It is frequently misconstrued with antisocial personality disorder; however, while the latter is characterized by behavioral manifestations, psychopathy is rooted in distinct personality traits (). Psychopaths are known for manipulating and exploiting interpersonal relationships to serve their own ends (, ), engaging in impulsive and often destructive behaviors without regard for the consequences to themselves or others.
At a subclinical level, psychopathy is considered the most malignant aspect of the Dark Triad, associated with arrogant and deceitful interpersonal styles, as well as impulsive and irresponsible risk-taking behaviors (; ; Malesza and Ostaszewski, 2016). These individuals typically exhibit a short-term goal orientation and a diminished need for belonging, frequently employing both reactive and instrumental aggression to achieve their goals (Schoenleber et al., 2011), and are known for their ruthless strategies to accomplish objectives (; ; ).
The Triarchic Model of Psychopathy outlines three distinct phenotypic constructs of psychopathy: disinhibition, which indicates a general predisposition toward impulse control issues; boldness, characterized by social dominance, emotional resilience, and venturesomeness; and meanness, defined by aggressive resource-seeking without regard for others (Patrick et al., 2009; Sleep et al., 2019). In psychometric assessments, the Self-Centered Impulsivity scale of the Psychopathic Personality Inventory (PPI) is notably correlated with dark personality traits (Lilienfeld and Andrews, 1996), while the Fearless Dominance factor is associated primarily with adaptive correlates (Lynam and Miller, 2012).
1.5 Mental toughness
Mental toughness was originally conceptualized in the context of athletic research, identified as a set of traits closely linked to exceptional sporting performance (). It is associated with numerous positive outcomes, such as enhanced adaptability, resolute goal pursuit, and robust coping strategies (; Perry et al., 2021). Generally, mental toughness is perceived as a personality construct that enables individuals to thrive in stressful environments, persist in their goals, and maintain confidence in adversity. Scholars hold varying views on the composition of mental toughness; some advocate for its multidimensionality (; ; Perry et al., 2021), while others support a unidimensional model (; ). The most widely accepted definition today is the four-dimensional model proposed by , comprising: (1) Control: the individual’s tendency to believe they can influence their life and emotions; (2) Commitment: the persistence in pursuing goals despite difficulties; (3) Challenge: viewing potential threats as opportunities for personal growth; (4) Confidence: maintaining a belief in one’s worth and ability to advance socially, even in the face of setbacks.
Various scales have been developed to measure mental toughness, including the Mental Toughness Questionnaire 48 (MTQ48; ) and its abridged version, the MTQ18 and MTQ10 (; ), the Sports Mental Toughness Questionnaire (SMTQ; Sheard et al., 2009), the Cricket Mental Toughness Inventory (CMTI; ), the Australian Football Mental Toughness Inventory (), and the Mental Toughness Index (MTI; ). Among these, the MTQ, based on Clough et al.’s 4C model, is the most extensively studied and used tool for measuring mental toughness (). Despite some controversy over its applicability in certain domains (), it is considered the “gold standard” for measuring mental toughness to date (Perry et al., 2021). In recent years, mental toughness has also garnered widespread attention in the fields of workplace and education (Lin et al., 2017).
1.6 Dark triad and mental toughness
While traditional views often emphasize the maladaptive and pathological aspects of the Dark Triad (Rauthmann and Kolar, 2012; ; Paulhus, 2020), recent research has begun to explore the connections between these traits and adaptive psychological characteristics (Wallace et al., 2009; Zeigler-Hill et al., 2019; ). Researchers have gradually identified overlaps between the Dark Triad and the concept of mental toughness. Both individuals with high narcissism and mental toughness exhibit significant self-confidence. Not only is it positively correlated with narcissism (Papageorgiou et al., 2018a,b), but it is also a central element in mental toughness (; Thelwell et al., 2005; ). Additionally, grandiose narcissism’s negative correlation with stress may suggests that narcissists can overcome adversity or unfavorable environments at any cost to achieve their goals, indicating a potential positive correlation with mental toughness (Papageorgiou et al., 2019a,b).
Individuals with Machiavellian tendencies emphasize short-term gains and are prone to achieve ends by any means necessary (; ; ; ). However, their poor self-control may make it difficult for them to persist in the face of adversity (; Malesza and Ostaszewski, 2016), opting instead to manipulate others or seek alternative strategies rather than facing challenges directly (; Wilson et al., 1996), likely resulting in a negative correlation with mental toughness.
Psychopathic individuals may exhibit impulsive and irresponsible behavior under stress (), lack the necessary self-discipline and are associated with dysfunctional impulsivity (; ; Malesza and Ostaszewski, 2016), indicating difficulty in resisting immediate rewards in pursuit of greater delayed gratification (; ; ). This pursuit of immediate gratification can impair decision-making processes () and lead to reckless and self-destructive behaviors (; ). Therefore, psychopathy might be negatively correlated with mental toughness.
Beyond overlapping dimensions between the two variables, other theoretical frameworks also lend insights into the relationship between the Dark Triad and mental toughness. First, the Dark Triad and mental toughness may share a link due to their association with the Big Five personality traits. The most consistent correlations of Dark Triad traits are negatively with agreeableness and conscientiousness (Paulhus and Williams, 2002b; ; ; Paulhus, 2014). In the HEXACO model, Honesty–Humility is nearly antithetical to the Dark Triad (, 2014; Lee et al., 2013). Given the Dark Triad’s poor interpersonal relationships, evasion of responsibility, and habitual lying (Paulhus, 2014), this is not surprising. Conversely, some studies find mental toughness positively correlates with agreeableness and conscientiousness (Veselka et al., 2009; Yankov et al., 2019; Rodrigues et al., 2023). Individuals high in mental toughness can maintain a positive and optimistic commitment under adverse conditions, reflecting both agreeableness and conscientiousness. Also, the commitment dimension of mental toughness highly overlaps with Honesty–Humility (; ). Thus, the inverse relationship with the Big Five and HEXACO may imply a negative correlation between the Dark Triad and mental toughness.
Secondly, evolutionary psychological survival strategies might also ground the relationship between the Dark Triad and mental toughness. Life history strategies range from delayed to immediate gratification (, ). Individuals with Dark Triad traits tending toward immediate gratification characterized by poor self-control, frequent short-term mating, selfishness, and other antisocial behaviors. Each member of the Dark Triad exploits others in unique social contexts, and their callous exploitation has promoted reproductive success. Although Dark Triad generally tend toward immediate gratification (), narcissism exhibits the least tendency in this regard (). Compared to the other traits, grandiose exhibitionism facets of narcissism are associated with a slow life strategy (). Therefore, highly narcissistic individuals are more likely to exhibit mental toughness.
Thirdly, the dual-personality framework and differing domain performances might also provide a basis for the potential correlation between the Dark Triad and mental toughness (). The Dark Triad are characterized by high agency and low communion, meaning, despite generally being unpopular, they can still perform excellently (). Mental toughness may support individuals with the Dark Triad to endure the stress of unpopularity and relentlessly pursue their goals in unfavorable situations. For instance, in the workplace, the Dark Triad may help individuals become leaders. Narcissism is considered a typical trait of leaders (Rosenthal and Pittinsky, 2006; ). In leadership positions, Individuals with high levels of narcissism are perceived as more charismatic (; ). Some researchers now focus on so-called successful narcissists (; ; Zeigler-Hill et al., 2019). Moreover, when high levels of Dark Triad traits are combined with other factors, such as intelligence, physical attractiveness, they generally aid in attaining leadership positions (). Given that the impact of mental toughness in enterprises has been widely recognized (Ruparel, 2020; Lee and Kim, 2023; Ruparel et al., 2023; Suharti and Kurniawati, 2023), mental toughness might also be one of the underlying factors. In education, mental toughness helps students cope with academic pressure and achieve academic success. For instance, narcissism might manifest as academic confidence and the pursuit of excellence. Research suggests that the relationship between narcissism and MT may be one of the non-cognitive mechanisms leading to individual performance differences in school (Papageorgiou et al., 2019b). In contrast, Machiavellianism and psychopathy are more likely to “find alternative paths.” The most obvious examples are cheating and plagiarism in papers. While psychopathy is the only independent predictor of exam cheating (Nathanson et al., 2006), Machiavellianism can also predict paper plagiarism (Williams et al., 2010). In sports, mental toughness is a key factor in maintaining high performance under pressure and challenges for athletes. However, those with darker personalities continually may face the temptation to cut corners, such as using performance-enhancing drugs (Nicholls et al., 2017) and cheating (Potgieter, 2013). Interestingly, narcissism again distinguishes itself from the other dimensions. Athletes with high levels of narcissism do not tend to use unethical means to achieve victory because they have sufficient confidence in their abilities. They are more likely to overtraining, even if it makes them more prone to injuries (Yates, 1996; Tibbert, 2013).
1.7 The present study
Despite the insights provided by previous studies, our understanding of the relationships between the Dark Triad and mental toughness remains incomplete. First, previous findings have yielded inconsistent results. Discrepancies exist concerning the relationship between the Dark Triad and mental toughness, evident in the varied directions and magnitudes of their impact. For instance, some researchers have suggested that individuals with high levels of narcissism are more inclined to exhibit mental toughness (Papageorgiou et al., 2018a, 2023), while others have reported no effect or even a negative impact of narcissism on mental toughness (Ryerson, 2018; Milošević et al., 2022).
Further, there is a lack of consensus on which specific personality construct within the Dark Triad has greater explanatory power for mental toughness. For example, certain studies have found that narcissism exhibits the highest correlation with mental toughness, while others contend that Machiavellianism demonstrates the strongest correlation (Sabouri et al., 2016; Papageorgiou et al., 2019b).
Moreover, previous research has primarily focused on discrete contextual factors that may interact with personality constructs to impact mental toughness. However, personality expression is also influenced by domains, such as sport, education, and workplace (Lin et al., 2017; Szabó et al., 2022). To date, few studies have placed domain differences at the forefront of their designs.
To address these research gaps, this study aims to conduct a comprehensive systematic review of the relationship between narcissism, Machiavellianism and psychopathy and mental toughness by meta-analytically examining the impact of the Dark Triad. In this process, we will also assess the relative importance of each Dark Triad trait in predicting and explaining mental toughness, determining which Dark Triad construct has the strongest explanatory power.
Based on previous studies and the Dark Dyad theory (Papageorgiou et al., 2019b; Rogoza and Cieciuch, 2020), which posits that narcissism is more likely to be positively correlated with adaptive psychological traits, we hypothesize that:
H1: Narcissism will be positively associated with mental toughness.
In contrast, Machiavellianism and psychopathy, as components of the dark dyad, are more likely to be negatively correlated with adaptive psychological traits. We hypothesize that:
H2: Machiavellianism will be negatively associated with mental toughness.
H3: Psychopathy will be negatively associated with mental toughness.
Furthermore, previous research has highlighted the potential influence of domains such as sports, education, and the workplace. Therefore, this study will examine domains as possible moderators of the relationship between the Dark Triad and mental toughness to account for the inconsistent findings observed in previous studies.
Overall, this research makes three main contributions. First, to the best of our knowledge, this study is the first to use meta-analysis to clarify the relationships between the Dark Triad and mental toughness. Second, by comparing the frameworks of the Dark Triad, we present a more comprehensive understanding of these personality constructs and demonstrate whether narcissism has a brighter side compared to Machiavellianism and psychopathy in relation to mental toughness. Finally, we contribute to the literature by exploring the moderating role of domains in the relationships among the Dark Triad traits and mental toughness.
2 Methods
2.1 Literature search
To ensure comprehensive coverage, a literature search was executed across seven electronic databases: ScienceDirect, ProQuest, PsycINFO, Web of Science, PubMed, CNKI, and Google Scholar. The search utilized a combination of keywords tailored to each database’s specific syntax requirements. Keywords included permutations of (“Dark Triad” OR Narcissis* OR Machiavellian* OR Psychopathy OR Psychopathic) AND (Mental Toughness OR mentally tough). These terms targeted titles, abstracts, and keywords of articles. The search was conducted on February 16, 2024, with no date limitations imposed. Additionally, a manual search of reference lists from relevant articles was conducted to identify further studies.
2.2 Inclusion criteria
Inclusion in the meta-analysis required studies to: (1) empirically examine the relationship between at least one Dark Triad trait and mental toughness; (2) utilize validated measures for both constructs as presented in the introduction; (3) provide sufficient data (e.g., Pearson’s correlation coefficients, sample sizes) for effect size extraction; and (4) be published in English.
2.3 Study selection and data extraction
Following PRISMA guidelines (Moher et al., 2009), the selection process began by removing duplicates, followed by a preliminary screening of titles and abstracts by two independent researchers. Discrepancies were resolved via discussion until a consensus was reached. Potentially eligible articles underwent full-text review for final inclusion.
Data extraction was also independently conducted by two researchers using a standardized form, capturing details such as study and sample domains, measures used, and effect sizes. Disagreements were addressed through discussion, with a fifth researcher consulted as necessary. The process and results of the searches and screenings are illustrated in Figure 1.
Figure 1
2.4 Statistical analysis
Effect sizes were derived from Pearson’s correlation coefficients between the Dark Triad traits and mental toughness, transformed using Fisher’s z-transformation, and analyzed using a random-effects model. Random-effects model accommodating both within-study and between-study variability, provides conservative and generalizable estimates ().
Heterogeneity was evaluated using Cochran’s Q test and the I2 statistic, with significant heterogeneity indicated by I2 values over 50% (). Subgroup analyses were conducted to explore potential moderators like domains and measurement tools in cases of significant heterogeneity. Publication bias was assessed using funnel plots and Egger’s regression test (), with adjustments made using the trim-and-fill method () if necessary.
All statistical analyses were conducted using Comprehensive Meta-Analysis software, with significance set at a two-tailed p-value of less than 0.05. This study has been pre-registered in Prospero (CRD42023460188).
3 Results
An overview of the 15 studies included in this review, encompassing 27 samples and 53 effect sizes (k = 15, N = 12,378), which is presented in Table 1. Each study employed a cross-sectional design, with sample sizes varying from 92 to 1,238 participants. The studies were conducted across a diverse set of countries, including the United States, Canada, Australia, Italy, Iran, Hungary, Greece, Serbia, Germany, Thailand, and the United Kingdom and so on.
Table 1
| K | First author and year | n | MT tool | DT tool | N | M | P |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Papageorgiou et al. (2017) | 608 | MTQ-48 | SD3 | 0.20 | −0.07 | −0.08 |
| 2 | Papageorgiou et al. (2018a) | 927 | MTQ-10 | SD3 | 0.38 | ||
| 3 | Papageorgiou et al. (2018b) | 561 | MTQ-10 | SD3 | 0.34 | ||
| 4 | Szabó et al. (2022) | 189 | Self developed | SD3 | 0.47 | 0.00 | −0.02 |
| 5 | Szabó et al. (2022) | 134 | Self developed | SD3 | 0.33 | −0.03 | 0.03 |
| 6 | Szabó et al. (2022) | 345 | Self developed | SD3 | 0.34 | 0.02 | 0.16 |
| 7 | Sabouri et al. (2016) | 341 | MTQ-18 | NPI | 0.50 | 0.45 | 0.20 |
| 8 | Zamani Sani et al. (2022) | 308 | SMTQ | SD3 | 0.21 | −0.05 | −0.23 |
| 9 | Zamani Sani et al. (2022) | 152 | SMTQ | SDS3 | 0.24 | 0.04 | 0.00 |
| 10 | 189 | Self developed | SD3 | 0.47 | 0.00 | −0.02 | |
| 11 | 252 | MTQ-10 | SD3 | 0.24 | −0.06 | 0.04 | |
| 12 | 154 | MTQ-10 | SD3 | 0.36 | 0.04 | −0.04 | |
| 13 | Papageorgiou et al. (2019b) | 364 | MTQ-48 | SD3 | 0.44 | ||
| 14 | Papageorgiou et al. (2019b) | 364 | MTQ-48 | SD3 | 0.55 | ||
| 15 | Papageorgiou et al. (2019b) | 144 | MTQ-48 | SD3 | 0.46 | ||
| 16 | Vaughan et al. (2018) | 762 | MTQ-48 | SD3 | 0.28 | −0.30 | −0.26 |
| 17 | Manley et al. (2019) | 297 | MTI | NARQ | 0.15 | ||
| 18 | Truhan et al. (2022) | 611 | MTQ-10 | SD3 | 0.41 | ||
| 19 | Truhan et al. (2022) | 1,235 | MTQ-10 | SD3 | 0.28 | ||
| 20 | Papageorgiou et al. (2023) | 616 | MTQ-10 | SD3 | 0.40 | ||
| 21 | Papageorgiou et al. (2023) | 1,238 | MTQ-10 | SD3 | 0.28 | ||
| 22 | Papageorgiou et al. (2023) | 428 | MTQ-10 | SD3 | 0.27 | ||
| 23 | Papageorgiou et al. (2023) | 1,100 | MTQ-10 | SD3 | 0.33 | ||
| 24 | Papageorgiou et al. (2023) | 267 | MTQ-10 | SD3 | 0.39 | ||
| 25 | 444 | MTQ-48 | NPI | 0.33 | |||
| 26 | Milošević et al. (2022) | 92 | MTI | DDTD | −0.04 | 0.38 | 0.00 |
| 27 | Ryerson (2018) | 256 | MTQ-18 | DDTD | −0.06 | −0.11 | −0.03 |
Included studies.
A significant majority of the samples (20 out of 27) had a predominance of female participants. The domains of the samples were varied: eleven studies targeted university students, five focused on athletes, and three involved university employees. It is worth mentioning that four of the samples involved subjects who were both students and athletes. The measurement of Dark Triad traits predominantly utilized brief instruments: 20 samples employed the Short Dark Triad scale (SD3), three used the Dirty Dozen Measure (DDTD), and three assessed only narcissism, with two of these using the Narcissistic Admiration and Rivalry Questionnaire (NARQ) and one utilizing the Narcissistic Personality Inventory (NPI).
In terms of assessing mental toughness, a variety of instruments were used. The Mental Toughness Questionnaire (MTQ) was the most commonly employed, used in 18 samples. Additionally, two samples utilized the Mental Toughness Index (MTI), two employed the Sports Mental Toughness Questionnaire (SMTQ), and four used custom-developed measures.
3.1 Narcissism and mental toughness
The correlation between narcissism and mental toughness was robustly investigated across 27 samples from 15 distinct studies, encompassing a diverse range of sample sizes from 92 to 1,238 participants. Consistently, all measured effect sizes indicated a significant positive correlation between narcissism and mental toughness. The instruments used for assessing narcissism varied, with 20 samples utilizing the Short Dark Triad scale (SD3), two using the Narcissistic Personality Inventory (NPI), four employing the Dirty Dozen (DDTD), and one opting for the Narcissistic Admiration and Rivalry Questionnaire (NARQ). It is worth mentioning that the two non-significant effect sizes were both from the DDTD scale. While one study assessed both grandiose narcissism and vulnerable narcissism, we only extracted the correlation coefficient between grandiose narcissism and mental toughness, as narcissism present in individuals with the Dark Triad is characterized by grandiose narcissism. These findings uniformly support Hypothesis 1, confirming a stable positive association between narcissism and mental toughness across different study contexts and measurement tools.
3.2 Machiavellianism and mental toughness
This analysis involved 13 samples from nine studies, with sample sizes ranging between 92 and 762. The relationship between Machiavellianism and mental toughness showed mixed results: while the majority of samples reported no significant correlation, three studies did identify significant correlations, though they were inconsistent. Specifically, one study using the MACH-IV to measure Machiavellianism found a positive correlation with mental toughness, while two other studies, employing the Short Dark Triad (SD3) and the Dirty Dozen (DDTD) scales, found negative correlations. Given these mixed findings, the overall relationship between Machiavellianism and mental toughness remains inconclusive.
3.3 Psychopathy and mental toughness
Similarly, 13 samples from nine studies explored the association between psychopathy and mental toughness, with sample sizes ranging from 92 to 762. Of these, five samples indicated significant correlations: two reported positive correlations using the SRP-III and DDTD, while three found negative correlations, two using SD3 and one with DDTD. The other studies did not demonstrate a significant relationship. Thus, although a negative correlation was more frequently observed, the evidence regarding the relationship between psychopathy and mental toughness remains mixed and underscores the complexity of these interactions.
3.4 Meta-analysis
Meta-analytic results are detailed in Table 2 and visually represented in Forest Plot (Figures 2–4). The analysis revealed a significant small to moderate positive correlation between narcissism and mental toughness (r = 0.327, k = 27, N = 12,378; 95% CI = 0.08 to 0.27; Q = 173.693; I2 = 85.03%), substantiating Hypothesis 1. Conversely, the overall correlation between Machiavellianism and mental toughness was not significant and exhibited a small effect size (r = −0.032, k = 13, N = 3,782; 95% CI = −0.15 to 0.09; Q = 164.93; I2 = 92.73%), providing no support for Hypothesis H2. The relationship between psychopathy and mental toughness also showed no significant correlation (r = −0.022, k = 13, N = 3,782; 95% CI = −0.26 to 0.13; Q = 87.03; I2 = 86.21%).
Table 2
| Sample size | Number Studies | Point estimate | Lower limit | Upper limit | Z-value | P-value | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N | 12,378 | 27 | 0.327 | 0.284 | 0.369 | 13.978 | 0.000 |
| M | 3,782 | 13 | 0.023 | −0.101 | 0.146 | 0.360 | 0.719 |
| P | 3,782 | 13 | −0.022 | −0.111 | 0.067 | −0.489 | 0.625 |
Overall effect sizes.
Figure 2
Publication bias was assessed using funnel plots and Egger’s tests (illustrated in Figures 5–7 for narcissism, Machiavellianism, and psychopathy, respectively). The funnel plots indicated no publication bias for Machiavellianism (Figure 8). However, the plots for narcissism and psychopathy were asymmetrical, suggesting a potential omission of studies. Employing the trim and fill procedure to adjust for this bias, the association between narcissism and mental toughness remained positive and significant after four adjustment values (r = 0.30; 95% CI = 0.29 to 0.34; Q = 255.38; I2 = 78.75%), supporting Hypothesis 1 (Figure 9). However, although the association between psychopathy and mental toughness remained negative, it was still non-significant (r = −0.11; 95% CI = −0.13 to −0.08), hence not supporting Hypothesis 3 (Figure 10).
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Subgroup analyses were conducted to explore potential moderators of the relationship between narcissism and mental toughness. The moderators examined included domains, Dark Triad measurement tools, and mental toughness measurement tools. Across all domains, a positive correlation persisted, though the strength varied significantly. Athletes demonstrated the weakest correlation (r = 0.168; 95% CI = 0.048 to 0.283; p = 0.006), followed by students (r = 0.264; 95% CI = 0.178 to 0.347; p < 0.001), and corporate personnel exhibited the strongest correlation (r = 0.429; 95% CI = 0.365 to 0.489; p < 0.001).
Regarding the measurement tools, the SD3 scale consistently reported higher correlations between narcissism and mental toughness compared to other scales. Interestingly, studies using the Dirty Dozen (DDTD) scale did not find a significant relationship between narcissism and mental toughness. However, due to the limited number of studies utilizing the DDTD scale, its impact remains uncertain (Table 4).
Figure 6
Figure 7
Figure 8
Figure 9
Figure 10
Given the relatively small number of studies, many potential categorical moderators did not have sufficient numbers of effects within each category to conclusively determine the significance of moderation (Table 3).
Table 3
| Group | Sample size | Number Studies | Point estimate | Lower limit | Upper limit | Z-value | P-value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Athletes | 1775 | 5 | 0.168 | 0.048 | 0.283 | 2.734 | 0.006 |
| Employees | 723 | 3 | 0.429 | 0.365 | 0.489 | 11.744 | 0.000 |
| Internet | 7,172 | 11 | 0.368 | 0.309 | 0.425 | 11.333 | 0.000 |
| Students | 3,424 | 11 | 0.264 | 0.178 | 0.347 | 5.839 | 0.000 |
Subgroup analyses of domains.
4 Discussion
This article represents the first systematic review and meta-analysis exploring the relationship between the Dark Triad traits and mental toughness. Consistent with our first hypothesis, there is a significant moderate positive correlation between narcissism and mental toughness, suggesting that individuals with higher levels of narcissism may associated with greater mental toughness. However, no significant associations were found between Machiavellianism and psychopathy and mental toughness, thus our second and third hypotheses were not supported (Table 4).
Table 4
| Group | Sample size | Number Studies | Point estimate | Lower limit | Upper limit | Z-value | P-value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MTI | 389 | 2 | 0.076 | −0.107 | 0.253 | 0.815 | 0.415 |
| MTQ-10 | 7,389 | 11 | 0.335 | 0.300 | 0.368 | 17.703 | 0.000 |
| MTQ-18 | 597 | 2 | 0.241 | −0.338 | 0.687 | 0.806 | 0.421 |
| MTQ-48 | 2,686 | 6 | 0.378 | 0.267 | 0.479 | 6.284 | 0.000 |
| Self developed | 857 | 4 | 0.414 | 0.350 | 0.474 | 11.523 | 0.000 |
| SMTQ | 460 | 2 | 0.220 | 0.131 | 0.305 | 4.763 | 0.000 |
Subgroup analyses of mental toughness tool.
4.1 Narcissism and mental toughness
Current research indicates that individuals with high narcissism scores may exhibit higher levels of mental toughness, consistent with our first hypothesis. This finding aligns with previous research, highlighting the adaptive aspects of narcissism (Sedikides et al., 2004; Smith et al., 2016; Sedikides, 2021). One possible reason may stem from the mediating role of self-esteem between narcissism and mental toughness. described narcissism as addiction to esteem, which may be a crucial factor in the association between narcissism and mental health aspects. Individuals with high narcissism scores base their self-esteem on self-perceived competence (Tafarodi and Swann, 1995; Tafarodi and Milne, 2002), often possessing an inflated sense of self-worth and a strong desire to be admired. This may drive them to perceive themselves as invincible and capable of maintaining confidence in challenging situations (Rogoza et al., 2018; ). These reasons align with our proposal that narcissism should positively correlate with mental toughness due to its positive association with self-esteem. Further research indicates that grandiose narcissism in subclinical settings positively correlates with self-esteem. It is worth noting that the SD3 narcissism scale measures primarily the grandiose aspects of this construct, while the Dirty Dozen might capture both vulnerable and grandiose features of narcissism (Maples et al., 2014), suggesting that exploring this correlation for both types of narcissism could benefit future research (Table 5).
Table 5
| Group | Sample size | Number Studies | Point estimate | Lower limit | Upper limit | Z-value | P-value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DDTD | 348 | 2 | −0.055 | −0.159 | 0.051 | −1.014 | 0.310 |
| NARQ | 297 | 1 | 0.150 | 0.037 | 0.259 | 2.592 | 0.010 |
| NPI | 785 | 2 | 0.417 | 0.237 | 0.569 | 4.305 | 0.000 |
| SD3 | 11,245 | 22 | 0.350 | 0.313 | 0.386 | 17.054 | 0.000 |
Subgroup analyses of narcissism tool.
4.2 Machiavellianism and mental toughness
In contrast, Machiavellianism showed no significant association with mental toughness, contradicting our second hypothesis. We initially predicted a negative correlation, hypothesizing that individuals with high Machiavellian tendencies would employ more advantageous strategies in challenging environments rather than perseverance (; ; ). Although two studies supported this hypothesis, the overall results did not, as 10 out of 13 samples did not find a significant relationship. Notably, one study using the MACH-IV scale found a moderate-to-high positive correlation between Machiavellianism and mental toughness, suggesting that mentally tough individuals feel committed to their aims and goals, similar to the dedication to personal goals characteristic of those scoring high on Machiavellianism (Sabouri et al., 2016). While this could be a sample bias, it remains significant, indicating limitations in the measures used to assess Machiavellianism.
Both the DDTD and SD3 are abbreviated versions of the MACH-IV scale (; ), implying that they might have excluded certain Machiavellian traits that more accurately reflect dark aspects rather than adaptive aspects. Furthermore, the DDTD and SD3 scales have different emphases when measuring Machiavellianism. For instance, the DDTD scale captures only interpersonal manipulation, while the SD3 provides a broader assessment, including aspects like pragmatism and cynicism (). Future research could compare different Machiavellian scales to further explore elements that may correlate with mental toughness.
4.3 Psychopathy and mental toughness
The findings on the relationship between psychopathy and mental toughness were mixed and ultimately did not support our third hypothesis, which predicted a significant negative correlation. While the majority of studies did not find a significant relationship, three studies identified a negative correlation, suggesting that individuals with higher levels of psychopathy might struggle to persistently pursue goals due to impulsive behavior (Papageorgiou et al., 2017; Vaughan et al., 2018; Zamani Sani et al., 2022). Conversely, two studies suggested a positive correlation, positing that individuals with high psychopathy scores might pursue their goals with tenacity, similar to those with strong mental toughness, by disregarding the needs of others (Sabouri et al., 2016; Szabó et al., 2022). However, the overall analysis indicated no significant correlation between psychopathy and mental toughness. This lack of significant findings may be attributed to the limited number of studies or the inadequacies of current psychopathy scales to effectively capture the multifaceted nature of psychopathy, specifically differentiating between its potentially ‘bright’ and ‘dark’ aspects. Future research should consider exploring these dimensions within psychopathy to provide a more nuanced understanding of how it relates to mental toughness.
4.4 Theoretical and practical implications
This meta-analysis substantively augments existing research exploring the nexus between personality traits and mental toughness, affirming that individuals with Dark Triad traits exhibit varying degrees of mental toughness, which is positively correlated only with narcissism and is unrelated to Machiavellianism and psychopathy. Our study not only synthesizes a comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis of all pertinent prior research, but also deepens the understanding of subjective mental toughness within the Dark Triad framework, highlighting extensive opportunities for future inquiries in this domain.
Prior research has elucidated that Machiavellianism and psychopathy together form what is referred to as the Dark Dyad, distinct from narcissism, which aligns more closely yet separately with this dyad (Papageorgiou et al., 2019b; Rogoza and Cieciuch, 2020). Our findings further delineate these differences, revealing a strong association between narcissism and mental toughness, a correlation not observed with Machiavellianism and psychopathy. This differentiation underscores the critical need to examine the three domains of the Dark Triad as distinct yet interrelated constructs, each contributing uniquely to the psychological landscape (Maples et al., 2014; ).
Beyond its theoretical implications, the positive correlation between narcissism and mental toughness corresponds with the emerging discourse on the “bright side” of narcissism, which is perceived as the most benign element of the Dark Triad, endowed with more adaptive qualities (Rauthmann and Kolar, 2012; ). This aspect of narcissism is positive associated with physical health (Sedikides et al., 2004), cognitive empathy () and happiness (Zheng and MacCann, 2023). At its core, narcissism involves a profound level of self-enhancement, where individuals maintain an inflated self-view that not only boosts their self-esteem but also propels them toward ambitious achievements (Morf and Rhodewalt, 1993; Sedikides, 2021). This trait has significant implications for leadership, with narcissistic leaders often driving better organizational performance through innovative strategies (). The underlying motivation for narcissists’ behaviors stems from their need to manage a fragile self-esteem, necessitating continual affirmation (Zeigler-Hill, 2006). As such, narcissists engage in immediate gratification behaviors, typically overlooking long-term repercussions (Morf and Rhodewalt, 2001). Yet, when successful, narcissists demonstrate a high degree of proactivity, unwavering belief in their capabilities, and a relentless pursuit of their objectives, epitomizing psychological toughness (; Paleczek et al., 2018; Prusik and Szulawski, 2019). In particular, subgroup analyses reveal that the strongest link between narcissism and mental toughness manifests in leadership roles, underscoring the importance of this trait in organizational settings.
However, it is crucial to acknowledge that our analysis predominantly focused on grandiose narcissism. Research on the interactions between vulnerable narcissism and mental toughness remains scant, highlighting a significant gap that future studies need to address.
4.5 Limitations and future directions
This meta-analysis underscores several limitations inherent in the current body of research on the Dark Triad and mental toughness, notably concerning the methodologies employed. The reliance on self-report questionnaires for assessing mental toughness may introduce self-presentation or self-evaluation biases, particularly among individuals with high narcissistic traits who may overestimate their capabilities (). To mitigate these biases, future research should consider alternative methods such as the Experience Sampling Method (ESM), which can reduce self-presentation biases significantly (), or utilize informant ratings to provide less biased reports of traits and experiences.
Moreover, the scope of research examining the intricate relationship between the Dark Triad traits and mental toughness is notably limited. This review reveals a particular scarcity of studies focusing on Machiavellianism and psychopathy. The existing studies predominantly assess these traits at a broad domain level, which constrains the depth of analysis into more nuanced relationships that might vary significantly across different subtypes or facets of these traits. Our findings indicate that while the significant positive correlation between narcissism and mental toughness may reflect the explicit inclusion of grandiose narcissism in common scales, the near-zero associations observed with Machiavellianism and psychopathy could stem from the limitations of the DDTD and SD3 scales. These scales may not adequately differentiate the finer dimensions of these traits.
Given these considerations, future research should employ more granular assessments that detail the relationships between each Dark Triad domain and mental toughness, focusing on specific aspects or subtypes to enhance understanding of these complex associations.
Additionally, gender has emerged as a significant moderating variable; however, our analysis was constrained by the mixed-gender composition of the sample pools, with many studies failing to report separate data for males and females. Future studies should aim to report correlation coefficients separately by gender to allow for more precise subgroup analyses and enhance the generalizability of the findings.
5 Conclusion
This systematic review and meta-analysis constitute the first exhaustive assessment of the interrelations between Dark Triad traits and mental toughness. Our findings reveal a significant association between narcissism and mental toughness. In contrast, no substantial evidence was found to support a similar link with Machiavellianism or psychopathy. This study critically consolidates existing literature while elucidating the intricate dynamics between personality traits and mental toughness.
However, the breadth of our insights is limited by various factors, including the sample sizes and the inability of the scales used to distinctly capture sub-dimensions of the Dark Triad traits. Given these limitations, it is imperative for future research to refine these methodological aspects. We advocate for more nuanced investigations that could enhance our understanding of how distinct facets of the Dark Triad correlate with mental toughness, potentially guiding targeted interventions in personality psychology.
Statements
Data availability statement
The datasets presented in this study can be found in online repositories. The names of the repository/repositories and accession number(s) can be found in the article/supplementary material.
Author contributions
TL: Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Resources, Software, Supervision, Validation, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. XW: Funding acquisition, Project administration, Writing – review & editing. SN: Project administration, Supervision, Writing – original draft. XX: Writing – review & editing, Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis. ZN: Project administration, Supervision, Investigation, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing, Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Methodology, Resources, Validation.
Funding
The author(s) declare that financial support was received for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article. The publication fees for this manuscript were provided by the Hainan Normal University.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
References
1
AinslieG. (1975). Specious reward: a behavioral theory of impulsiveness and impulse control. Psychol. Bull.82, 463–496. doi: 10.1037/h0076860
2
AmesD. R.RoseP.AndersonC. P. (2006). The NPI-16 as a short measure of narcissism. J. Res. Pers.40, 440–450. doi: 10.1016/j.jrp.2005.03.002
3
AndreassenC. S.UrsinH.EriksenH. R.PallesenS. (2012). The relationship of narcissism with Workaholism, work engagement, and professional position. Soc. Behav. Personal. Int. J.40, 881–890. doi: 10.2224/sbp.2012.40.6.881
4
AshtonM. C.LeeK.PeruginiM.SzarotaP.De VriesR. E.Di BlasL.et al. (2004). A six-factor structure of personality-descriptive adjectives: solutions from Psycholexical studies in seven languages. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol.86, 356–366. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.86.2.356
5
BackM. D.KüfnerA. C. P.DufnerM.GerlachT. M.RauthmannJ. F.DenissenJ. J. A. (2013). Narcissistic admiration and rivalry: disentangling the bright and dark sides of narcissism. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol.105, 1013–1037. doi: 10.1037/a0034431
6
BaughmanH. M.JonasonP. K.VernonP. A. (2016). Relationships between the dark triad and delayed gratification: an evolutionary perspective. Pers. Indiv. Differ.101:467. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2016.05.087
7
BaumeisterR. F.VohsK. D. (2001). Narcissism as addiction to esteem. Psychol. Inq.12, 206–210. Available at: https://www.jstor.org/stable/1449473
8
BergJ. M.SmithS. F.WattsA. L.AmmiratiR.GreenS. E.LilienfeldS. O. (2013). Misconceptions regarding psychopathic personality: implications for clinical practice and research. Neuropsychiatry3, 63–74. doi: 10.2217/npy.12.69
9
BirchP. D. J.CramptonS.GreenleesI.LowryR.CoffeeP. (2017). The mental toughness questionnaire-48: a re-examination of factorial validity. Int. J. Sport Psychol. 3, 331–355. Available at: https://www.jstor.org/stable/1449473
10
BirkásB.CsathóÁ.GácsB.BereczkeiT. (2015). Nothing ventured nothing gained: strong associations between reward sensitivity and two measures of Machiavellianism. Pers. Indiv. Differ.74, 112–115. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2014.09.046
11
BlickleG.KückelhausB. P.KranefeldI.SchütteN.GenauH. A.Gansen-AmmannD.-N.et al. (2020). Political skill camouflages Machiavellianism: career role performance and organizational misbehavior at short and long tenure. J. Vocat. Behav.118:103401. doi: 10.1016/j.jvb.2020.103401
12
BorensteinM.HedgesL. V.HigginsJ. P. T.RothsteinH. R. (2010). A basic introduction to fixed-effect and random-effects models for meta-analysis. Res. Synth. Methods1, 97–111. doi: 10.1002/jrsm.12
13
BraunS. (2017). Leader narcissism and outcomes in organizations: a review at multiple levels of analysis and implications for future research. Front. Psychol.8, 773. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00773
14
BrunellA. B.GentryW. A.CampbellW. K.HoffmanB. J.KuhnertK. W.DeMarreeK. G. (2008). Leader emergence: the case of the narcissistic leader. Personal. Soc. Psychol. Bull.34, 1663–1676. doi: 10.1177/0146167208324101
15
BullS. J.ShambrookC. J.JamesW.BrooksJ. E. (2005). Towards an understanding of mental toughness in elite English cricketers. J. Appl. Sport Psychol.17, 209–227. doi: 10.1080/10413200591010085
16
CampbellW. K.BaumeisterR. F. (2006). “Narcissistic personality disorder” in Practitioner’s guide to evidence-based psychotherapy. eds. FisherJ. E.O’DonohueW. T. (Boston, MA: Springer US), 423–431.
17
CampbellW. K.MillerJ. D. (2011). The handbook of narcissism and narcissistic personality disorder: theoretical approaches, empirical findings, and treatments, 1st ed. Wiley and New York. doi: 10.1002/9781118093108
18
CampbellW. K.RudichE. A.SedikidesC. (2002). Narcissism, self-esteem, and the positivity of self-views: two portraits of self-love. Pers. Soc. Psychol. B.28, 358–368. doi: 10.1177/0146167202286007
19
CarréJ. R.JonesD. N.MuellerS. M. (2020). Perceiving opportunities for legal and illegal profit: Machiavellianism and the dark triad. Pers. Indiv. Differ.162:109942. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2020.109942
20
ChatterjeeA.HambrickD. C. (2007). It’s all about me: narcissistic chief executive officers and their effects on company strategy and performance. Adm. Sci. Q.52, 351–386. doi: 10.2189/asqu.52.3.351
21
ChatterjeeA.PollockT. G. (2017). Master of puppets: how narcissistic CEOs construct their professional worlds. Acad. Manag. Rev.42, 703–725. doi: 10.5465/amr.2015.0224
22
ChristieR. (1970a). Why Machiavelli? in: studies in Machiavellianism: Elsevier, 1–9. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-174450-2.50006-3
23
ChristieR. (1970b). Scale Construction, in: studies in Machiavellianism: Elsevier, 34. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-174450-2.50007-5
24
CloughP.EarleK.SewellD. (2002). Mental toughness: the concept and its measurement. Sol. Sport Psychol.1, 32–45.
25
CookeD. J.MichieC. (2001). Refining the construct of psychopathy: towards a hierarchical model. Psychol. Assess.13, 171–188. doi: 10.1037/1040-3590.13.2.171
26
CroneE. A.VendelI.Van Der MolenM. W. (2003). Decision-making in disinhibited adolescents and adults: insensitivity to future consequences or driven by immediate reward?Personal. Individ. Differ.35, 1625–1641. doi: 10.1016/S0191-8869(02)00386-0
27
CryselL. C.CrosierB. S.WebsterG. D. (2013). The dark triad and risk behavior. Personal. Individ. Differ.54, 35–40. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2012.07.029
28
CsikszentmihalyiM.LarsonR. (1987). Validity and reliability of the experience-sampling method. J. Nerv. Ment. Dis.175, 526–536. doi: 10.1097/00005053-198709000-00004
29
DagnallN.DenovanA.PapageorgiouK. A.CloughP. J.ParkerA.DrinkwaterK. G. (2019). Psychometric assessment of shortened mental toughness questionnaires (MTQ): factor structure of the MTQ-18 and the MTQ-10. Front. Psychol.10:1933. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01933
30
Den HartogD. N.De HooghA. H. B.BelschakF. D. (2020). Toot your own horn? Leader narcissism and the effectiveness of employee self-promotion. J. Manag.46, 261–286. doi: 10.1177/0149206318785240
31
DenovanA.DagnallN.ArtamonovaE.PapageorgiouK. A. (2021). Dark triad traits, learning styles, and symptoms of depression: assessing the contribution of mental toughness longitudinally. Learn. Individ. Differ.91:102053. doi: 10.1016/j.lindif.2021.102053
32
DinićB. M.PetrovićB.JonasonP. K. (2018). Serbian adaptations of the dark triad dirty dozen (DTDD) and short dark triad (SD3). Pers. Indiv. Differ.134, 321–328. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2018.06.018
33
DuradoniM.GursesliM. C.FiorenzaM.DonatiA.GuazziniA. (2023). Cognitive empathy and the dark triad: a literature review. Eur. J. Invest. Health Psychol. Educ.13, 2642–2680. doi: 10.3390/ejihpe13110184
34
DuvalS.TweedieR. (2000). Trim and fill: a simple funnel-plot–based method of testing and adjusting for publication Bias in Meta-analysis. Biometrics56, 455–463. doi: 10.1111/j.0006-341X.2000.00455.x
35
EggerM.SmithG. D.SchneiderM.MinderC. (1997). Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. BMJ315, 629–634. doi: 10.1136/bmj.315.7109.629
36
FigueredoA. J.VásquezG.BrumbachB. H.SefcekJ. A.KirsnerB. R.JacobsW. J. (2005). The K-factor: individual differences in life history strategy. Pers. Indiv. Differ.39, 1349–1360. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2005.06.009
37
FigueredoA. J.WoodleyM. A.FernandesH. B. F. (2014). Life history selection and phenotypic diversification. Psychol. Inq.25, 325–329. doi: 10.1080/1047840X.2014.920596
38
FurnhamA. (2016). The elephant in the boardroom: The causes of leadership derailment: Springer, New York.
39
FurnhamA.RichardsS. C.PaulhusD. L. (2013). The dark triad of personality: a 10 year review: dark triad of personality. Soc. Personal. Psychol. Compass7, 199–216. doi: 10.1111/spc3.12018
40
GabrielM. T.CritelliJ. W.EeJ. S. (1994). Narcissistic illusions in self-evaluations of intelligence and attractiveness. J. Pers.62, 143–155. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.1994.tb00798.x
41
GeisF. L.MoonT. H. (1981). Machiavellianism and deception. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol.41, 766–775. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.41.4.766
42
GrapsasS.BrummelmanE.BackM. D.DenissenJ. J. A. (2020). The “why” and “how” of narcissism: a process model of narcissistic status pursuit. Perspect. Psychol. Sci.15, 150–172. doi: 10.1177/1745691619873350
43
GucciardiD.F., (2014). When the going gets tough: Mental toughness and its relationship with behavioural perseverance.
44
GucciardiD. F. (2018). Commentary: mental toughness and individual differences in learning, educational and work performance, psychological well-being, and personality: a systematic review. Front. Psychol.8:2329. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.02329
45
GucciardiD. F.GordonS. (2009). Development and preliminary validation of the cricket mental toughness inventory (CMTI). J. Sports Sci.27, 1293–1310. doi: 10.1080/02640410903242306
46
GucciardiD. F.GordonS.DimmockJ. A. (2009). Evaluation of a mental toughness training program for youth-aged Australian footballers: I. A quantitative analysis. J. Appl. Sport Psychol.21, 307–323. doi: 10.1080/10413200903026066
47
GucciardiD. F.HantonS.GordonS.MallettC. J.TembyP. (2015). The concept of mental toughness: tests of dimensionality, Nomological network, and Traitness. J. Pers.83, 26–44. doi: 10.1111/jopy.12079
48
HareR. D. (1985). Comparison of procedures for the assessment of psychopathy. J. Consult. Clin. Psychol.53, 7–16. doi: 10.1037/0022-006X.53.1.7
49
HareR. D. (1999). Without conscience: The disturbing world of the psychopaths among us: Guilford Press, New York.
50
HartS. D.HareR. D.HarpurT. J. (1992). “The psychopathy checklist—revised (PCL-R)” in Advances in psychological assessment. eds. RosenJ. C.McReynoldsP. (Boston, MA: Springer US), 103–130.
51
HemphillJ. F.HareR. D.WongS. (1998). Psychopathy and recidivism: a review. Leg. Criminol. Psychol.3, 139–170. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8333.1998.tb00355.x
52
HigginsJ. P. T. (2003). Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. BMJ327, 557–560. doi: 10.1136/bmj.327.7414.557
53
HoganJ.BarrettP.HoganR. (2007). Personality measurement, faking, and employment selection. J. Appl. Psychol.92, 1270–1285. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.92.5.1270
54
JakobwitzS.EganV. (2006). The dark triad and normal personality traits. Personal. Individ. Differ.40, 331–339. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2005.07.006
55
JonasonP. K.DuineveldJ. J.MiddletonJ. P. (2015). Pathology, pseudopathology, and the dark triad of personality. Personal. Individ. Differ.78, 43–47. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2015.01.028
56
JonasonP. K.FerrellJ. D. (2016). Looking under the hood: the psychogenic motivational foundations of the dark triad. Personal. Individ. Differ.94, 324–331. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2016.01.039
57
JonasonP. K.KoenigB. L.TostJ. (2010). Living a fast life: the dark triad and life history theory. Hum. Nature21, 428–442. doi: 10.1007/s12110-010-9102-4
58
JonasonP. K.TostJ. (2010). I just cannot control myself: the dark triad and self-control. Personal. Individ. Differ.49, 611–615. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2010.05.031
59
JonasonP. K.WebsterG. D. (2010). The dirty dozen: a concise measure of the dark triad. Psychol. Assessment22, 420–432. doi: 10.1037/a0019265
60
JonasonP. K.WebsterG. D. (2012). A protean approach to social influence: dark triad personalities and social influence tactics. Personal. Individ. Differ.52, 521–526. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2011.11.023
61
JonesD. N.FigueredoA. J. (2013). The Core of darkness: uncovering the heart of the dark triad. Eur. J. Personal.27, 521–531. doi: 10.1002/per.1893
62
JonesG.HantonS.ConnaughtonD. (2002). What is this thing called mental toughness? An investigation of elite sport performers. J. Appl. Sport Psychol.14, 205–218. doi: 10.1080/10413200290103509
63
JonesD. N.PaulhusD. L. (2010). “Differentiating the dark triad within the interpersonal Circumplex” in Handbook of interpersonal psychology (John Wiley & Sons, Ltd: New York), 249–267. doi: 10.1002/9781118001868.ch15
64
JonesD. N.PaulhusD. L. (2014). Introducing the short dark triad (SD3): a brief measure of dark personality traits. Assessment21, 28–41. doi: 10.1177/1073191113514105
65
KaufmanS. B.YadenD. B.HydeE.TsukayamaE. (2019). The light vs. dark triad of personality: contrasting two very different profiles of human nature. Front. Psychol.10:467. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00467
66
KilduffG. J.GalinskyA. D. (2017). The spark that ignites: mere exposure to rivals increases Machiavellianism and unethical behavior. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol.69, 156–162. doi: 10.1016/j.jesp.2016.10.007
67
KinradeC.HartW.LambertJ. T. (2022). Mental toughness, rather than self-esteem, moderates effects of grandiose narcissism on aggression under conditions of ego-threat. Pers. Indiv. Differ.189:111518. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2022.111518
68
KraftP. S. (2022). The double-edged sword of CEO narcissism: a meta-analysis of innovation and firm performance implications. J. Prod. Innov. Manag.39, 749–772. doi: 10.1111/jpim.12649
69
KranefeldI. (2023). Psychopathy in positions of power: the moderating role of position power in the relation between psychopathic meanness and leadership outcomes. Personal. Individ. Differ.200:111916. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2022.111916
70
KunÁ.SzabóZ.P.BaloghB., (2021). The bright side of the dark triad leaders: The relationship between dark personality traits, mental toughness, resilience, and character strengths.
71
LearyT. (2004). Interpersonal diagnosis of personality: A functional theory and methodology for personality evaluation: Wipf and Stock Publishers: Eugene, Oregon.
72
LebudaI.FiguraB.KarwowskiM. (2021). Creativity and the dark triad: a meta-analysis. J. Res. Pers.92:104088. doi: 10.1016/j.jrp.2021.104088
73
LeeK.AshtonM. C. (2005). Psychopathy, Machiavellianism, and narcissism in the five-factor model and the HEXACO model of personality structure. Pers. Indiv. Differ.38, 1571–1582. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2004.09.016
74
LeeK.AshtonM. C. (2014). The dark triad, the big five, and the HEXACO model. Personal. Individ. Differ.67, 2–5. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2014.01.048
75
LeeK.AshtonM. C.WiltshireJ.BourdageJ. S.VisserB. A.GallucciA. (2013). Sex, power, and money: prediction from the dark triad and honesty–humility. Eur. J. Personal.27, 169–184. doi: 10.1002/per.1860
76
LeeM.KimB. (2023). Effect of the employees’ mental toughness on organizational commitment and job satisfaction: mediating psychological well-being. Admin. Sci.13:133. doi: 10.3390/admsci13050133
77
LilienfeldS. O.AndrewsB. P. (1996). Development and preliminary validation of a self-report measure of psychopathic personality traits in noncriminal population. J. Pers. Assess.66, 488–524. doi: 10.1207/s15327752jpa6603_3
78
LinY.MutzJ.CloughP. J.PapageorgiouK. A. (2017). Mental toughness and individual differences in learning, educational and work performance, psychological well-being, and personality: a systematic review. Front. Psychol.8:1345. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01345
79
LynamD. R.MillerJ. D. (2012). Fearless dominance and psychopathy: a response to Lilienfeld et al. personality disorders: theory, research, and treatment3, 341–353. doi: 10.1037/a0028296
80
MaleszaM.OstaszewskiP. (2016). Dark side of impulsivity — associations between the dark triad, self-report and behavioral measures of impulsivity. Personal. Individ. Differ.88, 197–201. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2015.09.016
81
ManleyH.JarukasemthaweeS.PisitsungkagarnK. (2019). The effect of narcissistic admiration and rivalry on mental toughness. Pers. Indiv. Differ.148, 1–6. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2019.05.009
82
MaplesJ. L.LamkinJ.MillerJ. D. (2014). A test of two brief measures of the dark triad: the dirty dozen and short dark triad. Psychol. Assess.26, 326–331. doi: 10.1037/a0035084
83
MillerJ. D.HoffmanB. J.GaughanE. T.GentileB.MaplesJ.Keith CampbellW. (2011). Grandiose and vulnerable narcissism: a Nomological network analysis: variants of narcissism. J. Pers.79, 1013–1042. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.2010.00711.x
84
MiloševićM.BožovićB.DopsajM. (2022). Psychometric properties of the Serbian version of mental toughness inventory and dark triad dirty dozen in police students. NBP. Nauka bezbednosti policija27, 14–28. doi: 10.5937/nabepo27-36389
85
MoherD.LiberatiA.TetzlaffJ.AltmanD. G.the PRISMA Group (2009). Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and Meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. Ann. Intern. Med.151, 264–269. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-151-4-200908180-00135
86
MorfC. C.RhodewaltF. (1993). Narcissism and self-evaluation maintenance: explorations in object relations. Pers. Soc. Psychol. B.19, 668–676. doi: 10.1177/0146167293196001
87
MorfC. C.RhodewaltF. (2001). Unraveling the paradoxes of narcissism: a dynamic self-regulatory processing model. Psychol. Inq.12, 177–196. doi: 10.1207/S15327965PLI1204_1
88
NathansonC.PaulhusD. L.WilliamsK. M. (2006). Predictors of a behavioral measure of scholastic cheating: personality and competence but not demographics. Contemp. Educ. Psychol.31, 97–122. doi: 10.1016/j.cedpsych.2005.03.001
89
NeumannC. S.KaufmanS. B.Ten BrinkeL.YadenD. B.HydeE.TsykayamaE. (2020). Light and dark trait subtypes of human personality – a multi-study person-centered approach. Personal. Individ. Differ.164:110121. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2020.110121
90
NichollsA. R.MadiganD. J.BackhouseS. H.LevyA. R. (2017). Personality traits and performance enhancing drugs: the dark triad and doping attitudes among competitive athletes. Personal. Individ. Differ.112, 113–116. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2017.02.062
91
PaleczekD.BergnerS.RybnicekR. (2018). Predicting career success: is the dark side of personality worth considering?J. Manage. Psychol.33, 437–456. doi: 10.1108/JMP-11-2017-0402
92
PapageorgiouK. A.BeniniE.BilelloD.GianniouF.CloughP. J.CostantiniG. (2019a). Bridging the gap: a network approach to dark triad, mental toughness, the big five, and perceived stress. J. Pers.87, 1250–1263. doi: 10.1111/jopy.12472
93
PapageorgiouK. A.DenovanA.DagnallN.Hill-ArtamonovaE.GianniouF.-M.PapageorgiouS.et al. (2023). Grandiose narcissism indirectly associates with lower psychopathology across five countries. J. Psychiatr. Res.167, 78–85. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2023.10.003
94
PapageorgiouK. A.GianniouF.-M.WilsonP.MonetaG. B.BilelloD.CloughP. J. (2019b). The bright side of dark: exploring the positive effect of narcissism on perceived stress through mental toughness. Personal. Individ. Differ.139, 116–124. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2018.11.004
95
PapageorgiouK. A.MalanchiniM.DenovanA.CloughP. J.ShakeshaftN.SchofieldK.et al. (2018a). Longitudinal associations between narcissism, mental toughness and school achievement. Pers. Indiv. Differ.131, 105–110. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2018.04.024
96
PapageorgiouK. A.WongB.CloughP. J. (2017). Beyond good and evil: exploring the mediating role of mental toughness on the dark triad of personality traits. Pers. Indiv. Differ.119, 19–23. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2017.06.031
97
PatrickC. J.FowlesD. C.KruegerR. F. (2009). Triarchic conceptualization of psychopathy: developmental origins of disinhibition, boldness, and meanness. Dev. Psychopathol.21, 913–938. doi: 10.1017/S0954579409000492
98
PaulhusD. L. (2014). Toward a taxonomy of dark personalities. Curr. Dir. Psychol. Sci.23, 421–426. doi: 10.1177/0963721414547737
99
PaulhusD.L., (2020). Screening for dark personalities: the short dark tetrad (SD4).
100
PaulhusD. L.WilliamsK. M. (2002). The dark triad of personality: narcissism, Machiavellianism, and psychopathy. J. Res. Pers.36, 556–563. doi: 10.1016/S0092-6566(02)00505-6
101
PerryJ. L.StrycharczykD.DagnallN.DenovanA.PapageorgiouK. A.CloughP. J. (2021). Dimensionality of the mental toughness questionnaire (MTQ48). Front. Psychol.12:654836. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.654836
102
PotgieterJ. R. (2013). Cheating: the dark side of sport. South Afr. J. Res. Sport Phys. Educ. Recreat.35, 153–162. doi: 10.10520/EJC144093
103
PrusikM.SzulawskiM. (2019). The relationship between the dark triad personality traits, motivation at work, and burnout among HR recruitment workers. Front. Psychol.10:1290. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01290
104
RaskinR. N.HallC. S. (1979). A narcissistic personality inventory. Psychol. Rep.45:590. doi: 10.2466/pr0.1979.45.2.590
105
RauthmannJ. F.KolarG. P. (2012). How “dark” are the dark triad traits? Examining the perceived darkness of narcissism, Machiavellianism, and psychopathy. Personal. Individ. Differ.53, 884–889. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2012.06.020
106
RodriguesD.RodriguesN.RebeloT. (2023). Extending the understanding of the impact of conscientiousness on individual soccer performance: examining the mediating role of mental toughness. Curr. Issues Pers. Psychol.12, 140–151. doi: 10.5114/cipp/163181
107
RogozaR.CieciuchJ. (2020). Dark triad traits and their structure: an empirical approach. Curr. Psychol.39, 1287–1302. doi: 10.1007/s12144-018-9834-6
108
RogozaR.Żemojtel-PiotrowskaM.KwiatkowskaM. M.KwiatkowskaK. (2018). The bright, the dark, and the blue face of narcissism: the Spectrum of narcissism in its relations to the Metatraits of personality, self-esteem, and the Nomological network of shyness, loneliness, and empathy. Front. Psychol.9. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00343
109
RosenthalS. A.PittinskyT. L. (2006). Narcissistic leadership. Leadersh. Q.17, 617–633. doi: 10.1016/j.leaqua.2006.10.005
110
RuparelN. (2020). Mental toughness: promising new paradigms for the workplace. Cogent Psychol.7:1722354. doi: 10.1080/23311908.2020.1722354
111
RuparelN.ChoubisaR.SethH.DubeyS. (2023). Mental toughness for employees: towards conceptual clarity and scale development. Int. J. Product. Perform. Manag.72, 1791–1818. doi: 10.1108/IJPPM-01-2021-0011
112
RyersonM. K. (2018). The relationship between the dark tetrad using the HEXACO personality models in relationship to mental toughness in college athletes: Abilene Christian University, Abilene, Texas.
113
SabouriS.GerberM.Sadeghi BahmaniD.LemolaS.CloughP.KalakN.et al. (2016). Examining dark triad traits in relation to mental toughness and physical activity in young adults. Neuropsych. Dis. Treat.12, 229–235. doi: 10.2147/NDT.S97267
114
SchoenleberM.SadehN.VeronaE. (2011). Parallel syndromes: two dimensions of narcissism and the facets of psychopathic personality in criminally involved individuals. Personal. Disord. Theory Res. Treat.2, 113–127. doi: 10.1037/a0021870
115
SedikidesC. (2021). In search of Narcissus. Trends Cogn. Sci.25, 67–80. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2020.10.010
116
SedikidesC.RudichE. A.GreggA. P.KumashiroM.RusbultC. (2004). Are normal narcissists psychologically healthy?: self-esteem matters. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol.87, 400–416. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.87.3.400
117
SheardM.GolbyJ.van WerschA. (2009). Progress toward construct validation of the sports mental toughness questionnaire (SMTQ). Eur. J. Psychol. Assess.25, 186–193. doi: 10.1027/1015-5759.25.3.186
118
SleepC. E.WeissB.LynamD. R.MillerJ. D. (2019). An examination of the Triarchic model of psychopathy’s nomological network: a meta-analytic review. Clin. Psychol. Rev.71, 1–26. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2019.04.005
119
SmithM. M.SherryS. B.ChenS.SaklofskeD. H.FlettG. L.HewittP. L. (2016). Perfectionism and narcissism: a meta-analytic review. J. Res. Pers.64, 90–101. doi: 10.1016/j.jrp.2016.07.012
120
SuhartiL.KurniawatiR. P. (2023). Mental toughness and competitive performance of Indonesian hotel supervisors. SA J. Hum. Resour. Manag.26:a2244. doi: 10.4102/sajhrm.v21i0.2244
121
SzabóZ. P.KunÁ.BaloghB. E.SimonE.CsikeT. (2022). Dark and strong?! The associations between dark personality traits, mental toughness and resilience in Hungarian student, employee, leader, and military samples. Pers. Indiv. Differ.186:111339. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2021.111339
122
TafarodiR. W.MilneA. B. (2002). Decomposing global self-esteem. J. Pers.70, 443–484. doi: 10.1111/1467-6494.05017
123
TafarodiR. W.SwannW. B.Jr. (1995). Self-linking and self-competence as dimensions of global self-esteem: initial validation of a measure. J. Pers. Assess.65, 322–342. doi: 10.1207/s15327752jpa6502_8
124
ThelwellR.WestonN.GreenleesI. (2005). Defining and understanding mental toughness within soccer. J. Appl. Sport Psychol.17, 326–332. doi: 10.1080/10413200500313636
125
TibbertS. J. (2013). Mental toughness and overtraining behaviours (Doctoral dissertation).Victoria University, Sydney.
126
TruhanT. E.GianniouF.-M.PapageorgiouK. A. (2022). Differences in psychiatric symptoms between the UK and Greece prior to and during COVID-19: the roles of subclinical narcissism and mental toughness. Pers. Indiv. Differ.185:111308. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2021.111308
127
TruhanT. E.WilsonP.MõttusR.PapageorgiouK. A. (2021). The many faces of dark personalities: an examination of the dark triad structure using psychometric network analysis. Pers. Indiv. Differ.171:110502. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2020.110502
128
TurnerC. F.MartinezD. C. (1977). Socioeconomic achievement and the Machiavellian personality. Sociometry40, 325–336. doi: 10.2307/3033481
129
VaughanR.CarterG. L.CockroftD.MaggioriniL. (2018). Harder, better, faster, stronger? Mental toughness, the dark triad and physical activity. Pers. Indiv. Differ.131, 206–211. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2018.05.002
130
VeselkaL.SchermerJ. A.PetridesK. V.VernonP. A. (2009). Evidence for a heritable general factor of personality in two studies. Twin Res. Hum. Genet.12, 254–260. doi: 10.1375/twin.12.3.254
131
WallaceH. M.ReadyC. B.WeitenhagenE. (2009). Narcissism and task persistence. Rutg. Self Soc. Id.8, 78–93. doi: 10.1080/15298860802194346
132
WilliamsK. M.NathansonC.PaulhusD. L. (2010). Identifying and profiling scholastic cheaters: their personality, cognitive ability, and motivation. J. Exp. Psychol. Appl.16, 293–307. doi: 10.1037/a0020773
133
WilsonD. S.NearD.MillerR. R. (1996). Machiavellianism: a synthesis of the evolutionary and psychological literatures. Psychol. Bull.119, 285–299. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.119.2.285
134
WinkP. (1991). Two faces of narcissism. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol.61, 590–597. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.61.4.590
135
YankovG. P.DavenportN.ShermanR. A. (2019). Locating mental toughness in factor models of personality. Personal. Individ. Differ.151:109532. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2019.109532
136
YatesA. (1996). Athletes, eating disorders, and the overtraining syndrome, in: Activity anorexia: Psychology Press, London.
137
Zamani SaniS. H.Sadeghi-BahmaniD.FathirezaieZ.AghdasiM. T.AbbaspourK.BadicuG.et al. (2022). Gender differences and relationship of 2D:4D-ratio, mental toughness and dark triad traits among active young adults. Biology11:864. doi: 10.3390/biology11060864
138
Zeigler-HillV. (2006). Discrepancies between implicit and explicit self-esteem: implications for narcissism and self-esteem instability. J. Pers.74, 119–144. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.2005.00371.x
139
Zeigler-HillV.VrabelJ. K.McCabeG. A.CosbyC. A.TraederC. K.HobbsK. A.et al. (2019). Narcissism and the pursuit of status. J. Pers.87, 310–327. doi: 10.1111/jopy.12392
140
ZhengA. H.MacCannC. (2023). Happiness is associated with higher narcissism but lower psychopathy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of the relationship between happiness and the dark triad. Personal. Individ. Differ.215:112381. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2023.112381
Summary
Keywords
dark triad, narcissism, machiavellanism, psychopathy, mental toughness, meta - analysis
Citation
Liang T, Wang X, Ng S, Xu X and Ning Z (2024) The dark side of mental toughness: a meta-analysis of the relationship between the dark triad traits and mental toughness. Front. Psychol. 15:1403530. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1403530
Received
19 March 2024
Accepted
01 July 2024
Published
18 July 2024
Volume
15 - 2024
Edited by
Bojana M. Dinic, University of Novi Sad, Serbia
Reviewed by
Marco Giancola, University of L’Aquila, Italy
Asanka Bulathwatta, University of Peradeniya, Sri Lanka
Updates
Copyright
© 2024 Liang, Wang, Ng, Xu and Ning.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Xianfei Wang, 090206@hainnu.edu.cn
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.