In the published article, there was an error. In the study we used only 23 questions of the SDQ questionnaire due to the emergency period (i.e., 2 items were not applicable in a lockdown situation as we explain in the manuscript), but we have been contacted by the authors of the instrument, as our choice was not permitted within the Copyright Notice of their instrument. As required by the authors of SDQ, it is necessary to insert a note.
A correction has been made to Materials and methods, Strength and difficulties questionnaire, Paragraph 1. This sentence previously stated.
“In this work two items of the Peer Problems Scale were removed (“Picked on or bullied by other children” and “Generally liked by other children”), because in the specific period of the lockdown these aspects were not evaluable.”
The corrected sentence appears below.
“In this work two items of the Peer Problems Scale were removed (“Picked on or bullied by other children” and “Generally liked by other children”), because in the specific period of the lockdown these aspects were not evaluable.2
The following text has been added as Footnote 2.
“2This paper uses data based on the administration of only 23 questions. This is not permitted under the SDQ terms of use, which require users to administer authorized versions of the SDQ in full and without any modification (see Copyright Notice on https://www.sdqinfo.org/). The authors regret this error and commit to abide fully by the SDQ terms of use in future collection of SDQ data.”
The correspondence details of the original article have also been updated. The original email address provided has been replaced with the following: cornaggia13@gmail.com.
The authors apologize for this error and state that this does not change the scientific conclusions of the article in any way. The original article has been updated.
Statements
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Summary
Keywords
children drawings, child development, COVID-19, emotions, relationship, mindreading abilities
Citation
Cornaggia A, Bianco F, Gilli G, Marchetti A, Massaro D and Castelli I (2024) Corrigendum: Children's representations of the COVID-19 lockdown and pandemic through drawings. Front. Psychol. 15:1439212. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1439212
Received
27 May 2024
Accepted
30 May 2024
Published
21 June 2024
Approved by
Frontiers Editorial Office, Frontiers Media SA, Switzerland
Volume
15 - 2024
Updates
Copyright
© 2024 Cornaggia, Bianco, Gilli, Marchetti, Massaro and Castelli.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Alessia Cornaggia cornaggia13@gmail.com
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.