In the published article, there was an error in Figure 2 as published. In the left net diagram, it said “B and T+” (right, bottom), although it should be “nB and T+”. The corrected Figure 2 and its caption appear below.
Figure 2
Visualizations of two binary events in the context of the mammography problem: Probability versions (left) and frequency versions (right).3
The authors apologize for this error and state that this does not change the scientific conclusions of the article in any way. The original article has been updated.
Statements
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Footnotes
3.^ Note that because of the plural “women” in our probability trees (e.g., in Figures 1, 2) these trees are basically percentage trees. However, since research in Bayesian reasoning mostly distinguishes between probability and frequency format, we call them probability trees.
Summary
Keywords
joint probabilities, Bayesian reasoning, natural frequencies, visualization, net diagram
Citation
Stegmüller N, Binder K and Krauss S (2024) Corrigendum: How general is the natural frequency effect? The case of joint probabilities. Front. Psychol. 15:1515434. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1515434
Received
22 October 2024
Accepted
23 October 2024
Published
19 November 2024
Approved by
Frontiers Editorial Office, Frontiers Media SA, Switzerland
Volume
15 - 2024
Updates
Copyright
© 2024 Stegmüller, Binder and Krauss.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Nathalie Stegmüller nathalie.stegmueller@ur.de
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.