Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Psychol.

Sec. Educational Psychology

This article is part of the Research TopicUnderstanding Effective Education: Far Transfer from a Sociocultural and Cognitive Neural PerspectiveView all 8 articles

Grounding Mathematics in an Integrated Conceptual Structure, Part II: Intervention Study Demonstrating Robust Learning and Retention through a Grounded Curriculum

Provisionally accepted
Kevin  W MickeyKevin W Mickey1Laura  Weseman KreiselLaura Weseman Kreisel1Su  SuSu Su1James  L McClellandJames L McClelland2*
  • 1Department of Psychology, School of Humanities and Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, California, United States
  • 2Department of Psychology, Stanford University, Stanford, California, United States

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Mathematical reasoning systems are often treated as systems for manipulating formal expressions according to structure sensitive rules. However, these expressions typically reference objects, properties, and relationships in a target domain in which they have meaning. One case in point is precalculus trigonometry, a crucial part of high-school preparation for university level mathematics. In work reported in Part I of this 2-part publication (Mickey and McClelland, 2025), we found evidence that reliance on the unit circle, a visuospatial structure that provides meaning for formal expressions in trigonometry, provides an integrated conceptual framework that supports successful mastery of foundational trigonometric relationships that are often very difficult for students to learn. Importantly, however, although coverage of the unit circle is standard in classrooms and textbooks, many students fail to rely on it and fail to benefit from the conceptual model it provides. Here, we consider some of the reasons why mastery of this system may be challenging and some of the pitfalls in the ways these relationships are often taught. We then describe a set of principles we used to guide the development of a tutorial curriculum aimed at addressing these challenges and pitfalls. After refinement, our curriculum was successful in allowing many high-school and community college students to learn to solve trigonometric identity problems students often fail to master in typical classroom settings and to retain what they had learned over a 2-3 week delay. Our findings demonstrate the value of developing structured, conceptually grounded, and research-motivated teaching materials to allow students to gain mastery of mathematical systems they might otherwise fail to learn.

Keywords: Visuospatial representation, Learning trigonometry, conceptual grounding, generalization, Transfer Learning, Mathematical Cognition

Received: 08 Oct 2024; Accepted: 13 Nov 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Mickey, Kreisel, Su and McClelland. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: James L McClelland, mcclelland@stanford.edu

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.