- 1School of Psychological Sciences, Faculty of Social Sciences, National Autonomous University of Honduras, Tegucigalpa, Honduras
- 2Department of Pedagogy and Education Sciences, National Autonomous University of Honduras, Tegucigalpa, Honduras
University students face significant mental health challenges exacerbated by barriers such as stigma, financial constraints, and limited services. This study examined barriers to seeking psychological help among 23 students from the National Autonomous University of Honduras (UNAH). Participants were recruited through social media, snowball sampling, and campus visits. Using semi-structured interviews, the research explored attitudes, barriers, and perceptions regarding professional psychological help. Interview guides were expert-validated and pilot-tested. Thematic analysis, conducted from a constructivist perspective, identified four themes: motivators, psychotherapy sources, barriers, and facilitators. Findings revealed that while stigma and financial constraints hinder help-seeking, motivators like personal growth and social influences encourage it. The study highlighted the need for accessible mental health services in university settings to address academic and social pressures. Strengthening these services is essential to fostering a supportive environment that promotes student well-being and psychological resilience.
1 Introduction
The mental health of young people is a constant concern worldwide (Umubyeyi et al., 2016; Bugtong-Diez, 2020; Nakamura et al., 2022), mainly for universities, as mental health issues are becoming increasingly prevalent and students report significant barriers to accessing professional psychological support (Cage et al., 2020). Key factors hindering psychological help-seeking include age, socioeconomic status, normalized mental strain, public and self-stigma, reliance on independence, and preferring support from friends or family over specialists (Topkaya et al., 2016; Worthley et al., 2017; Cha et al., 2019; Ebert et al., 2019; Ibrahim et al., 2019; Shea et al., 2019; Cage et al., 2020; Landa-Blanco et al., 2021; Gündoğdu et al., 2024). Conversely, students who decide to seek help often encounter overburdened university services and may abandon their attempt to obtain immediate care (Dunley and Papadopoulos, 2019; Farrer et al., 2019; Shi et al., 2019; Sweetman et al., 2021; Yánez, 2022).
Regarding mental health issues, accumulated evidence indicates that stress, anxiety, depression, suicidal ideation or tendencies, and distress are among the most prevalent conditions reported by university students themselves (Grøtan et al., 2019; House et al., 2020; Wang et al., 2020; Lipson et al., 2022).
Universities implement comprehensive strategies in psychological services to support all students, prioritizing vulnerable groups facing unique barriers, including ethnicity, sexual orientation, gender identity, and disability (Fernández-Rodríguez et al., 2019; Liu et al., 2019; Williams et al., 2023; Sigal and Plunkett, 2024; Smith and Hebdon, 2024; Zhang et al., 2024). One alternative proposed in the literature is the adoption of virtual care and intervention mechanisms to support student well-being (Ryan et al., 2010; Chen, 2012; Day et al., 2013; Horgan et al., 2013; Levin et al., 2018; Blair et al., 2024). Similarly, social media platforms serve as critical channels for promoting mental health awareness and facilitating connections with professionals in the field (Landa-Blanco et al., 2024a). However, a significant challenge limiting the effectiveness of virtual care is students’ concerns regarding the credibility and privacy of mobile applications designed for these purposes (Levin et al., 2018).
In universities, advancing toward comprehensive psychological care necessitates considering students’ circumstances and the broader context in which they operate (Jackson, 2018). University students face significant mental health challenges, highlighting the need for research to enhance psychological support services. Honduras addresses structural issues like poverty, exclusion, discrimination, and violence, alongside pronounced mental health stigma and access barriers. These factors emphasize the urgency of interventions (Landa-Blanco et al., 2024c). University students face a range of academic, social, and economic pressures, and their mental health needs may go unmet due to cultural, logistical, or financial barriers. A study conducted among students at the National Autonomous University of Honduras (UNAH) revealed that poor sleep quality and low self-esteem are associated with greater barriers to seeking psychological help (Landa-Blanco et al., 2024b).
This study explored the perceived barriers students at the UNAH face when seeking professional psychological help. Using a qualitative, phenomenological approach (Creswell and Poth, 2018), it examined the experiences of students who have accessed mental health services as well as those who have not. The goal was to identify key factors shaping students’ attitudes and behaviors toward seeking psychological support. Specific thematic areas included motivations, facilitators, barriers, and the perceived availability of mental health resources.
2 Methods
2.1 Participants
The primary sample consisted of 23 undergraduate students registered in the UNAH, with 48% (n = 11) identifying as female and 52% (n = 12) as male. Their ages ranged between 18 and 26 years. Participants were recruited through a combination of social media outreach, snowball sampling, and campus visits. The initial aim was to achieve a balanced sample based on sex and prior experience with professional psychological help, including both students who had sought such help (n = 10) and those who had not (n = 10). However, all ten participants without prior experience expressed positive attitudes toward seeking psychological help. To ensure a broader range of perspectives, additional participants explicitly opposed to seeking professional psychological help were recruited. Despite these targeted efforts, only three additional participants meeting this criterion were available for inclusion (see Table 1). Coding and data collection were done in parallel to assess theoretical saturation. The number of new codes generated in every interview was recorded. Although reasonable saturation was achieved by the 12th interview (91% of codes), 11 more interviews were collected to ensure it was properly represented.
To triangulate the data, a discussion group was conducted; five clinical psychologists participated in the discussion. These secondary participants were recruited through the alumni bank of the Master’s Degree in Clinical Psychology at UNAH.
The sample size in this study is considered adequate based on the principles of information power, which suggests that the more information the sample holds relevant to the study aims, the fewer participants are required (Malterud et al., 2016). In this case, the aim was specific and focused: to explore perceived barriers to seeking professional psychological help among university students in Honduras. The sample was also highly specific, consisting of students from a single university, selected based on their experiences with or attitudes toward psychological help-seeking. The study was informed by established theory and prior research on mental health and help-seeking behaviors, which shaped both the interview guides and the analytical approach. The quality of dialogue was ensured through expert-validated, pilot-tested interview guides, in-depth interviews, and the use of member checking. Finally, the thematic analysis employed was rigorous and iterative, including multiple rounds of coding, consensus-building, and triangulation with external experts. Together, these factors support the adequacy of the sample size, and data saturation was confirmed after the 12th interview, with additional interviews conducted to ensure analytical richness.
This study was conducted at UNAH, the country’s largest public university. The research took place within the broader context of a developing nation facing significant structural barriers to mental health care, including stigma, limited access to services, and economic hardship. UNAH students often navigate high academic demands while contending with sociocultural pressures discouraging help-seeking, particularly among men (Landa-Blanco et al., 2024a; Landa-Blanco et al., 2024b; Landa-Blanco et al., 2024c; Landa-Blanco and Mejía Sánchez, 2025). The university setting was chosen due to its diverse student population and because it represents a critical context in which mental health challenges are both prevalent and insufficiently addressed. This setting provided a relevant and rich environment for exploring the perceptions and barriers related to professional psychological help among emerging adults in Honduras.
2.2 Data collection techniques
Two semi-structured interview guides were developed: one for students with prior experience receiving professional psychological help and one for students without such experience. Additionally, a focus group guide was developed for clinical psychologists to gather complementary insights and support data triangulation (see Supplementary material). These guides were then validated by a panel of three experts, comprising a qualitative research expert and two clinical psychologists with relevant research backgrounds. The experts evaluated the questions’ relevance, pertinence, and overall structure, offering suggestions for deletions, modifications, or additions. Following the expert feedback, the revised interview guides were subjected to a pilot testing phase using cognitive interviews with two university students. During these cognitive interviews, participants were asked to respond to the questions and provide feedback on their understanding of the wording, the flow of the questions, and any ambiguities they encountered. This process helped to identify potential misunderstandings or difficulties in interpreting the questions. As a result, further adjustments were made to improve question clarity, refine language, and enhance the overall structure of the guides, ensuring that they were accessible and relevant to the target population.
The interview guide varied depending on whether the respondent had previously sought professional psychological help. Some of the questions included: “What do you think your family and friends think about your decision to attend therapy?,” “Have you faced any issues that made it difficult to continue attending therapy?,” “What are your thoughts on professional psychological help and therapy in general?,” “What do you think are the main reasons some people seek professional psychological help?,” “Do you have any fears or concerns about attending professional psychological help?,” among others.
2.3 Procedures and data analysis
This study was approved by the Research Ethics Committee of the Faculty of Social Sciences (UNAH), under registration number CEIFCS-2023-P2, as part of a broader study of psychosocial wellbeing in university students. The research began with a comprehensive literature review to develop a theoretical framework and identify gaps in understanding students’ perceptions of professional psychological help. Two semi-structured interview guides were crafted to address participants’ perspectives with and without prior experience seeking such help. These guides underwent rigorous validation by a panel of three experts, who assessed their relevance, clarity, and comprehensiveness. Following expert feedback, the guides were refined through cognitive interviews with two university students to resolve any issues with wording or structure, ensuring they were well-aligned with the research objectives.
Data collection involved interviews with participants in person or online using Google Meet. These interviews were conducted between June and July of 2024. Each interview was recorded and transcribed for analysis. All participants signed an informed consent. After each interview, the interviewers conducted a “member check.” During this process, they summarized the key points of the interview and presented this summary to the participant for validation. Participants were invited to provide feedback on the accuracy of the summary and the thematic interpretation. This step enhanced credibility by ensuring the findings accurately reflected the participants’ perspectives and experiences. It allowed participants to correct any inaccuracies and offer additional insights, thereby increasing the trustworthiness of the data. During data collection, all interviewers took detailed field notes, which were scanned and attached to each transcript.
The research team consisted of clinical psychologists, faculty members, and advanced psychology students trained in qualitative research and mental health. Their academic backgrounds and clinical experience enriched the study’s design, interview techniques, and interpretation of data. All interviewers were affiliated with the same university as the participants, which may have influenced participant openness positively due to shared institutional and cultural understanding. At the same time, the team remained reflexive throughout the research process, acknowledging potential biases stemming from their professional commitment to mental health advocacy. To mitigate these influences, the team implemented expert validation of instruments, member checks, peer debriefings, and consensus-based coding. These strategies supported transparency and minimized the impact of presuppositions on data collection and interpretation, enhancing the credibility and transferability of the findings.
The data analysis for this study employed thematic analysis, a qualitative method ideal for identifying patterns within complex data. The process consisted of several stages: initial read-through, initial coding, focused coding, axial coding, and integration. The initial read-through was followed by coding, where the data was categorized into preliminary codes to identify emerging concepts. Focused coding organized these codes into broader themes. Axial coding explored relationships between these themes, and integration synthesized the themes into a cohesive narrative of the study’s findings. This analysis followed a constructivist approach, recognizing that participants’ experiences and meanings are shaped by their social and cultural contexts. The coding process involved multiple rounds of discussion and consensus-building among researchers, ensuring the participants’ perspectives were accurately captured.
To ensure the findings’ dependability, four participants were re-interviewed after the analysis to confirm the relevance of the themes and codes. Their feedback refined and validated the findings. Additionally, the findings were reviewed by a discussion group of five clinical psychologists, adding an external check on the data and minimizing researcher bias. This expert validation, alongside member checks, ensured the findings were grounded in the data and expert knowledge. An audit trail was maintained throughout the study, documenting each research step, including data collection methods, coding decisions, and thematic development. This documentation ensured transparency, rigor, and trustworthiness in the research process.
The research also maintained credibility, dependability, and confirmability through member checks, iterative validation, and expert review. All interviews were conducted in Spanish, and the translations of selected phrases were reviewed and validated by independent researchers and a certified English professor to ensure accuracy. This comprehensive approach strengthened the study’s rigor and ensured the findings accurately reflected participants’ experiences.
3 Results
This research focused on four main themes, from which subthemes and their respective codes emerged through the interviews. The first overarching theme was Motivators, which branched into Positive Motivators and Negative Motivators. The second theme, Available Psychotherapy Sources, included the In-campus Services, Private Practitioners, Public Health Services, and Online Therapy subthemes. The third theme, Barriers to Seeking Psychotherapy, encompassed Cultural factors, Microenvironmental factors, Individual factors, Logistic factors, and Professional Mistrust. Finally, the fourth theme, Facilitators Towards Seeking Psychological Help, was divided into Social Facilitators and Positive Views on Professional Psychological Help (see Figure 1 and Table 2).

Figure 1. Main themes related to the attitudes and experiences of seeking professional psychological help.

Table 2. Themes, subthemes and codes related to the attitudes and experiences of seeking professional psychological help.
3.1 Theme 1: motivators to seek psychological help
Participants identified both positive and negative motivators for seeking therapy. Positive motivators included the desire for self-understanding, emotional balance, and overall well-being. For example, one participant described therapy as a means to “discover qualities that one may be unaware of in difficult situations” (Interview 20). Another emphasized the importance of “emotional balance,” stating that it allows one to “feel better” (Interview 3).
Participants also identified negative motivators, which were often reactive, driven by psychological distress or unresolved emotional issues. Participants mentioned challenges such as difficulty regulating emotions, low self-esteem, anxiety, depression, grief, trauma, and family conflicts as triggers for seeking therapy. The intensity and duration of these symptoms were key factors in motivating individuals to seek help. One participant acknowledged their tendency to delay therapy, stating, “I go when I’m already feeling really bad” (Interview 8). Another reflected on the cumulative effect of unresolved issues, saying, “Over time, all those effects are felt” (Interview 5). The need for emotional release and catharsis was also noted, with one interviewee explaining, “Therapy helps you vent, resolve internal problems, and treat hidden traumas” (Interview 5).
Additionally, the triangulation group reported common issues in therapy consultations, including anxiety, marital problems, depression, grief, suicidal ideation, and behavioral issues, among others. This supports the notion that negative motivators play a significant role in therapy-seeking behavior, as personal challenges—both positive and negative—serve as catalysts for seeking help.
3.2 Theme 2: available psychotherapy sources
In exploring the barriers to seeking psychological help, interviewees highlighted various sources of psychotherapy, each with distinct challenges and advantages. Participants identified five primary sources: in-campus services, non-profit organizations, public health services, private practitioners, and online therapy.
Likewise, the triangulation group stated, “The pandemic has made virtual therapy more common, which makes access easier for some, but also presents challenges for those who do not have access to technology.” This aligns with the interviews, which emphasize that online psychological services have emerged as a viable option, benefiting some individuals by providing access to psychological support.
3.3 Theme 3: barriers to seeking psychotherapy
The barriers to seeking professional psychological help were classified into five themes: Cultural, Microenvironmental, Individual, Logistic, and Deontological. Participants in this study identified several key cultural factors that hinder individuals from pursuing therapy, including stigma, the lack of perceived importance of mental health, male chauvinism (machismo), and the prevalence of physical punishment as a disciplinary method.
Social disapproval and lack of awareness emerge as significant barriers to seeking psychological help. Participants in this study highlighted the negative impact of family and friends’ disapproval of therapy, often fueled by conservative beliefs and misunderstandings about mental health. Additionally, a pervasive lack of information about mental health services further exacerbates these challenges, leaving individuals unsure of where to turn or undervaluing the importance of therapy.
Individual barriers to seeking psychological help can profoundly influence a person’s willingness or ability to engage in therapy. Participants in this study identified several key individual barriers, including resistance to opening up, fear of therapy, concerns about being judged, skepticism about the effectiveness of therapy, discomfort with sharing personal issues with a stranger, and a belief in the sufficiency of self-reliance. Additionally, confusion about the roles of psychologists and psychiatrists and feelings of hopelessness further complicate the decision to seek professional help.
Logistic barriers significantly impact individuals’ ability to access psychological services. Participants in this study highlighted several critical logistical challenges, including financial constraints, location issues, long waitlists, the need for medical referrals, and time management difficulties.
Trust and professionalism are critical factors that can make or break the therapeutic experience, yet participants in this study reported significant concerns in these areas. Issues such as a lack of professionalism, where psychologists are perceived to prioritize financial gain over patient care, and difficulty in establishing rapport, where patients struggle to connect with their therapists, were commonly cited.
The triangulation group identified several barriers to seeking psychological help, including persistent stigmas, such as the fear of being labeled “crazy,” and concerns about confidentiality, especially in sensitive cases like HIV. Despite some progress, stigma and the perception of therapy as unnecessary remain widespread. Bad past experiences with therapists often deter individuals from seeking help. Interviewees echoed these sentiments, noting that cultural stigma and derogatory remarks about therapy seekers reinforce negative perceptions. The microenvironment also plays a role, with limited therapy access and a lack of commitment affecting the therapeutic process. Fear of diagnosis, especially among parents, and the absence of psychoeducation were significant barriers. Resistance to change and a lack of commitment were also noted. Logistic factors, such as costs and therapy location, were also highlighted, with many facing challenges due to limited access and high treatment costs. These findings were consistent with interviewees’ statements about the financial burden and difficulty accessing therapy services. Additionally, due to resource shortages, long waiting lists in public health systems were cited as a significant barrier. The triangulation group noted the lack of investment in prevention and resource limitations, aligning with interviewees’ experiences, which prevent individuals from seeking or continuing therapy.
3.4 Theme 4: facilitators towards seeking psychological help
Participants in this study highlighted how positive experiences shared online and those reported by friends and family have significantly influenced their perceptions of therapy. They also expressed a strong belief in the effectiveness of psychological therapy, viewing it as not only beneficial but also beneficial and essential for mental well-being. This perception is reinforced by recognizing psychologists as highly trained professionals capable of helping individuals navigate complex traumas and problems.
The triangulation group stated, “Establishing a good connection from the first session is essential. Patients come with expectations and fears, and creating a safe and trusting environment is key for them to feel comfortable and continue with therapy. The structure of the therapy and clarity in the process are important for the success of the treatment.” This is consistent with what the interviewees expressed, stating that when therapy is perceived as effective and psychologists are seen as competent professionals, it fosters a positive view of professional psychological help.
3.5 Member check
After each interview, participants were asked to confirm the accuracy of a summary of the key points reflecting their narratives. Once all interviews were analyzed and a draft of the results was completed, four randomly selected respondents participated in a final member check. During this stage, the aggregated results, including themes, subthemes, codes, and interview excerpts, were presented to the participants. They were asked to comment on whether the findings aligned with their perceptions.
The feedback from the final member check supported the validity and relevance of the study’s findings. One participant agreed with the research, emphasizing the importance of emotional support, trust-building with the psychologist, and progress observed over time. They also highlighted barriers such as social judgment, lack of information about therapy, and issues related to cost and accessibility as significant obstacles many people face when seeking therapy (Interview 2). Another participant confirmed the consistency of the barriers across interviews, noting that although the responses varied, the presence of common barriers, such as stigma, underscored their significance (Interview 13). A third respondent praised the research for being comprehensive and capturing a wide range of difficulties encountered when seeking therapy, including therapy protocols, symptoms, and common societal challenges (Interview 9). Lastly, another participant affirmed that the results accurately reflected the factors influencing therapy-seeking decisions, noting the coherence between their own experiences and the study’s conclusions (Interview 22).
The final member check reinforced the credibility and reliability of the qualitative findings. By presenting the participants with the themes and interview excerpts, the researchers allowed respondents to directly assess the alignment between their personal experiences and the study’s outcomes. The feedback indicated that the findings were consistent with the participants’ perceptions, ensuring their voices were faithfully represented in the research. The validation process enhanced study rigor, ensuring trustworthiness and authenticity. Participants confirmed the results accurately reflected their experiences and barriers in seeking psychological help, strengthening the study’s credibility.
4 Discussion
This article explored the perceived barriers faced by university students enrolled at the National Autonomous University of Honduras when seeking professional psychological help. A qualitative study was conducted to capture the perspectives. The findings focused on four key aspects: (1) Motivators for seeking psychological help, (2) Psychotherapy sources, (3) Barriers to seeking help, and (4) Facilitators of seeking psychological help.
This study underscores positive motivators like self-awareness, growth, and emotional balance, alongside adverse motivators such as emotional distress, anxiety, depression, and low self-esteem, as key elements influencing the pursuit of psychological support. The interaction between positive and adverse motivators significantly shapes the decision to seek psychological help, ultimately fostering personal development, emotional relief, and enhanced self-understanding. These findings align with existing research, which highlights the importance of fulfilling basic psychological needs and strengthening self-regulation as central factors in motivating individuals to seek psychological assistance (Gündoğdu et al., 2024; Worthley et al., 2017).
The physical environments where psychological therapy occurs play a pivotal role in addressing the increasing demand for mental health services (Jackson, 2018; Munyaradzi and Addae, 2019). While university campus services are intended to be primary sources of support, they are often overwhelmed by demand and relatively expensive for student programs (Farrer et al., 2019). Public health services face long waiting lists and reliability issues, while private healthcare offers quality services but is financially inaccessible. In Latin America, limited hospital mental health care disproportionately impacts low-income groups (Fernández-Rodríguez et al., 2019; Liu et al., 2019; Yánez, 2022; Williams et al., 2023; Sigal and Plunkett, 2024). Online therapy has emerged as a valuable alternative, providing local accessibility and enhancing trust through the convenience and anonymity of virtual sessions. Online interactions significantly influence positive attitudes toward remote therapy, making this method a practical, convenient, and cost-effective option for individuals unable to attend in-person sessions (Ryan et al., 2010; Day et al., 2013; Horgan et al., 2013; Levin et al., 2018; Lancia et al., 2023; Blair et al., 2024).
Barriers to seeking psychological support are multifaceted, with stigma as a key obstacle. Cultural norms perpetuate misconceptions, such as associating mental health care with being “crazy,” fostering fear of judgment. This stigma diminishes the perceived value of services, discouraging individuals from seeking help and hindering access to care and treatment continuity (Topkaya et al., 2016; Cha et al., 2019; Ebert et al., 2019; Ibrahim et al., 2019; Shea et al., 2019; Cage et al., 2020). Cultural beliefs exacerbate barriers to seeking psychological support, particularly those that normalize physical punishment as a method of behavior regulation or advocate enduring adversity instead of pursuing emotional assistance; these attitudes are closely linked to male chauvinism, which often frames men seeking psychological help as a sign of weakness. Such norms, contribute to greater reluctance among men to seek help (Smith and Hebdon, 2024).
An additional obstacle to seeking psychological help is rooted in the individual’s microenvironment, where prevailing ideas, prejudices, and a lack of psychoeducation can present considerable challenges (Zhang et al., 2024). A microenvironment with a negative perception of psychological support may spread misinformation, leading to confusion and uncertainty about seeking help. This, in turn, can foster feelings of isolation and insecurity, making it even more challenging for individuals to seek help (Landa-Blanco et al., 2024a; Landa-Blanco et al., 2024c).
Individual barriers significantly influence the decision to seek psychological help, as they are deeply rooted in personal beliefs and emotions, making them particularly difficult to overcome (Grøtan et al., 2019; Wang et al., 2020; Lipson et al., 2022). These barriers not only obstruct the pursuit of psychological support but also affect an individual’s commitment to therapy. Key factors include reluctance to disclose personal issues, particularly to a stranger such as a psychologist, fear of being judged during therapy sessions, and skepticism about the effectiveness or necessity of therapy. Moreover, this resistance is frequently linked to a conflict with personal autonomy (Sweetman et al., 2021). In line with previous literature, doubts about the effectiveness of therapy services, stigma, and the fear of judgment underscore the complexity of individual perceptions; these factors reinforce a sense of self-sufficiency that deters individuals from seeking professional help (Dunley and Papadopoulos, 2019).
Logistic barriers are critical factors that significantly impact individuals’ ability to seek psychological help. These barriers complicate access to therapy and disrupt the consistency of attending sessions. This study highlighted several logistical challenges, including financial constraints, geographic limitations, long waiting lists, and the time commitment required for psychological appointments. Such logistical challenges hinder individuals from accessing formal mental health care (Umubyeyi et al., 2016; House et al., 2020).
A lack of trust in the mental health professional represents another significant barrier to seeking psychological help; perceived issues such as unprofessional conduct, challenges in building rapport, and concerns about confidentiality can lead to negative experiences. Distrust in psychologists hinders undergraduate students from pursuing psychological assistance, as it raises doubts about the effectiveness of treatment (Chen, 2012).
This study highlighted two primary factors that facilitate the process of seeking psychological help: social facilitators and a positive perception of professional psychological support. Social influence, such as shared positive experiences within families, among friends, or through online platforms, plays a critical role in normalizing therapy and easing the decision to seek assistance. Consistent with existing literature, social support is a key motivator for individuals to pursue, remain engaged in, and commit to professional psychological services (Bugtong-Diez, 2020; Nakamura et al., 2022).
In conclusion, this study identifies barriers to seeking psychological help, including stigma, internalized beliefs, and social factors, which often lead individuals to rely on self-help or ignore their distress. However, motivators like self-awareness, personal growth, and social influences encourage seeking therapy. Accessing professional support is essential for mental health improvement, especially for students facing academic and social stress.
The study’s limitations include its focus on students and difficulties in contacting those opposed to seeking help. Qualitative research limits generalizability but provides valuable contextual insights. Future research could explore additional social factors, assess the effectiveness of therapeutic interventions, and investigate the role of psychological services, policies, and interdisciplinary teams in supporting students.
Data availability statement
The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article will be made available by the authors, without undue reservation.
Ethics statement
The studies involving humans were approved by the Research Ethics Committee of the Faculty of Social Sciences (UNAH), under registration number CEIFCS-2023-P2. The studies were conducted in accordance with the local legislation and institutional requirements. The participants provided their written informed consent to participate in this study.
Author contributions
ER: Conceptualization, Investigation, Writing – original draft, Formal analysis, Methodology, Supervision. CB-A: Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Writing – original draft. GC: Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Writing – original draft. FO-M: Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Writing – original draft. IC: Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Writing – original draft: RM-S: Conceptualization, Investigation, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. EP-M: Conceptualization, Investigation, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. ML-B: Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing.
Funding
The author(s) declare that no financial support was received for the research and/or publication of this article.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Generative AI statement
The authors declare that no Gen AI was used in the creation of this manuscript.
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Supplementary material
The Supplementary material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1565943/full#supplementary-material
References
Blair, M., Tweedlie, L., Minnis, H., Cronin, I., and Turner, F. (2024). Online therapy with families - what can families tell us about how to do this well? A qualitative study assessing families’ experience of remote dyadic developmental psychotherapy compared to face-to-face therapy. PLoS One 19:e0301640. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0301640
Bugtong-Diez, M. A. (2020). Testing the moderating role of self-reliance and social support on the mediated relationship of help-seeking attitudes and behavior through intentions among individuals with mental health concerns. Int. J. Human. Soc. Sci. 12, 33–51. doi: 10.26803/ijhss.12.2.3
Cage, E., Stock, M., Sharpington, A., Pitman, E., and Batchelor, R. (2020). Barriers to accessing support for mental health issues at university. Stud. High. Educ. 45, 1637–1649. doi: 10.1080/03075079.2018.1544237
Cha, B. S., Enriquez, L. E., and Ro, A. (2019). Beyond access: psychosocial barriers to undocumented students’ use of mental health services. Soc. Sci. Med. 233, 193–200. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2019.06.003
Chen, J. (2012). Seeking help for psychological distress in urban China. J. Community Psychol. 40, 319–341. doi: 10.1002/jcop.20513
Creswell, J. W., and Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications, Inc.
Day, V., McGrath, P. J., and Wojtowicz, M. (2013). Internet-based guided self-help for university students with anxiety, depression and stress: a randomized controlled clinical trial. Behav. Res. Ther. 51, 344–351. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2013.03.003
Dunley, P., and Papadopoulos, A. (2019). Why is it so hard to get help? Barriers to help-seeking in postsecondary students struggling with mental health issues: a scoping review. Int. J. Ment. Health Addict. 17, 699–715. doi: 10.1007/s11469-018-0029-z
Ebert, D. D., Mortier, P., Kaehlke, F., Bruffaerts, R., Baumeister, H., Auerbach, R. P., et al. (2019). Barriers of mental health treatment utilization among first-year college students: first cross-national results from the WHO world mental health international college student initiative. Int. J. Methods Psychiatr. Res. 28:e1782. doi: 10.1002/mpr.1782
Farrer, L. M., Gulliver, A., Katruss, N., Fassnacht, D. B., Kyrios, M., and Batterham, P. J. (2019). A novel multi-component online intervention to improve the mental health of university students: randomised controlled trial of the Uni virtual clinic. Internet Interv. 18:100276. doi: 10.1016/j.invent.2019.100276
Fernández-Rodríguez, C., Soto-López, T., and Cuesta, M. (2019). Needs and demands for psychological care in university students. Psicothema 4, 414–421. doi: 10.7334/psicothema2019.78
Grøtan, K., Sund, E. R., and Bjerkeset, O. (2019). Mental health, academic self-efficacy and study Progress among college students – the SHoT study, Norway. Front. Psychol. 10:45. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00045
Gündoğdu, H., Aslan, K., Ayhan, H. C., and Aktaş, C. M. (2024). Variables predicting psychological help seeking attitudes: self-stigma, mental health literacy, and depression/anxiety. Eur. Psychiatry 67:S678. doi: 10.1192/j.eurpsy.2024.1409
Horgan, A., McCarthy, G., and Sweeney, J. (2013). An evaluation of an online peer support forum for university students with depressive symptoms. Arch. Psychiatr. Nurs. 27, 84–89. doi: 10.1016/j.apnu.2012.12.005
House, L. A., Neal, C., and Kolb, J. (2020). Supporting the mental health needs of first generation college students. J. Coll. Stud. Psychother. 34, 157–167. doi: 10.1080/87568225.2019.1578940
Ibrahim, N., Amit, N., Shahar, S., Wee, L. H., Ismail, R., Khairuddin, R., et al. (2019). Do depression literacy, mental illness beliefs and stigma influence mental health help-seeking attitude? A cross-sectional study of secondary school and university students from B40 households in Malaysia. BMC Public Health 19:544. doi: 10.1186/s12889-019-6862-6
Jackson, D. (2018). Aesthetics and the psychotherapist’s office. J. Clin. Psychol. 74, 233–238. doi: 10.1002/jclp.22576
Lancia, I. S., Festa, G. M., Attouchi, A., and Civino, M. (2023). Tele-psychotherapy of anxiety and depression disorders. Eur. Psychiatry 66:S684. doi: 10.1192/j.eurpsy.2023.1431
Landa-Blanco, M., García, Y. R., Landa-Blanco, A. L., Cortés-Ramos, A., and Paz-Maldonado, E. (2024a). Social media addiction relationship with academic engagement in university students: the mediator role of self-esteem, depression, and anxiety. Heliyon 10:e24384. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e24384
Landa-Blanco, M., Landa-Blanco, A., Mejía-Suazo, C. J., and Martínez-Martínez, C. A. (2021). Coronavirus awareness and mental health: clinical symptoms and attitudes toward seeking professional psychological help. Front. Psychol. 12:549644. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.549644
Landa-Blanco, M., and Mejía Sánchez, R. (2025). Breaking the cycle: addressing barriers to help-seeking and mental health impacts for male victims of intimate partner violence in low-and middle-income countries. Front. Public Health 13:1565284. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1565284
Landa-Blanco, M., Romero, K., Caballero, I., Gálvez-Pineda, E., Fúnes-Henríquez, M. J., and Romero, R. (2024b). Exploring suicide ideation in university students: sleep quality, social media, self-esteem, and barriers to seeking psychological help. Front. Psych. 15:1352889. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1352889
Landa-Blanco, M., Vásquez, G., Portillo, G., Sproviero, F., and Echenique, Y. (2024c). The impact of adverse childhood experiences on mental health, sexual risk behaviors, and alcohol consumption in adulthood. Front. Psych. 15:1352824. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1352824
Levin, M. E., Stocke, K., Pierce, B., and Levin, C. (2018). Do college students use online self-help? A survey of intentions and use of mental health resources. J. Coll. Stud. Psychother. 32, 181–198. doi: 10.1080/87568225.2017.1366283
Lipson, S. K., Zhou, S., Abelson, S., Heinze, J., Jirsa, M., Morigney, J., et al. (2022). Trends in college student mental health and help-seeking by race/ethnicity: findings from the national healthy minds study, 2013–2021. J. Affect. Disord. 306, 138–147. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2022.03.038
Liu, C. H., Stevens, C., Wong, S. H. M., Yasui, M., and Chen, J. A. (2019). The prevalence and predictors of mental health diagnoses and suicide among U.S. college students: implications for addressing disparities in service use. Depress. Anxiety 36, 8–17. doi: 10.1002/da.22830
Malterud, K., Siersma, V. D., and Guassora, A. D. (2016). Sample size in qualitative interview studies. Qual. Health Res. 26, 1753–1760. doi: 10.1177/1049732315617444
Munyaradzi, M., and Addae, D. (2019). Effectiveness of student psychological support services at a technical and vocational education and training college in South Africa. Commun. Coll. J. Res. Pract. 43, 262–274. doi: 10.1080/10668926.2018.1456379
Nakamura, K., Batterham, P. J., and Reynolds, J. (2022). Professional help-seeking for suicide in Japan: modifiable factors influencing help-seeking beliefs, attitudes, and intentions. J. Affect. Disord. Rep. 10:100425. doi: 10.1016/j.jadr.2022.100425
Ryan, M. L., Shochet, I. M., and Stallman, H. M. (2010). Universal online interventions might engage psychologically distressed university students who are unlikely to seek formal help. Adv. Ment. Health 9, 73–83. doi: 10.5172/jamh.9.1.73
Shea, M., Wong, Y. J., Nguyen, K. K., and Gonzalez, P. D. (2019). College students’ barriers to seeking mental health counseling: scale development and psychometric evaluation. J. Couns. Psychol. 66, 626–639. doi: 10.1037/cou0000356
Shi, J., Tang, L., Jing, L., Geng, J., Liu, R., Luo, L., et al. (2019). Disparities in mental health care utilization among inpatients in various types of health institutions: a cross-sectional study based on EHR data in Shanghai, China. BMC Public Health 19:1023. doi: 10.1186/s12889-019-7343-7
Sigal, M., and Plunkett, S. W. (2024). Gender and ethnic differences in university students’ attitudes about mental health services. J. College Student Mental Health 38, 275–292. doi: 10.1080/87568225.2023.2179286
Smith, G. D., and Hebdon, M. (2024). Mental health help-seeking behaviour in men. J. Adv. Nurs. 80, 851–853. doi: 10.1111/jan.15869
Sweetman, J., Knapp, P., Varley, D., Woodhouse, R., McMillan, D., and Coventry, P. (2021). Barriers to attending initial psychological therapy service appointments for common mental health problems: a mixed-methods systematic review. J. Affect. Disord. 284, 44–63. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2021.01.089
Topkaya, N., Şahin, E., and Meydan, B. (2016). The development, validity, and reliability of the barriers to seeking psychological help scale for college students. Int. J. High. Educ. 6:48. doi: 10.5430/ijhe.v6n1p48
Umubyeyi, A., Mogren, I., Ntaganira, J., and Krantz, G. (2016). Help-seeking behaviours, barriers to care and self-efficacy for seeking mental health care: a population-based study in Rwanda. Soc. Psychiatry Psychiatr. Epidemiol. 51, 81–92. doi: 10.1007/s00127-015-1130-2
Wang, Z.-H., Yang, H. L., Yang, Y. Q., Liu, D., Li, Z. H., Zhang, X. R., et al. (2020). Prevalence of anxiety and depression symptom, and the demands for psychological knowledge and interventions in college students during COVID-19 epidemic: a large cross-sectional study. J. Affect. Disord. 275, 188–193. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2020.06.034
Williams, K. D. A., Adkins, A., Kuo, S. I., LaRose, J. G., Utsey, S. O., Guidry, J. P. D., et al. (2023). Mental health disorder symptom prevalence and rates of help-seeking among university-enrolled, emerging adults. J. Am. Coll. Heal. 71, 61–68. doi: 10.1080/07448481.2021.1873791
Worthley, J. P., Hostetler, A. J., and Frye, A. A. (2017). Motivated to seek help: masculine norms and self-regulated motivation in self-help groups. Psychol. Men Masculin. 18, 20–31. doi: 10.1037/men0000040
Yánez, É. (2022). Why is mental health care necessary during hospitalization? Int. J. Public Health 67:1605153. doi: 10.3389/ijph.2022.1605153
Keywords: mental health, university students, barriers to psychological help, psychological support, psychotherapy, help seeking
Citation: Rivera E, Barahona-Aguilar C, Cuevas G, Orellana-Moreno F, Corrales I, Mejía-Sánchez R, Paz-Maldonado E and Landa-Blanco M (2025) Seeking support or avoiding it? A qualitative study of professional psychological help perceptions among university students in Honduras. Front. Psychol. 16:1565943. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1565943
Edited by:
Raúl Sampieri-Cabrera, National Autonomous University of Mexico, MexicoReviewed by:
Samuel Gutierrez-Barreto, National Autonomous University of Mexico, MexicoJosé Ricardo Ku Ruiz, National Autonomous University of Mexico, Mexico
Copyright © 2025 Rivera, Barahona-Aguilar, Cuevas, Orellana-Moreno, Corrales, Mejía-Sánchez, Paz-Maldonado and Landa-Blanco. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Miguel Landa-Blanco, bWlndWVsLmxhbmRhQHVuYWguZWR1Lmhu