Jennifer Apolinário-Hagen1,2*†
Johannes Schobel3
Anne-Kathrin Helten4
Fatma Sahan1,2
Rüdiger Pryss5
Dennis John4†- 1Institute for Occupational, Social and Environmental Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf and University Hospital Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
- 2Center for Digital Medicine, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
- 3DigiHealth Institute, Neu-Ulm University of Applied Sciences, Neu-Ulm, Germany
- 4Institute for Applied Research and Evaluation, Lutheran University of Applied Sciences, Nuremberg, Germany
- 5Institute of Clinical Epidemiology and Biometry, University of Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
Recent research indicates that more than one-third of university students globally experience substantial stress, mild anxiety symptoms, and mild or moderate–severe depressive symptoms, respectively. Despite the clear need, existing well-established mental health services (MHS) at universities, ranging from on-site health promotion programs to mobile health apps, are rarely used by students. Barriers for uptake include on the one hand person-specific factors, such as lack of problem awareness or knowledge about available services, and on the other hand challenges related to support structures like complex registration processes, limited resources or insufficient implementation of MHS. Low-threshold, personalized approaches could improve the accessibility, acceptance, and use of existing MHS. Recognizing this mismatch between student demand and service uptake, we propose a customizable recommender system for digital and traditional MHS provided or endorsed by universities. This Perspective article proposes the concept of “ConnectedHealth@University,” a planned platform solution designed to strengthen student mental health across academic settings, and to enhance the connection, reach, and effectiveness of available university services. The proposed platform will offer stress screening, personalized recommendations, and feedback mechanisms to optimize MHS. The overarching goal is to reduce access barriers by raising awareness for study-related stressors and better aligning services with student needs. The recommender system will guide students through a range of MHS at their universities, and provide tailored recommendations based on preferences, and stress profiles. Consequently, we suggest prioritizing recommender system development and the improvement of existing interventions over creating more that may remain underutilized.
1 Introduction
1.1 Promoting mental health among students
Young adulthood is characterized by a multitude of fundamental transitions: from school to university, and then to employment. Mastering these transitions has been identified for many decades as a central developmental task of early adulthood (Arnett, 2000; Havighurst, 1972). The changes that university studies entail require significant adjustment and the development of coping strategies for the associated psychosocial stressors (Skinner et al., 2003). Time pressure due to deadlines and worries concerning exams are well-known risk factors for mental disorders among students, particularly depression and anxiety disorders, which are often associated with reduced motivation and academic performance (Duffy et al., 2020).
Recent studies report increasing stress and mental health issues among students (Heumann et al., 2024; Li et al., 2022; Tsiouris et al., 2023; Vidović et al., 2024). In an umbrella review of 62 meta-analysis with more than 8.7 million participants, Paiva et al. (2025) found relatively high prevalence rates for symptoms of mental disorders among university students, especially for depressive symptoms (mild: 35.41%, moderate: 24.54%, severe: 13.42%), anxiety (mild: 40.21%, moderate: 28.18%, severe: 16.78%), sleep disorders (mild: 41.09%, moderate: 23.3%, severe: 13.02%), and increased stress prevalence of 36.34%. In a survey of 24,533 students at 13 German universities, approximately 40–50% reported (almost) always or frequently feeling exhausted during their daily studies or experiencing burnout symptoms during the COVID-19 pandemic (Heinrichs et al., 2024). The changes in study conditions in many degree programs brought about by the COVID-19 pandemic (e.g., decrease in social contacts) may also be associated with increased rates of depressive symptoms especially in countries with higher income (Paiva et al., 2025), and could have a lasting impact on the mental health and qualifications of the next generation of academics, who are so urgently needed to build crisis-resilient societal structures.
However, according to international research, students with mental health needs show poor help-seeking activities, especially male students (Pei et al., 2024). At the same time, female undergraduate students have a higher likelihood of experiencing mental health issues (Kartikasari et al., 2025). These findings indicate that existing mental health services (MHS) fail to reach students comprehensively; instead, there is a demand for tailored interventions that are actually used, especially before the manifestation of symptoms requiring treatment.
1.2 Fragmented mental health services at universities
Universities are central to student health promotion, encompassing both setting-based and behavioral prevention. The World Health Organization (WHO) has recognized the mismatch of mental health issues and actual uptake of MHS among university students several years ago (Cuijpers et al., 2019). Numerous universities have also acknowledged the urgent need to support students’ developmental tasks and have launched (more or less mandatory) nation-wide initiatives to promote students’ mental health around the world, e.g., in China (Yu et al., 2025), India (Jaisoorya et al., 2023) or Canada (Read et al., 2023). In contrast to voluntary programs and frameworks for promoting students’ mental health in countries like the United States (Rolin and Appelbaum, 2025) or Australia (Hutchesson et al., 2025; Luu, 2025), German policy makers have legally anchored this duty in the Prevention Act (§20 Social Code Book V), enshrining the funding of health-promoting programs on the expense of statutory health insurance companies for the vast majority of citizens, including university students (Hungerland et al., 2022). Universities typically offer or suggest varied psychological services, ranging from counseling centers to referrals to psychotherapeutic outpatient clinics with individual consultations. For instance, psychological counseling, available on-site and online, is a common and beneficial service (Cerolini et al., 2023; Pizzo et al., 2024), yet varies significantly by country, location, legal status, and institutional size (Franzoi et al., 2022). Although high-income countries typically offer a wide range of on-campus MHS, these resources are often underutilized, disjointed, or poorly coordinated, highlighting a key international challenge (Osborn et al., 2022).
1.3 Accessing suitable mental health services
Despite the high prevalence of mental illness among students (Heumann et al., 2024; Paiva et al., 2025), university MHS are underutilized, especially among vulnerable student groups (Hyseni Duraku et al., 2024). A systematic review (Zhao et al., 2025) found that only 28% of students with mental health issues actively sought help, though 41% intended to.
Barriers to seeking help are both individual and institutional. At the individual level, key obstacles include self-reliance, lack of time, limited awareness of resources, under-recognition of early symptoms, and the belief that they do not need formal support (Zhao et al., 2025; Ebert et al., 2019; Krümmel et al., 2023; MacDonald et al., 2022). At the institutional level, fragmented responsibilities, regulatory obstacles and limited resources further hinder comprehensive psychosocial support (Hyseni Duraku et al., 2024; Priestley et al., 2022; Roy et al., 2025).
To extend on-campus MSH, such as stress management, mindfulness and relaxation courses, flexible low-threshold digital MHS have also been increasingly developed, showing efficacy in reducing stress and depressive symptoms among university students (Harrer et al., 2018; Harrer et al., 2021; Matos Fialho et al., 2025). The initial barrier, though, is students recognizing their need for support and the drivers for utilization for long-term preventative effects (Krümmel et al., 2023). Subsequently, they must actively register for these MHS, a process particularly challenging for first-year and international students unfamiliar with the diverse range of university support providers (Schweighart et al., 2024).
Additionally, despite the initial optimism surrounding pilot programs, the sustainable integration of digital MHS into university structures remains limited (D’Adamo et al., 2023), and students lack information regarding trustworthy digital MHS (Montagni et al., 2020; Vomhof et al., 2024). Furthermore, universities often lack financial and personnel resources for the permanent implementation of quality-approved digital MHS, and costs for implementation as well as maintenance of digital MHS for university students are seldom reported (Taylor et al., 2024). Integrating mental health promotion and education on self-help digital MHS into curricula (e.g., Car et al., 2025; Sahan et al., 2024; Till et al., 2024) is promising, but oftentimes restricted to specific subjects (e.g., medicine). Further established and implementable solutions exist to improve service awareness and uptake, such as offering app-based recommender systems, including stress screening and feedback tools, such as “TrackYourStress” (Pryss et al., 2019), which provide individualized service recommendations and facilitate registration and initial engagement.
2 Health recommender systems as a promising strategy
Health recommender systems (HRS) help users find relevant services and information by reducing choice overload and make better choices aligning with personal needs and preferences, which could improve motivation, engagement with MHS and support behavior change (De Croon et al., 2021; Valentine et al., 2023). Research on HRS shows promise in increasing the uptake and engagement with digital MHS, such as apps for anxiety and depression (Cheung et al., 2018).
Ethical challenges involve lack of explainability, privacy-personalization trade-offs, and control over app usage data (Valentine et al., 2023). Useful mental HRS require clear standards, secure data handling, and ongoing refinement based on user feedback (Tapuria et al., 2024). Machine Learning (ML), including rule-based mechanisms for assessment and content tailoring, is commonly used to personalize MHS for young people, with Large Language Models and generative Artificial Intelligence gaining recent attention (Wanniarachchi et al., 2025). Despite their promises, HRS still face challenges such as bias and overfitting (Slade et al., 2024). Bias can occur at different stages (e.g., conception, data collection) and from several sources, including human (e.g., confirmation bias), data (e.g., sampling, selection, participation bias), and algorithms (Hasanzadeh et al., 2025). Hence, during the development and implementation of HRS, both representative samples as well as insights from formative qualitative research are crucial to address diverse sources of bias (John et al., 2016). This includes needs assessment as well as inquiries on information preferences of students regarding (digital) MHS (Vomhof et al., 2024; Braun et al., 2023). Key organizational stakeholders should also be involved in each stage, especially student counseling centers as oftentimes first and main referral source (D’Adamo et al., 2023).
Various approaches for tailoring and providing recommendations already exist. A scoping review by Cheung et al. (2019) demonstrated a broad heterogeneity in applied HRS approaches, including content-based, collaborative, and hybrid filtering (combining methods), with recommendations often delivered via in-app messages. Combining collaborative methods with demographic and knowledge-based filtering can enhance user experience in demand-tailored digital, on-site and blended health programs. Such hybrid HRS show promise in advancing personalized digital health solutions (Cheung et al., 2019).
Cai et al. (2022) reviewed 63 studies across 24 health domains and found that knowledge-based algorithms were most common but noted limited research and called for more dynamic user modeling, open-source knowledge bases, and large-scale evaluations.
These selected findings on the HRS research landscape provide guidance and valuable insights into the general strategies as well as the chances and risks of such platforms, which can be well applied to the development of a data-driven mental HRS for university students.
In this Perspective article, we thus present a concept for such a planned HRS. Given the early stage of development, the following illustration is not grounded on empirical data.
3 Illustrating objectives and features of a digital screening and recommender platform
As a promising example of a low-barrier digital platform with screening tools and an integrated recommender system, we present our ongoing vision for “ConnectedHealth@University.” In this context, we consulted key stakeholders from different organizations (e.g., psychological counseling centers, student representatives, student unions, health insurance companies) to assess key features and important requirements. These requirements will be refined in the next steps of this project and further elaborated in workshops with selected participants fostering co-creation approaches.
This concept for a digital platform intends to address the prevention paradox of high student demand for mental health support alongside the underutilization of existing university health promotion services. To achieve this, “ConnectedHealth@University” involves the following goals:
• Goal 1 : Raising awareness by offering low-threshold onboarding and everyday screening options for students in the form of self-tests (e.g., perceived stress related to exams or time pressure). This may help increase awareness of students’ own stress and strain profiles, especially when combined with psychoeducation and fact sheets on mental health promotion.
• Goal 2: Matching services with students’ needs by providing demand-tailored suggestions via a recommender system. Personalized recommendations will take existing digital, on-site, and blended MHS at the university, as well as associated external digital MHS, into account based on students’ individual stress profiles and stated preferences. The recommender system is intended to identify and integrate existing MHS and related data, aiming for a seamless interface and low thresholds for registration and service utilization (e.g., through an integrated search form).
• Goal 3: Understanding and improving services and their uptake by establishing a feedback and monitoring system to assess satisfaction and acceptance (e.g., perceived usefulness and relevance of recommendations), as well as the intended and actual use of MHS at the respective university.
4 Scientific and technical objectives of the digital platform
The platform will be designed to help students better understand their stress triggers and psychosocial resources in their academic setting, while also facilitating access to existing MHS at participating universities. The overall goal of the platform’s concept is to offer easily accessible referrals and connections between university support services to mitigate the negative impacts of mental health issues on students and to enhance their academic functioning.
4.1 Technical requirements
From a technical perspective, the platform will fully leverage state-of-the-art technologies to maximize user acceptance, while providing transparency by adhering to reporting guidelines for HRS (De Croon et al., 2021). Beyond the already mentioned participatory development approach, we identify the following technical features as essential, as shown in Table 1.
Table 1. Technical features of the proposed “ConnectedHealth@University” platform.
To support these capabilities, modern cross-platform architecture will be implemented, consisting of a web application (fully responsive for mobile devices) and native mobile apps for Android and iOS that can be distributed via official stores. The architecture of the sensor framework is detailed elsewhere (Karthan et al., 2022). Ideally, the apps should also connect with relevant external stakeholders (e.g., health insurers, counseling centers) to ensure real-time access to updated content.
In order to ensure a high privacy and security standard, we intend to clearly separate Identity Data (IDAT) from Medical Data (MDAT), which is a common approach in medical informatics (Lablans et al., 2015; Spitzer et al., 2009). Login information, including the e-mail address containing students’ names and profile data, will be stored within the IDAT database, while all collected information and recommendations are stored in a separate MDAT database. Depending on the system, there may be two different databases (i.e., like two different relational databases), two different files (i.e., like two different SQLite databases), or one large database with two different schemas (i.e., PostgreSQL). Most importantly, this approach guarantees that no identifying information is stored within the MDAT database. Additionally, both databases should be encrypted by default (with different keys).
To enhance students’ acceptance, a mixed-methods, co-creation approach will be applied. In a first step, interviews with experts from respective domains are conducted to assess basic requirements of the platform (e.g., instruments, features of the recommender system, etc.). Next, a comprehensive user-interface will be developed and evaluated with target end users to meet their demands. Feedback will be collected via an online survey and incorporated in the apps via rapid-development cycles (e.g., using the System Usability Scale; Bangor et al., 2008; Hyzy et al., 2022).
Initially, the recommender system balancing personalization and privacy will mainly process user-entered data on needs (e.g., Ecological Momentary Assessment; EMA) and stated preferences for hybrid filtering of suitable MHS (using content- and knowledge-based, see Table 2). The acceptance of collaborative filtering and more sensitive data collection required for context-aware filtering will be investigated using participatory research approaches prior to possible implementation.
Table 2. Stepwise application of filtering approaches for personalizing recommendations to students.
Before using the app, students will provide informed consent, clearly understanding how and why their data is used and making an informed decision about the personalization-privacy trade-off. Our recommender system will initially use a hybrid approach (content- and knowledge-based filtering), which is safe and explainable, matching students’ EMA responses and stated preferences with relevant MHS. While this can become repetitive, context-aware filtering can provide just-in-time suggestions if students agree to share more sensitive data (e.g., sensor data). We recognize that collaborative filtering offers novel, peer-endorsed suggestions but requires a large dataset and risks exacerbating bias (Stinson, 2022). Finally, we propose federated learning (FL) for privacy-preserving model training directly on user devices. FL will improve cross-institutional generalizability, enhance trust in personalized MHS suggestions across multiple universities (using the same EMA instruments), and enable larger-scale performance, potentially in an international context. Nonetheless, FL approaches are still at an early stage (Grataloup and Kurpicz-Briki, 2024).
We plan to evaluate the system through a controlled field study (e.g., A/B trial) to assess its effectiveness regarding changes in students’ mental health outcomes based on the specific MHS it recommends. In addition, we will employ a mixed-methods adoption assessment, combining usage analytics with online surveys and qualitative interviews to understand user acceptance, perceived usefulness, and factors influencing sustained engagement as well as practical applicability (see Table 1). A concrete study design must be discussed with stakeholders from different domains in order to gain broader insights.
4.2 Content components and modules of the platform
From a content perspective, the platform concept includes the following modules (see Figure 1).
Figure 1. Content components of the platform “ConnectedHealth@University” in response to common barriers to use of mental health services among university students. This figure illustrates the goals and main features of a unified university platform for student mental health promotion, outlining common barriers and how recommender systems can mitigate them based on the modular structure of the proposed platform “ConnectedHealth@University” (self-created illustration).
Module 1: “I can learn more about myself and my health.”
The screening tool is based on EMA (Shiffman et al., 2008) that can be augmented with a mobile crowdsensing solution (Pryss et al., 2018). Data gathered through crowdsensing can be used to identify university-specific stress scenarios in larger student groups, such as exam situations and the possibility to provide feedback to students (Pryss et al., 2019; Pryss et al., 2019). Students have access to various screening tools (e.g., subjective stress levels, dealing with test anxiety, or time management problems) and receive individualized feedback on their mental health status. Through continuous use of such a digital platform via a mobile app in everyday life, students are provided with on-time feedback on their stress levels and stress-inducing situations in their study routines. The screening can be complemented with psychoeducation and brief exercises. Such immediate support is important, as students experiencing acute stress (e.g., due to exams) may prioritize targeted short-term relief on long-term preventive measures (Krümmel et al., 2023).
Module 2: “I can use suitable health services at my university.”
Based on the results of the screening tool (see Module 1), an individualized recommendation of support services can be made at the respective local university as a trustworthy information source (Vomhof et al., 2024; Braun et al., 2023). This module acts as a kind of guide, selecting relevant MHS from a stored database and presenting demand-tailored suggestions to the students (e.g., sorted by suitability or personal relevance). The platform may contain a uniform registration form for the federated authentication for respective events or services, so that students can register directly. This eliminates several access barriers, such as different registration forms or information channels. Module 2 aims to facilitate access to existing MHS through comprehensive information and low-threshold registration options (Apolinário-Hagen et al., 2023).
Module 3: “I can participate in a digital health service.”
To increase the reach of health promotion, many universities already provide their students free access to a range of digital mental health resources, such as “TrackYourStress” (Pryss et al., 2019; O’Rourke et al., 2022). Some MHS have been developed in-house by universities. Others are offered free of charge to students in cooperation with partners, such as health insurance companies. Besides on-site interventions, many students are unaware of available digital MHS (Schweighart et al., 2024; Apolinário-Hagen et al., 2021). Likewise, the overly wide range of registration options for digital MHS represents a key barrier to access and uptake among students (Dederichs et al., 2021) as well as perceived lack of personalization in digital MHS (Riboldi et al., 2024). The goal of the “ConnectedHealth@University” platform is to provide personalized guidance on digital MHS, such as “StudiCare Stress” (Harrer et al., 2021). This includes direct download and registration options for digital MHS to enable low-threshold access (see Supplementary Figure S1).
Module 4: “I can evaluate the health services offered by my university.”
Although methods for measuring user satisfaction and acceptance of MHS are well-described, systematic collection of feedback data is rarely used at universities, especially by student counseling centers that often have limited personal resources as well as no access to suitable digital documentation systems (Farahani et al., 2023). In addition, there is scarce systematic research on the actual utilization rates of these MHS for students, with globally largely varying rates (Osborn et al., 2022).
The platform “ConnectedHealth@University” incorporates a module to establish consistent and continuous feedback data on MHS and a satisfaction monitoring system for existing MHS. To achieve this, the platform regularly sends notifications, asking students to rate respective programs. The feedback results may be shared with relevant stakeholders at each university and through networks. These reports are anonymized and provided in compliance with data protection regulations such as GDPR for European settings, using a user-friendly dashboard solution.
5 Discussion
Research consistently shows a significant gap between university students’ mental health needs and their help-seeking behavior, influenced by personal factors such as low problem awareness and systemic barriers across many universities globally (Zhao et al., 2025). Especially student-based barriers seeking mental health support such as the preference for self-reliance could be addressed by tailored digital solutions (Ebert et al., 2019).
Hence, more efficient mental health promotion strategies are needed for university students, ideally starting in freshmen week before study-related stressors emerge (Dederichs et al., 2021). In Canada, Velmovitsky et al. (2025) trained ML models using survey data from undergraduate students to predict risks of common mental health issues, which aims to form the basis for a system offering personalized recommendations for MHS.
While recommender systems represent a promising avenue to support student mental health, further empirical research is needed to evaluate their effectiveness. At the same time, successful implementation requires the involvement of key stakeholders, particularly in developing and applying guidelines for selected mental health apps (Khan et al., 2023). Moreover, providing students with clear information and direct registration options has been shown to be vital for increasing the uptake of digital MHS (Harrer et al., 2021; Apolinário-Hagen et al., 2023).
Considering the outlined substantial gaps, the “ConnectedHealth@University” concept centers on the stakeholder-driven development and implementation of digital platforms that integrate HRS to precisely match students’ needs with suitable existing university support services. Digital screening and feedback functions enable tailored recommendations based on individual preferences for format (digital, in-person, blended) and intervention framework (e.g., duration, individual versus group setting). Student feedback on service acceptance and satisfaction will help optimize and expand present health promotion measures.
5.1 Implementation challenges and strategies
Ethical challenges, including fairness and equity, must be considered throughout the development of recommender systems, especially in FL (Grataloup and Kurpicz-Briki, 2024). Self-selection bias is a common challenge, as current digital MHS research predominantly relies on female and White participants (Taylor et al., 2024). Students who participate are often those already informed about support, and thus may not represent the primary target group. To avoid this, recruitment strategies for co-creation must be adapted (Hasanzadeh et al., 2025). We will gather historical data from diverse student subgroups using the established “TrackYourStress” app (Pryss et al., 2019; O’Rourke et al., 2022) that applies validated EMA measures. This will be complemented by larger representative survey data for the platform’s “cold start,” as recommended (Hasanzadeh et al., 2025; Stinson, 2022). Our project will start with at least four different universities across Germany.
Personalization based on sociodemographic characteristics such as ethnicity will be avoided to prevent oversimplification and prejudice perpetuation (Taylor et al., 2024). Instead, personalization will use assessed needs (via EMA) and stated preferences. The acceptance of further features (context-aware filtering, preferred authentication) will be explored in formative qualitative research (e.g., focus group discussions). Since EMA and other health data are sensitive under GDPR (Ienca and Malgieri, 2022; Zhang et al., 2025), we will prioritize transparency and user control. Students will be fully informed about data use with a clear opt-out option. Because the platform targets health promotion and early intervention, not acute crises, a minimal safety protocol will be implemented, automatically triggered by elevated stress scores to provide immediate, generic, expert/rule-based information on regular support services. The platform will neither include questions about suicidal ideation or clinical screening, nor provide direct access to healthcare. Students will be informed that the system is not a substitute for therapist contact or suitable for severe issues.
Sustainable platform implementation requires context-sensitive, early involvement of key stakeholders (Cross et al., 2025), such as on-campus psychological counseling centers as gatekeepers, and practical guidance for university staff on updating MHS in the platform. Staff buy-in is thus crucial, necessitating measures like participatory approaches to increase commitment, like communicating benefits (e.g., reduced workload for general advice), and providing training and support. In addition, the platform must be integrated into existing IT infrastructure, including digital support systems of counseling centers. Ongoing maintenance should be ensured through the platform’s design (reliable, safe personalized recommendations via FL; shift to passive data collection/tracking; reduced effort for students and staff) and long-term implementation strategies, including funding, workflow integration and training (Berardi et al., 2024; Löchner et al., 2025; Nair et al., 2024). Both institution-wide and cross-university governance must be considered.
German universities benefit from the Prevention Act (Hungerland et al., 2022) for establishing cross-institutional MHS recommender systems. A realistic approach involves using competitive funding schemes for initial piloting and validation, while engaging health insurance representatives early to secure future implementation.
6 Conclusion
By sharing the concept of the “ConnectedHealth@University” platform, we aim to present a blueprint for a platform that can help overcome multiple barriers preventing university students from using existing MHS throughout their academic journey.
Specifically, by revealing underexplored patterns of actual use, we expect the platform to support a more effective alignment of MHS with students’ needs.
We, an interdisciplinary team of researchers specializing in the user-centered implementation of (digital) health services, call for a shift in priorities: We encourage researchers, funders, and stakeholders at universities to comprehensively employ the potential of HRS for low-threshold, tailored student mental health promotion. This approach involves shifting focus toward connecting and refining existing interventions before primarily investing further efforts and resources in (generic) novel ones that often fail to overcome common individual and structural barriers to sustainable real-world implementation.
Data availability statement
The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/Supplementary material, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.
Author contributions
JA-H: Conceptualization, Methodology, Supervision, Visualization, Writing – original draft. JS: Conceptualization, Methodology, Software, Supervision, Visualization, Writing – review & editing. A-KH: Conceptualization, Methodology, Writing – review & editing. FS: Conceptualization, Visualization, Writing – review & editing. RP: Conceptualization, Methodology, Software, Supervision, Visualization, Writing – review & editing. DJ: Conceptualization, Methodology, Project administration, Supervision, Writing – original draft.
Funding
The author(s) declared that financial support was received for this work and/or its publication. The University Library Düsseldorf of the Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf covered the open access fee (open access funds).
Acknowledgments
The authors thank the University Library Düsseldorf of the Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf for covering the open access fee (open access funds).
Conflict of interest
The author(s) declared that this work was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
The authors RP, JA-H and JS declared that they were an editorial board member of Frontiers, at the time of submission. This had no impact on the peer review process and the final decision.
Generative AI statement
The authors RP, JA-H and JS declared that Generative AI was used in the creation of this manuscript. The free version of Gemini 2.0 Flash was used to formally check and iteratively edit some parts of the manuscript in terms of language proofreading. Gemini was not used to create content.
Any alternative text (alt text) provided alongside figures in this article has been generated by Frontiers with the support of artificial intelligence and reasonable efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, including review by the authors wherever possible. If you identify any issues, please contact us.
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Supplementary material
The Supplementary material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1629265/full#supplementary-material
References
Apolinário-Hagen, J., Fritsche, L., Wopperer, J., Wals, F., Harrer, M., Lehr, D., et al. (2021). Investigating the persuasive effects of testimonials on the acceptance of digital stress management trainings among university students and underlying mechanisms: a randomized controlled trial. Front. Psychol. 12:738950. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.738950,
Apolinário-Hagen, J., Harrer, M., Salewski, C., Lehr, D., and Ebert, D. D. (2023). Akzeptanz und Nutzung von E-Mental-Health-Angeboten unter Studierenden: Sekundäranalyse eines Experiments. Präv Gesundheitsf. 18, 196–203. doi: 10.1007/s11553-022-00945-1,
Arnett, J. J. (2000). Emerging adulthood: a theory of development from the late teens through the twenties. Am. Psychol. 55, 469–480. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.55.5.469,
Bangor, A., Kortum, P. T., and Miller, J. T. (2008). An empirical evaluation of the system usability scale. Int. J. Hum.-Comput. Interact. 24, 574–594. doi: 10.1080/10447310802205776
Berardi, C., Antonini, M., Jordan, Z., Wechtler, H., Paolucci, F., and Hinwood, M. (2024). Barriers and facilitators to the implementation of digital technologies in mental health systems: a qualitative systematic review to inform a policy framework. BMC Health Serv. Res. 24:243. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-10536-1,
Braun, P., Schwientek, A. K., Angerer, P., Guthardt, L., Icks, A., Loerbroks, A., et al. (2023). Investigating information needs and preferences regarding digital mental health services among medical and psychology students in Germany: a qualitative study. DIGITAL HEALTH. 9:20552076231173568. doi: 10.1177/20552076231173568,
Cai, Y., Yu, F., Kumar, M., Gladney, R., and Mostafa, J. (2022). Health recommender systems development, usage, and evaluation from 2010 to 2022: a scoping review. IJERPH. 19:15115. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192215115,
Car, J., Ong, Q. C., Erlikh Fox, T., Leightley, D., Kemp, S. J., Švab, I., et al. (2025). The digital health competencies in medical education framework: an international consensus statement based on a Delphi study. JAMA Netw. Open 8:e2453131. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.53131,
Cerolini, S., Zagaria, A., Franchini, C., Maniaci, V. G., Fortunato, A., Petrocchi, C., et al. (2023). Psychological counseling among university students worldwide: a systematic review. EJIHPE. 13, 1831–1849. doi: 10.3390/ejihpe13090133,
Cheng, C., and Ebrahimi, O. V. (2023). Gamification: a novel approach to mental health promotion. Curr. Psychiatry Rep. 25, 577–586. doi: 10.1007/s11920-023-01453-5,
Cheung, K. L., Durusu, D., Sui, X., and De Vries, H. (2019). How recommender systems could support and enhance computer-tailored digital health programs: a scoping review. Digital Health. 5:2055207618824727. doi: 10.1177/2055207618824727,
Cheung, K., Ling, W., Karr, C. J., Weingardt, K., Schueller, S. M., and Mohr, D. C. (2018). Evaluation of a recommender app for apps for the treatment of depression and anxiety: an analysis of longitudinal user engagement. J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc. 25, 955–962. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocy023,
Cross, S., Mangelsdorf, S., Valentine, L., O’Sullivan, S., McEnery, C., Scott, I., et al. (2025). Insights from fifteen years of real-world development, testing and implementation of youth digital mental health interventions. Internet Interv. 41:100849. doi: 10.1016/j.invent.2025.100849
Cuijpers, P., Auerbach, R. P., Benjet, C., Bruffaerts, R., Ebert, D., Karyotaki, E., et al. (2019). The World Health Organization world mental health international college student initiative: an overview. Int. J. Methods Psychiatr. Res. 28:e1761. doi: 10.1002/mpr.1761,
D’Adamo, L., Paraboschi, L., Claire Grammer, A., Fennig, M., Graham, A. K., Yaeger, L. H., et al. (2023). Reach and uptake of digital mental health interventions based on cognitive-behavioral therapy for college students: a systematic review. J. Behav. Cogn. Therapy. 33, 97–117. doi: 10.1016/j.jbct.2023.05.002
De Croon, R., Van Houdt, L., Htun, N. N., Štiglic, G., Vanden Abeele, V., and Verbert, K. (2021). Health recommender systems: systematic review. J. Med. Internet Res. 23:e18035. doi: 10.2196/18035,
Dederichs, M., Weber, J., Pischke, C. R., Angerer, P., and Apolinário-Hagen, J. (2021). Exploring medical students’ views on digital mental health interventions: a qualitative study. Internet Interv. 25:100398. doi: 10.1016/j.invent.2021.100398,
Duffy, A., Keown-Stoneman, C., Goodday, S., Horrocks, J., Lowe, M., King, N., et al. (2020). Predictors of mental health and academic outcomes in first-year university students: identifying prevention and early-intervention targets. BJPsych open. 6:e46. doi: 10.1192/bjo.2020.24,
Ebert, D. D., Mortier, P., Kaehlke, F., Bruffaerts, R., Baumeister, H., Auerbach, R. P., et al. (2019). Barriers of mental health treatment utilization among first-year college students: first cross-national results from the WHO world mental health international college student initiative. Int. J. Methods Psychiatr. Res. 28:e1782. doi: 10.1002/mpr.1782,
Erdfelder, F., Begerau, H., Meyers, D., Quast, K. J., Schumacher, D., Brieden, T., et al. (2023). “Enhancing data protection via auditable informational separation of powers between workflow engine based agents: conceptualization, implementation, and first Cross-institutional experiences” in Studies in health technology and informatics. eds. M. Hägglund, M. Blusi, S. Bonacina, L. Nilsson, I. Cort Madsen, and S. Pelayo (IOS Press). 302, 317–321. doi: 10.3233/SHTI230126
Farahani, Z. T., Howard, E., Rashleigh, C., and Dooley, B. (2023). Data collection and outcome measurement in student counseling services in Irish higher education institutions: counselors’ views on challenges and facilitators. Psychol. Serv. 20, 136–149. doi: 10.1037/ser0000759,
Franzoi, I. G., Sauta, M. D., Carnevale, G., and Granieri, A. (2022). Student counseling centers in Europe: a retrospective analysis. Front. Psychol. 13:894423. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.894423,
Gao, J., Chou, B., McCaw, Z. R., Thurston, H., Varghese, P., Hong, C., et al. (2025). What is fair? Defining fairness in machine learning for health. Stat. Med. 44:e70234. doi: 10.1002/sim.70234
Grataloup, A., and Kurpicz-Briki, M. (2024). A systematic survey on the application of federated learning in mental state detection and human activity recognition. Front Digit Health. 6:1495999. doi: 10.3389/fdgth.2024.1495999,
Harrer, M., Adam, S. H., Fleischmann, R. J., Baumeister, H., Auerbach, R., Bruffaerts, R., et al. (2018). Effectiveness of an internet- and app-based intervention for college students with elevated stress: randomized controlled trial. J. Med. Internet Res. 20:e136. doi: 10.2196/jmir.9293,
Harrer, M., Apolinário-Hagen, J., Fritsche, L., Salewski, C., Zarski, A. C., Lehr, D., et al. (2021). Effect of an internet- and app-based stress intervention compared to online psychoeducation in university students with depressive symptoms: results of a randomized controlled trial. Internet Interv. 24:100374. doi: 10.1016/j.invent.2021.100374,
Hasanzadeh, F., Josephson, C. B., Waters, G., Adedinsewo, D., Azizi, Z., and White, J. A. (2025). Bias recognition and mitigation strategies in artificial intelligence healthcare applications. NPJ Digit Med. 8:154. doi: 10.1038/s41746-025-01503-7,
Heinrichs, K., Lehnchen, J., Burian, J., Deptolla, Z., Heumann, E., Helmer, S., et al. (2024). Mental and physical well-being among students in Germany: results from the StudiBiFra study. J. Public Health (Berl.). doi: 10.1007/s10389-024-02348-2
Heumann, E., Helmer, S. M., Busse, H., Negash, S., Horn, J., Pischke, C. R., et al. (2024). Depressive and anxiety symptoms among university students during the later stages of the COVID-19 pandemic in Germany - results from the COVID 19 German student well-being study (C19 GSWS). Front. Public Health 12:1459501. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1459501,
Hungerland, E., Sonntag, U., Polenz, W., Cusumano, V., Gläser, K., Hildebrand, C., et al. (2022). Impulse zur Stärkung der Gesundheitsförderung an Hochschulen: Vom Präventionsgesetz bis zur Hochschulgesetzgebung. Präv. Gesundheitsf. 17, 370–378. doi: 10.1007/s11553-021-00890-5,
Hutchesson, M., Burrows, T., Couper, L., Kavalec, S., Knapp, A., Harrison, Z., et al. (2025). Policies and strategies to promote optimal mental health of Australian university students: a document review. Health Prom J of Aust. 36:e70066. doi: 10.1002/hpja.70066,
Hyseni Duraku, Z., Davis, H., Arënliu, A., Uka, F., and Behluli, V. (2024). Overcoming mental health challenges in higher education: a narrative review. Front. Psychol. 15:1466060. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1466060,
Hyzy, M., Bond, R., Mulvenna, M., Bai, L., Dix, A., Leigh, S., et al. (2022). System usability scale benchmarking for digital health apps: Meta-analysis. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 10:e37290. doi: 10.2196/37290,
Ienca, M., and Malgieri, G. (2022). Mental data protection and the GDPR. J. Law Biosci. 9:lsac006. doi: 10.1093/jlb/lsac006,
Jaisoorya, T. S., Joseph, S., Kalarani, K. S., Menon, M., Smita, G. S., Shini, V. S., et al. (2023). Framework and overview of a state-wide college mental health program in Kerala, India. Indian J. Psychol. Med. 45, 526–532. doi: 10.1177/02537176221122407
John, D., Geißer, N., and Scheder, A. (2016). “Denkmuster im Unternehmen reflektieren: Qualitative Evaluation des Stressmanagement- Seminars “Think Positive”” in Fehlzeiten-Report 2016. eds. B. Badura, A. Ducki, H. Schröder, J. Klose, and M. Meyer (Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg), 215–224.
Karthan, M., Martin, R., Holl, F., Swoboda, W., Kestler, H. A., Pryss, R., et al. (2022). Enhancing mHealth data collection applications with sensing capabilities. Front. Public Health 10:926234. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.926234,
Kartikasari, D., Andarini, S., Wardhani, V., and Windarwati, H. D. (2025). Factors associated with mental health disorders in undergraduate students: a meta-analysis. Narra J. 5:e1962. doi: 10.52225/narra.v5i1.1962,
Khan, W., Jebanesan, B., Ahmed, S., Trimmer, C., Agic, B., Safa, F., et al. (2023). Stakeholders’ views and opinions on existing guidelines on “how to choose mental health apps.”. Front. Public Health 11:1251050. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1251050,
Krümmel, A., Laiker, I., Wrona, K. J., Aschentrup, L., and Dockweiler, C. (2023). Akzeptanz und Nutzungsbedingungen digitaler Interventionen zur Distressprävention bei Studierenden: Ergebnisse aus einer qualitativen Interviewstudie entlang der “unified theory of acceptance and use of technology” (UTAUT2). Präv Gesundheitsf. 18, 508–516. doi: 10.1007/s11553-022-00985-7,
Lablans, M., Borg, A., and Ückert, F. (2015). A RESTful interface to pseudonymization services in modern web applications. BMC Med. Inform. Decis. Mak. 15:2. doi: 10.1186/s12911-014-0123-5,
Li, W., Zhao, Z., Chen, D., Peng, Y., and Lu, Z. (2022). Prevalence and associated factors of depression and anxiety symptoms among college students: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Child Psychol. Psychiatry 63, 1222–1230. doi: 10.1111/jcpp.13606,
Löchner, J., Carlbring, P., Schuller, B., Torous, J., and Sander, L. B. (2025). Digital interventions in mental health: an overview and future perspectives. Internet Interv. 40:100824. doi: 10.1016/j.invent.2025.100824,
Luu, X. (2025). Towards comprehensive mental health promotion in Australian universities: a call to action with priorities for institutional change. Health Prom J of Aust. 36:e891. doi: 10.1002/hpja.891,
MacDonald, H., Lisnyj, K., and Papadopoulos, A. (2022). Facilitators and barriers highlighted by on-campus service providers for students seeking mental health services. CJHE 52, 81–95. doi: 10.47678/cjhe.v52i2.189145
Matos Fialho, P. M., Wenig, V., Heumann, E., Müller, M., Stock, C., and Pischke, C. R. (2025). Digital public health interventions for the promotion of mental well-being and health behaviors among university students: a rapid review. BMC Public Health 25:2500. doi: 10.1186/s12889-025-23669-1,
Montagni, I., Tzourio, C., Cousin, T., Sagara, J. A., Bada-Alonzi, J., and Horgan, A. (2020). Mental health-related digital use by university students: a systematic review. Telemedicine e-Health. 26, 131–146. doi: 10.1089/tmj.2018.0316,
Nair, M., Svedberg, P., Larsson, I., and Nygren, J. M. (2024). A comprehensive overview of barriers and strategies for AI implementation in healthcare: mixed-method design Six S, editor. PLoS One 19:e0305949. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0305949,
O’Rourke, T., Vogel, C., John, D., Pryss, R., Schobel, J., Haug, F., et al. (2022). The impact of coping styles and gender on situational coping: an ecological momentary assessment study with the mHealth application TrackYourStress. Front. Psychol. 13:913125. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.913125,
Osborn, T. G., Li, S., Saunders, R., and Fonagy, P. (2022). University students’ use of mental health services: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int. J. Ment. Heal. Syst. 16:57. doi: 10.1186/s13033-022-00569-0,
Paiva, U., Cortese, S., Flor, M., Moncada-Parra, A., Lecumberri, A., Eudave, L., et al. (2025). Prevalence of mental disorder symptoms among university students: an umbrella review. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 175:106244. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2025.106244,
Pei, J., Amanvermez, Y., Vigo, D., Puyat, J., Kessler, R. C., Mortier, P., et al. (2024). Sociodemographic correlates of mental health treatment seeking among college students: a systematic review and Meta-analysis. PS 75, 556–569. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.20230414,
Pizzo, R., Esposito, G., Passeggia, R., and Freda, M. F. (2024). Psychological counselling for students in higher education: a systematic review of its effectiveness on mental health and academic functioning. Couns. Psychol. Q., 1–21. doi: 10.1080/09515070.2024.2434533
Priestley, M., Broglia, E., Hughes, G., and Spanner, L. (2022). Student perspectives on improving mental health support services at university. Couns. Psychother. Res. 22, capr.12391. doi: 10.1002/capr.12391,
Pryss, R, John, D, Reichert, M, Hoppenstedt, B, Schmid, L, Schlee, W, et al. “Machine learning findings on geospatial data of users from the TrackYourStress mHealth Crowdsensing platform.” In: 2019 IEEE 20th international conference on information reuse and integration for data science (IRI). Los Angeles, CA, USA: IEEE; (2019) 350–355.
Pryss, R., John, D., Schlee, W., Schlotz, W., Schobel, J., Kraft, R., et al. (2019). Exploring the time trend of stress levels while using the Crowdsensing Mobile health platform, TrackYourStress, and the influence of perceived stress reactivity: ecological momentary assessment pilot study. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 7:e13978. doi: 10.2196/13978,
Pryss, R, Schobel, J, and Reichert, M. “Requirements for a flexible and generic API enabling Mobile Crowdsensing mHealth applications.” In: 2018 4th international workshop on requirements engineering for self-adaptive, collaborative, and cyber physical systems (RESACS). Banff, AB: IEEE; (2018) 24–31.
Read, A., Lutgens, D., and Malla, A. (2023). A descriptive overview of mental health services offered in post-secondary educational institutions across Canada. Can. J. Psychiatr. 68, 101–108. doi: 10.1177/07067437221128168,
Riboldi, I., Calabrese, A., Piacenti, S., Capogrosso, C. A., Paioni, S. L., Bartoli, F., et al. (2024). Understanding university students’ perspectives towards digital tools for mental health support: a Cross-country study. CPEMH. 20:e17450179271467. doi: 10.2174/0117450179271467231231060255,
Rolin, S. A., and Appelbaum, P. S. (2025). Expansion of colleges’ legal responsibilities regarding student mental health. Curr. Psychiatry Rep. 27, 450–455. doi: 10.1007/s11920-025-01611-x,
Roy, S., Biswas, A. K., and Sharma, M. (2025). Stress, anxiety, and depression as psychological distress among college and undergraduate students: a scoping review of reviews guided by the socio-ecological model. Health 13:1948. doi: 10.3390/healthcare13161948,
Sahan, F., Guthardt, L., Panitz, K., Siegel-Kianer, A., Eichhof, I., Schmitt, B. D., et al. (2024). Enhancing digital health awareness and mHealth competencies in medical education: proof-of-concept study and summative process evaluation of a quality improvement project. JMIR Med Educ. 10:e59454. doi: 10.2196/59454,
Schleicher, M., Unnikrishnan, V., Pryss, R., Schobel, J., Schlee, W., and Spiliopoulou, M. (2023). Prediction meets time series with gaps: user clusters with specific usage behavior patterns. Artif. Intell. Med. 142:102575. doi: 10.1016/j.artmed.2023.102575
Schweighart, R., Thätz, J., Demar, L., Zehl, F., Neuderth, S., and Löbmann, R. (2024). Welche Bedarfe haben Studierende hinsichtlich gesundheitsförderlicher Maßnahmen und welche sind ihnen bekannt? Eine Befragung an zwei Hochschulstandorten. Präv Gesundheitsf. 19, 277–285. doi: 10.1007/s11553-023-01031-w,
Shiffman, S., Stone, A. A., and Hufford, M. R. (2008). Ecological momentary assessment. Annu. Rev. Clin. Psychol. 4, 1–32. doi: 10.1146/annurev.clinpsy.3.022806.091415,
Skinner, E. A., Edge, K., Altman, J., and Sherwood, H. (2003). Searching for the structure of coping: a review and critique of category systems for classifying ways of coping. Psychol. Bull. 129, 216–269. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.129.2.216,
Slade, E., Rennick-Egglestone, S., Ng, F., Kotera, Y., Llewellyn-Beardsley, J., Newby, C., et al. (2024). The implementation of recommender Systems for Mental Health Recovery Narratives: evaluation of use and performance. JMIR Ment Health. 11:e45754. doi: 10.2196/45754,
Spitzer, M., Ullrich, T., and Ueckert, F. (2009). “Securing a web-based Teleradiology platform according to German law and “best practices&rdquo” in Studies in health technology and informatics (IOS Press). 150, 730–734.
Stinson, C. (2022). Algorithms are not neutral: Bias in collaborative filtering. AI Ethics. 2, 763–770. doi: 10.1007/s43681-022-00136-w,
Tapuria, A., Alexander, J., Marchal, A., Cong, C., Meinert, E., Shankar, R., et al. (2024). “Development of a mental health apps recommender platform” in Studies in health technology and informatics. eds. J. Mantas, A. Hasman, G. Demiris, K. Saranto, and M. Marschollek (IOS Press). 316, 1871–1872. doi: 10.3233/SHTI240796
Taylor, M. E., Liu, M., Abelson, S., Eisenberg, D., Lipson, S. K., and Schueller, S. M. (2024). The reach, effectiveness, adoption, implementation, and maintenance of digital mental health interventions for college students: a systematic review. Curr. Psychiatry Rep. 26, 683–693. doi: 10.1007/s11920-024-01545-w,
Till, B., Hofhansl, A., and Niederkrotenthaler, T. (2024). Effects of the mental health promotion seminar ‘coping with stress’ in the undergraduate medical curriculum of the Medical University of Vienna. BMC Med. Educ. 24:41. doi: 10.1186/s12909-023-05019-0,
Tsiouris, A., Werner, A. M., Tibubos, A. N., Mülder, L. M., Reichel, J. L., Heller, S., et al. (2023). Mental health state and its determinants in German university students across the COVID-19 pandemic: findings from three repeated cross-sectional surveys between 2019 and 2021. Front. Public Health 11:1163541. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1163541,
Valentine, L., D’Alfonso, S., and Lederman, R. (2023). Recommender systems for mental health apps: advantages and ethical challenges. AI & Soc. 38, 1627–1638. doi: 10.1007/s00146-021-01322-w,
Velmovitsky, P., Keown-Stoneman, C., J Pfisterer, K., Hews-Girard, J., Saliba, J., Saha, S., et al. (2025). Development of a recommendation engine to university student mental health support aligned with stepped care: longitudinal cohort study. J. Med. Internet Res. 27:e72669. doi: 10.2196/72669,
Vidović, S., Kotromanović, S., and Pogorelić, Z. (2024). Depression, anxiety, and stress symptoms among students in Croatia during the COVID-19 pandemic: a systematic review. JCMM 13:6240. doi: 10.3390/jcm13206240,
Vomhof, M., Bau, J. T., Hüter, P., Stehl, S., Haastert, B., Loerbroks, A., et al. (2024). Preferences regarding information strategies for digital mental health interventions among medical students: discrete choice experiment. JMIR Form Res. 8:e55921. doi: 10.2196/55921,
Wanniarachchi, V. U., Greenhalgh, C., Choi, A., and Warren, J. R. (2025). Personalization variables in digital mental health interventions for depression and anxiety in adolescents and youth: a scoping review. Front Digit Health. 7:1500220. doi: 10.3389/fdgth.2025.1500220,
Weber, J., Angerer, P., and Apolinário-Hagen, J. (2022). Physiological reactions to acute stressors and subjective stress during daily life: a systematic review on ecological momentary assessment (EMA) studies. PLoS One 17:e0271996. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0271996,
Yu, E., Han, P., and Fang, X. (2025). Exploring the mental health education policies of Chinese college students: based on policy text analysis and PMC-index model. Front. Public Health 13:1560582. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1560582,
Zhang, H., Mao, Y., Lin, Y., and Zhang, D. (2025). E-mental health in the age of AI: data safety, privacy regulations and recommendations. Alpha Psychiatry. 26:44279. doi: 10.31083/AP44279,
Keywords: mental health, recommender systems, digital health, student health services, health promotion, universities, ecological momentary assessment, student well-being
Citation: Apolinário-Hagen J, Schobel J, Helten A-K, Sahan F, Pryss R and John D (2026) We don’t need more apps, we need connection: recommender systems as under-explored chance to promote students’ mental health at universities. Front. Psychol. 16:1629265. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1629265
Edited by:
Adelinda Araujo Candeias, University of Evora, PortugalReviewed by:
Juan José Martí-Noguera, Digital Mental Health Consortium, SpainAntónio Fernando Portelada, Polytechnic Institute of Santarém, Portugal
Copyright © 2026 Apolinário-Hagen, Schobel, Helten, Sahan, Pryss and John. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Jennifer Apolinário-Hagen, amVubmlmZXIuYXBvbGluYXJpby5oYWdlbkBoaHUuZGU=
†These authors have contributed equally to this work