Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW article

Front. Psychol.

Sec. Sport Psychology

Volume 16 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1632555

This article is part of the Research TopicExploring the cognitive benefits of physical activity in young peopleView all 3 articles

Multilevel meta-analysis of the effect of exercise intervention on inhibitory control in children with ASD

Provisionally accepted
  • 1Beijing Normal University College of Physical Education and Sports, Beijing, China
  • 2University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Background: Inhibitory control deficits represent a core cognitive challenge for children with Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD), impacting behavioral regulation, social interaction, and adaptive functioning. Exercise interventions have emerged as promising non-pharmacological approaches for cognitive enhancement, yet their specific effects on inhibitory control in the ASD population remain unclear. This study aimed to systematically evaluate the efficacy of exercise interventions on inhibitory control in children and adolescents with ASD. Methods: This systematic review and multilevel meta-analysis followed PRISMA guidelines and was prospectively registered (PROSPERO: CRD420251039964). We systematically searched five electronic databases (PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, Cochrane Library, and CNKI) from inception to December 2023. Randomized and quasi-randomized controlled trials evaluating exercise interventions for inhibitory control in ASD populations were included. Study quality was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool (ROB2). Effect sizes were calculated as standardized mean differences (SMDs) and synthesized using a three-level meta-analytic approach to account for dependency among effect sizes. Subgroup analyses and meta-regression explored potential moderators of intervention efficacy. Results: Ten studies comprising 466 participants (229 in intervention groups) met inclusion criteria. Exercise interventions demonstrated significant positive effects on inhibitory control in children with ASD (SMD = 0.66, 95% CI [0.44, 0.88]). Structured exercise interventions showed differential efficacy, with Mini Basketball (SMD = 0.95), Martial Arts (SMD = 0.90), and Bicycle Learning (SMD = 0.86) yielding the largest effects. Meta-regression identified total training duration as a significant positive predictor of intervention efficacy (β = 0.027, p = 0.015), while participant age showed a potential negative association (β = -0.091, p = 0.083), suggesting enhanced effectiveness in younger children. Conclusions: This meta-analysis provides robust evidence supporting exercise interventions, particularly structured activities combining physical and cognitive demands, for improving inhibitory control in children with ASD. The findings suggest important clinical implications for intervention design, highlighting the value of adequate intervention duration and early implementation. Future research should address methodological limitations through high-quality trials with standardized protocols and extended follow-up periods.

Keywords: Autism Spectrum Disorder, Executive Function, physical activity, cognitive enhancement, Neurodevelopmental disorders, Multilevel meta-analysis

Received: 24 May 2025; Accepted: 16 Sep 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Xiangqin, Yaoqi, Zonghan and Shenning. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Hou Yaoqi, marksman497@qq.com

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.