Ping Yong
Junhui Zhang- 1College of International Education, Sichuan International Studies University, Chongqing, China
- 2Department of Foreign Languages, Army Medical University, Chongqing, China
Introduction: Teacher stress is a growing concern in educational settings worldwide. Grounded in the Conservation of Resources (COR) theory, this study investigates how principals’ transformational leadership influences role stress among primary and secondary school teachers. It particularly focuses on the mediating roles of affective commitment and job satisfaction.
Methods: A quantitative survey was conducted among 433 teachers in China. Data were analyzed using structural equation modeling (SEM) and the PROCESS macro to explore both direct and indirect effects of transformational leadership on teacher role stress.
Results: Transformational leadership was found to significantly reduce teachers’ role stress (direct effect = −0.185, 95% CI = [−0.277, −0.093]). Additionally, both affective commitment and job satisfaction served as significant mediators. Affective commitment exerted the strongest individual mediating effect (standardized indirect effect = −0.045, 95% CI = [−0.072, −0.021]), while the sequential mediation pathway involving both variables also reached statistical significance (standardized indirect effect = −0.018, 95% CI = [−0.031, −0.008]).
Discussion: The study found that transformational leadership reduces teachers’ role stress both directly and indirectly through affective commitment and job satisfaction. These results extend the application of COR theory by identifying emotional and motivational factors as key mediators. The findings also offer practical implications for enhancing teacher well-being through school leadership development.
1 Introduction
The focus of school management research worldwide has gradually shifted from system efficiency to teachers’ well-being and psychological states (Collie et al., 2012, 2016; Collie, 2023; Dreer, 2023). In China, teachers in primary and secondary schools face increasingly complex professional responsibilities—ranging from instructional delivery to administrative tasks and student management—which contribute significantly to role stress (Yong and Peng, 2025). Role stress typically arises from role conflict, role ambiguity, and role overload (Rizzo et al., 1970; Nordenmark, 2004), and is considered a critical factor affecting teachers’ well-being and professional performance (Kyriacou, 2001; Papastylianou et al., 2009; Collie et al., 2016). Existing studies indicate that primary and secondary school teachers generally experience high levels of work-related stress, with notable differences based on region, educational background, teaching level, and years of experience (Liu and Onwuegbuzie, 2012; Zhang et al., 2023; Collie, 2023). Despite widespread recognition of this problem, empirical research has paid insufficient attention to how school leadership may alleviate role stress through specific psychological mechanisms.
Transformational leadership (Bass, 1985; Bass and Riggio, 2006) has consistently been associated with positive organizational outcomes, including enhanced job satisfaction, teacher engagement, and organizational commitment, particularly within educational contexts (Nguni et al., 2006; Braun et al., 2013; Yu and Jang, 2024; El Achi et al., 2025). Most of these studies have focused on its motivational functions or performance-enhancing effects. While this growing body of research highlights the constructive influence of transformational leadership on desirable outcomes, it tends to marginalize its potential role in alleviating negative psychological states such as stress or burnout. Although a few investigations have linked transformational leadership to the reduction of negative outcomes such as burnout and deviant behaviors (Khan et al., 2020; Qi et al., 2022), recent studies within educational settings suggest similar effects—for example, Tsang et al. (2022) found that transformational leadership reduced teachers’ burnout by enhancing their psychological empowerment—yet empirical evidence on its capacity to alleviate teachers’ specific role stress remains limited. This gap is especially salient in high-pressure environments such as China’s primary and secondary school systems, where teachers frequently face excessive workloads, role conflict, and role ambiguity (Liu and Onwuegbuzie, 2012; Zhang et al., 2023). Accordingly, investigating the potential of transformational leadership to buffer role-related stress holds both theoretical and practical value for the advancement of educational leadership research.
Although initial empirical evidence in China has begun to examine related psychological mechanisms—such as psychological empowerment (Tsang et al., 2022) and inclusive role identity (Wang et al., 2024)—these studies do not address teacher role stress. Moreover, a systematic review of transformational leadership in Chinese K–12 settings from 2010 to 2019 concluded that few studies have explored its psychological or affective mediating mechanisms, and constructs like role stress remain notably underrepresented in this body of research (Li, 2022).
Accordingly, this study examines how principals’ transformational leadership reduces teachers’ role stress through the dual mediation of affective commitment and job satisfaction. By integrating leadership theory with Conservation of Resources (COR) and emphasizing a mechanism-focused model, the study contributes a nuanced explanation of how school leadership can enhance teacher well-being in demanding educational contexts.
2 Theoretical framework and research hypotheses
2.1 Conservation of resources theory
This study adopts COR theory (Hobfoll, 1989, 2001, 2011) as its guiding framework. COR theory posits that individuals strive to acquire, protect, and maintain valued resources, and psychological stress occurs when these resources are threatened or lost. In educational and organizational contexts, COR theory has been widely applied to explain how leadership functions as a contextual resource that buffers against job demands (Bakker and Demerouti, 2017; Hobfoll et al., 2018).
In line with this framework, transformational leadership functions as a contextual resource that helps teachers cope with role-related stressors such as ambiguity and overload. According to COR theory, such leadership provides emotional support, goal clarity, and recognition, helping individuals conserve and build psychological resources (Hobfoll, 2011; Halbesleben et al., 2014). Empirical evidence in Chinese contexts supports this function. Tsang et al. (2022) found that transformational leadership alleviated teacher burnout by enhancing psychological empowerment among 339 primary and secondary educators. Additionally, Zhan et al. (2023) demonstrated that instructional leadership in Chinese schools indirectly reduced role stress via affective commitment, confirming that leadership acts as a resource buffer.
Under COR theory, both affective commitment and job satisfaction serve as personal psychological resources that help individuals cope with role stress (Hobfoll, 2001; Halbesleben et al., 2014). Empirically, Zhan et al. (2023) found that in Chinese primary and secondary schools, leadership reduced role stress through enhancing affective commitment. Likewise, studies in educational settings have consistently demonstrated that transformational leadership positively predicts teachers’ job satisfaction, which in turn reduces perceived work stress (Kaya, 2024). These findings affirm that both constructs are valid resource-based mediators justifying their inclusion in this study’s framework. Together, these theoretical and empirical foundations justify the proposed mediation model under the COR framework, offering a coherent explanation of how leadership builds internal resources to alleviate stress.
2.2 The influence of transformational leadership on teachers’ role stress, affective commitment, and job satisfaction
The theory of transformational leadership was initially introduced by Burns (1978) and later expanded by Bass (1985), emphasizing that leaders inspire individuals to exceed expectations by shaping a vision, stimulating higher-order needs, and fostering organizational trust. Geijsel et al. (2003) highlighted the critical role of transformational leadership in complex educational reforms, as it enhances teachers’ commitment and capabilities, thereby facilitating organizational change in schools. More recently, Berkovich (2016) emphasized the need to contextualize transformational leadership theory within educational environments, noting both its influence on teacher engagement and its limitations in dynamic school settings.
Empirical studies suggest that transformational leadership can improve school climate, enhance teachers’ professional identity, and reduce work-related conflicts, which in turn alleviates teachers’ role stress (Alzoraiki et al., 2024; Kovjanic et al., 2013; Lin et al., 2022; Tsang et al., 2022). From the COR perspective, From the COR perspective, transformational leadership provides key contextual resources—including vision clarity, emotional support, and individualized recognition—that help teachers better manage their role expectations and reduce resource loss (Halbesleben et al., 2014; Hobfoll, 1989).
Accordingly, we hypothesize:H1: Principals’ transformational leadership negatively influences teachers’ role stress.
Transformational leadership also plays an important role in cultivating internal psychological resources. Affective commitment reflects emotional attachment and identification with the school, which fosters greater investment in work roles and resilience in stressful contexts (Meyer and Allen, 1991; Klassen and Chiu, 2011; Kılınç et al., 2024). Studies in educational settings have consistently shown that transformational leadership fosters affective commitment by conveying shared purpose and individual care (Keskes et al., 2018; Nguni et al., 2006; Ross and Gray, 2006; Shao et al., 2022).
H2: Principals’ transformational leadership positively influences teachers’ affective commitment.
Job satisfaction is another internal resource that enhances positive affect and buffers stress. Teachers with high job satisfaction experience fewer negative outcomes such as burnout and role conflict (Bogler and Somech, 2004; Kaya, 2024; Lei et al., 2024). Transformational leadership improves satisfaction by empowering teachers and enhancing role clarity (Aydın et al., 2013; Polatcan and Cansoy, 2019; Bibi et al., 2022).
H3: Principals’ transformational leadership positively influences teachers’ job satisfaction.
2.3 The mediating role of affective commitment and job satisfaction
Affective commitment has been shown to reduce emotional exhaustion and role overload by increasing teachers’ engagement and willingness to navigate job demands (Kaur, 2020; Washburn et al., 2022). Teachers with stronger affective commitment are more likely to reframe challenges positively and persevere in difficult situations, thereby reducing role stress.
H4: Affective commitment partially mediates the relationship between principals’ transformational leadership and teachers’ role stress.
Job satisfaction functions similarly by promoting positive appraisal and work engagement, which leads to lower perceived role conflict and ambiguity (Collie et al., 2012; Jaafar, 2021; Singh et al., 2019).
H5: Job satisfaction partially mediates the relationship between principals’ transformational leadership and teachers’ role stress.
From a sequential mediation perspective, affective commitment and job satisfaction may jointly transmit the influence of transformational leadership on role stress. According to COR theory, transformational leadership first strengthens teachers’ emotional attachment (i.e., affective commitment), which in turn enhances their positive affect and intrinsic motivation, leading to increased job satisfaction (Meyer and Allen, 1991; Klassen and Chiu, 2011). Higher job satisfaction enables teachers to appraise work demands more positively, thereby reducing role stress (Collie et al., 2012; Choi and Kang, 2021). This sequential pathway highlights how psychological and affective resources are built progressively, buffering stress in a layered manner (Hobfoll, 2001; Halbesleben et al., 2014). Therefore, we propose the following hypothesis:
H6: Affective commitment and job satisfaction sequentially mediate the relationship between principals’ transformational leadership and teachers’ role stress.
2.4 Research framework
As illustrated in Figure 1, the model proposes that transformational leadership reduces teachers’ role stress through the dual mediation of affective commitment and job satisfaction.
Figure 1. Research model of the direct and indirect effects of transformational leadership on role stress.
3 Research methodology
3.1 Data collection and sample
This study aims to examine the direct and indirect effects of principals’ transformational leadership on teachers’ role stress, with a particular focus on the mediating roles of affective commitment and job satisfaction. A cross-sectional survey design was employed, and data were collected using a structured questionnaire to test the proposed hypotheses. Additionally, the Bootstrap method with 5,000 resamples was used to test the mediating effects of affective commitment and job satisfaction in the relationship between transformational leadership and role stress, ensuring the robustness of the estimation results.
The study targeted primary and secondary school teachers in City C, China. This location was selected due to its rapid educational development and recent policy-driven reforms, which have significantly increased the workload and responsibilities of local teachers. City C features a diverse mix of urban and suburban schools, including both public and private institutions, making it a representative context for investigating how leadership practices impact teacher well-being. The city’s varied teacher demographics and wide range of school types also enhance the external validity and generalizability of the findings.
To improve representativeness, we employed a stratified random sampling method. The sample was stratified based on key demographic and organizational variables, including school type (primary vs. secondary), school location (urban vs. suburban), and teacher characteristics such as gender, years of teaching experience, and educational background. Within each stratum, participants were randomly selected to ensure proportional representation across different subgroups. A total of 502 questionnaires were distributed, with 433 valid responses collected, resulting in an effective response rate of 86.2%. Among the valid respondents: Gender distribution: 360 female teachers (83.1%) and 73 male teachers (16.9%). Educational background: 45 teachers (10.4%) had a bachelor’s degree or lower, 308 teachers (71.1%) held a bachelor’s degree, and 80 teachers (18.5%) had a master’s degree or higher. School type: 263 respondents (60.7%) were primary school teachers, while 170 (39.3%) were secondary school teachers.
This study adhered to strict academic ethical guidelines. Before participation, all respondents were fully informed about the research objectives, and participation was entirely voluntary. The study ensured participants’ privacy and data confidentiality, with all collected data used solely for research purposes. Additionally, the questionnaire survey received approval from the institutional ethics committee, ensuring compliance with ethical research standards.
3.2 Variable measurement
This study employed a structured questionnaire for data collection, consisting of five sections:
Demographic Characteristics: Participants provided information on gender, age, education level, teaching experience, and school type.
Transformational Leadership Scale: The Chinese Transformational School Leadership Questionnaire developed by Liu (2013) was used, which consists of four dimensions and 29 items, measured on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree). This scale has been widely used and validated in Chinese educational settings. In this study, the Cronbach’s alpha was 0.96.
Affective Commitment Scale: The affective commitment subscale from the Organizational Commitment Questionnaire developed by Meyer et al. (1993) was adopted, consisting of six items, measured on a 5-point Likert scale. This scale has been translated into Chinese and applied in previous studies involving Chinese teachers. The Cronbach’s alpha for this study was 0.90.
Job Satisfaction Scale: The job satisfaction scale translated by Shu and Liang (2015) from Hackman and Oldham (1974) was used, comprising three items, measured on a 5-point Likert scale. This translated scale has demonstrated good reliability in prior Chinese samples. In this study, the Cronbach’s alpha was 0.82.
Role Stress Scale: Role stress was assessed using a 13-item scale originally developed by Peterson et al. (1995), and revised for Chinese educational settings by Li and Zhang (2005). This scale measures role conflict, role ambiguity, and role overload, consisting of 13 items, measured on a 5-point Likert scale. The Cronbach’s alpha in this study was 0.95.
4 Research results
4.1 Common method bias (CMB) test
To minimize the impact of CMB, this study implemented several control measures during both the data collection and analysis phases. During data collection, anonymous questionnaires were used, along with reverse-coded items and randomized question order to reduce respondents’ subjective biases. For data analysis, Harman’s single-factor test was conducted to detect CMB. The results showed that the largest single factor accounted for 32.5% of the total variance, which is below the 40% threshold commonly recommended to indicate the presence of substantial common method variance (Podsakoff et al., 2003). These results suggest that CMB is unlikely to pose a serious threat to the validity of the study’s findings.
4.2 Exploratory factor analysis (EFA)
To evaluate the construct validity of the measurement instrument, an EFA was conducted using principal component analysis with Promax rotation. The Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin (KMO) measure of sampling adequacy was 0.955, exceeding the recommended threshold of 0.80, indicating that the data were suitable for factor analysis. Bartlett’s Test of Sphericity was also significant (χ2 = 17964.641, df = 1275, p < 0.001), supporting the factorability of the correlation matrix.
Using the eigenvalue-greater-than-one criterion and scree plot analysis, nine common factors were extracted, explaining a total of 85.556% of the cumulative variance. All items demonstrated high factor loadings (≥0.737), exceeding the recommended threshold of 0.40, with no cross-loadings observed. This confirmed the convergence and discriminant validity of the measurement items across factors.
Items clustered consistently with their theoretical constructs: transformational leadership (items XA1–XD5), affective commitment (M11–M16), job satisfaction (M21–M23), and role stress (YA1–YC5), supporting the intended multidimensional structure of the scale. No item deletion was required, and all items retained strong psychometric properties. A summary of representative items and factor loadings is presented in Table 1.
Table 1. Factor loadings from exploratory factor analysis (EFA).
4.3 Descriptive statistical analysis
The means, standard deviations, and correlation coefficients for all variables are presented in Table 2. The results indicate that principals’ transformational leadership is positively correlated with teachers’ affective commitment and job satisfaction (p < 0.01) while showing a significant negative correlation with teachers’ role stress (p < 0.01). Additionally, affective commitment is positively correlated with job satisfaction but negatively correlated with role stress. Similarly, job satisfaction is significantly negatively correlated with role stress. These preliminary findings provide initial support for the research hypotheses.
Table 2. Means, standard deviations, and correlation coefficients of variables.
4.4 Reliability and validity analysis
We conducted structural equation modeling (SEM) using AMOS 26.0 to test the hypothesized model fit and evaluate the measurement model’s reliability and validity. The model fit was assessed using multiple indices, including the Normed Fit Index (NFI), Incremental Fit Index (IFI), Relative Fit Index (RFI), Comparative Fit Index (CFI), Tucker–Lewis Index (TLI), Root Mean Square Error of Approximation (RMSEA), and Standardized Root Mean Square Residual (SRMR). The results indicate that the model fit indices demonstrate a good fit (CMIN/DF = 1.118, RMSEA = 0.017, NFI = 0.903, IFI = 0.992, TLI = 0.991, CFI = 0.992, RFI = 0.924), supporting the adequacy of the measurement model. The CFA results are presented in Figure 2.
Figure 2. The CFA model for measurement validity.
The reliability and validity of the measurement model were assessed using Composite Reliability (CR) and Average Variance Extracted (AVE). As shown in Table 3, all latent variables had CR values exceeding 0.70 and AVE values greater than 0.50, meeting the criteria proposed by Fornell and Larcker (1981). These results indicate that the observed variables adequately explain their respective latent constructs, demonstrating strong convergent validity.
Table 3. Reliability and validity analysis of measurement instruments.
Discriminant validity was evaluated following Fornell and Larcker’s (1981) criteria. The results showed that the square root of each AVE exceeded its correlations with other constructs, and the Maximum Shared Variance (MSV) was lower than the AVE, confirming that all latent variables exhibit sufficient discriminant validity.
Overall, these findings suggest that the measurement model has high reliability and validity, providing a solid foundation for further data analysis in this study.
4.5 SEM analysis
This study employed the maximum likelihood estimation (MLE) method to test the proposed structural equation model using AMOS 26.0. As shown in Figure 3, the model fit indices demonstrated good fit: χ2 = 1825.221, df = 1211, χ2/df = 1.507, p < 0.001, CFI = 0.965, RMSEA = 0.034, and SRMR = 0.080. These values meet the commonly recommended thresholds (Hu and Bentler, 1999), supporting the adequacy of the model.
Figure 3. Structural equation model of the effects of transformational leadership on teachers’ role stress.
The model fit indices indicate a good overall model fit, supporting the validity of the proposed model, as shown in Table 4.
Table 4. Structural model fit indices.
4.6 Mediation effect test
This study used PROCESS Model 6 (Hayes, 2018) to examine the serial mediation effect of affective commitment and job satisfaction between transformational leadership and teachers’ role stress. The Bootstrap method (5,000 resamples, 95% CI) was applied to ensure result robustness. Mediation is considered significant if the confidence interval (Boot LLCI–Boot ULCI) does not contain zero. Table 5 presents the results.
Table 5. Bootstrap analysis of serial mediation effects.
The results indicate that transformational leadership has a significant total effect on teachers’ role stress, supporting H1. After controlling for mediating variables, the direct effect remains significant, suggesting that transformational leadership continues to directly influence role stress. Additionally, the total indirect effect is significant, indicating the presence of multiple mediation pathways, supporting H2, H3, and H4. Specifically, both single mediation paths are significant, with affective commitment playing a more prominent role. The sequential mediation effect is relatively smaller but remains significant.
In terms of standardized estimates, transformational leadership significantly increased affective commitment (β = 0.51, p < 0.001) and job satisfaction (β = 0.44, p < 0.001), while both mediators negatively predicted role stress (AC → RS: β = −0.27, p < 0.001; JST → RS: β = −0.23, p < 0.001). The sequential path TL → AC → JST → RS also yielded a small but significant effect (β = −0.018, 95% CI [−0.031, −0.008]). These results align with COR theory, suggesting that transformational leadership cultivates internal psychological resources that buffer against role-related stress. Affective commitment played a stronger mediating role than job satisfaction, highlighting the importance of emotional attachment in helping teachers cope with occupational stress.
Overall, the findings suggest that affective commitment and job satisfaction partially mediate the relationship between transformational leadership and role stress, with affective commitment being the stronger mediator.
5 Discussion
Grounded in COR theory, this study examined the impact of transformational leadership on teachers’ role stress and analyzed the mediating roles of affective commitment and job satisfaction. The findings indicate that transformational leadership effectively reduces teachers’ role stress, with affective commitment and job satisfaction partially mediating this relationship.
Based on these results, this section provides an in-depth discussion of the findings, highlights the theoretical contributions and practical implications, and proposes directions for future research.
5.1 Discussion of findings
This study found that transformational leadership significantly and negatively predicts teachers’ role stress. This confirms prior research suggesting that supportive and motivating leadership styles reduce stress related to role ambiguity, conflict, and overload (Leithwood and Jantzi, 2006; Tsang et al., 2022). Under the COR theory (Hobfoll, 1989, 2001), leadership acts as a contextual resource by providing goal clarity, emotional support, and recognition—key mechanisms that help conserve psychological energy and reduce resource depletion (Halbesleben et al., 2014).
Consistent with this, the study further identified affective commitment and job satisfaction as significant mediators. This aligns with existing COR-based studies, which argue that emotional attachment (i.e., affective commitment) and positive work evaluations (i.e., job satisfaction) function as personal resources that mitigate stress responses (Kaya, 2024; Zhan et al., 2023). Transformational leaders cultivate trust and a sense of purpose, which help strengthen teachers’ affective commitment and job satisfaction. These strengthened internal resources, in turn, serve to reduce perceived role stress. This pathway aligns with Meyer and Allen’s (Meyer and Allen, 1991) model, which conceptualizes affective commitment as a motivational force, and Collie et al.’s (2012) findings that job satisfaction enhances teacher well-being.
However, while the findings align with COR theory, minor contextual differences emerge. For instance, the mediating strength of affective commitment may be heightened in collectivist cultures like China’s, where emotional bonds to institutions are valued more highly than in Western contexts (Hofstede, 2001). Such cultural factors may explain stronger indirect effects observed in this study compared to Western-based research.
Theoretically, this study contributes by integrating COR theory with educational leadership, clarifying not just the presence of effects, but their resource-based mechanisms. It advances the literature by empirically validating that transformational leadership not only exerts direct effects, but also builds psychological resources that mediate stress pathways.
5.2 Theoretical contributions
This study makes several theoretical contributions:
First, it introduces a sequential mediation framework, demonstrating how transformational leadership alleviates teachers’ role stress via two successive psychological resources: affective commitment and job satisfaction. While prior studies have explored related mechanisms—for instance, Choi and Kang (2021) tested a serial mediation linking leadership to teacher self-efficacy, and Kaya (2024) examined job satisfaction and professional resilience as mediators in Chinese educational settings—few have directly modeled dual bridging paths between leadership and stress reduction. This study extends the literature by integrating both mediators within a unified explanatory framework. It also responds to calls for more nuanced, multistep models in high-demand educational contexts (Tsang et al., 2022). Furthermore, Leithwood and Sun’s (2012) meta-review emphasized the influence of transformational leadership on teacher outcomes through complex mediating structures; however, few studies have empirically validated such mechanisms in stress-alleviation contexts. By addressing this gap, the current study refines the conceptualization of transformational leadership pathways in teacher stress management.
Second, drawing on COR theory, this study clarifies how transformational leadership enhances teachers’ psychological resource reserves to effectively manage role stress. COR theory posits that individuals cope with stress by acquiring and preserving valued resources. By demonstrating the positive impact of transformational leadership on these internal resources, the study offers a concrete explanation of how leadership behavior buffers teachers against role demands. While prior research by Kaya (2024) and Tsang et al. (2022) supported resource-based interpretations, Hobfoll et al. (2018) highlighted that stress coping involves layered and sequential resource accumulation—a notion directly reflected in the dual-mediation model tested here. Thus, this study both extends and deepens the theoretical application of COR theory in educational stress contexts.
Finally, this study contributes to the growing recognition of school leadership as a proactive intervention for teacher stress. Much of the prior literature has focused on the antecedents or symptoms of stress, while relatively few have examined leadership’s role in shaping adaptive psychological resources. Liu (2018), in a comprehensive review of transformational leadership research in China, noted the limited empirical attention to mediating and moderating mechanisms, particularly at the individual psychological level. By empirically validating affective commitment and job satisfaction as internal mediators, our study addresses this gap in the Chinese context and provides localized evidence for designing culturally grounded school-level interventions that support teachers’ psychological well-being.
5.3 Practical implications
The findings of this study provide significant practical insights for school administrators and educational policymakers, highlighting the critical role of transformational leadership in alleviating teachers’ role stress, enhancing job satisfaction, and fostering professional well-being.
First, school administrators should actively foster transformational leadership practices by creating a shared school vision, offering individualized support, and encouraging professional innovation. This can be operationalized through structured one-on-one mentoring programs, leadership development workshops, and regular professional feedback meetings. Schools should also implement goal alignment initiatives that connect teachers’ personal development plans with the school’s strategic objectives, thereby reinforcing their sense of value and commitment.
Second, strengthening teachers’ affective commitment and job satisfaction is key to mitigating stress. Leaders should cultivate a supportive work environment by enhancing teacher autonomy, recognizing contributions, and involving teachers in decision-making. Practical strategies include establishing peer-nominated teacher award programs, expanding opportunities for teachers to serve on school governance committees, and creating transparent feedback channels that validate teachers’ voices in curriculum and policy development.
Third, policymakers should support schools in building a systemic framework for teacher stress management. This includes promoting data-informed workload monitoring platforms, refining class scheduling procedures, and instituting early-warning systems for burnout. Additionally, educational departments can mandate stress management modules in teacher training, expand access to school-based mental health services, and incentivize schools that implement innovative teacher wellness programs.
Collectively, these strategies offer a holistic and sustainable framework for schools and policymakers to proactively reduce teachers’ role stress, enhance professional well-being, and improve overall educational quality in increasingly demanding educational environments.
5.4 Research limitations and future directions
Despite its contributions, this study has certain limitations that suggest directions for future research.
First, this study adopted a cross-sectional design, which limits the ability to establish causal relationships. Future studies could employ a longitudinal research design to better capture the long-term effects of transformational leadership on teachers’ role stress and provide more robust evidence for causality.
Second, the sample was drawn exclusively from primary and secondary school teachers in Southwest China, meaning that the findings may be influenced by regional cultural contexts and educational policies. Future research could expand the scope to other regions and international samples to examine the generalizability of the findings across diverse educational and policy environments.
6 Conclusion
Grounded in COR theory, this study examined the impact mechanism of transformational leadership on teachers’ role stress and confirmed the mediating roles of affective commitment and job satisfaction. The findings suggest that transformational leadership indirectly reduces role stress by strengthening teachers’ affective commitment and enhancing job satisfaction.
These findings not only extend the application of transformational leadership theory in the educational domain but also provide practical guidance for school administrators, offering insights into leadership strategies that can effectively reduce teachers’ role stress and improve their overall well-being.
Data availability statement
The original contributions presented in this study are included in this article/supplementary material, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.
Ethics statement
The studies involving humans were approved by the Ethics Committee of the College of International Education, Sichuan International Studies University, Chongqing, China. The studies were conducted in accordance with the local legislation and institutional requirements. The participants provided their written informed consent to participate in this study.
Author contributions
PY: Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal Analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Writing – original draft. JZ: Funding acquisition, Project administration, Resources, Software, Supervision, Validation, Visualization, Writing – review and editing.
Funding
The author(s) declare that no financial support was received for the research and/or publication of this article.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Generative AI statement
The authors declare that Gen AI was used in the creation of this manuscript. Generative AI tools (e.g., ChatGPT) were used to assist with English language translation and expression polishing of the manuscript. All intellectual content, interpretation of results, and final decisions were made solely by the authors.
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
References
Alzoraiki, M., Ahmad, A. R., Ateeq, A., and Milhem, M. (2024). The role of transformational leadership in enhancing school culture and teaching performance in Yemeni public schools. Front. Educ. 9:1413607. doi: 10.3389/feduc.2024.1413607
Aydın, A., Sarier, Y., and Uysal, Ş (2013). The effect of school principals’ leadership styles on teachers’ organizational commitment and job satisfaction. Educ. Sci. 13, 806–811. doi: 10.11591/ijere.v12i3.25225
Bakker, A. B., and Demerouti, E. (2017). Job demands–resources theory: Taking stock and looking forward. J. Occup. Health Psychol. 22, 273–285. doi: 10.1037/ocp0000056
Bass, B. M., and Riggio, R. E. (2006). Transformational Leadership, 2nd Edn. Hove: Psychology Press. doi: 10.4324/9781410617095
Berkovich, I. (2016). School leaders and transformational leadership theory: Time to part ways? J. Educ. Admin. 54, 609–622. doi: 10.1108/JEA-11-2015-0100
Bibi, S., Kanwal, W., and Parveen, K. (2022). Effect of transformational leadership style on job satisfaction of university teachers. J. Manage. Pract. Human. Soc. Sci. 6:1. doi: 10.33152/jmphss-6.1.7
Bogler, R., and Somech, A. (2004). Influence of teacher empowerment on teachers’ organizational commitment, professional commitment and organizational citizenship behavior in schools. Teach. Teach. Educ. 20, 277–289. doi: 10.1016/j.tate.2004.02.003
Braun, S., Peus, C., Weisweiler, S., and Frey, D. (2013). Transformational leadership, job satisfaction, and team performance: A multilevel mediation model of trust. Leadersh. Q. 24, 270–283. doi: 10.1016/j.leaqua.2012.11.006
Choi, J., and Kang, W. (2021). Effects of transformational leadership on teachers’ self-efficacy in education for sustainable development: A serial mediation analysis. Cypriot J. Educ. Sci. 16, 2534–2547. doi: 10.18844/cjes.v16i5.6343
Collie, R. J. (2023). Teacher well-being and turnover intentions: Investigating the roles of job resources and job demands. Br. J. Educ. Psychol. 93, 712–726. doi: 10.1111/bjep.12587
Collie, R. J., Shapka, J. D., and Perry, N. E. (2012). School climate and social–emotional learning: Predicting teacher stress, job satisfaction, and teaching efficacy. J. Educ. Psychol. 104, 1189–1204. doi: 10.1037/a0029356
Collie, R. J., Shapka, J. D., Perry, N. E., and Martin, A. J. (2016). Teachers’ psychological functioning in the workplace: Exploring the roles of contextual beliefs, need satisfaction, and personal characteristics. J. Educ. Psychol. 108, 788–799. doi: 10.1037/edu0000088
Dreer, B. (2023). On the outcomes of teacher wellbeing: A systematic review of research. Front. Psychol. 14:1205179. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1205179
El Achi, S., Jabbour Al Maalouf, N., Barakat, H., and Mawad, J. L. (2025). The impact of transformational leadership and work environment on teachers’ performance in crisis-affected educational settings. Admin. Sci. 15:7. doi: 10.3390/admsci15070256
Fornell, C., and Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. J. Mark. Res. 18, 39–50. doi: 10.2307/3151312
Geijsel, F., Sleegers, P., Leithwood, K., and Jantzi, D. (2003). Transformational leadership effects on teachers’ commitment and effort toward school reform. J. Educ. Admin. 41, 228–256. doi: 10.1108/09578230310474403
Hackman, J. R., and Oldham, G. R. (1974). The Job Diagnostic Survey: An Instrument for the Diagnosis of Jobs and the Evaluation of Job Redesign Projects (Report No. ED099580). NewYork, NY: ERIC.
Halbesleben, J. R. B., Neveu, J.-P., Paustian-Underdahl, S. C., and Westman, M. (2014). Getting to the “COR”: Understanding the role of resources in conservation of resources theory. J. Manage. 40, 1334–1364. doi: 10.1177/0149206314527130
Hayes, A. F. (2018). Introduction to Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional Process Analysis: A Regression-Based Approach, 2nd Edn. New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
Hobfoll, S. E. (1989). Conservation of resources: A new attempt at conceptualizing stress. Am. Psychol. 44, 513–524. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.44.3.513
Hobfoll, S. E. (2001). The influence of culture, community, and the nested-self in the stress process: Advancing conservation of resources theory. Appl. Psychol. 50, 337–421. doi: 10.1111/1464-0597.00062
Hobfoll, S. E. (2011). “Conservation of resources theory: Its implication for stress, health, and resilience,” in The Oxford Handbook of Stress, Health, and Coping, ed. S. Folkman (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 127–147.
Hobfoll, S. E., Halbesleben, J., Neveu, J.-P., and Westman, M. (2018). Conservation of resources in the organizational context: The reality of resources and their consequences. Annu. Rev. Organ. Psychol. Organ. Behav. 5, 103–128. doi: 10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-032117-104640
Hofstede, G. (2001). Culture’s Consequences: Comparing Values, Behaviors, Institutions and Organizations Across Nations, 2nd Edn. London: Sage Publications.
Hu, L., and Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Struct. Equat. Model. 6, 1–55. doi: 10.1080/10705519909540118
Jaafar, S. (2021). (PDF) The relationship between stress and job satisfaction. Int. J. Bus. Manage. 5, 8–12. doi: 10.26666/rmp.ijbm.2021.1.2
Kaur, P. (2020). Role stress and affective commitment: Mediator analysis of employee satisfaction. Vision 24, 471–480. doi: 10.1177/0972262920942673
Kaya, A. (2024). The association between transformational leadership and teachers’ creativity: Professional resilience and job satisfaction as mediators. Front. Psychol. 15:1514621. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1514621
Keskes, I., Sallan, J. M., Simo, P., and Fernandez, V. (2018). Transformational leadership and organizational commitment: Mediating role of leader-member exchange. J. Manage. Dev. 37, 32–47. doi: 10.1108/JMD-04-2017-0132
Khan, H., Rehmat, M., Butt, T. H., Farooqi, S., and Asim, J. (2020). Impact of transformational leadership on work performance, burnout and social loafing: A mediation model. Fut. Bus. J. 6:40. doi: 10.1186/s43093-020-00043-8
Kılınç, A. Ç,Polatcan, M., Savaş, G., and Er, E. (2024). How transformational leadership influences teachers’ commitment and innovative practices: Understanding the moderating role of trust in principal. Educ. Manage. Admin. Leadersh. 52, 455–474. doi: 10.1177/17411432221082803
Klassen, R. M., and Chiu, M. M. (2011). The occupational commitment and intention to quit of practicing and pre-service teachers: Influence of self-efficacy, job stress, and teaching context. Contemp. Educ. Psychol. 36, 114–129. doi: 10.1016/j.cedpsych.2011.01.002
Kovjanic, S., Schuh, S. C., and Jonas, K. (2013). Transformational leadership and performance: An experimental investigation of the mediating effects of basic needs satisfaction and work engagement. J. Occup. Organ. Psychol. 86, 543–555. doi: 10.1111/joop.12022
Kyriacou, C. (2001). Teacher stress: Directions for future research. Educ. Rev. 53, 27–35. doi: 10.1080/00131910120033628
Lei, G., Hamid, D. A. H. A., and Mansor, A. D. A. N. (2024). The relationship between transformational leadership and teacher job satisfaction: Empirical evidence from China. Educ. Admin. 30:6. doi: 10.53555/kuey.v30i6.6391
Leithwood, K., and Jantzi, D. (2006). Transformational school leadership for large-scale reform: Effects on students, teachers, and their classroom practices. Sch. Eff. Sch. Improv. 17, 201–227. doi: 10.1080/09243450600565829
Leithwood, K., and Sun, J. (2012). The nature and effects of transformational school leadership: A meta-analytic review of unpublished research. Educ. Admin. Q. 48, 387–423. doi: 10.1177/0013161X11436268
Li, C., and Zhang, Y. (2005). The impact of role stressors on teachers’ physical and psychological health. Acta Psychol. Sin. 37, 803–811.
Li, Y. (2022). A review of empirical research on transformational school leadership in China (2010–2019). ECNU Rev. Educ. 5, 156–184. doi: 10.1177/2096531120942242
Lin, W., Yin, H., and Liu, Z. (2022). The roles of transformational leadership and growth mindset in teacher professional development: The mediation of teacher self-efficacy. Sustainability 14:11. doi: 10.3390/su14116489
Liu, P. (2013). A transformational school leadership model in Chinese urban upper secondary schools. Int. Stud. Educ. Adm. 41, 73–94.
Liu, P. (2018). Transformational leadership research in China (2005–2015). Chin. Educ. Soc. 51, 372–409. doi: 10.1080/10611932.2018.1510690
Liu, S., and Onwuegbuzie, A. J. (2012). Chinese teachers’ work stress and their turnover intention. Int. J. Educ. Res. 53, 160–170. doi: 10.1016/j.ijer.2012.03.006
Meyer, J. P., and Allen, N. J. (1991). A three-component conceptualization of organizational commitment. Hum. Resour. Manage. Rev. 1, 61–89. doi: 10.1016/1053-4822(91)90011-Z
Meyer, J. P., Allen, N. J., and Smith, C. A. (1993). Commitment to organizations and occupations: Extension and test of a three-component conceptualization. J. Appl. Psychol. 78, 538–551. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.78.4.538
Nguni, S., Sleegers, P., and Denessen, E. (2006). Transformational and transactional leadership effects on teachers’ job satisfaction, organizational commitment, and organizational citizenship behavior in primary schools: The Tanzanian case. Sch. Eff. Sch. Improv. 17, 145–177. doi: 10.1080/09243450600565746
Nordenmark, M. (2004). Multiple social roles and well-being: A longitudinal test of the role stress theory and the role expansion theory. Acta Sociol. 47, 115–126. doi: 10.1177/0001699304043823
Papastylianou, A., Kaila, M., and Polychronopoulos, M. (2009). Teachers’ burnout, depression, role ambiguity and conflict. Soc. Psychol. Educ. 12, 295–314. doi: 10.1007/s11218-008-9086-7
Peterson, M. F., Smith, P. B., Akande, A., Ayestaran, S., Bochner, S., Callan, V., et al. (1995). Role conflict, ambiguity, and overload: A 21-nation study. Acad. Manage. J. 38, 429–452. doi: 10.2307/256687
Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J.-Y., and Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. J. Appl. Psychol. 88, 879–903. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879
Polatcan, M., and Cansoy, R. (2019). Examining studies on the factors predicting teachers’ job satisfaction: A systematic review. Int. Online J. Educ. Teach. 6:1.
Qi, L., Chaudhary, N. I., Yao, K., Mirza, F., and Khalid, R. (2022). The moderating role of transformational leadership on the relationship between deviant workplace behaviors and employee turnover intentions in China. Front. Psychol. 13:1005055. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1005055
Rizzo, J. R., House, R. J., and Lirtzman, S. I. (1970). Role conflict and ambiguity in complex organizations. Admin. Sci. Q. 15:150. doi: 10.2307/2391486
Ross, J. A., and Gray, P. (2006). Transformational leadership and teacher commitment to organizational values: The mediating effects of collective teacher efficacy. Sch. Eff. Sch. Improv. 17, 179–199. doi: 10.1080/09243450600565795
Shao, H., Fu, H., Ge, Y., Jia, W., Li, Z., and Wang, J. (2022). Moderating effects of transformational leadership, affective commitment, job performance, and job insecurity. Front. Psychol. 13:847147. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.847147
Shu, R., and Liang, J. (2015). Unpacking the motivational process of ethical leadership: A self-concept perspective. Chin. J. Manage. 12, 1012–1020. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-884x.2015.07.010
Singh, M. M., Amiri, M., and Sabbarwal, S. (2019). Role of job stress on job satisfaction. Int. J. Manage. Stud. 6, 57–60. doi: 10.18843/ijms/v6i4/08
Tsang, K. K., Du, Y., and Teng, Y. (2022). Transformational leadership, teacher burnout, and psychological empowerment: A mediation analysis. Soc. Behav. Pers. 50:e11041. doi: 10.2224/sbp.11041
Wang, D., Huang, L., Huang, X., Deng, M., and Zhang, W. (2024). Enhancing inclusive teaching in China: Examining the effects of principal transformational leadership, teachers’ inclusive role identity, and efficacy. Behav. Sci. 14:175. doi: 10.3390/bs14030175
Washburn, N. S., Simonton, K. L., Richards, K. A. R., and Lee, Y. H. (2022). Examining role stress, emotional intelligence, emotional exhaustion, and affective commitment among secondary physical educators. J. Teach. Phys. Educ. 41, 669–679. doi: 10.1123/jtpe.2021-0102
Yong, P., and Peng, Y. (2025). Strategies for enhancing the scholarship of teaching and learning among primary and secondary school teachers: A grounded theory analysis. Front. Educ. 10:1542528. doi: 10.3389/feduc.2025.1542528
Yu, X., and Jang, G. (2024). A framework for transformational leadership to enhance teacher’s work performance. Front. Psychol. 15:1331597. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1331597
Zhan, Q., Wang, X., and Song, H. (2023). The relationship between principals’ instructional leadership and teacher retention in the undeveloped regions of central and western China: The chain-mediating role of role stress and affective commitment. Behav. Sci. 13:9. doi: 10.3390/bs13090738
Zhang, X., Guo, J., Ma, L., Xu, R., Wang, J., Yang, Y., et al. (2023). Teacher stress among public primary and secondary school teachers in Datong, a city of Shanxi Province, China: Association between teacher stress and standardized workload. Int. J. Occup. Med. Environ. Health 36, 161–176. doi: 10.13075/ijomeh.1896.01948
Keywords: transformational leadership, role stress, affective commitment, job satisfaction, primary and secondary school teachers
Citation: Yong P and Zhang J (2025) How transformational leadership reduces teachers’ role stress: dual mediation of affective commitment and job satisfaction. Front. Psychol. 16:1634303. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1634303
Received: 24 May 2025; Accepted: 14 July 2025;
Published: 07 August 2025.
Edited by:
Xiantong Yang, Beijing Normal University, ChinaReviewed by:
Suhaili Mohd Yusoff, Ministry of Education, MalaysiaZeqing Xu, East China Normal University, China
Copyright © 2025 Yong and Zhang. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Junhui Zhang, emhhbmdqdW5odWlAdG1tdS5lZHUuY24=