Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Psychol.

Sec. Educational Psychology

Volume 16 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1653606

This article is part of the Research TopicEducating the Educators in Digital STEM-Education - the Impact of Teacher Training and their Further EducationView all 5 articles

Enhancing Professional Development in Digital STEM Education: Cross-Disciplinary Success Factors and Barriers

Provisionally accepted
Mientje  LüsseMientje Lüsse1*Ronja  SowinskiRonja Sowinski2Larissa-Marie  StamerLarissa-Marie Stamer2Simone  AbelsSimone Abels2Maja  BrückmannMaja Brückmann1
  • 1University of Oldenburg, Oldenburg, Germany
  • 2Leuphana Universitat Luneburg, Lüneburg, Germany

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

The increasing integration of digital tools into teaching presents opportunities to enhance interactivity, flexibility, and student-centeredness for science education. However, for these opportunities to be fully realized, teachers need to develop the necessary competencies and positive beliefs to effectively incorporate digital media into their pedagogical practices. Therefore, offering high-quality professional development (PD) is essential. Such programs provide teachers with hands-on training, strengthen their self-efficacy, and support student-centered teaching strategies, including the reflective use of digital media. Our ministry-funded project LFB-Labs-digital has developed empirically based PD programs in student labs across different subjects. For this context, a design-based research (DBR) approach was conducted within an interdisciplinary quality management (QM) to aim at analysing specific success factors and barriers of these PD programs. Hereby, we collect data from regular web-based discussions and short follow-up interviews with PD facilitators about their PD programs as well as incorporated observations. The evaluation framework was aligned with established criteria for effective PD, allowing for a systematic analysis of key success factors and necessary modifications. Our findings highlight several key factors for the success of PD programs in student labs. Identified success factors including technical support, curricular alignment, flexible formats, hands-on orientation, peer support and structured reflection opportunities that help teachers critically evaluate and adapt digital strategies to their teaching practice. These factors must be balanced against persistent barriers such as technical and organizational barriers as well as teachers’ heterogeneous digital competencies. Facilitators emphasize the need for PD programs that address diverse teacher needs while maintaining coherence in content delivery. By integrating multiple perspectives – facilitators, and systematic observations – this study contributes to a deeper understanding of how student labs can function as effective PD environments and provides concrete insights for scaling up and optimizing digital competency acquisition across subjects.

Keywords: digitalization, science education, ICT skills, out-of-school student labs, digitalmedia education, In-service teacher education

Received: 25 Jun 2025; Accepted: 23 Sep 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Lüsse, Sowinski, Stamer, Abels and Brückmann. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Mientje Lüsse, mientje.luesse@uol.de

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.