Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Psychol.

Sec. Educational Psychology

Volume 16 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1656795

This article is part of the Research TopicEducating the Educators in Digital STEM-Education - the Impact of Teacher Training and their Further EducationView all 4 articles

The development of Pre-Service Biology Teachers' Intention to Use Digital Incremental Scaffolds: Insights from Guided Online Training

Provisionally accepted
  • 1Bielefeld University, Bielefeld, Germany
  • 2University of Education Ludwigsburg, Ludwigsburg, Germany
  • 3University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
  • 4University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Background: In an increasingly digital educational landscape, it is essential that teachers not only possess subject-specific knowledge but also be are also able to integrate digital tools effectively in their teaching. This study investigates the impact of an asynchronous digital teacher training course on pre-service biology teachers' behavioral intentions regarding the implementation of digital incremental scaffolds. Based on the Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB) and the Technological Pedagogical and Content Knowledge (TPACK) framework, this study explores psychological and pedagogical factors that predict such behavioral changes. Methods: As an intervention, an iMooX-hosted training comprised eight modules, divided into an introductory unit, a basic module and three advanced modules to support the development and implementation of digital incremental scaffolds in biology lessons. A total of 100 German pre-service biology teachers (M = 23.4 years, SD = 3.5, 86 % female) participated in this quasi-experimental pre-post intervention study as part of their university curriculum., where Tthey completed standardized self-reporting questionnaires before and after engaging in the three-hour asynchronous digital teacher training course. The test instruments assessed constructs from the TPB and TPACK frameworks. Paired t-tests and structural equation modeling were used for data analysis. Results: There were significant increases across all sub-dimensions of the TPB, with the highest effective sizes in attitude (d = -0.83) and self-efficacy (d = -1.15); as well as behavioral intention itself (d = -0.73) and TPACK (d = -0.62). A regression analysis showed that attitude (β = 0.60, p < .001) and subjective norm (β = 0.22, p < .01) significantly predicted behavioral intention, while TPACK (β = 0.37, p < .001) and attitude (β = 0.49, p < .001) significantly predicted self-efficacy. Conclusion: These findings support the relevance of internal beliefs and social expectations in driving pre-service teachers' intention to integrate digital tools. The results also emphasize the importance of pedagogical-technological knowledge in shaping teachers' confidence in implementing such digital tools. The study's implications for designing practical informed digital training formats in teacher education are discussed.

Keywords: Behavioral Intention, pre-service teachers, Professional Development, teacher training, TPACK, scaffolds

Received: 30 Jun 2025; Accepted: 16 Sep 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Offermann, Karbstein, Lohrsträter, Großmann, Großschedl, Gussen, Kleinert, Schaal, Schaldach and Wilde. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence:
Margit Offermann, margit.offermann@uni-bielefeld.de
Matthias Wilde, matthias.wilde@uni-bielefeld.de

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.