Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Psychol.

Sec. Sport Psychology

Volume 16 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1657506

This article is part of the Research TopicTowards a Psychophysiological Approach in Physical Activity, Exercise, and Sports-Volume VView all 20 articles

Psychological and technological predictors of physical activity intention-behavior gap: an explainable machine learning analysis

Provisionally accepted
  • School of Physical Education, Hunan University of Science and Technology, Xiangtan, China

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Objective: Intention is widely regarded as the most proximal predictor of behaviour. But, physical activity (PA) intentions do not invariably translate into actual exercise behaviour, leaving a intention-behaviour (I-B) gap. The study integrates psychological and technological frameworks to examine the mechanisms that moderate the PA I-B gap. Methods: Unlike traditional dichotomous measures of the PA I-B gap, this study employs baseline correction to derive a standardized continuous measure that quantifies the magnitude of the gap. Using survey data from 1,334 Chinese adults, we combined the Health Belief Model and the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology within an explainable machine-learning framework to identify important predictors and their non-linear interactions. Results: The machine learning based optimal XGBoost model (R2=0.647) significantly outperforms traditional regression approaches. Perceived barriers, self efficacy, intention to use smart tools and social support emerge as the four core predictors of the PA I-B gap. Higher levels of perceived barriers and late night frequency enlarge the gap whereas greater self efficacy, perceived exercise benefits, intention to use smart tools, social support, social influence and personal innovation narrow it. The psychological cognition dimension exhibits significantly stronger predictive power than smart sports tools. These tools function primarily as auxiliary resources, and their facilitative effects differ across distinct psychological cognition levels. Conclusion: Psychological cognition and smart sports tools jointly predict the PA I-B gap. The study’s conclusions are constrained by its reliance on self-reported measures and its cross-sectional design. Future research should adopt longitudinal or experimental protocols, supplemented by objective data from wearable devices, to delineate causal pathways and illuminate the finer mechanisms underlying the gap.

Keywords: physical activity, intention-behavior gap, Double machine learning, SHAP explainable method, HealthBelief Model, Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology

Received: 01 Jul 2025; Accepted: 15 Sep 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 李 and 蔡. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: 建光 蔡, 1252339263@qq.com

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.