EDITORIAL article
Front. Psychol.
Sec. Educational Psychology
Volume 16 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1697199
This article is part of the Research TopicCross-sectoral Collaboration in Inclusive EducationView all 13 articles
Editorial on the Research Topic: Cross-Sectoral Collaboration in Inclusive Education
Provisionally accepted- 1Department of Education, Languages, and Instructional Design, SUNY Brockport, Brockport, NY, United States
- 2São Paulo State University, Bauru, Brazil
- 3Universidade de Sao Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
- 4Universidad de Alcala, Alcala de Henares, Spain
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Editorial on the Research Topic: Cross-Sectoral Collaboration in Inclusive Education Research demonstrates that intersectoral collaboration transforms educational practices, fostering inclusive cultures, strengthening community partnerships, and advancing institutional sustainability (Maier & Niebuhr, 2021; Kania et al., 2021). The United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO) reports that educational outcomes are strongly correlated with factors such as physical and mental health and socioeconomic status (2020), emphasizing the need for integrated services through cross-sectoral collaboration to address the diverse needs of all learners (UNESCO, 2020). This special research topic, "Cross-sectoral collaboration in inclusive education," edited by Capellini, Zhang, Lamônica, Muñoz-Martinez, and Rocha for Frontiers in Psychology, expands the existing literature by providing theoretical and practical studies on how intersectoral partnerships can effectively address learners' diverse needs while fostering inclusive educational environments worldwide. Multi-Professional Collaboration and Support Systems This collection directly responds to UNESCO's (2020) call for collaboration across sectors, investigating how integrated service delivery can enhance service quality and optimize cost-efficiency in meeting diverse learners' needs. It also examines the mechanisms of how interprofessional partnerships can advance inclusive education. Christensen's study of Norwegian kindergarten teachers recognizes education's crucial role in mental health and psychosocial support through establishing routines, building relationships, and creating safe learning environments. Their work challenges traditional intervention models and positions education as an essential component within comprehensive, community-collaborative support systems. Vidal et al.'s conceptual analysis demonstrates how systematic collaboration across education, health, and policy sectors in Chile fosters inclusive cultures for students with disabilities, indigenous populations, and socioeconomically disadvantaged groups. Their model proposes actionable guidelines that overcome structural barriers and integrate inclusive practices in schools, addressing diverse student needs through coordinated sectoral support. Tokheim et al. examine how Norwegian alternative educational programs re-engage students aged 9–16 who are at risk of school dropout by empowering them to make informed decisions about their learning and well-being. Their research demonstrates how alternative programs enhance students' self-esteem and autonomy through prioritizing student agency and providing individualized support. Chahboun et al. investigate how Norwegian schools identify and support students with developmental language disorders through accessible tools, targeted initiatives, and balanced pedagogical practices. Their study emphasizes the importance of interprofessional collaboration among all professionals to create well-structured, inclusive environments that promote academic success and social integration for students with language disorders. Aligning with UNESCO's (2020) broad definition of inclusion, this collection addresses multicultural education and sign language inclusion. The papers demonstrate how different pedagogical approaches can effectively serve diverse learner populations in various cultural contexts. Kalogerogianni demonstrates how intercultural pedagogy encourages dialogue between cultures to overcome monocultural paradigms, build democratic global citizenship, and foster respect for cultural diversity in multicultural classrooms. The study advocates for integrating intercultural objectives, methodologies, and digital tools across curricula to enhance language acquisition while preparing students to participate in contemporary multicultural societies. Acosta and Navarro analyze Chilean Sign Language translations by two Deaf co-teachers, revealing the sophisticated pedagogical strategies educators adapt to preserve and transmit cultural knowledge while ensuring accessibility for Deaf students. The investigation demonstrates how Deaf students are involved as active agents in the translation process, incorporating linguistic and cultural aspects of the Deaf community. Meaningful Participation of Stakeholders: Perspectives from Students, Professionals, and Following UNESCO (2020)'s call for dialogue, openness, and participation, this collection incorporates perspectives from professionals, students, and families, ensuring those affected by inclusive education policies and practices have a voice. The diverse national contexts represented—Brazil, China, Chile, and Norway—reflect UNESCO (2020)'s recognition that inclusive education must adapt to local circumstances while maintaining universal principles. Capellini et al.'s study, "Students' perception of the strengths and weaknesses of the inclusive educational model of Brazilian municipal public schools," investigates how 6-and 7-year-old children perceive inclusive education in municipal schools. Results indicate that children identify infrastructural and urban barriers as weaknesses, while recognizing difference-embracing practices and positive relationships as strengths that foster inclusivity. The study reinforces the importance of promoting inclusion from the earliest school years by respecting differences and embracing inclusivity. Another study led by Capellini, "Positive and negative aspects of remote learning during the COVID-19 pandemic in the view of Brazilian university students who received university assistance", examines how Brazilian undergraduate students perceived remote learning, focusing on institutional support systems and technological adaptations for educational continuity. This research provides evidence on how support mechanisms enhance student retention and promote inclusive access to higher education during times of crisis. Huang investigates the impact of empathy and teacher efficacy on the relationship between mindfulness and inclusive attitudes among elementary school teachers. The work highlights the importance of preparing educators for cross-sectoral collaboration, provides theoretical foundations to understand psychological mechanisms, and offers practical guidance for schools to implement mindfulness-based interventions for educators. Tebar-Yébana et al. conducted a bibliometric analysis of 77 papers across 39 nations, revealing growing recognition of parental perspectives on raising children with intellectual disabilities within inclusive education frameworks. Their study suggests that family satisfaction is linked to the success of educational inclusion. It demonstrates how diverse community contexts significantly shape the implementation and effectiveness of inclusive educational practices globally. Future Directions, Challenges, and Conclusion This Special Topic presents research evidence that cross-sectoral collaboration is fundamental to cultivating inclusive learning environments. While studies demonstrate potential for collaboration among education, health, social services, and policy sectors, they also illustrate the complexity of intersectoral partnership in advancing inclusive education internationally. The collection reveals structural barriers and systemic inequities that often impede effective collaboration. Future research must develop sustainable inter-agency cooperation models and address systemic inequities faced by students from marginalized communities across cultures, languages, and socioeconomics in various geographic contexts.
Keywords: Inclusive education, Cross-sectoral collaboration, Educational Policy, mental health support, educators, teacher preparation, family engagement
Received: 02 Sep 2025; Accepted: 19 Sep 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Zhang, Capellini, Rocha, Lamônica and Muñoz-Martinez. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Jie Zhang, jzhang@brockport.edu
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.