BRIEF RESEARCH REPORT article
Front. Psychol.
Sec. Personality and Social Psychology
The Relationship Between College Students' Legal Cognition and Maladaptive Risk-taking Behaviors: The Moderating Effect of Need for Cognitive Closure
Provisionally accepted
- 1Wenzhou University, Wenzhou, China
- 2Northwest University, Xi'an, China
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Legal socialization refers to the developmental process through which individuals form beliefs, values, and attitudes toward the law. A key component of this process is legal cognition, which includes concrete legal cognition and abstract legal cognition . While prior research links legal cognition to reduced antisocial behavior, its role in maladaptive risk-taking remains unclear. Additionally, how the two dimensions of Need for Cognitive Closure (NFC)—need for structure and decisiveness—moderate these effects is not well understood. In this study, 396 college students completed measures of legal cognition, maladaptive risk-taking, and NFC. Results showed that both concrete and abstract legal cognition negatively predicted maladaptive risk-taking. Need for structure strengthened these negative associations, while decisiveness weakened the link between concrete legal cognition and risk-taking but had no significant effect on abstract legal cognition. These findings suggest that the two types of legal cognition play distinct protective roles, and that the two dimensions of NFC differently shape how legal beliefs influence risk-taking behavior,providing guidance for teachers and school administrators in designing interventions to reduce maladaptive risk-taking among students.
Keywords: Legal Cognition, Concrete legal cognition, abstract legal cognition, Needfor cognitive closure, Need for structure, Decisiveness
Received: 02 Oct 2025; Accepted: 10 Nov 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Yu, Ding, Liu and Xu. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence:
Hui Liu, liuhui409@126.com
Shuhui Xu, miaowang90@wzu.edu.cn
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.