BRIEF RESEARCH REPORT article
Front. Psychol.
Sec. Educational Psychology
Understanding of Ironic and Literal Utterances in 4-9-year-old Typically Developing Children: Role of Age, Narrative Skills, Emotion Comprehension and Executive Functions
Provisionally accepted- 1Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, Russia
- 2University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Language comprehension is essential to communication, yet understanding varies between literal meaning and verbal irony. While children grasp words' surface meanings, interpreting verbal irony requires them to consider context and infer the speaker's true intent, revealing a deeper layer of meaning. What factors contribute to this complex skill? The current study examined the impact of sex, narrative skills, executive functions (working memory and inhibitory control), theory of mind and emotion comprehension, while controlling for age, on understanding of literal statements and verbal irony in 267 typically developing 4-9-year old children (130 boys). To assess children’s irony comprehension, we presented them with cartoon scenarios and asked to choose an emoji to indicate whether a parent’s reaction was literal or ironic. A full-null model approach was used to examine the impact of children's cognitive, executive, emotional, and narrative skills on their irony understanding, where the full contained our factors of interest and the null contained only age and sex. The results indicated that age was the only factor related to literal meaning comprehension. In contrast, both age and working memory were significantly related to irony understanding. These findings can be used as a foundation for developing training to enhance non-literal language and pragmatic skills in children.
Keywords: executive functions, irony, irony understanding, pragmatic development, preschool age, test of emotion comprehension
Received: 03 Oct 2025; Accepted: 02 Dec 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Oshchepkova, Kartushina and Kovyazina. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Ekaterina Oshchepkova
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
