ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Psychol.
Sec. Forensic and Legal Psychology
False Memories and Biased Judgements of Physical Touch: The Role of the Misinformation Effect on Eyewitness' Reports
Fabiana Battista 1
Tiziana Lanciano 1
Pasquale Zappimpulso 1
Federico Puleo 2
Ivan Mangiulli 2
Antonietta Curci 2
1. University of Bari Aldo Moro, Bari, Italy
2. Universita degli Studi di Bari Aldo Moro, Bari, Italy
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Abstract
Memory is a reconstructive process susceptible to external influences. The misinformation effect, extensively studied in eyewitness testimony, refers to the distortion of post-event information upon memory recall. However, limited research has examined how misinformation influences memory along with evaluation of an event involving physical touch. Participants of the present study (N = 184) watched a video depicting a professor-student interaction including a physical touch (male professor/female student vs. female professor/male student), followed by a free and cued recall, and evaluative ratings. After one day, participants received either neutral or misleading post-event information (i.e., the professor working on teaching materials vs. the professor being under investigation for sexual harassment of students) and completed a second recall and rating session. Measures of interrogative suggestibility, working memory, and executive functioning were also assessed. Results showed that misinformation significantly increased memory errors and influenced evaluative judgments over time, particularly in the male professor/female student condition. Participants exposed to misinformation judged the professor's behavior as more inappropriate and severe, and recommended a harsher punishment. A high level of individual's suggestibility was associated with lower perceived intentionality, independent of exposure to misinformation. These findings support the effect of misinformation on memory and judgments, highlighting critical implications for legal contexts. Keywords: Misinformation, False Memories, Correct Memories, Interrogative Suggestibility, Touch
Summary
Keywords
misinformation, false memories, correct memories, Interrogative suggestibility, Touch
Received
14 October 2025
Accepted
03 December 2025
Copyright
© 2025 Battista, Lanciano, Zappimpulso, Puleo, Mangiulli and Curci. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Fabiana Battista
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.