Abstract
Sleep disorders are common in autistic children and adolescents. However, the associations between children’s age and clinical features remain underexplored. This study investigates age-specific relationships between sleep difficulties and autism symptomatology, behavioral/emotional problems, cognitive development, and parenting stress. A total of 218 autistic participants were divided into three age groups: 6–36 months, 3–6 years, and 6–18 years. Sleep was assessed using the Sleep Disturbance Scale for Children (SDSC); behavioral and emotional difficulties were measured using the Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL); autism severity was assessed using the Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule – Second Edition (ADOS2), cognitive development was assessed using the Intelligence Quotient (IQ)/Developmental Quotient (DQ) scores, and parenting stress was assessed using the Parenting Stress Index (PSI). Results demonstrate age-specific variations in the relationship between sleep disturbances and clinical features in autistic children. In the 6–36 months group, sleep difficulties were influenced by autism severity, cognitive level, and emotional-behavioral factors. In the 3–6-year-old group, behavioral and emotional regulation issues were associated with sleep problems. In children aged 6–18 years, autism severity, adaptive functioning, and parenting stress emerged as key factors contributing to sleep disturbances. These findings underscore the dynamic and evolving nature of sleep problems in autism, highlighting the need for age-tailored interventions.
1 Introduction
Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) is a neurodevelopmental condition characterized by impairments in social communication and by repetitive or restricted patterns of behavior or interests (), with symptoms differing among individuals across a range of severity (Lord et al., 2018; Masi et al., 2017). Core symptoms include difficulties initiating and sustaining social interactions, difficulties understanding social cues, and repetitive or stereotyped behaviors. Non-verbal communication is often impaired, with reduced eye contact, gestures, and facial expressions. Additionally, delays in language development and repetitive speech patterns are commonly observed (Singhi and Malhi, 2023; ).
Autism spectrum disorder is one of the most common neurodevelopmental disorders, with a prevalence that has increased over the last few decades due to improved awareness, early identification, and advances in diagnostic practices (; Zeidan et al., 2022; Maenner et al., 2023). Epidemiological research shows that approximately 1 in 36 children are diagnosed with ASD, with boys being more frequently affected than girls. Discrepancies in prevalence are influenced by factors such as study methodologies, biological factors, and social determinants, including socioeconomic status (SES), geography, and ethnicity (Zeidan et al., 2022; Maenner et al., 2023).
Children with ASD often experience co-occurring psychiatric and behavioral challenges. Research suggests that approximately 70% of autistic children have at least one comorbid psychiatric disorder, while nearly 40% may have two or more comorbid psychiatric disorder (; ; ; Hossain et al., 2020). Common comorbidities include anxiety, depression, attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder, and intellectual disability, which can further influence social functioning, adaptive behavior, and overall quality of life (; Hossain et al., 2020; ).
Sleep disorders represent one of the most frequent comorbidities in ASD, affecting approximately 80% of children (; ; ; Mazzone et al., 2018; ; ; Lai et al., 2019). The most frequent sleep disorder in autistic children is insomnia, which is characterized by difficulty falling asleep, frequent nighttime awakenings, and resistance to going to bed (). Other sleep disorders, such as parasomnias and excessive daytime sleepiness, have been linked to behavioral challenges and the severity of ASD in several studies (; Tudor et al., 2012; ; Mazurek and Sohl, 2016; ; ; ).
Sleep cycles undergo significant changes from early childhood through adolescence, reflecting maturation of neural circuits and circadian regulation. In early life, sleep is initially polyphasic, with short cycles and a high proportion of rapid eye movement (REM) sleep, which gradually differentiates into distinct REM and non-REM stages. Over the first years, sleep consolidates into a predominantly nocturnal, monophasic pattern. Across childhood and adolescence, total sleep duration gradually declines, slow-wave sleep (SWS) decreases, and lighter non-rapid eye movement (NREM) stages become more prominent. In contrast, nocturnal sleep becomes increasingly consolidated and structured. These normative developmental patterns are also evident in objective measures, such as age-related decreases in the proportion of REM sleep, increased sleep consolidation, and shifts in electroencephalogram (EEG) spectral power between NREM and REM sleep, consistent with ongoing synaptic pruning and cortical maturation (; McLaughlin Crabtree and Williams, 2009; Lenehan et al., 2023). During early childhood, REM sleep declines while NREM sleep becomes more differentiated, with slow-wave sleep (SWS) emerging and gradually decreasing over time (Lenehan et al., 2023).
Polysomnographic studies suggest that autistic children frequently exhibit altered sleep architecture, including changes in REM and slow-wave sleep, reduced sleep efficiency, and increased nighttime fragmentation. These sleep patterns have been linked to behavioral profiles and the severity of core ASD symptoms. Meta-analytic evidence indicates that autistic children show differences in sleep stage distribution and efficiency relative to typical development, although these alterations vary by age, symptom severity, and individual clinical features (; Kawai et al., 2023; Nguyen et al., 2022).
Since sleep plays a crucial role in regulating behavior and emotions, disrupted or insufficient sleep may have cascading effects across multiple domains, including the exacerbation of core symptoms of ASD, impairments in adaptive functioning, behavioral regulation, and cognitive processes (; Xavier, 2021). As a matter of fact, a growing body of evidence suggests a bidirectional link between sleep disorders and behavioral/emotional difficulties: in other words, behavioral issues can either intensify or be intensified by sleep disorders, leading to several difficulties, such as anxiety and behavioral and emotional symptoms (; ; Taylor et al., 2012). In line with this perspective, Mazurek and Sohl found that specific types of sleep disorders in autistic children, such as night awakenings, were associated with increased levels of physical aggression, irritability, inattention, and hyperactivity (Mazurek and Sohl, 2016), leading to increased levels of parenting stress, as reported in other studies (; Johnson et al., 2018).
Within this framework, sleep disturbances in ASD are commonly conceptualized as clinical outcomes influenced by multiple child-related characteristics, autistic symptom severity (ADOS), behavioral and emotional difficulties, cognitive functioning, and adaptive skills. Previous studies have consistently reported associations between these domains and increased sleep difficulties across development (Mazurek and Sohl, 2016; ; Sikora et al., 2012; ; Meltzer and Mindell, 2008; Mignolli et al., 2022). Although bidirectional associations have been described, most studies have relied on large, mixed-age samples, often overlooking age-specific patterns, despite evidence that different neurobiological, emotional, and contextual needs characterize distinct developmental stages. Therefore, the present study adopted an age-stratified approach to investigate sleep disturbances across developmental stages in autistic children.
Specifically, the aims were to: (i) examine the prevalence and profile of sleep disturbances across age groups; (ii) explore age-specific associations between sleep disorders and clinical features, including ASD severity, cognitive functioning, adaptive behavior, emotional–behavioral problems, and parenting stress; and (iii) evaluate the relative contribution of neurodevelopmental and psychosocial factors to sleep outcomes within each age group.
2 Materials and methods
2.1 Participants
A total of 218 children and adolescents were included in the present study. The participants were assessed through neuropsychological and clinical evaluations at the Child and Adolescent Neuropsychiatry Unit of Bambino Gesù Children’s Hospital in Rome between January 2022 and March 2023. Participants were selected from children diagnosed with ASD according to the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders – Fifth Edition, Text Revision (DSM-5 TR) criteria. Diagnoses were established by a multidisciplinary team comprising child psychiatrists and research psychologists with clinical training. Only those who completed the full assessment process were included in the final sample.
Exclusion criteria included neurological conditions such as epilepsy, encephalitis, brain tumors, and cerebrovascular disorders, as well as language barriers that hindered parental completion of the required questionnaires. The sample included all participants who had not assumed psychoactive or sleep-influencing medications at the time of the evaluation.
For the analysis, the sample was divided into three subgroups based on the version of the Sleep Disturbance Scale for Children (SDSC) questionnaire (; ; Romeo et al., 2021)—56 infants and toddlers aged 6–36 months (44 boys and 12 girls), 106 children aged 3–6 years (87 boys and 19 girls), and 55 children aged 6–18 years (45 boys and 10 girls). The study’s purpose was thoroughly explained to all caregivers, and informed consent was obtained. This study adhered to the principles outlined in the Declaration of Helsinki and received approval from the local Ethics Committee (protocol code: 2423_OPBG_2021; approved on 27 October 2021).
2.2 Measures
A comprehensive, multidisciplinary assessment was conducted using a blend of clinician-administered standardized instruments and parent-reported questionnaires. Cognitive functioning (Leiter−3, Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children – Fourth Edition [WISC-IV], and Griffiths-III) and autistic symptom severity (Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule – Second Edition [ADOS2]) were directly assessed by trained clinicians using standardized instruments. Parent-reported instruments were used to evaluate adaptive behavior (Adaptive Behavior Assessment System II [ABAS-II]), behavioral and emotional problems (Child Behavior Checklist [CBCL]), sleep disorders (SDSC questionnaires), and parenting stress (Parenting Stress Index [PSI]). All data were collected within a multidisciplinary clinical framework, integrating information from medical history, direct observation, standardized clinical assessments, caregiver interviews, and clinical consultations, with questionnaires used as a complementary source of information. This multimethod approach allowed integration of objective, clinician-observed measures with caregiver-reported information, providing a comprehensive characterization of the child’s developmental, behavioral, and clinical profile.
2.2.1 Cognitive assessment
Cognitive development was assessed using standardized, age-appropriate instruments (Koch et al., 2013). The Leiter-3 provides a non-verbal measure of intelligence obtained through four subtests: Figure/Ground, Form Completion, Classification and Analogies, and Sequential Order, and can be administered from 3 to 75 years of age (Koch et al., 2013). For children younger than 2 years of age or those unable to complete the Leiter-3 due to limited attention span, developmental functioning was assessed using the Griffiths Mental Development Scales – Extended Revised (GMDS-ER) (Griffiths et al., 2006) or the third edition of the Griffiths Scales of Child Development (Griffiths III), both administered from birth to 6 years (Green et al., 2016). The GMDS-ER provides a measure of development in children aged 0–2 years in five different domains (Locomotor, Personal–Social, Language, Eye and Hand Coordination, and Performance). The mean of the six subscale quotients yields the Global Developmental Quotient. The Griffiths III provides a measure of children’s development in five domains: Foundations of Learning, Language and Communication, Eye and Hand Coordination, Personal–Social–Emotional, and Gross Motor. The average of the five quotients yields the subscales, which provide a Global Developmental Quotient (DQ).
The Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children – Fourth Edition (WISC-IV), standardized for children aged 6 to 16 years (Wechsler, 2012), was administered to all participants without language impairments, such as non-verbal or minimally verbal children with significant difficulties in comprehension or production. Minimally verbal children with ASD are typically defined as those who do not develop functional spoken language and remain with limited expressive vocabulary beyond the age of 5 (Guerrera et al., 2025). The instrument comprises 10 core subtests: Block Design, Similarities, Digit Span, Picture Concepts, Coding, Vocabulary, Letter–Number Sequencing, Matrix Reasoning, Comprehension, and Symbol Search. WISC-IV administration provides four different indexes: Verbal Comprehension Index, Perceptual Reasoning Index, Working Memory Index, and Processing Speed Index.
For the analyses, non-verbal IQ (Leiter-3), Full-Scale IQ (WISC-IV), and Developmental Quotient (Griffiths III/GMDS-ER) were used as indices of general cognitive functioning.
2.2.2 Autistic symptoms assessment
The clinical diagnosis of ASD was confirmed using a widely recognized “gold standard” tool, the Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule – Second Edition (ADOS2) (Lord et al., 2013).
The ADOS2 is a semi-structured assessment tool designed for a systematic and standardized evaluation of ASD symptoms. The instrument consists of five modules: the Toddler Module, for children aged 12–30 months who do not yet use phrases; Module 1, for children aged 31 months and older who are non-verbal; Module 2, for children with limited verbal communication; Module 3, for children and young adolescents who speak fluently; and Module 4, for older adolescents and adults who also have fluent speech. The assessment was conducted and scored by ADOS examiners who have been trained to maintain research reliability.
ADOS2 calibrated severity scores (ADOS2 CSS) were also analyzed (). ADOS2 Restricted and Repetitive Behavior Calibrated Severity Score (ADOS2-RRB CSS), ADOS2 Social Affect Calibrated Severity Score (ADOS2-SA CSS), and ADOS2 Calibrated Severity Score based on raw total scores (ADOS2 CSS TOT) were included in the analyses. A strong test–retest reliability of the ADOS-2 CSS across all ADOS Modules was reported (Janvier et al., 2022).
2.2.3 Adaptive behavior assessment
To evaluate adaptive behaviors, the Adaptive Behavior Assessment System II (ABAS-II) (Harrison and Oakland, 2003). In the present study, we considered the General Adaptive Composite score, Social Adaptive Composite Score, Conceptual Adaptive Composite score, and Practical Adaptive Composite score of ABAS-II for the analyses. The conceptual domain encompasses abilities related to communication and functional academic performance. The social domain encompasses skills required for engaging in interpersonal interactions, initiating and sustaining relationships, and effectively interpreting social information. The practical domain involves proficiency in activities of daily living and the management of household responsibilities (Harrison and Oakland, 2003).
2.2.4 Behavioral and psychological assessment
To explore the presence of co-occurring behavioral and emotional symptoms, we employed the Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL) for children aged 1.5–5 years () and 6–18 years (). The CBCL is recognized as a reliable instrument for identifying behavioral and emotional difficulties in children and adolescents, and it is frequently used in populations with neurodevelopmental disorders (; ). In autistic children, the instrument has been suggested for supporting the diagnosis (Pandolfi et al., 2014; Hanratty et al., 2015). Raw scores were transformed into T-scores. All T scores were included in the analysis.
2.2.5 Parenting stress assessment
Parenting stress was assessed using the Parenting Stress Index—Short Form (PSI-SF) (). This index includes three subscales: Parenting Distress (PD), Parent–Child Dysfunctional Interaction (P-CDI), and Difficult Child (DC). PD subscale measures the level of stress a parent experiences due to personal factors, such as feelings of incompetence or lack of social support. The P-CDI subscale evaluates the parent’s perception of their relationship with their child. The DC subscale assesses the parent’s perception of their child’s temperament and behavior ().
The PSI demonstrates strong test–retest reliability (0.96). By summing the item scores, a total PSI score can be calculated. All scores obtained in the main subscales were included in the analysis.
2.2.6 Sleep disorders assessment
To investigate the presence of sleep disorders, the Sleep Disturbance Scale for Children (SDSC) was assessed (; Romeo et al., 2021). The questionnaire is typically completed by caregivers and assesses key areas such as difficulties initiating and maintaining sleep, sleep-disordered breathing, arousal disorders, sleep–wake transition disorders, excessive daytime sleepiness, and excessive sweating during sleep (hyperhidrosis). The SDSC has demonstrated strong psychometric properties, with an internal consistency ranging from 0.71 to 0.79, a test–retest reliability of 0.71, and a high diagnostic accuracy of 0.91 ().
The SDSC questionnaire was administered according to participants’ age.
SDSC 6–36 months (Romeo et al., 2021) includes 19 items and the following subscales: Disorders of Initiating Sleep (DIS); Disorders of Maintaining Sleep (DMS); Sleep Breathing Disorders (SBD); Parasomnias (PARA); Disorders of Arousal and Sleep Wake Transition (DSWT); Disorders of Excessive Somnolence (DOES); Sleep Hyperhidrosis (SHY).
SDSC 3–6 years (Romeo et al., 2013) includes 26 items and the following 6 subscales: Disorders of Initiating and Maintaining Sleep (DIMS); Sleep Breathing Disorders (SBD); Parasomnias (PARA); Disorders of Excessive Somnolence (DOES); Sleep Hyperhidrosis (SHY); Nonrestorative Sleep (NRS).
SDSC 6–18 years () includes 26 items and 6 subscales representing the most common areas of sleep disorders in childhood and adolescence: Disorders of Initiating and Maintaining Sleep (DIMS); Sleep Breathing Disorders (SBD); Disorders of Arousal (DA) such as sleepwalking, sleep terrors, nightmares; Sleep–Wake Transition Disorders (SWTD) such as hypnic jerks, rhythmic movement disorders, hypnagogic hallucinations, nocturnal hyperkinesia, bruxism; Disorders of Excessive Somnolence (DOES); Sleep Hyperhidrosis (SHY).
The SDSC provides a T-score for each subscale and a total score (SDSC Total Score). A T-score of 60 or higher indicates a high or clinically significant score, indicating the presence of a sleep disorder.
2.3 Plan of analysis
All data were uploaded to SPSS version 27 for analysis (IBM Corp, 2020).
A multivariate model, including bootstrap resampling (1,000 samples; 95% confidence interval), was computed to evaluate the associations between clinical features and sleep variables across age groups as assessed by the SDSC questionnaire. Sleep variables derived from the SDSC were treated as dependent variables. At the same time, autism severity, cognitive functioning, adaptive behavior, behavioral/emotional problems, and parenting stress were entered as predictors, in line with a developmental framework conceptualizing sleep disturbances as clinical outcomes associated with neurodevelopmental and psychosocial features. Given the cross-sectional design, analyses were intended to examine theoretically driven associations rather than causal relationships.
In particular, the model for the 6–36-month age group evaluated the effect of adaptive functioning, autistic symptoms, cognitive functioning, and behavioral problems on the variables DIS, DMS, SBD, PARA, DOES, SHY, and TOT. The model related to the 3–6-year age group evaluated the effects of adaptive functioning, autistic symptoms, cognitive functioning, and behavioral problems on the variables PARA, DIMS, SBD, DOES, SHY, NRS, and TOT. The model for the 6–15-year age group evaluated the effects of the adaptive functioning, autistic symptoms, cognitive functioning, and behavioral problems on the DIMS, SBD, DA, DSWT, DOES, IPN, and TOT.
3 Results
3.1 Descriptive statistics
Descriptive statistics were used to summarize children’s performance across developmental, behavioral, and adaptive functioning domains. The data were systematically organized by age group: 6–36 months (Table 1), 3–6 years (Table 2), and 6–18 years (Table 3).
Table 1
| Variable | Mean | Standard error |
|---|---|---|
| SDSC-TOT | 51.09 | 1.17 |
| ADOS2-TOT | 15.49 | 0.34 |
| CBCL-TOT problems | 57.86 | 0.91 |
| ABAS-GAC composite | 61.63 | 1.25 |
| ABAS-DAC composite | 67.86 | 2.70 |
| ABAS-DAS composite | 67.18 | 1.11 |
| ABAS-DAP composite | 66.17 | 1.22 |
| IQ/DQ | 65.19 | 1.80 |
The 6–36 months descriptive statistics.
Table 2
| Variable | Mean | Standard error |
|---|---|---|
| SDSC-TOT | 51.54 | 1.12 |
| ADOS2-TOT | 15.49 | 0.34 |
| CBCL-TOT Problems | 57.86 | 0.91 |
| ABAS-GAC composite | 61.48 | 1.23 |
| ABAS-DAC composite | 67.69 | 2.65 |
| ABAS-DAS composite | 66.94 | 1.10 |
| ABAS-DAP composite | 66.05 | 1.21 |
| IQ/DQ | 65.19 | 1.80 |
The 3–6 years descriptive statistics.
Table 3
| Variable | Mean | Standard error |
|---|---|---|
| SDSC-TOT | 53.95 | 1.55 |
| ADOS2-TOT | 15.49 | 0.34 |
| Md_PSI_STRESS T | 81.79 | 1.68 |
| CBCL-TOT problems | 60.63 | 1.09 |
| ABAS-GAC composite | 61.52 | 1.23 |
| ABAS-DAC composite | 67.65 | 2.63 |
| ABAS-DAS composite | 66.88 | 1.10 |
| ABAS-DAP composite | 66.17 | 1.21 |
| IQ/DQ | 65.19 | 1.80 |
The 6–18 descriptive statistics.
For clarity, the following acronyms are used throughout the manuscript to refer to assessment instruments and outcome measures: Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule – Second Edition Social Affect (ADOS-SA) score, Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule – Second Edition Total (ADOS-TOT) score, Child Behavior Checklist Internalizing Problems (CBCL-INT) scale, Child Behavior Checklist Externalizing Problems (CBCL-EXT) scale, and Child Behavior Checklist Total Problems (CBCL-TOT) score. Cognitive functioning is typically assessed using an Intelligence Quotient (IQ). Sleep disturbances are assessed using the Sleep Disturbance Scale for Children Total score (SDSC-TOT), including Disorders of Initiating and Maintaining Sleep (DIMS), Disorders of Initiating Sleep (DIS), Disorders of Maintaining Sleep (DMS), Parasomnias (PARA), Sleep Breathing Disorders (SBD), Sleep–Wake Transition Disorders (SWTD), and Disorders of Excessive Somnolence (DOES). Parental stress is measured using the Parenting Stress Index Total score (PSI-TOT). Adaptive functioning is evaluated using the Adaptive Behavior Assessment System, Practical domain (ABAS-DAP) and the Adaptive Behavior Assessment System, Communication domain (ABAS-DAC).
The prevalence of sleep difficulties, defined as an SDSC total (SDSC-TOT) score >60, varied across age groups. In the 6–36 months group, 20% of participants showed clinically elevated SDSC total scores. In the 3–6-year-old group, clinically significant SDSC scores were observed in 16.5% of participants. The highest prevalence was found in the 6–18 years group, where 30% of children and adolescents exhibited SDSC total scores in the clinical range.
Pearson correlation analyses were conducted to examine the relationships between parenting stress and both parent-reported and clinician-administered child measures, to assess the degree of association among these constructs, and to evaluate potential shared-method variance when interpreting parent-reported outcomes. As shown in Table 4, parenting stress was primarily associated with parent-reported sleep disturbances and behavioral problems across age groups. In contrast, associations with clinician-administered measures of autism severity were weak or non-significant.
Table 4
| Age group | Measure | Type of measure | r (PSI) | p-value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6–36 months | SDSC-TOT | Parent-report | 0.12 | 0.37 |
| CBCL-TOT problems | Parent-report | 0.32* | 0.019 | |
| ABAS-GAC | Parent-report | 0.15 | 0.26 | |
| ADOS2-TOT | Clinician-administered | −0.25 | 0.065 | |
| 3–6 years | SDSC-TOT | Parent-report | 0.37** | <0.001 |
| CBCL-TOT Problems | Parent-report | 0.64** | <0.001 | |
| ABAS-GAC | Parent-report | −0.42** | <0.001 | |
| ADOS2-TOT | Clinician-administered | 0.23* | 0.030 | |
| ≥6 years | SDSC-TOT | Parent-report | 0.31* | 0.012 |
| CBCL-TOT Problems | Parent-report | 0.37** | 0.005 | |
| ABAS-GAC | Parent-report | −0.07 | 0.59 | |
| ADOS2-TOT | Clinician-administered | 0.08 | 0.54 |
Pearson correlations between parenting stress (PSI-total [PSI-TOT] score) and parent-reported and clinician-administered child measures across age groups.
*p < 0.05; **p < 0.01.
3.2 Multivariate analysis
3.2.1 6–36 months
Multivariate analysis shows that for the model associated with the 6–36 months of age group ADOS-SA (Λ = 0.804 with F = 1,081; p < 0.005), ADOS-TOT (Λ = 0.741 with F = 1,544; p < 0.005), CBCL-INT (Λ = 0.715 with F = 1,762; p < 0.005), CBCL-EXT (Λ = 0.837 with F = 0,862; p < 0.005), CBCL-TOT (Λ = 0.716 with F = 1,754; p < 0.005) and QI (Λ = 0.703 with F = 1,868; p < 0.005), have statistically significant effect in the model.
Specifically, univariate analyses indicate that higher ADOS-TOT scores are associated with higher DIS (β = 2,404, p < 0.05) scores, whereas higher ADOS-SA scores are associated with lower DOES (β = −4,934, p < 0.05) scores. Higher CBCL-INT scores are associated with lower DMS (β = −1.641, p < 0.05), PARA (β = −0,812, p < 0.05), and SDSC-TOT (β = −1,144, p < 0.05) scores.
Higher CBCL-EXT scores are associated with lower DMS (β = −0,871, p < 0.05); CBCL-TOT scores are associated with higher DMS (β = 2,363, p < 0.05), PARA (β = 1,371, p < 0.05), and SDSC-TOT (β = 1,911, p < 0.05) scores.
Finally, higher IQ levels are associated with higher PARA (β = 0,253, p < 0.05) and DOES (β = 0,385, p < 0.05) scores (Tables 5, 6).
Table 5
| / | DIS | DMS | SBD | PARA | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F | B (SE) | F | B (SE) | F | B (SE) | F | B (SE) | |
| Corrected model | 1.806 | / | 2.226 | / | 1.389 | / | 3.032 | / |
| Intercept | 2.289 | 31.525 (20.838) | 9.142 | 61.028 (20.184) | 7.322 | 56.026 (20.706) | 9.775 | 51.317 (16.413) |
| ADOS2-AS | 2.982 | –3.476 (2.013) | 0.282 | 1.036 (1.949) | 0.015 | 0.231 (2.000) | 0.155 | −0.624 (1.585) |
| ADOS2-RRB | 0.000 | –0.022 (1.549) | 1.462 | 1.814 (1.500) | 0.044 | −0.323 (1.539) | 0.565 | 0.917 (1.220) |
| ADOS2-TOT | 5.650 | 2.404* (1.012) | 0.170 | –0.404 (0.980) | 0.027 | –0.165 (1.005) | 0.715 | –0.674 (0.797) |
| PSI-TOT | 0.905 | 0.067 (.071) | 0.595 | –0.053 (0.069) | 0.277 | 0.037 (0.070) | 0.412 | –0.036 (0.056) |
| CBCL-INT | 1.959 | –0.688 (0.491) | 11.891 | −1.641** (0.476) | 3.056 | −0.854 (0.488) | 4.404 | −0.812* (0.387) |
| CBCL-EXT | 2.896 | −0.726 (0.427) | 4.437 | −0.871* (0.413) | 0.177 | −0.179 (0.424) | 2.482 | −0.530 (0.336) |
| CBCL-TOT | 3.415 | 1.296 (0.701) | 12.111 | 2.363** (0.679) | 2.086 | 1.006 (0.697) | 6.166 | 1.371* (0.552) |
| ABAS-GAC | 0.230 | −0.126 (0.263) | 0.277 | −0.134 (0.255) | 0.008 | 0.023 (0.262) | 0.103 | −0.067 (0.207) |
| ABAS-DAC | 0.519 | 0.146 (0.202) | 1.623 | 0.249 (0.196) | 0.946 | 0.195 (0.201) | 0.040 | −0.032 (0.159) |
| ABAS-DAS | 0.063 | −0.056 (0.224) | 0.346 | −0.128 (0.217) | 0.560 | −0.167 (0.233) | 0.018 | 0.024 (0.176) |
| ABAS-DAP | 0.560 | −0.45 (0.188) | 0.311 | −0.102 (0.182) | 1.183 | −0.203 (0.187) | 0.170 | −0.061 (0.148) |
| IQ/GDQ | 1.518 | 0.153 (0.124) | 0.027 | -0.20 (0.120) | 0.955 | 0.121 (0.124) | 6.657 | 0.253* (0.098) |
| R2 (adjusted) | 0.165 | 0.231 | 0.087 | 0.332 | ||||
Multivariate analysis 6–36 months.
*p < 0.05; **p < 0.01.
Table 6
| / | DOES | SHY | TOT | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F | B (SE) | F | B (SE) | F | B (SE) | |
| Corrected model | 2.129 | / | 0.502 | / | 2.331 | / |
| Intercept | 1.867 | 35.326 (25.854) | 4.417 | 65.414 (31.125) | 7.079 | 50.638 (19.032) |
| ADOS2-AS | 3.905* | −4.934* (2.497) | 0.031 | 0.526 (3.006) | 1.272 | –2.073 (1.838) |
| ADOS2-RRB | 0.009 | −0.187 (1.921) | 0.561 | –1.733 (2.313) | 0.007 | 0.120 (1.414) |
| ADOS2-TOT | 0.817 | 1.134 (1.255) | 0.016 | 0.190 (1.511) | 0.943 | 0.897 (0.924) |
| PSI-TOT | 0.357 | −0.052 (0.088) | 0.046 | −0.023 (0.106) | 0.325 | –0.037 (0.065) |
| CBCL-INT | 0.101 | 0.194 (0.610) | 0.729 | −0.627 (0.734) | 6.498 | –1.144 * (0.449) |
| CBCL-EXT | 0.807 | −0.476 (0.530) | 0.030 | −0.110 (0.638) | 3.212 | −0.699 (0.390) |
| CBCL-TOT | 0.811 | 0.783 (0.870) | 0.565 | 0.787 (1.047) | 8.906 | 1.911* (0.640) |
| ABAS-GAC | 0.001 | −0.011 (0.327) | 0.108 | 0.129 (0.393) | 0.112 | −0.081 (0.240) |
| ABAS-DAC | 0.224 | −0.119 (0.251) | 0.286 | 0.161 (0.302) | 1.322 | 0.212 (0.185) |
| ABAS-DAS | 0.683 | −0.230 (0.278) | 1.401 | −0.396 (0.335) | 2.038 | 0.212 (0.185) |
| ABAS-DAP | 0.198 | 0.104 (0.233) | 0.047 | −0.061 (0.281) | 0.063 | −0.292 (0.205) |
| IQ/GDQ | 6.226 | 0.385* (0.154) | 0.194 | 0.082 (0.186) | 3.182 | −0.043 (0.172) |
| R2 (adjusted) | 0.217 | 0.139 | 0.246 | 0.203 (0.114) | ||
Multivariate analysis 6–36 months.
*p < 0.05.
3.2.2 3–6 years
Multivariate analysis shows that for the model related to the 3–6-year-old group, only CBCL-TOT (Λ = 0.912 with F = 0,966; p < 0.05) has a statistically significant effect in the model. Specifically, univariate analyses indicate that higher CBCL-TOT scores are associated with higher SDSC-TOT scores (β = 0,634, p < 0.05) (Tables 7, 8).
Table 7
| / | PARA | DIMS | SBD | DOES | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F | B (SE) | F | B (SE) | F | B (SE) | F | B (SE) | |
| Corrected model | 2.422 | / | 2.702 | / | 0.580 | / | 0.789 | / |
| Intercept | 2.607 | 22.459 (13.909) | 3.133 | 30.460 (17.208) | 5.932 | 46.143 (18.945) | 2.557 | 117.551 (73.515) |
| ADOS2-AS | 0.719 | 0.889 (1.048) | 1.171 | 0.536 (1.297) | 0.038 | −0.278 (1.428) | 3.294 | 10.054 (5.540) |
| ADOS2-RRB | 0.462 | −0.636 (0.936) | 0.004 | −0.072 (1.159) | 0.177 | 0.537 (1.276) | 0.535 | 3.621 (4.950) |
| ADOS2-TOT | 0.010 | −0.045 (0.441) | 0.416 | −0.352 (0.545) | 0.300 | −0.329 (0.600) | 2.981 | -4.021 (2.329) |
| PSI-TOT | 1.349 | 0.060 (0.052) | 0.022 | 0.009 (0.064) | 0.472 | −0.049 (0.071) | 0.186 | −0.119 (0.275) |
| CBCL-INT | 0.014 | −0.15 (0.127) | 0.019 | –0.022 (0.157) | 0.029 | –0.030 (0.173) | 0.086 | –0.197 (0.671) |
| CBCL-EXT | 0.090 | –0.066 (0.220) | 0.059 | –0.066 (0.272) | 0.032 | 0.053 (0.299) | 0.234 | 0.562 (1.160) |
| CBCL-TOT | 2.415 | 0.377 (0.242) | 3.649 | 0.573 (0.300) | 0.242 | 0.162 (0.330) | 0.168 | –0.524 (1.281) |
| ABAS-GAC | 0.007 | –0.024 (0.282) | 0.001 | 0.012 (0.349) | 0.287 | 0.206 (0.384) | 0.843 | 1.369 (1.491) |
| ABAS-DAC | 0.011 | –0.015 (0.147) | 0.184 | –0.078 (0.182) | 2.793 | –0.335 (0.201) | 0.082 | –0.222 (0.779) |
| ABAS-DAS | 0.329 | –0.083 (0.145) | 0.492 | 0.126 (0.180) | 0.010 | 0.020 (0.198) | 1.286 | –0.871 (0.768) |
| ABAS-DAP | 0.011 | –0.015 (0.140) | 0.132 | –0.063 (0.173) | 0.007 | 0.016 (0.190) | 0.826 | –0.672 (0.739) |
| IQ/GDQ | 0.227 | 0.024 (0.050) | 0.064 | –0.016 (0.062) | 0.793 | 0.061 (0.068) | 3.359 | –0.485 (0.265) |
| R2 (adjusted) | 0.162 | 0.188 | –0.061 | –0.030 | ||||
Multivariate analysis 3–6 years.
Table 8
| / | SHY | NRS | TOT | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F | B (SE) | F | B (SE) | F | B (SE) | |
| Corrected model | 1.690 | / | 2.046 | / | 3.265 | / |
| Intercept | 3.525 | 31.479 (16.767) | 10.177 | 50.120 (15.711) | 3.394 | 29.167 (15.832) |
| ADOS2-AS | 0.029 | –0.214 (1.263) | 0.966 | 1.163 (1.184) | 0.414 | 0.767 (1.193) |
| ADOS2-RRB | 1.413 | 1.342 (1.129) | 3.309 | −1.924 (1.058) | 0.775 | −0.938 (1.066) |
| ADOS2-TOT | 0.694 | −0.442 (0.531) | 2.290 | −0.268 (0.498) | 0.172 | −0.208 (0.502) |
| PSI-TOT | 0.598 | 0.049 (0.063) | 0.570 | 0.044 (0.059) | 0.036 | 0.011 (0.059) |
| CBCL-INT | 0.023 | 0.023 (0.153) | 3.281 | −0.260 (0.143) | 0.598 | −0.112 (0.145) |
| CBCL-EXT | 0.160 | −0.106 (0.265) | 0.092 | −0.075 (0.248) | 0.133 | −0.091 (0.250) |
| CBCL-TOT | 1.268 | 0.329 (0.292) | 2.568 | 0.439 (0.274) | 5.279 | 0.634* (0.276) |
| ABAS-GAC | 0.629 | −0.270 (0.340) | 0.404 | −0.203 (0.319) | 0.168 | −0.131 (0.321) |
| ABAS-DAC | 0.328 | 0.102 (0.178) | 0.071 | 0.044 (0.166) | 0.157 | −0.066 (0.168) |
| ABAS-DAS | 0.869 | 0.163 (0.175) | 0.192 | 0.072 (0.164) | 1.205 | 0.182 (0.165) |
| ABAS-DAP | 0.000 | −0.003 (0.169) | 0.074 | 0.043 (0.158) | 0.002 | 0.007 (0.159) |
| IQ/GDQ | 0.426 | −0.039 (0.060) | 0.502 | 0.040 (0.057) | 0.124 | 0.020 (0.057) |
| R2 (adjusted) | 0.086 | 0.125 | 0.236 | |||
Multivariate analysis 3–6 years.
*p < 0.05.
3.2.3 6–18 years
Multivariate analysis shows that for the model associated with the 6–15 years age group ADOS-SA (Λ = 0.813 with F = 1,446; p < 0.005), PSI-TOT (Λ = 0.613 with F = 3,970; p < 0.005), ABAS-DAP (Λ = 0.851 with F = 1,097; p < 0.005), ABAS-DAC (Λ = 0.852 with F = 1,092; p < 0.005), have statistically significant effect in the model.
Specifically, univariate analyses indicate that higher ADOS-SA scores are associated with lower SWTD scores (β = −4,737, p < 0.05). Higher PSI-TOT scores are related to higher DIMS (β = 0,254, p < 0.05), higher SBD (β = 0,106, p < 0.05), and higher SWTD (β = 0,180, p < 0.05) scores.
Moreover, higher ABAS-DAP scores also have a significant effect on SBD (β = 0,532, p < 0.05) scores and DOES (β = 0,350, p < 0.05) scores (Tables 9, 10).
Table 9
| / | DIMS | SBD | DA | SWTD | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F | B (SE) | F | B (SE) | F | B (SE) | F | B (SE) | |
| Corrected model | 2.243 | / | 1.426 | / | 1.496 | / | 1.540 | / |
| Intercept | 0.336 | 17.717 (30.580) | 1.865 | 29.551 (21.641) | 0.199 | −12.742 (28.529) | 4.202 | 53.266 (25.966) |
| ADOS2 AS | 0.001 | −0.058 (2.161) | 1.557 | −1.908 (1.529) | 0.240 | −0.988 (2.016) | 6.664 | −4.737* (1.835) |
| ADOS2-RRB | 0.316 | 0.771 (1.370) | 2.339 | −1.483 (0.970) | 0.085 | 0.0.372 (1.278) | 1.122 | −1.232 (1.163) |
| ADOS2-TOT | 0.191 | −0.395 (0.903) | 1.593 | 0.806 (0.639) | 0.174 | 0.351 (0.842) | 1.902 | 1.057 (0.767) |
| PSI-TOT | 10.751 | 0.254* (0.078) | 3.732 | 0.106* (0.055) | 2.724 | 0.119 (0.072) | 7.510 | 0.180* (0.066) |
| CBCL-INT | 0.618 | 0.219 (0.279) | 1.097 | 0.207 (0.197) | 0.064 | −0.066 (0.260) | 0.007 | −0.020 (0.237) |
| CBCL-EXT | 2.148 | −0.724 (0.494) | 0.173 | 0.146 (0.350) | 0.124 | −0.162 (0.461) | 0.021 | 0.060 (0.414) |
| CBCL-TOT | 1.662 | 0.655 (0.508) | 0.354 | −0.214 (0.360) | 0.860 | 0.440 (0.474) | 0.000 | 0.006 (0.431) |
| ABAS-GAC | 2.970 | −1.050 (0.609) | 1.900 | −0.594 (0.431) | 1.173 | −0.615 (0.568) | 0.170 | −0.213 (0.517) |
| ABAS-DAC | 0.693 | 0.232 (0.278) | 1.402 | 0.233 (0.197) | 1.528 | 0.321 (0.260) | 0.449 | 0.158 (0.236) |
| ABAS-DAS | 1.408 | 0.324 (0.273) | 0.048 | −0.042 (0.193) | 3.389 | 0.468 (0.254) | 0.199 | 0.103 (0.232) |
| ABAS-DAP | 1.303 | 0.399 (0.350) | 4.625 | 0.532* (0.248) | 0.775 | 0.287 (0.326) | 0.021 | 0.043 (0.297) |
| IQ/GDQ | 0.830 | 0.123 (0.135) | 0.150 | 0.037 (0.096) | 1.709 | 0.165 (0.126) | 0.234 | −0.056 (0.115) |
| R2 (adjusted) | 0.194 | 0.076 | 0.088 | 0.095 | ||||
Multivariate analysis 6 + years.
*p < 0.05.
Table 10
| / | DOES | IPN | TOT | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F | B (SE) | F | B (SE) | F | B (SE) | |
| Corrected model | 2.417 | / | 1.133 | / | 1.957 | / |
| Intercept | 2.710 | 31.124 (18.905) | 1.167 | 24.154 (22.363) | 0.150 | 9.560 (24.651) |
| ADOS2 AS | 2.251 | −2.004 (1.336) | 1.666 | −2.040 (1.580) | 0.900 | −1.653 (1.742) |
| ADOS2-RRB | 0.514 | 0.608 (0.847) | 0.300 | −0.548 (1.002) | 0.132 | 0.401 (1.105) |
| ADOS2-TOT | 0.000 | −0.010 (0.558) | 1.466 | 0.799 (0.660) | 0.041 | 0.148 (0.728) |
| PSI-TOT | 0.091 | 0.014 (0.048) | 0.002 | 0.002 (0.057) | 2.809 | 0.105 (0.063) |
| CBCL-INT | 1.914 | 0.239 (0.173) | 1.369 | 0.239 (0.204) | 1.511 | 0.276 (0.225) |
| CBCL-EXT | 0.720 | −0.259 (0.305) | 0.817 | −0.326 (0.361) | 1.131 | −0.423 (0.398) |
| CBCL-TOT | 0.688 | 0.260 (0.314) | 1.115 | 0.392 (0.372) | 1.416 | 0.487 (0.410) |
| ABAS-GAC | 0.643 | −0.302 (0.377) | 1.003 | −0.446 (0.445) | 2.865 | −0.831 (0.491) |
| ABAS-DAC | 4.140 | 0.350 (0.172) | 2.869 | 0.345 (0.203) | 3.370 | 0.412 (0.224) |
| ABAS-DAS | 0.251 | −0.084 (0.169) | 0.089 | 0.060 (0.199) | 0.751 | 0.191 (0.220) |
| ABAS-DAP | 0.277 | 0.114* (0.216) | 1.561 | 0.320 (0.256) | 1.463 | 0.341 (0.282) |
| IQ/GDQ | 0.358 | 0.050 (0.084) | 0.859 | −0.092 (0.099) | 0.938 | 0.106 (0.109) |
| R2 (adjusted) | 0.215 | 0.025 | 0.156 | |||
Multivariate analysis 6 + years.
*p < 0.05.
4 Discussion
The current study assessed the prevalence of sleep problems in a relatively large group of autistic children and adolescents. The aim of the present study was to explore the age-specific relationship between sleep disorders, cognitive development, severity of ASD, behavioral and emotional symptoms, and Parenting stress in a sample of autistic children.
To achieve the study’s aim, the sample was divided into three subgroups based on different age groups identified by the SDSC tool used. The effects of clinical features on various sleep domains across different age groups were evaluated and discussed.
4.1 Sleep and autism: developmental insights from children aged 6–36 months
We examined the relationship between sleep disorders and clinical features such as ASD symptomatology, behavioral challenges, and cognitive abilities. We found that children with more pronounced autism-related behaviors often struggled with initiating sleep. Behavioral problems were linked to distinct sleep patterns, with emotional regulation difficulties playing a key role. Additionally, higher cognitive abilities were associated with specific sleep disorders, suggesting a complex relationship between intelligence and sleep architecture. These findings highlight the relationship between developmental and behavioral factors in shaping sleep patterns during early childhood.
We found a positive association between higher ADOS-TOT scores and higher Disorders of Initiating Sleep scores in children aged 6–36 months. This finding highlights a connection between higher autism symptomatology and increased difficulties in initiating sleep in early childhood.
Our findings are consistent with existing literature, which identifies difficulties with initiating sleep as a prevalent and core characteristic of ASD (Sommers et al., 2024; Richdale, 1999; Liu et al., 2006; Krakowiak et al., 2008; ). However, the reasons for their co-occurrence remain poorly understood. One possible explanation is that they may arise from shared underlying etiological factors (Taylor et al., 2022).
Another possible explanation might concern the main features of ASD. ADOS TOTAL score is used to classify the condition into autism, autism spectrum, or non-autism (; Park et al., 2018). Higher ADOS-TOT scores reflect more pronounced autism-related behaviors. Autistic children often show heightened sensitivity to sensory stimuli (Sapey-Triomphe et al., 2023), such as light, noise, or bedding textures, which can interfere with their ability to relax and fall asleep. Behavioral and cognitive rigidity represent other key symptoms in autistic children (Lage et al., 2024). Cognitive flexibility refers to the ability to switch between different tasks or strategies and adapt to changing situations (Lage et al., 2024; ). For autistic people, predictability plays a pivotal role. Consistent routines produce a structured framework that helps them anticipate what comes next. According to this, any disruptions to everyday routines, even in terms of bedtime rituals and sleep environment, may increase stress and interfere with the phase of falling asleep.
In addition, delays in language development in autistic children are commonly observed (Singhi and Malhi, 2023). As a result, sleep difficulties might show when language impairment and communication challenges possibly reflect difficulties in expressing discomfort, fear, or other needs. This finding is consistent with previous polysomnographic studies showing that variations in slow-wave (NREM) and REM sleep are associated with core ASD symptoms and behavioral profiles, suggesting that atypical sleep stage composition may relate to characteristic neurobehavioral patterns in ASD (Kawai et al., 2023). However, our study relied on the Sleep Disturbance Scale for Children (SDSC), a validated questionnaire assessing subjective and behavioral aspects of sleep. Consequently, while our results align with polysomnographic findings, they cannot be interpreted as direct evidence of neurobiological alterations; rather, reflect parent-reported sleep difficulties relative to age-normed expectations.
Moreover, we found an association between higher ADOS-SA scores and lower Disorders of Excessive Somnolence scores in children aged 6–36 months. This finding reflects a behavioral pattern in which greater social-affective difficulties—such as reduced social engagement—were associated with fewer signs of excessive somnolence during the day.
As a matter of fact, children with higher ADOS-SA scores show reduced interest in their social environment (; Hus et al., 2014), including socioemotional interactions and play-oriented activities. Epidemiological research has shown that both social and physical environmental factors can significantly influence sleep patterns and contribute to sleep disorders (Johnson et al., 2018). Limited social interaction may be associated with lower emotional and cognitive arousal, making it easier to transition into sleep and reducing nighttime disturbances.
We also found that higher CBCL-INT scores were associated with lower scores on Disorders of Maintaining Sleep, Parasomnias, and Total Sleep Disorders in children aged 6–36 months. From a behavioral perspective, this finding suggests that higher levels of internalizing symptoms were associated with fewer difficulties in maintaining sleep, fewer parasomnia-related behaviors, and fewer overall sleep disruptions in early childhood. These findings diverge from existing literature (; ; ) and require careful interpretation. It should be noted that the internalizing subscale of the CBCL version for children aged 1.5–5 years includes a small number of items assessing sleep-related problems, which may partially overlap with SDSC measures. However, these items refer to specific behavioral manifestations of sleep difficulties and represent only a limited component of the broader internalizing domain. In contrast, the SDSC provides a more detailed and domain-specific assessment of sleep disturbances. Several hypotheses may explain this finding.
First, the discrepancy may arise from differences in caregivers’ perceptions and interpretations. Internalizing problems are often less visible than externalizing behaviors like aggression or hyperactivity (). Moreover, internalizing symptoms in this age group may overlap with core ASD symptoms. Autistic children aged 6–36 months often exhibit social withdrawal (Zhou and Buss, 2021) that caregivers may perceive as internalizing behavior rather than recognizing it as potential signs of ASD. These emerging difficulties could lead parents to focus on behavioral challenges rather than recognizing sleep-related issues. Furthermore, language impairments commonly observed in autistic children (Singhi and Malhi, 2023) may hinder caregivers from accurately identifying parasomnias or other sleep disorders.
Second, the relationship between internalizing symptoms and sleep difficulties may be mediated by factors not directly evaluated in our study, such as temperament and parenting practices. Temperament traits are closely linked to behavioral and emotional regulation, playing a mediating role (Sacrey et al., 2022). Internalizing symptoms in childhood are linked to a higher level of effortful control, leading to a behavioral pattern of overcontrol (Tandon et al., 2009) that might be extended to sleep. Parasomnias often occur during NREM sleep, particularly in its deeper stages (Howell, 2012). Consequently, conditions that lead to frequent nighttime awakenings (such as higher levels of control) may reduce the time spent in these sleep stages. This idea aligns with the findings of Wu et al. (2022), demonstrating an inverse relationship between sleep duration and internalizing symptoms.
Parenting behaviors may also influence the relationship between internalizing symptoms and sleep (van der Sluis et al., 2015). Parents’ perception of their children’s quality of sleep is based primarily on whether they wake up during the night (). Specific parenting strategies may be associated with underreporting of children’s sleep difficulties, leading caregivers to minimize their children’s sleep difficulties.
Furthermore, some items within the CBCL, particularly for internalizing behaviors, already capture elements related to sleep (Gregory et al., 2011) which could also overlap with manifestations of sleep disturbance. As a result, these symptoms may contribute to CBCL-INT scores without being recognized as distinct sleep disorders associated with SDSC scores. Sleep problems could be underreported or viewed as part of the child’s overall emotional struggles rather than distinct sleep disorders.
These findings highlight the need for further research to explore the intricate interactions between internalizing symptoms, temperament, parenting practices, and sleep in young autistic children.
When examining externalizing behaviors, our study revealed an association between higher CBCL-EXT scores and lower Disorders of Maintaining Sleep scores in children aged 6–36 months. From a behavioral perspective, greater expression of externalizing symptoms (such as aggression and hyperactivity) was associated with fewer observed problems related to maintaining sleep. One possible explanation regards the strength of externalizing symptoms. Externalizing behaviors, such as hyperactivity, require significant energy throughout the day. This may result in physical overtiredness, which can make these children fall asleep more easily and experience better sleep maintenance due to fatigue (Weiss and Salpekar, 2010). Another potential explanation regards parenting point of view. Several studies show how sensitive parenting during the first 3 years of a child’s life is associated with fewer externalizing behaviors in early and middle childhood (; ; Wang et al., 2013; Shaw et al., 1994). Parental sensitivity refers to the ability to recognize and respond appropriately to their child’s needs (Wang et al., 2013). Caregivers, who frequently deal with externalizing behaviors, may focus on daytime challenges, thereby unintentionally neglecting sleep-related concerns, resulting in a less accurate assessment of the child’s sleep issues. As a result, they may perceive the child’s sleep as less problematic, particularly compared with the behavioral challenges during the day.
Our analysis revealed a positive association between CBCL-TOT scores and Total Sleep Disorders scores in children aged 6–36 months. The CBCL-TOT scores reflect not only behavioral and emotional difficulties but also children’s challenges with emotional regulation (), critical for sleep (Lollies et al., 2022). Difficulties in emotional regulation are closely linked to difficulties in maintaining restorative sleep patterns. Moreover, this relationship may be bidirectional: poor sleep exacerbates emotional and behavioral issues, while emotional and behavioral difficulties in turn disrupt sleep, building a reinforcing cycle (Kahn et al., 2013).
Finally, we found an association between higher levels of IQ and higher levels of Parasomnias and Disorders of Excessive Somnolence scores in children 6–36 months. Thieux et al. (2024) reported that children with high IQ exhibit increased rapid eye movement (REM) sleep, particularly during the later part of the night, suggesting a potential relationship between cognitive functions and sleep architecture. However, the sleep questionnaire utilized in our study was not designed to differentiate between specific parasomnia subtypes, including those associated with REM and NREM sleep phases (; Romeo et al., 2021; Romeo et al., 2013). While existing literature has identified associations between specific parasomnia typologies and sleep phases (Markov et al., 2006), the relationship between intellectual functioning, parasomnias, and excessive somnolence remains unclear. This highlights the need for further research to elucidate the relationship between cognitive abilities, parasomnia characteristics, and excessive somnolence.
4.2 Sleep and autism: developmental insights from children aged 3–6 years
Our analysis uncovered a positive association between CBCL-TOT and total Sleep Disorders scores in children aged 3–6 years, consistent with our previous findings in children aged 6–36 months. This connection supports the regulation hypothesis and suggests the presence of stable trajectories linking behavioral and sleep difficulties across early developmental stages (Lollies et al., 2022).
In this regard, our results align with several studies (Taylor et al., 2012; Sikora et al., 2012; ; Zaidman-Zait et al., 2020). Emotional regulation and sleep difficulties are common in young children with neurodevelopmental disorders. However, the direction of this relationship remains under investigation (). Emotion regulation is a complex process involving the monitoring, evaluation, and modulation of emotional responses (Gross, 1998), including reducing emotional arousal (Gratz and Roemer, 2008). When individuals struggle to regulate their emotional or physiological states, difficulties in falling or maintaining sleep may be observed. As a matter of fact, the presence of emotional dysregulation has been demonstrated in patients with sleep disorders (Palagini et al., 2017). In particular, sleep disorders were closely linked to emotional dysregulation in young autistic children, both in cross-sectional and longitudinal analyses. Moreover, emotional dysregulation was associated with behavioral challenges, including sleep difficulties and internalizing symptoms.
Moreover, several studies suggest that the core features of ASD may contribute to the development of emotional dysregulation, with repetitive behaviors, social difficulties, and alexithymia acting as key promoting factors (; ; Morie et al., 2019; Samson et al., 2014), possibly explaining the frequent co-occurrence of ASD and sleep disorders.
4.3 Sleep and autism: developmental insights from children aged 6–18 years
We identified significant associations between sleep disorders and developmental, behavioral, and parental factors.
The analysis identified an association between higher ADOS-SA scores and lower Sleep–Wake Transition Disorders scores in children aged 6–18 years. These results could be explained by the evidence that autistic children with high levels of autistic symptomatology, including impairments in social interaction and communication, may prefer rigid routines and predictable environments (), which are factors that promote better sleep quality and a smoother transition between sleep and wakefulness (Mindell et al., 2015). The predictability and structure of routines could reduce anxiety (Lang et al., 2022; Sellick et al., 2021), which may otherwise impede the transition between sleep and wakefulness.
Furthermore, we found an association between higher PSI-TOT scores and higher Disorders of Initiating and Maintaining Sleep, Sleep Breathing Disorders, and Sleep Waking Transition Disorders scores in children aged 6–18 years. Children with social difficulties and behavioral problems can be associated with higher-level parenting levels of parenting stress (Neece et al., 2012; Ribas et al., 2024). Accordingly, caregivers may struggle to provide emotional support and to employ effective strategies for regulating their child’s behavior and emotions. When parents are overwhelmed, they may have fewer resources—both physically and emotionally—to implement high-quality regulatory strategies. This lack of regulation and support may be associated with greater difficulties in managing sleep-related issues (; Iwamoto et al., 2023).
Finally, our analysis showed a positive association between higher ABAS-DAP scores and Sleep Breathing Disorders and Disorders of Excessive Somnolence scores, suggesting a potential link between adaptive behavior and sleep regulation. The Practice Domain of the ABAS-II focuses on the everyday skills required for living, including personal care and task management across different settings.
Specific sleep disorders may impact adaptive behavior (Sikora et al., 2012; Hammond et al., 2022). However, the nature of this relationship remains unclear, with limited evidence on whether sleep disorders may contribute to difficulties in adaptive behavior or if impairments in adaptive behavior increase the likelihood of sleep disorders. Our proposed explanation suggests an indirect association, where adaptive behavior influences sleep patterns, which may be influenced by other factors. Notably, higher levels of adaptive behavior are often associated with higher IQ (Tassé and Kim, 2023). Higher IQ in autistic children is frequently linked to comorbidities such as anxiety or mood disorders (Mingins et al., 2021) which may be associated with variations in sleep patterns. Adolescents and school-age children have the highest prevalence of clinical and subclinical anxiety compared to other autistic age groups (Zaboski and Storch, 2018). Anxiety disorders are characterized by a wide range of symptoms, including excessive worry, social and performance fears, unexpected or triggered panic attacks, anticipatory anxiety, and avoidance behaviors. These conditions may also manifest as hyperarousal and difficulty concentrating (Szuhany and Simon, 2022; Robinson et al., 2013) possibly leading to higher sleep disorders.
Notably, no significant associations were found between CBCL scores and sleep disorders in this age group, highlighting the complex and multifaceted nature of sleep-related challenges in autistic children and behavioral issues. This suggests that other factors, beyond general behavioral and emotional difficulties, may play a more prominent role in shaping sleep patterns at later developmental stages.
5 Conclusion
This study highlights the association between clinical features and sleep disorders across different age groups in autistic children. The analysis identified age-specific differences in the relationships between ASD symptoms, emotional and behavioral challenges, and sleep difficulties.
Our findings suggest that sleep disorders in autistic children are not exclusively influenced by the core features of the disorder. A dynamic interplay of developmental and environmental factors over time was observed. The study emphasizes the importance of considering age-specific factors when examining sleep patterns in autistic children. The impact of behavioral and emotional challenges on sleep may vary across different developmental stages. Due to this variability, the study underscores the need for age-specific analysis in line with children’s changing developmental trajectories and symptom profiles.
Furthermore, the impact of parenting stress on sleep difficulties highlights the importance of supporting families to improve sleep outcomes in autistic children.
Given the heterogeneity of sleep disorders across age groups, tailored interventions are essential for optimizing sleep quality and enhancing the quality of life for both children and their caregivers. A multidisciplinary approach that integrates behavioral, medical, and environmental strategies can significantly enhance sleep quality, thereby improving daytime functioning and overall quality of life for both children and their families. Future research should continue to explore individualized intervention models that integrate behavioral, pharmacological, and technological solutions to optimize sleep outcomes in this population.
5.1 Study limitations and future directions
The current study has several limitations. First, the study’s cross-sectional and retrospective design precludes causal inferences regarding the association between sleep disorders and clinical features. Longitudinal studies are essential to clarify the directionality of these relationships.
Another limitation concerns the use of parent-report measures and the lack of objective sleep measures, which may introduce reporting bias and limit the accuracy of assessing children’s sleep patterns, as suggested by small-to-moderate associations between parenting stress and parent-reported outcomes. However, autism severity and cognitive functioning were assessed by clinicians, limiting the impact of shared-method variance for these core clinical variables.
Sleep was assessed exclusively via parent-report questionnaires. While objective measures such as actigraphy or polysomnography were not included, the Sleep Disturbance Scale for Children (SDSC) has been validated in the Italian population, including children with ASD, supporting its reliability and clinical relevance (Mignolli et al., 2022). Studies comparing SDSC scores with objective sleep measures, including actigraphy and polysomnography, indicate moderate concordance, demonstrating that parent-reported difficulties generally reflect actual sleep problems, though the correlation is not perfect (Pinghini et al., 2025). This highlights that SDSC and objective measures capture complementary aspects of sleep: SDSC reflects perceived behavioral and clinical difficulties, whereas actigraphy and polysomnography measure physiological sleep parameters. Incorporating objective assessments in future research would strengthen the evaluation of sleep patterns and reduce potential reporting bias.
Furthermore, the potential impact of biological, environmental, and familial factors, including temperament, daily routines, and socioeconomic status, was not assessed. Parental bedtime routines and sleep-related parenting practices were not investigated. Previous studies in at-risk populations have shown that parental sleep routines can significantly influence children’s sleep patterns and may also be associated with language development (Zuccarini et al., 2024; Sansavini et al., 2022).
Additionally, common comorbidities in ASD, such as anxiety, depression, and epilepsy, were not specifically addressed. Future research should include these variables.
The role of parenting stress warrants further investigation. Parenting stress interacts bidirectionally with child sleep disorders and behavioral challenges, creating a complex feedback loop. Future research should focus on clarifying these dynamics, particularly by examining the mediating or moderating role of caregiver stress in the relationship between child behavior and sleep disorders.
Although non-verbal IQ (Leiter-3), full-scale IQ (WISC-IV), and developmental quotient (Griffiths) measure overlapping cognitive constructs, research has shown that even theoretically similar constructs derived from different cognitive batteries may not be fully equivalent due to differences in test composition, normative samples, and relative weighting of cognitive domains (Salthouse, 2014).
Finally, the lack of significant associations between CBCL scores and sleep disorders in older children suggests that other factors may shape sleep patterns during adolescence, warranting further investigation.
Despite these limitations, the study has notable strengths. First, the sample was homogeneous across different age groups. The inclusion of both standardized questionnaires and parent-report measures strengthened the reliability of the findings, reflecting both clinical observations and real-world experiences.
Additionally, the study examined multiple domains of development, improving the accuracy of the findings and reducing the impact of confounding variables.
Statements
Data availability statement
The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article will be made available by the authors, without undue reservation.
Ethics statement
This study was conducted according to the guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki and was approved by the local Ethics Committee (protocol code: 2423_OPBG_2021, approved on 27 October 2021).
Author contributions
AP: Conceptualization, Investigation, Resources, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. ML: Data curation, Methodology, Supervision, Writing – review & editing. SG: Supervision, Writing – review & editing. EF: Supervision, Writing – review & editing. LC: Supervision, Writing – review & editing. AM: Supervision, Writing – review & editing. SV: Supervision, Writing – review & editing. GV: Conceptualization, Supervision, Validation, Writing – review & editing.
Funding
The author(s) declared that financial support was received for this work and/or its publication. This study was supported by the Italian Ministry of Health with Current Research funds.
Conflict of interest
The author(s) declared that this work was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Generative AI statement
The author(s) declared that Generative AI was not used in the creation of this manuscript.
Any alternative text (alt text) provided alongside figures in this article has been generated by Frontiers with the support of artificial intelligence and reasonable efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, including review by the authors wherever possible. If you identify any issues, please contact us.
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
- ADOS-SA
Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule – Second Edition, Social Affect score
- ADOS-RRB
Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule – Second Edition, Restricted and Repetitive Behaviors score
- ADOS-TOT
Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule–Second Edition, Total score
- CBCL-INT
Child Behavior Checklist, Internalizing Problems scale
- CBCL-EXT
Child Behavior Checklist, Externalizing Problems scale
- CBCL-TOT
Child Behavior Checklist, Total Problems score
- IQ
Intelligence Quotient
- DQ/GDQ
General Developmental Quotient
- SDSC-TOT
Sleep Disturbance Scale for Children, Total score
- DIMS
Disorders of Initiating and Maintaining Sleep
- DIS
Disorders of Initiating Sleep
- DMS
Disorders of Maintaining Sleep
- PARA
Parasomnias
- SBD
Sleep Breathing Disorders
- SWTD
Sleep–Wake Transition Disorders
- DOES
Disorders of Excessive Somnolence
- NRS
Non-Restorative Sleep
- PSI-TOT
Parenting Stress Index, Total score
- ABAS-GAC
Adaptive Behavior Assessment System, General Adaptive Composite
- ABAS-DAC
Adaptive Behavior Assessment System, Communication domain
- ABAS-DAS
Adaptive Behavior Assessment System, Social domain
- ABAS-DAP
Adaptive Behavior Assessment System, Practical domain
- F
F statistic
- B
Unstandardized regression coefficient
- SE
Standard Error
- R2
Coefficient of determination
- r
Pearson’s correlation coefficient
- p
p-value
Glossary
References
1
AathiraR.GulatiS.TripathiM.ShuklaG.ChakrabartyB.SapraS.et al. (2017). Prevalence of sleep abnormalities in Indian children with autism Spectrum disorder: a cross-sectional study. Pediatr. Neurol.74, 62–67. doi: 10.1016/j.pediatrneurol.2017.05.019,
2
AbidinR. R. (1996). Parenting stress index: Manual. 3rd Edn. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
3
AchenbachT. M. (2011). “Child behavior checklist” in Encyclopedia of clinical neuropsychology (New York, NY: Springer New York), 546–552.
4
AchenbachT.RescorlaL. A. (2001). Manual for the ASEBA preschool forms & profiles. Burlington, Vermont, USA: ASEBA.
5
AdynskiH.PropperC.BeeberL.GilmoreJ. H.ZouB.SantosH. P. (2024). The role of emotional regulation on early child school adjustment outcomes. Arch. Psychiatr. Nurs.51, 201–211. doi: 10.1016/j.apnu.2024.07.003,
6
Aguilar-YamuzaB.Herruzo-PinoC.Lucena-JuradoV.Raya-TrenasA. F.Pino-OsunaM. J. (2023). Internalizing problems in childhood and adolescence: the role of the family. Alpha Psychiatry.24, 87–92. doi: 10.5152/alphapsychiatry.2023.221086,
7
AitkenM.BattagliaM.MarinoC.MahendranN.AndradeB. F. (2019). Clinical utility of the CBCL dysregulation profile in children with disruptive behavior. J. Affect. Disord.253, 87–95. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2019.04.034,
8
Al-BeltagiM. (2021). Autism medical comorbidities. World J. Clin. Pediatr.10, 15–28. doi: 10.5409/wjcp.v10.i3.15,
9
AllikH.LarssonJ. O.SmedjeH. (2006). Sleep patterns of school-age children with Asperger syndrome or high-functioning autism. J. Autism Dev. Disord.36, 585–595. doi: 10.1007/s10803-006-0099-9,
10
Al-MamariW.IdrisA. B.DakakS.Al-ShekailiM.Al-HarthiZ.AlnaamaniA. M.et al. (2019). Revisiting the prevalence of autism spectrum disorder among Omani children: a multicentre study. Sultan Qaboos Univ. Med. J.19, e305–e309. doi: 10.18295/squmj.2019.19.04.005
11
AlthoffR. R.AyerL. A.RettewD. C.HudziakJ. J. (2010). Assessment of dysregulated children using the child behavior checklist: a receiver operating characteristic curve analysis. Psychol. Assess.22, 609–617. doi: 10.1037/a0019699,
12
American Psychiatric Association (2022). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders. Washington, DC, USA: American Psychiatric Association Publishing.
13
BarlattaniT.D’AmelioC.CavatassiA.De LucaD.Di StefanoR.di BerardoA.et al. (2023). Autism spectrum disorders and psychiatric comorbidities: a narrative review. J. Psychopathol.29, 3–29. doi: 10.36148/2284-0249-N281
14
BaumanM. L. (2010). Medical comorbidities in autism: challenges to diagnosis and treatment. Neurotherapeutics7, 320–327. doi: 10.1016/j.nurt.2010.06.001,
15
BerkovitsL.EisenhowerA.BlacherJ. (2017). Emotion regulation in young children with autism Spectrum disorders. J. Autism Dev. Disord.47, 68–79. doi: 10.1007/s10803-016-2922-2,
16
BerlocoB.GuerreraS.FucàE.MenghiniD.ValeriG.NobiliL.et al. (2024). Insomnia in children with autism spectrum disorder: a cross-sectional study on clinical correlates and parental stress. J. Autism Dev. Disord.54, 46–55. doi: 10.1007/s10803-022-05793-8
17
BernardiK.PronoF.BruniG.PaneraiS.FerriR.BruniO. (2023). Sleep disturbances in subjects with autism spectrum disorder: a parental perspective. Sleep Med.110, 220–224. doi: 10.1016/j.sleep.2023.08.020,
18
BradleyR. H.CorwynR. F. (2008). Infant temperament, parenting, and externalizing behavior in first grade: a test of the differential susceptibility hypothesis. J. Child Psychol. Psychiatry49, 124–131. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7610.2007.01829.x,
19
BruniO.OttavianoS.GuidettiV.RomoliM.InnocenziM.CortesiF.et al. (1996). The sleep disturbance scale for children (SDSC). Construction and validation of an instrument to evaluate sleep disturbances in childhood and adolescence. J. Sleep Res.5, 251–261. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2869.1996.00251.x,
20
BurmanD.RamanujamK.ManzarD.ChattuV. K.SpenceD. W.ZakiN. F. W.et al. (2023). Sleep and autism spectrum disorder: a comprehensive review of diagnosis, markers, interventions, and treatments. Sleep Vigil.7, 9–22. doi: 10.1007/s41782-022-00222-3
21
CakirJ.FryeR. E.WalkerS. J. (2020). The lifetime social cost of autism: 1990–2029. Res. Autism Spectr. Disord.72:101502. doi: 10.1016/j.rasd.2019.101502
22
CarskadonM. A.DementW. C. (2011). Normal Human Sleep Principles and practice of sleep medicine. Philadelphia, PA, USA: Elsevier, 16–26.
23
ChenX.LiuH.WuY.XuanK.ZhaoT.SunY. (2021). Characteristics of sleep architecture in autism spectrum disorders: a meta-analysis based on polysomnographic research. Psychiatry Res.296:113677. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2020.113677,
24
CloudZ. C. G.SpittleA.CheongJ.DoyleL. W.AndersonP. J.TreyvaudK. (2024). Predicting externalizing behaviors in typically developing toddlers at 24 months: insights from parenting at 12 months. Infant Behav. Dev.76:101964. doi: 10.1016/j.infbeh.2024.101964,
25
CohenS.ConduitR.LockleyS. W.RajaratnamS. M.CornishK. M. (2014). The relationship between sleep and behavior in autism spectrum disorder (ASD): a review. J. Neurodev. Disord.6:44. doi: 10.1186/1866-1955-6-44,
26
DajaniD. R.UddinL. Q. (2015). Demystifying cognitive flexibility: implications for clinical and developmental neuroscience. Trends Neurosci.38, 571–578. doi: 10.1016/j.tins.2015.07.003,
27
DeFilippisM. (2018). Depression in children and adolescents with autism spectrum disorder. Children5:112. doi: 10.3390/children5090112,
28
Dell’OssoL.MassoniL.BattagliniS.De FeliceC.NardiB.AmatoriG.et al. (2023). Emotional dysregulation as a part of the autism spectrum continuum: a literature review from late childhood to adulthood. Front. Psych.14:1234518. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1234518,
29
Díaz-RománA.ZhangJ.DelormeR.BeggiatoA.CorteseS. (2018). Sleep in youth with autism spectrum disorders: systematic review and meta-analysis of subjective and objective studies. Evidence Based Mental Health.21, 146–154. doi: 10.1136/ebmental-2018-300037,
30
ElrodM. G.NylundC. M.SusiA. L.GormanG. H.Hisle-GormanE.RogersD. J.et al. (2016). Prevalence of diagnosed sleep disorders and related diagnostic and surgical procedures in children with autism spectrum disorders. J. Dev. Behav. Pediatr.37, 377–384. doi: 10.1097/DBP.0000000000000248,
31
FadiniC. C.LamonicaD. A.Fett-ConteA. C.OsorioE.ZuculoG. M.GiachetiC. M.et al. (2015). Influence of sleep disorders on the behavior of individuals with autism spectrum disorder. Front. Hum. Neurosci.9:347. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2015.00347,
32
FatemehG.SajjadM.NiloufarR.NedaS.LeilaS.KhadijehM. (2022). Effect of melatonin supplementation on sleep quality: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J. Neurol.269, 205–216. doi: 10.1007/s00415-020-10381-w,
33
FavoleI.DavicoC.MarcotulliD.SoderoR.SveviB.AmiantoF.et al. (2023). Sleep disturbances and emotional dysregulation in young children with autism spectrum, intellectual disability, or global developmental delay. Sleep Med.105, 45–52. doi: 10.1016/j.sleep.2023.02.026,
34
Gisbert GustempsL.Lugo MarínJ.Setien RamosI.Ibañez JimenezP.Romero Santo-TomásO.Jurado LuqueM. J.et al. (2021). Sleep disturbances in autism spectrum disorder without intellectual impairment: relationship with executive function and psychiatric symptoms. Sleep Med.83, 106–114. doi: 10.1016/j.sleep.2021.04.022,
35
GoldmanS. E.BichellT. J.SurdykaK.MalowB. A. (2012). Sleep in children and adolescents with Angelman syndrome: association with parent sleep and stress. J. Intellect. Disabil. Res.56, 600–608. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2788.2011.01499.x,
36
GoldmanS. E.McGrewS.JohnsonK. P.RichdaleA. L.ClemonsT.MalowB. A. (2011). Sleep is associated with problem behaviors in children and adolescents with autism spectrum disorders. Res. Autism Spectr. Disord.5, 1223–1229. doi: 10.1016/j.rasd.2011.01.010
37
GoldmanS. E.SurdykaK.CuevasR.AdkinsK.WangL.MalowB. A. (2009). Defining the sleep phenotype in children with autism. Dev. Neuropsychol.34, 560–573. doi: 10.1080/87565640903133509,
38
GomesA. M.MartinsM. C. (2021). Child perception and parent’s perception about child sleep quality. Sleep Sci14, 342–347. doi: 10.5935/1984-0063.20200107,
39
GormleyE.RyanC.McCuskerC. (2022). Alexithymia is associated with emotion dysregulation in young people with autism spectrum disorder. J. Dev. Phys. Disabil.34, 171–186. doi: 10.1007/s10882-021-09795-9
40
GothamK.PicklesA.LordC. (2009). Standardizing ADOS scores for a measure of severity in autism Spectrum disorders. J. Autism Dev. Disord.39, 693–705. doi: 10.1007/s10803-008-0674-3,
41
GothamK.RisiS.PicklesA.LordC. (2007). The autism diagnostic observation schedule: revised algorithms for improved diagnostic validity. J. Autism Dev. Disord.37, 613–627. doi: 10.1007/s10803-006-0280-1,
42
GratzK. L.RoemerL. (2008). Multidimensional assessment of emotion regulation and dysregulation: development, factor structure, and initial validation of the difficulties in emotion regulation scale. J. Psychopathol. Behav. Assess.30, 315–315. doi: 10.1007/s10862-008-9102-4
43
GreenE.StroudL.BloomfieldS.CronjeJ.FoxcroftC.HurterK.et al. (2016). Griffiths scales of child development. 3rd Edn. Oxford, UK: Hogrefe.
44
GregoryA. M.CousinsJ. C.ForbesE. E.TrubnickL.RyanN. D.AxelsonD. A.et al. (2011). Sleep items in the child behavior checklist: a comparison with sleep diaries, actigraphy, and polysomnography. J. Am. Acad. Child Adolesc. Psychiatry50, 499–507. doi: 10.1016/j.jaac.2011.02.003,
45
GriffithsR.LuizD.Association for Research in Infant and Child Development (2006). Griffiths mental development scales, extended revised: GMDS-ER; two to eight years. Oxford, UK: Hogrefe.
46
GrossJ. J. (1998). The emerging field of emotion regulation: an integrative review. Rev. Gen. Psychol.2, 271–299. doi: 10.1037/1089-2680.2.3.271
47
GuerreraS.FucàE.PetroloE.De StefanoA.CasulaL.LogriecoM. G.et al. (2025). Exploring the clinical features of minimally verbal autistic children. Front. Psych.16:1549092. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2025.1549092,
48
HammondL.JolyV.KapasiA.KryskaK.AndrewG.OberlanderT. F.et al. (2022). Adaptive behavior, sleep, and physical activity in adolescents with fetal alcohol spectrum disorder. Res. Dev. Disabil.131:104366. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2022.104366,
49
HanrattyJ.LivingstoneN.RobalinoS.TerweeC. B.GlodM.OonoI. P.et al. (2015). Systematic review of the measurement properties of tools used to measure behaviour problems in young children with autism. PLoS One10:e0144649. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0144649,
50
HarrisonP.OaklandT. (2003). Adaptive behavior assessment system. 2nd Edn. San Antonio, TX: Harcourt Assessment.
51
HossainM. M.KhanN.SultanaA.MaP.McKyerE. L. J.AhmedH. U.et al. (2020). Prevalence of comorbid psychiatric disorders among people with autism spectrum disorder: an umbrella review of systematic reviews and meta-analyses. Psychiatry Res.287:112922. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2020.112922
52
HowellM. J. (2012). Parasomnias: an updated review. Neurotherapeutics9, 753–775. doi: 10.1007/s13311-012-0143-8,
53
HusV.GothamK.LordC. (2014). Standardizing ADOS domain scores: separating severity of social affect and restricted and repetitive behaviors. J. Autism Dev. Disord.44, 2400–2412. doi: 10.1007/s10803-012-1719-1,
54
IBM Corp (2020). IBM SPSS statistics (version 27.0). Armonk, NY: IBM Corp.
55
IwamotoB. K.NeeceC. L.NairA.RockwoodN. J.FenningR. M.KrantzM. L.et al. (2023). Exploring bidirectional relationships: child sleep duration, child behavior problems, and parenting stress in families of children with autism spectrum disorder. Res. Autism Spectr. Disord.106:102197. doi: 10.1016/j.rasd.2023.102197,
56
JanvierD.ChoiY. B.KleinC.LordC.KimS. H. (2022). Brief report: examining test-retest reliability of the autism diagnostic observation schedule (ADOS-2) calibrated severity scores (CSS). J. Autism Dev. Disord.52, 1388–1394. doi: 10.1007/s10803-021-04952-7,
57
JohnsonD. A.BillingsM. E.HaleL. (2018). Environmental determinants of insufficient sleep and sleep disorders: implications for population health. Curr. Epidemiol. Rep.5, 61–69. doi: 10.1007/s40471-018-0139-y,
58
JohnsonC. R.SmithT.DeMandA.LecavalierL.EvansV.GurkaM.et al. (2018). Exploring sleep quality of young children with autism spectrum disorder and disruptive behaviors. Sleep Med.44, 61–66. doi: 10.1016/j.sleep.2018.01.008,
59
KahnM.SheppesG.SadehA. (2013). Sleep and emotions: bidirectional links and underlying mechanisms. Int. J. Psychophysiol.89, 218–228. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2013.05.010,
60
KawaiM.BuckC.ChickC. F.AnkerL.TalbotL.SchneiderL.et al. (2023). Sleep architecture is associated with core symptom severity in autism spectrum disorder. Sleep46:zsac273. doi: 10.1093/sleep/zsac273
61
KochC.RoidG. H.MillerL. J.PomplunM. (2013) in Leiter international performance scale, third edition (Leiter-3). eds. BelacchiC.CornoldiC.GiofrèD.. 3rd ed (Firenze: Giunti Organizzazioni Speciali).
62
KrakowiakP.Goodlin-JonesB.Hertz-PicciottoI.CroneL. A.HansenR. L. (2008). Sleep problems in children with autism spectrum disorders, developmental delays, and typical development: a population-based study. J. Sleep Res.17, 197–206. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2869.2008.00650.x,
63
LageC.SmithE. S.LawsonR. P. (2024). A meta-analysis of cognitive flexibility in autism spectrum disorder. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev.157:105511. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2023.105511,
64
LaiM. C.KasseeC.BesneyR.BonatoS.HullL.MandyW.et al. (2019). Prevalence of co-occurring mental health diagnoses in the autism population: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Psychiatry6, 819–829. doi: 10.1016/S2215-0366(19)30289-5,
65
LangM.KrátkýJ.XygalatasD. (2022). Effects of predictable behavioral patterns on anxiety dynamics. Sci. Rep.12:19240. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-23885-4,
66
LenehanS. M.FogartyL.O’ConnorC.MathiesonS.BoylanG. B. (2023). The architecture of early childhood sleep over the first two years. Matern. Child Health J.27, 226–250. doi: 10.1007/s10995-022-03545-9,
67
LiuX.HubbardJ. A.FabesR. A.AdamJ. B. (2006). Sleep disturbances and correlates of children with autism spectrum disorders. Child Psychiatry Hum. Dev.37, 179–191. doi: 10.1007/s10578-006-0028-3,
68
LolliesF.SchnatschmidtM.BihlmeierI.GenuneitJ.In-AlbnonT.HoltmannM.et al. (2022). Associations of sleep and emotion regulation processes in childhood and adolescence - a systematic review, report of methodological challenges and future directions. Sleep Sci15, 490–514. doi: 10.5935/1984-0063.20220082,
69
LordC.ElsabbaghM.BairdG.Veenstra-VanderweeleJ. (2018). Autism spectrum disorder. Lancet392, 508–520. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31129-2,
70
LordC.RutterM.DiLavoreP. C.RisiS.LuysterR. J.GothamK.et al. (2013). ADOS-2: Autism diagnostic observation schedule-second edition. Oxford, United Kingdom: Hogrefe.
71
MaennerM. J.WarrenZ.WilliamsA. R.AmoakoheneE.BakianA. V.BilderD. A.et al. (2023). Prevalence and characteristics of autism Spectrum disorder among children aged 8 years — autism and developmental disabilities monitoring network, 11 sites, United States, 2020. MMWR Surveill. Summ.72, 1–14. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.ss7202a1,
72
MarkovD.JaffeF.DoghramjiK. (2006). Update on parasomnias: a review for psychiatric practice. Psychiatry (Edgmont)3, 69–76,
73
MasiA.DeMayoM. M.GlozierN.GuastellaA. J. (2017). An overview of autism spectrum disorder, heterogeneity and treatment options. Neurosci. Bull.33, 183–193. doi: 10.1007/s12264-017-0100-y,
74
MazurekM. O.SohlK. (2016). Sleep and behavioral problems in children with autism spectrum disorder. J. Autism Dev. Disord.46, 1906–1915. doi: 10.1007/s10803-016-2723-7,
75
MazzoneL.PostorinoV.SiracusanoM.RiccioniA.CuratoloP. (2018). The relationship between sleep problems, neurobiological alterations, core symptoms of autism spectrum disorder, and psychiatric comorbidities. J. Clin. Med.7:102. doi: 10.3390/jcm7050102,
76
McLaughlin CrabtreeV.WilliamsN. A. (2009). Normal sleep in children and adolescents. Child Adolesc. Psychiatr. Clin. N. Am.18, 799–811. doi: 10.1016/j.chc.2009.04.013,
77
MeltzerL. J.MindellJ. A. (2008). Behavioral sleep disorders in children and adolescents. Sleep Med. Clin.3, 269–279. doi: 10.1016/j.jsmc.2008.01.004
78
MignolliE.ScialpiA.ValenteD.BerardiA.GaleotoG.TofaniM. (2022). Sleep disturbance scale for children: Italian validation in autism spectrum disorder population. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health19:10163. doi: 10.3390/ijerph191610163,
79
MindellJ. A.LiA. M.SadehA.KwonR.GohD. Y. T. (2015). Bedtime routines for young children: a dose-dependent association with sleep outcomes. Sleep38, 717–722. doi: 10.5665/sleep.4662,
80
MinginsJ. E.TarverJ.WaiteJ.JonesC.SurteesA. D. (2021). Anxiety and intellectual functioning in autistic children: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Autism25, 18–32. doi: 10.1177/1362361320953253,
81
MorieK. P.JacksonS.ZhaiZ. W.PotenzaM. N.DritschelB. (2019). Mood disorders in high-functioning autism: the importance of alexithymia and emotional regulation. J. Autism Dev. Disord.49, 2935–2945. doi: 10.1007/s10803-019-04020-1,
82
NeeceC. L.GreenS. A.BakerB. L. (2012). Parenting stress and child behavior problems: a transactional relationship across time. Am. J. Intellect. Dev. Disabil.117, 48–66. doi: 10.1352/1944-7558-117.1.48,
83
NguyenJ.ZhangB.HansonE.MylonasD.MaskiK. (2022). Neurobehavioral associations with NREM and REM sleep architecture in children with autism spectrum disorder. Children9:1322. doi: 10.3390/children9091322,
84
PalaginiL.MorettoU.Dell’OssoL.CarneyC. (2017). Sleep-related cognitive processes, arousal, and emotion dysregulation in insomnia disorder: the role of insomnia-specific rumination. Sleep Med.30, 97–104. doi: 10.1016/j.sleep.2016.11.004,
85
PandolfiV.MagyarC. I.NorrisM. (2014). Validity study of the CBCL 6–18 for the assessment of emotional problems in youth with ASD. J. Ment. Health Res. Intellect. Disabil.7, 306–322. doi: 10.1080/19315864.2014.930547,
86
ParkH. S.YiS. Y.YoonS. A.HongS. B. (2018). Comparison of the autism diagnostic observation schedule and childhood autism rating scale in the diagnosis of autism spectrum disorder: a preliminary study. Soa Chongsonyon Chongsin Uihak29, 172–177. doi: 10.5765/jkacap.180015,
87
PinghiniS.GiordanoL.BanditelliF.BucciR.EusebiA.FilippiniE.et al. (2025). Sleep disorders in children with neurodevelopmental disorders: comparative actigraphy and questionnaire assessment in ASD, ADHD, and controls. Sleep Med.136:106794. doi: 10.1016/j.sleep.2025.106794,
88
RibasL. H.MontezanoB. B.NievesM.KampmannL. B.JansenK. (2024). The role of parental stress on emotional and behavioral problems in offspring: a systematic review with meta-analysis. J. Pediatr.100, 565–585. doi: 10.1016/j.jped.2024.02.003,
89
RichdaleA. L. (1999). Sleep problems in autism: prevalence, cause, and intervention. Dev. Med. Child Neurol.41:S0012162299000122, 60–66. doi: 10.1017/S0012162299000122,
90
RobinsonO. J.VytalK.CornwellB. R.GrillonC. (2013). The impact of anxiety upon cognition: perspectives from human threat of shock studies. Front. Hum. Neurosci.7:203. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2013.00203,
91
RomeoD. M.BruniO.BrognaC.FerriR.GalluccioC.De ClementeV.et al. (2013). Application of the sleep disturbance scale for children (SDSC) in preschool age. Eur. J. Paediatr. Neurol.17:23352289, 374–382. doi: 10.1016/j.ejpn.2012.12.009,
92
RomeoD. M.CordaroG.MacchioneE.VeneziaI.BrognaC.MercuriE.et al. (2021). Application of the sleep disturbance scale for children (SDSC) in infants and toddlers (6–36 months). Sleep Med.81, 62–68. doi: 10.1016/j.sleep.2021.02.001,
93
SacreyL. A. R.ZwaigenbaumL.BrysonS. E.BrianJ. A.SmithI. M.GaronN.et al. (2022). Temperament in infancy predicts internalizing and externalizing problem behavior at age 5 in children with an increased likelihood of autism spectrum disorder. Front. Psychol.13:816041. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.816041
94
SalthouseT. A. (2014). Evaluating the correspondence of different cognitive batteries. Assessment21, 131–142. doi: 10.1177/1073191113486690,
95
SamsonA. C.PhillipsJ. M.ParkerK. J.ShahS.GrossJ. J.HardanA. Y. (2014). Emotion dysregulation and the Core features of autism Spectrum disorder. J. Autism Dev. Disord.44, 1766–1772. doi: 10.1007/s10803-013-2022-5,
96
SansaviniA.RivaM.ZuccariniM.AcetiA.CorvagliaL.ScherA.et al. (2022). Night sleep and parental bedtime practices in low-risk preterm and full-term late talkers. Children9:1813. doi: 10.3390/children9121813,
97
Sapey-TriompheL. A.DierckxJ.VettoriS.van OverwalleJ.WagemansJ. (2023). A multilevel investigation of sensory sensitivity and responsivity in autistic adults. Autism Res.16, 1299–1320. doi: 10.1002/aur.2962,
98
SellickT.UreA.WilliamsK. (2021). Repetitive and restricted behaviours and anxiety in autism spectrum disorder: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis. Syst. Rev.10:303. doi: 10.1186/s13643-021-01830-2,
99
ShawD. S.KeenanK.VondraJ. I. (1994). Developmental precursors of externalizing behavior: ages 1 to 3. Dev. Psychol.30, 355–364. doi: 10.1037/0012-1649.30.3.355
100
SikoraD. M.JohnsonK.ClemonsT.KatzT. (2012). The relationship between sleep problems and daytime behavior in children of different ages with autism spectrum disorders. Pediatrics130, S83–S90. doi: 10.1542/peds.2012-0900F
101
SinghiP.MalhiP. (2023). Early diagnosis of autism spectrum disorder: what the pediatricians should know. Indian J. Pediatr.90, 364–368. doi: 10.1007/s12098-022-04363-1,
102
SommersL.PapadopoulosN.Fuller-TyszkiewiczM.SciberrasE.McGillivrayJ.HowlinP.et al. (2024). The connection between sleep problems and emotional and behavioural difficulties in autistic children: a network analysis. J. Autism Dev. Disord.55, 1159–1171. doi: 10.1007/s10803-024-06298-2,
103
SzuhanyK. L.SimonN. M. (2022). Anxiety disorders. JAMA328, 2431–2445. doi: 10.1001/jama.2022.22744,
104
TandonM.CardeliE.LubyJ. (2009). Internalizing disorders in early childhood: a review of depressive and anxiety disorders. Child Adolesc. Psychiatr. Clin. N. Am.18, 593–610. doi: 10.1016/j.chc.2009.03.004,
105
TasséM. J.KimM. (2023). Examining the relationship between adaptive behavior and intelligence. Behav. Sci.13:e14378. doi: 10.3390/bs13030252,
106
TaylorM. J.LarssonH.LundströmS.LichtensteinP.ButwickaA. (2022). Etiological links between autism and difficulties in initiating and maintaining sleep: a familial co-aggregation and twin study. J. Child Psychol. Psychiatry63, 315–323. doi: 10.1111/jcpp.13473,
107
TaylorM. A.SchreckK. A.MulickJ. A. (2012). Sleep disruption as a correlate to cognitive and adaptive behavior problems in autism spectrum disorders. Res. Dev. Disabil.33, 1408–1417. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2012.03.013,
108
ThieuxM.ZhangM.Guignard-PerretA.MazzaS.PlancoulaineS.GuyonA.et al. (2024). Does the brain sleep differently depending on intellectual abilities?CNS Neurosci. Ther.30:183. doi: 10.1111/cns.14378
109
TudorM. E.HoffmanC. D.SweeneyD. P. (2012). Children with autism. Focus Autism Other Dev. Disabl.27, 254–262. doi: 10.1177/1088357612457989
110
van der SluisC. M.van SteenselF. J. A.BögelsS. M. (2015). Parenting and children’s internalizing symptoms: how important are parents?J. Child Fam. Stud.24, 3652–3661. doi: 10.1007/s10826-015-0174-y,
111
WangF.ChristS. L.Mills-KoonceW. R.Garrett-PetersP.CoxM. J. (2013). Association between maternal sensitivity and externalizing behavior from preschool to preadolescence. J. Appl. Dev. Psychol.34, 89–100. doi: 10.1016/j.appdev.2012.11.003,
112
WechslerD. (2012) in WISC-IV Wechsler intelligence scale for children. eds. OrsiniA.PicconeL.PizzutiL.. 4th ed (Firenze: Giunti Organizzazioni Speciali).
113
WeissM. D.SalpekarJ. (2010). Sleep problems in the child with attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder. CNS Drugs24, 811–828. doi: 10.2165/11538990-000000000-00000,
114
WuL. C.HattangadiN.Keown-StonemanC. D. G.MaguireJ. L.BirkenC. S.StremlerR.et al. (2022). Sleep duration and internalizing symptoms in children. J. Can. Acad. Child Adolesc. Psychiatry31, 115–123.
115
XavierS. D. (2021). The relationship between autism spectrum disorder and sleep. Sleep Sci14, 193–195. doi: 10.5935/1984-0063.20210050
116
ZaboskiB. A.StorchE. A. (2018). Comorbid autism Spectrum disorder and anxiety disorders: a brief review. Future Neurol.13, 31–37. doi: 10.2217/fnl-2017-0030,
117
Zaidman-ZaitA.ZwaigenbaumL.DukuE.BennettT.SzatmariP.MirendaP.et al. (2020). Factor analysis of the children’s sleep habits questionnaire among preschool children with autism spectrum disorder. Res. Dev. Disabil.97:103548. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2019.103548,
118
ZeidanJ.FombonneE.ScorahJ.IbrahimA.DurkinM. S.SaxenaS.et al. (2022). Global prevalence of autism: a systematic review update. Autism Res.15, John Wiley and Sons Inc, 778–790. doi: 10.1002/aur.2696,
119
ZhouA. M.BussK. A. (2021). Trajectories of internalizing symptoms in early childhood: associations with maternal internalizing symptoms and child physiology. Dev. Psychobiol.63, 1295–1308. doi: 10.1002/dev.22104,
120
ZuccariniM.RivaM.AcetiA.CorvagliaL.ScherA.GuariniA.et al. (2024). Night sleep, parental bedtime practices and language development in low-risk preterm and full-term late talkers: a longitudinal study in the third year of life. Children11:1393. doi: 10.3390/children11111393,
Summary
Keywords
adaptive functioning, age-specific analysis, autism spectrum disorder, behavioral problems, parenting stress, sleep disorders
Citation
Paone A, Logrieco MG, Guerrera S, Fucà E, Casula L, Minutolo A, Vicari S and Valeri G (2026) Sleep problems in autistic children and adolescents: an age-stratified approach. Front. Psychol. 17:1715093. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2026.1715093
Received
24 October 2025
Revised
11 February 2026
Accepted
16 February 2026
Published
04 March 2026
Volume
17 - 2026
Edited by
Wen-Xiong Chen, Guangzhou Medical University, China
Reviewed by
Mariagrazia Zuccarini, University of Bologna, Italy
Heeyeon Kim, Yonsei University, Republic of Korea
Updates
Copyright
© 2026 Paone, Logrieco, Guerrera, Fucà, Casula, Minutolo, Vicari and Valeri.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Maria Grazia Logrieco, maria.logrieco@unifg.it
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.