HYPOTHESIS AND THEORY article

Front. Psychol.

Sec. Organizational Psychology

Process Makes Perfect: Mapping Science Team Behavior Across Phases

    AN

    Angie N Benda

    WS

    William S Kramer

    HM

    Hanna M Johnston

    KC

    Kelsey Ciagala

    DJ

    Danielle J Crawford

    KN

    Kayla N Lacey

  • University of Nebraska at Omaha, Omaha, United States

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Abstract

Modern technological and methodological advancements in science require experts to collaborate to answer more complex questions. Science teams are uniquely equipped with expertise to explore novel approaches to answer these questions. Prior research has advanced the understanding of science teams through stage-based models, but a gap remains in integrating these models with process models. To address this gap, we draw on two foundational frameworks - the four-phased transdisciplinary team development model proposed by Hall et al. (2012) and the temporally grounded framework of team processes articulated by Marks et al. (2001) – to develop an integrated conceptual framework of science team behavior. We synthesize these two frameworks using a conceptual integration approach to map team processes with the focal activities that characterize the four phases of science teams. This integration highlights the criticality of transition processes in shaping coordination and the development of shared knowledge of team progress. The resulting framework offers insight into the dynamic nature of science teams and their processes, identifying what is most salient in each stage and what shifts as teams adapt. In doing so, we advance team science by elaborating on challenges that may be encountered and provide testable propositions to guide future empirical research and further support science teams.

Summary

Keywords

collaboration, Science of team science, Science teams, team processes, Translational research

Received

22 October 2025

Accepted

19 February 2026

Copyright

© 2026 Benda, Kramer, Johnston, Ciagala, Crawford and Lacey. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Angie N Benda

Disclaimer

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Outline

Share article

Article metrics