HYPOTHESIS AND THEORY article
Front. Psychol.
Sec. Organizational Psychology
Process Makes Perfect: Mapping Science Team Behavior Across Phases
Angie N Benda
William S Kramer
Hanna M Johnston
Kelsey Ciagala
Danielle J Crawford
Kayla N Lacey
University of Nebraska at Omaha, Omaha, United States
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Abstract
Modern technological and methodological advancements in science require experts to collaborate to answer more complex questions. Science teams are uniquely equipped with expertise to explore novel approaches to answer these questions. Prior research has advanced the understanding of science teams through stage-based models, but a gap remains in integrating these models with process models. To address this gap, we draw on two foundational frameworks - the four-phased transdisciplinary team development model proposed by Hall et al. (2012) and the temporally grounded framework of team processes articulated by Marks et al. (2001) – to develop an integrated conceptual framework of science team behavior. We synthesize these two frameworks using a conceptual integration approach to map team processes with the focal activities that characterize the four phases of science teams. This integration highlights the criticality of transition processes in shaping coordination and the development of shared knowledge of team progress. The resulting framework offers insight into the dynamic nature of science teams and their processes, identifying what is most salient in each stage and what shifts as teams adapt. In doing so, we advance team science by elaborating on challenges that may be encountered and provide testable propositions to guide future empirical research and further support science teams.
Summary
Keywords
collaboration, Science of team science, Science teams, team processes, Translational research
Received
22 October 2025
Accepted
19 February 2026
Copyright
© 2026 Benda, Kramer, Johnston, Ciagala, Crawford and Lacey. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Angie N Benda
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.