Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Psychol.

Sec. Sport Psychology

This article is part of the Research TopicThe Cognitive Era in Sports Performance: Mental Fatigue, Cognitive Training, Sleep and Psychological Ergogenic Substances-Volume IIView all 24 articles

The Expert's Fixation: Cognitive Efficiency and Attentional Selectivity in Wheelchair Curling Athletes Across the Expertise Spectrum

Provisionally accepted
Wanting  LiWanting Li1Xiaokun  ZhangXiaokun Zhang2Chunzhou  ZhaoChunzhou Zhao3Jianrui  LiJianrui Li1Bo  LiBo Li1*
  • 1Harbin Sport University, Harbin, China
  • 2Harbin Normal University, Harbin, China
  • 3Chizhou University, Chizhou, China

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Background: In precision Paralympic sports like wheelchair curling, visual attention is a paramount cognitive determinant of performance. While expertise-dependent differences in gaze behavior are documented in various sports, the specific cognitive mechanisms—particularly attentional selectivity and efficiency—underpinning elite performance in wheelchair curling remain unexplored. This study investigated the visual attention patterns of disabled curling athletes across skill levels to uncover the cognitive strategies associated with expertise. Methods: Forty-eight disabled curling athletes were stratified into elite (Paralympic/World Champions, n=16), general (National Champions, n=16), and novice (Provincial Champions, n=16) groups. Using Tobii Pro Glasses 3, eye movements were recorded during stone deliveries. Metrics included the number of fixations, fixation duration, and their distribution across predefined Areas of Interest (AOIs: Release Zone, Stone Path, Target/House, Other Areas). Performance was quantitatively assessed by international-level judges based on stone placement accuracy. Results: A significant Group × AOI interaction was found for both number of fixations (p < 0.001,) and fixation duration (p < 0.001). Elite athletes allocated a significantly higher proportion of their fixations (54.3%) and viewing time (59.8%) to the Target, while minimizing attention to Other Areas (14.7% of fixations, 6.3% of duration). Novices displayed a dispersed attentional pattern, with more fixations on non-essential areas. Elites also demonstrated greater cognitive economy, evidenced by a lower total number of fixations and shorter total fixation duration than novices. Critically, fixation measures on the Target were positively correlated with performance scores (strongest in elites: r= 0.53, p < 0.01), whereas attention to Other Areas and the Stone Path was negatively correlated. Conclusion: Elite performance in wheelchair curling is characterized by highly selective and efficient visual attention. Experts excel not only in focusing on task-critical information but also in actively suppressing distractions, a hallmark of automated cognitive processing. These findings extend the "Quiet Eye" and cognitive efficiency theories to wheelchair curling, highlighting the critical role of perceptual-cognitive skills. They provide a robust empirical basis for developing targeted attention training protocols to accelerate expertise development in precision sports for athletes with disabilities.

Keywords: cognitive efficiency3, eye-tracking2, Paralympic sport5, quiet eye6, visual attention1, wheelchair curling4

Received: 04 Nov 2025; Accepted: 03 Feb 2026.

Copyright: © 2026 Li, Zhang, Zhao, Li and Li. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Bo Li

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.