ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Psychol.

Sec. Personality and Social Psychology

Unequal Benefits: Housing Provident Fund and Happiness Among China's Migrant and Non-Migrant Populations

  • 1. Anhui University of Technology, Ma'anshan, China

  • 2. Zhongnan University of Economics and Law, Wuhan, China

  • 3. Zhejiang University of Technology, Hangzhou, China

Article metrics

View details

90

Views

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Abstract

This study examines whether China's Housing Provident Fund (HPF) improves subjective well-being equitably across urban populations. Using data from the China Household Finance Survey (CHFS), we ask two questions: (1) Does HPF participation enhance individuals' happiness? (2) Do its effects differ between migrant and non-migrant residents? Employing multivariate regression models with rich socioeconomic controls, we find that HPF participation is positively associated with overall happiness. However, this association is uneven: a statistically significant positive relationship is observed for non-migrants, while no statistically meaningful association is found for migrants. Mechanism analyses indicate that this disparity stems from migrants' limited ability to utilize HPF benefits, particularly housing loans, due to unstable employment and shorter job tenures that hinder eligibility and savings accumulation. These findings reveal that a policy designed as a universal housing support system produces unequal welfare outcomes. By shifting attention from average effects to distributional consequences, this study advances the literature on housing policy and subjective well-being and demonstrates how universal programs can reinforce existing social stratification in rapidly urbanizing societies.

Summary

Keywords

China, Equality, happiness, Housing Provident Fund, migrant

Received

07 November 2025

Accepted

28 January 2026

Copyright

© 2026 Li, Wu and Hu. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Mingzhi Hu

Disclaimer

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Outline

Share article

Article metrics