Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Psychol.

Sec. Evolutionary Psychology

PREFERENCE FOR CONSENSUAL NON-MONOGAMY Trying to Understand Who Seeks Open Relationships: An Evolutionary Perspective

Provisionally accepted
Vlad  BurtaverdeVlad Burtaverde1*Bogdan  OpreaBogdan Oprea2Peter  Karl JonasonPeter Karl Jonason3,4Serban  Andrei ZanfirescuSerban Andrei Zanfirescu2Stefan  Cosmin IonescuStefan Cosmin Ionescu2
  • 1University of Bucharest, Bucharest, Romania
  • 2Psychology, University of Bucharest, Bucharest, Romania
  • 3Psychology, Cardinal Stefan Wyszynski University, Warsaw, Poland
  • 4Department of Psychology, University of Padova, Padova, Italy

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Abstract Even if monogamy is the most desirable form of romantic relationship in the modern era, humans engage in an array of mating strategies. We aimed to understand consensual non-monogamy (CNM) from an adaptationist perspective by developing a measure of CNM preferences (Open Relationship Questionnaire; ORQ) and linking it to various relationships and life outcomes. Following construct operationalization and a literature search of CNM-related attitudes and behaviors, we generated 69 items as the initial item pool for the questionnaire. In Study 1 (n = 271), four factors emerged: negative perceptions toward CNM, emotional insecurity in open relationships, preferences for CNM, and discriminatory views of CNM, which are related to the Dark Triad traits, life history strategies, mate value, sociosexuality, childhood maltreatment, and romantic love. In Study 2 (n = 272), we confirmed the internal structure of the ORQ and related it to childhood economic status and sexual fantasies. This research offers new and interesting insights into a specific, less (mis)understood mating strategy.

Keywords: consensual non-monogamy, Life history theory, mating strategies, Personality, sociosexuality

Received: 06 Dec 2025; Accepted: 16 Feb 2026.

Copyright: © 2026 Burtaverde, Oprea, Jonason, Zanfirescu and Ionescu. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Vlad Burtaverde

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.