ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Psychol.
Sec. Health Psychology
Mental Health Burden and Service Barriers Among Medical and Health Sciences Students: Prevalence and Determinants from a Cross-Sectional Analysis
Shaimaa Mohamed Hassan 1,2
Najeeb M Alqahtani 2
Salihah M Alshahrani 2
Abdulkhalig A Alhefzy 2
Khaled W Al Assiri 2
Bandar W Al Assiri 2
Omar S Alharthi 2
Muhannad M Alharbi 2
1. Histology and Cell Biology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Menoufia University, Shebin El Koum, Egypt., Shebin El Koum,, Egypt
2. Batterjee Medical College, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Abstract
Abstract: Background: Medical and health sciences students face significant academic, clinical, and social pressures that increase their risk of psychological distress. Prior studies report elevated levels of depression, anxiety, and stress in this group. Barriers to accessing mental health services such as stigma, confidentiality concerns, limited awareness, and fear of negative consequences further compound this risk. Understanding the prevalence, determinants, and service barriers is essential for developing effective support systems. Aim: To determine the prevalence and determinants of depression, anxiety, and stress among medical and health sciences students at Batterjee Medical College, Saudi Arabia, and to identify barriers limiting their access to mental health services. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted among 384 students using a self-administered online survey. The Depression Anxiety Stress Scales-21 (DASS-21) assessed psychological distress, while the Barriers to Mental Health Services Scale-Revised (BMHSS-R) measured perceived obstacles to seeking help. Data were analyzed to identify prevalence, associated demographic and academic factors, and barriers to mental health service utilization. Results: Depression, anxiety, and stress (DAS) were evaluated using validated DASS-21 subscales demonstrating excellent internal consistency (α > 0.88). The total BMHSS score showed significant associations with academic factors, including major, year of study, and GPA (P ≤ 0.01). Gender was a strong predictor of psychological distress, with female students reporting significantly higher mean scores across all DAS domains (P ≤ 0.000439). Age was significantly associated with anxiety and stress (P ≤ 0.024). Students residing in urban areas reported higher anxiety scores than those in rural regions (P = 0.029). These findings identify gender, age, and residence as key demographic risk factors requiring targeted interventions. Conclusion: The study found a high prevalence of depression, anxiety, and stress among medical and health sciences students, with demographic and academic characteristics emerging as significant correlates. Intrinsic barriers, such as stigma and self-reliance, and extrinsic barriers, including accessibility and cost, further limited help-seeking and compounded psychological distress. These findings emphasize the need for comprehensive institutional mental health strategies and longitudinal research to enhance student well-being.
Summary
Keywords
Anxiety, Depression, determinants, Medical & health sciences students, Mental Health Services, Prevalence, stress
Received
11 December 2025
Accepted
18 February 2026
Copyright
© 2026 Hassan, Alqahtani, Alshahrani, Alhefzy, Al Assiri, Al Assiri, Alharthi and Alharbi. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Shaimaa Mohamed Hassan
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.