ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Psychol.
Sec. Sport Psychology
Physical activity motivation is inversely associated with anxiety: a cross-sectional serial mediation analysis involving smartphone addiction symptoms and sleep quality in medical undergraduates
Teng Ma 1
Lili Wang 2
Bingwei Dou 1
1. Xinjiang Second Medical College, Karamay, China
2. Shihezi University, Shihezi, China
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Abstract
Background: Anxiety is common among medical undergraduates, yet modifiable behavioral pathways underlying the association between physical activity motivation and anxiety remain unclear. Guided by self-determination theory, the Interaction of Person–Affect–Cognition–Execution (I-PACE) model, and the two-process/hyperarousal framework of sleep, we tested smartphone addiction symptoms and sleep quality as parallel and serial statistical mediators of this association. Methods: In a cross-sectional survey of 1,276 Chinese medical undergraduates, we assessed physical activity motivation (Motives for Physical Activity Measure–Revised, 15 items), smartphone addiction symptoms (Smartphone Addiction Scale–Short Version), sleep quality (Sleep Quality Questionnaire–9; higher scores indicate poorer sleep), and anxiety (Generalized Anxiety Disorder–7). All instruments were administered using a harmonized 5-point Likert response format. Indirect effects were estimated using Hayes’ PROCESS macro (Model 6) with 5,000 bootstrap resamples, controlling for sex and grade (academic year). Results: In bivariate analyses, physical activity motivation was inversely correlated with anxiety (r = −0.261, p < .001). In the covariate-adjusted serial mediation models, the total effect on anxiety was c = −0.311 (95% CI [−0.385, −0.237]) and remained statistically significant after accounting for smartphone addiction symptoms and sleep quality (direct effect: c′ = −0.216, 95% CI [−0.293, −0.139]). The total indirect effect was B = −0.095 (95% CI [−0.126, −0.066]). Specific indirect effects were significant via smartphone addiction symptoms (B = −0.062, 95% CI [−0.086, −0.040]) and via sleep quality (B = −0.028, 95% CI [−0.046, −0.012]), as well as via the serial pathway (physical activity motivation → smartphone addiction symptoms → sleep quality → anxiety; B = −0.006, 95% CI [−0.010, −0.002]; 1.80% of the total effect). Conclusion: Higher physical activity motivation was associated with lower anxiety, with this association partially statistically accounted for by lower smartphone addiction symptoms and better sleep quality (lower sleep-quality scores), including a modest serial indirect pathway. Given the cross-sectional design, these indirect effects should be interpreted as statistical associations rather than causal mechanisms; longitudinal and experimental studies using objective smartphone-use and sleep metrics are needed to test temporal ordering.
Summary
Keywords
Anxiety, I-PACE model, Medical undergraduates, Physical activity motivation, self-determination theory, serial mediation, sleep quality, Smartphone addiction symptoms
Received
02 January 2026
Accepted
18 February 2026
Copyright
© 2026 Ma, Wang and Dou. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Lili Wang
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.